Health Dictionary AI Health Chat Find an Online Doctor

Tuberculosis


For patient information, click here.

This page is about clinical aspects of the disease.  For microbiologic aspects of the causative organism(s), see Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mashal Awais, M.D.[2]; Mohamed Riad, M.D.[3]; Maheep Singh Sangha, M.B.B.S.; Somal Khan; João André Alves Silva, M.D. [4]; Alejandro Lemor, M.D. [5]; Ammu Susheela, M.D. [6]; Tarek Nafee, M.D. [7]; Sara Mehrsefat, M.D. [8]; Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[9]; Zaida Obeidat, M.D. Synonyms and keywords: TB, Tb, tb

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Alejandro Lemor, M.D. [2]; João André Alves Silva, M.D. [3]; Ammu Susheela, M.D. [4]

Overview

Tuberculosis (abbreviated as TB or Tuberculosis) is a common infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis most commonly involves the lungs as the organism thrives in high oxygen environments, but it can also cause disease in the central nervous system, the lymphatic system, the circulatory system, the genitourinary system, bones, joints and even the skin. Over one-third of the world’s population has been exposed to M. tuberculosis, and new infections occur at a rate of one per second. Not all individuals exposed to the bacterium develop clinically overt tuberculosis infection; in fact, asymptomatic, latent TB infection discovered by screening is more common. Approximately, one in ten latent infections progresses to active (symptomatic) TB disease, which, if left untreated, carries mortality rates of up to 50%. Symptoms include shortness of breath, hemoptysis, fever, chills, night sweats, and weight loss. Several treatment regimens are available for the latent and active forms of TB. Classically, a prolonged course of 6-9 months of a single agent (rifampin or isoniazid) is administered to patients with latent TB, while a more aggressive course that consists of 4 major anti-tuberculous agents (rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, pyrazinamide) is reserved for patients with active disease.

Historical Perspective

Classification

TB Classification System

  • As per CDC (Centers of Disease Control and Prevention), the clinical classification system for TB used in the United States is based on the pathogenesis of the disease.
  • This classification system provides clinicians the opportunity to keep an eye on the development of TB in their patients.
  • Health care providers should follow with state and local laws and regulations requiring the reporting of TB disease.
  • All persons with Class 3 or Class 5 TB should be reported directly to the local or state health department.
  • A patient should not have a Class 5 classification for more than 3 months.
Class Type Description
0 *No TB exposure
*Not infected
*No history of TB exposure and no evidence of M. tuberculosis infection or disease
*Negative reaction to TST or IGRA
1 *TB exposure
*No evidence of infection
*History of exposure to M. tuberculosis
*Negative reaction to TST (Tuberculin skin tests) or IGRA (an interferon gamma release assay blood test) (given at least 8 to 10 weeks after exposure)
2 *TB infection
*No TB disease
*Positive reaction to TST or IGRA
*Negative bacteriological studies (smear and cultures)
*No bacteriological or radiographic evidence of active TB disease
3 *TB clinically active *Positive culture for M. tuberculosis OR
*Positive reaction to TST or IGRA, plus clinical, bacteriological, or radiographic evidence of current active TB
4 *Previous TB disease (not clinically active) *May have past medical history of TB disease
*Abnormal but stable radiographic findings
*Positive reaction to the TST or IGRA
*Negative bacteriologic studies (smear and cultures)
*No clinical or radiographic evidence of current active TB disease
5 *TB suspected *Signs and symptoms of active TB disease, but medical evaluation not complete

Pathophysiology

Causes

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural history, complications and prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X-Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Special conditions

  • Medical therapy for tuberculosis in special conditions include HIV co-infection and extra pulmonary manifestations.
  • Different approaches are taken for patients taking ART and those who do not take ART.
  • Although WHO recommends the same drug regimen for pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations, various stages of skeletal tuberculosis are managed differently.
  • For patients with renal or liver diseases, the first line of drugs are substituted with second-line drugs to prevent complications.

Drug-resistant

Children

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost effectiveness of therapy

Future or investigational therapy

References

Template:WH

Template:WS
Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mashal Awais, M.D.[2]; João André Alves Silva, M.D. [3]

Overview

Tuberculosis has been detected for a long time. The earliest unambiguous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was in the remains of bison, dated 18,000 BC.[1] However, whether tuberculosis originated in cattle and then transferred to humans, or diverged from a common ancestor, is unclear.[2] Through history tuberculosis has had many names including phthisis and Wasting disease, which were mostly derived from its symptoms. Robert Koch identified the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 1882. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, tuberculosis was considered an endemic disease of the urban poor and a public healthcare issue. In 1946, the development of the antibiotic streptomycin made the cure possible. In the 1980s, the drug-resistant strains appeared increasingly eliminating the hope of cure.

Historical Perspective

Tubercular decay has been found in the spines of Egyptian mummies. Pictured: Egyptian mummy in the British MuseumAdapted from Wikimedia Commons[3]

TB was present in prehistoric humans and the evidence of infection was found in the skeletal remains 4000 BC, in addition to the spines of mummies showing tubercular decay from 3000-2400 BC.[4] Phthisis is a Greek term for tuberculosis; around 460 BC. In terms of Hippocrates point of view,  phthisis was the most widespread disease of the time involving fever and coughing up blood, which was almost always fatal.[5] TB was present in South America for about 2,000 years evidenced by some genetic studies.[6] In South America, the earliest evidence of tuberculosis was linked to the Paracas-Caverna culture (circa 750 BC to circa 100 AD).[7]

Egyptian mummies, that dates back to 2400 BC, showed skeletal deformities characteristic of tuberculosis of spine (Pott’s lesions) and those findings were documented clearly in early Egyptian art.[8]

In the Ancient Greece TB was identified and named Phtisis. Hippocrates recognized it as a fatal disease especially for young adults. Isocrates was the first to suggest that TB is considered an infectious disease, while Aristotle suggested its contagious in oxes and pigs.[9]

Along time ago, Since tuberculosis was similar to the idea of consumption of the infected patients with fever, hemoptysis, pallor, and severe wasting, tuberculosis was called consumption. Other names are:[10][11][10][12]

Folklore

tuberculosis was sometimes considered as as vampirism before the industrial revolution. When one family member died from it, the other members became infected and died slowly. People had a false belief that this occurs because the first victim drains the life from the other family members. Moreover, people who had TB had symptoms such as red, swollen eyes (which also causes photosensitivity), pale skin and hemoptysis that are similar to what people knew about vampires. This suggested the idea that the only way for the afflicted to replenish this loss of blood was by sucking blood.[13] people also attributed it to being forced, nightly, to attend fairy revels, so that the victim wasted away due to lack of rest.[14] Similarly, but rarely, it was attributed to the victims being ‘hagridden’ – being transformed into horses by witches (hags) to travel to their nightly meetings leading to lack of rest.[14]

In the 19th century. Many people believed TB caused a sensation of euphoria called ”Spes phthisica” or ”hope of the consumptive”. It was believed that artists affected with TB had bursts of creativity with TB progression. It was also believed that TB sufferers were having a final burst of energy just before their death that made women more beautiful and men more creative.[15]

Study and Treatment

Dr. Robert Koch discovered the tuberculosis bacilli.Adapted from Wikimedia Commons[3]

In 1020s, Ibn Sina (Avicenna), with his book The Canon of Medicine, was the first physician to identify pulmonary tuberculosis as a contagious disease and suggest that it could spread through contact with soil and water.[16][17] He developed the method of quarantine to reduce the spread of tuberculosis.[18]

Although Dr Richard Morton established that the pulmonary form was associated with ‘tubercles’ in 1689,[19][20] due to the variation of its symptoms, TB was not identified as a single disease until the 1820s and was not named ‘tuberculosis‘ until 1839 by J. L. Schönlein.[21] During the years 1838-1845, Dr. John Croghan, the owner of Mammoth Cave, brought some tuberculosis sufferers into the cave to treat them with the constant temperature and purity of the cave air; however, they died within a year.[22] The first TB sanatorium opened in 1859 in Görbersdorf, Germany (today Sokołowsko, Poland) by Hermann Brehmer.[23]

Hermann Lebert published his project Traite Pratique des Maladies Scrofuleuses et Tuberculeuses in 1849, reporting that the TB or “King’s evil” was a childhood disease that can affect multiple body’s sites such as skin, eyes, ears, joints, and bones, causing ulceration and suppuration.[24]

Robert Koch identified and deascribed the bacillus causing tuberculosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, on March 24, 1882 for which He received the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine in 1905.[25] Koch did not identify that bovine (cattle) and human tuberculosis were the same infection, which delayed considering infected milk as a source of infection. Later on, this source was eliminated by the process of milk pasteurization. Koch identified a glycerine extract of the tubercle bacilli as in 1890, calling it ‘tuberculin’. It was not accurate, but was later adapted as a test for pre-symptomatic tuberculosis.[26]

The first achievement in tuberculosis immunization was ‘BCG’ (Bacillus of Calmette and Guerin) that was developed from attenuated bovine-strain tuberculosis by Albert Calmette and Camille Guerin in 1906. The BCG vaccine was first used on humans in 1921 in France, and after World War II, BCG received approval in the USA, Great Britain, and Germany.

Tuberculosis, or ‘consumption’ was considered an endemic disease of the urban poor and a public healthcare issue. In 1815, one in four deaths in England was of consumption; by 1918 one in six deaths in France were still caused by TB. In the 20th century, the number of deaths due to TB was 100 million people.[27] After the establishment in the 1880s that the disease was contagious, TB was reported as a notifiable disease in Britain.[23]

Public health campaigns tried to halt the spread of TBAdapted from Wikimedia Commons[3]


In the United States, concern about the spread of tuberculosis played a role in the movement to prohibit public spitting except into spittoons.

In Europe, deaths from TB decreased from 500 out of 100,000 in 1850 to 50 out of 100,000 by 1950. public health improvements had an impact regarding decreasing tuberculosis cases even before the development of antibiotics, but the disease was still representing a significant harm to public health.[28]

In 1946, the development of the antibiotic streptomycin made the cure possible. Before the discovery of this drug, the only treatment besides sanatoria were surgical interventions, such as the pneumothorax technique – in the form of collapsing an infected lung to rest it and allow lesions to heal – which was of little benefit and was largely stopped by the 1950s.[29] The emergence of multidrug-resistant TB has again introduced surgery as part of the treatment for these infections. Here, surgical removal of lung cavities will reduce the number of bacteria in the lungs, as well as increase the exposure of the remaining bacteria to drugs in the bloodstream, which is thought to increase the effectiveness of the chemotherapy.[30]

In the 1980s, the drug-resistant strains appeared increasingly eliminating the hope of cure. For example, tuberculosis cases in Britain, numbering around 117,000 in 1913, had fallen to around 5,000 in 1987, but cases increased again, reaching 6,300 in 2000 and 7,600 cases in 2005.[31] As a result of the elimination of public health facilities in New York and the emergence of HIV, there was another TB resurgence in the late 1980s.[32]

References

  1. Rothschild B, Martin L, Lev G, Bercovier H, Bar-Gal G, Greenblatt C, Donoghue H, Spigelman M, Brittain D (2001). “Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA from an extinct bison dated 17,000 years before the present”. Clin Infect Dis. 33 (3): 305–11. PMID 11438894.
  2. Pearce-Duvet J (2006). “The origin of human pathogens: evaluating the role of agriculture and domestic animals in the evolution of human disease”. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 81 (3): 369–82. PMID 16672105.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 “Wikimedia Commons”.
  4. Zink A, Sola C, Reischl U, Grabner W, Rastogi N, Wolf H, Nerlich A (2003). “Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNAs from Egyptian mummies by spoligotyping”. J Clin Microbiol. 41 (1): 359–67. PMID 12517873.
  5. Hippocrates. Aphorisms. Accessed 07 October 2006.
  6. Konomi N, Lebwohl E, Mowbray K, Tattersall I, Zhang D (2002). “Detection of mycobacterial DNA in Andean mummies”. J Clin Microbiol. 40 (12): 4738–40. PMID 12454182.
  7. “South America: Prehistoric Findings”. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Vol. 98 (Suppl.I) January 2003. Retrieved on 2007-02-08.
  8. MORSE D, BROTHWELL DR, UCKO PJ (1964). “TUBERCULOSIS IN ANCIENT EGYPT”. Am Rev Respir Dis. 90: 524–41. doi:10.1164/arrd.1964.90.4.524. PMID 14221665.
  9. Barberis I, Bragazzi NL, Galluzzo L, Martini M (2017). “The history of tuberculosis: from the first historical records to the isolation of Koch’s bacillus”. J Prev Med Hyg. 58 (1): E9–E12. PMC 5432783. PMID 28515626.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Tuberculosis Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed.
  11. Rudy’s List of Archaic Medical Terms English Glossary of Archaic Medical Terms, Diseases and Causes of Death. Accessed 09 Oct 06
  12. Disseminated tuberculosis NIH Medical Encyclopedia. Accessed 09 Oct 06
  13. Sledzik P, Bellantoni N (1994). “Brief communication: bioarcheological and biocultural evidence for the New England vampire folk belief”. Am J Phys Anthropol. 94 (2): 269–74. PMID 8085617.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Katharine Briggs, An Encyclopedia of Fairies “Consumption” (Pantheon Books, 1976) p. 80. ISBN 0-394-73467-X
  15. Lawlor, Clark. “Transatlantic Consumptions: Disease, Fame and Literary Nationalism in the Davidson Sisters, Southey, and Poe”. Studies in the Literary Imagination, Fall 2003. Available at findarticles.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-08.
  16. Y. A. Al-Sharrah (2003), “The Arab Tradition of Medical Education and its Relationship with the European Tradition”, Prospects 33 (4), Springer.
  17. George Sarton, Introduction to the History of Science.
    (cf. Dr. A. Zahoor and Dr. Z. Haq (1997). Quotations From Famous Historians of Science, Cyberistan.)
  18. David W. Tschanz, MSPH, PhD (August 2003). “Arab Roots of European Medicine”, Heart Views 4 (2).
  19. Who Named It? Léon Charles Albert Calmette. Retrieved on 6 October 2006.
  20. Trail R (1970). “Richard Morton (1637–1698)”. Med Hist. 14 (2): 166–74. PMID 4914685.
  21. Zur Pathogenie der Impetigines. Auszug aus einer brieflichen Mitteilung an den Herausgeber. [Müller’s] Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin. 1839, page 82.
  22. Kentucky: Mammoth Cave long on history. CNN. 27 February 2004. Accessed 08 October 2006.
  23. 23.0 23.1 McCarthy OR (2001). “The key to the sanatoria”. J R Soc Med. 94 (8): 413–7. PMID 11461990.
  24. Barberis I, Bragazzi NL, Galluzzo L, Martini M (2017). “The history of tuberculosis: from the first historical records to the isolation of Koch’s bacillus”. J Prev Med Hyg. 58 (1): E9–E12. PMC 5432783. PMID 28515626.
  25. Nobel Foundation. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1905. Accessed 07 October 2006.
  26. Waddington K (2004). “To stamp out “so terrible a malady”: bovine tuberculosis and tuberculin testing in Britain, 1890–1939″. Med Hist. 48 (1): 29–48. PMID 14968644.
  27. Torrey EF and Yolken RH. 2005. Their bugs are worse than their bite. Washington Post, April 3, p. B01.
  28. [[Medical Research Council (UK)|]]. MRC’s contribution to Tuberculosis research. Accessed 02 July 2007.
  29. Wolfart W (1990). “[Surgical treatment of tuberculosis and its modifications—collapse therapy and resection treatment and their present-day sequelae]”. Offentl Gesundheitswes. 52 (8–9): 506–11. PMID 2146567.
  30. Lalloo U, Naidoo R, Ambaram A (2006). “Recent advances in the medical and surgical treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis”. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 12 (3): 179–85. PMID 16582672.
  31. “Tuberculosis – Respiratory and Non-respiratory Notifications, England and Wales, 1913-2005”. Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections. 21 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-08-01.
  32. Paolo W, Nosanchuk J (2004). “Tuberculosis in New York city: recent lessons and a look ahead”. Lancet Infect Dis. 4 (5): 287–93. PMID 15120345.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mashal Awais, M.D.[2]; João André Alves Silva, M.D. [3]

Overview

Tuberculosis can be classified into 6 main categories according to exposure, symptoms, and diagnostic testing. The classification ranges from Class 0, in people with no previous exposure to TB and negative tuberculin skin testing and/or interferon-gamma release assay (2 methods of screening for TB), to Class 3 for active TB infection and Class 5 for suspected TB infection based on signs and symptoms of the disease. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has also designed a special classification for immigrants and refugees according to the risk of infection.

Classification

Below is a table of the current classification system of tuberculosis (TB), according to its pathogenesis:[1]

Class Type of Tuberculosis Description

0

No TB exposure
Not infected

No history of TB exposure
A negative TST or IGRA

1

TB exposure
No evidence of infection

History of TB exposure
A negative TST (given at least 8-10 weeks after exposure) or IGRA

2

TB infection
No TB disease

Positive TST or IGRA
Negative smears and cultures (if done)
Absent clinical picture of active TB disease or abnormal x-ray findings

3

Clinically active TB

Positive culture (if done) for M. tuberculosis
Positive TST or IGRA, and clinical, bacteriological, or x-ray evidence of TB disease

4

Previous TB disease (not clinically active)

Medical history of TB disease
Abnormal but stable x-ray findings
Positive TST or IGRA
Negative smears and cultures (if done)
Absent clinical picture of active TB disease or abnormal x-ray findings

5

Suspected TB

Clinical manifestations of TB disease, but incomplete evaluation. The diagnosis s pending. The patient should not be in this class for more than three months.

CDC TB Classification for Immigrants and Refugees

Based on the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), tuberculosis for immigrants and refugees s classified into the following categories: [2]

Class Description Travel Clearance

No TB Classification

Applicants with normal tuberculosis screening examinations. No discernible HIV infection and normal CXR.

Valid for 6 months from evaluation

Class A TB

All applicants who have tuberculosis disease including applicants with extrapulmonary TB. In addition, CXR indicates pulmonary TB disease, regardless of sputum smear and culture results.

Not cleared for travel until treatment is completed. Exceptions are available for granted waivers.
Class B0 TB, Pulmonary Applicants who were previously diagnosed with TB or came to the physician during the TB treatment course. Additionally, successful completion of the Division of Global Migration and Quarantine (DGMQ) prior to immigration is required. It can be valid for 3 months from the last negative culture results.

Class B1 TB, Pulmonary

No treatment:

  • Have negative acid-fast bacilli sputum smears
  • Have negative cultures
  • Are not diagnosed with tuberculosis
  • They can initiate tuberculosis treatment after immigration

Completed treatment:

  • Applicants who had a previous diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and successfully completed directly observed therapy prior to immigration
  • The cover sheet must include whether the initial sputum smears and cultures were positive and if drug susceptibility testing results are available
It can be valid for 3 months from the last negative culture results.

Class B1 TB, Extrapulmonary

Applicants with evidence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, with normal CXR and negative sputum smears and cultures.
The anatomic site of infection should be documented

It can be Valid for 3 months from the last negative culture results.

Class B2 TB, LTBI Evaluation

Applicants who have a TST ≥10 mm or positive IGRA but otherwise tuberculosis evaluation is negative
The TST reaction size or IGRA result, the applicant’s status regarding latent TB infection (LTBI) treatment, and the medication(s) used must be included
Applicants with more than one TST or IGRA, all results and dates must be ncluded
Contacts with TST ≥5 mm or positive IGRA should be classified according to this classification (if they are not already Class B1 TB, Pulmonary)

Valid for 6 months from completion of evaluation.

Class B3 TB, Contact Evaluation

Applicants who have been in contact of a known tuberculosis case
The size of the applicant’s TST reaction or IGRA result must be included
The name, source case, alien number, relationship to contact, and type of tuberculosis must be included.

Valid for 6 months from completion of the evaluation.


Risk Classification Necessity of testing Frequency of testing
Low Risk Settings where Tb infected individuals are unlikely to be present Not required unless there has been exposure to TB
Medium Risk Settings where health care workers (HCWs) are likely to encounter individuals with TB Testing should be repeated every year
Potential Ongoing Transmission Settings wehere person to person transmission of TB was documented in the past year Testing should be repeated every 8 weeks until making sure that there has been no ongoing transmission.


References

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mashal Awais, M.D.[2], João André Alves Silva, M.D. [3]

Overview

Transmission of M. tuberculosis occurs when individuals with active pulmonary disease cough, speak, sneeze or sing expelling the infectious droplets. The mycobacterium tuberculosis favors the upper lung lobes due to the high oxygen level. Tuberculosis is a prototypical granulomatous infection. The granuloma surrounds the mycobacteria and prevents their dissemination and facilitates the immune cell interaction. Within the granuloma, CD4 T lymphocytes release chemokines that activate local macrophages and recruit other immune cells..

Pathogenesis

Transmission of M. tuberculosis occurs when individuals with active pulmonary disease cough, speak, sneeze or sing expelling the infectious droplets that can pass to the terminal bronchioles and alveoli then phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages where they can replicate in the endosomes of alveolar macrophages. As a part of the immune response by these macrophages, the alveolar macrophages release cytokines that recruits further macrophages, neutrophils, and monocytes, surrounding the bacilli. Despite having a very low infectious dose (ID<200 bacteria), 90% of the infected immunocompetent individuals are asymptomatic. In most cases, the bacteria may either be eliminated or enclosed within a granuloma. The granuloma is a structured, radial aggregation of macrophages, epithelioid cells, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and fibroblasts that prevents the spreading of mycobacteria and enhances interaction of the immune cells.[1] The primary site of infection in the lung is called the Ghon focus that is mainly located in either the upper part of the lower lobe, or the lower part of the upper lobe.[1][2]

Primary Infection

The infected macrophages are transported through the lymphatics to the regional lymph nodes in the immunocompetent individuals. However, with impaired immune response, these macrophages can pass through the bloodstream to enter any part of the body. Those foci of primary infection usually resolve without any consequences, but they can act as a foci of M. tuberculosis dissemination. There are particular organs that are more susceptible to bacterial replication as well as being potential metastatic foci which include:[1][2]

Although TB is a systemic disease and all organs can be affected, the heart, pancreas, skeletal muscles and thyroid are rarely involved.[3] In a few cases, when the infectious dose is high and antigens concentration in the primary focus is high, the immune response and hypersensitivity can lead to necrosis and calcification of this lesion, and these primary calcified foci are then called Ranke complex.[1][4]

Progression of the Primary Infection

Primary foci of infection can enter the large pulmonary lymph nodes. These may lead to:[1]

  • In non-caucasian children, elderly patients and HIV/AIDS, the immune response is impaired, consequently the primary focus of infection can deteriorate into progressive primary disease, with advancing pneumonia.
  • In young children, the onset of immune response may be delayed after the bacterial dissemination resulting in military tuberculosis. Bacteria can spread directly from the primary focus, or from the Weigart focus (metastatic focus adjacent to a pulmonary vein) through the blood.[1][7]

Immunopathogenesis

There are two types of immune response against tuberculosis that include the innate and acquired immune responses. However, the cell-mediated immune response predominates over the humoral type.

Innate Immune Response

Initially, The immune response generated against M. tuberculosis is minimal, enabling it to replicate inside the alveolar macrophages forming the Ghon focus, or metastatic foci. Recognition and phagocytosis of the M. tuberculosis bacilli by the alveolar macrophages occurs through interaction with certain receptors that are located on the surface of macrophages:[8]

Acquired Immunity and Granuloma Formation

Following inhalation of contaminated aerosols, M. Tuberculosis moves to the lower respiratory tract where it is recognized by alveolar macrophages. This recognition is mediated by a set of surface receptors (see text), which drive the uptake of the bacteria and trigger innate immune signaling pathways leading to the production of various chemokines and cytokines (a). Epithelial cells and neutrophils can also produce chemokines in response to bacterial products (not represented). This promotes the recruitment of other immune cells (more macrophages, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes) to the infection site (b). They organize in a spherical structure with infected macrophages in the middle surrounded by various categories of lymphocytes (mainly CD4+, CD8+, and γ/δ T cells). Macrophages (MP) can fuse to form MGCs or differentiate into lipid-rich foamy cells (FM). B lymphocytes tend to aggregate in follicular-type structures adjacent to the granuloma ((c), see text for details). The bacteria can survive for decades inside the granuloma in a latent state. Due to some environmental (e.g., HIV infection, malnutrition, etc.) or genetic factors, the bacteria will reactivate and provoke the death of the infected macrophages. A necrotic zone (called caseum due to its milky appearance) will develop in the center of the granuloma (d). Ultimately the structure will disintegrate allowing the exit of the bacteria, which will spread in other parts of the lungs, and more lesions will be formed. The infection will also be transmitted to other individuals due to the release of the infected droplets by coughing (e).[9]

Molecular Pathogenesis


[(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumor_necrosis_factor_alpha#mediaviewer/File:TNF_signaling.jpg)][11]

Once within alveolar macrophages, M. tuberculosis uses multiple mechanisms in order to survive:[1]

Transmission

After contact with a patient having the active TB, and inhalation of the M. tuberculosis, the risk of developing active tuberculosis is low with a life-time risk of about 10%.[12] The probability of transmission between individuals depends on the number of expelled infectious droplets the ventilation, the duration of the exposure, immunity, and the virulence of the M. tuberculosis strain.[13] The probability of transmitting the infection is highest during the first years of getting the infection. After that, it decreases.[14]

In rare occasions, the mycobacteria can be transmitted by other ways apart from the respiratory route in which, the formation of foci in the regional lymph nodes frequently occurs. Those routes include:[1]

Associated Conditions

AIDS

  • HIV infected patients, particularly those having low CD4 lymphocytes counts, are more likely to develop reactivation of latent tuberculosis. Moreover, when an individual has been recently infected with M. tuberculosis, they progress rapidly into active disease.[1][16][17] The correlation between AIDS and the risk of TB infection is still not fully understood.[1]

Patients with AIDS are more prone to get pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Extrapulmonary disease in AIDS patients has characteristic manifestations, such as:[1]

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 Mandell, Gerald (2010). Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier. ISBN 0443068399.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Herrmann J, Lagrange P (2005). “Dendritic cells and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: which is the Trojan horse?”. Pathol Biol (Paris). 53 (1): 35–40. PMID 15620608.
  3. Agarwal R, Malhotra P, Awasthi A, Kakkar N, Gupta D (2005). “Tuberculous dilated cardiomyopathy: an under-recognized entity?”. BMC Infect Dis. 5 (1): 29. PMID 15857515.
  4. Grosset J (2003). “Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the extracellular compartment: an underestimated adversary”. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 47 (3): 833–6. PMID 12604509.
  5. Stead WW, Lofgren JP, Warren E, Thomas C (1985). “Tuberculosis as an endemic and nosocomial infection among the elderly in nursing homes”. N Engl J Med. 312 (23): 1483–7. doi:10.1056/NEJM198506063122304. PMID 3990748.
  6. Murray JF (1990). “Cursed duet: HIV infection and tuberculosis”. Respiration. 57 (3): 210–20. PMID 2274719.
  7. Kim J, Park Y, Kim Y, Kang S, Shin J, Park I, Choi B (2003). “Miliary tuberculosis and acute respiratory distress syndrome”. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 7 (4): 359–64. PMID 12733492.
  8. Aderem A, Underhill DM (1999). “Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages”. Annu Rev Immunol. 17: 593–623. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.593. PMID 10358769.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Silva Miranda M, Breiman A, Allain S, Deknuydt F, Altare F (2012). “The tuberculous granuloma: an unsuccessful host defense mechanism providing a safe shelter for the bacteria?”. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012: 139127. doi:10.1155/2012/139127. PMC 3395138. PMID 22811737.
  10. 10.0 10.1 “Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha”.
  11. “TNF Alpha”. Missing or empty |url= (help)
  12. Glaziou P, Falzon D, Floyd K, Raviglione M (2013). “Global epidemiology of tuberculosis”. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 34 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1333467. PMID 23460002.
  13. “Causes of Tuberculosis”. Mayo Clinic. 2006-12-21. Retrieved 2007-10-19.
  14. Lawn SD, Zumla AI (2011). “Tuberculosis”. Lancet. 378 (9785): 57–72. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62173-3. PMID 21420161.
  15. Zumla A, Raviglione M, Hafner R, von Reyn CF (2013). “Tuberculosis”. N Engl J Med. 368 (8): 745–55. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1200894. PMID 23425167.
  16. Daley CL, Small PM, Schecter GF, Schoolnik GK, McAdam RA, Jacobs WR; et al. (1992). “An outbreak of tuberculosis with accelerated progression among persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. An analysis using restriction-fragment-length polymorphisms”. N Engl J Med. 326 (4): 231–5. doi:10.1056/NEJM199201233260404. PMID 1345800.
  17. Bouvet E, Casalino E, Mendoza-Sassi G, Lariven S, Vallée E, Pernet M; et al. (1993). “A nosocomial outbreak of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium bovis among HIV-infected patients. A case-control study”. AIDS. 7 (11): 1453–60. PMID 8280411.
  18. Shafer RW, Kim DS, Weiss JP, Quale JM (1991). “Extrapulmonary tuberculosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection”. Medicine (Baltimore). 70 (6): 384–97. PMID 1956280.
  19. Meintjes G, Lawn SD, Scano F, Maartens G, French MA, Worodria W; et al. (2008). “Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: case definitions for use in resource-limited settings”. Lancet Infect Dis. 8 (8): 516–23. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70184-1. PMC 2804035. PMID 18652998.
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.8 “Public Health Image Library (PHIL), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mashal Awais, M.D.[2]; João André Alves Silva, M.D. [3]

This page is about microbiologic aspects of the organism(s).  For clinical aspects of the disease, see Tuberculosis.

Synonyms and keywords: M. Tuberculosis

Overview

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the bacterium responsible for tuberculosis. M. tuberculosis is an obligate aerobe, non-encapsulated, non-motile, acid-fast bacillus. . M. tuberculosis is one of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, which also includes bacteria, such as M. bovis and M. africanum. The bacterium has a very slow rate of replication, and its genetic variations account for the different strains and the growing drug resistance. M. tuberculosis has tropism for different kinds of human cells, with preference for cells of the lung. The main natural reservoir for M. tuberculosis are Human beings; however, the bacteria can also infect other species.

Taxonomy

Computer-generated image of a cluster of rod-shaped drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria. Image provided by the CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [1]
Thin agar culture plates reveal the results of a drug susceptibility test on Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria Image provided by the CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2]

Cellular organisms; bacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinobacteridae; Actinomycetales; Corynebacterineae; Mycobacteriaceae; Mycobacterium; Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex; M. tuberculosis[3]

Biology

Tropism

There is no particular tissue tropism for M. tuberculosis and it can infect almost all human tissues. However, M. tuberculosis prefers tissues with high levels of oxygen , hence, pulmonary tuberculosis has the highest rate. [4]

Natural Reservoir

The main natural reservoir for M. tuberculosis are Human beings; however, the bacteria can also infect other species.[4]

References

  1. “http://phil.cdc.gov/phil/details.asp”. External link in |title= (help)
  2. “http://phil.cdc.gov/phil/details.asp”. External link in |title= (help)
  3. “Mycobacterium tuberculosis”.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Lawn SD, Zumla AI (2011). “Tuberculosis”. Lancet. 378 (9785): 57–72. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62173-3. PMID 21420161.
  5. Smith NH, Hewinson RG, Kremer K, Brosch R, Gordon SV (2009). “Myths and misconceptions: the origin and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis”. Nat Rev Microbiol. 7 (7): 537–44. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2165. PMID 19483712.
  6. Gagneux S, Small PM (2007). “Global phylogeography of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and implications for tuberculosis product development”. Lancet Infect Dis. 7 (5): 328–37. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1. PMID 17448936.
Differentiating Tuberculosis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mashal Awais, M.D.[2]; Alejandro Lemor, M.D. [3]

Overview

Pulmonary tuberculosis should be distinguished from other diseases that cause cough, hemoptysis, fever, night sweat, and weight loss such as: bacterial pneumonia, atypical pneumonia, brucellosis, bronchogenic carcinoma, sarcoidosis, and Hodgkin lymphoma.

Differential Diagnosis

Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Disease Findings
Bacterial pneumonia Sudden onset of symptoms, such as high fever, cough, purulent sputum, chest pain, leukocytosis, chest X-ray shows consolidation.
Bronchogenic carcinoma may be asymptomatic, usually at older ages (> 50 years old), cough, hemoptysis, weight loss
Brucellosis Fever, anorexia, night sweats, malaise,back pain , headache, and depression. History of exposure to infected animal
Hodgkin lymphoma Fever, night sweats, pruritus, painless adenopathy, mediastinal mass
Mycoplasmal pneumonia Gradual onset of dry cough, headache, malaise, sore throat. Diffuse bilateral infiltrates on chest X-ray.
Sarcoidosis Non-caseating granulomas in lungs and other organs, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, mostly in African American females.
Adapted from Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases 2010 [1]

Extra-Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Extra-Pulmonary Location Differential Diagnosis
Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Lymphoma, squamous cell carcinoma, papillary thyroid cancer, pyogenic infection
Skeletal Tuberculosis Multiple myeloma, bone metastasis, spinal cord abscess, osteoporosis
Tuberculous Arthrits Bacterial septic arthritis, pseudogout
Central Nervous System Tuberculosis Bacterial meningitis, viral meningitis, encephalitis
Tuberculosis Peritonitis Bacterial peritonitis, chronic peritoneal dialysis
Adapted from Asian Spine J. Feb 2014; 8(1): 97–111[2]; Handbook of Clinical Neurology[3]; Circulation Dec 2005 vol.112 no.23 3608-3616[4]; Am J Trop Med Hyg 2013 vol. 88 no. 1 54-64[5] Clin Infect Dis.(2011)53(6):555-562.[6]


Causes of

lung cavities

Differentiating Features Differentiating radiological findings Diagnosis

confirmation

  • CXR and CT demonstrates cavities in the upper lobe of the lung
  • Sputum smear-positive for acid-fast bacilli and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) is used on sputum or any sterile fluid for rapid diagnosis and is positive for mycobacteria.
  • Any age group
  • Acute, fulminant life threating complication of prior infection
  • >100.4F fever, with hemodynamic instability
  • Worsening pneumonia-like symptoms
  • CBC is positive for the causative organism
  • Children and elderly are at risk
  • Empyema appears lenticular in shape and has a thin wall with smooth luminal margins
  • Pulmonary nodules with cavities and infiltrates are a frequent manifestation of CXR
  • Elderly females of 40-50 age group
  • Manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Presents with other systemic symptoms including symmetric arthritis of the small joints of the hands and feet and morning stiffness are common manifestations.
  • Pulmonary nodules with cavitation are present in the upper lobe (Caplan syndrome) on Xray.
  • On CXR bilateral adenopathy and coarse reticular opacities are seen.
  • CT of the chest demonstrates extensive hilar and mediastinal adenopathy
  • Additional findings on CT include fibrosis (honeycomb, linear, or associated with bronchial distortion), pleural thickening, and ground-glass opacities.[13]
  • Common appearance on CT is patchy consolidation,often accompanied by ground-glass opacities and nodules.[17]
  • Exclusively occurs in smokers, with a peak age of onset 20-40 years.
  • Clinical presentation is variable, but symptoms generally include months of dry cough, fever, night sweats and weight loss.
  • Skin is involved in 80% of the cases, scaly erythematous rash is typical.
  • Thin-walled cystic cavities are the usual radiographic manifestation, observed in over 50% of patients by either CXR or CT scans.[19]
  • Biopsy of the lung
Differentiating brain tuberculoma from other brain cystic lesions
Disease Prominent clinical features Lab findings Radiological findings
Neurocysticercosis
Brain abscess
  • Lumbar puncture is contraindicated but when done, it was variable between patients.
  • Culture from the CT-guided aspirated lesion helps in identifying the causative agent.
Brain tumors
  • CT may be used in localizing the tumor and getting a rough estimate on the dimensions.
  • MRI: Gadolinium-enhanced MRI is the preferred imaging modality for assessing the extension of the tumor and its exact location.[22]
Brain tuberculoma
  • Presentations are usually due to the pressure effect, not the T.B. bacilli.
  • Presenting symptoms and signs in order of occurrence:[23]
  1. Episodes of focal seizures
  2. Signs of increased intracranial pressure
  3. Focal neurologic deficits.
  • CT: Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a ring enhancing lesion surrounded by an area of hypodensity (cerebritis) and the resulting mass effect.
  • MRI: Better than CT scan in assessing the site and size of the tuberculoma. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI reveals a ring-enhancing lesion between 1-5 cm in size (In NCC, the wall is thicker, calcifications are eccentric and the diameter is less than 2 cm)
Neurosarcoidosis
  • 70% of the patients present with the neurological symptoms rather than the presentation of systemic disease. Common presentations include:[24]
  1. Cranial nerve neuropathies: Facial palsy is the most common presentation.
  2. Meningeal involvement: diffuse meningeal inflammation can result in diffuse basilar polyneuropathy in 40% of the patients. with neurosarcoidosis.
  3. Inflammatory spinal cord disease: Inflammatory span is often more than 3 spinal cord segments that help to distinguish it from Multiple Sclerosis.
  4. Peripheral neuropathy: Asymmetric polyneuropathy or mononeuritis multiplex. It may also manifest as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) like presentation.
  5. HPO axis involvement: may present as diabetes insipidus. More than 50% of the cases do not have any radiological signs.
MRI brain showing brain abscess – Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, https://radiopaedia.org/ From the case https://radiopaedia.org/cases/4933
MRI brain showing Glioblastoma multiforme – Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, <a href=”https://radiopaedia.org/“>Radiopaedia.org</a>. From the case <a href=”https://radiopaedia.org/cases/28272“>rID: 28272</a>
MRI brain showing tuberculoma – Case courtesy of Dr. G Balachandran, https://radiopaedia.org/ From the case https://radiopaedia.org/cases/5489
MRI brain showing Neurosarcoidosis – Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, https://radiopaedia.org/ From the case https://radiopaedia.org/cases/4364S

Pulmonary tuberculosis must be distinguished from other cavitary lung lesions.

Differential Diagnosis

Pulmonary tuberculosis must be distinguished from other cavitary lung lesions.

Causes of

lung cavities

Differentiating Features Differentiating radiological findings Diagnosis

confirmation

  • CXR and CT show cavities in the upper lobe of the lung
  • Sputum smear-positive for acid-fast bacilli and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are used on sputum or any sterile fluid for rapid diagnosis and is positive for mycobacteria.
  • Any age group
  • Acute, fulminant life threating complication of previous infection
  • >100.4 °F fever, with hemodynamic instability
  • Worsening pneumonia-like symptoms
  • CBC is positive for the causative organism
  • Children and elderly are at high risk
  • Empyema appears lenticular in shape and has a thin wall with smooth luminal margins
  • Females of 40-50 age group
  • Manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Presents with other systemic symptoms including symmetric arthritis of the small joints of the hands and feet with morning stiffness are frequent manifestations
  • On CXR bilateral adenopathy and coarse reticular opacities are seen
  • CT of the chest demonstrates extensive hilar and mediastinal adenopathy
  • Additional findings on CT include fibrosis (honeycomb, linear, or associated with bronchial distortion), pleural thickening, and ground-glass opacities.[13]
  • Exclusively occurs in smokers, with a peak age of onset 20-40 years
  • Clinical presentation is variable, but symptoms usually include months of dry cough, fever, night sweats, and weight loss
  • Skin is involved in 80% of the cases, scaly erythematous rash is typical

References

  1. Mandell, Gerald (2010). Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier. ISBN 0443068399.
  2. Moon, Myung-Sang (2014). “Tuberculosis of Spine: Current Views in Diagnosis and Management”. Asian Spine Journal. 8 (1): 97. doi:10.4184/asj.2014.8.1.97. ISSN 1976-1902.
  3. Garcia-Monco, Juan Carlos (2014). “Tuberculosis”. 121: 1485–1499. doi:10.1016/B978-0-7020-4088-7.00100-0. ISSN 0072-9752.
  4. Mayosi, B. M. (2005). “Tuberculous Pericarditis”. Circulation. 112 (23): 3608–3616. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.543066. ISSN 0009-7322.
  5. Daher, E. D. F.; da Silva Junior, G. B.; Barros, E. J. G. (2013). “Renal Tuberculosis in the Modern Era”. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 88 (1): 54–64. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2013.12-0413. ISSN 0002-9637.
  6. Fontanilla, J.-M.; Barnes, A.; von Reyn, C. F. (2011). “Current Diagnosis and Management of Peripheral Tuberculous Lymphadenitis”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 53 (6): 555–562. doi:10.1093/cid/cir454. ISSN 1058-4838.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Chaudhuri MR (1973). “Primary pulmonary cavitating carcinomas”. Thorax. 28 (3): 354–66. PMC 470041. PMID 4353362.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Mouroux J, Padovani B, Elkaïm D, Richelme H (1996). “Should cavitated bronchopulmonary cancers be considered a separate entity?”. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 61 (2): 530–2. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(95)00973-6. PMID 8572761.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Onn A, Choe DH, Herbst RS, Correa AM, Munden RF, Truong MT, Vaporciyan AA, Isobe T, Gilcrease MZ, Marom EM (2005). “Tumor cavitation in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: epidermal growth factor receptor expression and prediction of poor outcome”. Radiology. 237 (1): 342–7. doi:10.1148/radiol.2371041650. PMID 16183941.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Langford CA, Hoffman GS (1999). “Rare diseases.3: Wegener’s granulomatosis”. Thorax. 54 (7): 629–37. PMC 1745525. PMID 10377211.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Lee KS, Kim TS, Fujimoto K, Moriya H, Watanabe H, Tateishi U, Ashizawa K, Johkoh T, Kim EA, Kwon OJ (2003). “Thoracic manifestation of Wegener’s granulomatosis: CT findings in 30 patients”. Eur Radiol. 13 (1): 43–51. doi:10.1007/s00330-002-1422-2. PMID 12541109.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Baughman RP, Teirstein AS, Judson MA, Rossman MD, Yeager H, Bresnitz EA, DePalo L, Hunninghake G, Iannuzzi MC, Johns CJ, McLennan G, Moller DR, Newman LS, Rabin DL, Rose C, Rybicki B, Weinberger SE, Terrin ML, Knatterud GL, Cherniak R (2001). “Clinical characteristics of patients in a case control study of sarcoidosis”. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 164 (10 Pt 1): 1885–9. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.164.10.2104046. PMID 11734441.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Brauner MW, Grenier P, Mompoint D, Lenoir S, de Crémoux H (1989). “Pulmonary sarcoidosis: evaluation with high-resolution CT”. Radiology. 172 (2): 467–71. doi:10.1148/radiology.172.2.2748828. PMID 2748828.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Murphy J, Schnyder P, Herold C, Flower C (1998). “Bronchiolitis obliterans organising pneumonia simulating bronchial carcinoma”. Eur Radiol. 8 (7): 1165–9. doi:10.1007/s003300050527. PMID 9724431.
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Al-Ghanem S, Al-Jahdali H, Bamefleh H, Khan AN (2008). “Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia: pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging and therapy review”. Ann Thorac Med. 3 (2): 67–75. doi:10.4103/1817-1737.39641. PMC 2700454. PMID 19561910.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Cordier JF, Loire R, Brune J (1989). “Idiopathic bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. Definition of characteristic clinical profiles in a series of 16 patients”. Chest. 96 (5): 999–1004. PMID 2805873.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Lee KS, Kullnig P, Hartman TE, Müller NL (1994). “Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia: CT findings in 43 patients”. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 162 (3): 543–6. doi:10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109493. PMID 8109493.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Suri HS, Yi ES, Nowakowski GS, Vassallo R (2012). “Pulmonary langerhans cell histiocytosis”. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 7: 16. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-7-16. PMC 3342091. PMID 22429393.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Moore AD, Godwin JD, Müller NL, Naidich DP, Hammar SP, Buschman DL, Takasugi JE, de Carvalho CR (1989). “Pulmonary histiocytosis X: comparison of radiographic and CT findings”. Radiology. 172 (1): 249–54. doi:10.1148/radiology.172.1.2787035. PMID 2787035.
  20. Brouwer MC, Tunkel AR, McKhann GM, van de Beek D (2014). “Brain abscess”. N. Engl. J. Med. 371 (5): 447–56. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1301635. PMID 25075836.
  21. “Brain Abscess — NEJM”.
  22. 22.0 22.1 “Primary Brain Tumors in Adults – American Family Physician”.
  23. “The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians – Tuberculoma of the brain – A diagnostic dilemma: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy a new ray of hope : Download PDF”.
  24. 24.0 24.1 “Neurosarcoidosis”.
Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mashal Awais, M.D.[3]; João André Alves Silva, M.D. [4], Dima Nimri, M.D. [5], Tarek Nafee, M.D. [6]

Overview

In 2019, about 8,920 TB cases were documented in the US with an incidence of 2.7 cases/100,000 persons. This represented a decrease by 1.1% from 2018. In 2015, about 10.4 million people developed symptomatic TB and 1.8 million died from the disease. In 2014, approximately 9,421 cases were documented in the United States, with an incidence of 3.0 cases/100 000 persons. Since 1990, there has been a decrease in the mortality rate . TB is more prevalent in older men. Racial and ethnic minorities have a higher prevalence of TB than non-Hispanic whites. Coinfection with HIV is an important leading cause of death in TB. In 2015, 60% of the worldwide TB cases were in 6 countries: South Africa, Indonesia, China, Pakistan, India, and Nigeria. The WHO reported 24 other high-burden TB countries including Bangladesh, Korea, Columbia, Cambodia, Congo, Brazil, Ethiopia, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand, Liberia, Vietnam, Kenya, Central Africa, Russia, Angola, Zimbabwe, Namibia, Mozambique, Tanzania, Sierra Leone, Zambia, Papua New Guinea, and Lesotho.[1]

Epidemiology

  • Worldwide, in 2018, there were approximately 10 million individuals with incident TB and about 1.5 million TB-related deaths.
  • Worldwide, in 2015, approximately 10.4 million people had symptomatic TB.[2][3]
  • Worldwide, in 2015, about 1.8 million people died from TB.[2][3]
  • In the United States, in 2014, approximately 9,421 cases were reported with an incidence of 3.0 cases/100 000 persons.[2][3]

Incidence and Mortality

Worldwide Tuberculosis

  • Over 95% of TB deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, and it is among the top three causes of death for women aged 15 to 44.
  • The TB death rate dropped 45% between 1990 and 2012.
  • In 2015, 3 million lives were saved by the global TB response.

Global Regional Incidence & Mortality

The following global regional trends in TB incidence are observed from 2000 to 2015:

Global Incidence and Mortality of Tuberculosis and HIV, By Region (2015)
African Region American Region Eastern Mediterranean Region European Region South-East Asian Region Western-Pacific Region
Incidence
(per 100 000)
275 27 116 36 246 86
Incidence of Multi-Drug Resistant TB
(per 100 000)
11 1.1 6 14 10 5.5
Mortality (excluding HIV-TB coinfection)
(per 100 000)
45 1.9 12 3.5 37 4.8
Mortality (only HIV-TB coinfection)
(per 100 000)
30 0.59 0.46 0.54 3.9 0.31
Total new cases in 2016 1 333 504 230 519 484 733 297 448 2 656 560 1 361 430
Table adapted from WHO Global Report 2016 [1]

TB and HIV

Immunosuppression secondary to HIV is strongly associated with incidence of TB and its subsequent complications. Tuberculosis contributes to a considerable proportion of HIV/AIDS related deaths.

Tuberculosis in Endemic Countries

In 2015, 60% of the worldwide TB cases were reported in six countries:

South Africa

Indonesia

Nigeria

Pakistan

India

China

Tuberculosis in the United States

TB resurge occurred in the mid-1980s since when the number of cases steadily increased with a peak occurred in 1992. Following this peak, the number of reported TB cases has decreased annually. The year of 2014 represented the twenty-second year of decline in the reported TB cases in the United States since that peak. In 2014, approximately a total number of 9,421 cases were reported in the 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC). This was considered a decline of 1.5% from 2013. The number of TB cases per 100,000 in 2013 and 2014 was at a stable rate of 3.0.[1]


Image 1 – Reported TB Cases United States, 1982–2014– Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)[1]
Image 2 – TB Case Rates,* United States, 2014– Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)[1]

Demographics

Age

In 2014, TB cases in most age groups decreased by approximately 70% from the 1993 values. Below is the comparison between the case rates (per 100 000 persons) of these two years, according to different ages:[4]

Age Case rate in 1993 Case rate in 2014
>65 years 17.7 4.8
45 – 64 years 12.4 3.5
25 – 44 years 11.5 3.4
15 – 24 years 5.0 2.2
< 15 years 2.9 0.8
Data provided by the CDC[2][3][4]
Image 4 – TB Case Rates* by Age Group United States, 1993–2014– Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)[5]
Image 5 – Reported TB Cases by Age Group, United States, 2014– Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)[5]

Depending on the age of the patient, tuberculosis may have different clinical manifestations, progression, and prognosis:[6][7][8][9][7][10]

Factor Influence
Infants and Children
  • Younger age (< 5 years) is associated with a higher risk of developing progressive disease.
  • Infants are more prone to the development of tuberculosis following infection with M. tuberculosis.
  • Higher risk of miliary tuberculosis.
  • Common involvement of:
  • Usually have a good prognosis; spontaneous healing occurs even in the absence of therapy.
  • Cavitary tuberculosis has a higher risk of relapse.
Adolescents
  • The lower regions of the lungs are usually affected with the presentation of hilar adenitis
  • Hilar calcification is rare
  • Common in immunocompromised and dark-skinned patients
  • In young adults, the disease tends to affect the apical regions of the lung.
Midadulthood
  • If the infection occurs during mid-adulthood, the disease carries a better prognosis, possibly due to the presence of less necrotic tissue.
Elderly
  • Elderly patients have a weaker immune system. Consequently, latent disease, acquired at younger ages, has a higher risk f progression to active tuberculosis with posterior-apical predominance.
  • A lot of elderly patients are TST negative because they have no prior TB infection; they have lost the immune/hypersensitivity reaction; or because they have completely cleared previous infections. These patients are at risk of reinfection.
  • Tuberculosis in those patients usually presents as middle or lower lobe pneumonitis, rarely with pleural effusion.
  • Similar to tuberculosis in childhood, with less degree of lymphadenopathy
  • Higher death rate

Gender

In 2012, there were 410,000 total deaths in women as a result of TB in the United States, 160,000 of them were HIV-positive. Out of the total TB deaths among HIV-positive people, 50% were women.[2][3] TB rates tend to increase with age, ranging from a low rate of less than 1 per 100,000 in children aged 5 – 14 to a high rate of 6.9 per 100,000 in men aged 65 years and older. With age increasing, the case rate increases faster in men than in women; the rates in men aged 45 years and older were approximately more than double the case rate in women of the same age.[2][3]


Image 6 – TB Case Rates by Age Group and Sex, United States, 2014– Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)[5]

Race

The highest TB rates was reported in Asians, a decline from 29.9 per 100,000 persons in 2003 to 17.8 in 2014.[2][11]

Racial/ethnic groups Case rate in 2003 Case rate in 2014
Non-Hispanic blacks or African-Americans 11.7 5.1
Hispanics 10.3 5.0
American Indians and Alaska Natives 8.2 5.0
Non-Hispanic whites 1.4 0.6
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders 16.2 16.9
Data provided by the CDC[2][3][11]

The disproportionate burden of TB in minorities is due to many factors. In persons who were born in countries where TB is endemic, the disease can be a result of an acquired infection in their country of origin. Unequal distribution of TB risk factors, such as HIV infection, leads to increased TB exposure or to an increased risk of developing TB after infection with with M. tuberculosis.[2]

  • Image 7 shows that TB rates are decreasing by race/ethnicity in the last 12 years.[5]
  • Image 8 shows that above the age of 5, there is an increased risk of TB with age across all racial and ethnic groups. The case rates were higher in minority racial and ethnic groups than in non-Hispanic whites and were highest in Asians, Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders, especially in the adult age groups.[5]
  • Image 9 shows that in 2014, 85% of all reported TB cases occurred in racial and ethnic minorities, whereas 13% of cases occurred in non-Hispanic whites. Persons reporting two or more races accounted for 2% of all cases[5]
Image 7 – TB Case Rates by Race/Ethnicity, United States, 2003–2014– Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)[5]
Image 8 – TB Case Rates by Age Group and Race/Ethnicity, United States, 2014– Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)[5]
Image 9 – Reported TB Cases by Race/Ethnicity, United States, 2014– Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)[5]

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 “WHO 2016 TB Report” (PDF).
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 “Tuberculosis (TB)”.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 “Tuberculosis”.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Center for Disease Control and Prevention http://www.cdc.gov/tb/statistics/reports/2014/pdfs/2014-surveillance-report_table4.pdf
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 “Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)” (PDF).
  6. Stead WW, Lofgren JP, Warren E, Thomas C (1985). “Tuberculosis as an endemic and nosocomial infection among the elderly in nursing homes”. N Engl J Med. 312 (23): 1483–7. doi:10.1056/NEJM198506063122304. PMID 3990748.
  7. 7.0 7.1 DAHL RH (1952). “[The first appearance of a pulmonary cavity after primary infection with relation to time and age]”. Acta Tuberc Scand. 27 (1–2): 140–9. PMID 13007533.
  8. Stead WW (1967). “Pathogenesis of a first episode of chronic pulmonary tuberculosis in man: recrudescence of residuals of the primary infection or exogenous reinfection?”. Am Rev Respir Dis. 95 (5): 729–45. PMID 4960690.
  9. “Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. This is a Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This statement was endorsed by the Council of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. (IDSA), September 1999, and the sections of this statement”. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 161 (4 Pt 2): S221–47. 2000. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.supplement_3.ats600. PMID 10764341.
  10. Stead WW, Kerby GR, Schlueter DP, Jordahl CW (1968). “The clinical spectrum of primary tuberculosis in adults. Confusion with reinfection in the pathogenesis of chronic tuberculosis”. Ann Intern Med. 68 (4): 731–45. PMID 5642961.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Center for Disease Control and Prevention http://www.cdc.gov/tb/statistics/reports/2014/pdfs/2014-surveillance-report_table17.pdf

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mashal Awais, M.D.[2]; João André Alves Silva, M.D. [3]

Overview

The risk factors for developing tuberculosis include: living or traveling to endemic areas for TB, elderly people and infants, immunosuppression, history of frequent or prolonged contact with infected patients, IV drug users, smoking, bad hygiene, and poor nutrition. In addition, the risk factors for multidrug-resistant TB include: non-adherence to treatment regimen, inadequate treatment for that bacterial strain, and contact with patients with multidrug-resistant TB.

Risk Factors

Primary TB, which represents 1-5% cases, occurs after infection. However, most of the cases occur with latent infection which is asymptomatic. The dormant bacilli can cause tuberculosis in 2 to 23% of the latent cases, usually several years following the primary infection.[1] The risk of reactivation is much higher with immunosuppression, such as HIV. In patients with HIV coinfection, the risk of reactivation increases reaching up to 10% per year.

The following are risk factors for active TB:[2][3]

  • Or those taking medications, such as:

The risk of contracting TB increases in cases where there is:[2]

The following factors may increase the rate of TB infection in a population:[2]

Drugs With Increased Risk of Tuberculosis Reactivation

Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Drug resistance is more common in people who:[5]

  • Do not take their TB medicine regularly
  • Do not take all of their TB medicine as told by their doctor or nurse
  • Develop TB disease again, after having taken TB medicine in the past
  • Come from areas of the world where drug-resistant TB is common
  • Have spent time with someone known to have drug-resistant TB disease

References

  1. Parrish N, Dick J, Bishai W (1998). “Mechanisms of latency in Mycobacterium tuberculosis”. Trends Microbiol. 6 (3): 107–12. PMID 9582936.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 “Tuberculosis Fact Sheet”.
  3. Griffith D, Kerr C (1996). “Tuberculosis: disease of the past, disease of the present”. J Perianesth Nurs. 11 (4): 240–5. PMID 8964016.
  4. Mutlu G, Mutlu E, Bellmeyer A, Rubinstein I (2006). “Pulmonary adverse events of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody therapy”. Am J Med. 119 (8): 639–46. PMID 16887405.
  5. “Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis”.

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2]; Mashal Awais, M.D.[3]; Alejandro Lemor, M.D. [4]; Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[5]

Tuberculosis screening

Tuberculosis (TB) screening is the risk-based identification of asymptomatic persons who may have Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and who would benefit from further evaluation and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Screening is performed using either the Mantoux tuberculin skin test (TST) or an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). Neither TST nor IGRA distinguishes LTBI from active TB disease, and neither test should be used to monitor response to treatment.[1][2]

Screening should be targeted to persons at increased risk for TB infection or increased risk of progression from LTBI to active disease. Universal testing of low-risk populations is not recommended because the positive predictive value is poor when pretest probability is low, and false-positive results may lead to unnecessary radiography, follow-up testing, and treatment.[3][1]

Who should be screened

The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening for LTBI in asymptomatic adults aged 18 years or older who are at increased risk for TB infection.[3] The CDC and specialty guidelines also recommend testing selected children, contacts, healthcare personnel, and immunocompromised persons based on exposure risk and risk of progression.[1][4]

Population Screening recommendation Notes
Persons born in, or with prolonged travel to, countries with high TB incidence Screen for LTBI Includes many countries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and the Pacific Islands.[3][4]
Close contacts of persons with infectious TB disease Screen and evaluate for active disease Contact investigation may require repeat testing 8-10 weeks after last exposure if the initial test is negative.[1]
Current or former residents of congregate settings Screen when exposure risk is increased Includes homeless shelters, correctional facilities, long-term care facilities, and other high-risk congregate settings.[3]
Healthcare personnel Baseline screening at hire or preplacement Routine serial testing is not recommended unless exposure or ongoing transmission occurs.[5]
Persons with HIV infection Screen at diagnosis regardless of epidemiologic risk Repeat testing is recommended if initial testing is negative during advanced immunosuppression and immune reconstitution later occurs.[6]
Persons receiving or preparing for major immunosuppression Screen before therapy when feasible Includes tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, organ transplantation, and prolonged systemic glucocorticoids equivalent to prednisone ≥15 mg/day for ≥1 month.[1]
Persons with conditions increasing progression risk Screen when epidemiologic risk or clinical context supports testing Includes silicosis, hematologic malignancy, dialysis, and other immunosuppressive conditions.[2]
Low-risk asymptomatic persons Do not routinely screen If testing is mandated and the first test is positive, confirmatory testing is recommended before labeling the person infected.[1]

Conditions such as diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, low body weight, smoking, gastrectomy, and head or neck cancer increase risk of progression once infection is present, but they are not usually independent indications for LTBI testing without epidemiologic exposure risk.[2]

Screening algorithm

Template:Family tree/summary=Risk-based tuberculosis screening algorithm
 
 
 
Asymptomatic person considered for TB screening
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assess epidemiologic risk, exposure history, immune status, and risk of progression
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Increased risk for TB infection or progression?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
 
 
 
No
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Perform IGRA or TST based on age, BCG status, return likelihood, and local availability
 
 
 
Do not routinely test unless mandated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
If positive: symptom screen and chest radiograph to exclude active TB disease
 
 
 
If tested despite low risk and positive: obtain confirmatory second test
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
If active disease excluded: diagnose LTBI and offer treatment
 
 
 
Consider infected only if both tests are positive

Screening tests

Two test categories are used for LTBI screening: the TST and IGRAs. Both detect immune sensitization to M. tuberculosis antigens. Neither test can determine whether infection is latent or active.[1][2]

Tuberculin skin test

The Mantoux tuberculin skin test is performed by intradermal injection of 0.1 mL of purified protein derivative (PPD; 5 tuberculin units) into the volar surface of the forearm. A properly placed test produces a 6-10 mm wheal. The result is read 48-72 hours later by measuring the transverse diameter of induration, not erythema, in millimeters.[1][7]

The only absolute contraindication to TST is a prior severe reaction, such as necrosis, blistering, ulceration, or anaphylaxis, after a previous TST. TST is not contraindicated in pregnancy, infants, children, persons with HIV infection, or persons who received BCG vaccine.[7]

TST interpretation

TST interpretation depends on both the measured induration and the patient’s risk of TB infection or progression to active disease.[1][7]

Induration threshold Considered positive in
≥5 mm Persons with HIV infection; recent contacts of infectious TB cases; persons with fibrotic changes on chest radiograph consistent with prior TB; organ transplant recipients; and other significantly immunosuppressed persons, including those receiving TNF-alpha antagonists or prednisone ≥15 mg/day for ≥1 month.
≥10 mm Persons born in or recently arriving from high-incidence countries; injection drug users; residents or employees of high-risk congregate settings; mycobacteriology laboratory personnel; persons with selected medical conditions that increase risk of progression; children younger than 4 years; and children or adolescents exposed to adults in high-risk categories.
≥15 mm Persons with no known risk factors for TB.

Interferon-gamma release assays

Interferon-gamma release assays measure interferon-gamma release by T cells after stimulation with M. tuberculosis-specific antigens, including ESAT-6 and CFP-10. These antigens are absent from BCG strains and most nontuberculous mycobacteria, giving IGRAs higher specificity than TST in BCG-vaccinated persons.[1][2]

Two FDA-approved IGRAs are used in the United States:

Test Method Positive threshold Practical notes
QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Whole-blood enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measuring interferon-gamma response to TB-specific antigens ≥0.35 IU/mL after subtracting nil control Current-generation QuantiFERON assay; replaces older QFT-GIT in most settings.[8]
T-SPOT.TB Enzyme-linked immunospot assay using separated peripheral blood mononuclear cells ≥8 spot-forming cells May be useful in selected immunocompromised patients; requires specialized processing.

The 2023 USPSTF evidence review reported sensitivity of 89% for QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (95% CI, 84%-94%) and 90% for T-SPOT.TB (95% CI, 87%-92%). Reported specificity was 98% for QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (95% CI, 95%-99%) based on one study, and approximately 95%-97% for T-SPOT.TB based on two studies.[9] Indeterminate or invalid IGRA results occur in a minority of tests and should prompt repeat testing or use of an alternate test, depending on clinical context.[1]

Choosing between TST and IGRA

The choice between TST and IGRA depends on age, BCG vaccination history, likelihood of return for TST reading, immune status, test availability, and local practice.[1]

Clinical context Preferred test Rationale
Age ≥5 years with history of BCG vaccination IGRA preferred Higher specificity because IGRA antigens are absent from BCG.[1]
Age ≥5 years and unlikely to return for TST reading IGRA preferred Requires only one encounter.
Other persons ≥5 years who meet criteria for LTBI testing IGRA generally preferred, TST acceptable TST remains acceptable when IGRA is unavailable, too costly, or impractical.[1]
Healthy children younger than 5 years TST suggested by ATS/IDSA/CDC; AAP supports IGRA use from age ≥2 years, especially if BCG-vaccinated Pediatric age cutoffs differ between guidelines.[1][10]
High risk of progression, including HIV or major immunosuppression Either TST or IGRA; consider dual testing when sensitivity is critical Evidence is insufficient to clearly prefer one test over the other in all high-risk populations.[1]
Low-risk person tested despite guidelines and initial test positive Confirm with a second test, either TST or IGRA Infection is confirmed only if both tests are positive.[1]

Two-step TST

Two-step TST is used to establish a baseline in persons who will undergo serial TST testing and who have not had a TST within the previous 1-2 years. Remote TB infection, prior BCG vaccination, or nontuberculous mycobacterial exposure may produce waning immune reactivity, so the first TST may boost the immune response and make a later TST appear falsely converted.[1][11]

If the first TST is negative, a second TST is placed 1-3 weeks later. If the second test is negative, the person is considered uninfected at baseline. If the second test is positive, this is interpreted as boosting rather than new infection.[11]

Two-step testing is recommended when TST is used for baseline testing in healthcare personnel, selected residents of congregate facilities, and travelers who will undergo serial TST testing. Two-step testing is unnecessary when using an IGRA.[5][11]

False-positive and false-negative results

Test False-positive causes False-negative causes
TST Prior BCG vaccination, especially vaccination after infancy or repeated BCG vaccination; infection with nontuberculous mycobacteria; incorrect administration; incorrect interpretation; wrong antigen product. The effect of BCG vaccination given in infancy is usually minimal after 10 years.[1][2] Recent TB infection within 8-10 weeks; advanced immunosuppression; HIV with low CD4 count; very young age; recent live-virus vaccination such as measles or varicella; overwhelming TB disease; incorrect administration or reading.
IGRA Low pretest probability; rare cross-reactivity with nontuberculous mycobacteria containing ESAT-6 or CFP-10, such as M. kansasii, M. szulgai, or M. marinum. Advanced immunosuppression; young age; improper specimen handling; delayed incubation; lymphopenia; indeterminate or invalid assay response.

Borderline or low-positive IGRA results may have limited reproducibility, especially in low-risk populations. When testing is performed despite low pretest probability, confirmatory testing is recommended after an initial positive result.[1]

Screening in special populations

Persons with HIV infection

All persons with HIV infection should be evaluated for LTBI at the time of HIV diagnosis, regardless of epidemiologic risk.[6] Either TST or IGRA may be used; IGRA is preferred in BCG-vaccinated persons. TST is positive at ≥5 mm in persons with HIV.[6]

Progressive immunodeficiency reduces the sensitivity of both TST and IGRA. Persons with HIV who initially test negative during advanced immunosuppression should be retested after immune reconstitution on antiretroviral therapy if they remain at risk.[6] Annual retesting is recommended for persons with ongoing exposure risk.[6]

In a U.S. prospective study of persons with HIV, T-SPOT.TB had the highest specificity and positive predictive value, whereas QFT-GIT had higher sensitivity than TST. These data support guideline statements that test performance varies with immune status and that no single test is clearly preferred for all persons with HIV.[6]

Children and adolescents

Children should be tested only when they have risk factors for TB infection or progression. Testing should not be performed routinely in low-risk children.[10]

The ATS/IDSA/CDC guideline suggests TST rather than IGRA in healthy children younger than 5 years, whereas the American Academy of Pediatrics supports IGRAs in children aged 2 years or older, especially if BCG-vaccinated.[1][10] This creates a practical pediatric cutoff discrepancy: CDC TST interpretation tables use children younger than 4 years in the ≥10 mm threshold group, while AAP guidance often uses younger than 5 years when discussing high-risk pediatric testing considerations.[7][10] In exposed young children, a negative initial test does not exclude recent infection; repeat testing 8-10 weeks after last exposure is required.[10]

Pregnancy

TST is not contraindicated during pregnancy. Either TST or IGRA may be used when risk factors for TB infection or progression are present.[7] Screening should not be delayed when the pregnant patient has recent exposure, HIV infection, or other major risk factors for progression.

Healthcare personnel

The 2019 National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC recommendations changed the approach to healthcare personnel screening. Baseline screening is still recommended, but routine serial testing is no longer recommended in the absence of known exposure or ongoing transmission.[5]

Category 2005 approach 2019 NTCA/CDC approach
Baseline preplacement screening TB screening, symptom evaluation, and TST or IGRA for personnel without documented prior TB disease or LTBI. Same, with addition of individual TB risk assessment.[5]
Postexposure testing Symptom evaluation for all exposed personnel; test at exposure recognition and repeat 8-10 weeks after last exposure if initially negative. Unchanged.
Routine serial testing Based on facility risk classification; used in medium-risk settings and settings with ongoing transmission. Not routinely recommended unless exposure or ongoing transmission occurs; may be considered for selected high-risk groups.
Annual requirements Serial testing in some settings. Annual TB education for all healthcare personnel.
Positive test result Referral to determine whether LTBI treatment is indicated. Treatment is encouraged for all healthcare personnel with untreated LTBI unless medically contraindicated.

If baseline testing is positive in a healthcare worker who is asymptomatic and low risk, a second confirmatory test should be performed before chest radiography and LTBI diagnosis.[5] Healthcare personnel with untreated LTBI should receive annual symptom screening.[5]

HIV screening in TB clinics

HIV testing is recommended for all patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease and for persons diagnosed with LTBI or identified as TB contacts. Testing should be offered using an opt-out approach, meaning that testing is performed after the patient is informed unless the patient declines.[12]

Separate written consent and prevention counseling are not required for HIV screening in healthcare settings unless required by local law.[12]

Chest radiography and computer-aided detection in screening programs

In low-incidence settings such as the United States, chest radiography is used primarily after a positive TST or IGRA to exclude active pulmonary TB before diagnosing LTBI.[1] A normal chest radiograph and absence of symptoms support LTBI rather than active pulmonary TB; abnormal radiography or TB symptoms require sputum testing for acid-fast bacilli smear, mycobacterial culture, and nucleic acid amplification testing.[1]

In high-burden settings, chest radiography is also used for systematic screening for active pulmonary TB. Computer-aided detection (CAD) software can interpret digital chest radiographs for TB-suggestive abnormalities and has been conditionally recommended by WHO as an alternative to human readers in screening programs, although all positive screens require bacteriologic confirmation.[13]

Recent prospective studies suggest that CAD-based chest radiography may improve screening throughput in high-burden settings, but thresholds, local prevalence, confirmatory testing capacity, and cost-effectiveness must be considered before implementation.[14][15]

Post-screening evaluation

A positive TST or IGRA result requires clinical evaluation to exclude active TB disease before LTBI is diagnosed and treated.[1][2]

Step Action
1 Assess for symptoms of active TB, including cough, fever, night sweats, weight loss, hemoptysis, fatigue, and extrapulmonary symptoms.
2 Obtain chest radiography.
3 If symptoms are present or chest radiograph is abnormal, evaluate for active TB disease with sputum acid-fast bacilli smear, mycobacterial culture, and nucleic acid amplification testing.
4 If asymptomatic and chest radiograph is normal, diagnose LTBI and offer treatment after excluding contraindications.

Common pitfalls

  • Screening low-risk persons, which increases false-positive results.
  • Measuring erythema rather than induration when reading the TST.
  • Using a single TST cutoff for all patients rather than risk-stratified thresholds.
  • Using TST or IGRA to rule out active TB disease.
  • Failing to perform chest radiography after a positive TST or IGRA.
  • Treating a positive test as LTBI before excluding active TB disease.
  • Ordering routine annual TB testing for all healthcare personnel despite the 2019 NTCA/CDC update.
  • Using older QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube language when QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus is the current-generation assay.
  • Using TST or IGRA to monitor response to anti-tuberculosis therapy.

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 Lewinsohn DM, Leonard MK, LoBue PA; et al. (2017). “Official American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children”. Clin Infect Dis. 64 (2): e1–e33. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw694. PMID 28100511.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Shah M, Dorman SE (2021). “Latent Tuberculosis Infection”. N Engl J Med. 385 (24): 2271–2280. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp2108501. PMID 34818478 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 US Preventive Services Task Force, Mangione CM, Barry MJ; et al. (2023). “Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement”. JAMA. 329 (17): 1487–1494. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.4899. PMID 37129644 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. 4.0 4.1 “Latent TB Infection Testing and Treatment: Summary of U.S. Recommendations”. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Retrieved May 27 2026. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Sosa LE, Njie GJ, Lobato MN; et al. (2019). “Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of U.S. Health Care Personnel: Recommendations From the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019”. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 68 (19): 439–443. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6819a3. PMID 31099768.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 “Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents With HIV: Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Disease”. National Institutes of Health. 2025. Retrieved May 27 2026. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 “Tuberculin Skin Testing”. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2024. Retrieved May 27 2026. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  8. Zhang Y, Zhou G, Shi W; et al. (2023). “Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus With QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB and TST: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. BMC Infect Dis. 23 (1): 40. doi:10.1186/s12879-023-08008-2. PMID 36650462 Check |pmid= value (help).
  9. Jonas DE, Riley SR, Lee LC; et al. (2023). “Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force”. JAMA. 329 (17): 1495–1509. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.3954. PMID 37129645 Check |pmid= value (help).
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 Nolt D, Starke JR (2021). “Tuberculosis Infection in Children and Adolescents: Testing and Treatment”. Pediatrics. 148 (6): e2021054663. doi:10.1542/peds.2021-054663. PMID 34801834 Check |pmid= value (help).
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 “Tuberculosis”. CDC Yellow Book. 2024. Retrieved May 27 2026. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  12. 12.0 12.1 “Recommendations for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening in Tuberculosis Clinics”. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2024. Retrieved May 27 2026. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  13. “WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 2: Screening. Systematic screening for tuberculosis disease”. World Health Organization. 2021. Retrieved May 27 2026. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  14. Macpherson L, Kik SV, Quartagno M; et al. (2025). “Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest X-Ray Computer-Aided Detection Software for Detection of Prevalent and Incident Tuberculosis in Household Contacts”. Clin Infect Dis. 80 (3): 626–636. doi:10.1093/cid/ciae528. PMID 39432010 Check |pmid= value (help).
  15. Crowder R, Thangakunam B, Andama A; et al. (2026). “Diagnostic Accuracy of Tuberculosis Screening Tests in a Prospective Multinational Cohort: Chest Radiography With Computer-Aided Detection, Xpert Tuberculosis Host Response, and C-Reactive Protein”. Clin Infect Dis. 82 (2): e239–e247. doi:10.1093/cid/ciae549. PMID 39611909 Check |pmid= value (help).


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mashal Awais, M.D.[2];Sophia Saad, Associate Editor – WikiDoc [3] João André Alves Silva, M.D. [4] Template:Tuberculosis Natural History, complications, and prognosis

Tuberculosis natural history, complications, and prognosis

Natural history

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI)

In the absence of treatment, approximately 5% to 15% of immunocompetent persons with LTBI progress to active TB disease over a lifetime, with estimates varying by source (ATS/IDSA/CDC diagnostic guideline estimates 4%–6%; USPSTF cites 5%–10%; NEJM review cites 5%–15%).[1][2][3]

People with untreated HIV infection have an estimated annual risk of progression to TB disease of 3% to 16%.[4]

Untreated active tuberculosis

Untreated active TB can progress over weeks to months with ongoing tissue destruction and increased transmission risk (for pulmonary disease). Pre-chemotherapy era systematic reviews provide the following estimates for HIV-negative individuals: untreated smear-positive pulmonary TB has a 10-year case fatality of approximately 70% (weighted mean), while culture-positive, smear-negative TB has an estimated 10-year case fatality of approximately 20%.[5]

The average duration of untreated pulmonary TB from onset to cure or death is approximately 3 years, though Bayesian re-analysis estimates shorter duration for smear-positive disease (~1.6 years) and longer for smear-negative disease (~5.4 years). Natural recovery occurs in a substantial minority of untreated smear-positive cases.[5][6]

In children (pre-treatment era), case fatality was 44% in those aged 0–4 years and 15% in those aged 5–14 years.[7]

Complications

Pulmonary complications

Common pulmonary complications include:

Extrapulmonary and disseminated complications

Miliary tuberculosis and other disseminated forms (hematogenous spread).[9]

Site-specific complications may include neurologic disability from tuberculous meningitis, pericardial complications (effusion/constriction), skeletal deformity from spinal TB, and infertility/obstructive uropathy from genitourinary TB.

Post-tuberculosis sequelae (after microbiologic cure)

Risk factors associated with post-TB sequelae have been summarized in systematic review and meta-analysis.[10]

Quantitative estimates of post-TB lung disease (PTLD) burden include: approximately 50% of pulmonary TB survivors have abnormal spirometry at or after treatment completion, with severe impairment in 10%–15%; bronchiectasis is observed in 35%–86% on imaging.[11]

Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) prevalence in TB survivors ranges from 7% to 23%, with residual cavitation being the strongest risk factor (annual incidence of new CPA ~6.5% in those with cavitation vs 0.2% without).[12][13]

TB survivors have an estimated standardized mortality ratio of approximately 2.9 compared with the general population, with cardiovascular disease, cancer, and respiratory diseases among the leading causes of post-treatment death. Among post-treatment deaths, approximately 20% are attributable to cardiovascular disease. Post-TB excess mortality is highest in the first year after diagnosis (mortality rate ratio ~11) and declines progressively, reaching ~1.5 by year 10, but remains elevated for at least 14 years.[14]

People with prior TB have an approximately 1.6-fold increased risk of all cancers and a 3.2-fold increased risk of lung cancer compared with controls.[15]

Long-term sequelae after pulmonary TB (including cardiopulmonary impairment and chronic respiratory symptoms) are reviewed in narrative and European Respiratory Society publications.[16][17]

Prognosis

Prognosis by drug susceptibility pattern

Mortality differs substantially by drug susceptibility pattern in treated TB cohorts from high-burden countries.[18]

Drug susceptibility pattern Reported mortality (treated cohort) Clinical notes
Pan-susceptible TB 6% Observational multicentre cohort; mortality varies by setting and comorbidity burden.
Isoniazid-monoresistant TB 30% (7/23 patients) Small subgroup treated with first-line regimens; a larger meta-analysis (25 studies) found pooled mortality of 6% overall. Current ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA guidelines recommend fluoroquinolone-containing regimens, which substantially improve outcomes.
Pre-XDR/XDR TB 35% High mortality despite treatment; emphasizes prognostic impact of resistance and the importance of effective regimens guided by DST.

Prognosis in HIV co-infection

TB in people with HIV has higher risk of disseminated and extrapulmonary disease and higher mortality, especially with advanced immunosuppression. The CD4+ T-lymphocyte count is the strongest predictor of TB-related mortality in people with HIV. Mortality with treatment is approximately 2.5% for HIV-negative individuals and approximately 14% for people with HIV.[19][8]

Initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) during TB treatment reduces mortality by approximately 24% overall and reduces HIV disease progression by 34%.[20]

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) is a clinically important complication after ART initiation in TB-HIV co-infection; paradoxical TB-IRIS occurs in approximately 18% of patients starting ART.[19]

Prognosis of TB meningitis

TB meningitis carries the highest mortality of any TB form, with case fatality rates of approximately 20–30% in HIV-negative patients and up to 50% in HIV-positive patients, even with treatment. Mortality is strongly associated with MRC stage at presentation: stage I has the best prognosis, while stage III (GCS ≤10) carries the highest mortality. Survivors frequently have permanent neurologic sequelae.[21][22]

References

  1. Lewinsohn DM, Leonard MK, LoBue PA; et al. (2017). “Official American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw694. PMID 27932390.
  2. US Preventive Services Task Force, Mangione CM, Barry MJ; et al. (2023). “Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement”. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.4899. PMID 37129649 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. Shah M, Dorman SE (2021). “Latent Tuberculosis Infection”. The New England Journal of Medicine. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp2108501. PMID 34879449 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. “Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents With HIV”. NIH Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council. 2025.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Tiemersma EW, van der Werf MJ, Borgdorff MW, Williams BG, Nagelkerke NJ (2011). “Natural History of Tuberculosis: Duration and Fatality of Untreated Pulmonary Tuberculosis in HIV Negative Patients: A Systematic Review”. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017601. PMID 21483732.
  6. Ragonnet R, Flegg JA, Brilleman SL; et al. (2021). “Revisiting the Natural History of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Bayesian Estimation of Natural Recovery and Mortality Rates”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa602. PMID 32766718 Check |pmid= value (help).
  7. Jenkins HE, Yuen CM, Rodriguez CA; et al. (2017). “Mortality in Children Diagnosed With Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30474-1. PMID 28100428.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Dheda K, Barry CE, Maartens G (2016). “Tuberculosis”. Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00151-8. PMID 26842682.
  9. Frieden TR, Sterling TR, Munsiff SS, Watt CJ, Dye C (2003). “Tuberculosis”. Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14333-4. PMID 13678977.
  10. Akalu TY, Clements ACA, Liyew AM; et al. (2024). “Risk Factors Associated With Post-Tuberculosis Sequelae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. EClinicalMedicine. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102898. PMID 39402872 Check |pmid= value (help).
  11. Meghji J, Auld SC, Bisson GP; et al. (2025). “Post-Tuberculosis Lung Disease: Towards Prevention, Diagnosis, and Care”. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00429-6. PMID 39971252 Check |pmid= value (help).
  12. Page ID, Byanyima R, Hosmane S; et al. (2019). “Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis Commonly Complicates Treated Pulmonary Tuberculosis With Residual Cavitation”. European Respiratory Journal. doi:10.1183/13993003.01184-2018. PMID 30705126.
  13. Sehgal IS, Muthu V, Salzer HJF, Agarwal R (2026). “Post-Tuberculosis Lung Disease and Pulmonary Aspergillosis Management: Challenges and Considerations”. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy. doi:10.1080/14787210.2026.2631525. PMID 39967172 Check |pmid= value (help).
  14. Romanowski K, Baumann B, Basham CA; et al. (2019). “Long-Term All-Cause Mortality in People Treated for Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30309-3. PMID 31530472.
  15. Luczynski P, Poulin P, Romanowski K, Johnston JC (2022). “Tuberculosis and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278661. PMID 36584036 Check |pmid= value (help).
  16. Wang J, Yuan B, Fang Y; et al. (2025). “Post-Tuberculosis Morbidities and Their Associated Mortality: Moving From Challenges to Solutions”. European Respiratory Review. doi:10.1183/16000617.0148-2025. PMID 40471221 Check |pmid= value (help).
  17. Gupte AN, Boisson-Walsh A, Huaman MA; et al. (2026). “Long-Term Sequelae of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Narrative Review”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1093/cid/ciag123. PMID 40311222 Check |pmid= value (help).
  18. Zürcher K, Ballif M, Fenner L; et al. (2019). “Drug Susceptibility Testing and Mortality in Patients Treated for Tuberculosis in High-Burden Countries: A Multicentre Cohort Study”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30673-X. PMID 30711372.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Meintjes G, Maartens G (2024). “HIV-Associated Tuberculosis”. The New England Journal of Medicine. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2308181. PMID 39018535 Check |pmid= value (help).
  20. Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N; et al. (2016). “Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw376. PMID 27516382.
  21. Thwaites GE, van Toorn R, Schoeman J (2013). “Tuberculous Meningitis: More Questions, Still Too Few Answers”. The Lancet Neurology. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70168-8. PMID 23948180.
  22. Donovan J, Cresswell FV, Tucker EW; et al. (2026). “A Clinical Practice Guideline for Tuberculous Meningitis”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00364-0. PMID 40840485 Check |pmid= value (help).
Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Special Conditions | Drug-resistant | Children |Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Related Chapters
External Links

Template:WH Template:WS

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH