Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Diabetic nephropathy

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1], Ali Poyan Mehr, M.D. [2]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Olufunmilola Olubukola M.D.[3]

Synonyms and keywords:: Kimmelstiel-Wilson disease; diabetic glomerulosclerosis; nephropathy-diabetic; diabetic glomerulonephropathy

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Ali Poyan Mehr, M.D. [2] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Olufunmilola Olubukola M.D.[3]

Overview

Diabetic kidney disease (Diabetic Nephropathy) is the most common cause of chronic kidney disease and end stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States [1] . Due to the ongoing world wide increase in the incidence of diabetes mellitus, Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is increasingly a major cause of ESRD disease worldwide [2].

Diabetic Nephropathy affects male and female patients equally. The incidence of DN in African-Americans, Native Americans and people of Mexican origins is greater than the incidence in white Americans [3]. Currently, the main goal in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy is to slow the progression of chronic kidney disease. This is achieved by excellent control of hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and blood pressure. Antiproteinuric therapy through renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system Inhibitors is considered to be a major pillar of the treatment [4]. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition it thought to be beneficial in the early stages of diabetic nephropathy through decreasing proteinuria and progression [5]. Therefore, early diagnosis and institution of prompt treatment is very important in the management of diabetes nephropathy. Also, the role of diabetes prevention becomes paramount patients at high risk (e.g. metabolic syndrome, impaired glucose tolerance).

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is characterized by the presence of proteinuria or decreased renal function in patients with diabetes mellitus[6][7][8] however, diabetic nephropathy can also present in form of non-proteinuric decline in GFR. Nonetheless, proteinuria remains the hallmark of diagnosis for diabetic nephropathy, despite emerging trends suggestive of non proteinuric diabetic nephropathy. [9]

Early Diabetic Nephropathy

The range of proteinuria in early DN is shown below[6][7][8]:

  • Males: Microalbuminuria in the range of 30-300 mg/24 hrs or a spot urinary albumin/creatinine ratio of 30-300 mg/g
  • Females: Microalbuminuria in the range of 30-300 mg/24 hrs or a spot urinary albumin/creatinine ratio of 20-200 mg/g

Overt Diabetic Nephropathy

Overt DN is defined according to the presence of proteinuria or according to renal function. The following ranges in overt DN are shown below[6][7][8]:

  • Proteinuria > 500 mg/24 hrs or albuminuria > 300 mg/24 hrs.
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73m2

Historical Perspective

Diabetic nephropathy was first described by Clifford Wilson and Paul Kimmelstiel in 1936.

Classification

Diabetic nephropathy can be classified according to the type of underlying diabetes mellitus or the histopathological findings of the disease.

Pathophysiology

Diabetic nephropathy is a serious complication in patients with long standing Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. It usually occurs in about 10 to 15 years following the onset of diabetes mellitus. Poor glycemic control, dyslipidemia, smoking, and environmental and genetic factors play important roles in the development of diabetic nephropathy.

Causes

The exact cause of diabetic nephropathy is unknown. However, it is thought that hyperfiltration through the renal glomeruli may be responsible for the manifestations of the disease.

Differentiating Diabetic nephropathy from other Diseases

Diabetic nephropathy should be differentiate from other causes of glomerular disease such as nephritic syndromenephrotic syndromeFabry’s disease, poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, lupus nephritisantiglomerular basement membrane disease (goodpasture’s syndrome)CryoglobulinemiaHenoch-Schönlein purpuraamyloidosis, pulmonary-renal syndromes (vasculitis), thin basement membrane diseaseAlport’s Syndromeanti-GBM Diseasehypertensive nephrosclerosis, and subacute bacterial endocarditis. The various types of glomerular diseases may be differentiated from each other based on associations, presence of pitting edema, hemeturia, hypertensionhemoptysisoliguria, peri-orbital edema, hyperlipidemia, type of antibodieslight and electron microscopic features.

Epidemiology and Demographics

In the United States, prevalence of diabetic nephropathy (DN) has increased from 7.4% to 9.6% within a 20 years period (1988 to 2008), and this trend will likely continue due to the increasing incidence of diabetes in the American populace . Studies by de Boer et al showed that DN accounts for 44% of new ESRD cases with 6% attributed to type 1 DM, 38% attributed to type 2 DM, and a projected increase of 3 million cases over the course of 20 years. This increased incidence and prevalence of DN is notably greater among African Americans, Asians, and Native Americans than it is among Caucasians.

Risk Factors

Risk factors of diabetic nephropathy can be modifiable such as hypertensiondyslipidemia, and smoking or non-modifiable such as advanced age and positive family history.

Screening

Microalbuminuria is an excellent tool for the early detection of diabetic nephropathy.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Patients with diabetic nephropathy can develop the manifestations of renal failure such as edema and unintentional weight gain late in the course of the disease.

Physical Examination

The majority of patients with diabetic nephropathy are asymptomatic. However, patients may present with other signs of diabetes mellitus or chronic renal failure.

Laboratory Findings

Microalbuminuria, as defined by an urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >30mg/g is an early diagnostic clue to diabetic nephropathy. Some patients may go on to develop high-grade nephrotic range proteinuria, while others may develop diabetic nephropathy without any measurable albuminuria.

Other Diagnostic Studies

The diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy is based on history, physical examination and laboratory investigations. Renal imaging, such as ultrasound, is often done to rule out other kidney and urinary tract pathologies. However, the ultrasound findings in diabetic nephropathy are highly non-specific and may be normal. Some of the findings in chronic kidney disease due to diabetic nephropathy or other causes include: reduced renal length, reduced renal cortical thickness, increased renal cortical echogenicity, poor visibility of the renal pyramids and the renal sinus, marginal irregularities, papillary calcifications.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The goals of treatment are to slow the progression of kidney damage and control related complications. The main treatment, once proteinuria is established, is ACE inhibitor drugs, which usually reduce glomerular hypertension, proteinuria levels, systemic hypertension and slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy.

Primary Prevention

Primary prevention of diabetic nephropathy is aimed at preventing diabetes in the first place.

Secondary Prevention

Once diabetic nephropathy develops, secondary prevention to halt the progression of the disease is aimed at strict control of blood pressure, blood glucose levels, as well as lipids.

References

  1. John S (2016). “Complication in diabetic nephropathy”. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 10 (4): 247–249. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2016.06.005. PMID 27389078.
  2. Tuttle KR, Bakris GL, Bilous RW, Chiang JL, de Boer IH, Goldstein-Fuchs J; et al. (2014). “Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference”. Diabetes Care. 37 (10): 2864–83. doi:10.2337/dc14-1296. PMC 4170131. PMID 25249672.
  3. Baudy A, Batuman V (2015). “Non-diabetic renal disease in diabetic patients: How to identify? When to biopsy?”. J Diabetes Complications. 29 (5): 613–4. doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.04.015. PMID 25957005.
  4. Lozano-Maneiro L, Puente-García A (2015). “Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade in Diabetic Nephropathy. Present Evidences”. J Clin Med. 4 (11): 1908–37. doi:10.3390/jcm4111908. PMC 4663476. PMID 26569322.
  5. Kasiske BL, Kalil RS, Ma JZ, Liao M, Keane WF (1993). “Effect of antihypertensive therapy on the kidney in patients with diabetes: a meta-regression analysis”. Ann Intern Med. 118 (2): 129–38. PMID 8416309.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Mogensen CE, Christensen CK (1984). “Predicting diabetic nephropathy in insulin-dependent patients”. N Engl J Med. 311 (2): 89–93. doi:10.1056/NEJM198407123110204. PMID 6738599.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Mogensen CE (1984). “Microalbuminuria predicts clinical proteinuria and early mortality in maturity-onset diabetes”. N Engl J Med. 310 (6): 356–60. doi:10.1056/NEJM198402093100605. PMID 6690964.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Reutens AT, Atkins RC (2011). “Epidemiology of diabetic nephropathy”. Contrib Nephrol. 170: 1–7. doi:10.1159/000324934. PMID 21659752.
  9. MacIsaac RJ, Panagiotopoulos S, McNeil KJ, Smith TJ, Tsalamandris C, Hao H; et al. (2006). “Is nonalbuminuric renal insufficiency in type 2 diabetes related to an increase in intrarenal vascular disease?”. Diabetes Care. 29 (7): 1560–6. doi:10.2337/dc05-1788. PMID 16801579.

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]

Overview

Diabetic nephropathy was first described by Clifford Wilson and Paul Kimmelstiel in 1936.

Historical Perspective

  • Diabetic nephropathy was first described by Clifford Wilson and Paul Kimmelstiel in 1936.[1]
  • Diabetic nephropathy is often called Wilson-Kimmelstiel syndrome after the two scientists.

References

  1. Bergstrand A, Ostman J (January 1984). “[The men behind the syndrome: Paul Kimmelstiel and Clifford Wilson. A German and an Englishman who met at Harvard – the first ones to describe a special glomerulus lesion]”. Lakartidningen (in Swedish). 81 (4): 227–8. PMID 6366406.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Dima Nimri, M.D. [2]

Overview

Diabetic nephropathy can be classified according to the type of underlying diabetes mellitus or the histopathological findings of the disease.

Classification

Diabetic nephropathy can be classified according to the type of diabetes which resulted in the disease process. Another method of classification is based on the histopathological findings in diabetic nephropathy.

Type of Diabetes

Distinguishing Type I vs. Type II Diabetic Nephropathy[1]
Type of Diabetes Frequency Heterogeneity Severity of Glomerulopathy
Type I *20% of diabetes-related ESRD
*Renal lesions more frequently attributed to diabetes
Usually less heterogenous lesions *More severe
*Clinical severity associated with renal findings
Type II *80% of diabetes-related ESRD
*Renal lesions may often be non-diabetic
Usually more heterogeneous lesions *Less severe
*Clinical severity and association with renal findings is variable
Adapted from Najafian B, Alpers CE, Fogo AB. Pathology of human diabetic nephropathy. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;170:36-47

Histopathological findings directly correlate with clinical signs and symptoms. The extent of mesangial expansion is inversely associated with the estiamted glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albumin excretion rate (AER).[2][3][4] Podocyte injury is also correlated with the degree of proteinuria in diabetic patients; proteinuria is frequently seen when more than 20% of podocytes are denuded from the GBM.[5]

Histopathological Findings of Diabetic Nephropathy

The following table summarizes a classification system proposed in 2010 that correlates histopathological findings with severity of diabetic nephropathy:

Classification of Diabetic Nephropathy According to Histopathological Findings (2010)[6]
Class Findings Inclusion Criteria
I *Thickening of GBM on electron microscopy
*Mild or no changes on light microscopy
*Biopsy does not meet criterial mentioned for class II, III, or IV
*GB width by electron microscopy measuring > 395 nm in female and > 430 nm in male patients aged 9 years and above
IIa Mild mesangial expansion *Biopsy does not meet criteria for class III or IV
*Mild mesangial expansion in > 25% of observed mesangium
IIb *Severe mesangial expansion *Biopsy does not meet criteria for class III or IV
*Severe mesangial expansion in > 25% of observed mesangium
III Nodular sclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson nodules) *Biopsy does not meet criteria for class IV
*At least one Kimmelstiel-Wilson nodule
IV Advanced diabetic glomerulosclerosis *Global glomerular slerosis in > 50% of glomeruli
*Lesions from classes I through III
Adapted from Tervaert TW, Mooyaart AL, Amann K, et al. Pathologic classification of diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(4):556-63

References

  1. Najafian B, Alpers CE, Fogo AB (2011). “Pathology of human diabetic nephropathy”. Contrib Nephrol. 170: 36–47. doi:10.1159/000324942. PMID 21659756.
  2. Mauer SM, Steffes MW, Ellis EN, Sutherland DE, Brown DM, Goetz FC (1984). “Structural-functional relationships in diabetic nephropathy”. J Clin Invest. 74 (4): 1143–55. doi:10.1172/JCI111523. PMC 425280. PMID 6480821.
  3. Ellis EN, Steffes MW, Goetz FC, Sutherland DE, Mauer SM (1986). “Glomerular filtration surface in type I diabetes mellitus”. Kidney Int. 29 (4): 889–94. PMID 3712971.
  4. Caramori ML, Kim Y, Huang C, Fish AJ, Rich SS, Miller ME; et al. (2002). “Cellular basis of diabetic nephropathy: 1. Study design and renal structural-functional relationships in patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes”. Diabetes. 51 (2): 506–13. PMID 11812762.
  5. Toyoda M, Najafian B, Kim Y, Caramori ML, Mauer M (2007). “Podocyte detachment and reduced glomerular capillary endothelial fenestration in human type 1 diabetic nephropathy”. Diabetes. 56 (8): 2155–60. doi:10.2337/db07-0019. PMID 17536064.
  6. Tervaert TW, Mooyaart AL, Amann K, Cohen AH, Cook HT, Drachenberg CB; et al. (2010). “Pathologic classification of diabetic nephropathy”. J Am Soc Nephrol. 21 (4): 556–63. doi:10.1681/ASN.2010010010. PMID 20167701.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Dima Nimri, M.D. [2]

Overview

The hallmark of diabetic nephropathy is mesangial expansion. Nonetheless, diabetic nephropathy is characterized by the presence of abnormalities in the glomeruli, such as glomerular hypertrophy, in the tubules and interstitium, such as tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis, and in the blood vessels, such as arteriosclerosis in both the afferent and the efferent renal arterioles. Findings on histopathological analysis may be evident very early in diabetes, but are often clinically present approximately 15 years after the onset of metabolic abnormalities. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is characterized by the presence of proteinuria or decreased renal function in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic nephropathy may be early or overt.

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of diabetic nephropathy is related to chronic hyperglycemia. However, it is not completely understood. It is thought to be related to the effects of the following:

Early disease

The onset of diabetic nephropathy generally occurs at least 15 years after the onset of diabetes mellitus. The pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy occurs in distinct stages. Early pathogenesis – which may start as early as 2 years after the onset of diabetes – may include no visible lesions with mild global and diffuse hypertrophy of the renal glomeruli only. This process is called “GBM thickening”, a linear process that is caused by the accumulation of extracellular matrix.[1] These changes may not be detectable by light microscopy and require electron microscopy to identify. When the accumulation of the extracellular matrix becomes significant, pathological changes on light microscopy will be evident, typically first seen 5 years after onset of type 1 diabetes and usually occurs at a faster frequency after 15 years of onset. While an increase in cellularity is often observed early in the disease, mesangial expansion without hypercellularity is common as the disease further progresses. Disorganized mesangial expansion – the hallmark of diabetic nephropathy – is not a linear process and is in fact the result of a vicious circle that is characterized by the presence of frequently mesangiolysis followed by the formation of micro-aneurysms and balloon formation of glomeruli, hyaline accumulation, and mesangial repair with concomitant thickening of the GBM lamina densa.

Advanced disease

Advanced diabetic nephropathy is typically seen approximately 15 years after the onset of diabetes type I. It is characterized by the abundant sclerosis of the mesangium and mesangial expansion in an irregular nodular (round/oval) pattern, called Kimmelstiel-Wilson nodules.[2] These nodules are acellular or pauci-cellular nodules with a lamellated appearance that stain positively by silver methenamine stain.[2] They are a non-specific finding in diabetic nephropathy but are frequently found in glomerular tufts in up to 25% of patients with advanced diabetic nephropathy.[2] Kimmelsteil-Wilson nodules may also be found in other disease entities, such as multiple myeloma and other gammopathies, membranoproliferative glomerulopathies, post-infectious glomerulonephritis, amyloidosis, as well as idiopathic nodular glomerulosclerosis in patients with no renal disease.

Hyalinosis, defined as the exudation of hyaline material (usually lipid particles) between the basement membrane of Bowman’s capsule and the parietal epithelium.[2] Meanwhile, the irreversible loss of podocytes plays a crucial role in the disease pathogenesis and the clinical finding of proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Podocyte injury first starts with widening of the podocyte foot processes with consequent detachment from the GBM.[3] As podocytes are lost, glomerulotubular junctions are exposed to further injury and formation of atubular glomeruli. Typically, patients with diabetic nephropathy do not demonstrate any specific findings on immunofluorescence, but IgG deposition is common in these patients. The presence of IgG is not believed to be a cause of the disease, but rather as a by-product due to the presence of an abnormal sticky GBM.[2]

Gross Pathology

In the early stages of diabetic nephropathy, there is renal hypertrophy, due to expansion of the glomeruli. The resultant increase in kidney size is due to enlargement of the mesangium, the glomerular basement membrane, as well as the afferent and efferent renal arterioles. However, in the later stages of diabetic nephropathy and ESRD, the kidneys become small and atrophic, with diffuse glomerulosclerosis.

Microscopic Pathology

Nodular glomerulosclerosis in two kidney glomeruli – Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2740312

Glomerular Lesions[2]

Light Microscopy

Immunofluorescence

Electron Microscopy

Lesions of Tubules & Interstitium[2]

Light Microscopy

Immunofluorescence

Electron Microscopy

Blood Vessels[2]

Light Microscopy

Immunofluorescence

  • No specific changes

Electron Microscopy

  • Subendothelial and transmural hyaline arterial deposition in small arteries and arterioles

References

  1. Drummond K, Mauer M, International Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group (2002). “The early natural history of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: II. Early renal structural changes in type 1 diabetes”. Diabetes. 51 (5): 1580–7. PMID 11978659.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Najafian B, Alpers CE, Fogo AB (2011). “Pathology of human diabetic nephropathy”. Contrib Nephrol. 170: 36–47. doi:10.1159/000324942. PMID 21659756.
  3. Toyoda M, Najafian B, Kim Y, Caramori ML, Mauer M (2007). “Podocyte detachment and reduced glomerular capillary endothelial fenestration in human type 1 diabetic nephropathy”. Diabetes. 56 (8): 2155–60. doi:10.2337/db07-0019. PMID 17536064.
Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Dima Nimri, M.D. [2]

Overview

Diabetes mellitus both type1 and type 2 is the major cause. It is thought to be due to hyperfiltration through the renal glomeruli. The chances of developing diabetic nephropathy is markedly increased in patients with a diabetic sibling or parent who has diabetic nephropathy. these observations have been seen in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The genetic basis underlying the heritability of diabetic nephropathy is not known.

Causes

  • Diabetes, type 1 or 2
  • Persistent, uncontrolled hyperglycemia
  • Hypertension in the presence of diabetes.
  • Diabetes with smoking
  • High blood cholesterol and diabetes
  • Genetic factors

References[1]

Template:WH Template:WS

  1. Chang MS, Hsu YH (July 2018). “The role of IL-20 in chronic kidney disease and diabetic nephropathy: Pathogenic and therapeutic implications”. J. Leukoc. Biol. doi:10.1002/JLB.MR1217-489R. PMID 29999545.
Differentiating Diabetic nephropathy from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mehrian Jafarizade, M.D [2]

Overview

Diabetic nephropathy should be differentiated from other causes of glomerular disease such as nephritic syndrome, nephrotic syndrome, Fabry’s disease, poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, lupus nephritis, antiglomerular basement membrane disease (goodpasture’s syndrome), Cryoglobulinemia, Henoch-Schönlein purpuraamyloidosis, pulmonary-renal syndromes (vasculitis), thin basement membrane disease, Alport’s Syndrome, anti-GBM Disease, hypertensive nephrosclerosis, and subacute bacterial endocarditis. The various types of glomerular diseases may be differentiated from each other based on associations, presence of pitting edema, hematuria, hypertension, hemoptysis, oliguria, peri-orbital edema, hyperlipidemia, type of antibodies, light and electron microscopic features.

Differential Diagnosis

Diabetic nephropathy should be differentiated from other causes of glomerular disease. The various types of glomerular diseases may be differentiated from each other based on associations, presence of pitting edema, hematuria, hypertension, hemoptysis, oliguria, peri-orbital edema, hyperlipidemia, type of antibodies, light and electron microscopic features. The following table differentiates between various types of glomerular diseases:

Glomerular diseases Disease History and Symtoms Laboratory Findings Pathology
History Systemic symptoms Hemeturia Proteinuria Hypertension Pitting edema Oliguria Nephrotic features Nephritic features Hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia Auto-antibodies,

Complements

Light microscope Electron microscope Immunoflourescence pattern
Acute Nephritic Syndromes Poststreptococcal Glomerulonephritis[1][2][3] +/- + +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/-
  • Immune complex GN
  • Granular deposit
Renal disease due to Subacute Bacterial Endocarditis, or cardiac shunt (Atrioventricular)[4][5] +/- + +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/-
  • Crescentic GN is the most common pathological features
  • Mesangial deposits,
  • Subendothelial deposits
  • Subepithelial “humps,” in minority of cases
  • Pauci-immune GN
Lupus Nephritis[6]
  • History of SLE features
+/- + +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/-
  • Differs based on the disease classification
  • Differs based on the disease classification
  • Differs based on the disease classification, mostly immune complex GN
  • Granular deposit
Antiglomerular Basement Membrane Disease (Goodpasture’s syndrome)[7][8]
  • Young adults
+ + + + + + Diffuse thickening of the glomerular basement membrane with absence of sub-epithelial and sub-endothelial deposits 
  • Immune complex GN
  • Linear deposit
IgA Nephropathy[9][10] + +/- + +/- + +
  • Immune complex deposition
  • Crescent formation
  • Immune complex GN, granular deposite
Disease History Systemic symptoms Hemeturia Proteinuria Hypertension Pitting edema Oliguria Nephrotic features Nephritic features Hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia Auto-antibodies,

Complements

Light microscope Electron microscope Immunoflourescence pattern
ANCA Small-Vessel Vasculitis[11][12] Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (Wegener’s)[13][14][15]
  • Middle age male
+ + + +/- + +
  •  Pauci-immune GN
Microscopic Polyangiitis[16] +/- + + + + + +
  •  Pauci-immune GN
Churg-Strauss Syndrome[17] +/- + + + + + +
  •  Pauci-immune GN
Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis[18][19] + + + +/- + +
  • Immune complex GN
  • Granular deposite
Henoch-Schönlein purpura [20] + + + +/- + +
  • Diffuse mesangial IgA deposits often associated with mesangial hypercellularity
  • Diffuse mesangial IgA deposits often associated with mesangial hypercellularity
  • Immune complex GN, granular deposite
Disease History Systemic symptoms Hemeturia Proteinuria Hypertension Pitting edema Oliguria Nephrotic features Nephritic features Hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia Auto-antibodies,

Complements

Light microscope Electron microscope Immunoflourescence pattern
Cryoglobulinemia[21] Patients having cryoglobulinemia may have positive history of: Pulmonary symptoms:
  • Cough

Cutaneous symptoms:

Gastrointestinal symptoms:

  • Abdominal pain

General symptoms:

+/- + +/- + +/- +/- +/- +/- +/-
  • Prominent IgM and C3
Nephrotic Syndrome Minimal Change Disease[22][23] + + +/- + +
  • Normal
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis[24][25][26] + + +/- + +
Membranous Glomerulonephritis[27][28] + + +/- + + Immune complex deposition Immune complex GN, granular deposite
Diabetic Nephropathy[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] For more information on diabetes click here. + + +/- + +
  • Diffuse mesangial matrix expansion (nodular glomerulosclerosis)
  • Increased mesangial hypercellularity
  • Prominent glomerular basement membranes
  • Thick basement membrane without any deposit
  • Nodular glomerulosclerosis
Disease History Systemic symptoms Hemeturia Proteinuria Hypertension Pitting edema Oliguria Nephrotic features Nephritic features Hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia Auto-antibodies,

Complements

Light microscope Electron microscope Immunoflourescence pattern
 Glomerular Deposition Diseases  Light Chain Deposition Disease[39]
  • Occurs in the setting of high tumor burden
+ + +/- + +
  • Light-chain deposits
  • Granular deposits on electron microscopy
  • Detection of light chain deposits using anti–light chain antibody
Renal Amyloidosis[40][41][42][43] + + +/- + +
  • Diffuse glomerular deposition of amorphous hyaline material (nodular pattern), in mesangium (weakly staining with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)
  • Nodular deposit
  • AA amyloidosis type: negative for immunoglobulins and complement
  • AL amyloidosis type: Positive for lambda or kappa light chains
Fibrillary-Immunotactoid Glomerulopathy[44] +/- + +/- +/- +/- + +/- +/-
  • Diffuse sclerosing glomerulonephritis
  • Diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis
  • Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis
  • Mesangioproliferative/sclerosing disease
  • Membranous glomerulonephritis
  • Large fibrillar deposits in the mesangium randomly
  • Glomerular capillary walls different from amloidosis
  • No staining with Congo red or thioflavine-T or with antibodies to a specific type
  • Positive for immunoglobulin G (IgG), C3
  • Kappa and lambda (ie, polyclonal) light chains
Fabry’s Disease[45][46][47] + + +/- + +
  • Vacuolization of visceral glomerular epithelial cells (podocytes) and distal tubular epithelial cells
  • Glycolipid accumulation
  • Myeloid or zebra bodies: Gb3 deposition within enlarged secondary lysosomes as lamellated membrane structures
  • Inclusions, composed of concentric layers (onion skin appearance)
Basement Membrane Syndrome Alport’s Syndrome[48][49][50][51][52][53]
  • Positive family history
Auditary:

Occular problems:

  • Refractory Error
+ + +/- + +
  • Early stage: unremarkable
Disease History Systemic symptoms Hemeturia Proteinuria Hypertension Pitting edema Oliguria Nephrotic features Nephritic features Hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia Auto-antibodies,

Complements

Light microscope Electron microscope Immunoflourescence pattern
Thin Basement Membrane Disease[54][55]
  • Positive family history
+ -/+ -/+ -/+ Diffuse thinning of the glomerular basement membranes (GBM)
Nail-Patella Syndrome[56][57]
  • Positive family history
  • Poorly developed fingernails, toe nails, and patellae (kneecaps).
  • Elbow deformities
  • Abnormally shaped pelvis bone (hip bone)
  • Knee may be small, deformed or absent
+ +
  • Mostly unremarkable changes
  • Secondary FSGS
  • Late stages:
    • Global glomerulosclerosis,
    • Tubulointerstitial fibrosis
  • Glomerular basement membranes (GBMs): Focal or diffuse irregular thickening with electron-lucent areas (moth-eaten appearance) containing type III collagen bundles.
  • Similar collagen fibrils can be seen in mesangial matrix.
  • Podocytes: Segmental effacement of foot processes.
  • Nonspecific IgM and C3 deposition may be seen in sclerotic glomeruli.
 Glomerular-Vascular Syndromes  Hypertensive Nephrosclerosis[58] Chronic hypertension +/- +/- + +/- +/- +/- +/-
  • Interstitial fibrosis and atrophy
  • Medial thickening and intimal fibrosis of medium-sized and larger vessels
  • Arteriolar thickening, and hyalinosis
  • Chronic stages:
Cholesterol Emboli[59]
  • Depends on the organ involved
+/- +/- + +/- +/- +/- +/-
  • Atheroemboli are seen in interlobular and arcuate arteries, as lance-shaped clefts, due to dissolution of cholesterol crystals
  • Acute lesions:
    • Atheroemboli are surrounded by red blood cells, fibrin, and leukocytes, with multinucleated giant cell reactions
  • Chronic lesions:
    • Cholesterol clefts are surrounded by intimal fibrosis
    • Vessel recanalization of chronic lesions can occur.
  • Global and segmental sclerosis of glomeruli may be present.
  • Extensive foot process effacement can be seen
  • Not specific changes
Disease History Systemic symptoms Hemeturia Proteinuria Hypertension Pitting edema Oliguria Nephrotic features Nephritic features Hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia Auto-antibodies,

Complements

Light microscope Electron microscope Immunoflourescence pattern
Sickle Cell Disease[60]
  • Positive family history
+/- +/- +/-
  • Glomerular hypertrophy
  • Hemosiderin deposits
  • Focal areas of hemorrhage or necrosis
  • Chronic stage: interstitial inflammation, edema, fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and papillary infarcts
  • Glomerular enlargement and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)
Thrombotic Microangiopathies[61] Click for more information on Thrombotic Microangiopathies. + +/- + +/- +/- +/-
  • Acute stage:
    • Inravasculr fibrin thrombi
  • Chronic stage:
    • Endocapillary hypercellularity.
    • Intimal proliferation of arterioles
  • Swollen glomerular endothelial cells with loss of fenestrations
  • Chronic stage: interposed cells with new GBM matrix material deposition.
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome [62][63][64]
  • Fatigue
  • Fever
  • Weight loss
+ +/- + +/- +/- +/-
  • Swollen glomerular endothelial cells with loss of fenestrations
  • Chronic stage: interposed cells with new GBM matrix material deposition.


Some infectious diseases such as HIV, HBV, HCV, syphilis, leprosy, malaria, and schistosomiasis may cause glomerular diseases.

References

  1. GERMUTH FG (1953). “A comparative histologic and immunologic study in rabbits of induced hypersensitivity of the serum sickness type”. J Exp Med. 97 (2): 257–82. PMC 2136196. PMID 13022878.
  2. Germuth FG, Senterfit LB, Dreesman GR (1972). “Immune complex disease. V. The nature of the circulating complexes associated with glomerular alterations in the chronic BSA-rabbit system”. Johns Hopkins Med J. 130 (6): 344–57. PMID 5031005.
  3. Radhakrishnan J, Cattran DC (2012). “The KDIGO practice guideline on glomerulonephritis: reading between the (guide)lines–application to the individual patient”. Kidney Int. 82 (8): 840–56. doi:10.1038/ki.2012.280. PMID 22895519.
  4. Neugarten J, Baldwin DS (August 1984). “Glomerulonephritis in bacterial endocarditis”. Am. J. Med. 77 (2): 297–304. PMID 6380288.
  5. Arze RS, Rashid H, Morley R, Ward MK, Kerr DN (January 1983). “Shunt nephritis: report of two cases and review of the literature”. Clin. Nephrol. 19 (1): 48–53. PMID 6831779.
  6. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, Balow JE, Bruijn JA, Cook T, Ferrario F, Fogo AB, Ginzler EM, Hebert L, Hill G, Hill P, Jennette JC, Kong NC, Lesavre P, Lockshin M, Looi LM, Makino H, Moura LA, Nagata M (February 2004). “The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited”. Kidney Int. 65 (2): 521–30. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00443.x. PMID 14717922.
  7. Bolton WK (November 1996). “Goodpasture’s syndrome”. Kidney Int. 50 (5): 1753–66. PMID 8914046.
  8. Mathew TH, Hobbs JB, Kalowski S, Sutherland PW, Kincaid-Smith P (February 1975). “Goodpasture’s syndrome: normal renal diagnostic findings”. Ann. Intern. Med. 82 (2): 215–8. PMID 1090223.
  9. Suzuki H, Kiryluk K, Novak J, Moldoveanu Z, Herr AB, Renfrow MB, Wyatt RJ, Scolari F, Mestecky J, Gharavi AG, Julian BA (October 2011). “The pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 22 (10): 1795–803. doi:10.1681/ASN.2011050464. PMC 3892742. PMID 21949093.
  10. Wyatt RJ, Julian BA (June 2013). “IgA nephropathy”. N. Engl. J. Med. 368 (25): 2402–14. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1206793. PMID 23782179.
  11. Higgins RM, Goldsmith DJ, Connolly J, Scoble JE, Hendry BM, Ackrill P, Venning MC (January 1996). “Vasculitis and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in the elderly”. Postgrad Med J. 72 (843): 41–4. PMC 2398323. PMID 8746284.
  12. Jennette JC (March 2003). “Rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis”. Kidney Int. 63 (3): 1164–77. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00843.x. PMID 12631105.
  13. Renaudineau Y, Le Meur Y (October 2008). “Renal involvement in Wegener’s granulomatosis”. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 35 (1–2): 22–9. doi:10.1007/s12016-007-8066-6. PMID 18172777.
  14. Weiss MA, Crissman JD (October 1984). “Renal biopsy findings in Wegener’s granulomatosis: segmental necrotizing glomerulonephritis with glomerular thrombosis”. Hum. Pathol. 15 (10): 943–56. PMID 6384024.
  15. Pagnoux C (March 2008). “[Wegener’s granulomatosis and microscopic polyangiitis]”. Rev Prat (in French). 58 (5): 522–32. PMID 18524109.
  16. Chung SA, Seo P (August 2010). “Microscopic polyangiitis”. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 36 (3): 545–58. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2010.04.003. PMC 2917831. PMID 20688249.
  17. Sinico RA, Di Toma L, Maggiore U, Tosoni C, Bottero P, Sabadini E, Giammarresi G, Tumiati B, Gregorini G, Pesci A, Monti S, Balestrieri G, Garini G, Vecchio F, Buzio C (May 2006). “Renal involvement in Churg-Strauss syndrome”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 47 (5): 770–9. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.01.026. PMID 16632015.
  18. Alchi B, Jayne D (August 2010). “Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis”. Pediatr. Nephrol. 25 (8): 1409–18. doi:10.1007/s00467-009-1322-7. PMC 2887509. PMID 19908070.
  19. Davis AE, Schneeberger EE, Grupe WE, McCluskey RT (May 1978). “Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN type I) and dense deposit disease (DDD) in children”. Clin. Nephrol. 9 (5): 184–93. PMID 657595.
  20. Jennette JC, Falk RJ (July 1994). “The pathology of vasculitis involving the kidney”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 24 (1): 130–41. PMID 8023818.
  21. Fogo AB, Lusco MA, Najafian B, Alpers CE (February 2016). “AJKD Atlas of Renal Pathology: Cryoglobulinemic Glomerulonephritis”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 67 (2): e5–7. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.12.007. PMID 26802335.
  22. Saha TC, Singh H (November 2006). “Minimal change disease: a review”. South. Med. J. 99 (11): 1264–70. doi:10.1097/01.smj.0000243183.87381.c2. PMID 17195422.
  23. Saleem MA, Kobayashi Y (2016). “Cell biology and genetics of minimal change disease”. F1000Res. 5. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7300.1. PMC 4821284. PMID 27092244.
  24. Rosenberg AZ, Kopp JB (March 2017). “Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 12 (3): 502–517. doi:10.2215/CJN.05960616. PMC 5338705. PMID 28242845.
  25. Jefferson JA, Shankland SJ (September 2014). “The pathogenesis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis”. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 21 (5): 408–16. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2014.05.009. PMC 4149756. PMID 25168829.
  26. Gephardt GN, Tubbs RR, Popowniak KL, McMahon JT (October 1986). “Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis. Immunohistologic study of 20 renal biopsy specimens”. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 110 (10): 902–5. PMID 2429634.
  27. Lai WL, Yeh TH, Chen PM, Chan CK, Chiang WC, Chen YM, Wu KD, Tsai TJ (February 2015). “Membranous nephropathy: a review on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment”. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 114 (2): 102–11. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2014.11.002. PMID 25558821.
  28. Wasserstein AG (April 1997). “Membranous glomerulonephritis”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 8 (4): 664–74. PMID 10495797.
  29. Drummond K, Mauer M, International Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group (2002). “The early natural history of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: II. Early renal structural changes in type 1 diabetes”. Diabetes. 51 (5): 1580–7. PMID 11978659.
  30. Hørlyck A, Gundersen HJ, Osterby R (1986). “The cortical distribution pattern of diabetic glomerulopathy”. Diabetologia. 29 (3): 146–50. PMID 3699305.
  31. Alpers CE, Hudkins KL (2011). “Mouse models of diabetic nephropathy”. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 20 (3): 278–84. doi:10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283451901. PMC 3658822. PMID 21422926.
  32. Kimmelstiel P, Wilson C (1936). “Intercapillary Lesions in the Glomeruli of the Kidney”. Am J Pathol. 12 (1): 83–98.7. PMC 1911022. PMID 19970254.
  33. Alpers CE, Biava CG (1989). “Idiopathic lobular glomerulonephritis (nodular mesangial sclerosis): a distinct diagnostic entity”. Clin Nephrol. 32 (2): 68–74. PMID 2766585.
  34. Toyoda M, Najafian B, Kim Y, Caramori ML, Mauer M (2007). “Podocyte detachment and reduced glomerular capillary endothelial fenestration in human type 1 diabetic nephropathy”. Diabetes. 56 (8): 2155–60. doi:10.2337/db07-0019. PMID 17536064.
  35. Najafian B, Crosson JT, Kim Y, Mauer M (2006). “Glomerulotubular junction abnormalities are associated with proteinuria in type 1 diabetes”. J Am Soc Nephrol. 17 (4 Suppl 2): S53–60. doi:10.1681/ASN.2005121342. PMID 16565248.
  36. Najafian B, Kim Y, Crosson JT, Mauer M (2003). “Atubular glomeruli and glomerulotubular junction abnormalities in diabetic nephropathy”. J Am Soc Nephrol. 14 (4): 908–17. PMID 12660325.
  37. Najafian B, Alpers CE, Fogo AB (2011). “Pathology of human diabetic nephropathy”. Contrib Nephrol. 170: 36–47. doi:10.1159/000324942. PMID 21659756.
  38. Najafian B, Alpers CE, Fogo AB (2011). “Pathology of human diabetic nephropathy”. Contrib Nephrol. 170: 36–47. doi:10.1159/000324942. PMID 21659756.
  39. Hutchison CA, Cockwell P, Stringer S, Bradwell A, Cook M, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, Winters JL, Kumar S, Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Leung N (June 2011). “Early reduction of serum-free light chains associates with renal recovery in myeloma kidney”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 22 (6): 1129–36. doi:10.1681/ASN.2010080857. PMC 3103732. PMID 21511832.
  40. Baker KR, Rice L (2012). “The amyloidoses: clinical features, diagnosis and treatment”. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 8 (3): 3–7. PMC 3487569. PMID 23227278.
  41. Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN (October 2013). “Pathophysiology and treatment of systemic amyloidosis”. Nat Rev Nephrol. 9 (10): 574–86. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2013.171. PMID 23979488.
  42. Jerzykowska S, Cymerys M, Gil LA, Balcerzak A, Pupek-Musialik D, Komarnicki MA (2014). “Primary systemic amyloidosis as a real diagnostic challenge – case study”. Cent Eur J Immunol. 39 (1): 61–6. doi:10.5114/ceji.2014.42126. PMC 4439975. PMID 26155101.
  43. Pepys MB (2006). “Amyloidosis”. Annu. Rev. Med. 57: 223–41. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131243. PMID 16409147.
  44. Korbet SM, Schwartz MM, Lewis EJ (March 1991). “Immunotactoid glomerulopathy”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 17 (3): 247–57. PMID 1996564.
  45. Alroy J, Sabnis S, Kopp JB (June 2002). “Renal pathology in Fabry disease”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13 Suppl 2: S134–8. PMID 12068025.
  46. Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, Clague AE, Carey WF (1999). “Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders”. JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association. 281 (3): 249–54. PMID 9918480. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  47. Branton MH, Schiffmann R, Sabnis SG; et al. (2002). “Natural history of Fabry renal disease: influence of alpha-galactosidase A activity and genetic mutations on clinical course”. Medicine. 81 (2): 122–38. PMID 11889412. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  48. McCarthy PA, Maino DM (2000). “Alport syndrome: a review”. Clin Eye Vis Care. 12 (3–4): 139–150. PMID 11137428.
  49. Chugh KS, Sakhuja V, Agarwal A, Jha V, Joshi K, Datta BN; et al. (1993). “Hereditary nephritis (Alport’s syndrome)–clinical profile and inheritance in 28 kindreds”. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 8 (8): 690–5. PMID 8414153.
  50. Chugh KS, Sakhuja V, Agarwal A, Jha V, Joshi K, Datta BN; et al. (1993). “Hereditary nephritis (Alport’s syndrome)–clinical profile and inheritance in 28 kindreds”. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 8 (8): 690–5. PMID 8414153.
  51. McCarthy PA, Maino DM (2000). “Alport syndrome: a review”. Clin Eye Vis Care. 12 (3–4): 139–150. PMID 11137428.
  52. Amari F, Segawa K, Ando F (1994). “Lens coloboma and Alport-like glomerulonephritis”. Eur J Ophthalmol. 4 (3): 181–3. PMID 7819734.
  53. Govan JA (1983). “Ocular manifestations of Alport’s syndrome: a hereditary disorder of basement membranes?”. Br J Ophthalmol. 67 (8): 493–503. PMC 1040106. PMID 6871140.
  54. Savige J, Rana K, Tonna S, Buzza M, Dagher H, Wang YY (2003). “Thin basement membrane nephropathy”. Kidney Int. 64 (4): 1169–78. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00234.x. PMID 12969134. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  55. Hou P, Chen Y, Ding J, Li G, Zhang H (2007). “A novel mutation of COL4A3 presents a different contribution to Alport syndrome and thin basement membrane nephropathy”. Am. J. Nephrol. 27 (5): 538–44. doi:10.1159/000107666. PMID 17726307.
  56. Najafian B, Smith K, Lusco MA, Alpers CE, Fogo AB (October 2017). “AJKD Atlas of Renal Pathology: Nail-Patella Syndrome-Associated Nephropathy”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 70 (4): e19–e20. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.001. PMID 28941488.
  57. Guidera KJ, Satterwhite Y, Ogden JA, Pugh L, Ganey T (1991). “Nail patella syndrome: a review of 44 orthopaedic patients”. J Pediatr Orthop. 11 (6): 737–42. PMID 1960197.
  58. Hughson MD, Puelles VG, Hoy WE, Douglas-Denton RN, Mott SA, Bertram JF (July 2014). “Hypertension, glomerular hypertrophy and nephrosclerosis: the effect of race”. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 29 (7): 1399–409. doi:10.1093/ndt/gft480. PMC 4071048. PMID 24327566.
  59. Lusco MA, Najafian B, Alpers CE, Fogo AB (April 2016). “AJKD Atlas of Renal Pathology: Cholesterol Emboli”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 67 (4): e23–4. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.02.034. PMID 27012950.
  60. Wesson DE (June 2002). “The initiation and progression of sickle cell nephropathy”. Kidney Int. 61 (6): 2277–86. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00363.x. PMID 12028473.
  61. Lusco MA, Fogo AB, Najafian B, Alpers CE (December 2016). “AJKD Atlas of Renal Pathology: Thrombotic Microangiopathy”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 68 (6): e33–e34. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.10.006. PMID 27884283.
  62. Jayakody Arachchillage D, Greaves M (2014). “The chequered history of the antiphospholipid syndrome”. Br J Haematol. 165 (5): 609–17. doi:10.1111/bjh.12848. PMID 24684307.
  63. Jayakody Arachchillage D, Greaves M (2014). “The chequered history of the antiphospholipid syndrome”. Br J Haematol. 165 (5): 609–17. doi:10.1111/bjh.12848. PMID 24684307.
  64. Popa A, Voinea L, Pop M, Stana D, Dascalu AM, Alexandrescu C; et al. (2008). “[Primary antiphospholipid syndrome]”. Oftalmologia. 52 (1): 13–7. PMID 18714484.

Template:WH

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Ali Poyan Mehr, M.D. [2] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Olufunmilola Olubukola M.D.[3]

Overview

In the United States, prevalence of diabetic nephropathy (DN) has increased from 7.4% to 9.6% within a 20 years period (1988 to 2008), and this trend will likely continue due to the increasing incidence of diabetes in the American populace [1]. Studies by de Boer et al showed that DN accounts for 44% of new ESRD cases with 6% attributed to type 1 DM, 38% attributed to type 2 DM, and a projected increase of 3 million cases over the course of 20 years[1]. This increased incidence and prevalence of DN is notably greater among African Americans, Asians, and Native Americans than it is among Caucasians.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Prevalence

  • It is estimated that half of the diabetic patients will develop diabetic nephropathy after 20 years of the onset of the disease.
  • Diabetic nephropathy is the most common etiology of nephropathy and dialysis in the Western world.[2]
  • The worldwide burden of diabetic nephropathy seems to be on the rise, with an incidence rising by 150% per one decade in USA, Europe, and Japan and a prevalence increasing from 6.4% in 2010 and estimated to reach 7.7% in 2030.[3][4]
  • Costs due to diabetic nephropathy reach as high as 30-40 billion USD annually in the USA only.[5][6]
  • The burden of diabetic nephropathy from type II diabetes is far more significant than that of type I diabetes.[7]
  • Advanced age in type 2 diabetes and early diagnosis in type 1 diabetes are associated with higher risk of DN.[8][9]

Sex

  • Diabetic nephropathy has no sex predilection.

Age

  • Most of the cases of diabetic nephropathy develop after 10 years of the diagnosis with most of the cases are diagnosed between 10 and 20 years after the onset of the disease.
  • Diabetic nephropathy tends to occur in elderly patients with type 2 DM who have the disease for a long period of time.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 de Boer IH, Rue TC, Hall YN, Heagerty PJ, Weiss NS, Himmelfarb J (2011). “Temporal trends in the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease in the United States”. JAMA. 305 (24): 2532–9. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.861. PMC 3731378. PMID 21693741.
  2. Gray SP, Cooper ME (2011). “Diabetic nephropathy in 2010: Alleviating the burden of diabetic nephropathy”. Nat Rev Nephrol. 7 (2): 71–3. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2010.176. PMID 21278716.
  3. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ (2010). “Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030”. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 87 (1): 4–14. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007. PMID 19896746.
  4. Mallick NP, Jones E, Selwood N (1995). “The European (European Dialysis and Transplantation Association-European Renal Association) Registry”. Am J Kidney Dis. 25 (1): 176–87. PMID 7810523.
  5. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Chavers B, Gilbertson D, Herzog C, Johansen K; et al. (2012). United States Renal Data System 2011 Annual Data Report: Atlas of chronic kidney disease & end-stage renal disease in the United States”. Am J Kidney Dis. 59 (1 Suppl 1): A7, e1–420. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.015. PMID 22177944.
  6. Trivedi HS, Pang MM, Campbell A, Saab P (2002). “Slowing the progression of chronic renal failure: economic benefits and patients’ perspectives”. Am J Kidney Dis. 39 (4): 721–9. doi:10.1053/ajkd.2002.31990. PMID 11920337.
  7. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J (2001). “Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic”. Nature. 414 (6865): 782–7. doi:10.1038/414782a. PMID 11742409.
  8. Gall MA, Hougaard P, Borch-Johnsen K, Parving HH (1997). “Risk factors for development of incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: prospective, observational study”. BMJ. 314 (7083): 783–8. PMC 2126209. PMID 9080995.
  9. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ, Brazy PC (1999). “The 10-year incidence of renal insufficiency in people with type 1 diabetes”. Diabetes Care. 22 (5): 743–51. PMID 10332675.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Dima Nimri, M.D. [2]

Overview

Risk factors of diabetic nephropathy can be modifiable such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking or non-modifiable such as advanced age and positive family history.

Risk Factors

Risk factors of diabetic nephropathy can be subcategorized into modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors:

Modifiable Risk Factors

Modifiable risk factors include:[1][2][3][4]

Non-modifiable Risk Factors

Non-modifiable risk factors include:[1][2][3][4]

  • Age: advanced age is a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy.
  • Race: African Americans, Native Americans and Hispanics are at higher risk of developing diabetic nephropathy.
  • Family history: patients with a family history of diabetic nephropathy are more likely to develop diabetic nephropathy themselves.
  • Genetic profile: genetic variants in ACE, ALR2, APOC1, APOE, EPO, eNOS, HSPG2, VEGF, FRMD3, CARS, UNC13B, CPVL/CHN2, and GREM1 have been implicated in the development of diabetic nephropathy.
  • Obesity: obesity is associated with higher incidence of diabetic nephropathy.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Kasper, Dennis (2015). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0071802150.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lim A (2014). “Diabetic nephropathy – complications and treatment”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 7: 361–81. doi:10.2147/IJNRD.S40172. PMC 4206379. PMID 25342915. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  3. 3.0 3.1 Tziomalos K, Athyros VG (2015). “Diabetic Nephropathy: New Risk Factors and Improvements in Diagnosis”. Rev Diabet Stud. 12 (1–2): 110–8. doi:10.1900/RDS.2015.12.110. PMID 26676664.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Nathan DM (1993). “Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus”. N. Engl. J. Med. 328 (23): 1676–85. doi:10.1056/NEJM199306103282306. PMID 8487827.

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aarti Narayan, M.B.B.S [2], Dima Nimri, M.D. [3]

Overview

Microalbuminuria is an excellent tool for the early detection of diabetic nephropathy.

Screening

  • Screening for nephropathy in diabetes should begin at the time of diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus[1] and after 5 years of the diagnosis of type I diabetes mellitus.[2]
  • Screening for albuminuria is done with a routine dipstick urinalysis. However, routine dipsticks do not rule out microalbuminuria. Hence, if the test is positive, a 24-hour urine sample for quantifying the amount of protein should be done and if the test is negative, a radioimmunoassay for albumin should be done and repeated every year if the initial result is negative.
  • The albumin to creatinine ratio should also be measured in a morning urine sample, a 24-hour or an overnight sample.
    • In the case of an abnormal urine albumin to creatinine ratio (more than 30 mg/ g Cr), test should be repeated once or twice over a period of few months for consistency of the results.
  • Estimated GFR (eGFR) is often calculated at the time of screening to document and/or stage chronic kidney disease (CKD).
  • If retinopathy is present along with albuminuria, the albuminuria is highly attributed to diabetic nephropathy.[1][2]
  • New genetic markers are being studied for diabetic nephropathy. These markers are being determined in order to facilitate an early identification and management of patients at a high risk of developing diabetic nephropathy.[2]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Remuzzi G, Schieppati A, Ruggenenti P (2002). “Clinical practice. Nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes”. N. Engl. J. Med. 346 (15): 1145–51. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp011773. PMID 11948275.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Lim A (2014). “Diabetic nephropathy – complications and treatment”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 7: 361–81. doi:10.2147/IJNRD.S40172. PMC 4206379. PMID 25342915. Vancouver style error: initials (help)

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aarti Narayan, M.B.B.S [2], Dima Nimri, M.D. [3]

Overview

If left untreated, diabetic nephropathy (DN) can progress to develop ESRD (end stage renal disease). Diabetic nephropathy can be complicated with coronary artery disease, hypertension, and type IV RTA, The prognosis of DN is bad with continued disease progression even after proper glycemic control.

Natural History

Complications

Possible complications include:[1]

Prognosis

Diabetic nephropathy has become the most common cause of ESRD in most countries due to the increased prevalence of diabetes epidemic.[3] Even with medical interventions to slow the progression of microalbuminuria, diabetic nephropathy can progress to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Kasper, Dennis (2015). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0071802150.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Nathan DM (1993). “Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus”. N. Engl. J. Med. 328 (23): 1676–85. doi:10.1056/NEJM199306103282306. PMID 8487827.
  3. Lim A (2014). “Diabetic nephropathy – complications and treatment”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 7: 361–81. doi:10.2147/IJNRD.S40172. PMC 4206379. PMID 25342915. Vancouver style error: initials (help)


Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

External links
  • Diabetic nephropathy. MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia. Text from this public domain article was partially used here.

Template:Nephrology

Template:Diabetes

de:Diabetische Nephropathie he:סוכרת כלייתית sr:Дијабетесна нефропатија fi:Diabeettinen nefropatia sv:Diabetesnefropati

Template:WH Template:WS

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH