Health Dictionary AI Health Chat Find an Online Doctor

Acute pancreatitis

For patient information, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Tarek Nafee, M.D. [2]; Iqra Qamar M.D.[3]; Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [4]; Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [5]; Synonyms and keywords: Pancreatitis, acute; acute inflammation of pancreas; acute soreness of pancreas

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2]; Monish Thuvooru Muthu Kalyanaraman, M.B.B.S[3] Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [4] Tarek Nafee, M.D. [5]

Overview

Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory injury of the pancreas that ranges from a mild, self-limited illness to necrotizing disease with persistent organ failure. The diagnosis requires at least 2 of 3 features: characteristic abdominal pain, serum lipase or amylase at least 3 times the upper limit of normal, or characteristic imaging findings; imaging is not routinely required when the clinical and biochemical criteria are already met.[1][2]

Gallstone disease and prolonged heavy alcohol exposure are the leading causes. Initial care focuses on determining the etiology, identifying patients at risk for deterioration, goal-directed intravenous hydration, analgesia, early oral or enteral nutrition, and treatment of complications. Prophylactic antibiotics, routine early CT, routine urgent ERCP in the absence of cholangitis or persistent biliary obstruction, prolonged fasting, and early open necrosectomy are not recommended.[3][4][5]

Clinical dimension Quick-glance summary
Diagnosis At least 2 of 3: characteristic pain, lipase or amylase ≥3 times the upper limit of normal, or characteristic imaging
Most common causes Gallstones and prolonged heavy alcohol exposure; evaluate triglycerides, calcium, medications, recent ERCP, structural disease, autoimmune disease, tumors, trauma, infection, and genetic susceptibility when appropriate
Severity Mild: no organ failure or local/systemic complications; moderately severe: transient organ failure and/or local or systemic complications; severe: persistent organ failure for more than 48 hours
Initial priorities Determine etiology, monitor for organ dysfunction, provide goal-directed lactated Ringer’s solution and analgesia, initiate early feeding as tolerated, and arrange cause-specific treatment
Major complications Pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis and collections, infection, hemorrhage, venous thrombosis, biliary or gastric obstruction, exocrine insufficiency, diabetes, recurrent acute pancreatitis, and chronic pancreatitis

Historical Perspective

Acute pancreatitis was established as a distinct clinicopathologic entity by Reginald H. Fitz in 1889, when he organized the clinical and postmortem findings from 53 patients and described hemorrhagic, suppurative, and gangrenous forms.[6] Subsequent advances shifted care from early operative exploration and prolonged pancreatic rest toward standardized severity classification, early nutrition, selective imaging, and delayed minimally invasive treatment of necrosis.

Year Milestone Clinical importance
1889 Fitz’s clinicopathologic description Established acute pancreatitis as a recognizable disease and described major morphologic patterns.[6]
1974 Ranson prognostic signs Introduced a structured clinical approach to early severity prediction.[7]
1992–1993 Original Atlanta Classification Standardized clinical definitions and terminology for severity and complications.[8]
2012–2013 Revised Atlanta Classification Defined early and late phases, organ-failure-based severity, interstitial edematous and necrotizing subtypes, and four standardized collection types.[1]
2010s–2020s Evidence-based supportive and step-up care Established early feeding, avoidance of indiscriminate antibiotics and ERCP, moderate rather than aggressive hydration, and delayed minimally invasive intervention for necrosis.[4][5]

Classification

Acute pancreatitis is classified by clinical phase, clinical severity, morphologic subtype, and the type of pancreatic or peripancreatic collection. The early phase usually encompasses the first week and is dominated by the systemic inflammatory response and organ dysfunction; the late phase may persist for weeks to months and is characterized by ongoing organ failure and local complications. Morphologically, acute pancreatitis is classified as interstitial edematous pancreatitis or necrotizing pancreatitis.[1]

Revised Atlanta severity Definition Typical clinical implication
Mild No organ failure and no local or systemic complications Usually self-limited, with recovery during the first week
Moderately severe Transient organ failure that resolves within 48 hours and/or local or systemic complications without persistent organ failure Requires closer monitoring and may require treatment of local complications
Severe Persistent organ failure lasting more than 48 hours; may involve one or multiple organ systems High risk of critical illness, prolonged hospitalization, and death

Local collections are classified as acute peripancreatic fluid collections, pancreatic pseudocysts, acute necrotic collections, or walled-off necrosis according to the underlying morphologic subtype, contents, encapsulation, and time from symptom onset. Organ failure is defined using the modified Marshall score; a score of at least 2 in the respiratory, renal, or cardiovascular system indicates organ failure.[1][9]

Pathophysiology

Acute pancreatitis begins when an initiating insult disrupts pancreatic acinar and ductal cell homeostasis. Sustained intracellular calcium elevation, premature digestive-enzyme activation, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired autophagy, endoplasmic-reticulum stress, ductal bicarbonate failure, lipotoxicity, and regulated cell-death pathways interact to produce local pancreatic injury.[10]

Key steps include:

  • Acinar-cell injury and intra-acinar zymogen activation
  • Mitochondrial ATP depletion and failure of calcium homeostasis
  • Impaired autophagic clearance of damaged organelles and activated enzymes
  • Acinar necrosis with release of damage-associated molecular patterns
  • Neutrophil, macrophage, complement, inflammasome, and cytokine activation
  • Endothelial injury, capillary leak, pancreatic microcirculatory failure, and thrombosis
  • Progression from local inflammation to systemic inflammatory response syndrome, shock, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, and multiorgan failure

Gallstone obstruction, alcohol toxicity, hypertriglyceridemia-related lipotoxicity, hypercalcemia, ductal obstruction, medications, and genetic variants initiate injury through partly distinct upstream pathways but converge on common inflammatory and cell-death mechanisms.

Causes

Acute pancreatitis is most commonly caused by gallstones or prolonged heavy alcohol exposure, but a systematic etiologic evaluation is required because prevention of recurrence depends on correcting the underlying cause.[11]

Etiologic category Examples Important clinical points
Biliary Gallstones, biliary sludge, microlithiasis The most common cause; evaluate with transabdominal ultrasound and liver biochemical tests
Alcohol associated Prolonged heavy alcohol exposure, often with tobacco and genetic cofactors Alcohol should not be assigned as the cause solely because a patient reports moderate use; alternative etiologies still require evaluation
Metabolic Severe hypertriglyceridemia, hypercalcemia A triglyceride level above 1,000 mg/dL is strongly suggestive when gallstones and alcohol are absent; identify the cause of hypercalcemia
Iatrogenic or traumatic Post-ERCP pancreatitis, abdominal trauma, postoperative or ischemic injury Timing and procedural or injury history are central to diagnosis
Drug induced Selected medications with a credible temporal relationship and published evidence A diagnosis of exclusion; review latency, competing causes, and improvement after withdrawal rather than relying on an uncritical medication list
Autoimmune Type 1 IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis, type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis Often has characteristic imaging or systemic features; autoimmune pancreatitis more often presents as a chronic or mass-forming process but can mimic acute pancreatitis
Obstructive or anatomic Pancreas divisum, ampullary or pancreatic tumor, ductal stricture, choledochocele Consider particularly in recurrent disease or in patients older than 40 years with otherwise unexplained pancreatitis
Genetic Pathogenic or susceptibility variants involving PRSS1, SPINK1, CFTR, CTRC, CPA1, and other genes Consider in early-onset, recurrent, familial, or otherwise unexplained pancreatitis
Infectious and other uncommon causes Selected viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infections; vascular and systemic inflammatory disorders Require compatible clinical context; avoid attributing nonspecific enzyme elevation to pancreatitis without meeting diagnostic criteria
Idiopathic No cause identified after standard evaluation Repeat ultrasound, MRI/MRCP, and/or endoscopic ultrasound can reveal occult biliary, ductal, or neoplastic disease

Differentiating Acute Pancreatitis from other Conditions

Acute pancreatitis should be differentiated from other causes of acute epigastric or upper abdominal pain, systemic inflammation, and elevated pancreatic enzymes. Lipase elevation is not specific when the clinical presentation is discordant, and myocardial, vascular, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, renal, metabolic, and pulmonary emergencies must not be missed.

Condition Features that favor the alternative diagnosis
Acute cholecystitis or acute cholangitis Right upper-quadrant predominance, sonographic gallbladder inflammation, jaundice, cholestatic laboratory pattern, or biliary sepsis; these disorders may coexist with biliary pancreatitis
Perforated peptic ulcer Sudden severe pain, peritoneal signs, and free intraperitoneal air
Mesenteric ischemia Pain out of proportion to examination, vascular risk factors, elevated lactate, and vascular or bowel abnormalities on CT angiography
Bowel obstruction Colicky pain, obstipation, marked distension, transition point, and dilated bowel loops
Acute coronary syndrome or pericarditis Ischemic or positional symptoms, diagnostic ECG changes, and a compatible troponin pattern
Aortic aneurysm, dissection, or other vascular catastrophe Abrupt pain, pulse or blood-pressure asymmetry, hemodynamic instability, and diagnostic vascular imaging
Diabetic ketoacidosis Hyperglycemia, anion-gap metabolic acidosis, ketosis, and improvement with metabolic treatment; lipase may be elevated without pancreatitis
Renal colic or pyelonephritis Flank-predominant pain, hematuria or pyuria, urinary symptoms, and urinary-tract imaging findings
Lower-lobe pneumonia or pulmonary embolism Respiratory symptoms, hypoxemia, pleuritic pain, and diagnostic chest or pulmonary vascular imaging

Epidemiology and Demographics

Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common gastrointestinal causes of acute hospitalization, and its incidence has increased globally over recent decades.[12]

  • In 2021, an estimated 2.75 million cases and 122,420 deaths occurred worldwide, with substantial geographic and socioeconomic variation.[13]
  • Reported incidence in high-income countries is approximately 34 cases per 100,000 person-years, although estimates vary by case definition, population, and etiology.[9]
  • The United States records approximately 300,000 hospital admissions for acute pancreatitis each year, with substantial health-care utilization and cost.[2]
  • Gallstone-related disease becomes more common with increasing age and is more frequent among women in many populations; alcohol-associated disease is more frequent among men, although these patterns vary.
  • Obesity, metabolic disease, alcohol exposure, tobacco use, medication patterns, access to care, and diagnostic practices contribute to temporal and geographic variation.
  • Racial and ethnic differences reported in United States cohorts should be interpreted in the context of structural inequities, comorbidities, environmental exposures, and access to timely care rather than as evidence of biologic racial causation.[4]

Risk Factors

Acute pancreatitis is more likely to occur in patients with gallstones, prolonged heavy alcohol exposure, tobacco use, severe hypertriglyceridemia, hypercalcemia, obesity or metabolic syndrome, selected medication exposures, recent ERCP, structural pancreaticobiliary disease, or genetic susceptibility.

Risk factors for a more severe course include:

  • Persistent systemic inflammatory response syndrome
  • Older age, frailty, and clinically important comorbidities
  • Obesity
  • Altered mental status
  • High or rising blood urea nitrogen and hematocrit
  • Pleural effusion, pulmonary infiltrates, and extensive extrapancreatic collections
  • Early or evolving respiratory, renal, or cardiovascular dysfunction[2]

Risk factors for recurrence or progression to chronic pancreatitis include an untreated biliary cause, continued heavy alcohol exposure, tobacco smoking, severe hypertriglyceridemia, genetic susceptibility, structural ductal disease, and a prior necrotizing or recurrent episode.[4]

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Acute pancreatitis is mild and self-limited in approximately 80% of patients, but a minority develop transient or persistent organ failure, necrosis, infection, or other local complications.[14]

The clinical course is often biphasic:

  • Early phase: Systemic inflammation, capillary leak, and organ failure drive morbidity and early deaths. Morphologic changes may still be evolving, so early CT can underestimate necrosis.
  • Late phase: Persistent organ failure and local complications become dominant. Infected necrosis often becomes clinically apparent after the first 1–2 weeks, although the timing varies.[15][16]

Major complications include:

  • Acute peripancreatic fluid collection, acute necrotic collection, pseudocyst, and walled-off necrosis
  • Sterile or infected pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis
  • Acute respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, shock, and multiorgan failure
  • Splanchnic venous thrombosis, pseudoaneurysm, hemorrhage, and bowel ischemia or fistula
  • Biliary, gastric-outlet, or intestinal obstruction
  • Abdominal compartment syndrome
  • Pancreatic duct disruption and disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome
  • Malnutrition, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, and pancreatogenic diabetes
  • Recurrent acute pancreatitis and progression to chronic pancreatitis

Overall mortality is approximately 1–2%, but it rises substantially with persistent organ failure and infected necrosis.[17] Recurrent acute pancreatitis develops in a clinically important minority of patients, and approximately 10% progress to chronic pancreatitis after a first episode, with a markedly greater risk after recurrent episodes.[18][4] Unexplained acute pancreatitis, particularly in a patient older than 40 years, should prompt consideration of an occult pancreatic tumor.

Diagnosis

Acute pancreatitis is diagnosed when at least 2 of the following 3 criteria are present:

  • Characteristic acute upper abdominal pain
  • Serum lipase and/or amylase at least 3 times the upper limit of normal
  • Characteristic findings on cross-sectional imaging[1]

When characteristic pain and enzyme elevation are both present, CT is generally unnecessary solely to establish the diagnosis. Diagnostic evaluation should simultaneously identify the etiology and detect organ dysfunction or complications.

History and Symptoms

Acute pancreatitis typically presents with acute, persistent epigastric or upper abdominal pain that often radiates to the back and may be accompanied by nausea and vomiting.

Important history includes:

  • Onset, severity, character, radiation, and progression of pain
  • Nausea, vomiting, inability to tolerate oral intake, fever, dyspnea, oliguria, confusion, or syncope
  • Prior pancreatitis, gallstones, biliary colic, jaundice, or cholecystectomy
  • Amount and duration of alcohol use and tobacco exposure
  • Recent ERCP, abdominal trauma, surgery, or ischemic event
  • New or recently changed medications
  • Hypertriglyceridemia, hypercalcemia, autoimmune disease, infection, or malignancy
  • Family history and age at first episode, particularly in recurrent or early-onset disease

Physical Examination

Acute pancreatitis most commonly causes epigastric tenderness, which may be accompanied by guarding, abdominal distension, or decreased bowel sounds from ileus.

Examination should assess:

  • Temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, mental status, and urine output
  • Volume depletion, capillary refill, and peripheral perfusion
  • Peritoneal signs suggesting severe inflammation or an alternative surgical emergency
  • Jaundice or right upper-quadrant findings suggesting biliary obstruction or cholangitis
  • Respiratory distress, pleural effusion, or pulmonary edema
  • Rare flank or periumbilical ecchymosis; Grey Turner and Cullen signs indicate retroperitoneal or intraperitoneal bleeding but are neither sensitive nor specific

Laboratory Findings

Acute pancreatitis is supported by a serum lipase or amylase concentration at least 3 times the upper limit of normal. Lipase is preferred because it remains elevated longer and performs better in delayed presentation, alcohol-associated pancreatitis, and hypertriglyceridemia-associated pancreatitis; the magnitude of elevation does not reliably indicate severity.[2][4]

Additional studies should be selected to determine etiology and assess severity:

  • Complete blood count, electrolytes, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, liver biochemical tests, calcium, and triglycerides
  • Arterial or venous blood gas and lactate when shock, respiratory failure, or severe metabolic derangement is suspected
  • C-reactive protein as a delayed inflammatory marker; it is not required to establish the diagnosis
  • Blood cultures when sepsis, cholangitis, or infected necrosis is suspected
  • Immunoglobulin G4 only when the clinical and imaging pattern suggests type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis

Electrocardiogram

Acute pancreatitis has no diagnostic electrocardiographic pattern. An ECG and cardiac biomarkers should be obtained when the presentation could represent acute coronary syndrome; nonspecific ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities may occur during acute pancreatitis and should not be assumed benign without appropriate clinical evaluation.

Chest X Ray

Acute pancreatitis has no specific diagnostic chest radiograph finding. Chest radiography may demonstrate a left-sided or bilateral pleural effusion, basilar atelectasis, pulmonary infiltrates, or acute respiratory distress syndrome and can help identify alternative diagnoses such as pneumonia or perforated viscus.

CT Scan

Acute pancreatitis may be characterized on contrast-enhanced CT by pancreatic enlargement, altered or absent pancreatic enhancement, peripancreatic inflammatory change, fluid collections, and local vascular or gastrointestinal complications. CT should be reserved for diagnostic uncertainty, failure to improve or clinical deterioration after approximately 48–72 hours, suspected necrosis or another complication, or procedural planning; CT performed during the first 24–48 hours may underestimate evolving necrosis.[19][2]

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Acute pancreatitis should generally be evaluated with transabdominal ultrasound to identify gallstones, biliary sludge, and common bile duct dilation, although bowel gas frequently limits visualization of the pancreas. Repeat ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, or MRI/MRCP may identify occult microlithiasis, choledocholithiasis, structural disease, or small tumors in otherwise unexplained pancreatitis.[2][5]

Other Imaging Findings

Acute pancreatitis can be further evaluated with MRI/MRCP when CT is contraindicated or when ductal, biliary, or collection characterization is required. Secretin-enhanced MRCP and endoscopic ultrasound are especially useful in selected patients with recurrent or idiopathic disease. ERCP is primarily therapeutic rather than a routine diagnostic test and should not be performed solely to confirm acute pancreatitis.

Test Principal role Main limitation or caution
Serum lipase Supports diagnosis when ≥3 times the upper limit of normal Elevation is not fully specific, and the degree of elevation does not grade severity
Transabdominal ultrasound First-line assessment for gallstones and biliary dilation Limited pancreatic visualization because of bowel gas and body habitus
Contrast-enhanced CT Evaluates uncertain diagnosis, necrosis, collections, vascular complications, deterioration, and procedural anatomy Routine early CT adds radiation and contrast exposure and may underestimate early necrosis
MRI/MRCP Characterizes ducts, biliary disease, necrosis, and collections without ionizing radiation Longer examination, reduced availability, and less suitability for some unstable patients
Endoscopic ultrasound Detects microlithiasis, small common bile duct stones, small tumors, and subtle structural causes Invasive and operator dependent; generally used after the acute presentation or when standard evaluation is unrevealing
ERCP Therapeutic biliary decompression in cholangitis or selected cases of persistent obstruction Can cause or worsen pancreatitis and is not a routine diagnostic test

Treatment

Acute pancreatitis is treated with early supportive care, close reassessment for organ dysfunction, cause-specific therapy, and selective intervention for biliary disease, infected necrosis, symptomatic collections, or other complications.

Medical Therapy

Acute pancreatitis requires individualized fluid therapy, analgesia, nutrition, and organ support rather than a disease-specific medication for the inflammatory process.

  • Monitoring: Reassess vital signs, urine output, mental status, oxygenation, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and hematocrit frequently during the first 6–24 hours; admit high-risk patients to a monitored or intensive-care setting.
  • Fluids: Use goal-directed, moderately aggressive crystalloid resuscitation, with lactated Ringer’s solution generally preferred. Avoid fixed aggressive hydration, particularly in patients with cardiac or renal disease. The WATERFALL trial found more fluid overload without improved outcomes from aggressive compared with moderate resuscitation.[20]
  • Analgesia and antiemetics: Provide adequate pain and nausea control; opioid analgesia may be used when clinically appropriate.
  • Nutrition: Begin a low-fat solid oral diet within 24–48 hours as tolerated. If oral intake is not tolerated, use enteral rather than parenteral nutrition; nasogastric feeding is generally acceptable.[21]
  • Antibiotics: Do not administer prophylactic antibiotics for predicted severe disease or sterile necrosis. Give therapeutic antibiotics for cholangitis, infected necrosis, or another proven or strongly suspected infection.
  • Organ support: Treat hypoxemia, shock, acute kidney injury, electrolyte abnormalities, hyperglycemia, and other organ dysfunction according to critical-care principles.

Surgery

Acute pancreatitis rarely requires immediate open surgery; endoscopic, radiologic, laparoscopic, and minimally invasive surgical procedures are selected according to etiology, complications, and timing.

  • ERCP: Perform urgent ERCP for acute biliary pancreatitis complicated by cholangitis. In the absence of cholangitis, routine urgent ERCP is not recommended; persistent common bile duct obstruction requires individualized evaluation.
  • Cholecystectomy: Perform same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis when the patient is fit for surgery. In necrotizing pancreatitis, delay cholecystectomy until inflammation and collections have resolved or stabilized. A 2026 nationwide Swedish cohort found recurrent pancreatitis in 3.4% after index-admission cholecystectomy, 4.9% after ERCP alone, and 17.5% after no index intervention; other gallstone complications remained substantially more common after ERCP alone than after cholecystectomy.[22]
  • Necrosis and collections: Observe asymptomatic sterile necrosis and collections. Intervene for infected necrosis or persistent symptoms and complications such as obstruction, nutritional failure, fistula, bleeding, or ongoing organ dysfunction.
  • Step-up approach: When intervention is required, begin with endoscopic or percutaneous drainage and proceed to endoscopic or minimally invasive necrosectomy only if necessary. Delay intervention until the collection is walled off, usually approximately 4 weeks, when the patient’s condition permits.[23][24]

Prevention

Acute pancreatitis is not a vaccine-preventable disease, and no vaccine is applicable. Prevention depends on reducing modifiable exposures, preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis, identifying the cause of every episode, and avoiding ineffective or harmful interventions.

Prevention level Strategies
Primary Avoid prolonged heavy alcohol exposure and tobacco; treat severe hypertriglyceridemia and hypercalcemia; maintain a healthy weight; use ERCP only when indicated and apply evidence-based post-ERCP prophylaxis in appropriate patients
Secondary Determine and correct the cause after the first episode; perform same-admission cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis; stop a credible offending medication; support alcohol and smoking cessation; control triglycerides; evaluate recurrent, early-onset, familial, or idiopathic pancreatitis for structural and genetic causes
Tertiary Prevent disability from established disease by treating infected necrosis and symptomatic collections with a multidisciplinary step-up approach, supporting nutrition and rehabilitation, and screening for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, diabetes, and recurrent or chronic pancreatitis
Quaternary Avoid routine early CT when diagnostic criteria are already met, prophylactic antibiotics for sterile disease, routine urgent ERCP without cholangitis or persistent obstruction, prolonged fasting, overly aggressive fluid resuscitation, and premature open necrosectomy

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C; et al. (2013). “Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus”. Gut. 62 (1): 102–111. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG; et al. (2024). “American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 119 (3): 419–437. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645.
  3. Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD (2021). “Acute Pancreatitis: A Review”. JAMA. 325 (4): 382–390. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.20317.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Trikudanathan G, Yazici C, Evans Phillips A, Forsmark CE (2024). “Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 167 (4): 673–688. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.052.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 IAP/APA/EPC/IPC/JPS Working Group (2025). “International Association of Pancreatology Revised Guidelines on Acute Pancreatitis 2025: Supported and Endorsed by the American Pancreatic Association, European Pancreatic Club, Indian Pancreas Club, and Japan Pancreas Society”. Pancreatology. 25 (6): 770–814. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2025.04.020.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Leach SD, Gorelick FS, Modlin IM (1990). “Acute pancreatitis at its centenary: the contribution of Reginald Fitz”. Annals of Surgery. 212 (1): 109–113. doi:10.1097/00000658-199007000-00014.
  7. Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF; et al. (1974). “Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis”. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. 139 (1): 69–81.
  8. Bradley EL III (1993). “A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis: summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992”. Archives of Surgery. 128 (5): 586–590. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170122019.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Boxhoorn L, Voermans RP, Bouwense SA; et al. (2020). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The Lancet. 396 (10252): 726–734. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6.
  10. Saluja A, Dudeja V, Dawra R, Sah RP (2019). “Early intra-acinar events in pathogenesis of pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1979–1993. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.268.
  11. Wang F, Görgülü K, Algül H, Hu LH (2026). “The Role of Alcohol in Pancreatic Diseases: A Comprehensive Perspective”. Gastroenterology. 170 (2): 268–286. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.08.025.
  12. Iannuzzi JP, King JA, Leong JH; et al. (2022). “Global incidence of acute pancreatitis is increasing over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Gastroenterology. 162 (1): 122–134. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.043.
  13. Danpanichkul P, Pang Y, Diaz LA; et al. (2026). “Global, Regional, and National Disparities in the Burden of Acute Pancreatitis and Alcohol-Related Pancreatitis From 2000 to 2021”. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 101 (7): 1151–1162. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2025.06.026.
  14. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM (2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The New England Journal of Medicine. 375 (20): 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202.
  15. Oppenlander KE, Chadwick C, Carman K (2022). “Acute Pancreatitis: Rapid Evidence Review”. American Family Physician. 106 (1): 44–50.
  16. Trikudanathan G, Wolbrink DRJ, van Santvoort HC; et al. (2019). “Current concepts in severe acute and necrotizing pancreatitis: an evidence-based approach”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1994–2007. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.269.
  17. Wu BU, Banks PA (2013). “Clinical management of patients with acute pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 144 (6): 1272–1281. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.075.
  18. Strand DS, Law RJ, Yang D, Elmunzer BJ (2022). “AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Endoscopic Approach to Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: Expert Review”. Gastroenterology. 163 (4): 1107–1114. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.07.079.
  19. Porter KK, Zaheer A, Kamel IR; et al. (2019). “ACR Appropriateness Criteria Acute Pancreatitis”. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 16 (11S): S316–S330. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.017.
  20. de-Madaria E, Buxbaum JL, Maisonneuve P; et al. (2022). “Aggressive or moderate fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis”. The New England Journal of Medicine. 387 (11): 989–1000. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2202884.
  21. Crockett SD, Wani S, Gardner TB, Falck-Ytter Y, Barkun AN (2018). “American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on Initial Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 154 (4): 1096–1101. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032.
  22. Selin D, Oskarsson V, Maret-Ouda J; et al. (2026). “Cholecystectomy vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography or No Intervention After Gallstone-Related Acute Pancreatitis”. JAMA Surgery. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2026.2168.
  23. Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA (2020). “American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis”. Gastroenterology. 158 (1): 67–75.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064.
  24. Masood M, Vedamurthy A, Krishnamoorthi R; et al. (2025). “Interventional Management of Acute Pancreatitis and Its Complications”. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 14 (18): 6683. doi:10.3390/jcm14186683.
Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [2]


Overview

Dutch physician and anatomist, Nicholaes Tulp, gave the first clear description of acute pancreatitis in 1652. The first systemic analysis of acute pancreatitis was presented by Reginald Huber Fitz in 1889. During the 20th century, there were many theories about whether surgery should be the preferred initial approach to the treatment of acute pancreatitis. Hans Chiari in 1896 proposed that the basic mechanism of the disease was autodigestion of pancreas. The father of modern anatomical pathology, Giovanni Battista Morgagni, gave the first description of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Historical Perspective

The historical landmarks in the diagnostic evaluation and management of acute pancreatitis are as follows:[1] [2]

  • In the 16th century, Sylvius Franciscus de la Boe Sylvius found that the pancreas discharged a fluid that mixed with the partly digested food and bile in the intestine causing an effervescence (“effervescentia intestinalis”) which liquefied food.
  • In the 16th century, Regnier de Graaf of Delft devised novel surgical techniques to create pancreatic fistulas (center) to collect this juice for analysis.
  • In 1642, Johannes Wirsung of Padua first described the pancreatic duct and the concept of the pancreas as a secretory organ.
  • In 1652, Nicholaes Tulp of Amsterdam is credited with the first description of acute pancreatitis.
  • In 1737, Giovanni Santorini of Venice identified a second, accessory duct and was credited with primacy in the discovery of the ampulla of Vater.
  • In 1761, Giovanni Morgagni described the clinical syndrome of severe upper abdominal pain, vomiting, and collapse (acute pancreatitis). He is also credited with the earliest pathological recognition of cancer of the pancreas.
  • In 1842, Karl von Rokitansky, the premier pathologist of Vienna (Wiener Allgemeines Krankenhaus) was the first one to recognize acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis.
  • In 1887, Rugero Oddi published his observations of the structure and function of the choledochal sphincter in Archives Italiennes de Biologie that laid the basis for understanding its role in pancreatic and biliary disease.
  • In late 18th century, Reginald Fitz described 3 forms of acute pancreatitis (hemorrhagic, suppurative, and gangrenous) and proposed that fat necrosis was a sequel of severe pancreatitis
  • In late 18th century, Nicholas Senn of Chicago, not only addressed the mechanisms of acute pancreatitis but also provided rational insight into the validity of surgical techniques for its treatment.

References

  1. Pannala R, Kidd M, Modlin IM (2009). “Acute pancreatitis: a historical perspective”. Pancreas. 38 (4): 355–66. doi:10.1097/MPA.0b013e318199161c. PMID 19390402.
  2. Fitz, Reginald H. (1889). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal. 120 (8): 181–187. doi:10.1056/NEJM188902211200801. ISSN 0096-6762.


Template:WS Template:WH

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2]; Monish Thuvooru Muthu Kalyanaraman, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Acute pancreatitis may be classified according to four complementary features: clinical phase, clinical severity, morphologic subtype, and type of pancreatic or peripancreatic collection. The Revised Atlanta Classification (RAC) is the principal international framework and classifies severity as mild, moderately severe, or severe according to organ failure and local or systemic complications.[1] The Determinant-Based Classification (DBC) is an alternative four-tier system that combines organ failure with the presence and infection status of pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis.[2]

These classifications describe different aspects of the same episode and should not be used interchangeably. Etiologic classification, prediction scores such as APACHE II, BISAP, and the Ranson criteria, and imaging severity indices are addressed in their respective microchapters.

Classification axis Categories Principal clinical purpose
Clinical phase Early phase and late phase Distinguishes the predominantly systemic early response from the later course in which persistent organ failure and local complications must be described together
Clinical severity Mild, moderately severe, or severe by the RAC; mild, moderate, severe, or critical by the DBC Standardizes communication, outcome reporting, and clinical risk stratification
Morphology Interstitial edematous pancreatitis or necrotizing pancreatitis Describes the presence, location, and evolution of pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis
Local collection Acute peripancreatic fluid collection, pancreatic pseudocyst, acute necrotic collection, or walled-off necrosis Standardizes the description of collections according to pancreatitis subtype, contents, encapsulation, and time from symptom onset

Classification

Acute pancreatitis is classified below using the terminology and definitions of the Revised Atlanta Classification and the complementary Determinant-Based Classification.

Classification Based on Clinical Phase

Acute pancreatitis has two overlapping clinical phases: an early phase that usually lasts for the first week and a late phase that may continue for weeks to months.[1][3][4]

Feature Early phase Late phase
Usual timing First week after symptom onset After the first week; may persist for weeks to months
Principal driver Systemic response to pancreatic injury, including systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunction Persistent systemic inflammation, organ failure, and/or evolving local complications
Basis of severity assessment Primarily clinical: presence and duration of organ failure Clinical and morphologic: organ failure, local complications, and infection status
Role of imaging Imaging may confirm an uncertain diagnosis or assess deterioration, but early CECT can underestimate evolving necrosis Cross-sectional imaging is more reliable for characterizing necrosis, collection contents, and encapsulation
Patients affected All patients with acute pancreatitis Generally patients with moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis
  • The phases overlap rather than changing at a rigid time point.
  • The onset of acute pancreatitis is dated from the onset of abdominal pain, not from hospital admission.[1]
  • Morphologic findings do not replace clinical assessment of organ failure in the early phase.
  • Routine CT is not required solely to assign an early severity category when the diagnosis is established and the patient is improving. CT should be reserved for diagnostic uncertainty, clinical deterioration, or failure to improve after 48–72 hours.[5]

Classification Based on Severity

Acute pancreatitis severity is classified most commonly using the three-tier Revised Atlanta Classification; the four-tier Determinant-Based Classification may be used when the interaction between organ failure and infected necrosis needs to be emphasized.

Revised Atlanta Classification

Acute pancreatitis is classified by the RAC as mild, moderately severe, or severe according to the presence and duration of organ failure and the presence of local or systemic complications.[1][6][7]

RAC severity grade Organ failure Local or systemic complications Definition
Mild None None No organ failure and no local or systemic complications
Moderately severe Transient organ failure that resolves within 48 hours, or no organ failure May be present Transient organ failure and/or local or systemic complications, without persistent organ failure
Severe Persistent organ failure involving one or more organ systems May be present or absent Organ failure that persists beyond 48 hours
  • Local complications include acute peripancreatic fluid collection, pancreatic pseudocyst, acute necrotic collection, walled-off necrosis, and other local manifestations such as gastric outlet dysfunction, splenic or portal vein thrombosis, and colonic necrosis.[1]
  • Systemic complications are exacerbations of pre-existing comorbid disease precipitated by acute pancreatitis, such as worsening chronic lung disease or coronary artery disease.[1]
  • Transient organ failure resolves within 48 hours and places the patient in the moderately severe category.
  • Persistent organ failure continues beyond 48 hours and defines severe acute pancreatitis, whether it involves one organ system or multiple organ systems.[8]
  • Severity is dynamic. When organ failure is present but has not yet persisted for 48 hours, the episode should be considered potentially severe and reassessed rather than prematurely assigned a final category.[1]
  • Local complications alone do not define severe acute pancreatitis; severe disease requires persistent organ failure.

Determinant-Based Classification

Acute pancreatitis is classified by the DBC according to two determinants: the systemic determinant of organ failure and the local determinant of pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis and its infection status.[2][9][10]

DBC severity grade Local determinant Systemic determinant Definition
Mild No pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis No organ failure Neither determinant is present
Moderate Sterile pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis may be present Transient organ failure may be present Sterile necrosis and/or transient organ failure
Severe Infected pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis may be present Persistent organ failure may be present Infected necrosis or persistent organ failure, but not both together
Critical Infected pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis Persistent organ failure Both determinants are present

The principal distinction between the systems is that the DBC reserves a separate critical category for the combination of infected necrosis and persistent organ failure. Comparative cohort studies have found that both the RAC and DBC stratify worsening outcomes effectively; neither system has shown a consistent overall performance advantage, although the DBC provides additional separation of the highest-risk combination.[11][12]

Original Atlanta Classification Versus Revised Atlanta Classification

Acute pancreatitis was classified by the original 1992 Atlanta system as either mild or severe; the 2012 revision introduced a three-tier clinical severity system and standardized morphologic terminology.[1][13]

Feature Original Atlanta Classification (1992) Revised Atlanta Classification (2012)
Severity categories Mild and severe Mild, moderately severe, and severe
Organ-failure definition Heterogeneous clinical thresholds Modified Marshall score ≥2 in the respiratory, renal, or cardiovascular system
Duration of organ failure Not incorporated consistently Transient if it resolves within 48 hours; persistent if it continues beyond 48 hours
Clinical phases Not formally separated Early and late phases
Morphologic subtypes Terminology was less standardized Interstitial edematous pancreatitis and necrotizing pancreatitis
Collection terminology Included terms such as acute pseudocyst and pancreatic abscess APFC, pseudocyst, ANC, and WON, defined by contents, encapsulation, pancreatitis subtype, and timing

The original Atlanta system used specific thresholds such as systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg, PaO2 ≤60 mmHg, serum creatinine ≥2 mg/dL after rehydration, and gastrointestinal bleeding >500 mL in 24 hours as manifestations of organ failure. The RAC replaced these heterogeneous criteria with the standardized modified Marshall system.[1][3]

Classification of Organ Failure

Acute pancreatitis organ failure is defined by a modified Marshall score of 2 or more in at least one of three organ systems: respiratory, renal, or cardiovascular.[1][14]

Organ system Score 0 Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4
Respiratory: PaO2/FiO2 >400 301–400 201–300 101–200 ≤100
Renal: serum creatinine, mg/dL <1.4 1.4–1.8 1.9–3.6 3.7–4.9 >4.9
Cardiovascular: systolic blood pressure, mmHg >90 <90, fluid responsive <90, not fluid responsive <90 with pH <7.3 <90 with pH <7.2
  • A score of ≥2 in any one organ system defines organ failure.
  • Organ failure may be single-organ or multiple-organ failure.
  • In patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease, the renal score must be interpreted according to deterioration from baseline because no formal correction exists for an elevated baseline creatinine.[1]
  • For a non-ventilated patient, estimated FiO2 values are:
    • Room air: 0.21
    • 2 L/min supplemental oxygen: approximately 0.25
    • 4 L/min: approximately 0.30
    • 6–8 L/min: approximately 0.40
    • 9–10 L/min: approximately 0.50
  • The modified Marshall score is used to define current organ failure. Prognostic scores estimate the risk of a future severe course and are not substitutes for the RAC severity definition.

Classification Based on Morphology

Acute pancreatitis is divided into two morphologic subtypes: interstitial edematous pancreatitis and necrotizing pancreatitis.[1][3][13]

Feature Interstitial edematous pancreatitis Necrotizing pancreatitis
Definition Acute pancreatic and peripancreatic inflammation without recognizable tissue necrosis Acute inflammation associated with necrosis of the pancreatic parenchyma, peripancreatic tissues, or both
Pancreatic enhancement on CECT Relatively homogeneous enhancement Nonenhancing pancreatic parenchyma when pancreatic necrosis is present; the gland may enhance normally in isolated peripancreatic necrosis
Peripancreatic findings Fat haziness or stranding; an acute peripancreatic fluid collection may be present Heterogeneous areas or collections containing variable amounts of necrotic tissue and fluid
Anatomic patterns No necrosis Combined pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis is most common; isolated peripancreatic necrosis is less common; isolated pancreatic parenchymal necrosis is rare
Possible evolution Resolution, APFC, or pseudocyst Sterile or infected necrosis; ANC or WON
  • Interstitial edematous pancreatitis is the most common morphologic subtype and usually resolves during the first week.[1]
  • Necrotizing pancreatitis occurs in approximately 5–10% of patients.[1][5]
  • Early CECT may show patchy or heterogeneous enhancement before necrosis becomes clearly demarcated. When imaging is clinically indicated, a nonenhancing area after the first week is considered pancreatic parenchymal necrosis.[1][15]
  • Pancreatic necrosis is defined by nonviable pancreatic parenchyma and/or peripancreatic tissue, not by a mandatory threshold of more than 3 cm or more than 30% of the gland.
  • The extent of necrosis does not have an absolute relationship with the risk of infection.[1]
  • Morphologic subtype and clinical severity are separate axes. Necrotizing pancreatitis may occur without persistent organ failure, while persistent organ failure defines severe acute pancreatitis regardless of the morphologic subtype.

Classification of Local Collections

Acute pancreatitis collections are classified according to the underlying morphologic subtype, the presence or absence of necrotic material, encapsulation, and time from symptom onset.[1][16]

Collection Associated morphology Usual timing Contents Wall and location
Acute peripancreatic fluid collection (APFC) Interstitial edematous pancreatitis Within the first 4 weeks Homogeneous fluid without a nonliquid component No definable wall; confined by normal peripancreatic fascial planes; adjacent to the pancreas without intrapancreatic extension
Pancreatic pseudocyst Interstitial edematous pancreatitis Usually more than 4 weeks Homogeneous fluid with no solid necrotic component Well-defined, completely encapsulated inflammatory wall; usually outside the pancreas
Acute necrotic collection (ANC) Necrotizing pancreatitis Within the first 4 weeks Variable amounts of fluid and necrotic tissue; may appear relatively homogeneous early No definable wall; may be intrapancreatic and/or extrapancreatic
Walled-off necrosis (WON) Necrotizing pancreatitis Usually 4 weeks or more Encapsulated pancreatic and/or peripancreatic necrotic material with variable fluid content Mature, well-defined inflammatory wall; may be intrapancreatic and/or extrapancreatic
  • The 4-week threshold describes the usual evolution of a collection and should be interpreted with its contents and degree of encapsulation rather than used in isolation.
  • Within the first week, APFC and ANC may both appear predominantly fluid and may be difficult to distinguish. Sequential CT, MRI, ultrasound, or endoscopic ultrasound may better demonstrate a solid necrotic component.[1]
  • A true pseudocyst contains fluid without necrotic debris. A mature collection containing necrotic material is WON, even if it appears predominantly cystic on CT.[13]
  • WON usually matures after approximately 4 weeks, although demarcated necrotic collections may occasionally form earlier.[17]
  • Infection is a modifier rather than a separate collection type. Necrosis and collections should be described as sterile or infected when this is known or strongly suspected.
  • Extraluminal gas within pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis strongly suggests infection, but the absence of gas does not exclude infected necrosis.[1][12]

Standardized Terminology and Reporting

Acute pancreatitis should be reported using standardized RAC terminology so that the clinical severity grade, morphologic subtype, and collection type remain distinct.

Avoid or qualify Preferred terminology Reason
Acute pseudocyst APFC or ANC, depending on contents and morphologic subtype A pseudocyst is an encapsulated fluid-only collection that usually requires more than 4 weeks to mature
Pancreatic abscess Infected ANC or infected WON The older term does not adequately describe whether necrotic material or a mature wall is present
Phlegmon Describe the specific inflammatory change, necrosis, or collection The term is nonspecific and is not part of the RAC lexicon
Organized pancreatic necrosis or necroma WON WON is the standardized term for mature encapsulated necrosis
Severe pancreatitis based on CT appearance alone State the morphologic subtype and assign RAC severity according to organ failure Persistent organ failure, not the extent of imaging abnormalities alone, defines severe acute pancreatitis

A complete description should include:

  • Time from onset of abdominal pain
  • RAC severity category and whether organ failure is transient or persistent
  • Organ system or systems involved
  • Interstitial edematous or necrotizing morphology
  • Location of necrosis: pancreatic, peripancreatic, or both
  • Collection type, location, contents, and degree of encapsulation
  • Sterile or infected status when known or strongly suspected
  • Relevant additional local complications

Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls

Acute pancreatitis classification is dynamic and must be updated as organ failure resolves or persists and as local complications evolve.

High-yield principles

  • The duration of organ failure is the key distinction between moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis.
  • A modified Marshall score of ≥2 in any assessed organ system defines organ failure; persistence beyond 48 hours defines severe acute pancreatitis.
  • Mild acute pancreatitis requires all three of the following: no organ failure, no local complications, and no systemic complications.
  • A local complication without persistent organ failure is classified as moderately severe, not severe.
  • Morphologic subtype, collection type, and clinical severity should each be stated separately.
  • The DBC adds a critical category for infected necrosis combined with persistent organ failure.

Common pitfalls

  • Assigning a final severity category at admission when the duration of organ failure is not yet known
  • Omitting systemic complications from the definition of moderately severe acute pancreatitis
  • Treating a prognostic score as though it were the RAC severity classification
  • Equating necrotizing pancreatitis with severe acute pancreatitis
  • Defining pancreatic necrosis by an obsolete size or percentage threshold
  • Calling every mature pancreatic collection a pseudocyst without assessing for solid necrotic debris
  • Applying the 4-week threshold without considering collection contents and encapsulation
  • Using early CECT to exclude necrosis when perfusion abnormalities have not yet fully evolved

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C; et al. (2013). “Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus”. Gut. 62 (1): 102–111. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Dellinger EP, Forsmark CE, Layer P; et al. (2012). “Determinant-based classification of acute pancreatitis severity: an international multidisciplinary consultation”. Ann Surg. 256 (6): 875–880. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256f778.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Thoeni RF (2012). “The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment”. Radiology. 262 (3): 751–764. doi:10.1148/radiol.11110947.
  4. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging, Porter KK, Zaheer A; et al. (2019). “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Pancreatitis”. J Am Coll Radiol. 16 (11S): S316–S330. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.017.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG; et al. (2024). “American College of Gastroenterology guidelines: management of acute pancreatitis”. Am J Gastroenterol. 119 (3): 419–437. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645.
  6. Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD (2021). “Acute pancreatitis: a review”. JAMA. 325 (4): 382–390. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.20317.
  7. Wu BU, Banks PA (2013). “Clinical management of patients with acute pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 144 (6): 1272–1281. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.075.
  8. Trikudanathan G, Yazici C, Evans Phillips A, Forsmark CE (2024). “Diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 167 (4): 673–688. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.052.
  9. Boxhoorn L, Voermans RP, Bouwense SA; et al. (2020). “Acute pancreatitis”. Lancet. 396 (10252): 726–734. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6.
  10. Aaron AE, Amabile A, Andolfi C; et al. (2021). Gastrointestinal Surgical Emergencies. American College of Surgeons.
  11. Bansal SS, Hodson J, Sutcliffe RS; et al. (2016). “Performance of the revised Atlanta and determinant-based classifications for severity in acute pancreatitis”. Br J Surg. 103 (4): 427–433. doi:10.1002/bjs.10088.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Trikudanathan G, Wolbrink DRJ, van Santvoort HC; et al. (2019). “Current concepts in severe acute and necrotizing pancreatitis: an evidence-based approach”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1994–2007.e3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.269.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Foster BR, Jensen KK, Bakis G, Shaaban AM, Coakley FV (2016). “Revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: a pictorial essay”. Radiographics. 36 (3): 675–687. doi:10.1148/rg.2016150097.
  14. Garg PK, Singh VP (2019). “Organ failure due to systemic injury in acute pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 2008–2023. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.041.
  15. Milano RV, Morneault-Gill K, Kamal HY, Barkin JA, Chadwick CB (2024). “Pancreatitis in cystic fibrosis: presentation, medical and surgical management, and the impact of modulator therapies”. Pediatr Pulmonol. 59 (Suppl 1): S53–S60. doi:10.1002/ppul.26958.
  16. Muthusamy VR, Chandrasekhara V, Acosta RD; et al. (2016). “The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory pancreatic fluid collections”. Gastrointest Endosc. 83 (3): 481–488. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.027.
  17. Maurer LR, Fagenholz PJ (2023). “Contemporary surgical management of pancreatic necrosis”. JAMA Surg. 158 (1): 81–88. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5695.
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:  Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2]; Monish Thuvooru Muthu Kalyanaraman, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammatory injury of the pancreas in which an initiating insult disrupts acinar and ductal cell homeostasis. Premature digestive-enzyme activation, sustained intracellular calcium elevation, mitochondrial failure, impaired autophagy, lipotoxicity, and regulated cell-death pathways interact to produce local pancreatic injury.[1][2] Release of damage-associated molecular patterns, activated enzymes, cytokines, and lipotoxic metabolites then recruits innate immune cells and may progress to endothelial dysfunction, capillary leak, pancreatic microcirculatory failure, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and organ failure.

Pathophysiologic level Principal abnormalities Major consequences
Acinar cell Premature zymogen activation, sustained Ca2+ signaling, mitochondrial permeability transition, impaired autophagy, and ER stress ATP depletion, intracellular enzyme activation, necrosis, and release of inflammatory mediators
Ductal cell Impaired CFTR-mediated bicarbonate and fluid secretion Acidic, low-volume ductal secretions, protein plugging, impaired washout, and enhanced intraductal enzyme activation
Stellate and immune cells Ca2+-dependent intercellular signaling, macrophage and neutrophil activation, inflammasome signaling, and complement activation Amplification of acinar injury and local inflammation
Adipose tissue and circulating triglycerides Pancreatic lipase-mediated release of nonesterified unsaturated fatty acids Mitochondrial toxicity, endothelial injury, fat necrosis, and systemic organ injury
Systemic circulation DAMPs, cytokines, activated leukocytes, endothelial activation, capillary leak, and microthrombosis SIRS, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, shock, and multiorgan failure

Pathogenesis

Acinar Cell Injury and Premature Trypsinogen Activation

The pancreatic acinar cell is the primary site of initial injury in AP. Under physiologic conditions, digestive enzymes are synthesized, stored as inactive zymogens in zymogen granules, and secreted into the duodenum where enterokinase activates trypsinogen to trypsin, which in turn activates other zymogens.[1][3] Multiple protective mechanisms prevent intrapancreatic trypsin activity: compartmentalization of zymogens, synthesis of the specific trypsin inhibitor SPINK1, autolysis of prematurely activated trypsin, and maintenance of low intracellular ionized calcium concentrations.

In AP, these safeguards are overwhelmed. The initiating event involves co-localization of lysosomal hydrolases (particularly cathepsin B) with zymogen granules within acinar cells, leading to premature intrapancreatic trypsinogen activation.[2][4] Cathepsin B cleaves trypsinogen to trypsin, which then activates additional zymogens (elastase, phospholipase A2, chymotrypsinogen) and triggers the complement and kinin cascades, resulting in autodigestion of pancreatic parenchyma. Recent biochemical work has identified cystatin C (CST3) as a critical endogenous regulator of cathepsin B and cathepsin L activity; trypsin can cleave CST3, converting it from an inhibitor to an activator of cathepsin B, thereby creating a positive feedback loop that amplifies the intrapancreatic protease cascade.

However, the traditional “trypsin-centric” theory has been substantially refined. Genetic mouse models in which trypsinogen activation is eliminated (T7D23A knock-in mice) still develop significant pancreatitis responses, including acinar cell death and inflammation.[5] Current evidence suggests that trypsin is a mediator rather than the sole driver of disease, and that other intra-acinar pathologic processes – particularly defective autophagy, mitochondrial dysfunction, and calcium toxicity – play equally or more critical roles in disease initiation and progression, though whether trypsin-independent mechanisms are sufficient on their own in human (rather than murine) disease remains an open question.

Calcium Toxicity and Calcineurin Signaling

In AP, pancreatitis-inducing toxins (bile acids, fatty acid ethyl esters [FAEEs], supramaximal cholecystokinin stimulation) cause a sustained, global elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ through several mechanisms:[6][7]

  • Excessive Ca2+ release from ER stores via IP3 and ryanodine receptors
  • Sustained store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) through plasma membrane ORAI1 channels regulated by STIM1/2
  • Impaired Ca2+ clearance due to ATP depletion affecting SERCA (ER reuptake) and PMCA (plasma membrane extrusion) pumps

Pathologic Ca2+ signaling also activates the phosphatase calcineurin, which mediates both premature trypsinogen activation and NF-κB activation. Bile acids activate calcineurin to injure acinar cells, transient high pancreatic ductal pressure promotes inflammation and disrupts tight junctions via calcineurin signaling, and pharmacologic or genetic calcineurin inhibition reduces pancreatitis severity in multiple experimental models, with the protective effect dependent on the pancreatic acinar cell source of calcineurin rather than hematopoietic cells.[8][2][9][10]

This Ca2+ overload has multiple downstream consequences: premature trypsinogen activation, mitochondrial Ca2+ overload via the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU), opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP), and ultimately acinar cell necrosis. The vicious cycle of Ca2+ overload → mitochondrial failure → ATP depletion → further impairment of Ca2+ clearance is now recognized as a central pathogenic loop in AP.

Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Mitochondrial injury is increasingly recognized as a key early event that may precede both cytokine release and trypsinogen activation.[11] The principal manifestation is persistent opening of the MPTP, a cyclophilin D (CypD)-dependent solute channel, which causes:[12]

  • Loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm)
  • Mitochondrial fragmentation
  • Collapse of oxidative phosphorylation and ATP depletion
  • Release of mitochondrial contents (cytochrome c, mitochondrial DNA) into the cytosol

The mechanisms of MPTP opening are model-specific: Ca2+ overload drives MPTP opening in cerulein-induced pancreatitis, inhibition of ATP synthase mediates it in arginine-induced pancreatitis, and a decreased NAD+/NADH ratio from oxidative alcohol metabolism triggers it in alcohol-induced pancreatitis. Importantly, CypD genetic deletion or pharmacologic inhibition prevents mitochondrial depolarization and greatly reduces pancreatic, systemic, and pulmonary injury across all experimental models.

Released mitochondrial DNA acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP), activating the cGAS-STING1 pathway, NF-κB signaling, and NLRP3 inflammasomes, thereby linking mitochondrial injury directly to the inflammatory cascade.[13]

Impaired Autophagy

Autophagy – the lysosomal degradation pathway for recycling damaged organelles and long-lived proteins – is characteristically impaired in AP. This impairment results from defective lysosomal function rather than insufficient autophagosome formation: lysosomal cathepsin processing is defective, lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP-2) levels are dramatically reduced, and vacuolar proton ATPase localization is altered, all leading to accumulation of large autolysosomes containing poorly degraded cargo.

The functional consequences of impaired autophagy are significant:

  • Accumulation of damaged mitochondria (failed mitophagy), perpetuating the mitochondrial dysfunction–ATP depletion cycle
  • Persistence of activated zymogens within vacuoles
  • ER stress through accumulation of misfolded proteins
  • Deregulated lipid metabolism in acinar cells

Genetic models confirm the essential role of autophagy: pancreas-specific knockout of ATG5 or ATG7 causes spontaneous pancreatitis with trypsinogen activation, inflammation, fibrosis, and acinar-to-ductal metaplasia. Conversely, enhancing autophagic flux with trehalose largely prevents trypsinogen activation and necrosis in experimental models, and normalizes the downstream consequences of mitochondrial dysfunction.[14]

Ductal Cell Injury and Impaired Bicarbonate Secretion

Although acinar cells have traditionally been the focus of AP pathogenesis, pancreatic ductal cells play a critical protective role through secretion of bicarbonate-rich fluid that maintains alkaline intraductal pH and washes out protein-rich acinar secretions. Pancreatitis-inducing agents (bile acids, ethanol, nonoxidative ethanol metabolites) cause sustained Ca2+ overload in ductal cells via apical Orai1 channels, impairing CFTR-mediated bicarbonate and fluid secretion. The resulting luminal acidification enhances pathologic trypsinogen activation. Mice with selectively impaired ductal function (NHERF-1 knockout, causing CFTR mislocalization) develop more severe pancreatitis despite normal acinar and immune cell function, providing direct evidence that ductal dysfunction amplifies disease severity.[15] This mechanism also explains the clinical association between CFTR mutations and recurrent AP.[12][16][17]

Stellate Cell Amplification Loop

Pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) contribute to an intercellular amplification loop that promotes acinar cell necrosis. Trypsin and kallikrein released from dying acinar cells generate bradykinin, which activates B2 receptors on PSCs, inducing Ca2+ signals and nitric oxide production that further damages neighboring acinar cells. In alcohol-related AP, PSCs lose their normal bradykinin responsiveness but acquire sensitivity to trypsin via protease-activated receptors, creating a vicious circle of progressive necrosis. Inhibition of Ca2+ entry through CRAC channels in PSCs reduces acinar cell necrosis in experimental models, identifying this intercellular pathway as a potential therapeutic target.[18][19][20]

Lipotoxicity and Unsaturated Fatty Acids

Peripancreatic and visceral fat lipolysis by leaked pancreatic lipases generates unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) – predominantly linoleic, oleic, and palmitoleic acid – that are enriched in human pancreatic necrotic collections (15–25% linoleic acid composition). These UFAs inhibit mitochondrial complexes I and V, cause acinar cell necrosis, induce ARDS-like lung injury, elevate BUN via renal tubular injury, and trigger DAMP-mediated cytokine release (TNF-α, IL-1β, MCP-1, IL-18). Critically, UFA-mediated lipotoxicity can convert mild AP to severe AP independent of pancreatic parenchymal necrosis, as demonstrated by the finding that lipase inhibition (orlistat) prevents fat necrosis, organ failure, and mortality without affecting AP induction parameters. In human cohorts, circulating UFA levels (particularly palmitoleic acid) independently correlate with severe AP. This pathway provides a mechanistic explanation for the well-established association between obesity (particularly visceral adiposity) and AP severity, and identifies lipase inhibition as a potential therapeutic target.[21][22][23][24]

Cell Death Pathways and Disease Severity

The mode of acinar cell death is a critical determinant of disease severity. Multiple regulated cell death (RCD) pathways operate in AP, and their relative balance shapes the clinical phenotype:[25][26]

Cell-death pathway Principal mechanism Pathophysiologic consequence
Apoptosis Caspase-dependent, energy-requiring programmed cell death Relatively contained removal of injured cells with limited release of intracellular DAMPs; generally associated with less severe inflammation than necrotic cell death
Necroptosis Regulated necrosis mediated by the RIP1/RIP3/MLKL necrosome complex after TNF, Fas-ligand, or TLR signaling Membrane disruption and DAMP release, with activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes and amplification of inflammation
Pyroptosis Inflammasome-dependent, gasdermin-mediated inflammatory cell death Release of inflammatory intracellular contents and cytokines
Ferroptosis Iron-dependent lipid peroxidation and membrane injury Increasingly implicated in intestinal epithelial and barrier injury during severe acute pancreatitis

The switch from apoptosis to necrosis is governed primarily by ATP availability and caspase function. When mitochondrial dysfunction depletes ATP, caspase-dependent apoptosis cannot proceed, and cells default to necrosis or necroptosis. Chronic ethanol exposure depletes LAMP-2, blocks autophagy, reduces caspase activation, and shifts cell death toward necrosis – accompanied by nuclear release of the pro-inflammatory DAMP HMGB1.[27] Interventions that shift the balance from necrosis toward apoptosis (e.g., XIAP inhibition, RIP3 deletion, necrostatin treatment) consistently reduce disease severity in experimental models.

Etiology-Specific Pathophysiologic Mechanisms

Gallstone pancreatitis results from transient obstruction of the pancreatic duct by migrating stones or sludge, causing increased ductal pressure, interstitial edema, and accumulation of enzyme-rich fluid, which triggers acinar cell injury and premature enzyme activation.

Regardless of the route of bile acid exposure, bile acids injure acinar cells through multiple signaling pathways. At sub-micellar concentrations, unconjugated bile acids activate the G-protein-coupled cell surface receptor Gpbar1 (TGR5), triggering pathologic Ca2+ transients via IP3 receptors; Gpbar1 deletion protects mice from bile acid-induced pancreatitis, suggesting biliary AP may be, at least in part, a receptor-mediated disease. Bile acids are also internalized via apical and basolateral bile acid transporters and exert injurious effects intracellularly through both IP3 and ryanodine receptor-mediated Ca2+ release from ER and acidic stores at the apical pole of acinar cells.[28][29] Conjugated bile acids acting via TGR5 on macrophages inhibit NLRP3 inflammasome activation through the cAMP-PKA axis (PKA phosphorylates NLRP3 at Ser291, promoting its ubiquitination), an anti-inflammatory counter-mechanism distinct from the pro-injury TGR5 signaling in acinar cells.[30][31]

Alcohol-induced pancreatitis involves both oxidative and nonoxidative metabolic pathways within acinar cells.[32] The oxidative pathway (via ADH and CYP2E1) produces acetaldehyde and ROS, depletes mitochondrial glutathione, and reduces the NAD+/NADH ratio, opening the MPTP. The nonoxidative pathway generates fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs), which accumulate in mitochondria, release fatty acids that cause Ca2+ overload via IP3 receptor activation, impair SERCA/PMCA pump function, and trigger the Ca2+–mitochondrial dysfunction–ATP depletion cycle.[33] FAEEs also disrupt lysosomal and zymogen granule membranes, impair autophagy, and activate NF-κB. Alcohol additionally induces ER stress through the unfolded protein response (UPR); the adaptive UPR may explain why only a minority of heavy drinkers develop clinical pancreatitis. Smoking synergistically exacerbates alcohol-induced ER stress and acinar cell death.

Hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis (typically at triglyceride levels >1000 mg/dL) involves pancreatic lipase-mediated hydrolysis of excess triglycerides both locally within the pancreatic microcirculation and systemically in the intravascular space, generating toxic nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) – predominantly long-chain unsaturated species – that cause acinar cell injury, capillary endothelial damage, and local oxidative stress. A prospective study of 269 AP patients found that patients with HTG-AP had higher serum NEFA levels and more severe disease (19% vs. 7% severe AP), and that NEFA-TGFA × lipase correlations strengthened above a triglyceride level of 500 mg/dL, confirming intravascular (not only local pancreatic) lipolysis as a severity driver; the UFA-mediated lipotoxicity mechanism described above is central to this process.[34][23][24]

Drug-induced pancreatitis is uncommon and may occur through direct acinar cell toxicity (e.g., azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine metabolites), hypersensitivity/immune-mediated injury, and indirect mechanisms such as drug-induced hypertriglyceridemia or hypercalcemia; these represent distinct pathophysiologic pathways rather than a single unifying mechanism.[1][35]

Post-ERCP pancreatitis (~5–10% of ERCPs): mechanical and hydrostatic injury to the pancreatic orifice and duct raises intraductal pressure, activating calcineurin-mediated inflammation and disrupting tight junctions (as described in the calcium-calcineurin pathway above); radiocontrast agents independently activate NF-κB and calcineurin via pathologic Ca2+ signaling in acinar cells, and thermal injury from electrocautery may contribute.[36][8]

From Local Injury to Systemic Inflammation

The transition from localized pancreatic injury to systemic disease follows a well-characterized inflammatory cascade:[37][38]

  1. Acinar cell injury releases DAMPs (HMGB1, nucleosomes, extracellular ATP, mitochondrial DNA) and activated enzymes into the interstitium
  2. Innate immune activation: neutrophils and macrophages (differentiating to pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype) infiltrate the pancreas, activating pattern recognition receptors (TLR4, TLR9, NLRP3 inflammasome, AIM2 inflammasome). Macrophage infiltration correlates more strongly with pancreatic damage than neutrophil infiltration; macrophages phagocytose necrotic acinar cell debris and activate trypsinogen intracellularly via cathepsin B, amplifying the inflammatory response through a mechanism distinct from simple cytokine release.[39][2] Recent evidence also demonstrates that neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) activate the ZBP1-cGAS complex via mitochondrial DNA released from NET-damaged acinar cells, triggering necroptosis and amplifying inflammatory pathways – providing a direct mechanistic link between NET formation and regulated acinar cell death; cyclosporine A inhibits this axis by preventing mitochondrial DNA release. However, NETs may also play a protective role by walling off pancreatic necrosis from viable tissue, and whether NET inhibition will prove clinically beneficial remains uncertain.[40]
  3. Complement activation occurs through multiple pathways in AP, including direct trypsin-mediated cleavage of C3 and C5 generating the anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, as well as classical and lectin pathway activation; C5a is a potent neutrophil chemoattractant, and experimental complement inhibition (e.g., soluble complement receptor 1) reduces leukocyte-endothelial interaction and organ injury.[41][42]
  4. Cytokine storm: release of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, TNF-α, and MCP-1; anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) modulate but may not counterbalance the response
  5. Endothelial activation and capillary leak: transendothelial leukocyte migration, microcirculatory failure, increased capillary permeability to plasma proteins (including non-albumin proteins), loss of oncotic pressure, and third-spacing of fluid. Angiopoietin-2, a regulator of endothelial permeability, is elevated on admission in patients who develop persistent organ failure; a meta-analysis of 7 studies (n = 650) found pooled sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.85 (AUC 0.95) for predicting organ failure, providing a mechanistic link between endothelial activation and capillary leak.[43][44]
  6. SIRS and organ failure: uncontrolled systemic inflammation leads to pulmonary edema/ARDS, prerenal azotemia and acute kidney injury, and cardiovascular collapse

A capillary permeability model proposed by Komara et al. (2020), based on sequential biomarker analysis in 57 patients with severe AP, suggests the SIRS-to-MOF transition is driven by progressive capillary leak of plasma proteins; in this cohort, hemoconcentration (hematocrit rise >3 points from baseline) was associated with MOF (OR 17.7, P = 0.014), though validation in larger cohorts is needed. The 2024 American College of Gastroenterology guidelines similarly identify hemoconcentration as a marker of inadequate fluid resuscitation, providing guideline-level context for this pathophysiologic observation.[45][46]

Biphasic Course: Primary and Secondary Organ Failure

Organ failure in AP follows a biphasic pattern with distinct pathophysiology and clinical implications:[24][47]

Phase Typical timing Dominant mechanism
Early or primary organ failure Usually within the first 1–2 weeks Sterile SIRS generated by the initial pancreatic and systemic inflammatory insult; occurs in approximately 20% of patients and carries substantial early mortality
Late or secondary organ failure After the initial inflammatory phase Sepsis associated with infected pancreatic necrosis, often after compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome characterized by HLA-DR suppression, increased co-inhibitory signaling, impaired host defense, and greater susceptibility to bacterial translocation and secondary infection

This SIRS-to-CARS transition is thought to be accompanied by a shift in macrophage polarization from a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype toward an immunosuppressive M2 phenotype, contributing to the immunoparalysis that permits secondary infection, though direct evidence for this polarization shift in human AP remains limited. The SIRS-to-CARS transition is clinically critical: excessive early hyperinflammation causes shock and early MOF, while subsequent immunosuppression permits bacterial translocation into necrotic tissue, leading to IPN and late sepsis-driven MOF. Primary OF is also an independent risk factor for subsequent development of IPN.

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH; intra-abdominal pressure ≥12 mmHg) occurs in 60–80% of patients with severe AP, driven by retroperitoneal edema, fluid collections, ascites, ileus, and iatrogenic fluid overload. Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS; intra-abdominal pressure >20 mmHg with new organ failure) develops in up to 30% of severe AP patients and carries mortality rates of 46–75%. A 2025 meta-analysis of 14 studies (n = 1197) confirmed that IAH is a strong predictor of mortality and respiratory failure even in the absence of ACS. IAH contributes to organ failure by impairing venous return, reducing renal perfusion, elevating diaphragmatic pressure (worsening respiratory failure), and exacerbating gut barrier dysfunction.[48][49][50]

Trypsin and inflammatory mediators also activate the coagulation cascade, promoting microvascular thrombosis that may contribute to pancreatic necrosis and systemic organ injury, though the clinical significance of coagulation activation in driving systemic complications remains incompletely established.[24]

Gut Barrier Dysfunction and Bacterial Translocation

The intestine plays a pivotal role in the progression from local to systemic disease. A meta-analysis of 18 studies found that 59% of AP patients have gut barrier dysfunction.[51] The mechanisms include:

  • Splanchnic hypoperfusion and ischemia-reperfusion injury from hypovolemia and reflex vasoconstriction
  • Disruption of tight junction proteins and increased intestinal permeability
  • Apoptosis and ferroptosis of intestinal epithelial cells
  • Dysbiosis with decreased commensal bacteria and overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens (Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus)
  • Decreased secretory IgA and impaired mucosal immune defense

Bacterial translocation from the gut to pancreatic necrotic collections is the primary mechanism of IPN; circulating bacterial DNA representative of gut microbiota has been detected in ~69% of AP patients. Mesenteric lymph from ischemic intestine can independently exacerbate pancreatic microcirculatory disturbances and worsen pancreatitis severity.[24] However, the translocation hypothesis as the sole explanation for IPN has been questioned, as bacterial translocation is common after dental and endoscopic procedures yet rarely causes sepsis, and patients with severe ulcerative colitis rarely develop systemic sepsis despite extensive colonic ulceration.

Microcirculatory Failure and Pancreatic Necrosis

Pancreatic necrosis develops through microcirculatory failure driven by:

  • Endothelial injury from activated enzymes and inflammatory mediators
  • Vasoconstriction and thrombosis of intrapancreatic vessels
  • Ischemia-reperfusion injury with generation of reactive oxygen species
  • Capillary leak with interstitial edema compressing the microvasculature

The extent of pancreatic necrosis correlates with disease severity. Necrosis is initially sterile but may later become infected through bacterial translocation, transforming the clinical course from sterile SIRS-driven disease to sepsis-driven disease.

Mechanistically Relevant Experimental Targets

The following targets arise directly from the cellular pathways described above. Most evidence remains preclinical, and none should be interpreted as established disease-specific therapy.

  • Calcium and mitochondrial pathways: Investigational targets include ORAI1 inhibitors, MPTP inhibitors, and calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., FK506/tacrolimus). The ORAI1 inhibitor zegocractin (CM4620/Auxora) is the most clinically advanced agent in this class; a phase 2b, randomized, dose-ranging trial (CARPO) reported outcomes supporting further development in AP with SIRS.[52] CM4620 has been shown to act on multiple cell types beyond acinar cells – reducing oxidative burst in neutrophils, cytokine production in macrophages, and fibroinflammatory gene expression in stellate cells – providing a multi-cell-type rationale for ORAI1 inhibition that spans the acinar, stellate, and systemic inflammatory pathways described above.[53] However, acinar cell-specific Orai1 deletion has been shown to cause lethal dysbiosis and sepsis in mice, underscoring that dose optimization rather than complete channel blockade is likely necessary. SARAF induction has been proposed as a potentially safer alternative – SARAF is an endogenous inhibitor of store-operated Ca2+ entry that normally mediates Orai1 inactivation via interaction with STIM1. During pathological stimulation, SARAF dissociates from STIM1 and is subsequently degraded, permitting sustained toxic Ca2+ influx. SARAF overexpression protects against experimental pancreatitis while its deletion exacerbates disease, without causing the lethal dysbiosis seen with Orai1 deletion; therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing SARAF degradation or restoring its expression could therefore partially limit Ca2+ influx while preserving essential Orai1 functions.[54]
  • CFTR restoration and other pathway-directed approaches: CFTR correctors/potentiators (e.g., elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor), already approved for cystic fibrosis, have been proposed as potential therapeutic agents to restore ductal bicarbonate secretion impaired by alcohol, bile acids, or CFTR mutations, based on the ductal dysfunction mechanism described above; preclinical and early clinical evidence supports this concept, but no AP-specific trials have been conducted.[55][56] The TGR5 agonist INT-777 and lipase inhibition (e.g., orlistat) are additional investigational targets arising from the macrophage/bile-acid and lipotoxicity pathways described above, respectively, and have not yet been tested in human AP trials.[57]

Unresolved Mechanisms and Translational Questions

  • Whether trypsin activation is truly necessary for pancreatitis initiation remains debated; genetic mouse models in which trypsinogen activation is eliminated still develop pancreatitis, but the relative contribution of trypsin-dependent vs. trypsin-independent mechanisms in human disease is unknown
  • The relative contributions of Ca2+-dependent vs. Ca2+-independent mechanisms of MPTP opening in human disease are unclear
  • Whether gut bacterial translocation is the sole mechanism of infected necrosis is questioned; clinical observations in inflammatory bowel disease patients with severe mucosal disease but low sepsis rates challenge this hypothesis
  • The role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in determining individual susceptibility to severe disease is incompletely understood
  • Whether pharmacologic enhancement of autophagy (e.g., trehalose), calcineurin inhibition (e.g., repurposed tacrolimus), or partial ORAI1/SARAF-targeted calcium modulation will translate from experimental models to human therapy remains to be determined
  • The precise mechanism by which alcohol causes pancreatitis in only a minority of heavy drinkers (the “susceptibility gap”) is not fully explained, though the adaptive UPR and genetic cofactors likely contribute

Genetics

Genetic susceptibility to acute pancreatitis involves variants that alter trypsin activation or degradation, ductal bicarbonate secretion, calcium homeostasis, protein folding, and endoplasmic-reticulum stress. The best-characterized variants include:

Gene Normal role Pathogenic mechanism
PRSS1 Encodes cationic trypsinogen Gain-of-function variants such as R122H and N29I promote premature autoactivation or resistance to degradation; the prototypical autosomal-dominant cause of hereditary pancreatitis
SPINK1 Inhibits prematurely activated trypsin Loss-of-function variants such as N34S reduce intrapancreatic trypsin inhibition and usually act as disease modifiers
CTRC Degrades trypsinogen and trypsin Reduced protective degradation increases intrapancreatic trypsin activity and modifies susceptibility and progression
CFTR Supports ductal chloride, bicarbonate, and fluid secretion Impaired ductal secretion increases protein concentration and intraductal calcium and promotes obstruction and enzyme activation; co-inheritance with SPINK1 may further increase risk
CPA1 Encodes carboxypeptidase A1 Misfolding variants produce endoplasmic-reticulum stress
CLDN2 Encodes the X-linked tight-junction protein claudin-2 Variants are associated with alcohol- and smoking-related pancreatitis susceptibility
CASR Regulates extracellular and intracellular calcium responses Variants may alter calcium homeostasis and modify susceptibility to pancreatitis

These genetic pathways converge on three principal mechanisms: (1) enhanced trypsinogen activation, (2) impaired trypsin degradation/inhibition, and (3) protein misfolding with ER stress. In pediatric cohorts, genetic variants are found in ~19–27% of AP patients and are the dominant risk factor (unlike adults, where environmental factors predominate).[58][59]

Associated Conditions

Acute pancreatitis is associated with several disorders or exposures that converge on the same cellular pathways but enter through different initiating mechanisms.

Associated condition or exposure Pathophysiologic relationship
Biliary stone disease Transient ampullary or pancreatic duct obstruction increases ductal pressure and exposes acinar and ductal cells to bile-acid signaling, promoting pathologic Ca2+ release and enzyme activation.[29]
Alcohol use and cigarette smoking Oxidative and nonoxidative alcohol metabolites impair mitochondrial function, calcium clearance, autophagy, and CFTR-mediated ductal secretion; smoking may amplify ER stress and acinar-cell injury.[32]
Hypertriglyceridemia, obesity, and visceral adiposity Lipolysis generates toxic nonesterified fatty acids that injure acinar cells, mitochondria, endothelium, renal tubules, and pulmonary tissue.[34][21]
Cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disease Reduced ductal bicarbonate and fluid secretion produces concentrated, acidic secretions and impaired zymogen washout, increasing susceptibility to acute or recurrent pancreatitis.[15]
Hereditary or recurrent pancreatitis Variants in PRSS1, SPINK1, CTRC, CPA1, CFTR, CASR, and related genes alter trypsin regulation, ductal secretion, protein folding, or calcium homeostasis.[25]
ERCP and pancreatic duct instrumentation Mechanical, hydrostatic, chemical, and thermal injury may disrupt ductal and acinar homeostasis and activate calcineurin and NF-κB signaling.[36]
Drug exposure and metabolic abnormalities Mechanisms vary and may include direct acinar toxicity, immune-mediated injury, hypertriglyceridemia, or hypercalcemia rather than one shared drug-specific pathway.[1]

Gross Pathology

On gross examination, acute pancreatitis ranges from interstitial edematous inflammation to necrotizing and hemorrhagic injury.[1][60]

Gross pattern Findings
Interstitial edematous pancreatitis
  • Diffuse or focal pancreatic enlargement
  • Interstitial edema and congestion
  • Peripancreatic inflammatory change
  • No macroscopic pancreatic parenchymal necrosis
Necrotizing pancreatitis
  • Nonviable pancreatic parenchyma and/or peripancreatic tissue
  • Irregular gray-white or yellow necrotic tissue
  • Peripancreatic fat necrosis
  • Acute necrotic collections that may later become organized or walled off
Hemorrhagic injury
  • Dark red-black discoloration
  • Parenchymal and peripancreatic hemorrhage
  • Vascular erosion or thrombosis in severe disease
Fat necrosis
  • Chalky white deposits caused by calcium soap formation
  • Involvement of peripancreatic, mesenteric, or omental fat

Microscopic Pathology

On microscopic examination, acute pancreatitis is characterized by variable combinations of interstitial edema, acute inflammation, acinar-cell injury, fat necrosis, hemorrhage, and vascular damage.[1][3]

Microscopic feature Histopathologic appearance and significance
Interstitial edema Separation of acinar lobules by protein-rich fluid, often with vascular congestion and early inflammatory infiltrates
Acinar-cell injury and necrosis Cytoplasmic vacuolization, loss of normal acinar architecture, nuclear pyknosis or karyolysis, and coagulative or liquefactive necrosis
Acute inflammation Predominantly neutrophilic infiltration of pancreatic and peripancreatic tissue, with macrophage recruitment and inflammatory debris
Fat necrosis and saponification Ghost outlines of adipocytes, basophilic granular calcium deposits, and surrounding inflammation
Hemorrhage and vascular injury Extravasated erythrocytes, endothelial injury, fibrin deposition, microvascular thrombosis, and occasional vessel-wall necrosis
Infected necrosis Necrotic tissue with microorganisms and suppurative inflammation; this is a secondary complication rather than a defining feature of early sterile pancreatitis
  • Electron microscopy is not required for routine diagnosis.
  • Experimental ultrastructural findings include swollen mitochondria with disrupted cristae, dilated endoplasmic reticulum, abnormal zymogen-lysosome colocalization, and enlarged autolysosomal vacuoles.[14][12]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD (2021). “Acute Pancreatitis”. JAMA. 325 (4): 382–390. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.20317.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Saluja A, Dudeja V, Dawra R, Sah RP (2019). “Early Intra-Acinar Events in Pathogenesis of Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1979–1993. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.268.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Frossard JL, Steer ML, Pastor CM (2008). “Acute Pancreatitis”. Lancet. 371 (9607): 143–52. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60107-5.
  4. Modenbach JM, Möller C, Asgarbeik S; et al. (2025). “Biochemical Analyses of Cystatin-C Dimers and Cathepsin-B Reveals a Trypsin-Driven Feedback Mechanism in Acute Pancreatitis”. Nat Commun. 16 (1): 1702. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56875-x.
  5. Gukovskaya AS, Lerch MM, Mayerle J; et al. (2024). “Trypsin in Pancreatitis: The Culprit, a Mediator, or Epiphenomenon?”. World J Gastroenterol. 30 (41): 4417–4438. doi:10.3748/wjg.v30.i41.4417.
  6. Petersen OH, Gerasimenko JV, Gerasimenko OV, Gryshchenko O, Peng S (2021). “The Roles of Calcium and ATP in the Physiology and Pathology of the Exocrine Pancreas”. Physiol Rev. 101 (4): 1691–1744. doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2021.
  7. Maléth J, Hegyi P (2016). “Ca2+ Toxicity and Mitochondrial Damage in Acute Pancreatitis: Translational Overview”. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 371 (1700): 20150425. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0425.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Wen L, Javed TA, Yimlamai D; et al. (2018). “Transient High Pressure in Pancreatic Ducts Promotes Inflammation and Alters Tight Junctions via Calcineurin Signaling in Mice”. Gastroenterology. 155 (4): 1250–1263.e5. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.036.
  9. Wen L, Javed TA, Dobbs AK; et al. (2020). “The Protective Effects of Calcineurin on Pancreatitis in Mice Depend on the Cellular Source”. Gastroenterology. 159 (3): 1036–1050.e8. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.051.
  10. Muili KA, Wang D, Orabi AI; et al. (2013). “Bile Acids Induce Pancreatic Acinar Cell Injury and Pancreatitis by Activating Calcineurin”. J Biol Chem. 288 (1): 570–80. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.428896.
  11. Xia CC, Xu Y, Wang ZH, Xu GQ (2025). “Mitochondrial Dysfunction as a Bridge to Pathology in Acute Pancreatitis: From Molecular Insights to Novel Therapeutic Strategies”. World J Gastroenterol. 31 (48): 113840. doi:10.3748/wjg.v31.i48.113840.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Habtezion A, Gukovskaya AS, Pandol SJ (2019). “Acute Pancreatitis: A Multifaceted Set of Organelle and Cellular Interactions”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1941–1950. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.082.
  13. Chen F, Xu K, Han Y; et al. (2024). “Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Pancreatic Acinar Cells: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies in Acute Pancreatitis”. Front Immunol. 15: 1503087. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1503087.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Biczo G, Vegh ET, Shalbueva N; et al. (2018). “Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Through Impaired Autophagy, Leads to Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, Deregulated Lipid Metabolism, and Pancreatitis in Animal Models”. Gastroenterology. 154 (3): 689–703. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.012.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Pallagi P, Balla Z, Singh AK; et al. (2014). “The Role of Pancreatic Ductal Secretion in Protection Against Acute Pancreatitis in Mice”. Crit Care Med. 42 (3): e177–e188. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000101. PMID 24368347.
  16. Pallagi P, Görög M, Papp N; et al. (2022). “Bile Acid- and Ethanol-Mediated Activation of Orai1 Damages Pancreatic Ductal Secretion in Acute Pancreatitis”. J Physiol. 600 (7): 1631–1650. doi:10.1113/JP282203.
  17. Hegyi P, Rakonczay Z (2015). “The Role of Pancreatic Ducts in the Pathogenesis of Acute Pancreatitis”. Pancreatology. 15 (4 Suppl): S13–7. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2015.03.010.
  18. Gryshchenko O, Gerasimenko JV, Peng S, Gerasimenko OV, Petersen OH (2018). “Calcium Signalling in the Acinar Environment of the Exocrine Pancreas: Physiology and Pathophysiology”. J Physiol. 596 (14): 2663–2678. doi:10.1113/JP275395.
  19. Gryshchenko O, Gerasimenko JV, Gerasimenko OV, Petersen OH (2016). “Ca(2+) Signals Mediated by Bradykinin Type 2 Receptors in Normal Pancreatic Stellate Cells Can Be Inhibited by Specific Ca(2+) Channel Blockade”. J Physiol. 594 (2): 281–293. doi:10.1113/JP271468.
  20. Petersen OH (2023). “The 2022 George E Palade Medal Lecture: Toxic Ca2+ Signals in Acinar, Stellate and Endogenous Immune Cells Are Important Drivers of Acute Pancreatitis”. Pancreatology. 23 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2022.12.010.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Noel P, Patel K, Durgampudi C; et al. (2016). “Peripancreatic Fat Necrosis Worsens Acute Pancreatitis Independent of Pancreatic Necrosis via Unsaturated Fatty Acids Increased in Human Pancreatic Necrosis Collections”. Gut. 65 (1): 100–11. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308043.
  22. Patel K, Trivedi RN, Durgampudi C; et al. (2015). “Lipolysis of Visceral Adipocyte Triglyceride by Pancreatic Lipases Converts Mild Acute Pancreatitis to Severe Pancreatitis Independent of Necrosis and Inflammation”. Am J Pathol. 185 (3): 808–819. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.019.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Phillips AE, Wilson AS, Greer PJ; et al. (2023). “Relationship of Circulating Levels of Long-Chain Fatty Acids to Persistent Organ Failure in Acute Pancreatitis”. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 325 (3): G279–G285. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00074.2023.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 Garg PK, Singh VP (2019). “Organ Failure Due to Systemic Injury in Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 2008–2023. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.041.
  25. 25.0 25.1 Mayerle J, Sendler M, Hegyi E; et al. (2019). “Genetics, Cell Biology, and Pathophysiology of Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1951–1968.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.081.
  26. Zhang J, Chen H, Wang Y; et al. (2026). “Cell Death and Its Interaction With Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Pathogenesis of Acute Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Review”. Apoptosis. 31 (2): 66. doi:10.1007/s10495-026-02288-0.
  27. Fortunato F, Bürgers H, Bergmann F; et al. (2009). “Impaired Autolysosome Formation Correlates With Lamp-2 Depletion: Role of Apoptosis, Autophagy, and Necrosis in Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 137 (1): 350–60. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.003.
  28. Perides G, Laukkarinen JM, Vassileva G, Steer ML (2010). “Biliary Acute Pancreatitis in Mice Is Mediated by the G-Protein-Coupled Cell Surface Bile Acid Receptor Gpbar1”. Gastroenterology. 138 (2): 715–25. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.10.052.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Tran QT, Tran VH, Sendler M; et al. (2021). “Role of Bile Acids and Bile Salts in Acute Pancreatitis: From the Experimental to Clinical Studies”. Pancreas. 50 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000001706.
  30. Zhang ZY, Guo XL, Liu JT; et al. (2024). “Conjugated Bile Acids Alleviate Acute Pancreatitis Through Inhibition of TGR5 and NLRP3 Mediated Inflammation”. J Transl Med. 22 (1): 1124. doi:10.1186/s12967-024-05922-0.
  31. Guo C, Xie S, Chi Z; et al. (2016). “Bile Acids Control Inflammation and Metabolic Disorder Through Inhibition of NLRP3 Inflammasome”. Immunity. 45 (4): 802–816. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.008.
  32. 32.0 32.1 Wang F, Görgülü K, Algül H, Hu LH (2026). “The Role of Alcohol in Pancreatic Diseases: A Comprehensive Perspective”. Gastroenterology. 170 (2): 268–286. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.08.025.
  33. Farooq A, Richman CM, Swain SM; et al. (2021). “The Role of Phosphate in Alcohol-Induced Experimental Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 161 (3): 982–995.e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.048.
  34. 34.0 34.1 Rajalingamgari P, Khatua B, Summers MJ; et al. (2025). “Prospective Observational Study and Mechanistic Evidence Showing Lipolysis of Circulating Triglycerides Worsens Hypertriglyceridemic Acute Pancreatitis”. J Clin Invest. 135 (1): e184785. doi:10.1172/JCI184785. PMID 39509346 Check |pmid= value (help).
  35. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM (2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. N Engl J Med. 375 (20): 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202.
  36. 36.0 36.1 Jin S, Orabi AI, Le T; et al. (2015). “Exposure to Radiocontrast Agents Induces Pancreatic Inflammation by Activation of Nuclear Factor-κB, Calcium Signaling, and Calcineurin”. Gastroenterology. 149 (3): 753–764.e11. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.004.
  37. Sendler M, van den Brandt C, Glaubitz J; et al. (2020). “NLRP3 Inflammasome Regulates Development of Systemic Inflammatory Response and Compensatory Anti-Inflammatory Response Syndromes in Mice With Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 158 (1): 253–269.e14. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.040.
  38. Venkatesh K, Glenn H, Delaney A, Andersen CR, Sasson SC (2022). “Fire in the Belly: A Scoping Review of the Immunopathological Mechanisms of Acute Pancreatitis”. Front Immunol. 13: 1077414. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1077414.
  39. Sendler M, Weiss FU, Golchert J; et al. (2018). “Cathepsin B-Mediated Activation of Trypsinogen in Endocytosing Macrophages Increases Severity of Pancreatitis in Mice”. Gastroenterology. 154 (3): 704–718.e10. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.018.
  40. Zhang H, Wang Z, Lu J; et al. (2026). “Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Prime the ZBP1-cGAS Sensor Complex, Triggering Necroptosis and Inflammatory Injury in Acute Pancreatitis”. Int J Biol Sci. 22 (5): 2398–2417. doi:10.7150/ijbs.122290.
  41. Bettac L, Denk S, Seufferlein T, Huber-Lang M (2017). “Complement in Pancreatic Disease-Perpetrator or Savior?”. Front Immunol. 8: 15. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00015.
  42. Hartwig W, Klafs M, Kirschfink M; et al. (2006). “Interaction of Complement and Leukocytes in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Potential for Therapeutic Intervention”. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 291 (5): G844–G850. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00016.2006.
  43. Whitcomb DC, Muddana V, Langmead CJ; et al. (2010). “Angiopoietin-2, a Regulator of Vascular Permeability in Inflammation, Is Associated With Persistent Organ Failure in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis From the United States and Germany”. Am J Gastroenterol. 105 (10): 2287–92. doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.183.
  44. Lv Y, Yao Y, Liu Q, Lei J (2021). “Accuracy of Angiopoietin-2 for Predicting Organ Failure in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. J Int Med Res. 49 (2): 300060520986708. doi:10.1177/0300060520986708.
  45. Komara NL, Paragomi P, Greer PJ; et al. (2020). “Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Capillary Permeability Model Linking Systemic Inflammation to Multiorgan Failure”. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 319 (5): G573–G583. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00285.2020.
  46. Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG; et al. (2024). “American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Am J Gastroenterol. 119 (3): 419–437. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645.
  47. Padhan RK, Jain S, Agarwal S; et al. (2018). “Primary and Secondary Organ Failures Cause Mortality Differentially in Acute Pancreatitis and Should Be Distinguished”. Pancreas. 47 (3): 302–307. doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000000998.
  48. Darweesh M, El-Kurdi B, Mahfouz R; et al. (2025). “Intra-Abdominal Hypertension Is a Strong Predictor of Mortality and Poor Clinical Outcome in Severe Acute Pancreatitis”. Dig Dis Sci. 70 (3): 1233–1245. doi:10.1007/s10620-024-08749-3.
  49. van Brunschot S, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG; et al. (2012). “Treatment of Necrotizing Pancreatitis”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 10 (11): 1190–201. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.005.
  50. “IAP/APA Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Pancreatology. 13 (4 Suppl 2): e1–15. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063.
  51. Akshintala VS, Talukdar R, Singh VK, Goggins M (2019). “The Gut Microbiome in Pancreatic Disease”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17 (2): 290–295. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.045.
  52. Sutton R, Garg PK, Miller J; et al. (2026). “Zegocractin for Acute Pancreatitis With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome: A Randomized, Controlled, Dose-Ranging, Phase 2b Trial”. EClinicalMedicine. 93: 103757. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103757.
  53. Waldron RT, Chen Y, Pham H; et al. (2019). “The Orai Ca2+ Channel Inhibitor CM4620 Targets Both Parenchymal and Immune Cells to Reduce Inflammation in Experimental Acute Pancreatitis”. J Physiol. 597 (12): 3085–3105. doi:10.1113/JP277856.
  54. Son A, Ahuja M, Schwartz DM; et al. (2019). “Ca2+ Influx Channel Inhibitor SARAF Protects Mice From Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 157 (6): 1660–1672.e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.042.
  55. Sarkar P, Lin WY, Movahed Abtahi A, Chung WY, Muallem S (2026). “Pancreatitis: Correcting CFTR Expression and Function as a Promising Effective Treatment”. Front Physiol. 17: 1813824. doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1813824.
  56. Maléth J, Balázs A, Pallagi P; et al. (2015). “Alcohol Disrupts Levels and Function of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator to Promote Development of Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 148 (2): 427–39.e16. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.11.002.
  57. Li B, Yang N, Li C; et al. (2018). “INT-777, a Bile Acid Receptor Agonist, Extenuates Pancreatic Acinar Cells Necrosis in a Mouse Model of Acute Pancreatitis”. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 503 (1): 38–44. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.120.
  58. Ahmed F, Abu-El-Haija M (2025). “Acute Pancreatitis in Children: It’s Not Just a Simple Attack”. Gastroenterology. 169 (4): 572–584. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.04.001.
  59. Uc A, Husain SZ (2019). “Pancreatitis in Children”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1969–1978. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.043.
  60. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C; et al. (2013). “Classification of Acute Pancreatitis-2012: Revision of the Atlanta Classification and Definitions by International Consensus”. Gut. 62 (1): 102–111. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.
Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [2]; Tarek Nafee, M.D. [3]

Overview

Acute pancreatitis may be either idiopathic or caused by alcohol, gallstones, trauma, steroids, mumps, autoimmune diseases, ERCP, hypercalcemia, hyperlipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia or certain medications. Gallstones are the most common cause of acute pancreatitis, followed by chronic alcohol consumption (4-5 drinks daily for ~5 years). There are numerous primary and secondary causes of acute pancreatitis that must be considered in a patient’s work up.

Causes

Gallstones are the most common cause of acute pancreatitis, followed by chronic alcohol consumption (4-5 drinks daily for ~5 years).[1] However; there are numerous primary and secondary causes of acute pancreatitis that must be considered in a patient’s work up.[2]

Synopsis

The following table summarizes the most common causes of acute pancreatitis:[3]

Cause Frequency Comment
Gallstones 40% Gallstones or sludge
Alcohol 30% 4-5 drinks daily for 5 years
Hypertriglyceridemia 2-5% >1000 mg/dL
Genetic unknown Causing recurrent acute or chronic pancreatitis
Drug-induced <5% Most commonly azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, didanosine, valproic acid, ACEi, mesalamine
Autoimmune <1% Presents as Type I or Type II
ERCP (Iatrogenic) 5-10% of procedures Treated with rectal NSAIDs or temporary pancreatic duct stent placement
Trauma Blunt force trauma to the mid-abodmen Blunt force trauma to the mid-abdomen
Infection <1% Primarily caused by CMV, mumps, or EBV.

May be caused by ascaris or clonorchis

Surgical 5-10% of patients on cardiopulmonary bypass
Obstruction Rare Caused by celiac disease, crohn’s disease, and perpetrated by pancreas divisium or sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Anatomical causes

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and pancreas divisium have been traditionally associated with the development of acute pancreatitis; however, recent data suggests otherwise.[4] Pancreas divisium has been associated with genetic mutations that may be the true underlying cause of pancreatitis. Alternatively, the presence of the abnormal anatomy alone may not predispose patients to acute pancreatitis; however, in lieu of a genetic mutation may superimpose on the existing anatomical variation to contribute in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis.[5][6]

Environmental causes

Chronic alcoholism and smoking have been associated with the development of acute pancreatitis. Though alcohol has been proposed to be pathogenic in combination with the presence of an underlying genetic mutation. Alcoholism causing pancreatitis is more common in males than females. This may be due to the propensity of males to consume alcohol more than females, or due to the genetic mutations occurring more commonly in males.[7][8]

Iatrogenic causes

Common iatrogenic causes of pancreatitis include ERCP procedures as well as use of medication. Hundreds of medications have been implicated in causing pancreatitis; however, the most common drugs include:[9][10]

It is extremely difficult to identify a particular drug which may be responsible for the development of pancreatitis as there are usually multiple possibilities to the underlying etiology of the pancreatitis in patients with comorbidities; however, patients hospitalized for acute pancreatitis are often found to be using one or more drugs associated with the development of the disease.[11][12]

Genetic causes

Several genes have been proposed to play a role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis. While the exact role of every implicated genetic mutation is not fully understood, the following genes have been associated with the development of acute pancreatitis:[13][14]

Common Causes

A common mnemonic for the causes of pancreatitis spells “I get smashed”, an allusion to heavy drinking (one of the many causes):

Causes by Organ System

Cardiovascular Cholesterol embolism, Polyarteritis nodosa
Chemical / poisoning Scorpion sting, Snake bite, Zinc, Ethanol
Dermatologic No underlying causes
Drug Side Effect Asparaginase, Azathioprine, Bexarotene, Bumetanide, Didanosine, Diuretics, Enfuvirtide, Ethanol, Exenatide, Frusemide, Isotretinoin, Linagliptin, Liraglutide, Mesalazine, Metronidazole, NSAIDS, Olsalazine, Oxyphenbutazone, Pentamidine, Sitagliptin, Steroids, Sulfonamides, Thiazide, Valproic acid
Ear Nose Throat No underlying causes
Endocrine Primary hyperparathyroidism
Environmental No underlying causes
Gastroenterologic Bile duct cysts,Cholangiocarcinoma, Choledochal cyst, Choledocholithiasis, Cholelithiasis, Duodenal ulcer, Gallstones , Gastric ulcer, Long common duct, Pancreas divisum, Pancreas duct obstruction, Pancreatic abnormalities, Pancreatic cancer, Pancreatic cysts , Peptic ulcer , Reye syndrome, Hereditary pancreatitis, Cystic fibrosis
Genetic Apolipoprotein C-II deficiency, Cystic fibrosis, Familial hypertriglyceridaemia, Familial partial lipodystrophy type 1 , Hereditary pancreatitis, Lipoprotein lipase deficiency
Hematologic No underlying causes
Iatrogenic Abdominal surgery , Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Ischemia from bypass surgery, Reye’s syndrome
Infectious Disease Ascaris blocking pancreatic outflow, Campylobacter jejuni, Chinese liver fluke, Coxsackie B virus, Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus , HIV-1 disease, Human enterovirus B, Varicella zoster, Mumps, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Teniasis, Varicella-zoster virus
Musculoskeletal / Ortho No underlying causes
Neurologic No underlying causes
Nutritional / Metabolic Hypercalcaemia, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertriglyceridemia, Lipoprotein lipase deficiency, Apolipoprotein C-II deficiency, Familial hypertriglyceridaemia, Familial partial lipodystrophy type 1
Obstetric/Gynecologic No underlying causes
Oncologic Cholangiocarcinoma, Pancreatic cancer
Opthalmologic No underlying causes
Overdose / Toxicity Asparaginase, Azathioprine, Bexarotene, Bumetanide, Didanosine, Diuretics, Enfuvirtide, Ethanol, Exenatide, Frusemide, Linagliptin, Liraglutide, Mesalazine, Metronidazole, NSAIDS, Olsalazine, Oxyphenbutazone, Sitagliptin, Steroids, Sulfonamides, Thiazide, Valproic acid
Psychiatric No underlying causes
Pulmonary Cystic fibrosis
Renal / Electrolyte No underlying causes
Rheum / Immune / Allergy Autoimmune disease , Polyarteritis nodosa, Sytemic lupus erythematosus
Sexual Cystic fibrosis
Trauma Abdominal trauma , Pancreatic trauma
Urologic No underlying causes
Dental No underlying causes
Miscellaneous Excessive alcohol, Hypothermia, Idiopathic, Repeated marathon running

Causes in Alphabetical Order


References

  1. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB (2006). “Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review”. Pancreas. 33 (4): 323–30. doi:10.1097/01.mpa.0000236733.31617.52. PMID 17079934.
  2. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox M (November 17,2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The New England Journal of Medicine: 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202. Retrieved November 25,2016. Check date values in: |access-date=, |date= (help)
  3. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox M (November 17,2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The New England Journal of Medicine: 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202. Retrieved November 25,2016. Check date values in: |access-date=, |date= (help)
  4. Coté GA, Imperiale TF, Schmidt SE, Fogel E, Lehman G, McHenry L; et al. (2012). “Similar efficacies of biliary, with or without pancreatic, sphincterotomy in treatment of idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 143 (6): 1502–1509.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.006. PMID 22982183.
  5. DiMagno MJ, Dimagno EP (2012). “Pancreas divisum does not cause pancreatitis, but associates with CFTR mutations”. Am J Gastroenterol. 107 (2): 318–20. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.430. PMC 3458421. PMID 22306946.
  6. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox M (November 17,2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The New England Journal of Medicine: 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202. Retrieved November 25,2016. Check date values in: |access-date=, |date= (help)
  7. Coté GA, Yadav D, Slivka A, Hawes RH, Anderson MA, Burton FR; et al. (2011). “Alcohol and smoking as risk factors in an epidemiology study of patients with chronic pancreatitis”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 9 (3): 266–73, quiz e27. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.10.015. PMC 3043170. PMID 21029787.
  8. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox M (November 17,2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The New England Journal of Medicine: 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202. Retrieved November 25,2016. Check date values in: |access-date=, |date= (help)
  9. Kaurich T (2008). “Drug-induced acute pancreatitis”. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 21 (1): 77–81. PMC 2190558. PMID 18209761.
  10. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox M (November 17,2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The New England Journal of Medicine: 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202. Retrieved November 25,2016. Check date values in: |access-date=, |date= (help)
  11. Bertilsson S, Kalaitzakis E (2015). “Acute Pancreatitis and Use of Pancreatitis-Associated Drugs: A 10-Year Population-Based Cohort Study”. Pancreas. 44 (7): 1096–104. doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000000406. PMID 26335010.
  12. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox M (November 17,2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The New England Journal of Medicine: 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202. Retrieved November 25,2016. Check date values in: |access-date=, |date= (help)
  13. Whitcomb DC (2013). “Genetic risk factors for pancreatic disorders”. Gastroenterology. 144 (6): 1292–302. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.069. PMC 3684061. PMID 23622139.
  14. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox M (November 17,2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. The New England Journal of Medicine: 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202. Retrieved November 25,2016. Check date values in: |access-date=, |date= (help)
  15. _JAMA_Internal_Medicine_|_Glucagonlike_Peptide_1–Based_Therapies_and_Risk_of_Hospitalization_for_Acute_Pancreatitis_in_Type_2_Diabetes_MellitusA_Population-Based_Matched_Case-Control_StudyGLP-1_and_the_Risk_of_Acute_Pancreatitis_15-0|15.0 _JAMA_Internal_Medicine_|_Glucagonlike_Peptide_1–Based_Therapies_and_Risk_of_Hospitalization_for_Acute_Pancreatitis_in_Type_2_Diabetes_MellitusA_Population-Based_Matched_Case-Control_StudyGLP-1_and_the_Risk_of_Acute_Pancreatitis_15-1|15.1 “JAMA Network | JAMA Internal Medicine | Glucagonlike Peptide 1–Based Therapies and Risk of Hospitalization for Acute Pancreatitis in Type 2 Diabetes MellitusA Population-Based Matched Case-Control StudyGLP-1 and the Risk of Acute Pancreatitis”. Retrieved 2013-02-26.


Template:WS Template:WH

Differentiating Acute Pancreatitis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [2]; Tarek Nafee, M.D. [3]; Iqra Qamar M.D.[4]

Overview

Acute pancreatitis must be differentiated from gallstones, pancreatic cysts, pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatitis.

Differentiating Acute pancreatitis from other Diseases

The following table outlines the major differential diagnoses of abdominal pain.

Abbreviations: RUQ= Right upper quadrant of the abdomen, LUQ= Left upper quadrant, LLQ= Left lower quadrant, RLQ= Right lower quadrant, LFT= Liver function test, SIRS= Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ERCP= Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, IV= Intravenous, N= Normal, AMA= Anti mitochondrial antibodies, LDH= Lactate dehydrogenase, GI= Gastrointestinal, CXR= Chest X ray, IgA= Immunoglobulin A, IgG= Immunoglobulin G, IgM= Immunoglobulin M, CT= Computed tomography, PMN= Polymorphonuclear cells, ESR= Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP= C-reactive protein, TS= Transferrin saturation, SF= Serum Ferritin, SMA= Superior mesenteric artery, SMV= Superior mesenteric vein, ECG= Electrocardiogram, US = Ultrasound

Classification of pain in the abdomen based on etiology Disease Clinical manifestations Diagnosis Comments
Symptoms Signs
Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging
Abdominal causes Inflammatory causes Pancreato-biliary disorders Acute suppurative cholangitis RUQ + + + + + + + N
  • Abnormal LFT
  • WBC >10,000
  • Ultrasound shows biliary dilatation/stents/tumor
  • Septic shock occurs with features of SIRS
Acute cholangitis RUQ + + N
  • Ultrasound shows biliary dilatation/stents/tumor
  • Biliary drainage (ERCP) + IV antibiotics
Acute cholecystitis RUQ + + + Hypoactive Ultrasound shows:
  • Gallstone
  • Inflammation
Acute pancreatitis Epigastric + + ± + ± N
  • Ultrasound shows evidence of inflammation
  • CT scan shows severity of pancreatitis
  • Pain radiation to back
Chronic pancreatitis Epigastric ± ± + + N
  • Increased amylase / lipase
  • Increased stool fat content
  • Pancreatic function test
CT scan
  • Calcification
  • Pseudocyst
  • Dilation of main pancreatic duct
  • Predisposes to pancreatic cancer
Pancreatic carcinoma Epigastric + + + + N

Skin manifestations may include:

Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Primary biliary cirrhosis RUQ/Epigastric + N
  • Increased AMA level, abnormal LFTs
  • ERCP
  • Pruritis
Primary sclerosing cholangitis RUQ + + N ERCP and MRCP shows
  • Multiple segmental strictures
  • Mural irregularities
  • Biliary dilatation and diverticula
  • Distortion of biliary tree
  • The risk of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis is 400 times higher than the risk in the general population.
Cholelithiasis RUQ/Epigastric ± ± ± Normal to hyperactive for dislodged stone
  • Fatty food intolerance
Gastric causes Peptic ulcer disease Diffuse ± + + Positive if perforated Positive if perforated Positive if perforated N
  • Ascitic fluid
    • LDH > serum LDH
    • Glucose < 50mg/dl
    • Total protein > 1g/dl
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Gastritis Epigastric ± + Positive in chronic gastritis + N
Gastroesophageal reflux disease Epigastric ± N N
  • Gastric emptying studies
Gastric outlet obstruction Epigastric ± + Hyperactive
  • Succussion splash
Gastroparesis Epigastric + + ± Hyperactive/hypoactive
  • Scintigraphic gastric emptying
  • Succussion splash
  • Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
  • Full thickness gastric and small intestinal biopsy
Gastrointestinal perforation Diffuse + ± ± + + + ± Hyperactive/hypoactive
  • WBC> 10,000
Dumping syndrome Lower and then diffuse + + + + Hyperactive
  • Postgastrectomy
Intestinal causes Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Acute appendicitis Starts in epigastrium, migrates to RLQ + Positive in pyogenic appendicitis + ± Positive in perforated appendicitis + + Hypoactive
  • Ct scan
  • Ultrasound
  • Positive Rovsing sign
  • Positive Obturator sign
  • Positive Iliopsoas sign
Acute diverticulitis LLQ + ± + + ± + Positive in perforated diverticulitis + + Hypoactive
  • CT scan
  • Ultrasound
Inflammatory bowel disease Diffuse ± ± + + + Normal or hyperactive

Extra intestinal findings:

Irritable bowel syndrome Diffuse ± ± + N Normal Normal Symptomatic treatment
Whipple’s disease Diffuse ± ± + + ± N Endoscopy is used to confirm diagnosis.

Images used to find complications

Extra intestinal findings:
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Toxic megacolon Diffuse + + + ± + Hypoactive CT and Ultrasound shows:
  • Loss of colonic haustration
  • Hypoechoic and thickened bowel walls with irregular internal margins in the sigmoid and descending colon
  • Prominent dilation of the transverse colon (>6 cm)
  • Insignificant dilation of ileal bowel loops (diameter >18 mm) with increased intraluminal gas and fluid
Tropical sprue Diffuse + + + N Barium studies:
  • Dilation and edema of mucosal folds
Celiac disease Diffuse + + Hyperactive US:
  • Bull’s eye or target pattern
  • Pseudokidney sign
  • Gluten allergy
Infective colitis Diffuse + ± + + Positive in fulminant colitis ± ± Hyperactive CT scan
  • Bowel wall thickening
  • Edema
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Colon carcinoma Diffuse/ RLQ/LLQ ± ± + + ±
  • Normal or hyperactive if obstruction present
  • CBC
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)
  • Colonoscopy
  • Flexible sigmoidoscopy
  • Barium enema
  • CT colonography 
  • PILLCAM 2: A colon capsule for CRC screening may be used in patients with an incomplete colonoscopy who lacks obstruction
Hepatic causes Viral hepatitis RUQ + + + Positive in Hep A and E + Positive in fulminant hepatitis Positive in acute + N
  • Abnormal LFTs
  • Viral serology
  • US
  • Hep A and E have fecal-oral route of transmission
  • Hep B and C transmits via blood transfusion and sexual contact.
Liver abscess RUQ + + + + ± + + + ± Normal or hypoactive
  • US
  • CT
Hepatocellular carcinoma/Metastasis RUQ + + +
  • Normal
  • Hyperactive if obstruction present
  • US
  • CT
  • Liver biopsy

Other symptoms:

Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Budd-Chiari syndrome RUQ ± ± Positive in liver failure leading to varices N
Findings on CT scan suggestive of Budd-Chiari syndrome include:
Ascitic fluid examination shows:
Hemochromatosis RUQ Positive in cirrhotic patients N
  • >60% TS
  • >240 μg/L SF
  • Raised LFT
    Hyperglycemia
  • Ultrasound shows evidence of cirrhosis
Extra intestinal findings:
  • Hyperpigmentation
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Arthralgia
  • Impotence in males
  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Hypopituitarism
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Extrahepatic cancer
  • Prone to specific infections
Cirrhosis RUQ + + + + N US
  • Stigmata of liver disease
  • Cruveilhier- Baumgarten murmur
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Peritoneal causes Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Diffuse + Positive in cirrhotic patients + ± + + Hypoactive
  • Ascitic fluid PMN>250 cells/mm³
  • Culture: Positive for single organism
  • Ultrasound for evaluation of liver cirrhosis
Renal causes Pyelonephritis Unilateral + ± + + Hypoactive
  • Urinalysis
  • Urine culture
  • Blood culture
  • CT
  • MRI
  • CVA tenderness
Renal colic Flank pain + N
  • Ultrasound
  • CT scan
Hollow Viscous Obstruction Small bowel obstruction Diffuse + + + + + + ± Hyperactive then absent Abdominal X ray
  • Dilated loops of bowel with air fluid levels
  • Gasless abdomen
  • “Target sign”– , indicative of intussusception
  • Venous cut-off sign” – suggests thrombosis
Volvulus Diffuse + + Positive in perforated cases + + Hyperactive then absent CT scan and abdominal X ray
  • U shaped sigmoid colon
  • “Whirl sign”
Biliary colic RUQ + + N
  • Ultrasound
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Vascular Disorders Ischemic causes Mesenteric ischemia Periumbilical Positive if bowel becomes gangrenous + + + + Positive if bowel becomes gangrenous Positive if bowel becomes gangrenous Hyperactive to absent CT angiography
  • SMA or SMV thrombosis
  • Also known as abdominal angina that worsens with eating
Acute ischemic colitis Diffuse + ± + + + + + + + Hyperactive then absent Abdominal x-ray
  • Distension and pneumatosis

CT scan

  • Double halo appearance, thumbprinting
  • Thickening of bowel
  • May lead to shock
Hemorrhagic causes Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm Diffuse ± + + + + N
  • Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) 
  • Unstable hemodynamics
Intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal hemorrhage Diffuse ± ± + + N
  • ↓ Hb
  • ↓ Hct
  • CT scan
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Gynaecological Causes Tubal causes Torsion of the cyst/ovary RLQ / LLQ + ± ± N
  • Ultrasound
  • Sudden onset & severe pain
Acute salpingitis RLQ / LLQ + ± ± ± N
Cyst rupture RLQ / LLQ + + ± ± N
  • Ultrasound
Pregnancy Ruptured ectopic pregnancy RLQ / LLQ + + + + N
  • Ultrasound
History of
  • Missed period
  • Vaginal bleeding
Extra-abdominal causes Pulmonary disorders Pleural empyema RUQ/Epigastric + ± + N Chest X-ray
  • Pleural opacity
  • Localization of effusion
Physical examination
Pulmonary embolism RUQ/LUQ ± ± N
  • ABGs
  • D-dimer
  • Dyspnea
  • Tachycardia
  • Pleuretic chest pain
Pneumonia RUQ/LUQ + + + ± + Normal or hypoactive
  • ABGs
  • Leukocytosis
  • Pancytopenia
  • CXR
  • CT chest
  • Bronchoscopy
  • Shortness of breath
  • Cough
Cardiovascular disorders Myocardial Infarction Epigastric ± + Positive in cardiogenic shock N ECG

Echocardiogram

  • Wall motion abnormality
  • Wall rupture
  • Septal rupture
  • Chest pain, tightness, diaphoresis

Complications:

References


Template:WSTemplate:WH

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Monish Thuvooru Muthu Kalyanaraman, M.B.B.S[2]

Epidemiology and Demographics

Overview

This microchapter covers the incidence, prevalence, mortality, temporal trends, and demographic distribution (age, sex, race/ethnicity) of acute pancreatitis (AP) at global and national levels. Risk factors for developing AP are covered in a dedicated microchapter; etiology-specific epidemiology is referenced here only insofar as it explains demographic patterns.

Incidence

Global incidence of AP is estimated at 13–49 per 100,000 person-years depending on region and methodology, with higher rates in high-income countries.[1][2] In 2021, the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study estimated 2.75 million incident cases of AP worldwide, with the highest burden in Eastern Europe (age-standardized pancreatitis incidence ~99 per 100,000, including acute and chronic forms).[3][4] A landmark 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis (Iannuzzi et al., 44 studies) found the global incidence is increasing at 3.07% per year (95% CI 2.30%–3.84%), with increases observed in North America (AAPC 3.67%) and Europe (AAPC 2.77%).[2]

In the United States, AP is among the most common GI causes of hospitalization, producing >288,000 admissions annually at a cost exceeding $2.6 billion.[1][5] Hospitalization for AP increased approximately 30% over the past decade.[1] A 2026 US population-based analysis (TriNetX, 120 million individuals) reported age-standardized incidence rising from 23 per 100,000 in 1999 to 117 per 100,000 in 2024 (AAPC 4.81%), though this higher figure likely reflects inclusion of outpatient encounters and coding changes in addition to true incidence increases.[6] When restricted to inpatient admissions only, US incidence estimates are approximately 40–60 per 100,000.[7]

The increase in AP incidence is likely multifactorial, potentially driven by rising rates of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and associated gallstone disease, as well as improved diagnostic recognition and coding.[1][2] A 2026 US study found that alcohol-induced AP was the only etiology with a statistically significant increase in incidence since 2016, particularly among females.[6]

Global trends from GBD 2021 show a nuanced picture: the overall global age-standardized incidence rate has slightly declined (APC −0.25%), but incidence is increasing in low and low-middle SDI countries.[3] This divergence highlights growing disparities in AP burden by socioeconomic development.

Mortality

Overall AP mortality (case fatality) is approximately 1%–2%, consistent with the pooled estimate of 1.97% (95% CI 1.55%–2.39%) from the Iannuzzi 2022 meta-analysis.[1][2] Case fatality has decreased over time due to improvements in critical care and minimally invasive management, but the overall population mortality rate has remained relatively unchanged because of increasing incidence, with approximately 9,000 deaths in 2021 when all pancreatitis (acute and chronic) listed anywhere on the death certificate is considered, though only ~3,300 deaths in 2020 listed acute pancreatitis specifically as the underlying cause.[5][8] In 2021, GBD estimated 122,420 AP deaths globally.[3]

US pancreatitis mortality rates declined 18% from 2006–2019 but rose sharply (25%) from 2019–2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mortality is highest among American Indian/Alaska Native persons and lowest among Asian/Pacific Islander individuals.[5][9]

Deaths from alcohol-associated AP increased 120% from 2011–2020 while non-alcohol AP deaths remained stable. Among racial/ethnic groups, alcohol-associated AP mortality was highest in non-Hispanic Black individuals (0.21/100,000), whereas non-alcohol AP mortality was highest among AI/AN persons (1.13/100,000).[8]

Severity-stratified mortality (persistent organ failure 25%–46%; infected necrosis with organ failure ~35%) is detailed in the Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis microchapter.

Age

AP incidence increases with age. Peak burden occurs in middle-aged and older adults, with GBD data showing the highest rates among those ≥65 years. However, an upward incidence trend has been noted in younger adults aged 15–25.[4]

Pediatric AP is now recognized as more common than previously appreciated. Incidence in children is estimated at 3.6–13.2 per 100,000 depending on methodology (inpatient-only vs. including outpatient encounters).[10][11] A large US private insurance database estimated pediatric AP incidence at 12.3 per 100,000 when outpatient encounters were included.[7] The global pediatric AP incidence is increasing at 5.44% per year (95% CI 0.52%–10.36%), faster than in adults.[2] However, recent US data suggest the incidence may have stabilized since 2007–2014.[7] Biliary/obstructive factors, medications, and systemic diseases are the most common causes of childhood AP, differing from the adult pattern. In the United Kingdom, childhood AP incidence was reported at 0.78 per 100,000/year, with a sevenfold higher rate among Pakistani children (4.55/100,000).[12] Globally, GBD 2021 estimated a pediatric (ages 0–19) pancreatitis age-standardized incidence of 7.18 per 100,000, with declining mortality over time.[13]

Sex

The risk of AP is similar between men and women overall.[1] GBD 2021 data show a male-to-female incidence ratio of approximately 1.27:1 and a mortality ratio of 1.94:1.[4] The higher mortality in men is largely attributable to higher rates of alcohol-related AP.

When stratified by etiology, important sex differences emerge:[1]

  • Gallstone AP is more common in women (reflecting higher gallstone prevalence)
  • Alcohol-related AP is more common in men
  • Hypertriglyceridemic AP, hypercalcemic AP, and malignancy-related AP are more common in men

The dose-response relationship between alcohol and AP also differs by sex: it follows a J-shaped (nonlinear) pattern in women but a monotonic increase in men.[14]

Race and Ethnicity

AP disproportionately affects certain racial and ethnic minority groups:[1]

  • African Americans are approximately 2-fold more likely to develop AP compared with White Americans. They are also less likely to be transferred to tertiary care centers and more likely to live in underserved neighborhoods, implicating social determinants of health.[1]
  • Hispanic patients experience greater rates of organ failure (acute kidney injury and shock) and longer emergency department wait times.[1]
  • American Indian/Alaska Native persons have the highest pancreatitis mortality among all racial/ethnic groups in the US and experienced a sharp mortality increase during 2019–2021.
  • New Zealand Māori have among the highest reported AP incidence rates worldwide, with a higher rate of gallstone pancreatitis compared with non-Māori.[15]
  • Asian individuals generally have the lowest AP prevalence and mortality.

Pancreatitis prevalence in the US is highest among Black and American Indian/Alaska Native individuals across multiple insurance databases.[5]

Healthcare Burden

AP generates substantial healthcare costs. In the US:

  • >288,000 hospital admissions annually[1]
  • $2.6 billion in annual healthcare costs[1]
  • Gallstone AP has higher hospitalization charges than alcohol-related AP ($61,182 vs. $37,982) due to increased use of imaging, ERCP, and longer length of stay[16]
  • Disease severity is the key determinant of healthcare costs
  • Pancreatitis claims-based prevalence was 0.19% among privately insured, 0.48% among Medicare, and 0.44% among Medicaid beneficiaries (2021)[5]

Clinically Actionable Recommendations

  1. Recognize that AP incidence is increasing, particularly alcohol-related AP in recent years, and maintain a broad differential for etiology.
  2. Be aware of racial/ethnic disparities: African American and American Indian/Alaska Native patients face disproportionate AP burden and may benefit from targeted risk factor modification and equitable access to tertiary care.
  3. Consider AP in children presenting with abdominal pain — pediatric AP is no longer rare (incidence overlaps with the lower end of adult ranges).
  4. Recognize that AP mortality, while declining over decades, increased during the COVID-19 pandemic period, potentially reflecting delayed presentations and strained healthcare resources.

High-Yield Clinical Pearls

  • AP is the most common GI cause of hospitalization in the US, with incidence rising ~3%–5% annually.
  • Population-level case fatality is ~1%–2%, but this masks dramatic variation by severity (see Natural History microchapter for organ-failure and infected-necrosis rates).
  • Gallstone AP predominates in women; alcohol-related AP predominates in men — but alcohol-related AP is now increasing in women.
  • African Americans have 2× the AP risk, but American Indian/Alaska Native populations have the highest mortality.
  • Pediatric AP is no longer rare — incidence of 3.6–13.2 per 100,000 overlaps with the lower adult range.
  • Eastern Europe bears the highest global pancreatitis burden, driven largely by alcohol consumption.

Common Pitfalls

  • Assuming AP is rare in children — it is now recognized as one of the more common pediatric GI diagnoses requiring hospitalization.
  • Overlooking racial/ethnic disparities and social determinants of health in AP outcomes.
  • Attributing the entire incidence increase to a true rise in disease without considering coding and diagnostic detection changes.
  • Failing to recognize that overall population mortality has not declined despite lower case fatality, because incidence has increased.

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG; et al. (2024). “American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Am J Gastroenterol. 119 (3): 419–437. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645. PMID 38301252 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Iannuzzi JP, King JA, Leong JH; et al. (2022). “Global Incidence of Acute Pancreatitis Is Increasing Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Gastroenterology. 162 (1): 122–134. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.043. PMID 34687739 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Danpanichkul P, Pang Y, Diaz LA; et al. (2026). “Global, Regional, and National Disparities in the Burden of Acute Pancreatitis and Alcohol-Related Pancreatitis From 2000 to 2021”. Mayo Clin Proc. PMID 41123526 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Zhou B, Zhang J, Li G; et al. (2025). “The Global, Regional, and National Burden of Pancreatitis From 1990 to 2021”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. PMID 40047071 Check |pmid= value (help).
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Unalp-Arida A, Ruhl CE (2025). “Burden of Nonmalignant Liver and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States Population: Rates and Trends”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 23 (10): 1679–1692.e9. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.026.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Simadibrata DM, Al-Fakhouri Z, Alomari L, Wong RCK (2026). “Trends in Incidence and Prevalence of Acute Pancreatitis in the United States: A Population-Based Analysis From 1995 to 2024”. Dig Dis Sci. doi:10.1007/s10620-026-10001-z.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Sellers ZM, MacIsaac D, Yu H; et al. (2018). “Nationwide Trends in Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis Among Privately Insured Children and Non-Elderly Adults in the United States, 2007-2014”. Gastroenterology. 155 (2): 469–478.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.013. PMID 29660323.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Danpanichkul P, Pang Y, Kim D; et al. (2025). “Disproportionately Rising Mortality Rates of Alcohol-Associated Acute Pancreatitis: Analysis From Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Database (2011-2020)”. Pancreatology. 25 (4): 508–515. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2025.05.012. PMID 40447464 Check |pmid= value (help).
  9. Qadri R, Khan M, Karimi H; et al. (2026). “Pancreatitis-Associated Mortality in the United States: A Population-Based Analysis of Trends and Disparities, 1999 to 2023”. Medicine (Baltimore). PMID 42175510 Check |pmid= value (help).
  10. Uc A, Husain SZ (2019). “Pancreatitis in Children”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1969–1978. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.043. PMID 30768987.
  11. Ahmed F, Abu-El-Haija M (2025). “Acute Pancreatitis in Children: It’s Not Just a Simple Attack”. Gastroenterology. 169 (4): 572–584. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.04.001.
  12. Majbar AA, Cusick E, Johnson P; et al. (2016). “Incidence and Clinical Associations of Childhood Acute Pancreatitis”. Pediatrics. 138 (3): e20161198. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1198. PMID 27550983.
  13. Yu M, Dong W (2026). “Trends in the Global, Regional, and National Burden of Pancreatitis Among Children and Adolescents Based on the GBD 2021”. Int J Surg. PMID 41537276 Check |pmid= value (help).
  14. Samokhvalov AV, Rehm J, Roerecke M (2015). “Alcohol Consumption as a Risk Factor for Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and a Series of Meta-Analyses”. EBioMedicine. 2 (12): 1996–2002. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.11.023. PMID 26844279.
  15. Pendharkar SA, Mathew J, Zhao J, Windsor JA, Exeter DJ, Petrov MS (2017). “Ethnic and geographic variations in the incidence of pancreatitis and post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus in New Zealand: a nationwide population-based study”. N Z Med J. 130 (1450): 55–68. PMID 28207730.
  16. Trikudanathan G, Yazici C, Evans Phillips A, Forsmark CE (2024). “Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 167 (4): 673–688. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.052. PMID 38734348 Check |pmid= value (help).
Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Monish Thuvooru Muthu Kalyanaraman, M.B.B.S[2]

Overview

The most common risk factors in the development of acute pancreatitis are gallstones (40%–70% of cases) and alcohol use (~20%–35% of cases). Other important risk factors include smoking, hypertriglyceridemia, obesity and metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, certain medications, genetic variants, post-ERCP status, and pregnancy. Less common risk factors include hypercalcemia, autoimmune disease, infections, anatomic variants, pancreatic tumors, trauma, physical inactivity, ischemic/vascular insults, scorpion envenomation, cannabis use, idiopathic disease (a diagnostic category), celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic kidney disease.

Common Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of acute pancreatitis include gallstones, alcohol, smoking, hypertriglyceridemia, obesity and metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, selected medications, genetic predisposition, post-ERCP status, and pregnancy.

Gallstones (Biliary Disease)

Gallstones are the most common cause of acute pancreatitis, accounting for 40%–70% of cases depending on the population studied.[1] Migrating gallstones cause transient obstruction of the pancreatic duct.[2][3] Risk factors for gallstone-related acute pancreatitis mirror those for gallstone disease itself: female sex, increasing age, obesity, rapid weight loss, pregnancy, and certain medications (e.g., estrogen, octreotide).[3][4] In a large Chinese cohort (n=512,891), prevalent gallbladder disease carried an HR of 2.42 (95% CI 2.03–2.88) for acute pancreatitis.[5] Biliary acute pancreatitis has the lowest recurrence rate among etiologies (approximately 12%), further reduced to approximately 7% after cholecystectomy.[4]

Alcohol

Alcohol is the second most common cause of acute pancreatitis (~20%–35% of cases depending on the population studied).[1][4] Prolonged heavy use (≥4–5 drinks/day for >5 years) is typically required; the overall lifetime risk among heavy drinkers is only 2%–5%, indicating that cofactors (genetic, smoking, metabolic) are necessary.[3][4][6] Binge drinking without chronic heavy use has traditionally been considered insufficient to precipitate acute pancreatitis, though one Swedish cohort found that consuming ≥5 drinks on a single occasion increased risk by 52% after adjustment, suggesting the relationship may be more nuanced.[3][6] The type of alcohol does not affect risk.[3] The dose-response relationship differs by sex: monotonic increase in men but J-shaped (nonlinear) in women.[6] Clinicians should be cautious about attributing acute pancreatitis to alcohol in moderate drinkers, as this produces stigmatization and delays identification of the true etiology.[4] Alcohol potentiates pancreatic injury from other environmental and genetic risk factors.[4][6]

Smoking

Smoking is an independent risk factor for acute pancreatitis, separate from its strong association with alcohol use.[7][8][9][10][6] A meta-analysis of 10 prospective studies found current smokers had RR 1.49 (95% CI 1.29–1.72) for acute pancreatitis versus never smokers, with a dose-response relationship (RR 1.30 per 10 cigarettes/day).[10] A Korean population-based cohort (n=4.2 million) confirmed dose-dependent risk (HR 1.66 for ≥20 cigarettes/day) and showed that smoking cessation reduces risk (HR 1.34 for quitters versus 1.66 for continuous smokers).[8] The combination of heavy drinking and smoking increases acute pancreatitis risk beyond either exposure alone, though estimates vary widely (RR 1.40–11.40) due to heterogeneous definitions of exposure.[11] After two decades of cessation, risk returns to nonsmoker levels for non-gallstone acute pancreatitis.[7] Mendelian randomization studies confirm that genetic predisposition to smoking independently elevates pancreatitis risk.[6]

Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG)

Hypertriglyceridemia accounts for 2%–7% of acute pancreatitis cases and is the third leading cause.[4] Levels >1,000 mg/dL strongly predispose to acute pancreatitis, but recent data show even moderate elevations increase risk.[4] Familial chylomicronemia syndrome carries up to a 76% lifetime risk of acute pancreatitis.[4] HTG-associated acute pancreatitis is associated with the highest complication rates among all etiologies (highest rates of non-mild disease, ICU admission, and mortality).[12][13] Triglycerides may be falsely low at presentation if the patient has been fasting.[4] Recurrent episodes can be triggered by even modest elevations, emphasizing aggressive long-term triglyceride control.[4] Recent RCT analyses show that lowering triglycerides by ≥40% (e.g., with apoC-III-targeting drugs) reduces acute pancreatitis risk.[13] Secondary causes of hypertriglyceridemia (poorly controlled diabetes, alcohol, pregnancy, medications such as estrogen, tamoxifen, retinoids, protease inhibitors) should be identified and addressed.[13]

Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome

Obesity (BMI ≥30) is an independent risk factor for both the occurrence and severity of acute pancreatitis.[3][14] A 2025 meta-analysis (89 studies) found obesity significantly increased risk of severe acute pancreatitis (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.37–6.83), local complications (OR 2.68), and systemic complications (OR 2.40).[14] Waist circumference is positively associated with acute pancreatitis risk (HR 1.35 per 1-SD increase).[5] Metabolic syndrome components (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia) have additive effects: individuals with ≥3 metabolic risk factors had an HR of 3.41 (95% CI 2.46–4.72) for acute pancreatitis compared with those with none.[5]

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes increases the risk of acute pancreatitis 2- to 3-fold.[3] Diabetes also increases ICU admission odds (OR 1.65) and severe acute pancreatitis risk (OR 1.49).[14] The relationship is bidirectional: acute pancreatitis itself leads to new-onset diabetes in approximately 23% of patients (covered in the Natural History microchapter).

Medications (Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis)

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis accounts for a minority of cases.[3][4] A systematic analysis of 1,060 cases found antineoplastics (16.9%), antibiotics (12.1%), and anticonvulsants (9.7%) were the most common drug classes.[15] The drugs most strongly associated with acute pancreatitis are azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, didanosine (withdrawn from the US market), valproic acid, ACE inhibitors, and mesalamine.[3][4] Drug-induced acute pancreatitis is generally mild, but severity varies by drug class—corticosteroids (40% mortality), antiprotozoals (31% mortality), and antiretrovirals (26% mortality) carry the highest severity and mortality (based on small case series of 19–30 patients per drug class; interpret with caution).[15] Drug-induced acute pancreatitis occurs at a younger age than acute pancreatitis from other causes, and 21.6% of cases occur in children.[15]

Regarding incretin-based therapies: Meta-analyses of cardiovascular outcomes trials show DPP-4 inhibitors are likely associated with a modest increase in pancreatitis risk (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.12–2.37; moderate certainty), whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists show no increased risk (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68–1.35).[16][17] A large 2025 Medicare/commercial claims study (>1.2 million patients per cohort) confirmed no increased acute pancreatitis risk with GLP-1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors compared with SGLT2 inhibitors.[18] However, both GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors modestly increase biliary disease events, which could indirectly precipitate biliary acute pancreatitis.[18] Caution is warranted in patients with a history of pancreatitis.[17]

Genetic/Hereditary Factors

Mutations in PRSS1 (cationic trypsinogen), SPINK1, CFTR, CTRC (chymotrypsin C), CASR (calcium-sensing receptor), and CLDN2 (claudin-2) are associated with acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis.[3][19] These may act as cofactors—e.g., CLDN2 variants synergize with alcohol.[3] Genetic factors account for approximately 50% of acute recurrent pancreatitis and approximately 75% of chronic pancreatitis in children.[20][21] A recent pediatric study reported pathogenic variants in acute pancreatitis, acute recurrent pancreatitis, and chronic pancreatitis patients at varying rates; the expected pattern is increasing prevalence from first-episode acute pancreatitis to acute recurrent pancreatitis to chronic pancreatitis (exact percentages should be verified against the original source).[21] A large multicenter INSPPIRE study (n=944 pediatric acute recurrent pancreatitis/chronic pancreatitis patients, 2026) using 14-gene next-generation sequencing found that 74% carried at least one genetic risk variant, with variants in PRSS1, CTRC, and SPINK1 significantly accelerating progression to chronic pancreatitis.[22] Hereditary pancreatitis (PRSS1 mutations) is autosomal dominant with approximately 80% penetrance and carries substantially increased lifetime risk of pancreatic cancer.[3]

ERCP (Post-Procedural)

Acute pancreatitis occurs after 5%–10% of ERCPs.[2] Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis include female sex, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, difficult cannulation, pancreatic duct injection, and young age.[23] Prevention strategies (rectal NSAIDs, pancreatic duct stenting) are covered in the treatment microchapter.

Pregnancy

Acute pancreatitis during pregnancy is uncommon (0.2–2.2 per 1,000 pregnancies) but carries high maternal-fetal morbidity.[24][25] Up to 60% of cases occur in the third trimester or early postpartum.[24] Gallstones account for 65%–100% of pregnancy-associated acute pancreatitis, followed by hypertriglyceridemia (which physiologically increases 2- to 4-fold during pregnancy).[24][26] Maternal mortality has decreased but remains concerning; fetal loss can reach 23% and adverse fetal outcomes up to 57%.[24][25] Incidence increases in the first 2 years postpartum.[26]

Less Common Risk Factors

Less common risk factors in the development of acute pancreatitis include hypercalcemia, autoimmune pancreatitis, infections, anatomic variants, pancreatic or periampullary tumors, abdominal trauma, physical inactivity, ischemic/vascular causes, scorpion envenomation, cannabis use, idiopathic disease (diagnostic category), celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic kidney disease.

  • Hypercalcemia: Any cause (hyperparathyroidism, malignancy) can precipitate acute pancreatitis.[27]
  • Autoimmune pancreatitis: Type 1 (IgG4-related) and type 2; distinct entity with specific treatment.[27]
  • Infections: Viral (mumps, CMV, hepatitis B, HIV), parasitic (Ascaris), and bacterial.[27]
  • Anatomic variants: Pancreas divisum and choledochocele—controversial as independent causes; may act as cofactors.[3]
  • Pancreatic/periampullary tumors: Should be considered in patients >40 years with unexplained acute pancreatitis.[1]
  • Abdominal trauma: Blunt or penetrating; also iatrogenic (post-surgical).[27]
  • Physical inactivity: Each 4 MET-h/day higher activity associated with HR 0.95 for acute pancreatitis.[5]
  • Ischemic/vascular causes: Perioperative hypotension, cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, and vasculitis (e.g., polyarteritis nodosa, SLE) are uncommon but recognized precipitants.[27][4]
  • Scorpion envenomation: Recognized cause in tropical/subtropical regions (e.g., Trinidad, Brazil, India); mechanism involves direct pancreatic toxicity.[27]
  • Cannabis use: Emerging data, including Mendelian randomization evidence, suggest cannabis (particularly synthetic cannabinoids) may be an underrecognized risk factor.[6]
  • Idiopathic: No identifiable cause is found in 15%–25% of cases after standard workup — this is a diagnostic category rather than a discrete risk factor. Further evaluation (EUS, MRCP, genetic testing) may be warranted.[1][4]
  • Celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease: Associated with acute pancreatitis, likely through shared inflammatory or obstructive mechanisms.[4]
  • Chronic kidney disease: End-stage renal disease and advanced CKD are associated with increased acute pancreatitis risk and worse outcomes.[4]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG; et al. (2024). “American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Am J Gastroenterol. 119 (3): 419–437. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD (2021). “Acute Pancreatitis: A Review”. JAMA. 325 (4): 382–390. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.20317. PMID 33496779 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM (2016). “Acute Pancreatitis”. N Engl J Med. 375 (20): 1972–1981. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1505202. PMID 27959604.
  4. 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 Trikudanathan G, Yazici C, Evans Phillips A, Forsmark CE (2024). “Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 167 (4): 673–688. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.052.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Pang Y, Kartsonaki C, Turnbull I; et al. (2018). “Metabolic and Lifestyle Risk Factors for Acute Pancreatitis in Chinese Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study of 0.5 Million People”. PLoS Med. 15 (8): e1002618. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002618. PMID 30086132.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Wang F, Görgülü K, Algül H, Hu LH (2026). “The Role of Alcohol in Pancreatic Diseases: A Comprehensive Perspective”. Gastroenterology. 170 (2): 268–286. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.08.025.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Sadr-Azodi O, Andrén-Sandberg Å, Orsini N, Wolk A (2012). “Cigarette Smoking, Smoking Cessation and Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Population-Based Study”. Gut. 61 (2): 262–7. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300566. PMID 21836026.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Lee JM, Han KD, Lee SH; et al. (2023). “The Association Between Smoking, Changes in Smoking Behavior, and Acute Pancreatitis: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 38 (3): 451–459. doi:10.1111/jgh.16061.
  9. Ye X, Lu G, Huai J, Ding J (2015). “Impact of Smoking on the Risk of Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. PLoS One. 10 (4): e0124075. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124075. PMID 25879541.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Aune D, Mahamat-Saleh Y, Norat T, Riboli E (2019). “Tobacco Smoking and the Risk of Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies”. Pancreatology. 19 (8): 1009–1022. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2019.09.004.
  11. Adeniran EA, Jiang Y, Yadav D; et al. (2025). “Multiple Substance Use and the Risk of Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review”. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 18. PMID 40873658 Check |pmid= value (help).
  12. Bálint ER, Fűr G, Kiss L; et al. (2020). “Assessment of the Course of Acute Pancreatitis in the Light of Aetiology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Sci Rep. 10 (1): 17936. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74943-8. PMID 33087771 Check |pmid= value (help).
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Subramanian S, Soran H, Sikora Kessler A; et al. (2025). “Prevention and Treatment of Hypertriglyceridemia-Mediated Acute Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review”. Eur J Intern Med. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2025.106648.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Dobszai D, Obeidat M, Szalai EÁ; et al. (2025). “Metabolic Syndrome Components Individually Worsen the Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Front Endocrinol. 16: 1690754. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1690754.
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Meczker Á, Hanák L, Párniczky A; et al. (2020). “Analysis of 1060 Cases of Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 159 (5): 1958–1961.e8. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.016.
  16. Kanie T, Mizuno A, Takaoka Y; et al. (2021). “Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors for People With Cardiovascular Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (10): CD013650. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013650.pub2.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Pratley R, Saeed ZI, Casu A (2024). “Incretin Mimetics and Acute Pancreatitis: Enemy or Innocent Bystander?”. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 40 (5): 404–412. doi:10.1097/MOG.0000000000001057.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Fang YE, Paik JM, Ortega-Montiel J; et al. (2025). “Risk of Acute Pancreatitis and Biliary Events After Initiation of Incretin-Based Medications in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes”. Diabetes Care. 48 (12): 2127–2137. doi:10.2337/dc25-1840.
  19. Mayerle J, Sendler M, Hegyi E; et al. (2019). “Genetics, Cell Biology, and Pathophysiology of Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1951–1968.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.081.
  20. Uc A, Husain SZ (2019). “Pancreatitis in Children”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1969–1978. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.043.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Ahmed F, Abu-El-Haija M (2025). “Acute Pancreatitis in Children: It’s Not Just a Simple Attack”. Gastroenterology. 169 (4): 572–584. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.04.001.
  22. Abu-El-Haija M, Zhang W, Wang F; et al. (2026). “Pancreatitis Risk Genes Play a Major Role in Pediatric Pancreatitis: Insights From the INSPPIRE Study”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. PMID 42303027 Check |pmid= value (help).
  23. Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aber L; et al. (2020). “ESGE Guideline: Prophylaxis of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis”. Endoscopy. 52 (3): 248–263. doi:10.1055/a-1091-7639. PMID 32126565 Check |pmid= value (help).
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 Lightner AL, Mathis KL (2022). “Surgery in Pregnancy”. Am J Gastroenterol. 117 (10S): 53–59. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001961.
  25. 25.0 25.1 Kumar-M P, Singh AK, Samanta J; et al. (2022). “Acute Pancreatitis in Pregnancy and Its Impact on the Maternal and Foetal Outcomes: A Systematic Review”. Pancreatology. 22 (2): 210–218. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2021.12.007.
  26. 26.0 26.1 Maringhini A, Rossi M, Patti R, Maringhini M, Vassallo V (2024). “Acute Pancreatitis During and After Pregnancy: A Review”. J Clin Med. 13 (7): 2028. doi:10.3390/jcm13072028.
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.5 Boxhoorn L, Voermans RP, Bouwense SA; et al. (2020). “Acute Pancreatitis”. Lancet. 396 (10252): 726–734. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6. PMID 32891214 Check |pmid= value (help).
Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: ; Tarek Nafee, M.D. [2]


Overview

There is no established screening recommendations for pancreatitis in the general population.

Screening

There is no established screening recommendations for pancreatitis in the general population.



Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Monish Thuvooru Muthu Kalyanaraman, M.B.B.S[2]

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Overview

This section covers the clinical course of acute pancreatitis (AP) stratified by severity, the two-phase mortality model, local and systemic complications per the Revised Atlanta Classification, prognostic determinants, severity scoring systems, long-term sequelae (recurrence, progression to chronic pancreatitis, and new-onset diabetes), and vascular complications. Management of complications and severity classification definitions are covered in dedicated microchapters.

Natural History

Clinical Course by Severity

Approximately 80% of AP episodes are mild and self-limiting, resolving within 3–7 days with supportive care.[1][2] Approximately 20% develop moderately severe or severe disease, with prolonged hospitalization and increased mortality.[2]

  • Mild AP: No organ failure or local complications. Symptoms typically improve within 48 hours; patients tolerate oral diet and are discharged within a week.[1][3][2]
  • Moderately severe AP: Transient organ failure (<48 hours) and/or local complications. Mortality is approximately 2%. Course may be prolonged over weeks due to local complications.[3][2]
  • Severe AP: Overall mortality of severe/necrotizing AP is approximately 15%–20%; mortality with persistent organ failure is 25%–46%, and is substantially higher with multiorgan failure.[1][3][4][5]

Two-Phase Mortality Model

Deaths in AP occur in two distinct phases:[5][6]

  1. Early phase (first 1–2 weeks): Deaths result from primary organ failure driven by SIRS and the systemic inflammatory cascade. This is “sterile” organ failure unrelated to infection. The window of opportunity for intervention is narrow, and treatment is largely supportive.[5]
  2. Late phase (after 2 weeks): Deaths result from infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) and secondary septic organ failure. Among patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, approximately one-third develop infected necrosis, typically after the first 10–14 days. Late mortality is driven by sepsis and its consequences. However, a large Dutch cohort study (n=639) found that mortality among patients with organ failure alone was paradoxically higher than in those with organ failure plus infected necrosis (44% vs. 29%, p=0.04). This difference disappeared after excluding very early deaths within 10 days of admission (28% vs. 34%, p=0.33), suggesting that the paradox is driven by fulminant early sterile organ failure deaths occurring before infection has time to develop, rather than a protective effect of infected necrosis.[7][3]

In a population-based study, the median interval from AP onset to death was 6 days, and from organ failure onset to death was 3 days.[5] Notably, a large multicenter study found that early-onset persistent organ failure was not associated with higher mortality compared with late-onset persistent organ failure, and no association was found between duration of organ failure and mortality — suggesting that the timing of organ failure may be less prognostically important than its persistence.[7] However, data on the prognostic impact of organ failure duration are conflicting. Schepers et al. (2019) found no association between duration of organ failure and mortality, whereas Singh et al. (2021) found that duration was significantly associated with mortality (p=0.006), and that sequential multiple organ failure carried the worst prognosis (mortality 69% vs. 30% for simultaneous and 12% for single organ failure).[8]

Key Determinants of Disease Course

  • Persistent organ failure (>48 hours) is the prime determinant of mortality. Overall mortality in patients with persistent organ failure is approximately 40%.[5]
  • Transient organ failure (<48 hours) carries a mortality of 1.4%–10%.[5]
  • SIRS at admission is highly predictive of organ failure and severe disease.[1]
  • Infected necrosis substantially worsens prognosis — mortality of 15%–35% overall; however, infected necrosis with concomitant organ failure carries approximately 35% mortality whereas infected necrosis without organ failure carries only ~1.4% mortality. Approximately one-third of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis develop infected necrosis, typically 10–14 days after onset. Risk factors include >50% pancreatic necrosis (aOR 3.61), persistent organ failure (aOR 11.71), invasive mechanical ventilation (uOR 12.24, high certainty), gallstone etiology (aOR 2.35), and delayed enteral nutrition (aOR 2.09) (moderate-to-high certainty evidence).[9][1][10][11]
  • Obesity (BMI >30) is independently associated with increased severity and complications.[1]

Complications

Local Complications

Local complications are classified by the Revised Atlanta Classification based on morphology and timing:[1][4]

Timing Fluid collections Necrotic collections
<4 weeks Acute peripancreatic fluid collection (APFC) Acute necrotic collection (ANC)
≥4 weeks (encapsulated) Pancreatic pseudocyst Walled-off necrosis (WON)

Key points:

  • APFCs are common and usually resolve spontaneously.[4]
  • Pseudocysts are encapsulated fluid collections without solid necrotic material, arising from ductal disruption.[4]
  • ANCs contain variable amounts of fluid and necrotic debris. Necrosis is purely peripancreatic in ~50% of cases.[4]
  • WON is a mature, encapsulated collection containing necrotic material; it is the target of intervention when infected.[4][3]
  • Infected necrosis should be suspected when clinical deterioration occurs (new fever, rising inflammatory markers) or when gas is visible within a necrotic collection on CT.[1]
  • Disconnected duct syndrome may occur as a long-term sequela of necrotizing pancreatitis when a segment of viable pancreas is isolated from the main duct by necrosis, predisposing to persistent collections or fistula.[4][3]

Other local complications:

  • Abdominal compartment syndrome: Sustained intra-abdominal pressure >20 mmHg with organ failure; consider in ventilated patients with severe AP.[12]
  • Gastric outlet/duodenal obstruction from inflammatory mass effect.[12]
  • Pancreatic duct disruption leading to pancreatic ascites or fistula.[12]

Vascular Complications

  • Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT): Reported incidence varies by population studied: approximately 4%–7% in unselected AP cohorts, 13% (95% CI 7%–23%) in a 2024 meta-analysis with systematic imaging, and 16%–22% in dedicated necrotizing pancreatitis cohorts. Most commonly involves the splenic vein, followed by portal and superior mesenteric veins. Usually asymptomatic; serious complications (variceal bleeding, ascites) are infrequent. The role of anticoagulation remains controversial. A 2022 meta-analysis (Anis et al.) found that anticoagulation improved recanalization rates (OR 0.51), but the largest prospective necrotizing pancreatitis cohort (Sissingh et al. 2024, n=432) found no difference in radiological or clinical outcomes with anticoagulation, with spontaneous recanalization in 62%. A 2025 global Delphi consensus favored anticoagulation for portal vein and SMV thrombosis but reached no consensus for isolated splenic vein thrombosis. Risks of bleeding into necrotic collections must be weighed, particularly in the acute setting. Long-term, patients may develop sinistral portal hypertension and gastric fundal varices.[3][13][14][15][16]
  • Pseudoaneurysm: Incidence 4%–6% in necrotizing pancreatitis; most commonly involves the splenic artery and gastroduodenal artery. Rupture causes life-threatening hemorrhage with mortality historically reported at 34%–52%, though more recent series report 14%–23%.[17]

Systemic Complications

  • Pulmonary: Pleural effusions (most common systemic complication), atelectasis, ARDS.[12]
  • Cardiovascular: Hypotension, hypovolemic shock, nonspecific ST-T changes mimicking MI, pericardial effusion.[12]
  • Renal: Acute kidney injury (prerenal from hypovolemia; intrarenal from systemic inflammation).[12]
  • Hematologic: DIC.[12]
  • Metabolic: Hypocalcemia (fat saponification), hyperglycemia.[12]
  • Other: Abdominal compartment syndrome, intestinal ileus/obstruction, GI bleeding.[12]

Prognosis

Mortality

  • Overall AP mortality: ~1%–2% at the population level, though hospitalized cohort studies report rates up to 5%.[3][1][18]
  • Mild AP: Near-zero mortality.[3]
  • Moderately severe AP: ~2% mortality.[3]
  • Severe AP: Overall mortality of severe/necrotizing AP is approximately 15%–20%; mortality with persistent organ failure is 25%–46%, and is substantially higher with multiorgan failure.[3][4][5]
  • Sterile necrosis with organ failure: ~20% mortality; sterile necrosis without organ failure carries near-zero mortality.[11]
  • Infected necrosis: 15%–35% mortality overall; however, infected necrosis with concomitant organ failure carries approximately 35% mortality whereas infected necrosis without organ failure carries only ~1.4% mortality.[1][10][11]

Post-discharge mortality is clinically significant: in a large multicenter cohort (n=2,613), first-year post-discharge mortality was 5.5%, with 3.0% dying in the first 90 days — nearly matching in-hospital mortality (3.5%). A Danish population-based study (n=28,759) confirmed a 5.0% 90-day post-discharge mortality (aHR 7.62 vs. matched controls), with risk remaining elevated for up to 5 years. Age, comorbidities, severity, and admission creatinine and glucose were independent risk factors for post-discharge death. This underscores the importance of structured post-discharge follow-up.[19][20]

Prognostic Factors

Per the ACG 2024 Guidelines, clinicians should assess multiple risk factors rather than relying on any single test or score:[1]

Patient factors:

  • Age >55 years
  • Obesity (BMI >30)
  • Altered mental status
  • Comorbid disease (especially type 2 diabetes)

Clinical/laboratory markers:

  • SIRS at admission (highly predictive of organ failure)[1]
  • Persistent SIRS >48 hours
  • BUN >20 mg/dL or rising BUN (marker of hypovolemia)
  • Hematocrit >44% or rising hematocrit
  • Elevated/rising creatinine
  • CRP (peaks at 48–72 hours; useful but delayed)[1]

Radiographic markers:

  • Pleural effusions or pulmonary infiltrates
  • Multiple or extensive extrapancreatic collections

Severity Scoring Systems

No single scoring system is established as a gold standard. All have limitations including cumbersomeness and high false-positive rates.[3] Scoring tools should supplement, not replace, ongoing clinical assessment.[3]

Score Variables Timing Key Limitations
BISAP 5 variables (BUN >25, mental status, SIRS ≥2, age >60, pleural effusion) First 24 hours Limited validation in severe disease; does not include imaging
APACHE II 12 physiologic variables + age + chronic health Admission and serial Complex; designed for ICU patients; not routinely obtained in non-ICU setting
Ranson 11 criteria (5 at admission, 6 at 48 hours) Requires 48 hours Cannot be recalculated; delayed; cumbersome
Glasgow/Imrie 8 criteria 48 hours Similar limitations to Ranson
Modified Marshall Respiratory, renal, cardiovascular Serial Used to define organ failure per Atlanta; simple

BISAP scoring: Score ≥3 associated with substantially increased mortality (0: 0.1%, 1: 0.4%, 2: 1.6%, 3: 3.6%, 4: 7.4%, 5: 9.5%).[21]

The ACG 2024 Guidelines emphasize that the presence of SIRS at admission and signs of hypovolemia (rising BUN, elevated hematocrit) are the most practical early predictors of severe disease.[1]

Long-Term Sequelae

Recurrence

The risk of recurrent AP after an index episode is approximately 17%–22% overall, with substantially higher rates in alcohol-associated (~29%), hypertriglyceridemia-associated (~30%), and idiopathic (~15%–25%) etiologies, and lower rates in biliary AP (~12%), which is further reduced to ~7% after cholecystectomy.[22][23][3] Independent risk factors for recurrence include alcohol etiology, smoking, and history of necrosis.[2] Persistent organ failure >48 hours during the index episode independently predicts recurrence (HR 3.52, 95% CI 1.22–10.19).[24]

Progression to Chronic Pancreatitis

  • 10% of patients with a first AP episode progress to chronic pancreatitis (CP).[2][25]
  • 36% of patients with recurrent AP develop CP.[2][25]
  • Risk factors: alcohol use (HR 8.79), smoking (HR 2.50), male sex, CTSI severity, and ≥3 recurrences.[25][24]
  • Nearly three-quarters of patients diagnosed with CP have a prior AP diagnosis.[2]
  • There is an increased lifetime risk of pancreatic cancer in those with AP (adjusted HR ~3.8 for pancreatic cancer mortality in post-pancreatitis diabetes), likely driven by chronic inflammation.[2][26]

New-Onset Diabetes

New-onset diabetes after AP is more common than previously recognized:

  • 23% of patients develop diabetes following a first AP episode (meta-analysis of 24 studies).[4][27]
  • 15% develop diabetes within 12 months, with risk increasing >2-fold at 5 years.[2][27]
  • Earlier meta-analyses suggested that diabetes development was not strongly associated with AP severity; however, a larger 2023 meta-analysis found significantly higher odds of prediabetes/DM after severe and moderately severe AP (OR 4.32). Both immune/inflammatory mechanisms beyond simple beta-cell destruction and necrosis-related injury likely contribute.[2][27][28]
  • Preliminary longitudinal data show that among patients with normal baseline endocrine function after a single AP episode, 54% develop prediabetes or diabetes by year 4, with progression most dynamic in the first 2 years (preliminary data; awaiting full publication).[29]
  • Hyperglycemia during AP (peak glucose >200 mg/dL) is a strong predictor of early-onset diabetes (42.9% vs. 3.5%) (preliminary data; awaiting full publication).[30]

Exocrine Insufficiency

Pooled prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency is 19% after mild AP and 33% after severe AP.[4] Manifests as steatorrhea, malabsorption, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiency. Diagnosed by fecal elastase-1 or 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test.[4]

Clinically Actionable Recommendations

  1. Assess severity early and serially: Evaluate SIRS criteria, BUN, hematocrit, and mental status at admission and at 24–48 hours. Do not rely solely on scoring systems.[1]
  2. Recognize the two-phase model: Early mortality is driven by sterile organ failure (supportive care); late mortality by infected necrosis (source control).[5]
  3. Suspect infected necrosis when clinical deterioration occurs after initial improvement (typically >7–10 days), particularly new/persistent fever or rising inflammatory markers.[1]
  4. Monitor for vascular complications in necrotizing pancreatitis: consider CT angiography for unexplained hemorrhage (pseudoaneurysm).[2]
  5. Screen for diabetes in the 12 months to 5 years following AP, regardless of severity.[2]
  6. Assess for exocrine insufficiency in patients with persistent GI symptoms after AP, especially after severe/necrotizing disease.[4]

High-Yield Clinical Pearls

  1. Persistent organ failure >48 hours is the single most important prognostic factor — not the extent of necrosis per se.
  2. SIRS at admission is the best early bedside predictor of severe disease.
  3. Rising BUN within 24 hours is a simple, reliable marker of hypovolemia and poor prognosis.
  4. Necrosis cannot be reliably assessed on CT before 72 hours — early CT for severity staging is not recommended.
  5. Infected necrosis typically develops >7–10 days into the disease course; new fever or deterioration in a recovering patient should raise suspicion.
  6. ~1 in 4 patients develops diabetes after AP, with higher risk after severe disease — plan post-discharge metabolic follow-up.
  7. Pseudoaneurysm rupture is a rare but rapidly fatal complication — consider CT angiography for any unexplained drop in hemoglobin in a patient with necrotizing pancreatitis.

Common Pitfalls

  1. Over-relying on scoring systems (e.g., Ranson, APACHE II) instead of serial clinical assessment, SIRS monitoring, and trending BUN/hematocrit.
  2. Obtaining early CT (within 48 hours) to assess severity — necrosis is not yet visible and the CT will likely be falsely reassuring.
  3. Equating “no necrosis on CT” with mild disease — organ failure can occur without necrosis.
  4. Neglecting long-term follow-up — failing to screen for diabetes, exocrine insufficiency, and chronic pancreatitis after discharge.
  5. Anticoagulating isolated splenic vein thrombosis without individual risk-benefit assessment — no consensus exists; bleeding risk into necrotic collections must be weighed.
  6. Using obsolete terminology (phlegmon, abscess, hemorrhagic pancreatitis) rather than current Revised Atlanta Classification terminology.

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG; et al. (2024). “American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Am J Gastroenterol. 119 (3): 419–437. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645. PMID 38301252 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD (2021). “Acute Pancreatitis: A Review”. JAMA. 325 (4): 382–390. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.20317. PMID 33464334 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 Trikudanathan G, Yazici C, Evans Phillips A, Forsmark CE (2024). “Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 167 (4): 673–688. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.052. PMID 38734348 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 Boxhoorn L, Voermans RP, Bouwense SA; et al. (2020). “Acute Pancreatitis”. Lancet. 396 (10252): 726–734. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6. PMID 32682482 Check |pmid= value (help).
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 Garg PK, Singh VP (2019). “Organ Failure Due to Systemic Injury in Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 2008–2023. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.041. PMID 30802407.
  6. Baron TH, Morgan DE (1999). “Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis”. N Engl J Med. 340 (18): 1412–1417. doi:10.1056/NEJM199905063401807. PMID 10235545.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Schepers NJ, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG; et al. (2019). “Impact of Characteristics of Organ Failure and Infected Necrosis on Mortality in Necrotising Pancreatitis”. Gut. 68 (6): 1044–1051. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314657. PMID 29950344.
  8. Singh AK, Samanta J, Shukla J; et al. (2021). “Impact of Different Patterns of Organ Failure on Mortality in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis”. Pancreas. 50 (7): 1030–1036. doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000001880. PMID 34629457 Check |pmid= value (help).
  9. Tran A, Fernando SM, Rochwerg B; et al. (2022). “Prognostic Factors Associated With Development of Infected Necrosis in Patients With Acute Necrotizing or Severe Pancreatitis-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 92 (5): 940–948. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000003502. PMID 34936587 Check |pmid= value (help).
  10. 10.0 10.1 Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA (2020). “American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis”. Gastroenterology. 158 (1): 67–75.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064. PMID 31479658.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Leppäniemi A, Tolonen M, Tarasconi A; et al. (2019). “2019 WSES Guidelines for the Management of Severe Acute Pancreatitis”. World J Emerg Surg. 14: 27. doi:10.1186/s13017-019-0247-0. PMID 31210778.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 Oppenlander KE, Chadwick C, Carman K (2022). “Acute Pancreatitis: Rapid Evidence Review”. Am Fam Physician. 106 (1): 44–50. PMID 35877133 Check |pmid= value (help).
  13. Borbély RZ, Szalai EÁ, Philip BM; et al. (2024). “The Risk of Developing Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Acute Pancreatitis Increases 3 days After Symptom Onset: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. United European Gastroenterol J. 12 (6): 678–690. doi:10.1002/ueg2.12550. PMID 38400822 Check |pmid= value (help).
  14. Anis FS, Adiamah A, Lobo DN, Sanyal S (2022). “Incidence and Treatment of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 37 (3): 446–454. doi:10.1111/jgh.15711. PMID 34657310 Check |pmid= value (help).
  15. Sissingh NJ, Timmerhuis HC, Groen JV; et al. (2024). “Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Nationwide Prospective Cohort”. HPB (Oxford). 26 (4): 548–557. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.01.011. PMID 38336603 Check |pmid= value (help).
  16. Scott M, Ghazanfar M, Windsor J; et al. (2025). “The Management of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Acute Pancreatitis: A Global DELPHI Consensus Study”. HPB (Oxford). 27 (3): 343–351. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.002. PMID 39741058 Check |pmid= value (help).
  17. Trikudanathan G, Wolbrink DRJ, van Santvoort HC; et al. (2019). “Current Concepts in Severe Acute and Necrotizing Pancreatitis: An Evidence-Based Approach”. Gastroenterology. 156 (7): 1994–2007.e3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.269. PMID 30986341.
  18. Iannuzzi JP, King JA, Leong JH; et al. (2022). “Global Incidence of Acute Pancreatitis Is Increasing Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Gastroenterology. 162 (1): 122–134. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.043. PMID 34687739 Check |pmid= value (help).
  19. Czapári D, Váradi A, Farkas N; et al. (2023). “Detailed Characteristics of Post-Discharge Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis”. Gastroenterology. 165 (3): 682–695. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.05.028. PMID 37211309 Check |pmid= value (help).
  20. Davidsen L, Knoph CS, Cook ME, Drewes AM, Olesen SS (2025). “Increased Early Post-Discharge Mortality in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis”. United European Gastroenterol J. 13 (4): 631–639. doi:10.1002/ueg2.12766. PMID 39918008 Check |pmid= value (help).
  21. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X; et al. (2008). “The Early Prediction of Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Large Population-Based Study”. Gut. 57 (12): 1698–1703. doi:10.1136/gut.2008.152702. PMID 19118453.
  22. Li S, Gao L, Gong H; et al. (2023). “Recurrence Rates and Risk Factors for Recurrence After First Episode of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Eur J Intern Med. 116: 72–81. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2023.06.006. PMID 37330318 Check |pmid= value (help).
  23. Hajibandeh S, Jurdon R, Heaton E; et al. (2023). “The Risk of Recurrent Pancreatitis After First Episode of Acute Pancreatitis in Relation to Etiology and Severity of Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Analysis”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 38 (10): 1718–1733. doi:10.1111/jgh.16264. PMID 37366550 Check |pmid= value (help).
  24. 24.0 24.1 Park JY, Bang S, Jeon TJ; et al. (2025). “Risk of and Factors Influencing the Progression From Acute to Recurrent Acute to Chronic Pancreatitis”. Pancreatology. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2025.04.006. PMID 40280847 Check |pmid= value (help).
  25. 25.0 25.1 25.2 Sankaran SJ, Xiao AY, Wu LM; et al. (2015). “Frequency of Progression From Acute to Chronic Pancreatitis and Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis”. Gastroenterology. 149 (6): 1490–1500.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.066. PMID 26248032.
  26. Petrov MS, Olesen SS (2023). “Metabolic Sequelae: The Pancreatitis Zeitgeist of the 21st Century”. Gastroenterology. 165 (5): 1122–1135. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.07.025. PMID 37625497 Check |pmid= value (help).
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 Das SL, Singh PP, Phillips AR; et al. (2014). “Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus After Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Gut. 63 (5): 818–831. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305062. PMID 24000203.
  28. Zahariev OJ, Bunduc S, Kovács A; et al. (2023). “Risk Factors for Diabetes Mellitus After Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Front Med (Lausanne). 10: 1257222. doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1257222. PMID 38264039 Check |pmid= value (help).
  29. Mikó A, Farkas N, Vincze Á; et al. (2026). “Progression of Pancreatic Morphologic Changes and Endocrine Dysfunction After Acute Pancreatitis: Preliminary Results of the Longitudinal GOULASH-Plus Cohort Study”. Gastroenterology.
  30. Dungan KM, Chinchilli VM, Pichardo-Lowden A; et al. (2026). “Hyperglycemia During Acute Pancreatitis and Progression to Early-Onset Diabetes After Recovery: Preliminary Findings From the DREAM Study”. Diabetes Care.
Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Abdominal X ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Related Chapters

Template:Gastroenterology de:Akute Pankreatitis it:Pancreatite acuta no:Akutt pankreatitt sl:Akutni pankreatitis


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH