Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Esthesioneuroblastoma

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Synonyms and keywords: Olfactory neuroblastoma; Aesthesioneuroblastoma

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

Esthesioneuroblastoma, also known as olfactory neuroblastoma, is a rare form of cancer involving nasal cavity and believed to arise from the olfactory epithelium. It can cause loss of vision, and taste.[1] Esthesioneuroblastomas are undifferentiated tumors of neuroectodermal origin derived from the olfactory epithelium. The tumor cells are mitotically active and are the precursor cells that develop into sustentacular and neuronal cells. They usually present as a soft tissue mass in the superior olfactory recess involving the anterior and middle ethmoid air-cells on one side and extending through the cribriform plate into the anterior cranial fossa.[2] Based on the duration of symptoms, esthesioneuroblastoma may be classified into two subtypes neuroblastoma proper and neuroendocrine carcinomas.[3] Genes involved in the pathogenesis of esthesioneuroblastoma include chromosomal gains in 7q11 and 20q and deletions in 2q, 5q, 6p, 6q, and 18q. On gross pathology, soft and hemorrhagic, polypoid appearance, and rich and fragile vascular supply of the tumor are characteristic findings of esthesioneuroblastoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, arrangements of cells into rosettes or pseudorosettes are characteristic findings of esthesioneuroblastoma.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The incidence of esthesioneuroblastoma is approximately 0.4 per 100,000 individuals worldwide. Esthesioneuroblastoma can present in a wide range of age groups; however, it is mostly noted in a bimodal distribution, occurring most frequently in the second and sixth decades of life. There is no racial predilection to the esthesioneuroblastoma.[11][4] There are no established risk factors for esthesioneuroblastoma. If left untreated, 10%-62% of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma may progress to develop metastasis. Common complications of esthesioneuroblastoma include tumor recurrence and metastasis. These tumors often display varying biologic activity ranging from indolent growth, with patient survival exceeding 20 years, to a highly aggressive neoplasm capable of rapid widespread metastasis, with survival limited to a few months. The five-year mortality rate of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma is approximately 56% and 20% for grade I and II and grade III and IV tumors, respectively. The ten-year mortality rate of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma is approximately 67% and 34% for grade I and II and grade III and IV tumors, respectively.[12][11] Symptoms of esthesioneuroblastoma include nasal obstruction, epistaxis, ear pain, otitis media, hyposmia, nasal discharge, facial pain, changes in vision, lacrimation, facial numbness, and anosmia.[13][14][15][16][17] Common physical examination findings of esthesioneuroblastoma include reddish-gray, polypoid mass located in the upper nasal fossa, epistaxis, nasal discharge, nasal pain, facial swelling, trismus, proptosis, diplopia, anosmia, serous otitis media, cervical lymphadenopathy, retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy, decreased visual acuity, extraocular movement paralysis, altered mental status, and frontal headaches. Biopsy may be helpful in the diagnosis of esthesioneuroblastoma. Findings on biopsy diagnostic of esthesioneuroblastoma include small, round-to-oval cells with coarsely granular chromatin, prominent nuclear membranes, multiple small nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm with pseudorosette or occasional Homer-Wright rosettes separated by fibrous septa. Calcification and necrosis are sometimes seen, and mitotic figures are rare.[18] On head and neck CT, esthesioneuroblastoma is characterized by soft tissue attenuation, with relatively homogenous enhancement.[4] Head and neck MRI scan is diagnostic of esthesioneuroblastoma. On head and neck MRI, esthesioneuroblastoma is characterized by heterogenous intermediate signal on T1 and T2weighted MRI and variable enhancement on T1 contrast with gadolinium.[4] The predominant therapy for esthesioneuroblastoma is surgical resection followed by postoperative irradiation. Adjunctive radiation/chemotherapy may be required. The optimal therapy for esthesioneuroblastoma depends on the stage at diagnosis and regional or distant metastasis.[13][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]

Historical Perspective

Esthesioneuroblastoma was first discovered by Berger and Luc, in 1924.[27]

Classification

Based on the duration of symptoms, esthesioneuroblastoma may be classified into two subtypes neuroblastoma proper and neuroendocrine carcinomas.[3]

Pathophysiology

Genes involved in the pathogenesis of esthesioneuroblastoma include chromosomal gains in 7q11 and 20q and deletions in 2q, 5q, 6p, 6q, and 18q. On gross pathology, soft and hemorrhagic, polypoid appearance, and rich and fragile vascular supply of the tumor are characteristic findings of esthesioneuroblastoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, arrangements of cells into rosettes or pseudorosettes are characteristic findings of esthesioneuroblastoma.[4][5][28][7][8][9][10]

Causes

Genes involved in the pathogenesis of esthesioneuroblastoma include chromosomal gains in 7q11 and 20q and deletions in 2q, 5q, 6p, 6q, and 18q.[8][9][10]

Differential Diagnosis

Esthesioneuroblastoma must be differentiated from other tumors with similar histological appearance, such as lymphoma, Ewing sarcoma, melanoma, olfactory/ other (rhabdomyosarcoma or Merkel cell carcinoma), neuroblastoma, and small cell carcinoma. Distinguishing esthesioneuroblastomas from the other tumors is of paramount importance because the tumors respond differently to various treatment modalities.[4][29]

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence of esthesioneuroblastoma is approximately 0.4 per 100,000 individuals worldwide. Esthesioneuroblastoma can present in a wide range of age groups; however, it is mostly noted in a bimodal distribution, occurring most frequently in the second and sixth decades of life. There is no racial predilection to the esthesioneuroblastoma.[11][4]

Risk Factors

There are no established risk factors for esthesioneuroblastoma.

Screening

According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force, screening for esthesioneuroblastoma is not recommended.[30]

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

If left untreated, 10%-62% of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma may progress to develop metastasis. Common complications of esthesioneuroblastoma include tumor recurrence and metastasis. These tumors often display varying biologic activity ranging from indolent growth, with patient survival exceeding 20 years, to a highly aggressive neoplasm capable of rapid widespread metastasis, with survival limited to a few months. The five-year mortality rate of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma is approximately 56% and 20% for grade I and II and grade III and IV tumors, respectively. The ten-year mortality rate of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma is approximately 67% and 34% for grade I and II and grade III and IV tumors, respectively.[31][11]

Staging

According to a staging system by Kadish, there are four stages of esthesioneuroblastoma based upon the extent of the primary tumor and lymph node or distant metastases. In 1992, Dulguerov and Calceterra proposed a classification based on the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) system, predicted on CT and MRI findings that can be identified before treatment.[32][33][34]

History and Symptoms

Symptoms of esthesioneuroblastoma include nasal obstruction, epistaxis, ear pain, otitis media, hyposmia, nasal discharge, facial pain, changes in vision, lacrimation, facial numbness, and anosmia.[13][14][15][16][17]

Physical Examination

Common physical examination findings of esthesioneuroblastoma include reddish-gray, polypoid mass located in the upper nasal fossa, epistaxis, nasal discharge, nasal pain, facial swelling, trismus, proptosis, diplopia, anosmia, serous otitis media, cervical lymphadenopathy, retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy, decreased visual acuity, extraocular movement paralysis, altered mental status, and frontal headaches.

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of [disease name] include hypercalcemia, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH), hyponatremia, and neurological paraneoplastic syndromes.

CT

On head and neck CT, esthesioneuroblastoma is characterized by soft tissue attenuation, with relatively homogenous enhancement.[4]

MRI

Head and neck MRI scan is diagnostic of esthesioneuroblastoma. On head and neck MRI, esthesioneuroblastoma is characterized by heterogenous intermediate signal on T1 and T2 weighted MRI and variable enhancement on T1 contrast with gadolinium.[4]

Other Imaging Studies

Other imaging studies for esthesioneuroblastoma include angiography/digital subtraction angiography, nuclear medicine, nasal endoscopy, and scintigraphy.[4]

Other Diagnostic Studies

Biopsy may be helpful in the diagnosis of esthesioneuroblastoma. Findings on biopsy diagnostic of esthesioneuroblastoma include small, round-to-oval cells with coarsely granular chromatin, prominent nuclear membranes, multiple small nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm with pseudorosette or occasional Homer-Wright rosettes separated by fibrous septa. Calcification and necrosis are sometimes seen, and mitotic figures are rare.[18]

Medical Therapy

The predominant therapy for esthesioneuroblastoma is surgical resection followed by postoperative irradiation. Adjunctive radiation/chemotherapy may be required. The optimal therapy for esthesioneuroblastoma depends on the stage at diagnosis and regional or distant metastasis.[13][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]

Surgery

Surgery followed by postoperative irradiation is the mainstay of treatment for esthesioneuroblastoma.[21]

Primary Prevention

There are no primary preventive measures available for esthesioneuroblastoma.

Secondary Prevention

Secondary prevention strategies following esthesioneuroblastoma include nasal irrigation with sterile isotonic sodium chloride begins within a few days after packing removal, removal of nasal crusting should be performed regularly during initial postoperative visits, and craniotomy sutures are removed 7-10 days after surgery.

References

  1. Esthesioneuroblastoma. Wikipedia(2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esthesioneuroblastoma Accessed on January 26, 2016
  2. Barnes, Leon. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005. Print.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Min KW (1995). “Usefulness of electron microscopy in the diagnosis of “small” round cell tumors of the sinonasal region”. Ultrastruct Pathol. 19 (5): 347–63. PMID 7483011.
  4. 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 Esthesioneuroblastoma. Radiopedia(2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/olfactory-neuroblastoma Accessed on January 25, 2016
  5. 5.0 5.1 Esthesioneuroblastoma. Libre pathology(2015) http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Olfactory_neuroblastoma Accessed on January 25, 2015
  6. Hyams, V. J. (1988). Tumors of the upper respiratory tract and ear. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Hirose T, Scheithauer BW, Lopes MB, Gerber HA, Altermatt HJ, Harner SG; et al. (1995). “Olfactory neuroblastoma. An immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and flow cytometric study”. Cancer. 76 (1): 4–19. PMID 8630875.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Guled M, Myllykangas S, Frierson HF, Mills SE, Knuutila S, Stelow EB (2008). “Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of olfactory neuroblastoma”. Mod Pathol. 21 (6): 770–8. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2008.57. PMID 18408657.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Mhawech P, Berczy M, Assaly M, Herrmann F, Bouzourene H, Allal AS; et al. (2004). “Human achaete-scute homologue (hASH1) mRNA level as a diagnostic marker to distinguish esthesioneuroblastoma from poorly differentiated tumors arising in the sinonasal tract”. Am J Clin Pathol. 122 (1): 100–5. doi:10.1309/QD0K-9Q1J-BH6B-5GQQ. PMID 15272537.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Carney ME, O’Reilly RC, Sholevar B, Buiakova OI, Lowry LD, Keane WM; et al. (1995). “Expression of the human Achaete-scute 1 gene in olfactory neuroblastoma (esthesioneuroblastoma)”. J Neurooncol. 26 (1): 35–43. PMID 8583243.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Shirzadi, Ali S.; Drazin, Doniel G.; Strickland, Allison S.; Bannykh, Serguei I.; Johnson, J. Patrick (2013). “Vertebral Column Metastases from an Esthesioneuroblastoma: Chemotherapy, Radiation, and Resection for Recurrence with 15-Year Followup”. Case Reports in Surgery. 2013: 1–8. doi:10.1155/2013/107315. ISSN 2090-6900.
  12. Kane, Ari J., et al. “Posttreatment prognosis of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma: clinical article.” Journal of neurosurgery 113.2 (2010): 340-351.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Ward PD, Heth JA, Thompson BG, Marentette LJ (2009). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: Results and Outcomes of a Single Institution’s Experience”. Skull Base. 19 (2): 133–40. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1096195. PMC 2671304. PMID 19721769.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Koo BK, An JH, Jeon KH, Choi SH, Cho YM, Jang HC; et al. (2008). “Two cases of ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome with olfactory neuroblastoma and literature review”. Endocr J. 55 (3): 469–75. PMID 18469486.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Sharma S, Lasheen W, Walsh D (2008). “Paraneoplastic refractory hypercalcemia due to advanced metastatic esthesioneuroblastoma”. Rhinology. 46 (2): 153–5. PMID 18575019.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Gabbay U, Leider-Trejo L, Marshak G, Gabbay M, Fliss DM (2013). “A case and a series of published cases of esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) in which long-standing paraneoplastic SIADH had preceded ENB diagnosis”. Ear Nose Throat J. 92 (10–11): E6. PMID 24170477.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Kunc M, Gabrych A, Czapiewski P, Sworczak K (2015). “Paraneoplastic syndromes in olfactory neuroblastoma”. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 19 (1): 6–16. doi:10.5114/wo.2015.46283. PMC 4507891. PMID 26199564.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Kane AJ, Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Aranda D, Mills SA, Buencamino R; et al. (2010). “Posttreatment prognosis of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma”. J Neurosurg. 113 (2): 340–51. doi:10.3171/2010.2.JNS091897. PMID 20345216.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Diaz EM, Johnigan RH, Pero C, El-Naggar AK, Roberts DB, Barker JL; et al. (2005). “Olfactory neuroblastoma: the 22-year experience at one comprehensive cancer center”. Head Neck. 27 (2): 138–49. doi:10.1002/hed.20127. PMID 15654688.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Bachar G, Goldstein DP, Shah M, Tandon A, Ringash J, Pond G; et al. (2008). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: The Princess Margaret Hospital experience”. Head Neck. 30 (12): 1607–14. doi:10.1002/hed.20920. PMID 18798301.
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 Dulguerov P, Allal AS, Calcaterra TC (2001). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: a meta-analysis and review”. Lancet Oncol. 2 (11): 683–90. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00558-7. PMID 11902539.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Nichols AC, Chan AW, Curry WT, Barker FG, Deschler DG, Lin DT (2008). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: the massachusetts eye and ear infirmary and massachusetts general hospital experience with craniofacial resection, proton beam radiation, and chemotherapy”. Skull Base. 18 (5): 327–37. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1076098. PMC 2637063. PMID 19240832.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Lund VJ, Howard D, Wei W, Spittle M (2003). “Olfactory neuroblastoma: past, present, and future?”. Laryngoscope. 113 (3): 502–7. doi:10.1097/00005537-200303000-00020. PMID 12616204.
  24. 24.0 24.1 Theilgaard SA, Buchwald C, Ingeholm P, Kornum Larsen S, Eriksen JG, Sand Hansen H (2003). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: a Danish demographic study of 40 patients registered between 1978 and 2000”. Acta Otolaryngol. 123 (3): 433–9. PMID 12737303.
  25. 25.0 25.1 Ozsahin M, Gruber G, Olszyk O, Karakoyun-Celik O, Pehlivan B, Azria D; et al. (2010). “Outcome and prognostic factors in olfactory neuroblastoma: a rare cancer network study”. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 78 (4): 992–7. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.019. PMID 20231062.
  26. 26.0 26.1 Foote RL, Morita A, Ebersold MJ, Olsen KD, Lewis JE, Quast LM; et al. (1993). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: the role of adjuvant radiation therapy”. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 27 (4): 835–42. PMID 8244813.
  27. Broich G, Pagliari A, Ottaviani F (1997). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: a general review of the cases published since the discovery of the tumour in 1924”. Anticancer Res. 17 (4A): 2683–706. PMID 9252701.
  28. Hyams, V. J. (1988). Tumors of the upper respiratory tract and ear. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.
  29. Argani P, Perez-Ordoñez B, Xiao H, Caruana SM, Huvos AG, Ladanyi M (1998). “Olfactory neuroblastoma is not related to the Ewing family of tumors: absence of EWS/FLI1 gene fusion and MIC2 expression”. Am J Surg Pathol. 22 (4): 391–8. PMID 9580174.
  30. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Search?s=esthesioneuroblastoma Accessed on December 26, 2016.
  31. Kane, Ari J., et al. “Posttreatment prognosis of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma: clinical article.” Journal of neurosurgery 113.2 (2010): 340-351.
  32. Kadish S, Goodman M, Wang CC (1976). “Olfactory neuroblastoma. A clinical analysis of 17 cases”. Cancer. 37 (3): 1571–6. PMID 1260676.
  33. Morita A, Ebersold MJ, Olsen KD, Foote RL, Lewis JE, Quast LM (1993). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: prognosis and management”. Neurosurgery. 32 (5): 706–14, discussion 714-5. PMID 8492845.
  34. Dulguerov P, Calcaterra T (1992). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: the UCLA experience 1970-1990”. Laryngoscope. 102 (8): 843–9. PMID 1495347.

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

Esthesioneuroblastoma was first discovered by Berger and Luc, in 1924.[1]

Historical Perspective

Esthesioneuroblastoma was first discovered in 1924 by Berger and Luc.[2][3] The disease was brought into prominence by the case of Chantal Sébire, who was suffering from the disease and ended her life after being denied euthanasia.[4]

References

  1. Broich G, Pagliari A, Ottaviani F (1997). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: a general review of the cases published since the discovery of the tumour in 1924”. Anticancer Res. 17 (4A): 2683–706. PMID 9252701.
  2. “Esthesioneuroblastoma”. Retrieved 2008-03-22.
  3. Berger L, Luc G, Richard D. L’esthésioneuroépithéliome olfactif. Bull Assoc Franç Étude Cancer 1924;13:410-421.
  4. Tumour woman’s death not natural BBC 21 March 2008

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

Based on the duration of symptoms, esthesioneuroblastoma may be classified into two subtypes: neuroblastoma proper and neuroendocrine carcinomas.[1]

Classification

  • Neuroblastoma proper
    • Neuroblastoma proper has a histologic presentation similar to that of peripheral neuroblastomas of childhood.
    • Esthesioneuroblastoma is composed of sheets of poorly demarcated groups of cells separated by fine connective tissue trabeculae.
    • The cells are small and typically show no mitotic activity between the cells.
    • Rosettes of the Homer-Wright type are present.
    • On electronic microscopy, there is the presence of a dendritic cytoplasmic process with accumulations of small core granules within the process.
    • Neuroblastomas proper contain fibrillary material.
  • Neuroendocrine carcinomas
    • Neuroendocrine carcinoma is admixture with glands.
    • A neurofibrillary component is absent and the growth pattern is that of solid nests without rosettes.
    • Dense core granules similar to those of neuroblastomas are present in the cytoplasm and cytoplasmic extensions.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

Genetic mutations involved in the pathogenesis of esthesioneuroblastoma include chromosomal gains in 7q11 and 20q and deletions in 2q, 5q, 6p, 6q, and 18q. On gross pathology, a soft, hemorrhagic, polypoid appearance, and rich, fragile vascular supply are characteristic findings of esthesioneuroblastoma. On microscopic histopathological analysis, arrangements of cells into rosettes or pseudorosettes are characteristic findings of esthesioneuroblastoma.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

Pathophysiology

Gross Pathology

  • On gross examination, biopsy material from olfactory neuroblastoma is soft and hemorrhagic.
  • Resection specimens may show a polypoid appearance.
  • The vascular supply of the tumor is rich and fragile, accounting for the hemorrhagic gross appearance.

Microscopic Pathology

  • Olfactory neuroblastomas are of neural crest cell origin. They are multilobulated pink-grey tumors.
  • On microscopic histopathologic analysis, there is variable differentiation, from well formed neural tissue to undifferentiated neuroblasts with pseudorosette formation.[1][2]
  • Microscopically, the tumor grows beneath the surface respiratory epithelium and may produce focal ulceration.
  • Esthesioneuroblastomas (ENBs) can display various histologic presentations.
    • The hallmark of well-differentiated esthesioneuroblastoma is the arrangement of cells into rosettes or pseudorosettes.
    • True rosettes (Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes) are a ring of columnar cells circumscribing a central oval-to-round space. They appear clear on traditional pathologic sections.
    • Pseudorosettes (Homer-Wright rosettes) are characterized by a looser arrangement and the presence of fibrillary material within the lumen.
  • In low-grade or well-differentiated lesions, the growth pattern is lobulated with transitions into sheets or discrete nests of tumor cells, which are small and round with high nuclear cytoplasmic ratios.[4][8]
  • In well-differentiated tumors, the nuclei show uniform chromatin distribution with small unremarkable nucleoli. The nuclei become progressively more pleomorphic, with prominent nucleoli and coarse chromatin clumping, with increasing tumor grade. The stroma in well-differentiated tumors is distinctly fibrillary, reflecting the neuronal processes made by the tumor cells. This stroma decreases in quantity as the tumor becomes less well-differentiated. Mitoses and areas of necrosis also become more frequent with increasing tumor grade.
  • In one-half of olfactory neuroblastomas, Homer Wright pseudorosettes, which are composed of tumor cells surrounding a center of pink fibrillary material are seen.
  • In higher grade tumors, true (Flexner type) rosettes, composed of tumor cells surrounding a central lumen are seen.
  • Vascular or lymphatic invasion, necrosis, and dystrophic calcification are more common with increasing tumor grade.
  • A few admixed ganglion cells may be present, on rare instances.
  • Electron microscopy of olfactory neuroblastomas demonstrates numerous axonal-type cytoplasmic processes, which contain neurotubules, neurofilaments, and dense-core neurosecretory granules (100 to 200 nm in diameter). The S100 immunoreactivity corresponds to Schwann cells enveloping axonal processes and cell bodies.[4][8]

Genetics

  • A tool called array comparative genomic hybridization was applied to the analysis of esthesioneuroblastomas. Although many alterations were identified by this study, chromosomal gains in 7q11 and 20q and deletions in 2q, 5q, 6p, 6q, and 18q have been confirmed by at least two other studies.
  • Although still investigational, the demonstration of human achaete-scute homologue HASH1 gene expression could become the diagnostic procedure of choice. The HASH1 gene is expressed in immature olfactory cells and is involved in olfactory neuronal differentiation; therefore, it could be useful in distinguishing esthesioneuroblastoma from other poorly differentiated small blue cell tumors.[5][6][7]


The Hyams histologic grading system grades tumors from I to IV based upon pathologic features such as mitotic activity and necrosis.[8]

Grade Features
Grade I
  • Grade I tumors are characterized by a prominent fibrillary matrix, tumor cells with uniform nuclei, absent mitotic activity, and necrosis.
Grade II
  • Grade II tumors have some fibrillary matrix and exhibit moderate nuclear pleomorphism with some mitotic activity. There is no necrosis.
Grade III
  • Grade III tumors have minimal fibrillary matrix and Flexner type rosettes are present. There is more prominent mitotic activity and nuclear pleomorphism, and some necrosis may be seen.
Grade IV
  • Grade IV tumors have no fibrillary matrix or rosettes and show marked nuclear pleomorphism and increased mitotic activity with frequent necrosis.

The various features of histopathological grading according to Hyams is shown below in a tabular form:[8]

Grade Mitotic Index Nuclear Polymorphism Fibrillary Matrix Rosettes Necrosis Lobular Architecture Preservation
Grade I

Zero

None

Prominent

Homer Wright Rosettes

None

+

Grade II

Low

Low

Present

Homer Wright Rosettes

None

+

Grade III

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes

Rare

+/-

Grade IV

High

High

Absent

None

Frequent

+/-

Associated Conditions

  • Esthesioneuroblastoma may be associated with Trisomy 8.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Esthesioneuroblastoma. Radiopedia(2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/olfactory-neuroblastoma Accessed on January 25, 2016
  2. 2.0 2.1 Esthesioneuroblastoma. Libre pathology(2015) http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Olfactory_neuroblastoma Accessed on January 25, 2015
  3. Hyams, V. J. (1988). Tumors of the upper respiratory tract and ear. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Hirose T, Scheithauer BW, Lopes MB, Gerber HA, Altermatt HJ, Harner SG; et al. (1995). “Olfactory neuroblastoma. An immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and flow cytometric study”. Cancer. 76 (1): 4–19. PMID 8630875.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Guled M, Myllykangas S, Frierson HF, Mills SE, Knuutila S, Stelow EB (2008). “Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of olfactory neuroblastoma”. Mod Pathol. 21 (6): 770–8. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2008.57. PMID 18408657.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Mhawech P, Berczy M, Assaly M, Herrmann F, Bouzourene H, Allal AS; et al. (2004). “Human achaete-scute homologue (hASH1) mRNA level as a diagnostic marker to distinguish esthesioneuroblastoma from poorly differentiated tumors arising in the sinonasal tract”. Am J Clin Pathol. 122 (1): 100–5. doi:10.1309/QD0K-9Q1J-BH6B-5GQQ. PMID 15272537.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Carney ME, O’Reilly RC, Sholevar B, Buiakova OI, Lowry LD, Keane WM; et al. (1995). “Expression of the human Achaete-scute 1 gene in olfactory neuroblastoma (esthesioneuroblastoma)”. J Neurooncol. 26 (1): 35–43. PMID 8583243.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Hyams, V. J. (1988). Tumors of the upper respiratory tract and ear. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

Genes involved in the pathogenesis of esthesioneuroblastoma include chromosomal gains in 7q11 and 20q and deletions in 2q, 5q, 6p, 6q, and 18q.[1][2][3]

Causes

  • A tool called array comparative genomic hybridization was applied to the analysis of esthesioneuroblastomass. Although many alterations were identified by this study, chromosomal gains in 7q11 and 20q and deletions in 2q, 5q, 6p, 6q, and 18q have been confirmed by at least two other studies.
  • Although still investigational, the demonstration of human achaete-scute homologue HASH1 gene expression, could become the diagnostic procedure of choice. The HASH1 gene is expressed in immature olfactory cells and is involved in olfactory neuronal differentiation; therefore, it could be useful in distinguishing esthesioneuroblastoma from other poorly differentiated small blue cell tumors.[1][2][3]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Guled M, Myllykangas S, Frierson HF, Mills SE, Knuutila S, Stelow EB (2008). “Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of olfactory neuroblastoma”. Mod Pathol. 21 (6): 770–8. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2008.57. PMID 18408657.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Mhawech P, Berczy M, Assaly M, Herrmann F, Bouzourene H, Allal AS; et al. (2004). “Human achaete-scute homologue (hASH1) mRNA level as a diagnostic marker to distinguish esthesioneuroblastoma from poorly differentiated tumors arising in the sinonasal tract”. Am J Clin Pathol. 122 (1): 100–5. doi:10.1309/QD0K-9Q1J-BH6B-5GQQ. PMID 15272537.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Carney ME, O’Reilly RC, Sholevar B, Buiakova OI, Lowry LD, Keane WM; et al. (1995). “Expression of the human Achaete-scute 1 gene in olfactory neuroblastoma (esthesioneuroblastoma)”. J Neurooncol. 26 (1): 35–43. PMID 8583243.

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Esthesioneuroblastoma from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

Esthesioneuroblastoma must be differentiated from other tumors with similar histological appearance, such as lymphoma, Ewing sarcoma, melanoma, rhabdomyosarcoma or Merkel cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma. Distinguishing esthesioneuroblastomas from the other tumors is of paramount importance because the tumors respond differently to various treatment modalities.[1][2]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of esthesioneuroblastoma includes the following:[1][2]


The outcome of following diseases with various immunohistochemical tests is shown below in a tabular form:

Disease Immunohistochemical Tests
Esthesioneuroblastoma
  • Esthesioneuroblastomas stain positive for neuron-specific enolase and/or S-100 protein,
  • The stain is negative for desmin, cytokeratin, vimentin, actin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, UMB 45, and the common leukocytic antigen.
  • For difficult cases, electron microscopy can be useful.
  • Common features are small, round neuroepithelial cells arranged in rosette or pseudorosette patterns, separated by fibrous elements. The rosettes consist of a central space ringed by columnar cells with radially oriented nuclei.
Lymphoma
  • Lymphoma can be excluded when the majority of tumor cells are negative for CD45 (the remaining positive cells demonstrate no atypical immunophenotype).
Ewing sarcoma
  • Ewing sarcoma is positive for MIC2/CD99 gene products that result from an 11;22 translocation.
Melanoma
  • Melanoma can be identified using a combination of immunohistochemical markers: HMB-45, MART-1/Melan-A, and S-100.
  • S-100 is expressed in more than 95% of melanomas.
Rhabdomyosarcoma
  • Rhabdomyosarcoma displays a loss of chromosome 11 and stains positive for desmin (expressed in 95%), muscle-specific actin, and myoglobin.
Merkel cell carcinoma
  • Merkel cell carcinoma stains positively for low-molecular-weight cytokeratin 20 and NSE.
Neuroblastoma
  • Neuroblastoma often stains positive for NSE, synaptophysin, Leu7, and neurofilament protein.
  • Elevated serum catecholamines are also suggestive of neuroblastoma.
Small cell carcinomas
  • Small cell carcinomas stain positively for chromogranin, NSE, and synaptophysin (presynaptic nerve cell vesicles). Most small cell carcinomas are positive for TTF-1.
Disease History/demography Symptoms Physical examination Diagnosis
Palpable mass Pain Others Mass tenderness Others Genetics Imaging Histology
Rhabdomyosarcoma[3][4][5][6]
  • Most common soft tissue cancer among children and adolescents
  • The third most common extracranial solid tumors
  • Two-third of all cases happen under 6 years old
+ + +/-

Mutations in:

CT scan:

Ultrasound:

MRI:

Wilms tumor[7][8][9][10][11] + + +/- Present mutations of: Ultrasound:

CT scan:

Ewing sarcoma[12][13][14][15] + + + Radiographic of region:

CT scan:

MRI:

Pediatric neuroblastoma [16][17][18][19]

Age distribution:

  • < 1 years old ( 40%)
  • 1-2 years old (35%)
  • > 2 years old (25%)

+ (Abdominal)

+

+(Abdominal)

CT scan:

MRI:

Pediatric pheochromocytoma[20][21][22][23] +/- Genetic mutation in: Ultrasound:

CT scan:

MRI (in extra adrenal tumors):

  • T1:
    • Heterogenous enhancement
    • Hypointense
  • T2:
    • Hyperintense
  • T1 C+ (Gd):
    • Heterogenous enhancement

Positive stains for:

Pediatric osteosarcoma[24][25][26] + + + Radiography:

CT scan:

MRI:

Pediatric liposarcoma[27][28][29][30] + +/-
  • N/A
CT scan:

MRI:

Divided into following subtypes:

Common findings:

Pediatric acute myelocytic leukemia[31][32][33][34] +/- ( Abdominal mass, mediastinal mass) + (bone pain, joint pain) +/- Genetic translocations include:
  • t (8;21)
  • t (3;21)
  • t (15;17)
Radiography:

CT scan/ MRI:

Radionuclide imaging:

Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia[35][36]

+/-( Extramedullary mass in abdomen/ head/ neck)

+/- (Musculoskeletal pain) Chromosomal translocations:
  • t (9;22)
  • t (12;21)
  • t (5;14)
  • t (1;19)
Radiography:

Chest x ray:

Bone x ray:

Brain MRI:

Divided into 3 subgroups:

L1:

L2:

L3:

Pediatric non-hodgkin lymphoma[37][38][39] + + (Chest tenderness) Radiography:

CT scan:

Ultrasound:

Histology findings of non-hodgkin lymphoma depend on:

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Esthesioneuroblastoma. Radiopedia(2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/olfactory-neuroblastoma Accessed on January 25, 2016
  2. 2.0 2.1 Argani P, Perez-Ordoñez B, Xiao H, Caruana SM, Huvos AG, Ladanyi M (1998). “Olfactory neuroblastoma is not related to the Ewing family of tumors: absence of EWS/FLI1 gene fusion and MIC2 expression”. Am J Surg Pathol. 22 (4): 391–8. PMID 9580174.
  3. Egas-Bejar D, Huh WW (2014). “Rhabdomyosarcoma in adolescent and young adult patients: current perspectives”. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 5: 115–25. doi:10.2147/AHMT.S44582. PMC 4069040. PMID 24966711.
  4. Dasgupta R, Fuchs J, Rodeberg D (2016). “Rhabdomyosarcoma”. Semin Pediatr Surg. 25 (5): 276–283. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.09.011. PMID 27955730.
  5. Park K, van Rijn R, McHugh K (2008). “The role of radiology in paediatric soft tissue sarcomas”. Cancer Imaging. 8: 102–15. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0014. PMC 2365455. PMID 18442956.
  6. Shern JF, Yohe ME, Khan J (2015). “Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma”. Crit Rev Oncog. 20 (3–4): 227–43. PMC 5486973. PMID 26349418.
  7. Hartman DS, Sanders RC (April 1982). “Wilms’ tumor versus neuroblastoma: usefulness of ultrasound in differentiation”. J Ultrasound Med. 1 (3): 117–22. PMID 6152936.
  8. De Campo JF (1986). “Ultrasound of Wilms’ tumor”. Pediatr Radiol. 16 (1): 21–4. PMID 3003660.
  9. Cahan LD (1985). “Failure of encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis procedure in moyamoya disease”. Pediatr Neurosci. 12 (1): 58–62. PMID 4080660.
  10. Coppes MJ, Pritchard-Jones K (2000). “Principles of Wilms’ tumor biology”. Urol Clin North Am. 27 (3): 423–33, viii. PMID 10985142.
  11. Davidoff AM (2012). “Wilms tumor”. Adv Pediatr. 59 (1): 247–67. doi:10.1016/j.yapd.2012.04.001. PMC 3589819. PMID 22789581.
  12. Burchill SA (2003). “Ewing’s sarcoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of molecular abnormalities”. J Clin Pathol. 56 (2): 96–102. PMC 1769883. PMID 12560386.
  13. Maygarden SJ, Askin FB, Siegal GP, Gilula LA, Schoppe J, Foulkes M; et al. (1993). “Ewing sarcoma of bone in infants and toddlers. A clinicopathologic report from the Intergroup Ewing’s Study”. Cancer. 71 (6): 2109–18. PMID 8443760.
  14. Panicek DM, Gatsonis C, Rosenthal DI, Seeger LL, Huvos AG, Moore SG; et al. (1997). “CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group”. Radiology. 202 (1): 237–46. doi:10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988217. PMID 8988217.
  15. Grünewald TGP, Cidre-Aranaz F, Surdez D, Tomazou EM, de Álava E, Kovar H; et al. (2018). “Ewing sarcoma”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 4 (1): 5. doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0003-x. PMID 29977059.
  16. Lonergan GJ, Schwab CM, Suarez ES, Carlson CL (2002). “Neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma: radiologic-pathologic correlation”. Radiographics. 22 (4): 911–34. doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl15911. PMID 12110723.
  17. Golden CB, Feusner JH (2002). “Malignant abdominal masses in children: quick guide to evaluation and diagnosis”. Pediatr Clin North Am. 49 (6): 1369–92, viii. PMID 12580370.
  18. Angstman KB, Miser JS, Franz WB (1990). “Neuroblastoma”. Am Fam Physician. 41 (1): 238–44. PMID 2403727.
  19. Musarella MA, Chan HS, DeBoer G, Gallie BL (1984). “Ocular involvement in neuroblastoma: prognostic implications”. Ophthalmology. 91 (8): 936–40. PMID 6493702.
  20. Leung K, Stamm M, Raja A, Low G (2013). “Pheochromocytoma: the range of appearances on ultrasound, CT, MRI, and functional imaging”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 200 (2): 370–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9126. PMID 23345359.
  21. Stein PP, Black HR (1991). “A simplified diagnostic approach to pheochromocytoma. A review of the literature and report of one institution’s experience”. Medicine (Baltimore). 70 (1): 46–66. PMID 1988766.
  22. Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
  23. Bravo EL (1991). “Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends”. Kidney Int. 40 (3): 544–56. PMID 1787652.
  24. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B (1995). “Bone cancers”. Cancer. 75 (1 Suppl): 203–10. PMID 8000997.
  25. Yarmish G, Klein MJ, Landa J, Lefkowitz RA, Hwang S (2010). “Imaging characteristics of primary osteosarcoma: nonconventional subtypes”. Radiographics. 30 (6): 1653–72. doi:10.1148/rg.306105524. PMID 21071381.
  26. Araki N, Uchida A, Kimura T, Yoshikawa H, Aoki Y, Ueda T; et al. (1991). “Involvement of the retinoblastoma gene in primary osteosarcomas and other bone and soft-tissue tumors”. Clin Orthop Relat Res (270): 271–7. PMID 1884549.
  27. Shmookler BM, Enzinger FM (1983). “Liposarcoma occurring in children. An analysis of 17 cases and review of the literature”. Cancer. 52 (3): 567–74. PMID 6861094.
  28. Marcus KC, Grier HE, Shamberger RC, Gebhardt MC, Perez-Atayde A, Silver B; et al. (1997). “Childhood soft tissue sarcoma: a 20-year experience”. J Pediatr. 131 (4): 603–7. PMID 9386667.
  29. Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Fanburg-Smith J (2005). “From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of musculoskeletal liposarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation”. Radiographics. 25 (5): 1371–95. doi:10.1148/rg.255055106. PMID 16160117.
  30. Italiano A, Cardot N, Dupré F, Monticelli I, Keslair F, Piche M; et al. (2007). “Gains and complex rearrangements of the 12q13-15 chromosomal region in ordinary lipomas: the “missing link” between lipomas and liposarcomas?”. Int J Cancer. 121 (2): 308–15. doi:10.1002/ijc.22685. PMID 17372913.
  31. Yamamoto JF, Goodman MT (2008). “Patterns of leukemia incidence in the United States by subtype and demographic characteristics, 1997-2002”. Cancer Causes Control. 19 (4): 379–90. doi:10.1007/s10552-007-9097-2. PMID 18064533.
  32. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Ley TJ, Miller C, Ding L, Raphael BJ, Mungall AJ; et al. (2013). “Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia”. N Engl J Med. 368 (22): 2059–74. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1301689. PMC 3767041. PMID 23634996.
  33. Islam A, Catovsky D, Goldman JM, Galton DA (1985). “Bone marrow biopsy changes in acute myeloid leukaemia. I: Observations before chemotherapy”. Histopathology. 9 (9): 939–57. PMID 3864727.
  34. Orazi A (2007). “Histopathology in the diagnosis and classification of acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases”. Pathobiology. 74 (2): 97–114. doi:10.1159/000101709. PMID 17587881.
  35. Zuckerman T, Rowe JM (2014). “Pathogenesis and prognostication in acute lymphoblastic leukemia”. F1000Prime Rep. 6: 59. doi:10.12703/P6-59. PMC 4108947. PMID 25184049.
  36. Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT (2008). “Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia”. Lancet. 371 (9617): 1030–43. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60457-2. PMID 18358930.
  37. Green MR, Gentles AJ, Nair RV, Irish JM, Kihira S, Liu CL; et al. (2013). “Hierarchy in somatic mutations arising during genomic evolution and progression of follicular lymphoma”. Blood. 121 (9): 1604–11. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-09-457283. PMC 3587323. PMID 23297126.
  38. Sandlund JT (2015). “Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children”. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 10 (3): 237–43. doi:10.1007/s11899-015-0277-y. PMID 26174528.
  39. El-Galaly TC, Hutchings M (2015). “Imaging of non-Hodgkin lymphomas: diagnosis and response-adapted strategies”. Cancer Treat Res. 165: 125–46. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13150-4_5. PMID 25655608.

Template:WH Template:WS

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

The incidence of esthesioneuroblastoma is approximately 0.4 per 100,000 individuals worldwide. Esthesioneuroblastoma can present in a wide range of age groups; however, it is mostly noted in a bimodal distribution, occurring most frequently in the second and sixth decades of life. There is no racial predilection to esthesioneuroblastoma.[1][2] Males are more commonly affected with esthesioneuroblastoma than females. The male to female ratio is approximately 1.2 to 1.[3][4][5][6]

Epidemiology and Demographics

Esthesioneuroblastoma is noted in 4 out of 10 million individuals, accounting for 5% of sinonasal and 3% of intracranial tumors.[1] Approximately 1,000 cases have been identified since Berger and Luc described the first case in 1924.[7] According to the BBC, only 201 cases of the disease have been recorded worldwide in the past two decades. A 1997 literature search identified 1,457 cases in the published literature since its discovery in 1924, however 487 were cited in more than one paper, bringing the total of reported cases to 945.[8]

Incidence

The incidence of esthesioneuroblastoma was estimated to be 0.4 cases per 100,000 individuals worldwide.

Age

Esthesioneuroblastoma commonly affects individuals in a wide range of age groups (3-90 years of age). There is a bimodal peak of occurrence in the third and sixth decades of life. The majority of cases of esthesioneuroblastoma occur in patients between 40 and 70 years of age; the median age at diagnosis is 53 years.

Race

There is no racial predilection to esthesioneuroblastoma.

Gender

Males are more commonly affected with esthesioneuroblastoma than females. The male to female ratio is approximately 1.2 to 1.[3][4][5][6]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Shirzadi, Ali S.; Drazin, Doniel G.; Strickland, Allison S.; Bannykh, Serguei I.; Johnson, J. Patrick (2013). “Vertebral Column Metastases from an Esthesioneuroblastoma: Chemotherapy, Radiation, and Resection for Recurrence with 15-Year Followup”. Case Reports in Surgery. 2013: 1–8. doi:10.1155/2013/107315. ISSN 2090-6900.
  2. Esthesioneuroblastoma. Radiopedia(2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/olfactory-neuroblastoma Accessed on January 25, 2016
  3. 3.0 3.1 Ward PD, Heth JA, Thompson BG, Marentette LJ (2009). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: Results and Outcomes of a Single Institution’s Experience”. Skull Base. 19 (2): 133–40. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1096195. PMC 2671304. PMID 19721769.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Diaz EM, Johnigan RH, Pero C, El-Naggar AK, Roberts DB, Barker JL; et al. (2005). “Olfactory neuroblastoma: the 22-year experience at one comprehensive cancer center”. Head Neck. 27 (2): 138–49. doi:10.1002/hed.20127. PMID 15654688.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Resto VA, Eisele DW, Forastiere A, Zahurak M, Lee DJ, Westra WH (2000). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: the Johns Hopkins experience”. Head Neck. 22 (6): 550–8. PMID 10941155.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Bachar G, Goldstein DP, Shah M, Tandon A, Ringash J, Pond G; et al. (2008). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: The Princess Margaret Hospital experience”. Head Neck. 30 (12): 1607–14. doi:10.1002/hed.20920. PMID 18798301.
  7. Broich G, Pagliari A, Ottaviani F (1997). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: a general review of the cases published since the discovery of the tumour in 1924”. Anticancer Res. 17 (4A): 2683–706. PMID 9252701.
  8. Esthesioneuroblastoma. Wikipedia(2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esthesioneuroblastoma Accessed on January 26, 2016

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

There are no established risk factors for esthesioneuroblastoma.

Risk Factors

There are no established risk factors for esthesioneuroblastoma

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force, screening for esthesioneuroblastoma is not recommended.[1]

Screening

According to the United States Preventive Services Task Force, screening for esthesioneuroblastoma is not recommended.[1]

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

If left untreated, 10%-62% of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma may progress to develop metastasis. Common complications of esthesioneuroblastoma include tumor recurrence and metastasis. These tumors often display varying biologic activity ranging from indolent growth, with patient survival exceeding 20 years, to a highly aggressive neoplasm capable of rapid widespread metastasis, with survival limited to a few months. The five-year mortality rate of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma is approximately 56% and 20% for grade I and II and grade III and IV tumors, respectively. The ten-year mortality rate of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma is approximately 67% and 34% for grade I and II and grade III and IV tumors, respectively.[1][2]

Natural History

Esthesioneuroblastoma tumors display varying clinical behaviors ranging from indolent growth to highly aggressive invasion.[1] The average delay between the appearance of the initial symptom and the diagnosis is six months, however diagnosis may be delayed for years in some cases. The delay is predictable because initial symptoms tend to be subtle and are frequently common, occurring also in nasal diseases, including allergic polypoid sinus disease or long-term rhinosinusitis.[3] Clinical presentation is usually secondary to nasal stuffiness and rhinorrhea or epistaxis. Presentation is often delayed and symptoms may have been present for many months. Patients often present late with larger tumors which can extend into the intracranial compartment (25-30% at diagnosis) and usually result in anosmia. Despite aggressive therapy, esthesioneuroblastoma has been noted to have a high local recurrence rate of approximately 50–60% with 10–62% presenting as metastatic cases and 20–30% of those cases involving the CNS. Once esthesioneuroblastoma cells invade the cribriform plate, they may spread to the anterior skull base, extend to the leptomeninges or brain parenchyma and can lead to drop metastasis anywhere in central neural axis.[2] Retropharyngeal lymph nodes are at risk for metastatic disease, however level II lymph nodes are most frequently involved.[4] Cervical and retropharyngeal nodal metastases are present in 10-44% of cases at diagnosis.[5]

Complications

Prognosis

  • The majority of studies have found a correlation between Hyams grade and prognosis.[6][7][8][9]
  • The prognosis depends on the magnitude of the disease on initial diagnosis.
  • Esthesioneuroblastomas often display varying biologic activity ranging from indolent growth, with patient survival exceeding twenty years, to a highly aggressive neoplasm capable of rapid widespread metastasis, with survival limited to a few months.
  • CNS metastasis is reported to have a survival expectancy of two years or less and is usually noted 0–10 years after the initial diagnosis.
  • Spinal metastasis of esthesioneuroblastoma is rare with only 28 documented cases involving the spine, spinal cord, or leptomeninges.[10]
  • The metastatic rate of esthesioneuroblastoma has been estimated to range from 10 to 62 percent. The most common site of metastatic disease is the cervical lymph nodes but metastatic disease has been found in the parotid, long bones, meninges, breast, lung, prostate, abdominal viscera, and pelvis.
  • The rate of local recurrence for this tumor after therapy is 57% with a survival rate of 56% at the end of five years.
  • Prognostic factors must be considered when determining the best treatment for esthesioneuroblasstoma. Murakami et al. reported that histological tumor grade and complete surgical resection are the two most important prognostic factors. Hwang et al. emphasized the importance of diagnosing the disease in an early stage and regular radiologic followups to detect disease recurrence, to improve prognosis.[2]

The relationship between grade of the tumor and ten-year survival is shown below in a tabular form:

Grade of the tumor Ten-year survival
Grade I and II tumors
  • 67%
High-grade lesions (III and IV)
  • 34%

The relationshiip between grade of the tumor and five-year survival is shown below in a tabular form:[9]

Grade of the tumor Five-year survival
Low-grade lesions (Hyams I and II)
  • 56%
High-grade lesions (Hyams III and IV)
  • 20%

The relationship between metastasis and five-year survival of the tumor is shown below in a tabular form:[5]

Metastasis Five-year survival
No distant metastases
  • 60%
Distant metastases
  • 0%
Small localised tumors
  • 85-90%

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Kane, Ari J., et al. “Posttreatment prognosis of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma: clinical article.” Journal of neurosurgery 113.2 (2010): 340-351.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Shirzadi, Ali S.; Drazin, Doniel G.; Strickland, Allison S.; Bannykh, Serguei I.; Johnson, J. Patrick (2013). “Vertebral Column Metastases from an Esthesioneuroblastoma: Chemotherapy, Radiation, and Resection for Recurrence with 15-Year Followup”. Case Reports in Surgery. 2013: 1–8. doi:10.1155/2013/107315. ISSN 2090-6900.
  3. Zhang M, Zhou L, Wang DH, Huang WT, Wang SY (2010). “Diagnosis and management of esthesioneuroblastoma”. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 72 (2): 113–8. doi:10.1159/000278255. PMID 20453548.
  4. Howell MC, Branstetter BF, Snyderman CH (2011). “Patterns of regional spread for esthesioneuroblastoma”. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 32 (5): 929–33. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2401. PMID 21349970.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Esthesioneuroblastoma. Radiopedia(2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/olfactory-neuroblastoma Accessed on January 25, 2016
  6. Dulguerov P, Calcaterra T (1992). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: the UCLA experience 1970-1990”. Laryngoscope. 102 (8): 843–9. PMID 1495347.
  7. Kairemo KJ, Jekunen AP, Kestilä MS, Ramsay HA (1998). “Imaging of olfactory neuroblastoma–an analysis of 17 cases”. Auris Nasus Larynx. 25 (2): 173–9. PMID 9673731.
  8. Hyams, V. J. (1988). Tumors of the upper respiratory tract and ear. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Dulguerov P, Allal AS, Calcaterra TC (2001). “Esthesioneuroblastoma: a meta-analysis and review”. Lancet Oncol. 2 (11): 683–90. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00558-7. PMID 11902539.
  10. Shaari, Christopher M., et al. “Central nervous system metastases from esthesioneuroblastoma.” Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 114.6 (1996): 808-812.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | CT | MRI | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case#1


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH