Occupational lung disease
For patient information click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Synonyms and keywords: Coalworker’s pneumoconiosis; lung melanosis; anthracosis; black lung disease; bysinnosis; disease of workers
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
Occupational lung diseases have long been described since the Egyptian and Roman empires existed. Dr. Benardino Ramazzini, described as the “father of occupational medicine” was first to coin the term “disease of workers” in the 17th century. Occupational lung disease may be classified according to the type of inhalant into 3 groups: inorganic dust, organic dust, and agents other than inorganic and organic dust.As the particles accumulate, the body’s elimination mechanisms begin to fail, resulting in activation of chemotactic factors that exacerbate the inflammatory response, and subsequently lead to fibrosis. Occupational lung disease may be caused by organic dust such as thermophilic and true fungi, and bacteria and animal proteins, or by inorganic dust such as, silicates, carbons and metals, or by agents other than organic or inorganic dusts such as, chemicals, gases, fumes, vapors and aerosols. Incidence, prevalence and mortality rates for occupational lung disease are not well documented and are unreliable. Disease manifestation is correlated to the frequency, duration and dose of inhalational exposure. Occupational lung disease has no predilection to race or gender, however, males tend to work in environments where exposure is common, therefore more males suffer from occupational lung disease. Occupational lung disease, particularly, coal worker’s pneumoconiosis is a common disease that tends to affect coal miners in West Virginia and Kentucky, USA and South Wales, UK. Common risk factors in the development of occupational lung disease include smoking, genetic susceptibility, cardiovascular disease, and frequency, intensity and duration of exposure. If left untreated, patients with occupational lung disease may progress to develop pleural effusion, interstitial lung fibrosis, and lung cancer. Common complications of of occupational lung disease include interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, progressive massive fibrosis, mesothelioma, and premature death. The initial study of choice for the diagnosis of occupational lung disease is a chest x-ray. The findings on x ray that are suggestive of occupational lung disease include, pleural thickening, plaques, calcifications, opacities and atelectasis. A positive history of occupational exposure to a particular agent with progressive worsening of respiratory symptoms including dyspnea, cough and fatigue. The most common symptoms of occupational lung disease include cough, shortness of breath, and wheezing. Physical examination of patients with occupational lung disease is usually remarkable for bronchial breathing, increased vocal resonance, and fine crepitations. A chest x-ray is the cornerstone of diagnosis in occupational lung disease. Findings on an x-ray suggestive of occupational lung disease include pleural thickening, pleural plaques, pleural abnormalities, calcification, small or large opacities, costophrenic angle obliteration, atelectasis, pneumothorax, parenchymal bands, enlarged hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes, bullae and granulomata. A high resolution chest CT scan or “thin-section” CT may be helpful in the further diagnosis of occupational lung disease. Findings on CT scan suggestive of occupational lung disease include nodules with sharp margination, opacities, lymph node hyperplasia and egg shell calcification, and interlobular septal thickening and intralobular lines. The mainstay of treatment for occupational lung disease is medical therapy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with progressive massive fibrosis or lung cancer. Effective measures for the primary prevention of occupational lung disease include the prevention of smoking and smoking cessation, health awareness, and routine surveillance. Certain materials have been abolished from use in industry such as asbestos. Also reducing exposure through the use of medical masks and respirators, robots, isolation of harmful processes, ventilation, limiting exposure hours, maintenance of dust control systems, and the use of warning signs.
Historical Perspective
Occupational lung diseases have long been described since the Egyptian and Roman empires existed. The 10th century to the 18th century demonstrated the largest period of industrial mechanization and infrastructure, this led to the awareness and advent of occupational health hazards and sciences. These movements led to the rising need for trade unions and workers’ legislation. Dr. Benardino Ramazzini, described as the “father of occupational medicine” was first to coin the term “disease of workers” in the 17th century. Later in the 20th century , Dr. Alison Hamilton became a leading expert in occupational health.
Classification
Occupational lung disease may be classified according to the type of inhalant into 3 groups: inorganic dust, organic dust, and agents other than inorganic and organic dust.
Pathophysiology
Occupational lung diseases include the pneumoconioses (interstitial lung diseases), hypersensitivity pneumonitis, bronchiolitis, byssinosis, and occupational asthma. Pneumoconiosis is an interstitial lung disease caused by the accumulation of different dust particles in the alveolar space. As the particles accumulate, the body’s elimination mechanisms begin to fail, resulting in activation of chemotactic factors that exacerbate the inflammatory response, and subsequently lead to fibrosis. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis or extrinsic allergic alveolitis and its subcategories of, bronchiolitis, bysinnosis and occupational asthma are all part of the respiratory systems’ over reactivity towards inhalants.
Causes
Occupational lung disease may be caused by organic dust such as thermophilic and true fungi, and bacteria and animal proteins, or by inorganic dust such as, silicates, carbons and metals, or by agents other than organic or inorganic dusts such as, chemicals, gases, fumes, vapors and aerosols.
Differentiating occupational lung disease from Other Diseases
Occupational lung disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause shortness of breath, cough, and wheeze, such as allergic asthma, emphysema, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, and chronic bronchitis.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Incidence, prevalence and mortality rates for occupational lung disease are not well documented and are unreliable. Individual occupational lung diseases have separate prevalence and incidence rates, such as, farmer’s lung has an incidence of 270 cases per 100,000 in 2012. Whilst the mortality rates for work-related disease are approximately 63,000 deaths in 2012. Disease manifestation is correlated to the frequency, duration and dose of inhalational exposure. Occupational lung disease has no predilection to race or gender, however, males tend to work in environments where exposure is common, therefore more males suffer from occupational lung disease. Occupational lung disease, particularly, coal worker’s pneumoconiosis is a common disease that tends to affect coal miners in West Virginia and Kentucky, USA and South Wales, UK.
Risk Factors
Common risk factors in the development of occupational lung disease include smoking, genetic susceptibility, cardiovascular disease, and frequency, intensity and duration of exposure.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for occupational lung disease at a national level, however, at a local level workers with known occupational hazards benefit from a routine screening at their places of work.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
If left untreated, patients with occupational lung disease may progress to develop pleural effusion, interstitial lung fibrosis, and lung cancer. Common complications of of occupational lung disease include interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, progressive massive fibrosis, mesothelioma, and premature death. Depending on the extent of the disease progression at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as poor.
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice
The initial study of choice for the diagnosis of occupational lung disease is a chest x-ray. The findings on x ray that are suggestive of occupational lung disease include, pleural thickening, plaques, calcifications, opacities and atelectasis.
History and Symptoms
A positive history of occupational exposure to a particular agent with progressive worsening of respiratory symptoms including dyspnea, cough and fatigue. The most common symptoms of occupational lung disease include cough, shortness of breath, and wheezing. Less common symptoms of occupational lung disease include hemoptysis, weight loss, and loss of appetite.
Physical Examination
Patients with occupational lung disease usually appear fatigued and short of breath. Physical examination of patients with occupational lung disease is usually remarkable for bronchial breathing, increased vocal resonance, and fine crepitations.
Laboratory Findings
There are no diagnostic laboratory findings associated with occupational lung disease. However, useful laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of occupational lung disease include abnormal arterial blood gases, sputum analysis, and blood picture.
Electrocardiogram
There are no ECG findings associated with occupational lung disease. However, chronic lung disease may be complicated by cor pulmonale. Findings on an ECG suggestive of cor pulmonale include, right axis deviation, R/S amplitude ratio in V1 greater than 1, R/S amplitude ratio in V6 less than 1, peaked P waves (P pulmonale in leads 2, 3, and aVF), S 1 Q 3 T 3 pattern and incomplete (or complete) right bundle branch block, and possibly, a low voltage QRS complex.
X-ray
A chest x-ray is the cornerstone of diagnosis in occupational lung disease. Findings on an x-ray suggestive of occupational lung disease include pleural thickening, pleural plaques, pleural abnormalities, calcification, small or large opacities, costophrenic angle obliteration, atelectasis, pneumothorax, parenchymal bands, enlarged hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes, bullae and granulomata.
Echocardiography and Ultrasound
There are no echocardiography/ultrasound findings associated with occupational lung disease.
CT scan
Initially, the first investigation recommended to diagnose occupational lung disease is a chest x-ray. A high resolution chest CT scan or “thin-section” CT may be helpful in the further diagnosis of occupational lung disease. Findings on CT scan suggestive of occupational lung disease include nodules with sharp margination, opacities, lymph node hyperplasia and egg shell calcification, and interlobular septal thickening and intralobular lines.
MRI
There are no MRI findings associated with occupational lung disease. However, a MRI may be helpful in distinguishing in (coal worker’s pneumonconiosis) progressive massive fibrosis from lung carcinoma.
Other Imaging Findings
PET may be helpful in the diagnosis and staging of mesothelioma. PET is also useful in distinguishing a fibrotic nodule from an actively inflamed nodule.
Other Diagnostic Studies
Other diagnostic studies for occupational lung disease include spirometry, which distinguishes obstructive from restrictive lung disease.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Supportive therapy for occupational lung disease before fibrotic disease sets in includes glucocorticoid therapy. Anti-asthmatic drugs may also be used to provide relief from dyspnea.
Surgery
The mainstay of treatment for occupational lung disease is medical therapy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with progressive massive fibrosis or lung cancer.
Primary Prevention
Effective measures for the primary prevention of occupational lung disease include the prevention of smoking and smoking cessation, health awareness, and routine surveillance. Certain materials have been abolished from use in industry such as asbestos. Also reducing exposure through the use of medical masks and respirators, robots, isolation of harmful processes, ventilation, limiting exposure hours, maintenance of dust control systems, and the use of warning signs.
Secondary Prevention
Effective measures for the secondary prevention of occupational lung disease include cessation of smoking and exposure, and routine screening including skin prick tests, questionnaires and spirometry.
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
Occupational lung diseases have long been described since the Egyptian and Roman empires existed. The 10th century to the 18th century demonstrated the largest period of industrial mechanization and infrastructure, this led to the awareness and advent of occupational health hazards and sciences. These movements led to the rising need for trade unions and workers’ legislation. Dr. Benardino Ramazzini, described as the “father of occupational medicine” was first to coin the term “disease of workers” in the 17th century. Later in the 20th century , Dr. Alison Hamilton became a leading expert in occupational health.
Historical Perspective
- Occupational lung diseases have been described since the time of Egyptian, Grecian and Roman empires, where extensive land mining and building took place.[1][2][3]
- Furthermore, in the 16th and 17th century an awareness for occupational health hazards became apparent with exposure to arsenic, lead and carbon monoxide.
- In the 18th century, Dr. Bernardino Ramazzini, described as “the father of occupational medicine” described the “disease of workers” in the 1700s.
- In the late 18th century, Hale introduced the importance of ventilation and Von Humboldt invented gas masks for coal workers.
- The advent of the industrial revolution beginning with cotton picking in India in the 10th century, and leading up to mechanization in Europe later in the 18th century greatly contributed to the prevalence of occupational lung disease.
- In the 19th century, workers that suffered from occupational disease initiated the legislation, trade union and insurance movements.
- In the 20th century, Dr. Alice Hamilton established the study on occupational disease, whilst Dr. Hariett Hardy and Dr. Irving Selikoff described berylliosis and asbestosis respectively.
Outbreaks
- There has been a recent cluster discovery in February 2018 of coal worker’s pneumoconiosis amongst coal miner’s in Kentucky, Virginia and West Virginia.
- Coal worker’s pneumoconiosis complicated by progressive massive fibrosis in these regions was previously seen 5 – 7 times per year.
- As of February 2018, 154 new cases were diagnosed within one year.
Impact on Cultural History
- The slave trade and industrial revolution are crucial events in history that established many occupational hazards.
References
- ↑ Kreiss K, Gomaa A, Kullman G, Fedan K, Simoes EJ, Enright PL (2002). “Clinical bronchiolitis obliterans in workers at a microwave-popcorn plant”. N. Engl. J. Med. 347 (5): 330–8. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa020300. PMID 12151470.
- ↑ Crosland M (2009). “The French Academy of Sciences as a patron of the medical sciences in the early nineteenth century”. Ann Sci. 66 (2): 247–65. doi:10.1080/00033790802292638. PMID 19831262.
- ↑ Sigerist HE (1936). “The Wesley M. Carpenter Lecture: “Historical Background of Industrial and Occupational Diseases““. Bull N Y Acad Med. 12 (11): 597–609. PMC 1965828. PMID 19312003.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
Occupational lung diseases include the pneumoconioses (interstitial lung diseases), hypersensitivity pneumonitis, bronchiolitis, byssinosis, and occupational asthma. Pneumoconiosis is an interstitial lung disease caused by the accumulation of different dust particles in the alveolar space. As the particles accumulate, the body’s elimination mechanisms begin to fail, resulting in activation of chemotactic factors that exacerbate the inflammatory response, and subsequently lead to fibrosis. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis or extrinsic allergic alveolitis and its subcategories of, bronchiolitis, byssinosis, and occupational asthma are all part of the respiratory systems’ over reactivity towards inhalants.
Pathophysiology
Pathogenesis of pneumoconioses
- The pathogenesis of pneumoconiosis starts with the inhalation of mineral, metallic, or dust particles.[1][2][3][4]
- The most common particles that cause pneumoconiosis are:
- Asbestos
- Silica (quartz, cristobalite, coesite, or tridymite silica polymorphs)
- Structural differences between the polymorphs of silica, are important because of the different degrees of biological reactivity they present, making some of them more toxic than others. The biological reactivity makes quartz more toxic, followed by tridymite, cristobalite, coesite, and finally stishovite.
- Coal
- Other dust particles may also lead to pneumoconiosis, such as hydrated magnesium silicate, hydrous aluminum silicate, bauxite, cobalt, beryllium, and iron.
- When particles reach the distal lung, the mucocilliary and lymphatic system take care of their elimination.
- Dust fibers must be less than 3 μm in diameter in order to penetrate the distal lung.
- Fibers greater than 5 μm are phagocytosed incompletely and retained in tissues.
- When particles increase in number, macrophages are activated to engulf those particles.
- Reticulin is then secreted by fibroblasts to entrap macrophages, as an attempt to control the excess of dust particles.
- The physiology of macrophage activation is subject to several theories:
- The macrophages are mainly derived from peripheral blood monocytes and, from local replication.
- The recruitment of monocytes from peripheral blood occurs in response to several chemotactic factors suggest that one of the most potent chemotactic factors for peripheral blood monocytes is monocyte chemoattractant protein – 1 (MCP – 1), suggesting its role in chronic macrophage inflammation.
- TNFα activates MCP – 1 expression. MCP – 1 is a 76 amino acid peptide that activates monocytes, also increases its cytostatic activity, and the expression of monocyte adhesion molecules such as CD11c/CD18 and CD11b/CD18.
- As exposure continues, the elimination system begins to fail, leading to release of reactive oxygen species. These in turn exacerbate the inflammatory response, with the release of more cytokines, such as TNF and interleukins, which subsequently lead to fibrogenesis.
- In asbestosis, the macrophages cannot eliminate the fibers, and cause needle-like formations containing iron to coalesce, these bodies are known as asteroid bodies.
- In coal worker’s pneumoconiosis, coal dust trapped within the coalesced macrophages give a coal macule seen on x-ray.
- The determinants for the rate of disease progression are the accumulative dose; that is based on duration and intensity of exposure, the fiber type and individual susceptibility.
- The underlying pathogenic mechanisms that lead to pulmonary fibrosis in pneumoconiosis suggest a potential protective effect of TGF- β on the development of pulmonary fibrosis.
- The alveolar macrophages in coal miners with massive fibrosis, secretes two main profibrotic factors; platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF – 1), whereas, the patients with simple pneumoconiosis secretes transforming growth factor – β (TGF – β). This reinforces that TGF- β has a possible protective effect against the development of pulmonary fibrosis.
Pathogenesis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis
- Hypersensitivity is thought to develop via a two-hit hypothesis.[1][5]
- Those with a genetic predisposition (no specific genes have been consistently associated) or a heavier than normal exposure will become sensitized.
- The second hit occurs with exposure to an antigen resulting in the manifestation of disease or its progression.
- Acute hypersensitivity is thought to be a type III hypersensitivity reaction.
- Subacute and chronic hypersensitivity reactions are type IV hypersensitivity reactions.
- CD4+ Th1 and Th17 cells are presented with antigens by dendritic cells and alveolar macrophages.
- In response, an inflammatory cascade is triggered with the release of IFN ‒ γ, TNF, IL ‒ 17, and IL – 22.
- The continuous presence of a numerous cytokines and chemokines causes mononuclear cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts to continually infiltrate the lung tissue.
- Vast numbers of lymphocytes infiltrate the lung tissue intent on causing apoptosis, IL – 17 inhibits the lymphocytes from doing so.
- As a result, this leads to the development of non-caseating granulomas and inflammation of the small airways, which is known as bronchiolitis.
- In the chronic pattern of disease, a cytokine pattern lead primarily by CD4+ Th2 takes place, which is associated with the development of fibrosis in the lung.
- Hallmarks for hypersensitivity pneumonitis include, cholesterol clefts, centrilobular fibrosis, peribronchiolar and bridging fibrosis.
Biological Reactivity of Different Dust Particles
- Each dust particle has a different degree of biological reactivity.[3][4]
- This variability is due to properties in the surface of the particles.
- In the case of silica, there are two theories explaining their biological reactivity:
- One theory states that silica is a hydrogen donor, whereas biological macromolecules are hydrogen acceptors, creating strong hydrogen bonds that contribute to the damage.
- The second theory states that at a pH of 7.0, silica is negatively charged, and therefore attracts alveolar macrophages, and activates the generation of reactive oxygen species and cytokines.
Shown below is a table summarizing the dust exposure associated with pneumoconiosis:
| Disease | Dust |
|---|---|
| Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis | Coal dust |
| Silicosis | Silica |
| Asbestosis | Asbestos |
| Talcosis | Hydrated magnesium silicate |
| Kaolin – induced pneumoconiosis | Hydrous aluminum silicate |
| Mixed dust pneumoconiosis | Coal dust, smoke from fires, and silicates |
| Aluminum – induced pneumoconiosis | Bauxite (Al2O3) |
| Berylliosis | Beryllium |
| Silicosiderosis | Silica and iron |
| Hard – metal disease (giant cell pneumonitis) | Cobalt |
Associated Conditions
Conditions associated with occupational lung disease include:[1]
- Asthma
- Chronic bronchitis
- Emphysema
- Allergic rhinitis
- Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- Hives
- Eczema
- Mesothelioma
- Non-small cell lung cancer
- Tuberculosis
- Pleural effusion
- Pleural plaques and fibrosis
- Pulmonary edema
Caplan syndrome
- Caplan syndrome is a rare complication of coal worker’s pneumoconiosis that occurs simultaneously with rheumatoid arthritis.[6]
- In this syndrome, the joint manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis present with bilateral, peripheral lung nodules.
- These nodules are unique from other pneumoconiotic nodules in that they develop rapidly over a period of weeks and may form cavities or become calcified.
Gross Pathology
- On gross pathology, dilated airways, destruction and distortion of lung tissue, and discoloration of lung tissue are characteristic findings of occupational lung disease.[7]

Microscopic Pathology
- On microscopic histopathological analysis, calcification, central necrosis, dense collagen, and sometimes malignant cells are characteristic findings of occupational lung disease.[8]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Castranova V, Vallyathan V (2000). “Silicosis and coal workers’ pneumoconiosis”. Environ Health Perspect. 108 Suppl 4: 675–84. PMC 1637684. PMID 10931786.
- ↑ name=”pmid9072984″>Boitelle A, Gosset P, Copin MC, Vanhee D, Marquette CH, Wallaert B; et al. (1997). “MCP-1 secretion in lung from nonsmoking patients with coal worker’s pneumoconiosis”. Eur Respir J. 10 (3): 557–62. PMID 9072984.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Vanhée D, Gosset P, Boitelle A, Wallaert B, Tonnel AB (1995). “Cytokines and cytokine network in silicosis and coal workers’ pneumoconiosis”. Eur Respir J. 8 (5): 834–42. PMID 7656959.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 McLoud TC (1991). “Occupational lung disease”. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 29 (5): 931–41. PMID 1871262.
- ↑ name=”pmid9072984″>Boitelle A, Gosset P, Copin MC, Vanhee D, Marquette CH, Wallaert B; et al. (1997). “MCP-1 secretion in lung from nonsmoking patients with coal worker’s pneumoconiosis”. Eur Respir J. 10 (3): 557–62. PMID 9072984.
- ↑ name=”pmid9072984″>Boitelle A, Gosset P, Copin MC, Vanhee D, Marquette CH, Wallaert B; et al. (1997). “MCP-1 secretion in lung from nonsmoking patients with coal worker’s pneumoconiosis”. Eur Respir J. 10 (3): 557–62. PMID 9072984.
- ↑ name=”pmid9072984″>Boitelle A, Gosset P, Copin MC, Vanhee D, Marquette CH, Wallaert B; et al. (1997). “MCP-1 secretion in lung from nonsmoking patients with coal worker’s pneumoconiosis”. Eur Respir J. 10 (3): 557–62. PMID 9072984.
- ↑ name=”pmid9072984″>Boitelle A, Gosset P, Copin MC, Vanhee D, Marquette CH, Wallaert B; et al. (1997). “MCP-1 secretion in lung from nonsmoking patients with coal worker’s pneumoconiosis”. Eur Respir J. 10 (3): 557–62. PMID 9072984.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
Occupational lung disease may be classified according to the type of inhalant into 3 groups: inorganic dust, organic dust, and agents other than inorganic and organic dust.
Classification
- Occupational lung disease may be classified according to the type of inhalant into 3 groups:
For a full classfication of occupational lung disease, please scroll down
| Occupational lung disease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Organic dust | Inorganic dust | Agents other than organic or inorganic agents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thermophilic and true fungi | Bacteria and animal proteins | Silicates | Carbons | Metals | Chemicals, gases, fumes, vapors and aerosols | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| • Farmer’s lung (Macropolyspora faeni) • Grain handler’s lung (Thermactinomyces vulgaris) • Humidifier or air conditioner lung (T. sacchari) • Aspergillus • Cryptostroma corticale • Aureobasidium pullulans • Penicillium species | • Bacillus subtilis • B. cereus • Bird fancier’s disease | • Silica (“silicosis”) • Asbestos (“asbestosis”) • Talc (hydrated Mg silicates; “talcosis”) • Kaolin or “china clay” (hydrated aluminum silicate) • Beryllium (“berylliosis”) • Mica (principally K and Mg aluminum silicates) • Portland cement • Aluminum silicates (sericite, sillimanite, zeolite) • Nepheline (hard rock containing mixed silicates) • Diatomaceous earth (Fuller’s earth, aluminum silicate with Fe and Mg) | • Coal dust (“coal worker’s pneumoconiosis”) • Graphite (“carbon pneumoconiosis”) | • Tin (“stannosis”) • Aluminum • Hard metal dusts (cadmium, tungsten, titanium and cobalt) • Iron (“siderosis”) • Antimony • Hematite (mixed dusts of iron oxide, silica and silicates; “siderosilicosis”) • Mixed dusts of silver and iron oxide (“argyrosiderosis”) • CuSO4 neutralized with hydrated lime (Bordeaux mixture; “vineyard sprayer’s lung”) • Rare earths (cerium, scandium, yttrium, lanthanum) | Chemical sources: • Synthetic – fiber lung (Orlon, polyesters, nylon, acrylic) • Bakelite worker’s lung pathways • Vinyl chloride, polyvinyl chloride powder Gases: • Oxygen • Oxides of nitrogen • Sulfur dioxide • Chlorine gas • Methyl isocyanate Fumes: • Oxides of zinc, copper, manganese, cadmium, iron, magnesium, nickel, brass, selenium, tin, and antimony • Diphenylmethane diisocyanate • Trimellitic anhydride toxicity Vapors: • Hydrocarbons • Thermosetting resins (rubber tire workers) • Toluene diisocyanate (TDI – asthmatic reactions prominent) • Oxygen • Mercury Aerosols: • Oils • Fats • Pyrethrum (a natural insecticide) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
Occupational lung disease may be caused by organic dust such as thermophilic and true fungi, and bacteria and animal proteins, or by inorganic dust such as, silicates, carbons and metals, or by agents other than organic or inorganic dusts such as, chemicals, gases, fumes, vapors, and aerosols.
Causes
Life-threatening Causes
- Life-threatening causes include conditions which may result in death or permanent disability within 24 hours if left untreated.
- Life-threatening causes of occupational lung disease include chemical gas inhalation such as chlorine or sarin gas.[1][2]
Common Causes
Common causes of occupational lung disease include:[3][4]
- Silica
- Asbestos
- Beryllium
- Mica
- Portland cement
- Aluminum silicates
- Aluminum
- Cadmium
- Tungsten
- Titanium
- Cobalt
- Iron
- Coal dust
- Graphite
- Macropolyspora faeni
- Thermactinomyces vulgaris
- Thermoactinomyces sacchari
- Aspergillus
- Copper sulfate neutralized with hydrated lime
- Bird droppings
Less Common Causes
Less common causes of occupational lung disease include:[5][6]
- Vinyl chloride
- Oxygen
- Nitrogen oxide
- Sulfur dioxide
- Chlorine gas
- Methyl isocyanate
- Zinc
- Copper
- Manganese
- Cadmium
- Iron
- Magnesium
- Nickel
- Selenium
- Tin
- Antimony
- Diphenylmethane diisocyanate
- Trimellitic anhydride
- Hydrocarbons
- Thermosetting resins
- Toluene diisocyanate
- Talc
- Kaolin
- Diacetyl
- Oxygen
- Mercury
- Oils
- Fats
- Pyrethrum
- Nepheline
- Diatomaceous earth
- Hematite
- Copper sulfate
- Cerium
- Scandium
- Yttrium
- Lanthanum
- Cryptostroma corticale
- Aureobasidium pullulans
- Penicillium species
- Bacillus subtilis
- Bacillus cereus
- Orlon
- Polyesters
- Nylon
- Acrylic
Genetic Causes
- Occupational lung disease may be triggered by a mutation in the following genes:[7]
- MUC5B promoter polymorphism
- Has been identified as causing progression in interstitial lung fibrosis
- HLA-DPB1*0201 polymorphisms
- NAT2 acetylation
- Associated with bladder cancer with exposure to benzine dyes
- HLA class II genes such as HLA-DQB1*0503
- Associated with toluene diisocyanate-induced occupational asthma
- Polymorphisms in exons 3 of Tyr113His (C113T) and 4 His139Arg (G139A) of the mEH gene
- Associated with organic dust-induced chronic airways disease where the activity of microsomal epoxide hydrolase slows down
- MUC5B promoter polymorphism
Causes by Organ System
| Cardiovascular | No underlying causes |
| Chemical/Poisoning | Orlon, polyesters, nylon, acrylic, vinyl chloride, oxygen, nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, chlorine gas, methyl isocyanate, zinc, copper, manganese, cadmium, iron, magnesium, nickel, brass, selenium, tin, antimony, diphenylmethane diisocyanate, trimellitic anhydride, hydrocarbons, thermosetting resins, toluene diisocyanate, oxygen, mercury, oils, fats and pyrethrum |
| Dental | No underlying causes |
| Dermatologic | No underlying causes |
| Drug Side Effect | No underlying causes |
| Ear Nose Throat | No underlying causes |
| Endocrine | No underlying causes |
| Environmental | Macropolyspora faeni, thermactinomyces vulgaris, thermactinomyces sacchari, aspergillus, cryptostroma corticale, aureobasidium pullulans, penicillium, bacillus subtilis, bacillus cereus, bird droppings, nepheline, and diatomaceous earth |
| Gastroenterologic | No underlying causes |
| Genetic | No underlying causes |
| Hematologic | No underlying causes |
| Iatrogenic | No underlying causes |
| Infectious Disease | Macropolyspora faeni, thermactinomyces vulgaris, thermactinomyces sacchari, aspergillus, cryptostroma corticale, aureobasidium pullulans, penicillium, bacillus subtilis, bacillus cereus, bird droppings, nepheline, and diatomaceous earth |
| Musculoskeletal/Orthopedic | No underlying causes |
| Neurologic | No underlying causes |
| Nutritional/Metabolic | No underlying causes |
| Obstetric/Gynecologic | No underlying causes |
| Oncologic | No underlying causes |
| Ophthalmologic | No underlying causes |
| Overdose/Toxicity | No underlying causes |
| Psychiatric | No underlying causes |
| Pulmonary | No underlying causes |
| Renal/Electrolyte | No underlying causes |
| Rheumatology/Immunology/Allergy | No underlying causes |
| Sexual | No underlying causes |
| Trauma | No underlying causes |
| Urologic | No underlying causes |
| Miscellaneous | Coal dust, graphite, tin, aluminum, cadmium, tungsten, titanium, cobalt, iron, antimony, hematite, mixed dusts of silver and iron oxide, copper sulfate neutralized with hydrated lime, cerium, scandium, yttrium, and lanthanum |
Causes in Alphabetical Order
- Acrylic
- Aluminum
- Aluminum silicates
- Antimony
- Asbestos
- Aspergillus
- Aureobasidium pullulans
- Bacillus cereus
- Bacillus subtilis
- Beryllium
- Bird droppings
- Cadmium
- Cerium
- Chlorine gas
- Coal dust
- Cobalt
- Copper
- Copper sulfate neutralized with hydrated lime
- Cryptostroma corticale
- Diacetyl
- Diatomaceous earth
- Diphenylmethane diisocyanate
- Fats
- Graphite
- Hematite
- Hydrocarbons
- Iron
- Kaolin
- Lanthanum
- Macropolyspora faeni
- Magnesium
- Manganese
- Mercury
- Methyl isocyanate
- Mica
- Nepheline
- Nickel
- Nylon
- Oils
- Orlon
- Oxygen
- Penicillium
- Polyesters
- Portland cement
- Pyrethrum
- Scandium
- Selenium
- Silica
- Sulfur dioxide
- Talc
- Thermactinomyces vulgaris
- Thermoactinomyces sacchari
- Thermosetting resins
- Tin
- Titanium
- Toluene diisocyanate
- Trimellitic anhydride
- Tungsten
- Vinyl chloride
- Yttrium
- Zinc
References
- ↑ Goldman RH, Peters JM (1981). “The occupational and environmental health history”. JAMA. 246 (24): 2831–6. PMID 7310975.
- ↑ Banauch GI, Hall C, Weiden M, Cohen HW, Aldrich TK, Christodoulou V, Arcentales N, Kelly KJ, Prezant DJ (2006). “Pulmonary function after exposure to the World Trade Center collapse in the New York City Fire Department”. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 174 (3): 312–9. doi:10.1164/rccm.200511-1736OC. PMC 2648115. PMID 16645172.
- ↑ Banauch GI, Dhala A, Alleyne D, Alva R, Santhyadka G, Krasko A, Weiden M, Kelly KJ, Prezant DJ (2005). “Bronchial hyperreactivity and other inhalation lung injuries in rescue/recovery workers after the World Trade Center collapse”. Crit. Care Med. 33 (1 Suppl): S102–6. PMID 15640671.
- ↑ Prezant DJ, Weiden M, Banauch GI, McGuinness G, Rom WN, Aldrich TK, Kelly KJ (2002). “Cough and bronchial responsiveness in firefighters at the World Trade Center site”. N. Engl. J. Med. 347 (11): 806–15. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021300. PMID 12226151.
- ↑ Tarlo SM, Lemiere C (2014). “Occupational asthma”. N. Engl. J. Med. 370 (7): 640–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1301758. PMID 24521110.
- ↑ Tarlo SM, Balmes J, Balkissoon R, Beach J, Beckett W, Bernstein D, Blanc PD, Brooks SM, Cowl CT, Daroowalla F, Harber P, Lemiere C, Liss GM, Pacheco KA, Redlich CA, Rowe B, Heitzer J (2008). “Diagnosis and management of work-related asthma: American College Of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement”. Chest. 134 (3 Suppl): 1S–41S. doi:10.1378/chest.08-0201. PMID 18779187.
- ↑ Christiani DC, Mehta AJ, Yu CL (2008). “Genetic susceptibility to occupational exposures”. Occup Environ Med. 65 (6): 430–6, quiz 436, 397. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.033977. PMC 3815576. PMID 18487431.
Differentiating Occupational Lung Disease from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
Occupational lung disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause shortness of breath, cough, and wheeze, such as allergic asthma, emphysema, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, and chronic bronchitis.
Differentiating occupational lung disease from other Diseases
Occupational lung disease must be differentiated from other diseases that cause shortness of breath, cough, and wheeze, such as allergic asthma, emphysema, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, and chronic bronchitis.
Below is a table discussign the differential diagnoses for dyspnea with cough.
Abbreviations: ABG (arterial blood gas); ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme); BMI (body mass index); CBC (complete blood count); CSF (cerebrospinal fluid); CXR (chest X-ray); ECG (electrocardiogram); FEF (forced expiratory flow rate); FEV1 (forced expiratory volume); FVC (forced vital capacity); JVD (jugular vein distention); MCV (mean corpuscular volume); Plt (platelet); RV (residual volume); SIADH (syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone); TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone); Vt (tidal volume); WBC (white blood cell);
References
- ↑ Bernstein JA, Cremonesi P, Hoffmann TK, Hollingsworth J (2017). “Angioedema in the emergency department: a practical guide to differential diagnosis and management”. Int J Emerg Med. 10 (1): 15. doi:10.1186/s12245-017-0141-z. PMC 5389952. PMID 28405953.
- ↑ O’Horo JC, Rogus-Pulia N, Garcia-Arguello L, Robbins J, Safdar N (2015). “Bedside diagnosis of dysphagia: a systematic review”. J Hosp Med. 10 (4): 256–65. doi:10.1002/jhm.2313. PMC 4607509. PMID 25581840.
- ↑ Bjornson CL, Johnson DW (2013). “Croup in children”. CMAJ. 185 (15): 1317–23. doi:10.1503/cmaj.121645. PMC 3796596. PMID 23939212.
- ↑ Negus VE (1927). “The Function of the Epiglottis”. J Anat. 62 (Pt 1): 1–8. PMC 1250045. PMID 17104162.
- ↑ Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL (2011). “Rhinosinusitis diagnosis and management for the clinician: a synopsis of recent consensus guidelines”. Mayo Clin Proc. 86 (5): 427–43. doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0392. PMC 3084646. PMID 21490181.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Wood RP, Milgrom H (September 1996). “Vocal cord dysfunction”. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 98 (3): 481–5. PMID 8828523.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Hodder R, Lougheed MD, Rowe BH, FitzGerald JM, Kaplan AG, McIvor RA (2010). “Management of acute asthma in adults in the emergency department: nonventilatory management”. CMAJ. 182 (2): E55–67. doi:10.1503/cmaj.080072. PMC 2817338. PMID 19858243.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Cantin, Luce; Bankier, Alexander A.; Eisenberg, Ronald L. (2009). “Bronchiectasis”. American Journal of Roentgenology. 193 (3): W158–W171. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3053. ISSN 0361-803X.
- ↑ Molis MA, Molis WE (2010). “Exercise-induced bronchospasm”. Sports Health. 2 (4): 311–7. doi:10.1177/1941738110373735. PMC 3445098. PMID 23015953.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Holbro A, Lehmann T, Girsberger S, Stern M, Gambazzi F, Lardinois D, Heim D, Passweg JR, Tichelli A, Bubendorf L, Savic S, Hostettler K, Grendelmeier P, Halter JP, Tamm M (2013). “Lung histology predicts outcome of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation”. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 19 (6): 973–80. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.03.017. PMID 23562737.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Qureshi H, Sharafkhaneh A, Hanania NA (2014). “Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: latest evidence and clinical implications”. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 5 (5): 212–27. doi:10.1177/2040622314532862. PMC 4131503. PMID 25177479.
- ↑ Dela Cruz CS, Tanoue LT, Matthay RA (2011). “Lung cancer: epidemiology, etiology, and prevention”. Clin Chest Med. 32 (4): 605–44. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2011.09.001. PMC 3864624. PMID 22054876.
- ↑ Simonetti AF, Viasus D, Garcia-Vidal C, Carratalà J (2014). “Management of community-acquired pneumonia in older adults”. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1177/2049936113518041. PMC 4072047. PMID 25165554.
- ↑ Gaggin, Hanna K.; Januzzi, James L. (2013). “Biomarkers and diagnostics in heart failure”. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Molecular Basis of Disease. 1832 (12): 2442–2450. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.12.014. ISSN 0925-4439.
- ↑ Martindale, Jennifer L.; Noble, Vicki E.; Liteplo, Andrew (2013). “Diagnosing pulmonary edema”. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 20 (5): 356–360. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32835c2b88. ISSN 0969-9546.
- ↑ Lane TR, Williamson WJ, Brostoff JM (2008). “Carbon monoxide poisoning in a patient with carbon dioxide retention: a therapeutic challenge”. Cases J. 1 (1): 102. doi:10.1186/1757-1626-1-102. PMC 2533003. PMID 18710551.
- ↑ Schwenk NR, Schapira RM, Byrd JC (November 1994). “Laryngeal carcinoma presenting as platypnea”. Chest. 106 (5): 1609–11. PMID 7956433.
- ↑ Conti V, Calia N, Pasquini C, Zardi S, Finetti C, Stomeo F, Ravenna F (April 2013). “[Chronic cough and worsening dyspnea: a case of idiopathic tracheal stenosis]”. Recenti Prog Med (in Italian). 104 (4): 156–8. doi:10.1701/1271.14026. PMID 23748638.
- ↑ Sharafkhaneh A, Hanania NA, Kim V (2008). “Pathogenesis of emphysema: from the bench to the bedside”. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 5 (4): 475–7. doi:10.1513/pats.200708-126ET. PMC 2645322. PMID 18453358.
- ↑ Sajkov D, Petrovsky N, Palange P (June 2010). “Management of dyspnea in advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension”. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 4 (2): 76–84. doi:10.1097/SPC.0b013e328338c1e0. PMID 20407377.
- ↑ Baughman RP, Shipley RT, Loudon RG, Lower EE (1991). “Crackles in interstitial lung disease. Comparison of sarcoidosis and fibrosing alveolitis”. Chest. 100 (1): 96–101. PMID 2060395.
- ↑ Moher D, Cole CW, Hill GB (November 1992). “Epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysm: the effect of differing definitions”. Eur J Vasc Surg. 6 (6): 647–50. PMID 1451823.
- ↑ Khanna D, Clements PJ, Furst DE, Chon Y, Elashoff R, Roth MD, Sterz MG, Chung J, FitzGerald JD, Seibold JR, Varga J, Theodore A, Wigley FM, Silver RM, Steen VD, Mayes MD, Connolly MK, Fessler BJ, Rothfield NF, Mubarak K, Molitor J, Tashkin DP (February 2005). “Correlation of the degree of dyspnea with health-related quality of life, functional abilities, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide in patients with systemic sclerosis and active alveolitis: results from the Scleroderma Lung Study”. Arthritis Rheum. 52 (2): 592–600. doi:10.1002/art.20787. PMID 15692967.
- ↑ Ziegler, Bruna; Rovedder, Paula Maria Eidt; Dalcin, Paulo de Tarso Roth; Menna-Barreto, Sérgio Saldanha (2009). “Padrões ventilatórios na espirometria em pacientes adolescentes e adultos com fibrose cística”. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia. 35 (9): 854–859. doi:10.1590/S1806-37132009000900006. ISSN 1806-3713.
- ↑ Vodoz JF, Cottin V, Glérant JC, Derumeaux G, Khouatra C, Blanchet AS; et al. (2009). “Right-to-left shunt with hypoxemia in pulmonary hypertension”. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 9: 15. doi:10.1186/1471-2261-9-15. PMC 2671488. PMID 19335916.
- ↑ Dubé BP, Dres M (2016). “Diaphragm Dysfunction: Diagnostic Approaches and Management Strategies”. J Clin Med. 5 (12). doi:10.3390/jcm5120113. PMC 5184786. PMID 27929389.
- ↑ Campbell IA, Bah-Sow O (2006). “Pulmonary tuberculosis: diagnosis and treatment”. BMJ. 332 (7551): 1194–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7551.1194. PMC 1463969. PMID 16709993.
- ↑ Jung HO (2012). “Pericardial effusion and pericardiocentesis: role of echocardiography”. Korean Circ J. 42 (11): 725–34. doi:10.4070/kcj.2012.42.11.725. PMC 3518705. PMID 23236323.
- ↑ Bailey PH (July 2004). “The dyspnea-anxiety-dyspnea cycle–COPD patients’ stories of breathlessness: “It’s scary /when you can’t breathe““. Qual Health Res. 14 (6): 760–78. doi:10.1177/1049732304265973. PMID 15200799.
- ↑ Uyar M, Elbek O, Bakır K, Kibar Y, Bayram N, Dikensoy Ö (2012). “Churg-Strauss syndrome related to montelukast”. Tuberk Toraks. 60 (1): 56–8. PMID 22554368.
- ↑ Cardenas-Garcia J, Farmakiotis D, Baldovino BP, Kim P (2012). “Wegener’s granulomatosis in a middle-aged woman presenting with dyspnea, rash, hemoptysis and recurrent eye complaints: a case report”. J Med Case Rep. 6: 335. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-6-335. PMC 3492078. PMID 23034218.
- ↑ Bal, Amanjit; Das, Ashim; Gupta, Dheeraj; Garg, Mandeep (2014). “Goodpasture’s Syndrome and p-ANCA Associated Vasculitis in a Patient of Silicosiderosis: An Unusual Association”. Case Reports in Pulmonology. 2014: 1–7. doi:10.1155/2014/398238. ISSN 2090-6846.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
Incidence, prevalence and mortality rates for occupational lung disease are not well documented and are unreliable. Individual occupational lung diseases have separate prevalence and incidence rates, such as, farmer’s lung has an incidence of 270 cases per 100,000 in 2012. Whilst the mortality rates for work-related disease are approximately 63,000 deaths in 2012. Disease manifestation is correlated to the frequency, duration and dose of inhalational exposure. Occupational lung disease has no predilection to race or gender, however, males tend to work in environments where exposure is common, therefore more males suffer from occupational lung disease. Occupational lung disease, particularly, coal worker’s pneumoconiosis is a common disease that tends to affect coal miners in West Virginia and Kentucky, USA and South Wales, UK.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Incidence and prevalence
There are no reliable figures for the incidence or prevalence of occupational lung disease.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
- Farmer’s lung:
- The incidence for farmer’s lung was 8-540 cases per 100,000 in 2012.
- Coal worker’s pneumoconiosis and silicosis:
- Among coal workers worldwide:
- 300 per 100, 000 developed coal worker’s pneumonconiosis
- 25 per 100,000 developed progressive massive fibrosis
- In 30 years of exposure, 120 per 100,000 will develop silicosis and 24 per 100,000 will die from silicosis.
- Among coal workers worldwide:
- Asbestosis
- In 1972, it was reported that 250,000 people were at risk in the US.
Case-fatality rate/Mortality rate
- There is no reliable data for the case-fatality rate of occupational lung disease.
- Mortality rates depend on the substance inhaled, as well as the frequency, duration and dose of inhalational exposure.
- Cardiopulmonary and genetic factors of the host also contribute to mortality rate.
- Overall, there was approximately 60,300 deaths from work-related disease in 2012.
Age
Occupational lung disease commonly affects older individuals who have been exposed longer to a particular substance.
Race
There is no racial predilection to occupational lung disease.
Gender
Males are more commonly affected by occupational lung disease than females, reflecting the occupations in which exposure is present.
Region
- Occupational lung disease, particularly, coal worker’s pneumoconiosis is a common disease that tends to affect coal miners in West Virginia and Kentucky, USA and South Wales, UK.
- The United Kingdom, Sweden and France have a high prevalence of farmer’s lung.
- Australia, Japan, South Africa and parts of the European Union still use asbestos as an insulation material.
References
- ↑ Hanak V, Golbin JM, Ryu JH (2007). “Causes and presenting features in 85 consecutive patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis”. Mayo Clin. Proc. 82 (7): 812–6. doi:10.4065/82.7.812. PMID 17605960.
- ↑ Chen S, Yuan J, Yao S, Jin Y, Chen G, Tian W, Xi J, Xu Z, Weng D, Chen J (2015). “Lipopolysaccharides may aggravate apoptosis through accumulation of autophagosomes in alveolar macrophages of human silicosis”. Autophagy. 11 (12): 2346–57. doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1109765. PMC 4835201. PMID 26553601.
- ↑ de Oliveira Abrão C, de Araújo Filho JA (2015). “Mycobacterium sherrisii Lung Infection in a Brazilian Patient with Silicosis and a History of Pulmonary Tuberculosis”. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2015: 498608. doi:10.1155/2015/498608. PMC 4628689. PMID 26557395.
- ↑ Sonnenberg P, Murray J, Glynn JR, Thomas RG, Godfrey-Faussett P, Shearer S (2000). “Risk factors for pulmonary disease due to culture-positive M. tuberculosis or nontuberculous mycobacteria in South African gold miners”. Eur. Respir. J. 15 (2): 291–6. PMID 10706494.
- ↑ “Advanced pneumoconiosis among working underground coal miners–Eastern Kentucky and Southwestern Virginia, 2006”. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 56 (26): 652–5. 2007. PMID 17615522.
- ↑ “Changing patterns of pneumoconiosis mortality–United States, 1968-2000”. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 53 (28): 627–32. 2004. PMID 15269698.
- ↑ Laney AS, Weissman DN (2014). “Respiratory diseases caused by coal mine dust”. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 56 Suppl 10: S18–22. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000260. PMC 4556416. PMID 25285970.
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
Common risk factors in the development of occupational lung disease include smoking, genetic susceptibility, cardiovascular disease, and frequency, intensity, and duration of exposure.
Risk Factors
- The higher the duration, frequency, and intensity of exposure leads to an increased risk in developing occupational lung disease.[1]
- Common risk factors in the development of occupational lung disease include:
- Smoking
- Weakens the immune system and leaves the body defenseless against inhaled substances
- Cardiovascular disease
- Also causes immunocompromisation
- Pre-existing lung disease
- Also causes immunocompromisation
- Alcohol use
- Also causes immunocompromisation
- Genetics
- Explains the variability in symptoms, presentation, susceptibility, and progression
- Obesity
- Higher risk of asthma and cardiovascular disease
- Smoking
References
- ↑ Schulte PA, Pandalai S, Wulsin V, Chun H (2012). “Interaction of occupational and personal risk factors in workforce health and safety”. Am J Public Health. 102 (3): 434–48. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300249. PMC 3487655. PMID 22021293.
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for occupational lung disease at a national level, however, at a local level workers with known occupational hazards benefit from a routine screening at their places of work.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for occupational lung disease at a national level, however, at a local level workers with known occupational hazards may benefit from routine screening at their places of work. Routine screening may include:[1][2]
- Questionnaire (including exposure assessment)
- X ray of the chest
- Spirometry
- Referral to chest clinic/specialized service for investigation and management, including:
- Detailed history of non‐occupational factors
- Pulmonary function testing
- Blood tests
- Including CBC
- Sputum analysis
- CT
- Bronchoscopy
References
- ↑ Weissman DN (2015). “Role of chest computed tomography in prevention of occupational respiratory disease: review of recent literature”. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 36 (3): 433–48. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1547348. PMC 4672247. PMID 26024350.
- ↑ Nissan M, Rubin AE, Cugell DW, Gavriely N (1990). “[A respiratory health questionnaire for occupational screening]”. Harefuah (in Hebrew). 119 (5–6): 132–4. PMID 2227685.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
If left untreated, patients with occupational lung disease may progress to develop pleural effusion, interstitial lung fibrosis, and lung cancer. Common complications of of occupational lung disease include interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, progressive massive fibrosis, mesothelioma, and premature death. Depending on the extent of the disease progression at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as poor.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
Natural History
- The symptoms of occupational lung disease usually develop on average in the third decade of life, and start with symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue, and cough.[1]
- The symptoms of occupational lung disease typically develop 30 years after exposure to an inhalant.
- If left untreated, 30% of patients with occupational lung disease may progress to develop pleural effusion, interstitial lung fibrosis, and lung cancer.
Complications
Prognosis
- Depending on the extent of the disease progression at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary. However, the prognosis is generally regarded as poor.[4]
- The presence of fibrosis is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with occupational lung disease.
References
- ↑ Turcotte SE, Chee A, Walsh R, Grant FC, Liss GM, Boag A, Forkert L, Munt PW, Lougheed MD (2013). “Flock worker’s lung disease: natural history of cases and exposed workers in Kingston, Ontario”. Chest. 143 (6): 1642–1648. doi:10.1378/chest.12-0920. PMID 23699830.
- ↑ Dumas O, Despreaux T, Perros F, Lau E, Andujar P, Humbert M, Montani D, Descatha A (2018). “Respiratory effects of trichloroethylene”. Respir Med. 134: 47–53. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2017.11.021. PMID 29413507.
- ↑ Baur X (2018). “Asbestos-Related Disorders in Germany: Background, Politics, Incidence, Diagnostics and Compensation”. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15 (1). doi:10.3390/ijerph15010143. PMC 5800242. PMID 29337930.
- ↑ Gouvinhas C, De Mello RA, Oliveira D, Castro-Lopes JM, Castelo-Branco P, Dos Santos RS, Hespanhol V, Pozza DH (2018). “Lung cancer: a brief review of epidemiology and screening”. Future Oncol. doi:10.2217/fon-2017-0486. PMID 29417838.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | EKG | X ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH
