Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Pancreatic fistula

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

A pancreatic fistula is an abnormal communication between the pancreas and other organs due to leakage of pancreatic secretions from damaged pancreatic duct. An external pancreatic fistula is one that communicates with the skin, and is also known as a pancreaticocutaneous fistula, whereas an internal pancreatic fistula communicates with other internal organs or spaces. Pancreatic fistulas can be caused by pancreatic disease, trauma, or surgery. Pancreatic fistula can be classified anatomically as internal fistula and external fistula. Pancreatic fistula can also be classified based on the anatomy of the pancreatic duct and the location of injury as Type 1 pancreatic fistula, Type 2 pancreatic fistula and Type 3 pancreatic fistula. The disruption of the pancreatic duct either from an iatrogenic insult, underlying inflammatory process or trauma results in the leakage of the pancreatic fluid inducing inflammation and erosions, thereby forming abnormal connections with the surrounding structures. The etiology of pancreatic fistula include iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic insults. Differential diagnosis of pancreatic fistula may include chronic liver disease, renal failure, heart failure, malignancy, pleural effusion, pancreatitis, retroperitoneal bleeding and bowel ischemia. The incidence of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection surgery varies from 5% to 26%. The overall mortality risk due to pancreatic fistula is 1%, however patients with grade C pancreatic fistula carries a mortality risk of 25%. According to Fistula Risk Scoring (FRS) system, the risk factors for the development of pancreatic fistula depends upon the texture of the gland, underlying pathology, diameter of the pancreatic duct, underlying carcinoma involving the pancreatic duct, intraoperative blood loss and other risk factors such as male gender, obesity, malnutrition, increase gland remnant volume, fasting blood glucose level <108 mg/dl and excessive fluid administration during surgery. Clinical presentation may range from being asymptomatic to showing a variety of signs and symptoms resulting from fluid accumulation such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, infection, tachycardia, pain, weight loss, ileus and severe symptoms such as unrelenting pain and sepsis. External pancreatic fistula presents with pancreatic fluid accumulation noticeable on the skin surface. Internal pancreatic fistula may present with ascites or pleural effusion as fluid accumulates within the abdominal or thoracic cavity. Complications following a pancreatic fistula may include Wound infection and sepsis, Hemorrhage, Internal and/or external fistula, Pancreatic pseudocyst, Delayed gastric emptying, Walled off pancreatic necrosis, Prolongation of the hospital stay, Pancreatic ascites, High amylase pleural effusion, Disconnected duct syndrome, Multisystem involvement eventually leading to multiorgan failure and/or death. Pancreatic fistula that are less severe are reported to heal in a duration of 4-6 weeks with conservative management only. 80% of the external fistula and 50-65% of the internal fistula are reported to close eventually with conservative measures which involve stabilization of the patient with supportive therapies. However, pancreatic fistula can lead to significant morbidity if not addressed on time. Surgical intervention provides resolution of the fistula with a 90-92% success rate. A pancreatic fistula with leakage of fluid can be diagnosed in some cases with typical history and clinical presentation, such as patient presenting with pancreatitis followed by recurrence, persistent symptoms or post pancreatic resection fluid drainage with increase amylase level. Patients diagnosed with pancreatic fistula are sometimes asymptomatic while some patients may present with symptoms such as marked recent weight loss, unresponsiveness of the ascites to diuretics, non-specific symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, infection, and tachycardia and some patients with a high grade fistula may present with sepsis. Patients with pancreatic fistula usually appear normal and in some they appear malnourished. Physical examination of patients with pancreatic fistula is usually remarkable for infection, dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain and ascites. Pleural or ascitic fluid should be sent for analysis. An elevated amylase level, usually > 1,000 IU/L, with protein levels over 3.0 g/dL is diagnostic. Complete blood count is necessary to check for any ongoing infection or hemorrhage. Complete metabolic panel including inflammatory markers, serum electrolytes, liver function tests, calcium, albumin, amylase and lipase should be sent to laboratory for evaluation. Furthermore, pancreatic fistula leak presenting as ascites or pleural effusion should be analyzed for fluid protein, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, glucose, gram cultures and total cell count. Thoracopancreatic fistula may lead to pleural effusion which can be detected incidentally on a plain chest radiograph. Pancreatic fistula can be diagnosed using abdominal CT scan as it is primarily used to rule out other causes of the abdominal discomfort. The CT scan may demonstrate fluid collections in the thoracic or abdominal cavity or changes associated with acute or chronic pancreatitis leading to pancreatic fistula. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to predict the formation of pancreatic fistula by calculating the pancreatic remnant volume (PRV) and measuring the width of the pancreatic duct at the line of resection. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is used to diagnose as well as treat the fistula with placement of pancreatic stent during the procedure. ERCP demonstrate filling of the pancreatic duct with contrast and extravasation of the contrast suggesting disruption of the pancreatic duct. Pancreatic fistula is a known complication following a pancreatic surgery. Post operation management is focused towards prevention of complications arising as a consequence of pancreatic secretion from an anastomotic stump or the surface of skin which can subsequently complicate into intraabdominal abscess formation or life threatening hemorrhage. To reduce the risk of development of a post-operative pancreatic fistula, prophylactic measures such as nutrition support, prophylactic somatostatin analogues, drain management and a post-operation follow up is taken to reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula formation. Treatment of pancreatic fistula includes early recognition of the problem which is the key to careful management in order to prevent the consequent complications. Medical therapy is tailored towards the suppression of pancreatic enzymes by restricting the patient’s oral intake of food in conjunction with the use of long-acting somatostatin analogues such as octreotide. Correction of the fluid and electrolyte abnormalities. The patient’s nutrition is maintained with total parenteral nutrition. This treatment is continued for 2-3 weeks, and the patient is observed for improvement. Patients with expanding peripancreatic fluid on abdominal imaging or with persistent symptoms undergo endoscopic therapy via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as it is a preferred approach towards the management of a symptomatic pancreatic fistula due to its diagnostic as well as therapeutic value. A transpapillary pancreatic stent is placed during ERCP and/or a pancreatic sphincterectomy is done. If no improvement is seen or endoscopic therapy is not feasible, the patient may receive surgical treatment. Surgical treatment depends upon the location of the fistula where the duct is disrupted, the size of the peripancreatic fluid collection, presence of vascular thrombosis, tissue necrosis and history of previous interventions. Surgical treatment may involve the drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst if indicated, which is often associated with chronic pancreatic fistula. Other options may include fistulojejunostomy, pancreatic resection and decompression of the pancreatic duct with pancreatojejunostomy.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

There is no historical perspective related to pancreatic fistula.

Historical Perspective

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

Pancreatic fistula can be classified anatomically as internal fistula and external fistula. Pancreatic fistula can also be classified based on the anatomy of the pancreatic duct and the location of injury as Type 1 pancreatic fistula, Type 2 pancreatic fistula and Type 3 pancreatic fistula.

Classification

Pancreatic fistula can be classified anatomically as;

Pancreatic fistula can also be classified based on the anatomy of the pancreatic duct and the location of injury as;

Pancreatic fistula is classified into two categories on the basis of clinical manifestations, complications and severity by the ISGPF as;


References

  1. Morgan KA, Adams DB (2007). “Management of internal and external pancreatic fistulas”. Surg Clin North Am. 87 (6): 1503–13, x. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2007.08.008. PMID 18053844.
  2. Mutignani M, Dokas S, Tringali A, Forti E, Pugliese F, Cintolo M; et al. (2017). “Pancreatic Leaks and Fistulae: An Endoscopy-Oriented Classification”. Dig Dis Sci. 62 (10): 2648–2657. doi:10.1007/s10620-017-4697-5. PMID 28780610.
  3. Jiang L, Ning D, Chen X (2020). “Prevention and treatment of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic body and tail resection: current status and future directions”. Front Med. 14 (3): 251–261. doi:10.1007/s11684-019-0727-3. PMID 31840199.

Template:WH Template:WS

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

The disruption of the pancreatic duct either from an iatrogenic insult, underlying inflammatory process or trauma results in the leakage of the pancreatic fluid inducing inflammation and erosions, thereby forming abnormal connections with the surrounding structures.

Pathophysiology

References

  1. Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A (2018). “Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts”. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 11: 105–118. doi:10.2147/CEG.S120217. PMC 5858541. PMID 29588609.
  2. Hackert T, Werner J, Büchler MW (2011). “Postoperative pancreatic fistula”. Surgeon. 9 (4): 211–7. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2010.10.011. PMID 21672661.
  3. Kaman L, Behera A, Singh R, Katariya RN (2001). “Internal pancreatic fistulas with pancreatic ascites and pancreatic pleural effusions: recognition and management”. ANZ J Surg. 71 (4): 221–5. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02077.x. PMID 11355730.
  4. Kochhar R, Goenka MK, Nagi B, Singh K (1995). “Pancreatic ascites and pleural effusion treated by endoscopic pancreatic stent placement”. Indian J Gastroenterol. 14 (3): 106–7. PMID 7657363.
  5. Neumann S, Caca K, Mössner J (2004). “[Pancreatico-pleural fistula in chronic pancreatitis with necrosis of the pancreatic tail]”. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 129 (34–35): 1802–5. doi:10.1055/s-2004-829032. PMID 15314743.
  6. Uchiyama T, Suzuki T, Adachi A, Hiraki S, Iizuka N (1992). “Pancreatic pleural effusion: case report and review of 113 cases in Japan”. Am J Gastroenterol. 87 (3): 387–91. PMID 1539580.
  7. Fulcher AS, Capps GW, Turner MA (1999). “Thoracopancreatic fistula: clinical and imaging findings”. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 23 (2): 181–7. doi:10.1097/00004728-199903000-00004. PMID 10096323.

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

The etiology of pancreatic fistula include iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic insults.

Causes

Common Causes

Pancreatic fistula can result from different types of insults such as;[1][2]

References

  1. Larsen M, Kozarek R (2014). “Management of pancreatic ductal leaks and fistulae”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 29 (7): 1360–70. doi:10.1111/jgh.12574. PMID 24650171.
  2. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M; et al. (2017). “The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After”. Surgery. 161 (3): 584–591. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. PMID 28040257.

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Pancreatic fistula from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Zarlakhta Zamani, M.B.B.S[zamanizarlashta@yahoo.com]

Overview

Differential diagnosis of pancreatic fistula may include chronic liver disease, renal failure, heart failure, malignancy, pleural effusion, pancreatitis, retroperitoneal bleeding and bowel ischemia.

Differentiating Pancreatic fistula from other Diseases

Differential diagnosis of a pancreatic fistula may include evaluation for:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Diseases Symptoms Physical examination Lab Findings
Chronic liver disease
Renal failure
Heart failure
Pancreatitis
Retroperitoneal bleeding
Bowel ischemia
pleural effusion

References

  1. Cochrane J, Schlepp G (2015). “Acute on chronic pancreatitis causing a highway to the colon with subsequent road closure: pancreatic colonic fistula presenting as a large bowel obstruction treated with pancreatic duct stenting”. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2015: 794282. doi:10.1155/2015/794282. PMC 4381724. PMID 25893120.
  2. Meyer TW, Hostetter TH (2007). “Uremia”. N Engl J Med. 357 (13): 1316–25. doi:10.1056/NEJMra071313. PMID 17898101.
  3. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Jessup M, Konstam MA, Mancini DM, Michl K, Oates JA, Rahko PS, Silver MA, Stevenson LW, Yancy CW, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American College of Chest Physicians; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation; Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2005 Sep 20; 112(12): e154-235. Epub 2005 Sep 13. PMID 16160202
  4. Dokainish H, Zoghbi WA, Lakkis NM, Al-Bakshy F, Dhir M, Quinones MA; et al. (2004). “Optimal noninvasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparison of tissue Doppler echocardiography and B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with pulmonary artery catheters”. Circulation. 109 (20): 2432–9. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000127882.58426.7A. PMID 15123522.
  5. Kelder JC, Cowie MR, McDonagh TA, Hardman SM, Grobbee DE, Cost B; et al. (2011). “Quantifying the added value of BNP in suspected heart failure in general practice: an individual patient data meta-analysis”. Heart. 97 (12): 959–63. doi:10.1136/hrt.2010.220426. PMID 21478382.
  6. Dokainish H, Zoghbi WA, Lakkis NM, Quinones MA, Nagueh SF (2004). “Comparative accuracy of B-type natriuretic peptide and tissue Doppler echocardiography in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure”. Am J Cardiol. 93 (9): 1130–5. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.042. PMID 15110205.
  7. Maisel AS, McCord J, Nowak RM, Hollander JE, Wu AH, Duc P; et al. (2003). “Bedside B-Type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Results from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 41 (11): 2010–7. PMID 12798574.
  8. Ewald B, Ewald D, Thakkinstian A, Attia J (2008). “Meta-analysis of B type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of clinical heart failure and population screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction”. Intern Med J. 38 (2): 101–13. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01454.x. PMID 18290826.
  9. Heffner JE, Brown LK, Barbieri CA (1997). “Diagnostic value of tests that discriminate between exudative and transudative pleural effusions. Primary Study Investigators”. Chest. 111 (4): 970–80. PMID 9106577.
  10. Porcel JM, Peña JM, Vicente de Vera C, Esquerda A, Vives M, Light RW (2006). “Bayesian analysis using continuous likelihood ratios for identifying pleural exudates”. Respir Med. 100 (11): 1960–5. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2006.02.025. PMID 16626953.

Template:WH Template:WS

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

The incidence of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection surgery varies from 5% to 26%. The overall mortality risk due to pancreatic fistula is 1%, however patients with grade C pancreatic fistula carries a mortality risk of 25%.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

Mortality rate

References

  1. Reddymasu SC, Pakseresht K, Moloney B, Alsop B, Oropezia-Vail M, Olyaee M (2013). “Incidence of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy and efficacy of endoscopic therapy for its management: results from a tertiary care center”. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 7 (2): 332–9. doi:10.1159/000354136. PMC 3764947. PMID 24019766.
  2. Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A (2018). “Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts”. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 11: 105–118. doi:10.2147/CEG.S120217. PMC 5858541. PMID 29588609.
  3. Hackert T, Werner J, Büchler MW (2011). “Postoperative pancreatic fistula”. Surgeon. 9 (4): 211–7. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2010.10.011. PMID 21672661.
  4. Larsen M, Kozarek R (2014). “Management of pancreatic ductal leaks and fistulae”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 29 (7): 1360–70. doi:10.1111/jgh.12574. PMID 24650171.

Template:WH Template:WS

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

According to Fistula Risk Scoring (FRS) system, the risk factors for the development of pancreatic fistula depends upon the texture of the gland, underlying pathology, diameter of the pancreatic duct, underlying carcinoma involving the pancreatic duct, intraoperative blood loss and other risk factors such as male gender, obesity, malnutrition, increase gland remnant volume, fasting blood glucose level <108 mg/dl and excessive fluid administration during surgery.

Risk Factors

Common Risk Factors

According to Fistula Risk Scoring (FRS) system, the risk factors for the development of pancreatic fistula depends upon:

Less Common Risk Factors

References

  1. Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A (2018). “Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts”. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 11: 105–118. doi:10.2147/CEG.S120217. PMC 5858541. PMID 29588609.
  2. Ke Z, Cui J, Hu N, Yang Z, Chen H, Hu J; et al. (2018). “Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 170 consecutive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy based on the updated ISGPS classification and grading system”. Medicine (Baltimore). 97 (35): e12151. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000012151. PMC 6392812. PMID 30170457.
  3. Martin AN, Narayanan S, Turrentine FE, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Zaydfudim VM (2018). “Pancreatic duct size and gland texture are associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy but not after distal pancreatectomy”. PLoS One. 13 (9): e0203841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203841. PMC 6136772. PMID 30212577.

Template:WH Template:WS

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Clinical presentation may range from being asymptomatic to showing a variety of signs and symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, infection, tachycardia, pain, weight loss, ileus and severe symptoms such as unrelenting pain and sepsis. Complications following a pancreatic fistula may include Wound infection and sepsis, Hemorrhage, Internal and/or external fistula, Pancreatic pseudocyst, Delayed gastric emptying, Walled off pancreatic necrosis, Prolongation of the hospital stay, Pancreatic ascites, High amylase pleural effusion, Disconnected duct syndrome, Multisystem involvement eventually leading to multiorgan failure and/or death. Pancreatic fistula that are less severe are reported to heal in a duration of 4-6 weeks with conservative management only. Surgical intervention provides resolution of the fistula with a 90-92% success rate.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural History

History and clinical presentation depends upon the size, location and connection of the pancreatic fistula with the involved organ or cavity.[1][2]

Clinical presentation may range from being asymptomatic to showing a variety of signs and symptoms resulting from fluid accumulation such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, infection, tachycardia, pain, weight loss, ileus and severe symptoms such as unrelenting pain and sepsis.

Complications

  1. Wound infection and sepsis
  2. Hemorrhage
  3. Internal and/or external fistula
  4. Pancreatic pseudocyst
  5. Delayed gastric emptying
  6. Walled off pancreatic necrosis
  7. Prolongation of the hospital stay
  8. Pancreatic ascites
  9. High amylase pleural effusion
  10. Disconnected duct syndrome
  11. Multisystem involvement eventually leading to multiorgan failure and/or death.

Prognosis

  • Pancreatic fistula that are less severe are reported to heal in a duration of 4-6 weeks with conservative management only.
  • 80% of the external fistula and 50-65% of the internal fistula are reported to close eventually with conservative measures which involve stabilization of the patient with supportive therapies. However, pancreatic fistula can lead to significant morbidity if not addressed on time.
  • Surgical intervention provides resolution of the fistula with a 90-92% success rate.[10][11]

References

  1. Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM (2009). “The latent presentation of pancreatic fistulas”. Br J Surg. 96 (6): 641–9. doi:10.1002/bjs.6614. PMID 19434658.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Fulcher AS, Capps GW, Turner MA (1999). “Thoracopancreatic fistula: clinical and imaging findings”. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 23 (2): 181–7. doi:10.1097/00004728-199903000-00004. PMID 10096323.
  3. Schoch A, Rivory J, Monneuse O, Nargues N, Ponchon T, Pioche M (2020). “EUS-guided detection and internal drainage of an open pancreaticocutaneous fistula after acute necrotizing pancreatitis”. Endoscopy. 52 (8): E284–E285. doi:10.1055/a-1099-8998. PMID 32052403 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. Cameron JL, Kieffer RS, Anderson WJ, Zuidema GD (1976). “Internal pancreatic fistulas: pancreatic ascites and pleural effusions”. Ann Surg. 184 (5): 587–93. PMID 984927.
  5. Cameron JL, Kieffer RS, Anderson WJ, Zuidema GD (1976). “Internal pancreatic fistulas: pancreatic ascites and pleural effusions”. Ann Surg. 184 (5): 587–93. doi:10.1097/00000658-197611000-00009. PMC 1345487. PMID 984927.
  6. Iacono C, Procacci C, Frigo F, Andreis IA, Cesaro G, Caia S; et al. (1989). “Thoracic complications of pancreatitis”. Pancreas. 4 (2): 228–36. doi:10.1097/00006676-198904000-00012. PMID 2755944.
  7. SMITH EB (1953). “Hemorrhagic ascites and hemothorax associated with benign pancreatic disease”. AMA Arch Surg. 67 (1): 52–6. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1953.01260040055008. PMID 13064942.
  8. Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A (2018). “Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts”. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 11: 105–118. doi:10.2147/CEG.S120217. PMC 5858541. PMID 29588609.
  9. Larsen M, Kozarek R (2014). “Management of pancreatic ductal leaks and fistulae”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 29 (7): 1360–70. doi:10.1111/jgh.12574. PMID 24650171.
  10. Reddymasu SC, Pakseresht K, Moloney B, Alsop B, Oropezia-Vail M, Olyaee M (2013). “Incidence of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy and efficacy of endoscopic therapy for its management: results from a tertiary care center”. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 7 (2): 332–9. doi:10.1159/000354136. PMC 3764947. PMID 24019766.
  11. Alexakis N, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP (2004). “Surgical treatment of pancreatic fistula”. Dig Surg. 21 (4): 262–74. doi:10.1159/000080199. PMID 15308865.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and clinical presentation:

Imaging:

Laboratory tests:

Treatment

Treatment

References

References

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH