Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Neurofibroma

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2], Kiran Singh, M.D. [3], Shanshan Cen, M.D. [4]

Synonyms and keywords: Endoneural fibroma, Myxofibroma of nerve sheath, Neurofibromyxoma, Perineural fibroblastoma, Perineural fibroma

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2], Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]

Overview

Neurofibromas are benign nerve sheath tumors of neural origin in peripheral nervous system, comprising all elements of the peripheral nerve (i.e. axons, Schwann cells and fibroblasts) and can occur anywhere in the body. Neurofibromas may occur as part of the syndrome of neurofibromatosis (most common), solitary neurofibromas, or multiple neurofibromas without von Recklinghausen’s disease (NF-1). Neurofibroma may be classified into further subtypes such as localized, cutaneous, subcutaneous, intraneural, intramuscular, diffuse, pigmented, and plexiform neurofibroma. However, plexiform neurofibroma can be further subclassified into diffuse, and nodular plexiform neurofibroma. Gene involved in the pathogenesis of plexiform neurofibroma is NF1 which codes for neurofibromin that leads to loss of RAS control causing increased activity of downstream RAS pathways involved in increased cell growth and survival. On gross pathology, a non-encapsulated superficial mass is the characteristic finding of localized or diffuse neurofibroma; whereas the “bag of worms” appearance is the characteristic finding of plexiform neurofibroma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, nerve fibers, schwann cells, spindle cells with wavy nuclei without pleomorphism, shredded carrot collagen, moderate increase of cellularity vis-a-vis normal dermis, blood vessels, mast cells, pseudomeissnerian bodies, and varying degrees of myxoid degeneration are characteristic findings of neurofibroma. However, plexiform neurofibroma shows a characteristic target sign on histopathology. It usually affects both men and women equally between the age of 20-40 years. Common symptoms of neurofibroma include soft masses, transient itching, and transient pain with rest of the symptoms depending upon the involved site. There is no single diagnostic study of choice for neurofibroma, instead, it is diagnosed on the basis of medical history, physical examination, and imaging studies such as CT or MRI. The predominant therapy for neurofibroma is surgical resection. Adjunctive chemotherapy and medications such as ACE inhibitors may be required. Prognosis of neurofibroma is generally excellent. If left untreated, 10% of patients with plexiform neurofibromas may progress to develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Local recurrence occurs rarely.

Historical Perspective

NF1-like cutaneous tumor syndromes appeared in the literature in 1880s, when Friedrich von Recklinghausen published seminal observations detailing cutaneous tumors comprised of both neuronal and fibroblastic tissue finally termed as neurofibromas. In 2006, Yang et al demonstrated a critical neurofibroma microenvironment interaction that includes SCFstimulated Nf1+/− mast cells potentiating Nf1+/− fibroblast functions.

Classification

Neurofibroma may be classified into 5 subtypes: cutaneous/dermal/localized, localized intraneural, subcutaneous, diffuse, intramuscular, plexiform and pigmented neurofibroma. Plexiform neurofibromas may be further sub-classified into diffuse and nodular plexiform.

Pathophysiology

Neurofibromas arise from the nonmyelinating-type Schwann cells. Gene involved in the pathogenesis of plexiform neurofibroma is NF1 which codes for neurofibromin that leads to loss of RAS control causing increased activity of downstream RAS pathways involved in increased cell growth and survival. Neurofibromas can occur anywhere in body. On gross pathology, a nonencapsulated superficial mass is the characteristic finding of localised or diffuseneurofibroma; whereas the “bag of worms” appearance is the characteristic finding of plexiform neurofibroma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, nerve fibers, schwann cells, spindle cells with wavy nuclei without pleomorphism, shredded carrot collagen, moderate increase of cellularity vis-a-vis normal dermis, blood vessels, mast cells, pseudomeissnerian bodies, and varying degrees of myxoid degeneration are characteristic findings of neurofibroma. However, plexiform neurofibroma shows a characteristic target sign on histopathology, representing a central core of collagenous and fibrillary tissue with peripheral less denselycellular myxoid tissue. Electron microscopy of neurofibromas shows Schwann cells enclosing axons in plasmalemmal invaginations (mesaxons).

Causes

Plexiform neurofibroma may be caused by the bi-allelic inactivation of the neurofibromatosis type I tumor suppressor gene.

Differential Diagnosis

Neurofibroma must be differentiated from schwannoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), ganglioneuroma, dermal neurotized melanocytic nevus, myxoid liposarcoma, solitary circumscribed neuroma, traumatic neuroma, superficial angiomyxoma, nerve sheath myxoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, spindle cell lipoma, leiomyoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and fibroepithelial polyp.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Neurofibroma usually occurs between 20-40 years of age, and affects men and women equally. However, plexiform neurofibromas are thought to be congenital defects, hence, they occur earlier in life.

Risk Factors

Neurofibromatosis 1 and Neurofibromatosis 2 are the most common risk factors for development of neurofibromas.

Screening

According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for neurofibroma.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Prognosis of neurofibroma is generally excellent. If left untreated, 10% of patients with plexiform neurofibromas may progress to develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Local recurrence occurs rarely.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

There is no single diagnostic study of choice for neurofibroma, instead, it is diagnosed on the basis of medical history, physical examination, and imaging studiessuch as CT or MRI.

Staging

There is no established system for the staging of neurofibroma.

History and symptoms

Neurofibromas can form anywhere in body with diffuse neurofibromas commonly involving scalp. Symptoms of neurofibroma include soft masses/bumps (internal or superficial) , transient itching, pain, numbness and tingling in the affected area, severe bleeding, physical disfiguration, cognitive disability, stinging, neurological deficits, changes in movement (clumsiness in the hands, trouble walking), bowel incontinence, scoliosis, UTI, urinary retention, urgency, frequency, urinary incontinence, hematuria, hydronephrosis, or pelvic mass.

Physical Examination

Physical examination of patients with neurofibroma is usually remarkable for soft masses (internal or superficial).

Laboratory Findings

On Immunohistochemistry, neurofibroma stains positive for S100, SOX10, CD34, factor XIIIa, neurofilament, GFAP and calretinin and negative for EMA, keratin, smooth muscle actin, desmin, calponin, caldesmon and p53.

X Ray

There are no X-ray findings associated with neurofibroma.

CT Scan

CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma. Findings on CT scan suggestive of neurofibroma include a well-defined, round or oval hypodense, fusiform mass representing the nerve entering and exiting the tumor. Low attenuation is attributed to high lipid or water content within the mucinous matrix, entrapment of perineural adipose tissue and cystic degeneration.

MRI

MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma. It appears as a hypointense, homogeneous low signal intensity lesion with center demonstrating a higher signal intensity than the periphery on T1. T2 weighted images show hyperintense, homogeneous lesion with positive target sign and fascicular sign. Moreover, neurofibromas have heterogeneous enhancement on T1 C+ (Gd) (with gadolinium contrast).

Ultrasound

There are no ultrasound findings associated with neurofibroma.

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with neurofibroma.

Other Diagnostic Studies

There are no other diagnostic study findings associated with neurofibroma.

Biopsy

Biopsy is helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The predominant therapy for neurofibroma is surgical resection. Adjunctive chemotherapy and medications such as ACE inhibitors may be required.

Surgery

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for neurofibroma. Localized and diffuse lesions are usually treated surgically. Neurofibromas that infiltrate between nervefascicles are unable to be separated from the parent nerve, therefore, deep-seated lesions are often managed conservatively. Local recurrence after excision is uncommon .and malignant transformation occurs rarely.

Primary Prevention

There is no established method for primary prevention of neurofibroma.

Secondary Prevention

There are no secondary preventive measures available for neurofibroma.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]

Overview

NF1-like cutaneous tumor syndromes appeared in the literature in 1880s, when Friedrich von Recklinghausen published seminal observations detailing cutaneous tumors comprised of both neuronal and fibroblastic tissue finally termed as neurofibromas. In 2006, Yang et al demonstrated a critical neurofibroma microenvironment interaction that includes SCFstimulated Nf1+/− mast cells potentiating Nf1+/− fibroblast functions.

Historical Perspective

References

  1. Morse RP (1999). “Neurofibromatosis type 1”. Arch Neurol. 56 (3): 364–5. PMID 10190829.
  2. Staser, Karl; Yang, Feng-Chun; Clapp, D. Wade (2010). “Mast cells and the neurofibroma microenvironment”. Blood. 116 (2): 157–164. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-242875. ISSN 0006-4971.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]

Overview

Neurofibroma may be classified into 5 subtypes: cutaneous/dermal/localized, localized intraneural, subcutaneous, diffuse, intramuscular, plexiform and pigmented neurofibroma. Plexiform neurofibromas may be further sub-classified into diffuse and nodular plexiform.

Classification

Neurofibroma may be classified into following subtypes:[1][2]

Types of neurofibromas Characteristics/Description
Cutaneous/Dermal/Localized/Sporadic neurofibroma (90%)
Localized Intraneural neurofibroma
Subcutaneous neurofibroma
Diffuse neurofibroma

(superficial)

Intramuscular neurofibroma
Plexiform neurofibroma

(deep)

Pigmented neurofibroma

Plexiform neurofibromas can be further subclassified into following:

Types of neurofibromas Characteristics/Description
Diffuse Plexiform neurofibroma
Nodular Plexiform neurofibroma

References

  1. Wilkinson, Lana M.; Manson, David; Smith, Charles R. (2004). “Best Cases from the AFIP”. RadioGraphics. 24 (suppl_1): S237–S242. doi:10.1148/rg.24si035170. ISSN 0271-5333.
  2. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.24si035170#REF8


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]

Overview

Neurofibromas arise from the nonmyelinating-type Schwann cells and can occur anywhere in the body. Gene involved in the pathogenesis of plexiform neurofibroma is NF1 which codes for neurofibromin that leads to loss of RAS control causing increased activity of downstream RAS pathways involved in increased cell growth and survival. Plexiform neurofibroma may be caused by the bi-allelic inactivation of the neurofibromatosis type I tumor suppressor gene. On gross pathology, a nonencapsulated superficial mass is the characteristic finding of localised or diffuse neurofibroma; whereas the “bag of worms” appearance is the characteristic finding of plexiform neurofibroma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, nerve fibers, schwann cells, spindle cells with wavy nuclei without pleomorphism, shredded carrot collagen, moderate increase of cellularity vis-a-vis normal dermis, blood vessels, mast cells, pseudomeissnerian bodies, and varying degrees of myxoid degeneration are characteristic findings of neurofibroma. However, plexiform neurofibroma shows a characteristic target sign on histopathology, representing a central core of collagenous and fibrillary tissue with peripheral less densely cellular myxoid tissue. Electron microscopy of neurofibromas shows Schwann cells enclosing axons in plasmalemmal invaginations (mesaxons).

Pathogenesis

Genetics

Gross Pathology

Localised neurofibroma and Diffuse neurofibroma

Soft tissue neurofibroma

Plexiform neurofibroma

Microscopic Pathology

Neurofibroma with Degenerative Atypia (“Ancient change”)

Soft tissue neurofibromas

Plexiform neurofibromas

Electron microscopy

References

  1. Muir D, Neubauer D, Lim IT, Yachnis AT, Wallace MR. (2003). “Tumorigenic properties of neurofibromin-deficient neurofibroma Schwann cells”. American Journal of Pathology. 158 (2): 501–13. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63992-2. PMC 1850316. PMID 11159187.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Bernthal, NM.; Jones, KB.; Monument, MJ.; Liu, T.; Viskochil, D.; Randall, RL. (2013). “Lost in translation: ambiguity in nerve sheath tumor nomenclature and its resultant treatment effect”. Cancers (Basel). 5 (2): 519–28. doi:10.3390/cancers5020519. PMID 24216989.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Staser, K.; Yang, FC.; Clapp, DW. (2010). “Mast cells and the neurofibroma microenvironment”. Blood. 116 (2): 157–64. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-242875. PMID 20233971. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. Mautner VF, Friedrich RE, von Deimling A, Hagel C, Korf B, Knöfel MT, Wenzel R, Fünsterer C. (2003). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: MRI supports the diagnosis of malignant plexiform neurofibroma”. American Journal of Pathology. 45 (9): 618–25. doi:10.1007/s00234-003-0964-6. PMID 12898075.
  5. http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/116/2/157?sso-checked=true
  6. MH Shen, PS Harper, M Upadhyaya. (1996). “Molecular genetics of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)”. Journal of Medical Genetics. 33 (1): 2–17. doi:10.1136/jmg.33.1.2. PMC 1051805. PMID 8825042.
  7. Rubin JB, Gutmann DH. (2005). “Neurofibromatosis type 1 – a model for nervous system tumour formation?”. Nature Reviews Cancer. 5 (7): 557–64. doi:10.1038/nrc1653. PMID 16069817.
  8. Johnson MR, Look AT, DeClue JE, Valentine MB, Lowy DR. (1993). “Inactivation of the NF1 gene in human melanoma and neuroblastoma cell lines without impaired regulation of GTP.Ras”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 90 (12): 5539–43. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.12.5539. PMC 46756. PMID 8516298.
  9. Wilkinson LM, Manson D, Smith CR (2004). “Best cases from the AFIP: plexiform neurofibroma of the bladder”. Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 24 Suppl 1: S237–42. doi:10.1148/rg.24si035170. PMID 15486243. Retrieved 2015-11-13.
  10. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.24si035170#REF8


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Causes
Differentiating Neurofibroma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2]

Overview

Neurofibroma must be differentiated from schwannoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), ganglioneuroma, dermal neurotized melanocytic nevus, myxoid liposarcoma, solitary circumscribed neuroma, traumatic neuroma, superficial angiomyxoma, nerve sheath myxoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, spindle cell lipoma, leiomyoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and fibroepithelial polyp.

Differential Diagnosis

Neurofibroma must be differentiated from:

Differentiating neurofibroma from other diseases
Disease entity Etiology (Genetic or others) Histopathological findings Immunohistochemical staining Risk factors Common site of involvement Clinical manifestations Other associated features
Neurofibroma[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][4][8][9][10][11]

Can be sporadic or as a part of Neurofibromatosis 1 and 2

Neurofibroma with degenerative atypia (“ancient change“) has following microscopic features:

Positive for:

Negative for:

Schwannoma[12][13][14][15][16] Positive for:

Negative for:

Symptoms of schwannoma depend on the location of the tumor:

Palisaded encapsulated neuroma (PEN) /solitary circumscribed neuroma[17] Positive for:

Negative for:

90% lesions affect the face involving:

Remaining 10% can occur anywhere in body involving:

Traumatic neuroma[18][19][20][21] Positive for: Most common oral locations are:

Rarely involves:

Also known as:
Neurotized melanocytic nevus[22][23][24][25] Positive for:

Negative for:

Can occur anywhere in body, mostly involving following areas: _
Cutaneous myxoma (Superficial angiomyxoma)[26][27][28][29] Positive for:

Negative for:

Associated with Carney’s complex/syndrome which includes following:

May be associated with NAME or LAMB syndrome

Nerve sheath myxoma[30][31][32][33][34][35] Positive for: _ Can occur anywhere in body:
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST)/malignant schwannoma[36][37][38][39][40][41]

Electron microscopy shows:

Positive for:

In case of glandular differentiation (malignant), positive for:

Negative for:

Associated with:

May be associated with:

Bulky deep-seated tumor usually arising from major nerves in:
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) Positive for:

Negative for:

_
Spindle cell lipoma Positive for:

Spindle cells are negative for:

_
  • Multiple well-circumscribed painless nodules involving several body parts
_
Ganglioneuroma[42][43] Genes involved in the pathogenesis of ganglioneuroma include:

Two histologic subtypes:

Positive for:

Negative for:

Ganglioneuromas may be associated with:

Located along distribution of sympathetic nervous system:

Symptoms of ganglioneuroma vary depending on the location of tumor, and include the following:

Patients with ganglioneuroma may also have paraneoplastic syndrome, which may manifest with:

Ganglioneuromas are included in the neuroblastic tumors group, which includes:

Myxoid liposarcoma[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]

Atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma are associated with:

Myxoid liposarcoma is associated with:

Pleomorphicliposarcoma is associated with:

Well-differentiated liposarcoma:

De-differentiated liposarcoma:

Atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma is positive for:

_
Leiomyoma[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][55][58][62]

Positive for:

Negative for:

_
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor(IMT)[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][55][58][62]

Unknown underlying etiology, may be due to inflammatory reaction to:

Mutations such as:

Positive for:

Negative for:

Also known as:

Fibroepithelial polyp/Acrochordon[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] Associated with: Positive for:

Negative for:

Associated with:

Also known as:

References

  1. Rodriguez, Fausto J.; Folpe, Andrew L.; Giannini, Caterina; Perry, Arie (2012). “Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems”. Acta Neuropathologica. 123 (3): 295–319. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-0954-z. ISSN 0001-6322.
  2. Choi, Kwangmin; Komurov, Kakajan; Fletcher, Jonathan S.; Jousma, Edwin; Cancelas, Jose A.; Wu, Jianqiang; Ratner, Nancy (2017). “An inflammatory gene signature distinguishes neurofibroma Schwann cells and macrophages from cells in the normal peripheral nervous system”. Scientific Reports. 7 (1). doi:10.1038/srep43315. ISSN 2045-2322.
  3. Liao, Chung-Ping; Booker, Reid C.; Brosseau, Jean-Philippe; Chen, Zhiguo; Mo, Juan; Tchegnon, Edem; Wang, Yong; Clapp, D. Wade; Le, Lu Q. (2018). “Contributions of inflammation and tumor microenvironment to neurofibroma tumorigenesis”. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 128 (7): 2848–2861. doi:10.1172/JCI99424. ISSN 0021-9738.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Staser, K.; Yang, F.-C.; Clapp, D. W. (2010). “Mast cells and the neurofibroma microenvironment”. Blood. 116 (2): 157–164. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-242875. ISSN 0006-4971.
  5. Muir, David; Neubauer, Debbie; Lim, Ingrid T.; Yachnis, Anthony T.; Wallace, Margaret R. (2001). “Tumorigenic Properties of Neurofibromin-Deficient Neurofibroma Schwann Cells”. The American Journal of Pathology. 158 (2): 501–513. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63992-2. ISSN 0002-9440.
  6. Wilkinson, Lana M.; Manson, David; Smith, Charles R. (2004). “Best Cases from the AFIP”. RadioGraphics. 24 (suppl_1): S237–S242. doi:10.1148/rg.24si035170. ISSN 0271-5333.
  7. Bernthal, Nicholas; Jones, Kevin; Monument, Michael; Liu, Ting; Viskochil, David; Randall, R. (2013). “Lost in Translation: Ambiguity in Nerve Sheath Tumor Nomenclature and Its Resultant Treatment Effect”. Cancers. 5 (4): 519–528. doi:10.3390/cancers5020519. ISSN 2072-6694.
  8. Mautner, V. F.; Friedrich, R. E.; von Deimling, A.; Hagel, C.; Korf, B.; Knöfel, M. T.; Wenzel, R.; Fünsterer, C. (2003). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: MRI supports the diagnosis of malignant plexiform neurofibroma”. Neuroradiology. 45 (9): 618–625. doi:10.1007/s00234-003-0964-6. ISSN 0028-3940.
  9. Shen, M H; Harper, P S; Upadhyaya, M (1996). “Molecular genetics of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)”. Journal of Medical Genetics. 33 (1): 2–17. doi:10.1136/jmg.33.1.2. ISSN 1468-6244.
  10. Rubin, Joshua B.; Gutmann, David H. (2005). “Neurofibromatosis type 1 — a model for nervous system tumour formation?”. Nature Reviews Cancer. 5 (7): 557–564. doi:10.1038/nrc1653. ISSN 1474-175X.
  11. Gray, Mark H. (1990). “Immunohistochemical Demonstration of Factor XIIIa Expression in Neurofibromas”. Archives of Dermatology. 126 (4): 472. doi:10.1001/archderm.1990.01670280056009. ISSN 0003-987X.
  12. Schwannoma. Dr Tim Luijkx and Dr Sara Wein et al. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/schwannoma
  13. Vestibular Schwannoma. Wikipedia(2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestibular_schwannoma Accessed on October 2 2015
  14. Giordano J, Rogers LV (1989). “Peripherally administered serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists reduce inflammatory pain in rats”. European Journal of Pharmacology. 170 (1–2): 83–6. PMID 2612565. |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  15. Kolvenbach H, Lauven PM, Schneider B, Kunath U (1989). “Repetitive intercostal nerve block via catheter for postoperative pain relief after thoracotomy”. The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon. 37 (5): 273–6. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1020331. PMID 2588243. Retrieved 2015-11-20.
  16. Opaleva-Stegantseva VA, Ivanov AG, Gavrilina IA, Khar’kov EI, Ratovskaia VI (1986). “[Incidence of sudden death cases in acute coronary insufficiency and acute myocardial infarction at the pre-hospital stage in Krasnoyarsk]”. Kardiologiia (in Russian). 26 (5): 23–6. PMID 3735913. |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  17. Misago N, Inoue T, Narisawa Y (2007). “Unusual benign myxoid nerve sheath lesion: myxoid palisaded encapsulated neuroma (PEN) or nerve sheath myxoma with PEN/PEN-like features?”. Am J Dermatopathol. 29 (2): 160–4. doi:10.1097/01.dad.0000256688.91974.09. PMID 17414438.
  18. Lee EJ, Calcaterra TC, Zuckerbraun L (1998). “Traumatic neuromas of the head and neck”. Ear Nose Throat J. 77 (8): 670–4, 676. PMID 9745184.
  19. Hanna SA, Catapano J, Borschel GH (2016). “Painful pediatric traumatic neuroma: surgical management and clinical outcomes”. Childs Nerv Syst. 32 (7): 1191–4. doi:10.1007/s00381-016-3109-z. PMID 27179535.
  20. Foltán R, Klíma K, Spacková J, Sedý J (2008). “Mechanism of traumatic neuroma development”. Med Hypotheses. 71 (4): 572–6. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.05.010. PMID 18599222.
  21. Yao C, Zhou X, Zhao B, Sun C, Poonit K, Yan H (2017). “Treatments of traumatic neuropathic pain: a systematic review”. Oncotarget. 8 (34): 57670–57679. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16917. PMC 5593675. PMID 28915703.
  22. Gray MH, Smoller BR, McNutt NS, Hsu A (1990). “Neurofibromas and neurotized melanocytic nevi are immunohistochemically distinct neoplasms”. Am J Dermatopathol. 12 (3): 234–41. PMID 1693815.
  23. Chen Y, Klonowski PW, Lind AC, Lu D (2012). “Differentiating neurotized melanocytic nevi from neurofibromas using Melan-A (MART-1) immunohistochemical stain”. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 136 (7): 810–5. doi:10.5858/arpa.2011-0335-OA. PMID 22742554.
  24. Singh N, Chandrashekar L, Kar R, Sylvia MT, Thappa DM (2015). “Neurotized congenital melanocytic nevus resembling a pigmented neurofibroma”. Indian J Dermatol. 60 (1): 46–50. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.147789. PMC 4318062. PMID 25657396.
  25. Gray MH, Smoller BR, McNutt NS, Hsu A (1990). “Immunohistochemical demonstration of factor XIIIa expression in neurofibromas. A practical means of differentiating these tumors from neurotized melanocytic nevi and schwannomas”. Arch Dermatol. 126 (4): 472–6. PMID 1690969.
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/cutaneous-myxoma
  27. Alaiti, Samer; Nelson, Fern P.; Ryoo, Jei W. (2000). “Solitary cutaneous myxoma”. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 43 (2): 377–379. doi:10.1067/mjd.2000.101878. ISSN 0190-9622.
  28. Carney, J. Aidan (1986). “Cutaneous Myxomas”. Archives of Dermatology. 122 (7): 790. doi:10.1001/archderm.1986.01660190068018. ISSN 0003-987X.
  29. Iida, Ken; Egi, Takeshi; Shigi, Masato; Sogabe, Yusuke; Ohashi, Hirotsugu (2019). “Cutaneous Myxoma of Multiple Lesions”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open. 7 (2): e2040. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002040. ISSN 2169-7574.
  30. Fetsch JF, Laskin WB, Miettinen M (2005). “Nerve sheath myxoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 57 morphologically distinctive, S-100 protein- and GFAP-positive, myxoid peripheral nerve sheath tumors with a predilection for the extremities and a high local recurrence rate”. Am J Surg Pathol. 29 (12): 1615–24. PMID 16327434.
  31. Yadav SK, Singh S, Sarin N, Naeem R, Pruthi SK (2019). “Nerve Sheath Myxoma of Scalp: A Rare Site of Presentation”. Int J Trichology. 11 (1): 34–37. doi:10.4103/ijt.ijt_45_18. PMC 6385516. PMID 30820132.
  32. Bhat A, Narasimha A, C V, Vk S (2015). “Nerve sheath myxoma: report of a rare case”. J Clin Diagn Res. 9 (4): ED07–9. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/10911.5810. PMC 4437072. PMID 26023558.
  33. Avninder S, Ramesh V, Vermani S (2007). “Benign nerve sheath myxoma (myxoid neurothekeoma) in the leg”. Dermatol Online J. 13 (2): 14. PMID 17498433.
  34. Kim BW, Won CH, Chang SE, Lee MW (2014). “A case of nerve sheath myxoma on finger”. Indian J Dermatol. 59 (1): 99–101. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.123526. PMC 3884944. PMID 24470676.
  35. Pulitzer DR, Reed RJ (1985). “Nerve-sheath myxoma (perineurial myxoma)”. Am J Dermatopathol. 7 (5): 409–21. PMID 4091218.
  36. Valeyrie-Allanore, L.; Ismaili, N.; Bastuji-Garin, S.; Zeller, J.; Wechsler, J.; Revuz, J.; Wolkenstein, P. (2005). “Symptoms associated with malignancy of peripheral nerve sheath tumours: a retrospective study of 69 patients with neurofibromatosis 1”. British Journal of Dermatology. 153 (1): 79–82. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06558.x. ISSN 0007-0963.
  37. Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, Sharif S, Howard E, Moran A (2002). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1”. J Med Genet. 39 (5): 311–4. PMC 1735122. PMID 12011145.
  38. Panigrahi S, Mishra SS, Das S, Dhir MK (2013). “Primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor at unusual location”. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 4 (Suppl 1): S83–6. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.116480. PMC 3808069. PMID 24174807.
  39. Ferrari A, Bisogno G, Carli M (2007). “Management of childhood malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor”. Paediatr Drugs. 9 (4): 239–48. doi:10.2165/00148581-200709040-00005. PMID 17705563.
  40. Neville H, Corpron C, Blakely ML, Andrassy R (2003). “Pediatric neurofibrosarcoma”. J Pediatr Surg. 38 (3): 343–6, discussion 343-6. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2003.50105. PMID 12632346.
  41. Zehou, Ouidad; Fabre, Elizabeth; Zelek, Laurent; Sbidian, Emilie; Ortonne, Nicolas; Banu, Eugeniu; Wolkenstein, Pierre; Valeyrie-Allanore, Laurence (2013). “Chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis 1: a 10-year institutional review”. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 8 (1): 127. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-8-127. ISSN 1750-1172.
  42. Vasiliadis, K.; Papavasiliou, C.; Fachiridis, D.; Pervana, S.; Michaelides, M.; Kiranou, M.; Makridis, C. (2012). “Retroperitoneal extra-adrenal ganglioneuroma involving the infrahepatic inferior vena cava, celiac axis and superior mesenteric artery: A case report”. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 3 (11): 541–543. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2012.07.008. ISSN 2210-2612.
  43. https://radiopaedia.org/articles/ganglioneuroma
  44. Khin Thway, Rashpal Flora, Chirag Shah, David Olmos & Cyril Fisher (2012). “Diagnostic utility of p16, CDK4, and MDM2 as an immunohistochemical panel in distinguishing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas from other adipocytic tumors”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 36 (3): 462–469. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182417330. PMID 22301498. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  45. J. Rosai, M. Akerman, P. Dal Cin, I. DeWever, C. D. Fletcher, N. Mandahl, F. Mertens, F. Mitelman, A. Rydholm, R. Sciot, G. Tallini, H. Van den Berghe, W. Van de Ven, R. Vanni & H. Willen (1996). “Combined morphologic and karyotypic study of 59 atypical lipomatous tumors. Evaluation of their relationship and differential diagnosis with other adipose tissue tumors (a report of the CHAMP Study Group)”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 20 (10): 1182–1189. PMID 8827023. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  46. Dal Cin, Paola; Kools, Patrick; Sciot, Raf; De Wever, Ivo; Van Damme, Boudewijn; Van de Ven, Wim; Van Den Berghe, Herman (1993). “Cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization investigation of ring chromosomes characterizing a specific pathologic subgroup of adipose tissue tumors”. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 68 (2): 85–90. doi:10.1016/0165-4608(93)90001-3. ISSN 0165-4608.
  47. Dei Tos, Angelo P.; Doglioni, Claudio; Piccinin, Sara; Sciot, Raf; Furlanetto, Alberto; Boiocchi, Mauro; Dal Cin, Paola; Maestro, Roberta; Fletcher, Christopher D. M.; Tallini, Giovanni (2000). “Coordinated expression and amplification of theMDM2,CDK4, andHMGI-C genes in atypical lipomatous tumours”. The Journal of Pathology. 190 (5): 531–536. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200004)190:5<531::AID-PATH579>3.0.CO;2-W. ISSN 0022-3417.
  48. Dei Tos, A (2000). “Liposarcoma: New entities and evolving concepts”. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. 4 (4): 252–266. doi:10.1053/adpa.2000.8133. ISSN 1092-9134.
  49. M. D. Kraus, L. Guillou & C. D. Fletcher (1997). “Well-differentiated inflammatory liposarcoma: an uncommon and easily overlooked variant of a common sarcoma”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 21 (5): 518–527. PMID 9158675. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  50. P. Argani, F. Facchetti, G. Inghirami & J. Rosai (1997). “Lymphocyte-rich well-differentiated liposarcoma: report of nine cases”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 21 (8): 884–895. PMID 9255251. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  51. H. L. Evans (1979). “Liposarcoma: a study of 55 cases with a reassessment of its classification”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 3 (6): 507–523. PMID 534388. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  52. A. P. Dei Tos, T. Mentzel, P. L. Newman & C. D. Fletcher (1994). “Spindle cell liposarcoma, a hitherto unrecognized variant of liposarcoma. Analysis of six cases”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 18 (9): 913–921. PMID 8067512. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  53. D. C. Dahlin, K. K. Unni & T. Matsuno (1977). “Malignant (fibrous) histiocytoma of bone–fact or fancy?”. Cancer. 39 (4): 1508–1516. PMID 192432. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  54. 54.0 54.1 Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP (1995). “Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases”. Am J Surg Pathol. 19 (8): 859–72. PMID 7611533.
  55. 55.0 55.1 55.2 55.3 Wenig BM, Devaney K, Bisceglia M (1995). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study of eight cases simulating a malignant spindle cell neoplasm”. Cancer. 76 (11): 2217–29. PMID 8635024.
  56. 56.0 56.1 Ramachandra S, Hollowood K, Bisceglia M, Fletcher CD (1995). “Inflammatory pseudotumour of soft tissues: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 18 cases”. Histopathology. 27 (4): 313–23. PMID 8847061.
  57. 57.0 57.1 Häusler M, Schaade L, Ramaekers VT, Doenges M, Heimann G, Sellhaus B (2003). “Inflammatory pseudotumors of the central nervous system: report of 3 cases and a literature review”. Hum Pathol. 34 (3): 253–62. doi:10.1053/hupa.2003.35. PMID 12673560.
  58. 58.0 58.1 58.2 58.3 Rabban JT, Zaloudek CJ, Shekitka KM, Tavassoli FA (2005). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the uterus: a clinicopathologic study of 6 cases emphasizing distinction from aggressive mesenchymal tumors”. Am J Surg Pathol. 29 (10): 1348–55. PMID 16160478.
  59. 59.0 59.1 Kovach SJ, Fischer AC, Katzman PJ, Salloum RM, Ettinghausen SE, Madeb R; et al. (2006). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors”. J Surg Oncol. 94 (5): 385–91. doi:10.1002/jso.20516. PMID 16967468.
  60. 60.0 60.1 Coffin CM, Dehner LP, Meis-Kindblom JM (1998). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, inflammatory fibrosarcoma, and related lesions: an historical review with differential diagnostic considerations”. Semin Diagn Pathol. 15 (2): 102–10. PMID 9606802.
  61. 61.0 61.1 Berardi RS, Lee SS, Chen HP, Stines GJ (1983). “Inflammatory pseudotumors of the lung”. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 156 (1): 89–96. PMID 6336632.
  62. 62.0 62.1 Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Fletcher CD (2007). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: comparison of clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features including ALK expression in atypical and aggressive cases”. Am J Surg Pathol. 31 (4): 509–20. doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000213393.57322.c7. PMID 17414097.
  63. Cukic O, Jovanovic MB (2019). “Large Fibroepithelial Polyp of the Palatine Tonsil”. Ear Nose Throat J: 145561319841203. doi:10.1177/0145561319841203. PMID 30997841.
  64. Vatansever M, Dinç E, Dursun Ö, Oktay ÖÖ, Arpaci R (2019). “Atypical presentation of fibroepithelial polyp: a report of two cases”. Arq Bras Oftalmol. doi:10.5935/0004-2749.20190050. PMID 30916216.
  65. Rexhepi M, Trajkovska E, Besimi F, Rufati N (2018). “Giant Fibroepithelial Polyp of Vulva: A Case Report and Review of Literature”. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 39 (2–3): 127–130. doi:10.2478/prilozi-2018-0051. PMID 30864355.
  66. Jabbour J, Chappell JR, Busby M, McCubbery NW, Brown DF, Park SJK; et al. (2019). “Glottic Obstruction from Fibroepithelial Polyp”. Am J Case Rep. 20: 219–223. doi:10.12659/AJCR.914907. PMC 6388646. PMID 30778021.
  67. Hong P, Cai Y, Li Z, Fan S, Yang K, Hao H; et al. (2019). “Modified Laparoscopic Partial Ureterectomy for Adult Ureteral Fibroepithelial Polyp: Technique and Initial Experience”. Urol Int. 102 (1): 13–19. doi:10.1159/000494804. PMID 30448831.
  68. Uçar M, Baş E, Akkoç A, Topçuoğlu M (2018). “Fibroepithelial Polyp of the Ureter: A Rare Cause of Hydronephrosis”. J Endourol Case Rep. 4 (1): 166–168. doi:10.1089/cren.2018.0031. PMC 6225073. PMID 30426076.
  69. Chaker K, Rhouma SB, Daly KM, Zehani A, Bibi M, Chehida MAB; et al. (2019). “Benign fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter: A case report”. Urol Case Rep. 22: 52–53. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2018.10.019. PMC 6226574. PMID 30425926.
  70. Hajji F, Moufid K, Ghoundale O, Touiti D (2019). “A rare case of successful endoscopic management of a fibroepithelial polyp with intussusception of the ureter and periodic prolapse into bladder”. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 101 (2): e66–e70. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2018.0198. PMC 6351868. PMID 30421620.
  71. Lee H, Sade I, Gilani S, Zhong M, Lombardo G (2018). “A Giant Fibroepithelial Polyp of the Small Bowel Associated with High-Grade Obstruction”. Am Surg. 84 (7): e210–e211. PMID 30401014.
  72. Chaker K (2019). “Benign fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter: A case report”. Urol Case Rep. 22: 15–16. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2018.09.021. PMC 6180234. PMID 30319938.
  73. Lozano-Peña AK, Lamadrid-Zertuche AC, Ocampo-Candiani J (2019). “Giant fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva”. Australas J Dermatol. 60 (1): 70–71. doi:10.1111/ajd.12886. PMID 30009441.
  74. Eckstein M, Agaimy A, Woenckhaus J, Winter A, Bittmann I, Janzen J; et al. (2019). “DICER1 mutation-positive giant botryoid fibroepithelial polyp of the urinary bladder mimicking embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma”. Hum Pathol. 84: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2018.05.015. PMID 29883781.
  75. Akdere H, Çevik G (2018). “Rare Fibroepithelial Polyp Extending Along the Ureter: A Case Report”. Balkan Med J. 35 (3): 275–277. doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.1537. PMC 5981127. PMID 29843497.
  76. Ballard DH, Rove KO, Coplen DE, Chen TY, Hulett Bowling RL (2018). “Fibroepithelial polyp causing urethral obstruction: Diagnosis by cystourethrogram”. Clin Imaging. 51: 164–167. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.009. PMC 6404776. PMID 29800931.
  77. Amin A, Amin Z, Al Farsi AR (2018). “Septic presentation of a giant fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva”. BMJ Case Rep. 2018. doi:10.1136/bcr-2017-222789. PMID 29574427.
  78. Gupta R, Smita S, Sinha R, Sinha N, Sinha L (2018). “Giant fibroepithelial polyp of the thigh and retroperitoneal fibromatosis in a young woman: a rare case”. Skeletal Radiol. 47 (9): 1299–1304. doi:10.1007/s00256-018-2904-x. PMID 29487969.
  79. Rajeesh Mohammed PK, Choudhury BK, Dalai RP, Rana V (2017). “Fibroepithelial Polyp with Sebaceous Hyperplasia: A Case Report”. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 38 (3): 404–406. doi:10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_124_17. PMC 5686997. PMID 29200704.
  80. Lee MH, Hwang JY, Lee JH, Kim DH, Song SH (2017). “Fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva accompanied by lymphangioma circumscriptum”. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 60 (4): 401–404. doi:10.5468/ogs.2017.60.4.401. PMC 5547092. PMID 28791276.
  81. Ten Donkelaar CS, Houwert AC, Ten Kate FJW, Lock MTWT (2017). “Polypoid arteriovenous malformation of the ureter mimicking a fibroepithelial polyp, a case report”. BMC Urol. 17 (1): 55. doi:10.1186/s12894-017-0237-z. PMC 5504856. PMID 28693464.
  82. Saito N, Yamasaki M, Daido W, Ishiyama S, Deguchi N, Taniwaki M (2017). “A bronchial fibroepithelial polyp with abnormal findings on auto-fluorescence imaging”. Respirol Case Rep. 5 (5): e00244. doi:10.1002/rcr2.244. PMC 5465754. PMID 28603622.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2], Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]

Overview

Neurofibroma usually occurs between 20-40 years of age, and affects men and women equally. However, plexiform neurofibromas are thought to be congenital defects, hence, they occur earlier in life.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Age

Gender

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2] Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]

Overview

Neurofibromatosis 1 and Neurofibromatosis 2 are the most common risk factors for development of neurofibromas.

Risk Factors

Following are the most common risk factors for formation of neurofibromas:[1]

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2] Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]

Overview

According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for neurofibroma.

Screening

According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for neurofibroma.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2] Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]

Overview

Prognosis of neurofibroma is generally excellent. If left untreated, 10% of patients with plexiform neurofibromas may progress to develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Local recurrence occurs rarely.

Natural History

Complications

Prognosis

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Mautner VF, Friedrich RE, von Deimling A, Hagel C, Korf B, Knöfel MT, Wenzel R, Fünsterer C. (2003). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: MRI supports the diagnosis of malignant plexiform neurofibroma”. American Journal of Pathology. 45 (9): 618–25. doi:10.1007/s00234-003-0964-6. PMID 12898075.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies | Biopsy

Treatment

Treatment

Medical therapy | Surgery | Primary prevention | Secondary prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Related Chapters

Template:Nervous tissue tumors


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH