Neurofibroma
For patient information click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2], Kiran Singh, M.D. [3], Shanshan Cen, M.D. [4]
Synonyms and keywords: Endoneural fibroma, Myxofibroma of nerve sheath, Neurofibromyxoma, Perineural fibroblastoma, Perineural fibroma
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2], Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]
Overview
Neurofibromas are benign nerve sheath tumors of neural origin in peripheral nervous system, comprising all elements of the peripheral nerve (i.e. axons, Schwann cells and fibroblasts) and can occur anywhere in the body. Neurofibromas may occur as part of the syndrome of neurofibromatosis (most common), solitary neurofibromas, or multiple neurofibromas without von Recklinghausen’s disease (NF-1). Neurofibroma may be classified into further subtypes such as localized, cutaneous, subcutaneous, intraneural, intramuscular, diffuse, pigmented, and plexiform neurofibroma. However, plexiform neurofibroma can be further subclassified into diffuse, and nodular plexiform neurofibroma. Gene involved in the pathogenesis of plexiform neurofibroma is NF1 which codes for neurofibromin that leads to loss of RAS control causing increased activity of downstream RAS pathways involved in increased cell growth and survival. On gross pathology, a non-encapsulated superficial mass is the characteristic finding of localized or diffuse neurofibroma; whereas the “bag of worms” appearance is the characteristic finding of plexiform neurofibroma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, nerve fibers, schwann cells, spindle cells with wavy nuclei without pleomorphism, shredded carrot collagen, moderate increase of cellularity vis-a-vis normal dermis, blood vessels, mast cells, pseudomeissnerian bodies, and varying degrees of myxoid degeneration are characteristic findings of neurofibroma. However, plexiform neurofibroma shows a characteristic target sign on histopathology. It usually affects both men and women equally between the age of 20-40 years. Common symptoms of neurofibroma include soft masses, transient itching, and transient pain with rest of the symptoms depending upon the involved site. There is no single diagnostic study of choice for neurofibroma, instead, it is diagnosed on the basis of medical history, physical examination, and imaging studies such as CT or MRI. The predominant therapy for neurofibroma is surgical resection. Adjunctive chemotherapy and medications such as ACE inhibitors may be required. Prognosis of neurofibroma is generally excellent. If left untreated, 10% of patients with plexiform neurofibromas may progress to develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Local recurrence occurs rarely.
Historical Perspective
NF1-like cutaneous tumor syndromes appeared in the literature in 1880s, when Friedrich von Recklinghausen published seminal observations detailing cutaneous tumors comprised of both neuronal and fibroblastic tissue finally termed as neurofibromas. In 2006, Yang et al demonstrated a critical neurofibroma microenvironment interaction that includes SCF–stimulated Nf1+/− mast cells potentiating Nf1+/− fibroblast functions.
Classification
Neurofibroma may be classified into 5 subtypes: cutaneous/dermal/localized, localized intraneural, subcutaneous, diffuse, intramuscular, plexiform and pigmented neurofibroma. Plexiform neurofibromas may be further sub-classified into diffuse and nodular plexiform.
Pathophysiology
Neurofibromas arise from the nonmyelinating-type Schwann cells. Gene involved in the pathogenesis of plexiform neurofibroma is NF1 which codes for neurofibromin that leads to loss of RAS control causing increased activity of downstream RAS pathways involved in increased cell growth and survival. Neurofibromas can occur anywhere in body. On gross pathology, a nonencapsulated superficial mass is the characteristic finding of localised or diffuseneurofibroma; whereas the “bag of worms” appearance is the characteristic finding of plexiform neurofibroma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, nerve fibers, schwann cells, spindle cells with wavy nuclei without pleomorphism, shredded carrot collagen, moderate increase of cellularity vis-a-vis normal dermis, blood vessels, mast cells, pseudomeissnerian bodies, and varying degrees of myxoid degeneration are characteristic findings of neurofibroma. However, plexiform neurofibroma shows a characteristic target sign on histopathology, representing a central core of collagenous and fibrillary tissue with peripheral less denselycellular myxoid tissue. Electron microscopy of neurofibromas shows Schwann cells enclosing axons in plasmalemmal invaginations (mesaxons).
Causes
Plexiform neurofibroma may be caused by the bi-allelic inactivation of the neurofibromatosis type I tumor suppressor gene.
Differential Diagnosis
Neurofibroma must be differentiated from schwannoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), ganglioneuroma, dermal neurotized melanocytic nevus, myxoid liposarcoma, solitary circumscribed neuroma, traumatic neuroma, superficial angiomyxoma, nerve sheath myxoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, spindle cell lipoma, leiomyoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and fibroepithelial polyp.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Neurofibroma usually occurs between 20-40 years of age, and affects men and women equally. However, plexiform neurofibromas are thought to be congenital defects, hence, they occur earlier in life.
Risk Factors
Neurofibromatosis 1 and Neurofibromatosis 2 are the most common risk factors for development of neurofibromas.
Screening
According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for neurofibroma.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Prognosis of neurofibroma is generally excellent. If left untreated, 10% of patients with plexiform neurofibromas may progress to develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Local recurrence occurs rarely.
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice
There is no single diagnostic study of choice for neurofibroma, instead, it is diagnosed on the basis of medical history, physical examination, and imaging studiessuch as CT or MRI.
Staging
There is no established system for the staging of neurofibroma.
History and symptoms
Neurofibromas can form anywhere in body with diffuse neurofibromas commonly involving scalp. Symptoms of neurofibroma include soft masses/bumps (internal or superficial) , transient itching, pain, numbness and tingling in the affected area, severe bleeding, physical disfiguration, cognitive disability, stinging, neurological deficits, changes in movement (clumsiness in the hands, trouble walking), bowel incontinence, scoliosis, UTI, urinary retention, urgency, frequency, urinary incontinence, hematuria, hydronephrosis, or pelvic mass.
Physical Examination
Physical examination of patients with neurofibroma is usually remarkable for soft masses (internal or superficial).
Laboratory Findings
On Immunohistochemistry, neurofibroma stains positive for S100, SOX10, CD34, factor XIIIa, neurofilament, GFAP and calretinin and negative for EMA, keratin, smooth muscle actin, desmin, calponin, caldesmon and p53.
X Ray
There are no X-ray findings associated with neurofibroma.
CT Scan
CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma. Findings on CT scan suggestive of neurofibroma include a well-defined, round or oval hypodense, fusiform mass representing the nerve entering and exiting the tumor. Low attenuation is attributed to high lipid or water content within the mucinous matrix, entrapment of perineural adipose tissue and cystic degeneration.
MRI
MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma. It appears as a hypointense, homogeneous low signal intensity lesion with center demonstrating a higher signal intensity than the periphery on T1. T2 weighted images show hyperintense, homogeneous lesion with positive target sign and fascicular sign. Moreover, neurofibromas have heterogeneous enhancement on T1 C+ (Gd) (with gadolinium contrast).
Ultrasound
There are no ultrasound findings associated with neurofibroma.
Other Imaging Findings
There are no other imaging findings associated with neurofibroma.
Other Diagnostic Studies
There are no other diagnostic study findings associated with neurofibroma.
Biopsy
Biopsy is helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
The predominant therapy for neurofibroma is surgical resection. Adjunctive chemotherapy and medications such as ACE inhibitors may be required.
Surgery
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for neurofibroma. Localized and diffuse lesions are usually treated surgically. Neurofibromas that infiltrate between nervefascicles are unable to be separated from the parent nerve, therefore, deep-seated lesions are often managed conservatively. Local recurrence after excision is uncommon .and malignant transformation occurs rarely.
Primary Prevention
There is no established method for primary prevention of neurofibroma.
Secondary Prevention
There are no secondary preventive measures available for neurofibroma.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]
Overview
NF1-like cutaneous tumor syndromes appeared in the literature in 1880s, when Friedrich von Recklinghausen published seminal observations detailing cutaneous tumors comprised of both neuronal and fibroblastic tissue finally termed as neurofibromas. In 2006, Yang et al demonstrated a critical neurofibroma microenvironment interaction that includes SCF–stimulated Nf1+/− mast cells potentiating Nf1+/− fibroblast functions.
Historical Perspective
- In 18th century, NF1-like cutaneous tumor syndromes appeared in the literature.[1]
- In 1880s, Friedrich von Recklinghausen published seminal observations detailing cutaneous tumors comprised of both neuronal and fibroblastic tissue finally termed as neurofibromas.
- In 2006, Yang et al demonstrated a critical neurofibroma microenvironment interaction that includes SCF–stimulated Nf1+/− mast cells potentiating Nf1+/− fibroblast functions.[2]
References
- ↑ Morse RP (1999). “Neurofibromatosis type 1”. Arch Neurol. 56 (3): 364–5. PMID 10190829.
- ↑ Staser, Karl; Yang, Feng-Chun; Clapp, D. Wade (2010). “Mast cells and the neurofibroma microenvironment”. Blood. 116 (2): 157–164. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-242875. ISSN 0006-4971.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]
Overview
Neurofibroma may be classified into 5 subtypes: cutaneous/dermal/localized, localized intraneural, subcutaneous, diffuse, intramuscular, plexiform and pigmented neurofibroma. Plexiform neurofibromas may be further sub-classified into diffuse and nodular plexiform.
Classification
Neurofibroma may be classified into following subtypes:[1][2]
| Types of neurofibromas | Characteristics/Description |
|---|---|
| Cutaneous/Dermal/Localized/Sporadic neurofibroma (90%) |
|
| Localized Intraneural neurofibroma | |
| Subcutaneous neurofibroma |
|
| Diffuse neurofibroma |
|
| Intramuscular neurofibroma | |
| Plexiform neurofibroma
(deep) |
|
| Pigmented neurofibroma |
|
Plexiform neurofibromas can be further subclassified into following:
| Types of neurofibromas | Characteristics/Description |
|---|---|
| Diffuse Plexiform neurofibroma | |
| Nodular Plexiform neurofibroma |
|
References
- ↑ Wilkinson, Lana M.; Manson, David; Smith, Charles R. (2004). “Best Cases from the AFIP”. RadioGraphics. 24 (suppl_1): S237–S242. doi:10.1148/rg.24si035170. ISSN 0271-5333.
- ↑ https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.24si035170#REF8
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]
Overview
Neurofibromas arise from the nonmyelinating-type Schwann cells and can occur anywhere in the body. Gene involved in the pathogenesis of plexiform neurofibroma is NF1 which codes for neurofibromin that leads to loss of RAS control causing increased activity of downstream RAS pathways involved in increased cell growth and survival. Plexiform neurofibroma may be caused by the bi-allelic inactivation of the neurofibromatosis type I tumor suppressor gene. On gross pathology, a nonencapsulated superficial mass is the characteristic finding of localised or diffuse neurofibroma; whereas the “bag of worms” appearance is the characteristic finding of plexiform neurofibroma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, nerve fibers, schwann cells, spindle cells with wavy nuclei without pleomorphism, shredded carrot collagen, moderate increase of cellularity vis-a-vis normal dermis, blood vessels, mast cells, pseudomeissnerian bodies, and varying degrees of myxoid degeneration are characteristic findings of neurofibroma. However, plexiform neurofibroma shows a characteristic target sign on histopathology, representing a central core of collagenous and fibrillary tissue with peripheral less densely cellular myxoid tissue. Electron microscopy of neurofibromas shows Schwann cells enclosing axons in plasmalemmal invaginations (mesaxons).
Pathogenesis
- Neurofibromas arise from the nonmyelinating-type Schwann cells.[1][2][3]
- Plexiform neurofibromas can grow from nerves in the skin or from more internal nerve bundles, and can be very large.
- About 10% of plexiform neurofibromas undergo transformation into a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST).[4]
- In 2006, Yang et al demonstrated a critical neurofibroma microenvironment interaction that includes SCF–stimulated Nf1+/− mast cells potentiating Nf1+/− fibroblast functions.[5]
- Nearly one-half of the dry tumor weight is made up of collagen secreted by fibroblasts, which comprise the major cellular portion of neurofibroma.
- Fibroblasts migrate, proliferate, and synthesize collagen in response to transforming growth factor β (TGF-β).
- Fibroblast bioactivity is TGF-β dependent.
- Nf1+/− mast cell is the critical effector in the paracrine induction of neurofibroma pathogenesis.
- TGF-β–dependent Nf1+/− fibroblast hyperactivity is a result of increased kinase activity of c-abl secondary to increased Ras–GTP.
Genetics
- Gene involved in the pathogenesis of plexiform neurofibroma is NF1.
- The NF1 gene is composed of 60 exons spanning 350kb of genomic data, and maps to chromosomal region 17q11.2.[6]
- This gene codes for neurofibromin which is a large 220-250 KDa cytoplasmic protein that is composed of 2,818 amino acids with three alternatively spliced exons (9a, 23a, and 48a) in the encoding gene.
- The functional part of neurofibromin is GAP, or GTPase-activating protein.
- GAP accelerates the conversion of the active GTP-bound RAS to its inactive GDP-bound form, inactivating RAS and reducing RAS-mediated growth signaling.
- Loss of RAS control leads to increased activity of other signaling pathways including RAF, ERK1/2, PI3K, PAK, MAPK, SCF/c-kit and mTOR-S6 kinase. It is suspected that this increased activity of downstream RAS pathways might work together to increase cell growth and survival.[7][8]
Gross Pathology
- Neurofibromas can occur anywhere in body. Gross features of different types of neurofibromas include the following:
Localised neurofibroma and Diffuse neurofibroma
- Superficial mass
- Not encapsulated
Soft tissue neurofibroma
- Not encapsulated, softer (more gelatinous) than schwannoma.
- Superficial tumors are small, pedunculated nodules protruding from skin (molluscum pendulum).
- Deeper tumors are larger, may cause tortuous enlargement of peripheral nerves (plexiform neurofibromas).
Plexiform neurofibroma
- “Bag of worms” appearance[9]
- Associated with grossly enlarged and tortuous nerves
- Deep tumors are often large
- Highly vascularized and locally invasive
Microscopic Pathology
- Made of nerve fibers, schwann cells (cells that cover the nerve fibers), blood vessels, inflammatory white blood cells (mast cells), and connective tissue (fibroblasts and loose material called extracellular matrix)
- Multiple enlarged fascicles of randomly oriented thin spindled nerve sheath cells are embeded in a stromal mucin and wire-like collageneous matrix within fibrous connective tissue[2]
- Spindle cells have hyperchromatic, elongated, wavy, buckled, small and bland nuclei with indistinct scant cytoplasm
- No pleomorphism
- Tactile-like bodies are also detected
- Varying degrees of myxoid degeneration
- Unencapsulated
- Moderate increase of cellularity vis-a-vis normal dermis
- Uniphasic, low to moderate cellularity (generally hypocellular)
- Occasional mast cells, and lymphocytes, rare foam cells.[3]
- Thin and thick collagen strands (“shredded carrot collagen”)
- Nerve fibers run through a neurofibroma (making excision more difficult with increased likelihood of nerve damage)
- Nerve frequently not grossly identifiable
- Features of specific differentiation (e.g. pseudomeissnerian bodies) may be present occassionally
- Low mitotic index
- No clear division between Antoni A and B areas within the tumor
- No well formed verocy bodies
- No epithelial component
- No distinct lobulation
- Seldom cystic
- Cellularity and organization are generally insufficient to produce palisading
Neurofibroma with Degenerative Atypia (“Ancient change”)
- Localized hyperchromatic atypical cells (“ancient change“) with:
- Large, pleomorphic nuclei
- Cytoplasmic intranuclear inclusions
- Smudgy chromatin
- Inconspicuous nucleoli
- Absent or very low mitotic activity
- Low to moderate cellularity
- Often large, long standing lesions
Soft tissue neurofibromas
- Proliferation of all elements of peripheral nerves.
- Schwann cells with wire like collagen fibrils (wavy serpentine nuclei, pointed ends), stromal mucosubstances, mast cells, Wagner-Meissner corpuscles, Pacinian corpuscles, axons (highlight with silver or acetylcholinesterase stain, NSE, neurofilament), fibroblasts and collagen.
- Perineurial cells in plexiform types, mitotic figures are rare.
- Less of a fascicular pattern than fibromatosis.
- May be infiltrative, have myxoid areas, contain melanin pigment, have epitheloid morphology.
- Rarely has skeletal differentiation (neuromuscular hamartoma).
- No Verocay bodies
- No nuclear palisading
- No hyalinized thickening of vessel walls
Plexiform neurofibromas
- Nodular or diffuse
- Diffuse cases are also known as elephantiasis neurofibromatosa; characterized by an overgrowth of epidermal and subcutaneous tissue.
- Hypocellular with myxoid background; contains Schwann cells, fibroblasts and mast cells
- Occasional nuclear palisading
- Rarely is pigmented due to melanocytes
- No biphasic pattern of schwannoma
- Target sign on histopathology represents a central core made up of collagenous and fibrillary tissue with peripheral less densely cellular myxoid tissue.[10]
Electron microscopy
- Schwann cells enclose axons in plasmalemmal invaginations (mesaxons).
References
- ↑ Muir D, Neubauer D, Lim IT, Yachnis AT, Wallace MR. (2003). “Tumorigenic properties of neurofibromin-deficient neurofibroma Schwann cells”. American Journal of Pathology. 158 (2): 501–13. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63992-2. PMC 1850316. PMID 11159187.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Bernthal, NM.; Jones, KB.; Monument, MJ.; Liu, T.; Viskochil, D.; Randall, RL. (2013). “Lost in translation: ambiguity in nerve sheath tumor nomenclature and its resultant treatment effect”. Cancers (Basel). 5 (2): 519–28. doi:10.3390/cancers5020519. PMID 24216989.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Staser, K.; Yang, FC.; Clapp, DW. (2010). “Mast cells and the neurofibroma microenvironment”. Blood. 116 (2): 157–64. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-242875. PMID 20233971. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Mautner VF, Friedrich RE, von Deimling A, Hagel C, Korf B, Knöfel MT, Wenzel R, Fünsterer C. (2003). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: MRI supports the diagnosis of malignant plexiform neurofibroma”. American Journal of Pathology. 45 (9): 618–25. doi:10.1007/s00234-003-0964-6. PMID 12898075.
- ↑ http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/116/2/157?sso-checked=true
- ↑ MH Shen, PS Harper, M Upadhyaya. (1996). “Molecular genetics of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)”. Journal of Medical Genetics. 33 (1): 2–17. doi:10.1136/jmg.33.1.2. PMC 1051805. PMID 8825042.
- ↑ Rubin JB, Gutmann DH. (2005). “Neurofibromatosis type 1 – a model for nervous system tumour formation?”. Nature Reviews Cancer. 5 (7): 557–64. doi:10.1038/nrc1653. PMID 16069817.
- ↑ Johnson MR, Look AT, DeClue JE, Valentine MB, Lowy DR. (1993). “Inactivation of the NF1 gene in human melanoma and neuroblastoma cell lines without impaired regulation of GTP.Ras”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 90 (12): 5539–43. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.12.5539. PMC 46756. PMID 8516298.
- ↑ Wilkinson LM, Manson D, Smith CR (2004). “Best cases from the AFIP: plexiform neurofibroma of the bladder”. Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 24 Suppl 1: S237–42. doi:10.1148/rg.24si035170. PMID 15486243. Retrieved 2015-11-13.
- ↑ https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.24si035170#REF8
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2] Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]
Overview
Plexiform neurofibroma may be caused by the bi-allelic inactivation of the neurofibromatosis type I tumor suppressor gene.
Causes
Plexiform neurofibroma may be caused by the bi-allelic inactivation of the neurofibromatosis type I tumor suppressor gene.[1]
References
- ↑ Colman SD, Williams CA, Wallace MR (1995). “Benign neurofibromas in type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1) show somatic deletions of the NF1 gene”. Nature Genetics. 11 (1): 90–2. doi:10.1038/ng0995-90. PMID 7550323. Retrieved 2015-11-16.
Differentiating Neurofibroma from other Diseases
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]
Overview
Neurofibroma must be differentiated from schwannoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), ganglioneuroma, dermal neurotized melanocytic nevus, myxoid liposarcoma, solitary circumscribed neuroma, traumatic neuroma, superficial angiomyxoma, nerve sheath myxoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, spindle cell lipoma, leiomyoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and fibroepithelial polyp.
Differential Diagnosis
Neurofibroma must be differentiated from:
- Schwannoma
- Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP)
- Ganglioneuroma
- Dermal neurotized melanocytic nevus
- Myxoid liposarcoma
- Solitary circumscribed neuroma/palisaded encapsulated neuroma
- Traumatic neuroma
- Superficial angiomyxoma
- Nerve sheath myxoma
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST)/malignant schwannoma
- Spindle cell lipoma
- Leiomyoma
- Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor
- Fibroepithelial polyp/acrochordon (aka skin tag or soft fibroma)
References
- ↑ Rodriguez, Fausto J.; Folpe, Andrew L.; Giannini, Caterina; Perry, Arie (2012). “Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems”. Acta Neuropathologica. 123 (3): 295–319. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-0954-z. ISSN 0001-6322.
- ↑ Choi, Kwangmin; Komurov, Kakajan; Fletcher, Jonathan S.; Jousma, Edwin; Cancelas, Jose A.; Wu, Jianqiang; Ratner, Nancy (2017). “An inflammatory gene signature distinguishes neurofibroma Schwann cells and macrophages from cells in the normal peripheral nervous system”. Scientific Reports. 7 (1). doi:10.1038/srep43315. ISSN 2045-2322.
- ↑ Liao, Chung-Ping; Booker, Reid C.; Brosseau, Jean-Philippe; Chen, Zhiguo; Mo, Juan; Tchegnon, Edem; Wang, Yong; Clapp, D. Wade; Le, Lu Q. (2018). “Contributions of inflammation and tumor microenvironment to neurofibroma tumorigenesis”. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 128 (7): 2848–2861. doi:10.1172/JCI99424. ISSN 0021-9738.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Staser, K.; Yang, F.-C.; Clapp, D. W. (2010). “Mast cells and the neurofibroma microenvironment”. Blood. 116 (2): 157–164. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-242875. ISSN 0006-4971.
- ↑ Muir, David; Neubauer, Debbie; Lim, Ingrid T.; Yachnis, Anthony T.; Wallace, Margaret R. (2001). “Tumorigenic Properties of Neurofibromin-Deficient Neurofibroma Schwann Cells”. The American Journal of Pathology. 158 (2): 501–513. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63992-2. ISSN 0002-9440.
- ↑ Wilkinson, Lana M.; Manson, David; Smith, Charles R. (2004). “Best Cases from the AFIP”. RadioGraphics. 24 (suppl_1): S237–S242. doi:10.1148/rg.24si035170. ISSN 0271-5333.
- ↑ Bernthal, Nicholas; Jones, Kevin; Monument, Michael; Liu, Ting; Viskochil, David; Randall, R. (2013). “Lost in Translation: Ambiguity in Nerve Sheath Tumor Nomenclature and Its Resultant Treatment Effect”. Cancers. 5 (4): 519–528. doi:10.3390/cancers5020519. ISSN 2072-6694.
- ↑ Mautner, V. F.; Friedrich, R. E.; von Deimling, A.; Hagel, C.; Korf, B.; Knöfel, M. T.; Wenzel, R.; Fünsterer, C. (2003). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: MRI supports the diagnosis of malignant plexiform neurofibroma”. Neuroradiology. 45 (9): 618–625. doi:10.1007/s00234-003-0964-6. ISSN 0028-3940.
- ↑ Shen, M H; Harper, P S; Upadhyaya, M (1996). “Molecular genetics of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)”. Journal of Medical Genetics. 33 (1): 2–17. doi:10.1136/jmg.33.1.2. ISSN 1468-6244.
- ↑ Rubin, Joshua B.; Gutmann, David H. (2005). “Neurofibromatosis type 1 — a model for nervous system tumour formation?”. Nature Reviews Cancer. 5 (7): 557–564. doi:10.1038/nrc1653. ISSN 1474-175X.
- ↑ Gray, Mark H. (1990). “Immunohistochemical Demonstration of Factor XIIIa Expression in Neurofibromas”. Archives of Dermatology. 126 (4): 472. doi:10.1001/archderm.1990.01670280056009. ISSN 0003-987X.
- ↑ Schwannoma. Dr Tim Luijkx and Dr Sara Wein et al. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/schwannoma
- ↑ Vestibular Schwannoma. Wikipedia(2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestibular_schwannoma Accessed on October 2 2015
- ↑ Giordano J, Rogers LV (1989). “Peripherally administered serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists reduce inflammatory pain in rats”. European Journal of Pharmacology. 170 (1–2): 83–6. PMID 2612565.
|access-date=requires|url=(help) - ↑ Kolvenbach H, Lauven PM, Schneider B, Kunath U (1989). “Repetitive intercostal nerve block via catheter for postoperative pain relief after thoracotomy”. The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon. 37 (5): 273–6. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1020331. PMID 2588243. Retrieved 2015-11-20.
- ↑ Opaleva-Stegantseva VA, Ivanov AG, Gavrilina IA, Khar’kov EI, Ratovskaia VI (1986). “[Incidence of sudden death cases in acute coronary insufficiency and acute myocardial infarction at the pre-hospital stage in Krasnoyarsk]”. Kardiologiia (in Russian). 26 (5): 23–6. PMID 3735913.
|access-date=requires|url=(help) - ↑ Misago N, Inoue T, Narisawa Y (2007). “Unusual benign myxoid nerve sheath lesion: myxoid palisaded encapsulated neuroma (PEN) or nerve sheath myxoma with PEN/PEN-like features?”. Am J Dermatopathol. 29 (2): 160–4. doi:10.1097/01.dad.0000256688.91974.09. PMID 17414438.
- ↑ Lee EJ, Calcaterra TC, Zuckerbraun L (1998). “Traumatic neuromas of the head and neck”. Ear Nose Throat J. 77 (8): 670–4, 676. PMID 9745184.
- ↑ Hanna SA, Catapano J, Borschel GH (2016). “Painful pediatric traumatic neuroma: surgical management and clinical outcomes”. Childs Nerv Syst. 32 (7): 1191–4. doi:10.1007/s00381-016-3109-z. PMID 27179535.
- ↑ Foltán R, Klíma K, Spacková J, Sedý J (2008). “Mechanism of traumatic neuroma development”. Med Hypotheses. 71 (4): 572–6. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.05.010. PMID 18599222.
- ↑ Yao C, Zhou X, Zhao B, Sun C, Poonit K, Yan H (2017). “Treatments of traumatic neuropathic pain: a systematic review”. Oncotarget. 8 (34): 57670–57679. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16917. PMC 5593675. PMID 28915703.
- ↑ Gray MH, Smoller BR, McNutt NS, Hsu A (1990). “Neurofibromas and neurotized melanocytic nevi are immunohistochemically distinct neoplasms”. Am J Dermatopathol. 12 (3): 234–41. PMID 1693815.
- ↑ Chen Y, Klonowski PW, Lind AC, Lu D (2012). “Differentiating neurotized melanocytic nevi from neurofibromas using Melan-A (MART-1) immunohistochemical stain”. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 136 (7): 810–5. doi:10.5858/arpa.2011-0335-OA. PMID 22742554.
- ↑ Singh N, Chandrashekar L, Kar R, Sylvia MT, Thappa DM (2015). “Neurotized congenital melanocytic nevus resembling a pigmented neurofibroma”. Indian J Dermatol. 60 (1): 46–50. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.147789. PMC 4318062. PMID 25657396.
- ↑ Gray MH, Smoller BR, McNutt NS, Hsu A (1990). “Immunohistochemical demonstration of factor XIIIa expression in neurofibromas. A practical means of differentiating these tumors from neurotized melanocytic nevi and schwannomas”. Arch Dermatol. 126 (4): 472–6. PMID 1690969.
- ↑ https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/cutaneous-myxoma
- ↑ Alaiti, Samer; Nelson, Fern P.; Ryoo, Jei W. (2000). “Solitary cutaneous myxoma”. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 43 (2): 377–379. doi:10.1067/mjd.2000.101878. ISSN 0190-9622.
- ↑ Carney, J. Aidan (1986). “Cutaneous Myxomas”. Archives of Dermatology. 122 (7): 790. doi:10.1001/archderm.1986.01660190068018. ISSN 0003-987X.
- ↑ Iida, Ken; Egi, Takeshi; Shigi, Masato; Sogabe, Yusuke; Ohashi, Hirotsugu (2019). “Cutaneous Myxoma of Multiple Lesions”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open. 7 (2): e2040. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002040. ISSN 2169-7574.
- ↑ Fetsch JF, Laskin WB, Miettinen M (2005). “Nerve sheath myxoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 57 morphologically distinctive, S-100 protein- and GFAP-positive, myxoid peripheral nerve sheath tumors with a predilection for the extremities and a high local recurrence rate”. Am J Surg Pathol. 29 (12): 1615–24. PMID 16327434.
- ↑ Yadav SK, Singh S, Sarin N, Naeem R, Pruthi SK (2019). “Nerve Sheath Myxoma of Scalp: A Rare Site of Presentation”. Int J Trichology. 11 (1): 34–37. doi:10.4103/ijt.ijt_45_18. PMC 6385516. PMID 30820132.
- ↑ Bhat A, Narasimha A, C V, Vk S (2015). “Nerve sheath myxoma: report of a rare case”. J Clin Diagn Res. 9 (4): ED07–9. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/10911.5810. PMC 4437072. PMID 26023558.
- ↑ Avninder S, Ramesh V, Vermani S (2007). “Benign nerve sheath myxoma (myxoid neurothekeoma) in the leg”. Dermatol Online J. 13 (2): 14. PMID 17498433.
- ↑ Kim BW, Won CH, Chang SE, Lee MW (2014). “A case of nerve sheath myxoma on finger”. Indian J Dermatol. 59 (1): 99–101. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.123526. PMC 3884944. PMID 24470676.
- ↑ Pulitzer DR, Reed RJ (1985). “Nerve-sheath myxoma (perineurial myxoma)”. Am J Dermatopathol. 7 (5): 409–21. PMID 4091218.
- ↑ Valeyrie-Allanore, L.; Ismaili, N.; Bastuji-Garin, S.; Zeller, J.; Wechsler, J.; Revuz, J.; Wolkenstein, P. (2005). “Symptoms associated with malignancy of peripheral nerve sheath tumours: a retrospective study of 69 patients with neurofibromatosis 1”. British Journal of Dermatology. 153 (1): 79–82. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06558.x. ISSN 0007-0963.
- ↑ Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, Sharif S, Howard E, Moran A (2002). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1”. J Med Genet. 39 (5): 311–4. PMC 1735122. PMID 12011145.
- ↑ Panigrahi S, Mishra SS, Das S, Dhir MK (2013). “Primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor at unusual location”. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 4 (Suppl 1): S83–6. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.116480. PMC 3808069. PMID 24174807.
- ↑ Ferrari A, Bisogno G, Carli M (2007). “Management of childhood malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor”. Paediatr Drugs. 9 (4): 239–48. doi:10.2165/00148581-200709040-00005. PMID 17705563.
- ↑ Neville H, Corpron C, Blakely ML, Andrassy R (2003). “Pediatric neurofibrosarcoma”. J Pediatr Surg. 38 (3): 343–6, discussion 343-6. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2003.50105. PMID 12632346.
- ↑ Zehou, Ouidad; Fabre, Elizabeth; Zelek, Laurent; Sbidian, Emilie; Ortonne, Nicolas; Banu, Eugeniu; Wolkenstein, Pierre; Valeyrie-Allanore, Laurence (2013). “Chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis 1: a 10-year institutional review”. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 8 (1): 127. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-8-127. ISSN 1750-1172.
- ↑ Vasiliadis, K.; Papavasiliou, C.; Fachiridis, D.; Pervana, S.; Michaelides, M.; Kiranou, M.; Makridis, C. (2012). “Retroperitoneal extra-adrenal ganglioneuroma involving the infrahepatic inferior vena cava, celiac axis and superior mesenteric artery: A case report”. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 3 (11): 541–543. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2012.07.008. ISSN 2210-2612.
- ↑ https://radiopaedia.org/articles/ganglioneuroma
- ↑ Khin Thway, Rashpal Flora, Chirag Shah, David Olmos & Cyril Fisher (2012). “Diagnostic utility of p16, CDK4, and MDM2 as an immunohistochemical panel in distinguishing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas from other adipocytic tumors”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 36 (3): 462–469. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182417330. PMID 22301498. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ J. Rosai, M. Akerman, P. Dal Cin, I. DeWever, C. D. Fletcher, N. Mandahl, F. Mertens, F. Mitelman, A. Rydholm, R. Sciot, G. Tallini, H. Van den Berghe, W. Van de Ven, R. Vanni & H. Willen (1996). “Combined morphologic and karyotypic study of 59 atypical lipomatous tumors. Evaluation of their relationship and differential diagnosis with other adipose tissue tumors (a report of the CHAMP Study Group)”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 20 (10): 1182–1189. PMID 8827023. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Dal Cin, Paola; Kools, Patrick; Sciot, Raf; De Wever, Ivo; Van Damme, Boudewijn; Van de Ven, Wim; Van Den Berghe, Herman (1993). “Cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization investigation of ring chromosomes characterizing a specific pathologic subgroup of adipose tissue tumors”. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 68 (2): 85–90. doi:10.1016/0165-4608(93)90001-3. ISSN 0165-4608.
- ↑ Dei Tos, Angelo P.; Doglioni, Claudio; Piccinin, Sara; Sciot, Raf; Furlanetto, Alberto; Boiocchi, Mauro; Dal Cin, Paola; Maestro, Roberta; Fletcher, Christopher D. M.; Tallini, Giovanni (2000). “Coordinated expression and amplification of theMDM2,CDK4, andHMGI-C genes in atypical lipomatous tumours”. The Journal of Pathology. 190 (5): 531–536. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200004)190:5<531::AID-PATH579>3.0.CO;2-W. ISSN 0022-3417.
- ↑ Dei Tos, A (2000). “Liposarcoma: New entities and evolving concepts”. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. 4 (4): 252–266. doi:10.1053/adpa.2000.8133. ISSN 1092-9134.
- ↑ M. D. Kraus, L. Guillou & C. D. Fletcher (1997). “Well-differentiated inflammatory liposarcoma: an uncommon and easily overlooked variant of a common sarcoma”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 21 (5): 518–527. PMID 9158675. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ P. Argani, F. Facchetti, G. Inghirami & J. Rosai (1997). “Lymphocyte-rich well-differentiated liposarcoma: report of nine cases”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 21 (8): 884–895. PMID 9255251. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ H. L. Evans (1979). “Liposarcoma: a study of 55 cases with a reassessment of its classification”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 3 (6): 507–523. PMID 534388. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ A. P. Dei Tos, T. Mentzel, P. L. Newman & C. D. Fletcher (1994). “Spindle cell liposarcoma, a hitherto unrecognized variant of liposarcoma. Analysis of six cases”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 18 (9): 913–921. PMID 8067512. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ D. C. Dahlin, K. K. Unni & T. Matsuno (1977). “Malignant (fibrous) histiocytoma of bone–fact or fancy?”. Cancer. 39 (4): 1508–1516. PMID 192432. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ 54.0 54.1 Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP (1995). “Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases”. Am J Surg Pathol. 19 (8): 859–72. PMID 7611533.
- ↑ 55.0 55.1 55.2 55.3 Wenig BM, Devaney K, Bisceglia M (1995). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study of eight cases simulating a malignant spindle cell neoplasm”. Cancer. 76 (11): 2217–29. PMID 8635024.
- ↑ 56.0 56.1 Ramachandra S, Hollowood K, Bisceglia M, Fletcher CD (1995). “Inflammatory pseudotumour of soft tissues: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 18 cases”. Histopathology. 27 (4): 313–23. PMID 8847061.
- ↑ 57.0 57.1 Häusler M, Schaade L, Ramaekers VT, Doenges M, Heimann G, Sellhaus B (2003). “Inflammatory pseudotumors of the central nervous system: report of 3 cases and a literature review”. Hum Pathol. 34 (3): 253–62. doi:10.1053/hupa.2003.35. PMID 12673560.
- ↑ 58.0 58.1 58.2 58.3 Rabban JT, Zaloudek CJ, Shekitka KM, Tavassoli FA (2005). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the uterus: a clinicopathologic study of 6 cases emphasizing distinction from aggressive mesenchymal tumors”. Am J Surg Pathol. 29 (10): 1348–55. PMID 16160478.
- ↑ 59.0 59.1 Kovach SJ, Fischer AC, Katzman PJ, Salloum RM, Ettinghausen SE, Madeb R; et al. (2006). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors”. J Surg Oncol. 94 (5): 385–91. doi:10.1002/jso.20516. PMID 16967468.
- ↑ 60.0 60.1 Coffin CM, Dehner LP, Meis-Kindblom JM (1998). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, inflammatory fibrosarcoma, and related lesions: an historical review with differential diagnostic considerations”. Semin Diagn Pathol. 15 (2): 102–10. PMID 9606802.
- ↑ 61.0 61.1 Berardi RS, Lee SS, Chen HP, Stines GJ (1983). “Inflammatory pseudotumors of the lung”. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 156 (1): 89–96. PMID 6336632.
- ↑ 62.0 62.1 Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Fletcher CD (2007). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: comparison of clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features including ALK expression in atypical and aggressive cases”. Am J Surg Pathol. 31 (4): 509–20. doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000213393.57322.c7. PMID 17414097.
- ↑ Cukic O, Jovanovic MB (2019). “Large Fibroepithelial Polyp of the Palatine Tonsil”. Ear Nose Throat J: 145561319841203. doi:10.1177/0145561319841203. PMID 30997841.
- ↑ Vatansever M, Dinç E, Dursun Ö, Oktay ÖÖ, Arpaci R (2019). “Atypical presentation of fibroepithelial polyp: a report of two cases”. Arq Bras Oftalmol. doi:10.5935/0004-2749.20190050. PMID 30916216.
- ↑ Rexhepi M, Trajkovska E, Besimi F, Rufati N (2018). “Giant Fibroepithelial Polyp of Vulva: A Case Report and Review of Literature”. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 39 (2–3): 127–130. doi:10.2478/prilozi-2018-0051. PMID 30864355.
- ↑ Jabbour J, Chappell JR, Busby M, McCubbery NW, Brown DF, Park SJK; et al. (2019). “Glottic Obstruction from Fibroepithelial Polyp”. Am J Case Rep. 20: 219–223. doi:10.12659/AJCR.914907. PMC 6388646. PMID 30778021.
- ↑ Hong P, Cai Y, Li Z, Fan S, Yang K, Hao H; et al. (2019). “Modified Laparoscopic Partial Ureterectomy for Adult Ureteral Fibroepithelial Polyp: Technique and Initial Experience”. Urol Int. 102 (1): 13–19. doi:10.1159/000494804. PMID 30448831.
- ↑ Uçar M, Baş E, Akkoç A, Topçuoğlu M (2018). “Fibroepithelial Polyp of the Ureter: A Rare Cause of Hydronephrosis”. J Endourol Case Rep. 4 (1): 166–168. doi:10.1089/cren.2018.0031. PMC 6225073. PMID 30426076.
- ↑ Chaker K, Rhouma SB, Daly KM, Zehani A, Bibi M, Chehida MAB; et al. (2019). “Benign fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter: A case report”. Urol Case Rep. 22: 52–53. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2018.10.019. PMC 6226574. PMID 30425926.
- ↑ Hajji F, Moufid K, Ghoundale O, Touiti D (2019). “A rare case of successful endoscopic management of a fibroepithelial polyp with intussusception of the ureter and periodic prolapse into bladder”. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 101 (2): e66–e70. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2018.0198. PMC 6351868. PMID 30421620.
- ↑ Lee H, Sade I, Gilani S, Zhong M, Lombardo G (2018). “A Giant Fibroepithelial Polyp of the Small Bowel Associated with High-Grade Obstruction”. Am Surg. 84 (7): e210–e211. PMID 30401014.
- ↑ Chaker K (2019). “Benign fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter: A case report”. Urol Case Rep. 22: 15–16. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2018.09.021. PMC 6180234. PMID 30319938.
- ↑ Lozano-Peña AK, Lamadrid-Zertuche AC, Ocampo-Candiani J (2019). “Giant fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva”. Australas J Dermatol. 60 (1): 70–71. doi:10.1111/ajd.12886. PMID 30009441.
- ↑ Eckstein M, Agaimy A, Woenckhaus J, Winter A, Bittmann I, Janzen J; et al. (2019). “DICER1 mutation-positive giant botryoid fibroepithelial polyp of the urinary bladder mimicking embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma”. Hum Pathol. 84: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2018.05.015. PMID 29883781.
- ↑ Akdere H, Çevik G (2018). “Rare Fibroepithelial Polyp Extending Along the Ureter: A Case Report”. Balkan Med J. 35 (3): 275–277. doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.1537. PMC 5981127. PMID 29843497.
- ↑ Ballard DH, Rove KO, Coplen DE, Chen TY, Hulett Bowling RL (2018). “Fibroepithelial polyp causing urethral obstruction: Diagnosis by cystourethrogram”. Clin Imaging. 51: 164–167. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.009. PMC 6404776. PMID 29800931.
- ↑ Amin A, Amin Z, Al Farsi AR (2018). “Septic presentation of a giant fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva”. BMJ Case Rep. 2018. doi:10.1136/bcr-2017-222789. PMID 29574427.
- ↑ Gupta R, Smita S, Sinha R, Sinha N, Sinha L (2018). “Giant fibroepithelial polyp of the thigh and retroperitoneal fibromatosis in a young woman: a rare case”. Skeletal Radiol. 47 (9): 1299–1304. doi:10.1007/s00256-018-2904-x. PMID 29487969.
- ↑ Rajeesh Mohammed PK, Choudhury BK, Dalai RP, Rana V (2017). “Fibroepithelial Polyp with Sebaceous Hyperplasia: A Case Report”. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 38 (3): 404–406. doi:10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_124_17. PMC 5686997. PMID 29200704.
- ↑ Lee MH, Hwang JY, Lee JH, Kim DH, Song SH (2017). “Fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva accompanied by lymphangioma circumscriptum”. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 60 (4): 401–404. doi:10.5468/ogs.2017.60.4.401. PMC 5547092. PMID 28791276.
- ↑ Ten Donkelaar CS, Houwert AC, Ten Kate FJW, Lock MTWT (2017). “Polypoid arteriovenous malformation of the ureter mimicking a fibroepithelial polyp, a case report”. BMC Urol. 17 (1): 55. doi:10.1186/s12894-017-0237-z. PMC 5504856. PMID 28693464.
- ↑ Saito N, Yamasaki M, Daido W, Ishiyama S, Deguchi N, Taniwaki M (2017). “A bronchial fibroepithelial polyp with abnormal findings on auto-fluorescence imaging”. Respirol Case Rep. 5 (5): e00244. doi:10.1002/rcr2.244. PMC 5465754. PMID 28603622.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2], Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]
Overview
Neurofibroma usually occurs between 20-40 years of age, and affects men and women equally. However, plexiform neurofibromas are thought to be congenital defects, hence, they occur earlier in life.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Age
- Neurofibroma usually affects individuals between 20 and 40 years of age.
- Plexiform neurofibromas occur earlier in life and are thought to be congenital defects.[1]
Gender
- Neurofibroma affects men and women equally.
References
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2] Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]
Overview
Neurofibromatosis 1 and Neurofibromatosis 2 are the most common risk factors for development of neurofibromas.
Risk Factors
Following are the most common risk factors for formation of neurofibromas:[1]
- Neurofibromatosis 1
- Neurofibromatosis 2 (multiple neurofibromas, meningiomas of the brain or spinal cord, and ependymomas of the spinal cord)
References
- ↑ Colman SD, Williams CA, Wallace MR (1995). “Benign neurofibromas in type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1) show somatic deletions of the NF1 gene”. Nature Genetics. 11 (1): 90–2. doi:10.1038/ng0995-90. PMID 7550323. Retrieved 2015-11-16.
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2] Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]
Overview
According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for neurofibroma.
Screening
According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for neurofibroma.
References
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2] Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]
Overview
Prognosis of neurofibroma is generally excellent. If left untreated, 10% of patients with plexiform neurofibromas may progress to develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Local recurrence occurs rarely.
Natural History
- If left untreated, 10% of patients with plexiform neurofibromas may progress to develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST)[1]
Complications
- Complications that can develop as a result of neurofibroma include the following:[1]
Prognosis
- Prognosis of neurofibroma is generally excellent
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Mautner VF, Friedrich RE, von Deimling A, Hagel C, Korf B, Knöfel MT, Wenzel R, Fünsterer C. (2003). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: MRI supports the diagnosis of malignant plexiform neurofibroma”. American Journal of Pathology. 45 (9): 618–25. doi:10.1007/s00234-003-0964-6. PMID 12898075.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic criteria | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies | Biopsy
Treatment
Treatment
Medical therapy | Surgery | Primary prevention | Secondary prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH
