Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Tricuspid stenosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Salih, M.D. Fatimo Biobaku M.B.B.S [2] Rim Halaby, M.D. [3]
Synonyms and keywords:

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2] Mohammed Salih, M.D. Syed Musadiq Ali M.B.B.S.[3]

Overview

Tricuspid stenosis (TS) is a type of valvular heart disease where there is a narrowing of the orifice of the tricuspid valve of the heart. A majority of stenotic tricuspid valves are associated with evidence of tricuspid regurgitation. Tricuspid stenosis is quite uncommon in developed countries due to the low prevalence of rheumatic heart disease, which is the commonest cause of TS. It is the least common valvular stenosis lesion, and generally accompanies mitral and/or aortic valve involvement. It is extremely rare to have isolated acquired tricuspid stenosis. Rheumatic tricuspid valve disease seldom receives much attention and can be easily overlooked on routine clinical and echocardiographic examination, which may lead to postoperative problems after successfully relieving left-sided valvular disease. The clinical findings associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease are also more severe than that of rheumatic tricuspid valve disease, making it rather easy to miss the diagnosis of concomitant tricuspid stenosis (TS). There is a paucity of literature on the prevalence and management of rheumatic tricuspid valve disease. Most of the literature on rheumatic tricuspid stenosis is old, which may be reflective of the low prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in developed countries. However, developing countries and the Indian subcontinent still have a significant prevalence of rheumatic tricuspid valve disease, occurring mostly in young women. Stenotic tricuspid valves are usually anatomically abnormal, and often take years to develop, with few exceptions such as congenital causes, active endocarditis.

Classification

Tricuspid stenosis is staged based on the valve anatomy and hemodynamics, and the hemodynamic consequences.

Stage Definition Valve anatomy Valve hemodynamics Hemodynamic consequences Symptoms
C, D Severe TS Thickened, distorted, calcified leaflets
  • T ½ ≥190 ms 
  • Valve area ≤1.0 cm2
Right atrial / Inferior vena cava enlargement
  • Stage C-No symptoms
  • Stage D-Symptoms variable and dependent on the severity of associated valve disease and degree of obstruction

Pathophysiology

TS is characterized by structural changes in the tricuspid valve. The pathophysiology of tricuspid valve stenosis depends on the underlying etiology. In rheumatic heart disease which is the most common cause of TS, there is diffuse scarring and fibrosis of the valve leaflets, fusion of the commissures, and shortening of the chordae tendineae as a result of inflammation. These abnormalities limit leaflet mobility and reduce the size of the tricuspid orifice, increasing the transtricuspid diastolic gradient, which can eventually result in systemic venous hypertension and congestion.

The pathophysiology of tricuspid stenosis based on the underlying etiology:

Causes

The most common cause of TS is rheumatic heart disease. Other causes of TS include carcinoid syndrome, congenital abnormalities, endocarditis, lupus, and mechanical obstruction by a tumor.

Common Causes

Etiology of tricuspid stenosis in operatively excised valves in patients >15years

Etiology of tricuspid stenosis in 97 operatively excised stenotic tricuspid valves
Rheumatic Carcinoid Congenital
Ebstein’s anomaly Complex heart disease Shortened chordae and/or fused commissure
90 3 1 2 1

Causes by Organ System

Cardiovascular Congenital heart disease, cardiac tumor, saphenous vein bypass graft aneurysm, Ebstein’s anomaly, endomyocardial fibrosis, infective endocarditis, myxoma, thrombus, rheumatic heart disease
Chemical/Poisoning No underlying causes
Dental No underlying causes
Dermatologic No underlying causes
Drug Side Effect Methysergide
Ear Nose Throat No underlying causes
Endocrine Carcinoid syndrome
Environmental No underlying causes
Gastroenterologic No underlying causes
Genetic No underlying causes
Hematologic No underlying causes
Iatrogenic Pacemaker infection, pacemaker leads, device closure of right coronary arteriovenous fistula.
Infectious Disease Infective endocarditis
Musculoskeletal/Orthopedic No underlying causes
Neurologic No underlying causes
Nutritional/Metabolic Fabry disease, Whipple’s disease
Obstetric/Gynecologic No underlying causes
Oncologic Carcinoid syndrome, cardiac tumor, intravenous leiomyomatous tumor, metastatic tumor, myxoma
Ophthalmologic No underlying causes
Overdose/Toxicity No underlying causes
Psychiatric No underlying causes
Pulmonary No underlying causes
Renal/Electrolyte No underlying causes
Rheumatology/Immunology/Allergy Amyloidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus
Sexual No underlying causes
Trauma No underlying causes
Urologic No underlying causes
Miscellaneous Giant blood cyst

Causes by Alphabetical Order

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of tricuspid stenosis includes valvular abnormalities causing a similar clinical presentation, and other causes of systemic venous congestion. The heart murmur of tricuspid stenosis must be differentiated from that of other valvular diseases. However, it should be noted that tricuspid stenosis often co-exists with other valvular pathologies such as tricuspid regurgitation, mitral valve and aortic valve abnormalities. Tricuspid stenosis is characterized by a mid diastolic murmur best heard over the left sternal border. It has a rumbling character, a tricuspid opening snap with the wide splitting of S1. The differential diagnosis of tricuspid stenosis includes:

Tricuspid stenosis should also be differentiated from diseases causing a similar clinical presentation, such as:

Epidemiology and Demographics

TS is the least common valvular disease. TS is rarely an isolated disease, it is mostly associated with mitral and/or aortic valve abnormalities with/without concomitant tricuspid regurgitation.

Prevalence

A prospective study of the echocardiographic profile of tricuspid valve disease in 788 patients with rheumatic heart disease in India was done. 9% of the patients had tricuspid valve disease and half of these patients with tricuspid valve disease had tricuspid stenosis with/without tricuspid regurgitation. The prevalence of TS is lower in developed countries compared to the developing countries due to the low prevalence of rheumatic heart disease.

Gender

Most patients with rheumatic tricuspid stenosis are young women with mitral and/or aortic valve disease.

Risk Factors

One of the most recognized risk factors for TS is rheumatic fever.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural history

The natural course of tricuspid stenosis is not well defined. It is extremely rare for TS to occur in isolation, it is usually associated with existing mitral valve disease with/without concomitant tricuspid regurgitation. The most common cause of TS is rheumatic heart disease and it is usually associated with coexisting mitral valve and/or aortic valve abnormality. TS of rheumatic etiology usually occurs with tricuspid regurgitation. Tricuspid stenosis often takes years to develop, with some exceptions such as congenital causes and active infective endocarditis. Complications of tricuspid stenosis include heart failure, liver failure, and stroke.

Complications of TS

Prognosis

With medical intervention, severe tricuspid stenosis appears well tolerated over several years of follow-up.

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Tricuspid stenosis is mostly associated with mitral valve abnormalities. Common symptoms include dyspnea, peripheral edema, and fatigue.

Signs and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Tricuspid stenosis often co-exists with mitral stenosis, thus depending on the severity of mitral valve pathology, symptoms differ. The diagnosis of TS may also be missed when they coexist. Patients can lay flat without any symptoms in the absence of serious mitral valve pathology and thus, not present with any signs of dyspnea. Characteristic findings of TS include an opening snap and a low to medium pitch diastolic rumbling murmur, usually localized to the lower left sternal border (fourth intercostal space) with inspiratory accentuation.

Echocardiogram

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) should be performed among patients with suspected TS to confirm the diagnosis, determine the etiology, and establish the baseline severity. TTE commonly reveals findings associated with other valvular diseases, such as tricuspid regurgitation and/or mitral stenosis. TS is mainly characterized by an elevated transvalvular gradient. TTE helps in the determination of the anatomic and hemodynamic characteristics of the tricuspid valve. TTE allows the detection of the following:

Doppler echocardiography: The evaluation of the severity of tricuspid stenosis is primarily done using the hemodynamic information provided by continuous-wave Doppler (CWD). Doppler echocardiography is useful to assess the severity of TS through the evaluation of the transvalvular gradient (the hallmark of a stenotic valve is an increase in transvalvular velocity recorded by CWD). The assessment of the tricuspid valve area is limited by the common association of TS with tricuspid regurgitation. The coexistence of tricuspid regurgitation causes the underestimation of the tricuspid valvular area. A tricuspid valve area < 1.0 cm2 is associated with increased severity of the TS.

Findings Associated with Increased Severity

TTE findings that are associated with increased severity of tricuspid stenosis include:

2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary

Class I
1. TTE is indicated in patients with TS to assess the anatomy of the valve complex, evaluate severity of stenosis, and characterize any associated regurgitation and/or left-sided valve disease. (Level of Evidence: C)”


Electrocardiogram

The electrocardiogram of patients with TS can demonstrate a sinus rhythm with or without right atrial hypertrophy. Patients with TS experience frequent arrhythmias, particularly atrial flutter and/or atrial fibrillation due to the enlargement of the right atrium. EKG findings suggestive of coexisting mitral valve disease can also be seen.

Chest X ray

The chest X-ray in a patient with tricuspid stenosis may show right atrial enlargement. The heart size can range from a normal-sized heart to cardiomegaly, with additional findings suggestive of coexisting valvular pathology such as mitral stenosis.

Cardiac MRI

While echocardiography remains the diagnostic imaging modality of choice, cardiac MRI is useful to evaluate tricuspid stenosis when the results of the echocardiography are insufficient.

ACC/AHA Guidelines- ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (DO NOT EDIT)

CMR may be used for assessing individuals with valvular heart disease in which evaluation of valvular stenosis, regurgitation, para- or perivalvular masses, perivalvular complications of infectious processes, or prosthetic valve disease are needed. CMR may be useful in identifying serial changes in LV volumes or mass in patients with valvular dysfunction.

Cardiac Catheterization

While echocardiography remains the diagnostic imaging modality of choice, cardiac catheterization is useful to evaluate tricuspid stenosis when the results of the non-invasive testing are insufficient, particularly among patients who are being evaluated for other conditions such as mitral stenosis and pulmonary hypertension. In the older pre-surgery population, cardiac catheterization may be necessary in order to assess concomitant artery disease.

Catheterization of the right heart is useful for the evaluation of:

Catheterization of the left heart is useful for the assessment of hemodynamic changes related to the aortic and mitral valves in patients with rheumatic heart disease.

2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary

Class IIb
1. Invasive hemodynamic assessment of severity of TS may be considered in symptomatic patients when clinical and noninvasive data are discordant. (Level of Evidence: C)

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Medical therapy with diuretics and sodium restriction for patients with TS with systemic venous congestion. Patients with TS should receive medical therapy for left heart failure, and/or pulmonary hypertension if they are present. Treatment of the underlying etiology and associated conditions/complications is necessary. Fibrinolytic therapy is the first line therapy for prosthetic tricuspid valve thrombosis resulting in tricuspid stenosis.

Surgery

Tricuspid valve surgery is recommended for patients undergoing surgical intervention for left valvular disease as well as among patients with severe symptomatic isolated TS. Tricuspid valve balloon valvuloplasty has a limited efficacy in the management of tricuspid stenosis.

2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary

Class I
1.Tricuspid valve surgery is recommended for patients with severe TS at the time of operation for left-sided valve disease. (Level of Evidence: C)”
Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Salih, M.D. Syed Musadiq Ali M.B.B.S.[2] Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [3]

Overview

Tricuspid stenosis (TS) staging sections into categories A, B, C, D. Stages C (without symptoms) and D (with symptoms). When valve and/or chordal thickening and calcification are evident, there are additional findings indicative of severe TS, for example, pressure gradient greater than or equal to 5 mm Hg, pressure half-time greater than or equal to 190 milliseconds, valve area less than or equal to 1.0 cm^2, associated moderate right atrial enlargement, and inferior vena cava dilatation.

Classification

Tricuspid stenosis (TS) is staged based on the valve anatomy and hemodynamics, and the hemodynamic consequences. No criteria for Stage A or B were included in the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology valve guidelines. Stage C is defined as severe TS without symptoms. Stage D is defined as severe TS with symptoms.[1][2]

Stage Definition Valve anatomy Valve hemodynamics Hemodynamic consequences Symptoms
C, D Severe TS Thickened, distorted, calcified leaflets
  • T ½ ≥190 ms 
  • Valve area ≤1.0 cm2
Right atrial / Inferior vena cava enlargement
  • Stage C-No symptoms
  • Stage D-Symptoms variable and dependent on the severity of associated valve disease and degree of obstruction

References

  1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Guyton RA; et al. (2014). “2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 63 (22): e57–185. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536. PMID 24603191.
  2. Baumgartner, Helmut; Hung, Judy; Bermejo, Javier; Chambers, John B.; Evangelista, Arturo; Griffin, Brian P.; Iung, Bernard; Otto, Catherine M.; Pellikka, Patricia A.; Quiñones, Miguel (2009). “Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Stenosis: EAE/ASE Recommendations for Clinical Practice”. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 22 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029. ISSN 0894-7317.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Salih, M.D. Syed Musadiq Ali M.B.B.S.[2] Fatimo Biobaku M.B.B.S [3] Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [4]

Overview

Tricuspid stenosis (TS) is characterized by structural changes in the tricuspid valve. The pathophysiology of tricuspid valve depends on the underlying etiology. In rheumatic heart disease which is the most common cause of tricuspid stenosis, there is fibrous thickening of the valve leaflets and chordae tendineae with/without fusion of the commissures as a result of inflammation. The obstruction to right ventricular filling due to the stenotic tricuspid valve can result in systemic venous hypertension and congestion.

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis

Normal surgical anatomy. (a) Superior view of the tricuspid valve shows the anterior leaflet (A), which is the largest; the septal leaflet (S), which is the smallest; and the posterior/inferior leaflet (P). (b) Another view of the tricuspid valve showing the papillary muscles, which are more numerous, smaller and more widely separated than those on the left side of the heart. Case courtesy by Soham Shah et al[8]


Associated Conditions

References

  1. Shah PM, Raney AA (February 2008). “Tricuspid valve disease”. Curr Probl Cardiol. 33 (2): 47–84. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2007.10.004. PMID 18222317.
  2. [+https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124202191000124?via%3Dihub “Valvular Heart Disease – ScienceDirect”] Check |url= value (help).
  3. Farag M, Arif R, Sabashnikov A, Zeriouh M, Popov AF, Ruhparwar A, Schmack B, Dohmen PM, Szabó G, Karck M, Weymann A (February 2017). “Repair or Replacement for Isolated Tricuspid Valve Pathology? Insights from a Surgical Analysis on Long-Term Survival”. Med. Sci. Monit. 23: 1017–1025. doi:10.12659/msm.900841. PMC 5338566. PMID 28236633.
  4. Salem A, Abdelgawad A, Elshemy A (August 2018). “Early and Midterm Outcomes of Rheumatic Mitral Valve Repair”. Heart Surg Forum. 21 (5): E352–E358. doi:10.1532/hsf.1978. PMID 30311884. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Waller BF, Howard J, Fess S (1995). “Pathology of tricuspid valve stenosis and pure tricuspid regurgitation–Part I.” Clin Cardiol. 18 (2): 97–102. PMID 7720297.
  6. Nishimura RA, Carabello BA (May 2012). “Hemodynamics in the cardiac catheterization laboratory of the 21st century”. Circulation. 125 (17): 2138–50. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.060319. PMID 22547754.
  7. Hinton RB, Lincoln J, Deutsch GH, Osinska H, Manning PB, Benson DW, Yutzey KE (June 2006). “Extracellular matrix remodeling and organization in developing and diseased aortic valves”. Circ. Res. 98 (11): 1431–8. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000224114.65109.4e. PMID 16645142.
  8. “Multimodal imaging of the tricuspid valve: normal appearance and pathological entities”.
  9. Mathur A, Sharma N, Goyal P, Mittal P (August 2019). “Surgical Algorithm for Rheumatic Tricuspid Disease”. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 108 (2): e129–e132. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.009. PMID 30885854.
  10. Itzhaki Ben Zadok O, Sagie A, Vaturi M, Shapira Y, Schwartzenberg S, Kuznitz I, Shochat T, Bental T, Yedidya I, Aravot D, Kornowski R, Sharony R (February 2019). “Long-Term Outcomes After Mitral Valve Replacement and Tricuspid Annuloplasty in Rheumatic Patients”. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 107 (2): 539–545. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.09.012. PMID 30617023.
  11. Waller BF, Howard J, Fess S (March 1995). “Pathology of tricuspid valve stenosis and pure tricuspid regurgitation–Part II”. Clin Cardiol. 18 (3): 167–74. doi:10.1002/clc.4960180312. PMID 7743689.
  12. Hayes AR, Davar J, Caplin ME (September 2018). “Carcinoid Heart Disease: A Review”. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 47 (3): 671–682. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2018.04.012. PMID 30098723.
  13. Hassan SA, Banchs J, Iliescu C, Dasari A, Lopez-Mattei J, Yusuf SW (October 2017). “Carcinoid heart disease”. Heart. 103 (19): 1488–1495. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311261. PMID 28596302.
  14. Perry D, Hayek SS (November 2019). “Carcinoid Heart Disease: A Guide for Clinicians”. Cardiol Clin. 37 (4): 497–503. doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2019.07.014. PMID 31587790.
  15. Aboukhoudir F, Boulet V, Rekik S, Pansieri M (November 2017). “[Lead-related infective endocarditis with massive vegetation causing severe functionnal tricuspid stenosis]”. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) (in French). 66 (5): 326–329. doi:10.1016/j.ancard.2017.09.012. PMID 29050737.

Template:WH

Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Salih, M.D. Syed Musadiq Ali M.B.B.S.[2] Rim Halaby, M.D. [3]

Overview

The most common cause of tricuspid stenosis (TS) is rheumatic heart disease. Other causes of tricuspid stenosis include carcinoid syndrome, congenital abnormalities, endocarditis, lupus, and mechanical obstruction by a tumor.

Causes

Common Causes

Less Common Causes

Causes by Organ System

Cardiovascular Congenital heart disease, cardiac tumor, saphenous vein bypass graft aneurysm, Ebstein’s anomaly, endomyocardial fibrosis, infective endocarditis, myxoma, rheumatic heart disease.[12]
Chemical/Poisoning No underlying causes
Dental No underlying causes
Dermatologic No underlying causes
Drug Side Effect Methysergide
Ear Nose Throat No underlying causes
Endocrine Carcinoid syndrome
Environmental No underlying causes
Gastroenterologic No underlying causes
Genetic No underlying causes
Hematologic No underlying causes
Iatrogenic Pacemaker infection, pacemaker leads[13], device closure of right coronary arteriovenous fistula.[14]
Infectious Disease Infective endocarditis
Musculoskeletal/Orthopedic No underlying causes
Neurologic No underlying causes
Nutritional/Metabolic Fabry disease, Whipple’s disease
Obstetric/Gynecologic No underlying causes
Oncologic Carcinoid syndrome, cardiac tumor, intravenous leiomyomatous tumor,[10] metastatic tumor, myxoma
Ophthalmologic No underlying causes
Overdose/Toxicity No underlying causes
Psychiatric No underlying causes
Pulmonary No underlying causes
Renal/Electrolyte No underlying causes
Rheumatology/Immunology/Allergy Amyloidosis,[15] systemic lupus erythematosus
Sexual No underlying causes
Trauma No underlying causes
Urologic No underlying causes
Miscellaneous Giant blood cyst

Causes by Alphabetical Order

References

  1. Roberts WC, Ko JM (July 2008). “Some observations on mitral and aortic valve disease”. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 21 (3): 282–99. doi:10.1080/08998280.2008.11928412. PMC 2446420. PMID 18628928.
  2. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP; et al. (2009). “Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice”. Eur J Echocardiogr. 10 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jen303. PMID 19065003.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Waller BF, Howard J, Fess S (1995). “Pathology of tricuspid valve stenosis and pure tricuspid regurgitation–Part I.” Clin Cardiol. 18 (2): 97–102. PMID 7720297.
  4. Pellikka PA, Tajik AJ, Khandheria BK, Seward JB, Callahan JA, Pitot HC, Kvols LK (April 1993). “Carcinoid heart disease. Clinical and echocardiographic spectrum in 74 patients”. Circulation. 87 (4): 1188–96. doi:10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1188. PMID 7681733.
  5. Gur AK, Odabasi D, Kunt AG, Kunt AS (July 2014). “Isolated tricuspid valve repair for Libman-Sacks endocarditis”. Echocardiography. 31 (6): E166–8. doi:10.1111/echo.12558. PMID 24661289.
  6. Al-Hijji M, Yoon Park J, El Sabbagh A, Amin M, Maleszewski JJ, Borgeson DD (August 2015). “The Forgotten Valve: Isolated Severe Tricuspid Valve Stenosis”. Circulation. 132 (7): e123–5. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016315. PMID 26283605.
  7. Şaşkın H, Düzyol Ç, Özcan KS, Aksoy R (August 2015). “Right atrial myxoma mimicking tricuspid stenosis”. BMJ Case Rep. 2015. doi:10.1136/bcr-2015-210818. PMC 4550937. PMID 26272962.
  8. Khatib N, Blumenfeld Z, Bronshtein M (November 2012). “Early prenatal diagnosis of tricuspid stenosis”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 207 (5): e6–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.030. PMID 22964066.
  9. Akram Q, Saravanan D, Levy R (April 2011). “Valvuloplasty for tricuspid stenosis caused by a ventriculoatrial shunt”. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 77 (5): 722–5. doi:10.1002/ccd.22745. PMID 20824751.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Nili M, Liban E, Levy MJ (June 1982). “Tricuspid stenosis due to intravenous leiomyomatosis–a call for caution: case report and review of the literature”. Tex Heart Inst J. 9 (2): 231–5. PMC 351617. PMID 15226964.
  11. Muraru D, Badano LP, Sarais C, Soldà E, Iliceto S (June 2011). “Evaluation of tricuspid valve morphology and function by transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography”. Curr Cardiol Rep. 13 (3): 242–9. doi:10.1007/s11886-011-0176-3. PMID 21365261.
  12. Jellis CL, Navia JL, Flamm SD, Rodriguez LL (2016). “Severe Functional Tricuspid Stenosis Secondary to a Giant Saphenous Vein Bypass Graft Aneurysm”. Circulation. 133 (21): 2099–102. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.014772. PMID 27217436 PMID: 27217436 Check |pmid= value (help).
  13. Taira K, Suzuki A, Fujino A, Watanabe T, Ogyu A, Ashikawa K (2006). “Tricuspid valve stenosis related to subvalvular adhesion of pacemaker lead: a case report”. J Cardiol. 47 (6): 301–6. PMID 16800373.
  14. Changchien C, Lin MT, Wang CC, Liu HM, Wang CC, Chiu SN; et al. (2015). “Neonatal tricuspid stenosis caused by device closure of a large coronary fistula”. EuroIntervention. 11 (7): e1. doi:10.4244/EIJV11I7A162. PMID 26603866 PMID: 26603866 Check |pmid= value (help).
  15. 15.0 15.1 Kim KH, Park CH, Park HS, Kim YR, Choi EY (2014). “Amyloidosis-induced tricuspid stenosis mimicking rheumatic heart disease”. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 15 (10): 1167. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeu075. PMID 24797117.

Template:WH

Template:WS

Differentiating Tricuspid stenosis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Salih, M.D. Syed Musadiq Ali M.B.B.S.[2] Rim Halaby, M.D. [3] Fatimo Biobaku M.B.B.S [4]

Overview

The differential diagnosis of tricuspid stenosis includes valvular abnormalities causing a similar clinical presentation, and other causes of systemic venous congestion such as constrictive pericarditis.

Differential Diagnosis

Diseases History Symptoms Physical Examination Murmur Diagnosis Other Findings
ECG CXR Echocardiogram Cardiac Catheterization
Mitral Stenosis
  • Apical impulse displaced laterally or not palpable
  • Low pitched
  • Opening snap followed by a decrescendo-crescendo rumbling murmur
  • Intensity increases after a valsalva maneuver, after exercise and after increased after load (eg., squatting, isometric hand grip)
  • Straightening of the left border of the heart suggestive of enlargement of the left atrium
  • Double right heart border (Enlarged left atrium and normal right atrium)
  • Prominent left atrial appendage
  • Reduced valve leaflet mobility
  • Valve calcification
  • Doming of mitral valve
  • Valve thickening
  • Enlargement of left atrium
Right heart catheterization:

Left heart catheterization:

  • Pressures in left ventricle
  • Determines the gradient between the left and right atrium during ventricular diastole (a marker of the severity of mitral stenosis)
Mitral Regurgitation
  • Trauma
  • Symptoms of heart failure in severe cases
Palpation
  • Brisk carotid upstroke and hyperdymanic carotid impulse on palpation
  • Apical impulse is displaced to left
  • S3 and a palpable thrill

Auscultation

  • Murmur
  • High pitched, blowing
  • Radiates to the axilla
  • Best heard with the diaphragm of the stethoscope at the apex in left lateral decubitus position
  • Intensity increases with hand grip or squatting
Acute MR

Chronic MR

  • Enlarged cardiac silhouette
  • Straightening of left heart border
  • Splaying of subcarinal angle
  • Calcification of mitral annulus
  • Double right heart border
  • Enlargement of left atrium and ventricle
  • Identify valve abnormality
  • Valve calcification
  • Severity of regurgitation
  • Grading of MR is done with left ventriculography
Atrial septal defect
  • Frequent respiratory or lung infections
  • Dyspnea
  • Tiring when feeding (Infants)
  • Shortness of breath on exertion
  • Palpitations
  • Swelling of feet
Inspection
  • Precordial bulge
  • Precordial lift

Palpation

  • Right ventricular impulse
  • Pulmonary artery pulsations
  • Thrill

Auscultation

  • Murmur
  • Midsystolic (ejection systolic) murmur
  • Widely split, fixed S2
  • Upper left sternal border
  • Increased pulmonary markings
  • Cardiomegaly
  • Triangular appearance of heart
  • Schimitar sign
Left Atrial Myxoma
  • Symptoms may mimic mitral stenosis
Skin

Auscultation:

  • Lung: Fine crepitations
  • Heart: Characteristic “tumor plop”
  • Early diastolic sound as “tumor plop”
  • Low frequency diastolic murmur may be heard if the tumor obstructing mitral valve
  • Often normal
  • Often normal

Rare findings:

  • cardiomegaly
  • Left atrial enlargement
  • tumor calcification etc.,
  • Useful to detect vascular supply of the tumor by the coronary arteries
  • Associated with Carney complex (genetic predisposition)
Prosthetic Valve Obstruction
  • History of valve replacement
  • Systemic embolism
  • Shortness of breath
  • Fatigue
Ausculation

Muffling of murmur

  • Muffling or disappearance of prosthetic sounds
  • Appearance of new regurgitant or obstructive murmur
  • Degree of stenosis
  • Assess thrombus size and location
  • Differentiate between thrombus, pannus and vegetations
Causes:
  • Thrombus
  • Pannus formation
Cor Triatriatum
  • Dsypnea on exertion
  • Orthopnea
  • Tachypnea
  • Palpitations
  • Growth failure
Auscultation
  • Murmur

Other findings

  • Signs of heart failure
  • Diastolic murmur with loud P2
  • No opening snap or a loud S1
Non specific but may have
  • Normal cardiac silhouette
  • Hemodynamic changes similar to mitral stenosis (non specific findings)
  • Direct visualization of membrane through the atrium
  • +/- visualization of accessory chamber
  • Normal left ventricular hemodynamic profile with a trans atrial gradient
Types
  • Cor triatriatum sinistrum
  • Cor triatriatum dextrum
Congenital Mitral Stenosis
  • Respiratory distress shortly after birth
  • Recurrent severe pulmonary infections
  • Other associated congenital cardiovascular anamolies
  • Atrial fibrillation

Infants:

  • Exhaustion and sweating on feeding
  • Rapid breathing
  • Failure to thrive
  • Pulmonary infections
  • Chronic cough

Older patients:

  • Dyspnea
  • Orthopnea
  • Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea
  • Peripheral edema
  • Fatigue
Auscultation
  • Murmur

Other findings

  • Signs of heart failure
Mild-Moderate
  • Loud S1
  • Loud P2
  • Low-frequency diastolic murmur best heard at the apex

Severe

  • Soft S1
  • Loud pulmonic component of S2 with the minimal respiratory splitting of S2
  • Holodiastolic murmur with presystolic accentuation best heard at the apex
  • Early diastolic murmur of pulmonic valve regurgitation
  • Sharp P waves in leads I and II
  • Inversion of P wave in lead III
  • Marked Q waves in leads II and III
  • Left atrial dilation
  • Moderate enlargement of right heart
  • Pulmonary venous congestion
  • Esophageal compression
  • Reduced valve leaflet mobility
  • Left atrial size
  • Severity of mitral stenosis
Very rare condition
Supravalvular Ring Mitral Stenosis
  • Other associated congenital heart defects
  • Fatigue
  • Frequent respiratory infections
  • Failure to thrive
  • Poor feeding
  • Precocious congestive heart failure
  • Shortness of breath
  • Tachypnea
  • Dyspnea
  • Nocturnal cough
  • Heamoptysis
  • Syncope
Auscultation:

Lungs: Fine, crepitant rales and rhonchi or wheezes may be present

Heart: Murmur

  • An apical mid diastolic murmur with presystolic accentuation
  • No opening snap
  • The murmur is more prominent if associated with VSD or PDA
  • Left atrial and ventricular enlargement
  • Alveolar edema
Supramitral ring:
  • Associated with normal mitral valve apparatus

Intramitral ring:

  • Hypomobility of the posterior leaflet
  • Reduced interpapillary muscle distance
  • Reduced chordal length
  • Dominant papillary muscle
  • Hypoplastic mitral annulus

(Difficult to visualize membrane <1mm in size)

  • Persistently elevated pulmonary venous pressures
  • Increased pulmonary artery pressure
Types
  • Supramitral
  • Intramitral

It is attached between the opening of the atrial appendage and the mitral annulus which helps in differentiating with Cor triatriatum sinister.

  • Intramitral type is associated with shone complex

References

  1. Waller BF, Howard J, Fess S (1995). “Pathology of tricuspid valve stenosis and pure tricuspid regurgitation–Part I.” Clin Cardiol. 18 (2): 97–102. PMID 7720297.
  2. Nassar PN, Hamdan RH (2011). “Cor Triatriatum Sinistrum: Classification and Imaging Modalities”. Eur J Cardiovasc Med. 1 (3): 84–87. doi:10.5083/ejcm.20424884.21. PMC 3286827. PMID 22379596.
  3. Roudaut R, Serri K, Lafitte S (2007). “Thrombosis of prosthetic heart valves: diagnosis and therapeutic considerations”. Heart. 93 (1): 137–42. doi:10.1136/hrt.2005.071183. PMC 1861363. PMID 17170355.
  4. Apostolakis EE, Baikoussis NG (2009). “Methods of estimation of mitral valve regurgitation for the cardiac surgeon”. J Cardiothorac Surg. 4: 34. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-4-34. PMC 2723095. PMID 19604402.
  5. Alboliras ET, Edwards WD, Driscoll DJ, Seward JB (1987). “Cor triatriatum dexter: two-dimensional echocardiographic diagnosis”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 9 (2): 334–7. PMID 3805524.
  6. Gibson DG, Honey M, Lennox SC (1974). “Cor triatriatum. Diagnosis by echocardiography”. Br Heart J. 36 (8): 835–8. PMC 458901. PMID 4412638.
  7. Cor triatrium https://radiopaedia.org/articles/cor-triatriatum (2016) Accessed on November 29, 2016
  8. Sosland RP, Vacek JL, Gorton ME (2007). “Congenital mitral stenosis: a rare presentation and novel approach to management”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 133 (2): 572–3. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.025. PMID 17258606.
  9. Driscoll DJ, Gutgesell HP, McNamara DG (1978). “Echocardiographic features of congenital mitral stenosis”. Am J Cardiol. 42 (2): 259–66. PMID 685838.
  10. Bonou M, Lampropoulos K, Barbetseas J (2012). “Prosthetic heart valve obstruction: thrombolysis or surgical treatment?”. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 1 (2): 122–7. doi:10.1177/2048872612451169. PMC 3760527. PMID 24062899.
  11. Maganti K, Rigolin VH, Sarano ME, Bonow RO (2010). “Valvular heart disease: diagnosis and management”. Mayo Clin Proc. 85 (5): 483–500. doi:10.4065/mcp.2009.0706. PMC 2861980. PMID 20435842.
  12. DEXTER L (1956). “Atrial septal defect”. Br Heart J. 18 (2): 209–25. PMC 479579. PMID 13315850.
  13. Webb G, Gatzoulis MA (2006). “Atrial septal defects in the adult: recent progress and overview”. Circulation. 114 (15): 1645–53. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.592055. PMID 17030704.
  14. Geva T, Martins JD, Wald RM (2014). “Atrial septal defects”. Lancet. 383 (9932): 1921–32. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62145-5. PMID 24725467.
  15. Demir M, Akpinar O, Acarturk E (2005). “Atrial myxoma: an unusual cause of myocardial infarction”. Tex Heart Inst J. 32 (3): 445–7. PMC 1336732. PMID 16392241.
  16. MacGowan SW, Sidhu P, Aherne T, Luke D, Wood AE, Neligan MC; et al. (1993). “Atrial myxoma: national incidence, diagnosis and surgical management”. Ir J Med Sci. 162 (6): 223–6. PMID 8407260.
  17. Circulation http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/119/7/1034 (2016) Accessed on December 7, 2016
  18. Alphonso N, Nørgaard MA, Newcomb A, d’Udekem Y, Brizard CP, Cochrane A (2005). “Cor triatriatum: presentation, diagnosis and long-term surgical results”. Ann Thorac Surg. 80 (5): 1666–71. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.055. PMID 16242436.
  19. circulation http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/36/1/101 (1967) Accessed on 7 December, 2016
  20. Moore P, Adatia I, Spevak PJ, Keane JF, Perry SB, Castaneda AR; et al. (1994). “Severe congenital mitral stenosis in infants”. Circulation. 89 (5): 2099–106. PMID 8181134.
  21. Uva MS, Galletti L, Gayet FL, Piot D, Serraf A, Bruniaux J; et al. (1995). “Surgery for congenital mitral valve disease in the first year of life”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 109 (1): 164–74, discussion 174-6. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70432-9. PMID 7815793.
  22. Banerjee A, Kohl T, Silverman NH (1995). “Echocardiographic evaluation of congenital mitral valve anomalies in children”. Am J Cardiol. 76 (17): 1284–91. PMID 7503011.
  23. Sullivan ID, Robinson PJ, de Leval M, Graham TP (1986). “Membranous supravalvular mitral stenosis: a treatable form of congenital heart disease”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 8 (1): 159–64. PMID 3711511.
  24. Subramaniam V, Herle A, Mohammed N, Thahir M (2011). “Ortner’s syndrome: case series and literature review”. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 77 (5): 559–62. PMID 22030961.

Template:WH

Template:WS

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Salih, M.D. Syed Musadiq Ali M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

Tricuspid stenosis (TS) is the least common valvular disease. TS is rarely an isolated disease, it is mostly associated with mitral valve and/or aortic valve abnormalities. Approximately 8% of patients with rheumatic heart disease develop isolated TS, while up to 50% develop tricuspid regurgitation and TS. The prevalence of TS is lower in developed countries compared to developing countries due to the low prevalence of rheumatic heart disease, which is the most common cause of TS.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

Age

Gender

Race

  • No racial predisposition is apparent.

References

  1. Goswami KC, Rao MB, Dev V, Shrivastava S (1999). “Juvenile tricuspid stenosis and rheumatic tricuspid valve disease: an echocardiographic study”. Int J Cardiol. 72 (1): 83–6. PMID 10636636.
  2. Manjunath CN, Srinivas P, Ravindranath KS, Dhanalakshmi C (2014). “Incidence and patterns of valvular heart disease in a tertiary care high-volume cardiac center: a single center experience”. Indian Heart J. 66 (3): 320–6. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2014.03.010. PMC 4121759. PMID 24973838.
  3. Marciniak A, Glover K, Sharma R (January 2017). “Cohort profile: prevalence of valvular heart disease in community patients with suspected heart failure in UK”. BMJ Open. 7 (1): e012240. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012240. PMC 5278264. PMID 28131996.


Template:WHTemplate:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Salih, M.D. Syed Musadiq Ali M.B.B.S.[2] Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [3]

Overview

The most potent risk factor in the development of tricuspid valve stenosis is rheumatic fever or infective endocarditis. Other risk factors include congenital heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, cardiac tumors, and heart attack.

Risk Factors

Common Risk Factors

Less Common Risk Factors

References

  1. Şaşkın H, Düzyol Ç, Özcan KS, Aksoy R (2015). “Right atrial myxoma mimicking tricuspid stenosis”. BMJ Case Rep. 2015. doi:10.1136/bcr-2015-210818. PMC 4550937. PMID 26272962.
  2. Pellikka PA, Tajik AJ, Khandheria BK, Seward JB, Callahan JA, Pitot HC; et al. (1993). “Carcinoid heart disease. Clinical and echocardiographic spectrum in 74 patients”. Circulation. 87 (4): 1188–96. doi:10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1188. PMID 7681733.
  3. Roberts, William Clifford; Ko, Jong Mi (2017). “Some Observations on Mitral and Aortic Valve Disease”. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings. 21 (3): 282–299. doi:10.1080/08998280.2008.11928412. ISSN 0899-8280.
  4. Waller BF, Howard J, Fess S (1995). “Pathology of tricuspid valve stenosis and pure tricuspid regurgitation–Part I.” Clin Cardiol. 18 (2): 97–102. doi:10.1002/clc.4960180212. PMID 7720297.
  5. Seibert KA, Rettenmier CW, Waller BF, Battle WE, Levine AS, Roberts WC (1982). “Osteogenic sarcoma metastatic to the heart”. Am J Med. 73 (1): 136–41. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(82)90940-8. PMID 6953763.
  6. Gur AK, Odabasi D, Kunt AG, Kunt AS (2014). “Isolated tricuspid valve repair for Libman-Sacks endocarditis”. Echocardiography. 31 (6): E166–8. doi:10.1111/echo.12558. PMID 24661289.
  7. Khatib N, Blumenfeld Z, Bronshtein M (2012). “Early prenatal diagnosis of tricuspid stenosis”. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 207 (5): e6–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.030. PMID 22964066.
  8. Akram Q, Saravanan D, Levy R (2011). “Valvuloplasty for tricuspid stenosis caused by a ventriculoatrial shunt”. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 77 (5): 722–5. doi:10.1002/ccd.22745. PMID 20824751.
  9. Nili M, Liban E, Levy MJ (1982). “Tricuspid stenosis due to intravenous leiomyomatosis–a call for caution: case report and review of the literature”. Tex Heart Inst J. 9 (2): 231–5. PMC 351617. PMID 15226964.
  10. Muraru D, Badano LP, Sarais C, Soldà E, Iliceto S (2011). “Evaluation of tricuspid valve morphology and function by transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography”. Curr Cardiol Rep. 13 (3): 242–9. doi:10.1007/s11886-011-0176-3. PMID 21365261.

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Salih, M.D. Syed Musadiq Ali M.B.B.S.[2]

Overview

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for tricuspid stenosis.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for tricuspid stenosis.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Prgnosis

  • The prognosis of tricuspid stenosis depends on the precipitating/underlying cause.
  • The general mortality rate is approximately 5%.
Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic study of choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X-Ray Findings | Echocardiography and Ultrasound | CT-Scan Findings | MRI Findings | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Interventions | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Treatment

The treatment is usually by surgery (tricuspid valve replacement) or percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty. The resultant tricuspid regurgitation from percutaneous treatment is better tolerated than insufficiency that occurs following mitral valvuloplasty

References

Template:WH

Template:WS

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

References

References

Template:WH

Template:WS

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH