Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2] Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

For the patient information page on this topic, click here.

Synonyms and keywords: NASH, NAFLD, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2] Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

Overview

A non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, also called metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in the new AASLD nomenclature, is a form of chronic hepatitis that shares the histologic features of alcohol-induced hepatitis but is found in patients without prior history of alcohol abuse. MASLD is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide.Based on the severity of the disease non-alcoholic fatty liver disease encompasses a range of disorders including mild steatosis, steatohepatitis, advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, fulminant hepatic failure, and less commonly hepatocellular carcinoma. Risk factors for non alcoholic liver disease include obesity, diabetes mellitus type 2, hyperlipidemia, and sudden dramatic weight loss. The diagnosis of NAFLD should be considered in any patient presenting with elevated transaminases without any underlying condition or pathological process. NAFLD is diagnosed when hepatic steatosis is detected, usually by abdominal ultrasonography, in association with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor and in the absence of significant alcohol intake or another known cause of hepatic steatosis. NAFLD must be distinguished from steatosis and steatohepatitis due to secondary causes. These include various forms of malnutrition, drugs (eg, warfarin, methotrexate, amiodarone, glucocorticoids, synthetic estrogens, tamoxifen, and various antibiotic and antiviral agents), metabolic and genetic disorders (eg lipodystrophy, dysbetalipoproteinemia, and acute fatty liver of pregnancy), use of total parenteral nutrition, and gastric bypass and other weight loss surgeries. NAFLD is mostly seen in obese individuals but may be encountered in thin or normal weight patients. MASLD affects approximately 30% to 40% of adults worldwide, including approximately 60% to 70% of individuals with type 2 diabetes and approximately 70% to 80% of individuals with obesity. Insulin resistance is a core feature of NAFLD, diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia. NAFLD can therefore be considered part of the insulin resistance (or metabolic) syndrome. Insulin resistance leads to accumulation of fat within hepatocytesvialipogenesis (and inhibition of lipolysis) and hyperinsulinemia. The pathogenesis of NAFLD and its progression to NASH appears to result from a two-step process, whereby an initial insult in the form of insulin resistance due to genetic and acquired factors leads to hyperinsulinemia and accumulation of fat within hepatocytes (steatosis). The steatotic liver is then vulnerable to further insult; hepatocellular injury and fibrosis may develop in the presence of oxidative stress and the proinflammatory activity of cytokines and similar agents. This leads to exacerbation of insulin resistance; further oxidative stress; and acceleration of inflammatory, degenerative, and fibrotic processes. The natural history of NAFLD is dependent on the stage of the disease. The prognosis of simple steatosis seems to be relatively benign, with a 1% to 2% risk of developing cirrhosis over 15 to 20 years. Patients with NASH and fibrosis can progress to cirrhosis, which can lead to end-stage liver disease; hepatic decompensation; or hepatocellular carcinoma, a rare, end-stage outcome. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among patients with noncirrhotic MASLD, followed by certain extrahepatic cancers and liver-related complications. In patients with MASLD-related cirrhosis, liver-related and cardiovascular disease-related deaths are the predominant causes of mortality. Imaging techniques can be helpful by showing steatosis, but liver biopsy is the only way to assess the severity of inflammation and fibrosis. The mainstay of treatment for NAFLD is lifestyle modifications and treatment of underlying risk factors such as obesity, diabetes mellitus type 2, and hyperlipidemia. First-line treatment includes behavioral modification with a weight-reducing diet, increased physical activity, alcohol avoidance, and management of type 2 diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Resmetirom and semaglutide are conditionally approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for adults with noncirrhotic MASH and moderate to advanced fibrosis.
Figure 1. Overview of prevalence, diagnosis, complications, and fibrosis risk stratification in MASLD.

Historical Perspective

Ludwig was the first physician to describe the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a separate medical entity from other fatty liver diseases.

Classification

Non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFLD) disease may be classified into:

  • Non-alcoholic fatty liver or hepatic steatosis
  • Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Steatotic liver disease may be subclassified according to the presence of cardiometabolic risk factors, alcohol intake, and other causes of hepatic steatosis.

Category Definition
MASLD Hepatic steatosis with at least 1 cardiometabolic risk factor, alcohol intake less than 140 g/week in women and less than 210 g/week in men, and no other known cause of hepatic steatosis
Metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related liver disease (MetALD) Hepatic steatosis with metabolic dysfunction and alcohol intake of 140-350 g/week in women or 210-420 g/week in men
Alcohol-associated liver disease Alcohol intake greater than 350 g/week in women or greater than 420 g/week in men
Cryptogenic steatotic liver disease Hepatic steatosis without cardiometabolic risk factors and without an identifiable cause
Specific-etiology steatotic liver disease Hepatic steatosis due to another identifiable cause, such as drug-induced liver injury, iron overload, genotype 3 hepatitis C, Wilson disease, lysosomal acid lipase deficiency, hypobetalipoproteinemia, inborn errors of metabolism, celiac disease, malnutrition, or HIV infection

(One standard drink is approximately equivalent to 10 g of alcohol, corresponding approximately to 12 oz of beer, 5 oz of wine, or 1.5 oz of 80-proof distilled spirits.)

Based on liver biopsy histology, liver fibrosis in MASLD is scored using a 5-stage scale:

Stage Histologic description
F0 Absence of fibrosis
F1 Perisinusoidal or portal fibrosis
F2 Perisinusoidal and portal or periportal fibrosis
F3 Septal and bridging fibrosis
F4 Cirrhosis

Pathophysiology

The exact pathogenesis of NAFLD is not fully understood, but is believed due to interaction of multiple factors such as obesity, Insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome. Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic liver disease can be best explained by 2 hit hypothesis. The first hit is steatosis. The second hit is controversial and is likely cause changes that leads from hepatic steatosis to hepatic inflammation and fibrosis by way of lipid peroxidation.

The pathogenesis of MASLD is multifactorial. Hepatic steatosis develops due to increased hepatic uptake of free fatty acids, increased de novo hepatic lipogenesis, decreased hepatic fatty acid oxidation, and reduced hepatic export of triglycerides into very low-density lipoproteins. Systemic insulin resistance promotes adipose tissue lipolysis and hepatic de novo lipogenesis, thereby increasing hepatic lipid accumulation. Progression from isolated steatosis to MASH is associated with lipotoxicity, in which accumulation of triglycerides, free cholesterol, saturated fatty acids, and ceramides contributes to hepatic inflammation, cellular dysfunction, and cell death. Metabolic factors, diet, genetic susceptibility, adipose tissue inflammation, and the gut microbiome may also contribute to disease progression.

Dietary factors, including high intake of glucose, fructose, saturated fats, and processed foods, may promote low-grade inflammation in the liver and extrahepatic organs. Excess adipose tissue contributes to systemic inflammation through increased release of proinflammatory cytokines and recruitment and activation of immune cells, particularly macrophages. The older two-hit hypothesis should be regarded as historical background. Current evidence supports a broader multifactorial model in which insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, diet, adipose tissue inflammation, genetics, and gut microbiome-related pathways act together to promote progression from steatosis to MASH and fibrosis.

MASLD is a multisystem metabolic disease associated with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, incident type 2 diabetes, and certain extrahepatic cancers, particularly gastrointestinal, breast, and gynecologic cancers.

Causes

Common causes in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is related to obesity which will result in insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Less commonly patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia are also associated with developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

The most important clinical risk factors for MASLD are abdominal overweight or obesity, insulin resistance, prediabetes, and type 2 diabetes. The risk of developing MASLD and progressing to MASH increases with the number of metabolic syndrome features, including abdominal obesity, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol, and elevated blood glucose.

Cardiometabolic risk factors used in the classification of MASLD include

  • body mass index of 25 or greater, or 23 or greater in Asian individuals;
  • waist circumference of 80 cm or greater in women and 94 cm or greater in men;
  • fasting glucose level of 5.6 mmol/L or greater, 2-hour postload glucose level of 7.8 mmol/L or greater, hemoglobin A1c level of 5.7% or greater, established type 2 diabetes, or use of glucose-lowering medication;
  • blood pressure of 130/85 mm Hg or greater or use of antihypertensive medication;
  • plasma triglyceride level of 1.70 mmol/L or greater or use of triglyceride-lowering medication;
  • and low HDL cholesterol.

Other contributors include older age, male sex, postmenopausal status, PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 genetic variants, sedentary lifestyle, smoking, high fructose intake, alcohol consumption above MASLD thresholds, and high-calorie diets rich in saturated fats, sugars, and processed foods.

Other known causes of hepatic steatosis that should be excluded include use of corticosteroids, methotrexate, or tamoxifen; hepatitis C virus infection; iron overload; celiac disease; HIV infection; malnutrition; Wilson disease; lysosomal acid lipase deficiency; hypobetalipoproteinemia; and inborn errors of metabolism.

Differentiating Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease from Other Diseas

Usually, NAFLD presents with no or few symptoms but if symptomatic NAFLD must be differentiated from other diseases that cause jaundice and abdominal pain which include Wilson’s disease, hemochromatosis, alcoholic hepatitis, cholestatic jaundice, drug-induced liver injury, hepatitis C virus infection, celiac disease, HIV infection, malnutrition, lysosomal acid lipase deficiency, hypobetalipoproteinemia, and inborn errors of metabolism.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The estimated annual incidence of non alcoholic liver disease with steatosis in the United States is approximately 9,255 per 100,000 individuals. The prevalence of non-alcoholic liver disease in the United States is estimated to be 10,000 to 24,000 cases per 100,000 individuals annually. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease may occur at any age, but is diagnosed most commonly in patients aged 50 to 60 years. Hepatic steatosis is more prevalent in the hispanics.

Approximately 30% to 40% of adults worldwide have MASLD. The prevalence is substantially higher among individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity, affecting approximately 60% to 70% of individuals with type 2 diabetes and approximately 70% to 80% of individuals with obesity.

In a systematic review of 92 population-based studies from 1990 to 2019, the highest prevalence of ultrasound-detected MASLD was observed in Latin America and the lowest in Western Europe. By 2040, the global prevalence of MASLD among adults is projected to exceed 55%.

In 2021, the global age-standardized prevalence of MASLD was 15,018 per 100,000 population, and the annual incidence was 608 per 100,000 population. The prevalence was higher in men than women and peaked at 45 to 49 years of age in men and 50 to 54 years of age in women.

Among individuals with type 2 diabetes, the global pooled prevalence of MASLD based on ultrasonography was 65.3%. Among individuals with type 2 diabetes who had liver biopsy data, the global histological prevalence of MASH was 66.4%, stage F2 fibrosis was present in 40.8%, and advanced fibrosis, defined as stage F3 or F4, was present in 15.5%.

MASLD prevalence is higher in men than women. In global 2021 estimates, prevalence peaked at 45 to 49 years of age in men and at 50 to 54 years of age in women. Other risk factors for MASLD development and progression include older age, male sex, and postmenopausal status.

Risk Factors

The most potent risk factor in the development of NAFLD is obesity. Other risk factors include insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.

Risk factors for MASLD include:

  • Abdominal overweight or obesity
  • Insulin resistance
  • Prediabetes or type 2 diabetes
  • Hypertension
  • Hypertriglyceridemia
  • Low HDL cholesterol
  • Elevated fasting glucose or hemoglobin A1c
  • Older age
  • Male sex
  • Postmenopausal status
  • PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 genetic variants
  • Sedentary lifestyle
  • Smoking
  • High intake of fructose, especially from sugar-sweetened beverages
  • High-calorie diets rich in saturated fats, sugars, and processed foods
  • Alcohol intake above MASLD thresholds

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for NAFLD in general population. However, screening is recommended in high-risk population groups(obesity, insulin resistance and patients with metabolic syndrome) as more than 50 million Americans have been estimated to have metabolic syndrome and about 80% of them have NAFD.

Universal screening for MASLD is not recommended. Current guidelines summarized in the JAMA review recommend a 2-tier testing approach to screen for advanced liver fibrosis in high-risk populations, including individuals with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes, obesity, 2 or more cardiometabolic risk factors, imaging-detected hepatic steatosis, or persistently elevated serum aminotransferase levels.

The first step is calculation of the Fibrosis-4 index, usually performed in primary care. Patients with a Fibrosis-4 index greater than 1.3 should undergo vibration-controlled transient elastography or another noninvasive test, such as the enhanced liver fibrosis test. Patients with liver stiffness greater than 8.0 kPa or an enhanced liver fibrosis test score greater than 9.8 should be referred to a hepatologist.

FIB-4 score Interpretation
<1.30 Low risk of advanced fibrosis
1.30-2.67 Indeterminate risk of advanced fibrosis
>2.67 High risk of advanced fibrosis

Patients with a FIB-4 score less than 1.3 should undergo lifestyle modification, avoidance of alcohol intake, and treatment of type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Repeat FIB-4 testing may be performed every 1 to 3 years. Patients with indeterminate or high-risk findings should undergo additional noninvasive fibrosis assessment and may require hepatology referral.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

If left untreated non alcoholic fatty liver disease may progress to fibrosis and, later cirrhosis. Studies of serial liver biopsies estimate a 26-37% rate of hepatic fibrosis and 2-15% rate of cirrhosis in less than 6 years. Common complications of NAFLD include fibrosis, cirrhosis, internal bleeding, encephalopathy. The presence of fibrosis and cirrhosisassociated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with NAFLD.

Approximately 15% to 40% of patients with isolated hepatic steatosis progress to MASH. Fibrosis progression is usually slow, with progression of approximately 1 fibrosis stage over 14 years among patients with isolated steatosis and approximately 1 fibrosis stage over 7 years among patients with MASH. More advanced fibrosis is the strongest risk factor for progression to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and liver-related mortality.

In a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with histologically confirmed MASLD, 2% to 3% of patients with isolated steatosis developed advanced fibrosis over 15 to 20 years, while approximately 25% to 30% of patients with MASH developed advanced fibrosis within 8 to 10 years. Among patients with biopsy-confirmed MASH and F3 fibrosis, 22% progressed to cirrhosis over 2 years.

Cirrhosis is associated with hepatic decompensation events, including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding, which occur at rates of about 10% annually. Up to nearly 2.5% of patients with cirrhosis develop incident hepatocellular carcinoma annually.

Complications of MASLD include advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, incident type 2 diabetes, and certain extrahepatic cancers. Hepatic decompensation events include ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding.

Fibrosis stage is the strongest prognostic factor for liver-related morbidity and mortality. Compared with patients with no fibrosis, patients with cirrhosis have substantially higher risks of liver-related events, liver-related mortality, liver transplantation, and all-cause mortality.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with noncirrhotic MASLD, followed by extrahepatic cancer and liver-related complications. In patients with MASLD-related cirrhosis, liver-related and cardiovascular disease-related deaths are the predominant causes of mortality.

MASLD is associated with increased risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3 or higher, atrial fibrillation, incident type 2 diabetes, and certain extrahepatic cancers. Extrahepatic cancers associated with MASLD include esophageal, stomach, pancreatic, colorectal, breast, and gynecologic cancers.

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

The majority of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are asymptomatic. However, very rarely patients may complain of fatigue, malaise and dull right upper quadrant abdominal discomfort. Mild jaundice can also be noticed. Often following an asymptomatic course, the disease may present first with cirrhosis and/or the complication of portal hypertension.

MASLD is often detected incidentally when hepatic steatosis is identified on abdominal ultrasonography performed for another indication or when mild to moderate elevations in serum aminotransferase levels are found.

Physical Examination

Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease usually appear normal. Physical examination of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is usually unremarkable.

Approximately 50% to 60% of patients with MASLD have mild to moderate hepatomegaly, while less than 5% have splenomegaly. More than 80% of patients are overweight or obese, 60% to 70% have atherogenic dyslipidemia, approximately 60% have prediabetes or type 2 diabetes, and up to 50% have hypertension.

Laboratory Findings

There are no specific diagnostic laboratory findings associated with non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Laboratory findings include abnormal liver function tests but are unspecific. Other laboratory tests are generally performed to rule out other diagnosis.

Normal aminotransferase levels do not exclude clinically significant MASLD. Up to two-thirds of patients with MASLD, including patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, may have normal serum aminotransferase levels, and serum ALT levels do not correlate well with histological severity.

Laboratory evaluation should include assessment of metabolic risk factors and exclusion of alternative causes of hepatic steatosis. Noninvasive fibrosis assessment commonly includes the Fibrosis-4 index and the enhanced liver fibrosis test.

Fibrosis score

The Fibrosis-4 index includes age, serum alanine aminotransferase level, serum aspartate aminotransferase level, and platelet count. It estimates the risk of advanced liver fibrosis as low when the score is less than 1.30, indeterminate when the score is 1.30 to 2.67, and high when the score is greater than 2.67. A Fibrosis-4 index less than 1.3 has a negative predictive value of 85% to 90% for detecting advanced liver fibrosis.

The enhanced liver fibrosis test uses tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, type III procollagen amino terminal peptide, and hyaluronic acid to generate a fibrosis severity score. The enhanced liver fibrosis test has a sensitivity of approximately 98% for detecting advanced liver fibrosis.

The Agile 3+ score combines liver stiffness measured by vibration-controlled transient elastography with aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio, platelet count, diabetes status, sex, and age. It may identify advanced fibrosis more accurately than the Fibrosis-4 index or liver stiffness measurement alone.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with NAFLD.

X-ray

There are no x-ray findings associated with NAFLD.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound may be helpful in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Increased echogenicity and coarsened echotexture of the liver is the most prominent and diagnostic finding on an ultrasound in patients diagnosed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Abdominal ultrasonography is the first-line imaging test for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. Sonographic findings include increased hepatic echogenicity compared with the renal cortex, decreased visibility of intrahepatic vessels, and impaired visualization of the diaphragm and deeper liver tissue.

Ultrasonography has a sensitivity of 80% to 89% and specificity of 87% to 90% for detecting moderate to severe steatosis, but sensitivity is less than 50% for mild steatosis when hepatic fat content is less than 20%.

CT scan

CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Findings on a CT scan diagnostic for non-alcoholic liver disease include a diffuse, low-density hepatic parenchyma without mass effect.

MRI

An MRI is one of the best tools in imaging modalities available to diagnose NAFLD. An MRI is simple to test which allows quantification of the hepatic steatosis. MRI has a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 93% in diagnosing NAFLD. However, it uses is limited because of the cost.

Magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction has a sensitivity of 77% to 92% and specificity of 87% to 94% for detecting any degree of hepatic steatosis. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy has sensitivity and specificity of approximately 95% to 98%, but these methods are primarily used in clinical trials and specialized centers.

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Hepattic steatosis can be measured with the Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). The controlled attenuation parameter measures attenuation of ultrasound waves through the liver and is usually performed with vibration-controlled transient elastography. A controlled attenuation parameter value of 248 dB/m or greater is considered diagnostic for hepatic steatosis, and higher values indicate more severe steatosis. Compared with conventional ultrasonography, controlled attenuation parameter has similar sensitivity and slightly higher specificity, approximately 90%, for detecting hepatic steatosis.

Vibration-controlled transient elastography is used to noninvasively measure liver stiffness and is commonly used after FIB-4 testing in patients at increased risk for advanced fibrosis. A liver stiffness measurement greater than 8.0 kPa should prompt referral to a hepatologist for further evaluation.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Liver biopsy may be helpful in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Findings on biopsy include macrovesicular steatosis, inflammation, ballooning degeneration, zone 3 perivenular/periportal/perisinusoidal fibrosis and, finally, mallory bodies.

Liver biopsy is the criterion standard for diagnosing MASH and staging hepatic fibrosis, but it is invasive, costly, and associated with rare acute bleeding. Liver biopsy is not typically required to diagnose MASLD, but may be useful when the etiology of liver disease is uncertain, when noninvasive tests are inconclusive, or when MASLD coexists with other liver diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis or viral hepatitis.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Weight loss, withdrawal of hepatotoxic agents, and management of underlying insulin resistance/metabolic syndrome is the mainstay of treatment in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Resmetirom and semaglutide are conditionally approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with noncirrhotic MASH and moderate to severe fibrosis, corresponding to fibrosis stages F2 to F3. No randomized clinical trial has compared combination therapy with resmetirom and semaglutide for MASH with moderate to advanced fibrosis.

Surgery

Bariatric surgery should be considered in selected patients with MASLD and obesity with a body mass index greater than 35, especially when behavioral modification or pharmacologic treatment has not improved imaging-detected hepatic steatosis or liver fibrosis.

Bariatric surgery, including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy, should be considered in selected patients with MASLD and obesity with a body mass index greater than 35, particularly in those without improvement in imaging-detected hepatic steatosis or fibrosis after behavioral modification or medication therapy.

In a bariatric surgery cohort of 180 patients with severe obesity and biopsy-proven MASH, histological resolution of MASH occurred in 84% of patients and fibrosis reduction occurred in 70% of patients at 5-year follow-up. In an observational study of 1158 adults with histologically confirmed MASH and fibrosis stages F1 to F3, bariatric surgery was associated with a lower 10-year cumulative incidence of major adverse liver-related events compared with nonsurgical care and a lower 10-year cumulative incidence of cardiovascular disease events.

Primary Prevention

Effective measures for the primary prevention of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease include maintaining a healthy weight, reducing excess caloric intake, limiting ultraprocessed foods, saturated fats, refined sugars, and sugar-sweetened beverages, engaging in regular physical activity, avoiding alcohol intake, and effectively managing type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

References

Template:WS Template:WH

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2]

Overview

Ludwig was the first physician to describe the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a separate medical entity from other fatty liver diseases.

Historical Perspective

  • In 1980, Ludwig was the first physician to describe non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a separate medical entity from other fatty liver diseases.[1][2][3]
  • In 1983, Adler & Schaffner described the association between obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
  • In 1984, Andersen & Gluud conducted numerous experiments with extensive documentation of the liver biopsies in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
  • In 1985, Bockus was the first to coin the term non-alcoholic fatty liver.

References

  1. Vizuete J, Camero A, Malakouti M, Garapati K, Gutierrez J (2017). “Perspectives on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Overview of Present and Future Therapies”. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 5 (1): 67–75. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00061. PMC 5411359. PMID 28507929.
  2. Vizuete J, Camero A, Malakouti M, Garapati K, Gutierrez J (2017). “Perspectives on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Overview of Present and Future Therapies”. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 5 (1): 67–75. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00061. PMC 5411359. PMID 28507929.
  3. Ludwig J, Viggiano TR, McGill DB, Oh BJ (1980). “Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Mayo Clinic experiences with a hitherto unnamed disease”. Mayo Clin. Proc. 55 (7): 434–8. PMID 7382552.

Template:WS Template:WH

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2]Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

Overview

Non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFLD) disease may be classified based on clinical presentation into non-alcoholic fatty liver and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

Clinical Classification

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease may be classified based on clinical presentation into non-alcoholic fatty liver and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.[1][2][3]

Based on clinical presentation
Non-alcoholic fatty liver Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
  • Benign
  • Aggressive
  • Non-progressive
Based on Etiology
  • Primary NAFLD
  • If the cause of the liver disease was unknown.
  • Secondary NAFLD


Steatotic liver disease may be subclassified according to the presence of cardiometabolic risk factors, alcohol intake, and other causes of hepatic steatosis.[4]

Category Definition
MASLD Hepatic steatosis with at least 1 cardiometabolic risk factor, alcohol intake less than 140 g/week in women and less than 210 g/week in men, and no other known cause of hepatic steatosis
Metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related liver disease (MetALD) Hepatic steatosis with metabolic dysfunction and alcohol intake of 140-350 g/week in women or 210-420 g/week in men
Alcohol-associated liver disease Alcohol intake greater than 350 g/week in women or greater than 420 g/week in men
Cryptogenic steatotic liver disease Hepatic steatosis without cardiometabolic risk factors and without an identifiable cause
Specific-etiology steatotic liver disease Hepatic steatosis due to another identifiable cause, such as drug-induced liver injury, iron overload, genotype 3 hepatitis C, Wilson disease, lysosomal acid lipase deficiency, hypobetalipoproteinemia, inborn errors of metabolism, celiac disease, malnutrition, or HIV infection

One standard drink is approximately equivalent to 10 g of alcohol, corresponding approximately to 12 oz of beer, 5 oz of wine, or 1.5 oz of 80-proof distilled spirits.

Histopathological classification

Histological classification of NAFLD includes grading and staging.

  • Grade: Depending on degree of steatosis and necro-inflammatory activity
  • Stage: Depending on degree of fibrosis.

Grading

NAFLD activity score is employed for grading steatohepatitis of NASH. NAS represents the sum of scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning.[5]

Component Range Score
Steatosis <5% 0
5-33% 1
34-66% 2
>66% 3
Lobular Inflammation None 0
<2 focci 1
2-4 2
>4 3
Hepatocyte -Balloning None 0
Few ballooned cells 1
Many ballooned cells 2
Interpretation 0-2 Non-diagnostic
3-4 Borderline
5-8 Diagnostic

Staging

Based on liver biopsy histology, liver fibrosis in MASLD is scored using a 5-stage scale:

Stage Histologic description
F0 Absence of fibrosis
F1 Perisinusoidal or portal fibrosis
F2 Perisinusoidal and portal or periportal fibrosis
F3 Septal and bridging fibrosis
F4 Cirrhosis

References

  1. Hashimoto E, Tokushige K, Ludwig J (2015). “Diagnosis and classification of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: Current concepts and remaining challenges”. Hepatol Res. 45 (1): 20–8. doi:10.1111/hepr.12333. PMID 24661406.
  2. Cobbina E, Akhlaghi F (2017). “Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) – pathogenesis, classification, and effect on drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters”. Drug Metab Rev. 49 (2): 197–211. doi:10.1080/03602532.2017.1293683. PMC 5576152. PMID 28303724.
  3. Monteiro JM, Monteiro GM, Caroli-Bottino A, Pannain VL (2014). “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: different classifications concordance and relationship between degrees of morphological features and spectrum of the disease”. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2014: 526979. doi:10.1155/2014/526979. PMC 4333905. PMID 25763333.
  4. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).
  5. Vizuete J, Camero A, Malakouti M, Garapati K, Gutierrez J (2017). “Perspectives on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Overview of Present and Future Therapies”. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 5 (1): 67–75. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00061. PMC 5411359. PMID 28507929.

Template:WS Template:WH

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Manpreet Kaur, MD [2] Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

Overview

The pathogenesis of MASLD is multifactorial. The exact pathogenesis of NAFLD is not fully understood but is believed due to the interaction of multiple factors such as obesity, Insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome. Hepatic steatosis develops due to increased hepatic uptake of free fatty acids, increased de novo hepatic lipogenesis, decreased hepatic fatty acid oxidation, and reduced hepatic export of triglycerides into very low-density lipoproteins. Systemic insulin resistance promotes adipose tissue lipolysis and hepatic de novo lipogenesis, thereby increasing hepatic lipid accumulation. Progression from isolated steatosis to MASH is associated with lipotoxicity, in which accumulation of triglycerides, free cholesterol, saturated fatty acids, and ceramides contributes to hepatic inflammation, cellular dysfunction, and cell death. Metabolic factors, diet, genetic susceptibility, adipose tissue inflammation, and the gut microbiome may also contribute to disease progression. Dietary factors, including high intake of glucose, fructose, saturated fats, and processed foods, may promote low-grade inflammation in the liver and extrahepatic organs. Excess adipose tissue contributes to systemic inflammation through increased release of proinflammatory cytokines and recruitment and activation of immune cells, particularly macrophages.[1]

Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic liver disease was previously explained by 2 hit hypothesis. The first hit is steatosis. The second hit is controversial and is likely cause changes that leads from hepatic steatosis to hepatic inflammation and fibrosis by way of lipid peroxidation. The older two-hit hypothesis should be regarded as historical background. Current evidence supports a broader multifactorial model in which insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, diet, adipose tissue inflammation, genetics, and gut microbiome-related pathways act together to promote progression from steatosis to MASH and fibrosis.

Pathophysiology

The exact pathogenesis of NAFLD is not fully understood but is believed due to the interaction of multiple factors.

2 hit hypothesis

Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic liver disease can be summarized by 2 hit hypothesis. According to 2 hit hypothesis:

  • The first hit results in increased fat accumulation especially triglycerides within the hepatocyte and increases the risk of liver injury.
  • On the second hit inflammatory cytokines causes mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress which in turn lead to steatohepatitis and/or fibrosis.[2]

Free fatty acids

Endotoxins[7][8][9]

Adiponectin

Adenosine[14]

Fibroblast Growth Factor 21[16]

Associated Conditions

Microscopic Pathology

On microscopic histopathological analysis, characteristic findings of the non-alcoholic liver disease include:

References

  1. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Dowman JK, Tomlinson JW, Newsome PN (2010). “Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease”. QJM. 103 (2): 71–83. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcp158. PMC 2810391. PMID 19914930.
  3. Petta S, Gastaldelli A, Rebelos E, Bugianesi E, Messa P, Miele L, Svegliati-Baroni G, Valenti L, Bonino F (2016). “Pathophysiology of Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease”. Int J Mol Sci. 17 (12). doi:10.3390/ijms17122082. PMC 5187882. PMID 27973438.
  4. Postic C, Girard J (2008). “Contribution of de novo fatty acid synthesis to hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance: lessons from genetically engineered mice”. J. Clin. Invest. 118 (3): 829–38. doi:10.1172/JCI34275. PMC 2254980. PMID 18317565.
  5. Jou J, Choi SS, Diehl AM (2008). “Mechanisms of disease progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease”. Semin. Liver Dis. 28 (4): 370–9. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1091981. PMID 18956293.
  6. Feldstein AE, Werneburg NW, Canbay A, Guicciardi ME, Bronk SF, Rydzewski R, Burgart LJ, Gores GJ (2004). “Free fatty acids promote hepatic lipotoxicity by stimulating TNF-alpha expression via a lysosomal pathway”. Hepatology. 40 (1): 185–94. doi:10.1002/hep.20283. PMID 15239102.
  7. Harte AL, da Silva NF, Creely SJ, McGee KC, Billyard T, Youssef-Elabd EM, Tripathi G, Ashour E, Abdalla MS, Sharada HM, Amin AI, Burt AD, Kumar S, Day CP, McTernan PG (2010). “Elevated endotoxin levels in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease”. J Inflamm (Lond). 7: 15. doi:10.1186/1476-9255-7-15. PMC 2873499. PMID 20353583.
  8. Fukunishi S, Sujishi T, Takeshita A, Ohama H, Tsuchimoto Y, Asai A, Tsuda Y, Higuchi K (2014). “Lipopolysaccharides accelerate hepatic steatosis in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Zucker rats”. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 54 (1): 39–44. doi:10.3164/jcbn.13-49. PMC 3882483. PMID 24426189.
  9. Harte AL, da Silva NF, Creely SJ, McGee KC, Billyard T, Youssef-Elabd EM, Tripathi G, Ashour E, Abdalla MS, Sharada HM, Amin AI, Burt AD, Kumar S, Day CP, McTernan PG (2010). “Elevated endotoxin levels in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease”. J Inflamm (Lond). 7: 15. doi:10.1186/1476-9255-7-15. PMC 2873499. PMID 20353583.
  10. Choi SS, Diehl AM (2008). “Hepatic triglyceride synthesis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease”. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 19 (3): 295–300. doi:10.1097/MOL.0b013e3282ff5e55. PMID 18460922.
  11. Polyzos SA, Kountouras J, Zavos C, Tsiaousi E (2010). “The role of adiponectin in the pathogenesis and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease”. Diabetes Obes Metab. 12 (5): 365–83. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01176.x. PMID 20415685.
  12. Polyzos SA, Kountouras J, Zavos C (2009). “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the pathogenetic roles of insulin resistance and adipocytokines”. Curr. Mol. Med. 9 (3): 299–314. PMID 19355912.
  13. Finelli C, Tarantino G (2013). “What is the role of adiponectin in obesity related non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?”. World J. Gastroenterol. 19 (6): 802–12. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.802. PMC 3574877. PMID 23430039.
  14. Robson SC, Schuppan D (2010). “Adenosine: tipping the balance towards hepatic steatosis and fibrosis”. J. Hepatol. 52 (6): 941–3. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.02.009. PMC 2875264. PMID 20395005.
  15. Enjyoji K, Kotani K, Thukral C, Blumel B, Sun X, Wu Y, Imai M, Friedman D, Csizmadia E, Bleibel W, Kahn BB, Robson SC (2008). “Deletion of cd39/entpd1 results in hepatic insulin resistance”. Diabetes. 57 (9): 2311–20. doi:10.2337/db07-1265. PMC 2518482. PMID 18567823.
  16. Liu J, Xu Y, Hu Y, Wang G (2015). “The role of fibroblast growth factor 21 in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and implications for therapy”. Metab. Clin. Exp. 64 (3): 380–90. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2014.11.009. PMID 25516477.

Template:WS Template:WH

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2] Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

Overview

Common causes in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is related to obesity which will result in insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Less commonly patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia are also associated with developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Causes

  • Less common causes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease include hypertension and dyslipidemia.
  • The risk of developing MASLD and progressing to MASH increases with the number of metabolic syndrome features, including abdominal obesity, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol, and elevated blood glucose.[4] Cardiometabolic risk factors used in the classification of MASLD include body mass index of 25 or greater, or 23 or greater in Asian individuals; waist circumference of 80 cm or greater in women and 94 cm or greater in men; fasting glucose level of 5.6 mmol/L or greater, 2-hour postload glucose level of 7.8 mmol/L or greater, hemoglobin A1c level of 5.7% or greater, established type 2 diabetes, or use of glucose-lowering medication; blood pressure of 130/85 mm Hg or greater or use of antihypertensive medication; plasma triglyceride level of 1.70 mmol/L or greater or use of triglyceride-lowering medication; and low HDL cholesterol.
  • Other contributors include older age, male sex, postmenopausal status, PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 genetic variants, sedentary lifestyle, smoking, high fructose intake, alcohol consumption above MASLD thresholds, and high-calorie diets rich in saturated fats, sugars, and processed foods.
  • Other known causes of hepatic steatosis that should be excluded include use of corticosteroids, methotrexate, or tamoxifen; hepatitis C virus infection; iron overload; celiac disease; HIV infection; malnutrition; Wilson disease; lysosomal acid lipase deficiency; hypobetalipoproteinemia; and inborn errors of metabolism.

Secondary NAFLD

Secondary non-alcoholic fatty liver disease can also be defined as injury to liver caused by either medications, surgery and other diseases.

References

  1. “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease”.
  2. “Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease”.
  3. “Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease & NASH | NIDDK”.
  4. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).


Differentiating Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2] Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

Overview

Usually, NAFLD presents with no or few symptoms but if symptomatic NAFLD must be differentiated from other diseases that cause jaundice and abdominal pain which include Wilson’s disease, hemochromatosis, alcoholic hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice.

Differential Diagnosis

NAFLD must be differentiated from other diseases that cause jaundice and abdominal pain like including alcohol-associated liver disease, metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related liver disease, drug-induced liver injury, hepatitis C virus infection, iron overload, celiac disease, HIV infection, malnutrition, Wilson disease, lysosomal acid lipase deficiency, hypobetalipoproteinemia, and inborn errors of metabolism.[1][2]

Classification of jaundice based on etiology Disease History and clinical manifestations Diagnosis
Lab Findings Other blood tests Other diagnostic
Family history Fever RUQ Pain Pruritis AST ALT ALK BLR Indirect BLR Direct Viral serology
Jaundice Hepatocellular Jaundice Hemochromatosis + -/+ ↑/N ↑/N N Ferritin ↑ Liver biopsy
Wilson’s disease + -/+ N ↑/N N Serum cerulloplasmin ↑ Liver biopsy
Alcoholic hepatitis -/+ -/+ ↑↑ N ↑/N N
Cirrhosis -/+ -/+ -/+ ↑/N ↑/N ↑/N -/+ Low platate Small liver on ultrasond
Cholestatic Jaundice Common bile duct stone -/+ + + N N N Dilated ducts on sono CT/ERCP
Hepatitis A cholestatic type -/+ + + N N N + HAV- AB Abdominal ultrasound
EBV / CMV hepatitis -/+ + + N N N + Positive serology
Primary biliary cirrhosis -/+ -/+ + N/↑ N/↑ N AMA positive Liver biopsy
Primary sclerosing cholangitis -/+ -/+ + N/↑ N/↑ N Beading on MRCP Liver biopsy
Pancreatic carcinoma + -/+ N/↑ N/↑ N Mass on ultrasond CT scan for diagnosis

Abbreviations: RUQ= Right upper quadrant of the abdomen, LUQ= Left upper quadrant, LLQ= Left lower quadrant, RLQ= Right lower quadrant, LFT= Liver function test, SIRS= Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ERCP= Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, IV= Intravenous, N= Normal, AMA= Anti mitochondrial antibodies, LDH= Lactate dehydrogenase, GI= Gastrointestinal, CXR= Chest X ray, IgA= Immunoglobulin A, IgG= Immunoglobulin G, IgM= Immunoglobulin M, CT= Computed tomography, PMN= Polymorphonuclear cells, ESR= Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP= C-reactive protein, TS= Transferrin saturation, SF= Serum Ferritin, SMA= Superior mesenteric artery, SMV= Superior mesenteric vein, ECG= Electrocardiogram

Disease Clinical manifestations Diagnosis Comments
Symptoms Signs
Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging
Acute suppurative cholangitis RUQ + + + + + + + N
  • Abnormal LFT
  • WBC >10,000
  • Ultrasound shows biliary dilatation/stents/tumor
  • Septic shock occurs with features of SIRS
Acute cholangitis RUQ + + N
  • Ultrasound shows biliary dilatation/stents/tumor
  • Biliary drainage (ERCP) + IV antibiotics
Acute cholecystitis RUQ + + + Hypoactive Ultrasound shows:
  • Gallstone
  • Inflammation
Acute pancreatitis Epigastric + + ± ± N
  • Ultrasound shows evidence of inflammation
  • CT scan shows severity of pancreatitis
  • Pain radiation to back
Chronic pancreatitis Epigastric ± ± + + N
  • Increased amylase / lipase
  • Increased stool fat content
  • Pancreatic function test
CT scan
  • Calcification
  • Pseudocyst
  • Dilation of main pancreatic duct
  • Predisposes to pancreatic cancer
Pancreatic carcinoma Epigastric + + + + N

Skin manifestations may include:

Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Primary biliary cirrhosis RUQ/Epigastric + N
  • Increased AMA level, abnormal LFTs
  • ERCP
  • Pruritis
Primary sclerosing cholangitis RUQ + + N ERCP and MRCP shows
  • Multiple segmental strictures
  • Mural irregularities
  • Biliary dilatation and diverticula
  • Distortion of biliary tree
  • The risk of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis is 400 times higher than the risk in the general population.
Cholelithiasis RUQ/Epigastric ± ± ± Normal to hyperactive for dislodged stone
  • Fatty food intolerance
Gastrointestinal perforation Diffuse + ± ± + + + ± Hyperactive/hypoactive
  • WBC> 10,000
Inflammatory bowel disease Diffuse ± ± + + + Normal or hyperactive

Extra intestinal findings:

Whipple’s disease Diffuse ± ± + + ± N Endoscopy is used to confirm diagnosis.

Images used to find complications

Extra intestinal findings:
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Viral hepatitis RUQ + + + Positive in Hep A and E + Positive in fulminant hepatitis Positive in acute + N
  • Abnormal LFTs
  • Viral serology
  • US
  • Hep A and E have fecal-oral route of transmission
  • Hep B and C transmits via blood transfusion and sexual contact.
Liver abscess RUQ + + + + ± + + + ± Normal or hypoactive
  • US
  • CT
Hepatocellular carcinoma/Metastasis RUQ + + +
  • Normal
  • Hyperactive if obstruction present
  • US
  • CT
  • Liver biopsy

Other symptoms:

Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Budd-Chiari syndrome RUQ ± ± Positive in liver failure leading to varices N
Findings on CT scan suggestive of Budd-Chiari syndrome include:
Ascitic fluid examination shows:
Cirrhosis RUQ + + + + N US
  • Stigmata of liver disease
  • Cruveilhier- Baumgarten murmur
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Diffuse + Positive in cirrhotic patients + ± + + Hypoactive
  • Ascitic fluid PMN>250 cells/mm³
  • Culture: Positive for single organism
  • Ultrasound for evaluation of liver cirrhosis
Biliary colic RUQ + + N
  • Ultrasound

References

  1. Abd El-Kader SM, El-Den Ashmawy EM (2015). “Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: The diagnosis and management”. World J Hepatol. 7 (6): 846–58. doi:10.4254/wjh.v7.i6.846. PMC 4411527. PMID 25937862.
  2. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).
Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2] Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

Overview

The estimated annual incidence of non alcoholic liver disease with steatosis in the United States is approximately 9,255 per 100,000 individuals. The prevalence of non-alcoholic liver disease in the United States is estimated to be 10,000 to 24,000 cases per 100,000 individuals annually. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease may occur at any age, but is diagnosed most commonly in patients aged 50 to 60 years. Hepatic steatosis is more prevalent in the hispanics.

One estimate of prevalence is 30% from a systematic review[1]. A similar estimate comes from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 study[2].

Epidemiology

Incidence

  • The estimated annual incidence of non alcoholic liver disease with steatosis in the United States is approximately 9,255 per 100,000 individuals.
  • The estimated annual incidence of non alcoholic liver disease with steatohepatitis in the United States is approximately 265 per 100,000 individuals .
  • About 1/3 of america population is expected to have non alcoholic fatty liver disease.[3][4][5][6][7]

Prevalance

  • MASLD is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. Approximately 30% to 40% of adults worldwide have MASLD. The prevalence is substantially higher among individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity, affecting approximately 60% to 70% of individuals with type 2 diabetes and approximately 70% to 80% of individuals with obesity.[8]
  • In a systematic review of 92 population-based studies from 1990 to 2019, the highest prevalence of ultrasound-detected MASLD was observed in Latin America and the lowest in Western Europe. By 2040, the global prevalence of MASLD among adults is projected to exceed 55%. In 2021, the global age-standardized prevalence of MASLD was 15,018 per 100,000 population, and the annual incidence was 608 per 100,000 population. The prevalence was higher in men than women and peaked at 45 to 49 years of age in men and 50 to 54 years of age in women.
  • Among individuals with type 2 diabetes, the global pooled prevalence of MASLD based on ultrasonography was 65.3%. Among individuals with type 2 diabetes who had liver biopsy data, the global histological prevalence of MASH was 66.4%, stage F2 fibrosis was present in 40.8%, and advanced fibrosis, defined as stage F3 or F4, was present in 15.5%.
  • The prevalence of non-alcoholic liver disease in the United States is estimated to be 10,000 to 24,000 cases per 100,000 individuals annually.
  • In obese children the prevalence of non-alcoholic liver disease is estimated to be 20,000 to 50,000 cases per 100,000 individuals annually.[9]
  • Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease increases nearly five fold in obese individuals.

Demographics

Age

  • Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease may occur at any age, but is diagnosed most commonly in patients aged 50 to 60 years.

Gender

  • Men are more commonly affected by non-alcoholic liver disease than women. In global 2021 estimates, prevalence peaked at 45 to 49 years of age in men and at 50 to 54 years of age in women.
  • Among women it is more common in post-menopausal women than pre-menopausal.

Race

  • Hepatic steatosis is more prevalent in the hispanics (45%) race and followed by caucasians (42% of men, 24% of women) and african-american (24%)

References

  1. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, Paik JM, Henry A, Van Dongen C, Henry L (2023). “The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a systematic review”. Hepatology. 77 (4): 1335–1347. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000004. PMC 10026948 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 36626630 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. Paik JM, Henry L, Younossi Y, Ong J, Alqahtani S, Younossi ZM (2023). “The burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rapidly growing in every region of the world from 1990 to 2019”. Hepatol Commun. 7 (10). doi:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000251. PMC 10545420 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 37782469 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. Bellentani S, Scaglioni F, Marino M, Bedogni G (2010). “Epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease”. Dig Dis. 28 (1): 155–61. doi:10.1159/000282080. PMID 20460905.
  4. Masarone M, Federico A, Abenavoli L, Loguercio C, Persico M (2014). “Non alcoholic fatty liver: epidemiology and natural history”. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 9 (3): 126–33. PMID 25514916.
  5. Le MH, Devaki P, Ha NB, Jun DW, Te HS, Cheung RC; et al. (2017). “Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk factors for advanced fibrosis and mortality in the United States”. PLoS One. 12 (3): e0173499. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173499. PMC 5367688. PMID 28346543.
  6. Fan JG, Farrell GC (2009). “Epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in China”. J Hepatol. 50 (1): 204–10. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.010. PMID 19014878.
  7. Vizuete J, Camero A, Malakouti M, Garapati K, Gutierrez J (2017). “Perspectives on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Overview of Present and Future Therapies”. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 5 (1): 67–75. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00061. PMC 5411359. PMID 28507929.
  8. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).
  9. Vizuete J, Camero A, Malakouti M, Garapati K, Gutierrez J (2017). “Perspectives on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Overview of Present and Future Therapies”. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 5 (1): 67–75. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00061. PMC 5411359. PMID 28507929.

Template:WS Template:WH

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2] Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

Overview

The most potent risk factor in the development of NAFLD is obesity. Other risk factors include insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.

Risk Factors

Risk factors in the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease include:[1][2][3][4]


Cardiometabolic risk factors used in the classification of MASLD include body mass index of 25 or greater, or 23 or greater in Asian individuals; waist circumference of 80 cm or greater in women and 94 cm or greater in men; fasting glucose level of 5.6 mmol/L or greater, 2-hour postload glucose level of 7.8 mmol/L or greater, hemoglobin A1c level of 5.7% or greater, established type 2 diabetes, or use of glucose-lowering medication; blood pressure of 130/85 mm Hg or greater or use of antihypertensive medication; plasma triglyceride level of 1.70 mmol/L or greater or use of triglyceride-lowering medication; and low HDL cholesterol.

References

  1. Streba LA, Vere CC, Rogoveanu I, Streba CT (2015). “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, metabolic risk factors, and hepatocellular carcinoma: an open question”. World J Gastroenterol. 21 (14): 4103–10. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4103. PMC 4394070. PMID 25892859.
  2. He S, Bao W, Shao M, Wang W, Wang C, Sun J; et al. (2011). “Risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a Chinese population”. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 74 (4): 503–8. PMID 22319959.
  3. Streba LA, Vere CC, Rogoveanu I, Streba CT (2015). “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, metabolic risk factors, and hepatocellular carcinoma: an open question”. World J. Gastroenterol. 21 (14): 4103–10. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4103. PMC 4394070. PMID 25892859.
  4. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).

Template:WS Template:WH

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2]Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

Overview

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for NAFLD in general population. However, screening is recommended in high-risk population groups(obesity, insulin resistance and patients with metabolic syndrome) as more than 50 million Americans have been estimated to have metabolic syndrome and about 80% of them have NAFD.

Screening

  • There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for NAFLD in general population.[1][2][3]
  • However, American Gastroenterological Association Technical Review recommends screening for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in population at high risk such as obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome.
  • Screening is however complicated by the lack of accurate, noninvasive diagnostic tools for NAFLD and the lack of clear treatment that can be proposed to the patient.
  • Current guidelines summarized in the JAMA review[4] recommend a 2-tier testing approach to screen for advanced liver fibrosis in high-risk populations, including individuals with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes, obesity, 2 or more cardiometabolic risk factors, imaging-detected hepatic steatosis, or persistently elevated serum aminotransferase levels.
    • The first step is calculation of the Fibrosis-4 index, usually performed in primary care. Patients with a Fibrosis-4 index greater than 1.3 should undergo vibration-controlled transient elastography or another noninvasive test, such as the enhanced liver fibrosis test. Patients with liver stiffness greater than 8.0 kPa or an enhanced liver fibrosis test score greater than 9.8 should be referred to a hepatologist.
    • Patients with a FIB-4 score less than 1.3 should undergo lifestyle modification, avoidance of alcohol intake, and treatment of type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Repeat FIB-4 testing may be performed every 1 to 3 years. Patients with indeterminate or high-risk findings should undergo additional noninvasive fibrosis assessment and may require hepatology referral.
FIB-4 score Interpretation
<1.30 Low risk of advanced fibrosis
1.30-2.67 Indeterminate risk of advanced fibrosis
>2.67 High risk of advanced fibrosis

The AGA also recommends screening[5].

Workflows to promote screening may increase treatment[6].

Screening modalities

  • Serum tests of liver function

References

  1. Koot BGP, Nobili V (2017). “Screening for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: do guidelines provide enough guidance?”. Obes Rev. 18 (9): 1050–1060. doi:10.1111/obr.12556. PMID 28544608.
  2. Kummer S, Klee D, Kircheis G, Friedt M, Schaper J, Häussinger D; et al. (2017). “Screening for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional analysis”. Eur J Pediatr. 176 (4): 529–536. doi:10.1007/s00431-017-2876-1. PMID 28213828.
  3. Glen J, Floros L, Day C, Pryke R, Guideline Development Group (2016). “Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): summary of NICE guidance”. BMJ. 354: i4428. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4428. PMID 27605111.
  4. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).
  5. Wattacheril JJ, Abdelmalek MF, Lim JK, Sanyal AJ (2023). “AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Role of Noninvasive Biomarkers in the Evaluation and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Expert Review”. Gastroenterology. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.06.013. PMID 37542503 Check |pmid= value (help).
  6. Zhang X, Yip TC, Wong GL, Leow WX, Liang LY, Lim LL; et al. (2023). “Clinical care pathway to detect advanced liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes through automated fibrosis score calculation and electronic reminder messages: a randomised controlled trial”. Gut. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330269. PMID 37549979 Check |pmid= value (help).

Template:WS Template:WH

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Manpreet Kaur, MD [2] Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS[3]

Overview

If left untreated non-alcoholic fatty liver disease may progress to fibrosis and, later cirrhosis. Studies of serial liver biopsies estimate a 26-37% rate of hepatic fibrosis and 2-15% rate of cirrhosis in less than 6 years. Common complications of NAFLD include fibrosis, cirrhosis, internal bleeding, encephalopathy. The presence of fibrosis and cirrhosis associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with NAFLD.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Natural History

  • The symptoms of NAFLD usually develop in the 40th decade of life, and usually asymptomatic at first.
  • After following NAFLD patients for long-term the outcome of the disease is as follows
    • 1) Patients with NAFLD has overall high morbidity and mortality rate and the common cause of death in NAFLD patients is cardiovascular disease.
    • 2) Patients with NASH has more liver-related mortality rate
  • Approximately 15% to 40% of patients with isolated hepatic steatosis progress to MASH. Fibrosis progression is usually slow, with progression of approximately 1 fibrosis stage over 14 years among patients with isolated steatosis and approximately 1 fibrosis stage over 7 years among patients with MASH. More advanced fibrosis is the strongest risk factor for progression to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and liver-related mortality.[1]
  • In a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with histologically confirmed MASLD, 2% to 3% of patients with isolated steatosis developed advanced fibrosis over 15 to 20 years, while approximately 25% to 30% of patients with MASH developed advanced fibrosis within 8 to 10 years. Among patients with biopsy-confirmed MASH and F3 fibrosis, 22% progressed to cirrhosis over 2 years.
  • Cirrhosis is associated with hepatic decompensation events, including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding, which occur at rates of about 10% annually. Up to nearly 2.5% of patients with cirrhosis develop incident hepatocellular carcinoma annually.
  • If left untreated, patients with NAFLD may progress to develop hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC). But it is directly propotional to the degree of fibrosis and advanced cirrhosis
  • Children who are positive with NAFLD are also prone to short lifespan when compared to general population.[2]

Patients progress about 1 stage per 7 years[3].

NAFLD with normal liver enzymes

Two cohort studies suggest no increased risk of cirrhosis among patients with steatosis by imaging but normal liver transaminases”

  • NAFLD with normal liver enzyme levels (n = 41,461) after 6 years of monitoring.[4]
  • NAFLD with normal liver enzyme levels (n = 3,522) after 8 years of monitoring[5].

NAFLD with high FIB-4

In a cohort study of uncertain duration, 8% of patients had a high FIB-4 and 3% had one of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation[6].

NAFLD and fatty liver index

The fatty liver index (FLI) is based on the following findings from a cohort study[7]:

Parameters of the fatty liver index[7]
Parameter Regression coefficient]
Loge (triglycerides, mg*dL-1) 0.953
BMI (kg*m2-1) 0.139
Loge (GGT, U*L-1) 0.718
Waist circumference (cm) 0.053
Constant -15.745

This leads to the equation: FLI = (e 0.953*loge (triglycerides) + 0.139*BMI + 0.718*loge (ggt) + 0.053*waist circumference – 15.745) / (1 + e 0.953*loge (triglycerides) + 0.139*BMI + 0.718*loge (ggt) + 0.053*waist circumference – 15.745) * 100

Or the equation may be expressed as:

  • ey / (1 + ey) × 100
  • Note that in both the numerator and denominator the exponent is: y = 0.953 × ln(triglycerides, mg/dL) + 0.139 × BMI + 0.718 × ln (GGT, U/L) + 0.053 × waist circumference, cm – 15.745

This equation has been used to prognosticate[8].

Online calculators are available:

  • Diagnosis of fatty liver. MDCALC
  • Distinguishing alchoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, Mayo Clinic

NAFLD with any fibrosis

The NIH Cohort found that any state of Fibrosis increases overall mortality or liver transplantation[9].

NAFLD imaging

Elastography can help determine prognosis[10].

Complications

  • Other complications of MASLD include hepatocellular carcinoma, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, incident type 2 diabetes, and certain extrahepatic cancers.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, especially if with cirrhosis, may be associated with thrombocytopenia[13][14].

Prognosis

  • Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with noncirrhotic MASLD, followed by extrahepatic cancer and liver-related complications. In patients with MASLD-related cirrhosis, liver-related and cardiovascular disease-related deaths are the predominant causes of mortality.[15]
  • In a cohort study of patient who had biopsy-proven NAFLD, 6% developed death, hepatocellular carcinoma, or death with 5 years[16].

In a cohort of patients with steatosis by imaging but did not have liver biopsies, after 8 years of follow-up, liver function tests predicted clinical outcomes only if LFTs abnormal[5].

  • The rate of ESLD (fibrosis stage 3/4 with symptoms) among patients with fibrosis stage 1/2 over 20 years is per Nasr et al[17]:
    • 11% (6 of 53) (Supplementary table 1)
    • 25% (4 of 16) (Supplementary table 1)
  • Histology is the most reliable means to grade the severity of the disease and thus estimate prognosis.
    • Fibrosis stage is the strongest prognostic factor for liver-related morbidity and mortality. Compared with patients with no fibrosis, patients with cirrhosis have substantially higher risks of liver-related events, liver-related mortality, liver transplantation, and all-cause mortality.
    • The presence of fibrosis and cirrhosis is associated with a particularly poor prognosis among patients with NAFLD. [18]
    • Depending on the extent of the fibrosis and cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis, the prognosis may vary.[19]

A simulation study has estimated prognoses[20]

Prognosis estimated based on treatment

Randomized controlled trials have been executed of:

  • Semaglutide[21]:
    • “An improvement in fibrosis stage occurred in 43% of the patients in the 0.4-mg group and in 33% of the patients in the placebo group (P=0.48)” over 6 years of treatment.

Assuming that

  • The 14% improvement above found be Newsome et al[21] would be significant in larger trials
  • An improvement in fibrosis state has the same clinical significance as regression from advanced fibrosis (stage 3 or 4) to non-advanced fibrosis (Stage 1 or 2)

The reduction in progression to end-stage liver disease (ESLD; fibrosis stage 3 or 4 with symptoms) by treating is 1.4% over twenty years. The estimate is based on:

10% (the absolute reduction in advanced fibrosis due to treatment according to Newsome et al[21])
 x 
14% (approximate absolute increase in risk of ESLD from fibrosis 3/4 versus fibrosis 1/2 per Nasr et al[17])

Thus, the number needed to treat (NNT) is about 70 (100/1.4).

References

  1. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. Calzadilla Bertot L, Adams LA (2016). “The Natural Course of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease”. Int J Mol Sci. 17 (5). doi:10.3390/ijms17050774. PMC 4881593. PMID 27213358.
  3. Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Loomba R (2015). “Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13 (4): 643-54.e1-9, quiz e39-40. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.014. PMC 4208976. PMID 24768810.
  4. Huang YH, Chan C, Lee HW, Huang C, Chen YJ, Liu PC; et al. (2023). “Influence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease With Increased Liver Enzyme Levels on the Risk of Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 21 (4): 960–969.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.046. PMC 9349477 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 35124270 Check |pmid= value (help).
  5. 5.0 5.1 Natarajan Y, Kramer JR, Yu X, Li L, Thrift AP, El-Serag HB; et al. (2020). “Risk of Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Cancer in Patients With NAFLD and Normal Liver Enzymes”. Hepatology. 72 (4): 1242–1252. doi:10.1002/hep.31157. PMC 8318072 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 32022277 Check |pmid= value (help).
  6. Schreiner AD, Zhang J, Moran WP, Koch DG, Livingston S, Bays C; et al. (2023). “Real-World Primary Care Data Comparing ALT and FIB-4 in Predicting Future Severe Liver Disease Outcomes”. J Gen Intern Med. 38 (11): 2453–2460. doi:10.1007/s11606-023-08093-8. PMID 36814048 Check |pmid= value (help).
  7. 7.0 7.1 Bedogni G, Bellentani S, Miglioli L, Masutti F, Passalacqua M, Castiglione A; et al. (2006). “The Fatty Liver Index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population”. BMC Gastroenterol. 6: 33. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-6-33. PMC 1636651. PMID 17081293.
  8. Kim KS, Hong S, Han K, Park CY (2024). “Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with cardiovascular disease and all cause death in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: nationwide population based study”. BMJ. 384: e076388. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-076388. PMC 10862140 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 38350680 Check |pmid= value (help).
  9. Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, Adams LA, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P; et al. (2015). “Liver Fibrosis, but No Other Histologic Features, Is Associated With Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease”. Gastroenterology. 149 (2): 389–97.e10. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.043. PMC 4516664. PMID 25935633.
  10. Lin H, Lee HW, Yip TC, Tsochatzis E, Petta S, Bugianesi E; et al. (2024). “Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography Scores to Predict Liver-Related Events in Steatotic Liver Disease”. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.1447. PMID 38512249 Check |pmid= value (help).
  11. Chacko KR, Reinus J (2016). “Extrahepatic Complications of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease”. Clin Liver Dis. 20 (2): 387–401. doi:10.1016/j.cld.2015.10.004. PMID 27063276.
  12. Vanni E, Marengo A, Mezzabotta L, Bugianesi E (2015). “Systemic Complications of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: When the Liver Is Not an Innocent Bystander”. Semin Liver Dis. 35 (3): 236–49. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1562944. PMID 26378641.
  13. Rivera-Álvarez M, Córdova-Ramírez AC, Elías-De-La-Cruz GD, Murrieta-Álvarez I, León-Peña AA, Cantero-Fortiz Y; et al. (2021). “Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and thrombocytopenia IV: its association with granulocytopenia”. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. doi:10.1016/j.htct.2021.06.004. PMID 34312112 Check |pmid= value (help).
  14. Panke CL, Tovo CV, Villela-Nogueira CA, Cravo CM, Ferreira FC, Rezende GFM; et al. (2020). “Evaluation of thrombocytopenia in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease without cirrhosis”. Ann Hepatol. 19 (1): 88–91. doi:10.1016/j.aohep.2019.05.011. PMID 31575467.
  15. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). “Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review”. JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).
  16. Mózes FE, Lee JA, Vali Y, Alzoubi O, Staufer K, Trauner M; et al. (2023). “Performance of non-invasive tests and histology for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an individual participant data meta-analysis”. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00141-3. PMID 37290471 Check |pmid= value (help).
  17. 17.0 17.1 Nasr P, Ignatova S, Kechagias S, Ekstedt M (2018). “Natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A prospective follow-up study with serial biopsies”. Hepatol Commun. 2 (2): 199–210. doi:10.1002/hep4.1134. PMC 5796332. PMID 29404527.
  18. Jepsen P, Grønbæk H (2011). “Prognosis and staging of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease”. BMJ. 343: d7302. doi:10.1136/bmj.d7302. PMID 22102440.
  19. Suman, A.; Khullar, V.; Limaye, A. (2016). “Complications of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease”. Journal of Hepatology. 64 (2): S473. doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(16)00798-4. ISSN 0168-8278.
  20. Chhatwal J, Dalgic OO, Chen W, Samur S, Bethea ED, Xiao J; et al. (2022). “Analysis of a Simulation Model to Estimate Long-term Outcomes in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease”. JAMA Netw Open. 5 (9): e2230426. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30426. PMC 9471976 Check |pmc= value (help). PMID 36098969 Check |pmid= value (help).
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 Newsome PN, Buchholtz K, Cusi K, Linder M, Okanoue T, Ratziu V; et al. (2021). “A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis”. N Engl J Med. 384 (12): 1113–1124. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2028395. PMID 33185364 Check |pmid= value (help).

Template:WS Template:WH

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies | Noninvasive scores

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

External Links
  • NIH page on Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis


Template:Gastroenterology


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH