Developer site: The content shown here is test data.

Health Dictionary AI Health Chat Find an Online Doctor
A serene Zen garden with raked sand and smooth stones, symbolising clarity and calm

Health Dictionary

Back to skin conditions

Acute gastritis

Introduction

For patient information click here

Overview

Overview

Gastritis is a histologic diagnosis of inflammation of the gastric mucosa, defined by a significant inflammatory infiltrate. It is distinct from gastropathy, in which epithelial injury occurs with little or no inflammation, as in chemical (reactive) injury from NSAIDs or bile. The term “gastritis” was first used in 1728 by the German physician Georg Ernst Stahl. The discovery of Helicobacter pylori by Robin Warren and Barry Marshall in 1982 led to the modern understanding and classification of the gastritides. The Sydney System was introduced in 1990 and updated at the 1994 Houston workshop. The OLGA (Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment) staging system followed in 2005.

Chronic gastritis is classified along three complementary axes. The updated Sydney System provides the histologic classification by topography, morphology, and etiology. OLGA/OLGIM staging converts the severity and topography of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia into stages 0–IV of gastric cancer risk. Endoscopic classifications (Kyoto score, Kimura–Takemoto, and EGGIM) predict H. pylori status and cancer risk in real time and guide, but do not replace, biopsy sampling. Among the atrophic forms, H. pylori–associated gastritis is antral-predominant or multifocal, whereas autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is corpus-restricted.

Most clinically important gastritis arises from three mechanisms: H. pylori infection, the leading cause worldwide and the main driver of the inflammation-to-cancer sequence; AIG, a T cell–mediated destruction of corpus parietal cells; and reactive (chemical) gastropathy from NSAIDs, aspirin, bile reflux, and alcohol. Clinical outcome depends mainly on where inflammation sits in the stomach and how it alters gastric acid secretion. Chronic inflammation involving the corpus drives the Correa cascade of atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma. Less common causes include lymphocytic, eosinophilic, granulomatous, and collagenous gastritis; non–H. pylori infections, mainly in immunocompromised hosts; and radiation, caustic, and ischemic injury. Gastritis must be differentiated from peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastroenteritis, Crohn’s disease, gastrinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, and primary gastric lymphoma.

The epidemiology of gastritis is best described by etiologic subtype. Global adult H. pylori prevalence fell from 52.6% before 1990 to 43.9% in 2015–2022, but prevalence in children and adolescents (~35%) has not declined. In the United States, H. pylori positivity is falling overall but remains disproportionately high in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic individuals. Chronic atrophic gastritis affects ~5% of people in low–gastric-cancer-incidence populations and up to ~50% in high-incidence populations. AIG has a pooled global prevalence of ~3.9%, with a female predominance and overlap with other autoimmune diseases. Eosinophilic gastritis is rare, at ~6.3 per 100,000 in the US. The dominant risk factors are chronic H. pylori infection and autoimmunity. NSAIDs, aspirin, critical illness, bile reflux, and heavy alcohol use mainly cause reactive or erosive gastropathy. Cigarette smoking, a high-salt diet, increasing age, male sex, and a family history of gastric cancer act as cofactors for progression toward atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and cancer. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for gastritis.

Gastritis usually persists throughout life, and spontaneous remission is rare. Complications include peptic ulcers, gastrointestinal bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation, gastric polyps, anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, pernicious anemia, gastric outlet obstruction, and stomach cancer. Prognosis depends on the type and cause of gastritis. Reactive gastritis improves once offending agents are removed. AIG carries an increased risk of carcinoid tumors and gastric adenocarcinoma. Untreated H. pylori–associated gastritis may progress to peptic ulcer disease, adenocarcinoma, and MALT lymphoma.

Most patients with gastritis are asymptomatic, and dyspeptic symptoms correlate poorly with histologic findings. When present, symptoms include epigastric pain, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, bloating, early satiety, and, with bleeding, hematemesis or melena. Physical examination is often normal but may show pallor, epigastric tenderness, or tachycardia with bleeding. H. pylori can be detected by endoscopic biopsy-based tests (histology, rapid urease testing, culture, and PCR) or by nonendoscopic tests (urea breath test, fecal antigen test, and serology). CT may show gastric wall edema or a halo sign, and an upper gastrointestinal series may help exclude ulcers.

Treatment is directed by etiology. Offending agents such as NSAIDs and alcohol should be discontinued, and proton pump inhibitors should be prescribed only for a valid indication and deprescribed promptly. For H. pylori gastritis, the 2024 American College of Gastroenterology guideline and the 2022 Maastricht VI/Florence consensus recommend optimized bismuth quadruple therapy as the preferred empiric first-line regimen. Vonoprazan-based and rifabutin-based regimens are alternatives, and clarithromycin-based triple therapy is no longer recommended empirically. All regimens are given for 14 days, followed by a test of cure. AIG requires lifelong vitamin B12 and iron replacement with endoscopic surveillance. Other subtypes have specific therapies, such as dietary elimination and corticosteroids for eosinophilic gastritis and IV ganciclovir for CMV gastritis. Surgery is reserved for rare, life-threatening complications, including phlegmonous gastritis, emphysematous gastritis with necrosis, refractory postgastrectomy bile reflux gastritis, and uncontrolled stress-related hemorrhage. Prevention focuses on avoiding NSAIDs, alcohol, and smoking, on good hygiene to limit H. pylori transmission, and on confirming eradication after treatment.

Historical Perspective

In 1728, a German physician named Georg Ernst Stahl first used the term “gastritis” to describe inflammation of the inner lining of the stomach. In 1982, Robin Warren and Barry Marshall discovered Helicobacter pylori which further led to the identification and classification of different gastritides. in 1990, A New Classification of Gastritis called the Sydney System was presented to the World Congress of Gastroenterology in Sydney and was later published as six papers in the Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. In 1994, at the international workshop on the histopathology of gastritis held at Houston, The updated Sydney System for the classification and grading of gastritis was introduced. In 2005, gastritis staging using the OLGA (Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment) staging system for reporting gastric histology was introduced.

Classification

Chronic gastritis is classified along three complementary axes, each answering a different clinical question. The updated Sydney System gives the histologic classification: topography (antrum/incisura vs corpus), morphology (atrophic vs non-atrophic, metaplastic vs non-metaplastic, active vs inactive), and etiology.[1][2] Histologic staging with OLGA/OLGIM, and the newer OLGIMA, converts the severity and topography of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia (IM) into stages 0–IV of gastric cancer (GC) risk.[3][4] Endoscopic classification (Kyoto score, Kimura–Takemoto, and EGGIM) predicts Helicobacter pylori status and GC risk in real time and is now endorsed to guide, but not replace, biopsy sampling.[5][6]

Among the atrophic forms, the key distinction is between H. pylori–associated gastritis, which is antral-predominant or multifocal, and autoimmune gastritis, which is corpus-restricted.[7] Gastritis is a histologic diagnosis. Most patients are asymptomatic, and dyspeptic symptoms correlate poorly with histologic findings.[8]

Pathophysiology

Most clinically important gastritis arises from three mechanisms: Helicobacter pylori–associated gastritis, autoimmune gastritis (AIG), and reactive (chemical) gastropathy. H. pylori is the most common cause worldwide and the main driver of the inflammation-to-cancer sequence. AIG is T cell–mediated destruction of corpus parietal cells, producing atrophy confined to the corpus. Reactive gastropathy is non-immune epithelial injury from NSAIDs, bile reflux, and alcohol, usually with little true inflammation. Clinical outcome depends mainly on where the inflammation sits in the stomach and how it changes gastric acid secretion, not simply on whether the organism is present.[9] Chronic inflammation involving the corpus drives the Correa cascade: atrophy, then intestinal metaplasia, then dysplasia, then intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma. Histologic staging of this cascade with OLGA/OLGIM identifies patients at high cancer risk.[10][11]

Causes

Gastritis is gastric mucosal injury accompanied by a significant inflammatory infiltrate. Gastropathy is epithelial or mucosal injury with little or no inflammation, as seen in chemical (reactive) injury from NSAIDs or bile.[8] Current classification is based on cause, as set out in the Kyoto Global Consensus and the Real-World Gastritis Initiative (RE.GA.IN.).[12][13]

  • Helicobacter pylori infection is the leading cause of chronic gastritis worldwide.
  • Autoimmune gastritis is the main non-infectious cause of corpus-restricted atrophic gastritis.
  • Reactive (chemical) gastropathy from NSAIDs, aspirin, or bile reflux is the most frequent diagnosis where H. pylori is uncommon.

Less common causes include:

  • Lymphocytic, eosinophilic, granulomatous, and collagenous gastritis
  • Non–H. pylori infections, mainly in immunocompromised hosts
  • Radiation, caustic, and ischemic injury

Differentiating Gastritis overview from Other Diseases

Gastritis must be differentiated from peptic ulcer disease, gastric cancer, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastroenteritis, crohn’s disease, gastrinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma and primary gastric lymphoma.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The epidemiology of gastritis is best described by etiologic subtype rather than by the older acute vs chronic division, which does not track with cause, demographics, or cancer risk. Helicobacter pylori–associated gastritis is the dominant entity worldwide. Nearly all chronically infected individuals have histologic chronic active gastritis.[14] Global adult H. pylori prevalence fell from 52.6% before 1990 to 43.9% in 2015–2022, but prevalence in children and adolescents (~35%) has not declined in any WHO region.[15] In the United States, H. pylori positivity is falling overall, but it remains disproportionately high in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic individuals, and the racial gap has widened.[16]

Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is the shared pre-neoplastic phenotype of long-standing H. pylori infection and autoimmune gastritis (AIG). Its prevalence ranges from ~5% in low–gastric-cancer-incidence populations to ~50% in high-incidence populations.[7] AIG has a pooled global prevalence of ~3.9%, with a female predominance and strong overlap with other autoimmune diseases.[17] Eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) is rare, at ~6.3 per 100,000 in the US. It is more common in females and young children and is frequently underdiagnosed.[18]

Risk Factors

Gastritis is best stratified by etiology rather than by symptom-based lists, because etiology determines cancer risk, surveillance, and treatment.[13] The two dominant, clinically decisive risk factors are chronic Helicobacter pylori infection and autoimmunity.[7] NSAIDs and aspirin, critical illness, bile reflux, and heavy alcohol use mainly produce reactive (chemical) or erosive gastropathy, an epithelial injury pattern with minimal inflammation.[19][8] Cigarette smoking, high-salt diet, increasing age, male sex, and family history of gastric cancer act mainly as cofactors that promote progression of chronic gastritis toward atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and cancer.[20][21]

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for gastritis.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural History

Gastritis is a common inflammatory disease. Gastritis usually persists throughout life and the chance of spontaneous remission is rare. Gastritis is most commonly associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. The gastric mucosa undergoes inflammatory changes which may finally lead to atrophic gastritis. Chronic gastritis is commonly observed as a manifestation of progression of many gastric conditions. Gastric secretory functions are usually impaired due to inflammation and atrophy of the gastric mucosa. Increase in the prevalence of gastritis is attributed to the increasing age and the onset varies among different ethnicities. The increased risk of developing duodenal and peptic ulcers have been observed in individuals with persistent gastritis. Biopsies and routine evaluations may help predict the progression of gastritis to the conditions such as the peptic ulcer disease.

Complications

Complications of gastritis may include, peptic ulcers, gastrointestinal perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric polyp, anemia due to erosive gastritis, vitamin B12 deficiency, pernicious anemia, gastric outlet obstruction, increased risk of developing benign or malignant growths in the lining of the stomach which may lead to stomach cancer.

Prognosis

Prognosis for gastritis is majorly dependent upon the type of gastritis and etiological factors. In acute gastritis, the condition improves upon refraining from risk factors such as NSAIDs, alcohol, cigarette smoking, acidic food, and beverages. In autoimmune gastritis, prognosis for vitamin B12 deficiency when treated with cyanocobalamin therapy is good. Although in autoimmune gastritis, there is an increased risk for carcinoid tumors and gastric adenocarcinoma. In chronic gastritis associated with Helicobacter pylori infection, the prognosis is good. The triple therapy regimen may not be as effective when compared to quadruple bismuth-based regimen which has proven to be very effective comparatively. Helicobacter pylori infection associated chronic gastritis, if left untreated may progress to develop peptic ulcer disease, adenocarcinoma and MALT lymphoma.

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

It is important to reviews a patient’s history regarding medications, alcohol intake, smoking, and other risk factors that may be associated with gastritis.. Symptoms of gastritis may be silent or manifest as abdominal discomfort, nausea, vomiting, and/or gastrointestinal bleeding. Individuals with gastritis experience abdominal pain and gastric disturbances. Symptoms as a result of gastritis are upper abdominal pain or discomfort, dyspepsia (indigestion), nausea, vomiting of blood or dark brown/coffee-ground like vomitus, bloating sensation in the upper abdomen, belching, heartburn, loss of appetite, malena (dark stools), gastric hemorrhage, fever, lethargy, halitosis, epigastric pain or abdominal pain, early satiety, fatigue and diarrhea.

Physical Examination

Patients with gastritis may appear pale. Some patients may appear fatigued and in distress if associated with abdominal pain. Vital signs generally appear to be normal. If associated with gastrointestinal bleed, vital signs include tachycardia. Pallor may observed in patients presenting with melena and hematemesis. On examination of the eyes, conjunctival pallor may be observed. Halitosis may be observed in case of chronic gastritis. Chest tenderness may be present on palpation in case of Helicobacter pylori infection associated gastritis. Abdominal pain or discomfort may be observed. Epigastric tenderness may be present. Gastritis associated with gastric ulcers may result in blood loss and the stool test may be guaiac-positive.

Diagnostic Tests

Endoscopic diagnostic tests are biopsy-based diagnostic methods for gastritis associated with H. pylori infection. These include histology, rapid urease testing, culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

The nonendoscopic diagnostic testing methods for gastritis associated with H. pylori include antibody tests, urea breath test, and fecal antigen test.

Imaging Findings

CT scan

CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of gastritis. Findings on CT scan suggestive of gastritis include gastric wall edema and halo sign.

X- ray

An x-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of gastritis. Series of x-rays of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum known as the upper gastrointestinal series or barium swallow aid in determining the condition. In barium swallow procedure, the patient is made to ingest a white liquid which contains barium. The ingested barium liquid lines the gastrointestinal tract and helps in visualizing the ulcers better when the x-ray is taken.

Other Diagnostic Studies

In Helicobacter pylori infection which is the most common cause of gastritis, a non-invasive test such as the urea breath test is used to determine the presence of H. pylori in the stomach.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Gastritis encompasses a heterogeneous group of conditions, and treatment is directed by the underlying etiology. Offending agents (particularly NSAIDs and alcohol) should be discontinued. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) form the backbone of acid suppression across most subtypes but should be prescribed only when a valid indication exists and deprescribed promptly thereafter.

For Helicobacter pylori gastritis — the most common form worldwide — the 2024 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) guideline and the 2022 Maastricht VI/Florence Consensus Report establish optimized bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) as the preferred empiric first-line regimen, replacing clarithromycin-based triple therapy which is no longer recommended empirically due to rising global resistance rates. Vonoprazan-based dual or triple therapy and rifabutin-based triple therapy are recognized alternative first-line regimens. All eradication regimens must be given for 14 days, followed by mandatory test of cure.[14][22]

For other subtypes: autoimmune gastritis requires lifelong parenteral vitamin B12 and iron replacement, with endoscopic surveillance for gastric cancer and neuroendocrine tumors; NSAID-associated gastropathy is managed with risk-stratified PPI co-therapy or COX-2 selective inhibitors; stress-related mucosal disease in the ICU is treated with PPI or H2RA while qualifying risk factors persist, then discontinued at ICU discharge per the 2024 SCCM/ASHP guideline; eosinophilic gastritis is treated with dietary elimination and corticosteroids, with dupilumab as an emerging option; CMV gastritis requires IV ganciclovir in immunocompromised hosts; and bile reflux gastropathy is managed with ursodeoxycholic acid and sucralfate. Rational PPI deprescribing and gastroprotection in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy must also be kept in consideration.

Surgery

Surgery is reserved for rare, life-threatening complications of gastritis that have failed or are not amenable to medical management. The principal surgical indications are: (1) phlegmonous gastritis with refractory sepsis, gastric gangrene, or perforation; (2) emphysematous gastritis with gastric ischemia or necrosis confirmed on imaging or endoscopy; (3) symptomatic postgastrectomy bile reflux gastritis refractory to maximal medical therapy; and (4) upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from stress-related mucosal disease that is not controlled by endoscopic or interventional radiologic means. Understanding the specific surgical indications, procedural options, and postoperative considerations is essential for optimal patient outcomes in these uncommon but critically ill presentations.

Primary Prevention

Effective measures for the primary prevention of gastritis include avoiding long term or extended use of medications such as NSAIDs, abstenance from alcohol, cessation of cigarette smoking, coffee or acidic beverages, spicy foods and avoiding stress. Inculcating healthy eating habits, exercising regularly and maintaining healthy body weight may help in avoiding gastritis. Effective measures for primary prevention of the H. pylori infection include hand washing (antibacterial soaps), avoid contaminated food and water, maintain proper hygiene (hand sanitizers, antiseptic washes) and avoid close contact with infected family members ( e.g., kissing, by sharing eating utensils and drinking glasses).

Secondary Prevention

The secondary prevention strategies for gastritis following H. pylori infection to prevent recurrence of peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer include the use of antibiotics to prevent recurrence of infection and the post treatment confirmation of H. pylori eradication after treatment using diagnostic tests.

References

  1. ↑ Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P (1996). “Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994”. Am J Surg Pathol. 20 (10): 1161–81. PMID 8827022.
  2. ↑ Rugge M, Savarino E, Sbaraglia M, Bricca L, Malfertheiner P (2021). “Gastritis: the clinico-pathological spectrum”. Dig Liver Dis. 53 (10): 1237–1246. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2021.03.007. PMID 33785282 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. ↑ Rugge M, Meggio A, Pennelli G, Piscioli F, Giacomelli L, De Pretis G; et al. (2007). “Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system”. Gut. 56 (5): 631–6. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.106666. PMC 1942143. PMID 17142647.
  4. ↑ Gawron AJ, Shah SC, Altayar O, Davitkov P, Morgan D, Turner K, Mustafa RA (2020). “AGA technical review on gastric intestinal metaplasia—natural history and clinical outcomes”. Gastroenterology. 158 (3): 705–731.e5. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.001. PMID 31816300.
  5. ↑ Toyoshima O, Nishizawa T (2022). “Kyoto classification of gastritis: advances and future perspectives in endoscopic diagnosis of gastritis”. World J Gastroenterol. 28 (43): 6078–6089. doi:10.3748/wjg.v28.i43.6078. PMID 36483157 Check |pmid= value (help).
  6. ↑ Dinis-Ribeiro M, Libânio D, Uchima H; et al. (2025). “Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) and European Society of Pathology (ESP) guideline update 2025”. Endoscopy. 57 (5): 504–554. doi:10.1055/a-2529-5025. PMID 40112834 Check |pmid= value (help).
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Shah SC, Piazuelo MB, Kuipers EJ, Li D (2021). “AGA clinical practice update on the diagnosis and management of atrophic gastritis: expert review”. Gastroenterology. 161 (4): 1325–1332.e7. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.078. PMID 34454714 Check |pmid= value (help).
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Washington MK, Peek RM (2022). “Gastritis and gastropathy”. Yamada’s Textbook of Gastroenterology (7th ed.).
  9. ↑ Malfertheiner P, Camargo MC, El-Omar E; et al. (2023). “Helicobacter pylori infection”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 9 (1): 19. doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00431-8. PMID 37081005 Check |pmid= value (help).
  10. ↑ Sundar R, Nakayama I, Markar SR, Shitara K, van Laarhoven HWM; et al. (2025). “Gastric cancer”. Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00052-2.
  11. ↑ Rugge M, Sugano K, Scarpignato C; et al. (2019). “Gastric cancer prevention targeted on risk assessment: Gastritis OLGA staging”. Helicobacter. 24 (2): e12571. doi:10.1111/hel.12571. PMID 30773732.
  12. ↑ Sugano K, Tack J, Kuipers EJ; et al. (2015). “Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis”. Gut. 64 (9): 1353–67. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309252. PMID 26187502.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Rugge M, Genta RM, Malfertheiner P; et al. (2024). “RE.GA.IN.: the Real-world Gastritis Initiative—updating the updates”. Gut. 73 (3): 407–441. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331164. PMID 38383142 Check |pmid= value (help).
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Chey WD, Howden CW, Moss SF, Morgan DR, Greer KB, Grover S, Shah SC (2024). “ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection”. Am J Gastroenterol. 119 (9): 1730–1753. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002968. PMID 39626064 Check |pmid= value (help).
  15. ↑ Chen YC, Malfertheiner P, Yu HT, Kuo CL, Chang YY, Meng FT, Wu YX, Hsiao JL, Chen MJ, Lin KP, Wu CY, Lin JT, O’Morain C, Megraud F, Lee WC, El-Omar EM, Wu MS, Liou JM (2024). “Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and incidence of gastric cancer between 1980 and 2022”. Gastroenterology. 166 (4): 605–619. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.12.022. PMID 38176660 Check |pmid= value (help).
  16. ↑ Shah SC, Halvorson AE, Lee D, Bustamante R, McBay B, Gupta R, Denton J, Dorn C, Wilson O, Peek R Jr, Gupta S, Liu L, Hung A, Greevy R, Roumie CL (2024). “Helicobacter pylori burden in the United States according to individual demographics and geography: a nationwide analysis of the Veterans Healthcare System”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.016. PMID 37245717 Check |pmid= value (help).
  17. ↑ Li M, Huang Y, Liang X, Lu H. Prevalence of autoimmune gastritis worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Helicobacter. 2025.
  18. ↑ Jensen ET, Martin CF, Kappelman MD, Dellon ES (2016). “Prevalence of eosinophilic gastritis, gastroenteritis, and colitis: estimates from a national administrative database”. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 62 (1): 36–42. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000000865. PMC 4654708. PMID 25988554.
  19. ↑ Bjarnason I, Scarpignato C, Holmgren E, Olszewski M, Rainsford KD, Lanas A (2018). “Mechanisms of Damage to the Gastrointestinal Tract From Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs”. Gastroenterology. 154 (3): 500–514. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.049. PMID 29221664.
  20. ↑ Thrift AP, Wenker TN, El-Serag HB (2023). “Global burden of gastric cancer: epidemiological trends, risk factors, screening and prevention”. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 20: 338–349.
  21. ↑ Huang RJ, Balasubramanian V, Shum MV, Ji HP, Hwang JH. Incidence of non-cardia gastric cancer among commercially-insured individuals aged 18-64 with chronic atrophic gastritis. PLoS One. 2024.
  22. ↑ Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, Rokkas T, Gisbert JP, Liou JM, Schulz C, Gasbarrini A, Hunt RH, Leja M, O’Morain C, Rugge M, Suerbaum S, Tilg H, Sugano K, El-Omar EM (2022). “Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report”. Gut. 71 (9): 1724–1762. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327745. PMID 35944890 Check |pmid= value (help).

​​

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahad Hasan, M.D.[2] Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3]

Historical Perspective

Overview

In 1728, Georg Ernst Stahl, a German physician first used the term “gastritis” to describe inflammation of the inner lining of the stomach. In 1982, Robin Warren and Barry Marshall discovered Helicobacter pylori which further led to the identification and classification of different gastritides. In 1990, a new classification of gastritis called the Sydney system was presented to the World Congress of gastroenterology in Sydney and was later published as six papers in the Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. In 1994, the updated Sydney System for the classification and grading of gastritis was introduced at the International Workshop on the histopathology of gastritis held at Houston. In 2005, gastritis staging using the OLGA (Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment) staging system for reporting gastric histology was introduced.

Historical Perspective

  • In 1728, George Stahl first noted inflammation of the inner lining of the stomach as “gastritis”.
  • In 1771, Giovanni Morgagni described “erosive” and “ulcerating gastritis”.
  • In 1855, Baron Carl von Rokitansky described “hypertrophic gastritis”.
  • In 1870, Samuel Fenwick described gastric atrophy.
  • In 1944, Warren & Meissner described intestinal metaplasia as feature of chronic gastritis.
  • In 1947, Sir Ian Jeffreys Wood, performed first gastric biopsy with semi-flexible biopsy tube and defined “gastritis” by histopathology.
  • In 1956, Louis Streifeneder and Eddy Palmer introduced flexible fiber optic endoscope.
  • In 1982, Robin Warren and Barry Marshall discovered Helicobacter pylori which further led to the identification and classification of different gastritides.[1]
  • In 1990, a new classification of gastritis called the Sydney system was presented to the World Congress of gastroenterology in Sydney and was later published as six papers in the Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.[2][3]
  • In 1994, the updated Sydney system for the classification and grading of gastritis was introduced at the international workshop on the histopathology of gastritis held at Houston.[3]
  • In 2005, gastritis staging using the OLGA (Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment) staging system for reporting gastric histology was introduced. Gastritis staging combines the atrophy score which is determined by biopsy and the atrophy topography which is determined by directed biopsy mapping.[4][5]

References

  1. ↑ Hellstrom PM (2006). “This year’s Nobel Prize to gastroenterology: Robin Warren and Barry Marshall awarded for their discovery of Helicobacter pylori as pathogen in the gastrointestinal tract”. World J Gastroenterol. 12 (19): 3126–7. PMC 4124396. PMID 16718802.
  2. ↑ Sipponen P, Price AB (2011). “The Sydney System for classification of gastritis 20 years ago”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 26 Suppl 1: 31–4. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06536.x. PMID 21199511.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Stolte M, Meining A (2001). “The updated Sydney system: classification and grading of gastritis as the basis of diagnosis and treatment”. Can J Gastroenterol. 15 (9): 591–8. PMID 11573102.
  4. ↑ Rugge M, Meggio A, Pennelli G, Piscioli F, Giacomelli L, De Pretis G; et al. (2007). “Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system”. Gut. 56 (5): 631–6. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.106666. PMC 1942143. PMID 17142647.
  5. ↑ Rugge M, Correa P, Di Mario F, El-Omar E, Fiocca R, Geboes K; et al. (2008). “OLGA staging for gastritis: a tutorial”. Dig Liver Dis. 40 (8): 650–8. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2008.02.030. PMID 18424244.

​​

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[2]

Classification

Overview

Chronic gastritis is classified along three complementary axes, each answering a different clinical question. The updated Sydney System gives the histologic classification: topography (antrum/incisura vs corpus), morphology (atrophic vs non-atrophic, metaplastic vs non-metaplastic, active vs inactive), and etiology.[1][2] Histologic staging with OLGA/OLGIM, and the newer OLGIMA, converts the severity and topography of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia (IM) into stages 0–IV of gastric cancer (GC) risk.[3][4] Endoscopic classification (Kyoto score, Kimura–Takemoto, and EGGIM) predicts Helicobacter pylori status and GC risk in real time and is now endorsed to guide, but not replace, biopsy sampling.[5][6]

Among the atrophic forms, the key distinction is between H. pylori–associated gastritis, which is antral-predominant or multifocal, and autoimmune gastritis, which is corpus-restricted.[7] Gastritis is a histologic diagnosis. Most patients are asymptomatic, and dyspeptic symptoms correlate poorly with histologic findings.[8]

Classification

Updated Sydney System

The updated Sydney System (Houston workshop, 1994; published 1996) is the international standard for classifying and reporting non-neoplastic gastric biopsies. It classifies chronic gastritis by topography, morphology, and etiology, and provides a visual analogue scale for semiquantitative grading.[1]

Graded morphologic variables

Each variable is graded 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (marked).[1]

Updated Sydney System: graded variables
Feature Definition Grading anchor
Chronic inflammation Lymphocytes and plasma cells in the lamina propria Mild, moderate, or marked increase in density
Activity Neutrophilic infiltration of pits and surface epithelium Mild: <⅓ of pits/surface
Moderate: ⅓–⅔
Marked: >⅔
Atrophy Loss of glands appropriate to the compartment (antral or oxyntic), including metaplastic atrophy Mild, moderate, or marked loss
Intestinal metaplasia Intestinal-type epithelium replacing gastric epithelium Mild: <⅓ of mucosa
Moderate: ⅓–⅔
Marked: >⅔
H. pylori density Organism load on the surface epithelium Mild: scattered organisms over <⅓ of surface
Moderate: intermediate
Marked: large clusters or a continuous layer over >⅔ of surface

Non-graded features are recorded as present or absent. They include surface epithelial damage, lymphoid follicles, foveolar hyperplasia, and granulomas.[8]

Etiologic and topographic categories

Chronic gastritis categories (updated Sydney System)
Category Principal etiology Synonyms / notes
Non-atrophic H. pylori (± other factors) Superficial gastritis, diffuse antral gastritis; historically “type B”
Atrophic: autoimmune Autoimmunity Historically “type A”; corpus-restricted; pernicious anemia–associated
Atrophic: multifocal H. pylori; dietary and environmental factors Historically “type B/AB”; environmental metaplastic atrophic gastritis
Chemical (reactive gastropathy) NSAIDs, bile reflux, other irritants Historically “type C”; reflux/chemical gastropathy (minimal inflammation)
Lymphocytic Celiac disease, H. pylori, drugs (e.g., ticlopidine), idiopathic Varioliform appearance at endoscopy
Granulomatous (non-infectious) Crohn’s disease, sarcoidosis, vasculitis, foreign material, idiopathic Isolated granulomatous gastritis when no cause is found
Eosinophilic Food sensitivity and other allergy —
Collagenous Unknown (possible autoimmune mechanism) Thickened subepithelial collagen band
Radiation Radiation injury —
Other infectious Non–H. pylori bacteria, cytomegalovirus, fungi, parasites (e.g., anisakiasis) Includes phlegmonous and emphysematous gastritis

[1][2]

  • The legacy “type A/B/C” labels predate the modern etiologic classification. They should be used only as historical synonyms, not as standalone diagnoses.[9]
  • “Gastritis” is reserved for inflammatory processes. NSAID- or bile-induced injury is histologically a gastropathy with minimal inflammation and is often misreported as gastritis.[8]

Biopsy sampling required for classification and staging

Topographic classification and staging require correctly sited biopsies submitted in separate, labeled containers.[7][10]

  • Antrum (2): lesser and greater curvature, within 2–3 cm of the pylorus
  • Incisura angularis (1): an early site of atrophy, IM, and dysplasia
  • Corpus (2): lesser curvature about 4 cm proximal to the incisura, and greater curvature about 8 cm distal to the cardia
  • Containers: at least one jar for antrum/incisura and one for corpus; targeted biopsies of visible lesions go in a separate jar
  • Corpus biopsies are especially important in patients taking proton pump inhibitors or potassium-competitive acid blockers, because H. pylori migrates proximally under acid suppression.[10]
  • MAPS III accepts a pragmatic minimum of 2 antrum/incisura and 2 corpus biopsies in 2 vials. The incisura biopsy is optional when virtual chromoendoscopy is used.[6]

Histologic staging: OLGA, OLGIM, and OLGIMA

Staging combines the severity of atrophy or IM with its topography to assign stage 0–IV. Stages III–IV denote high GC risk.[3][4][11] Clinical priority has shifted from naming the type of gastritis to staging its cancer risk.[12]

The matrix below is shared by OLGA (scoring atrophy) and OLGIM (scoring IM only). The antrum score includes the incisura angularis.[3]

OLGA / OLGIM staging matrix
Antrum (incl. incisura) ↓ Corpus →
None (0) Mild (1) Moderate (2) Severe (3)
None (0) Stage 0 Stage I Stage II Stage II
Mild (1) Stage I Stage I Stage II Stage III
Moderate (2) Stage II Stage II Stage III Stage IV
Severe (3) Stage III Stage III Stage IV Stage IV
Comparison of histologic staging systems
System What is scored Strengths Limitations
OLGA (Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment) Atrophy in the antrum/incisura and corpus. Atrophy includes non-metaplastic gland loss, pseudopyloric metaplasia, and IM. Biologically most complete Only moderate interobserver agreement for glandular atrophy
OLGIM (Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment) IM only, using the same matrix Higher interobserver agreement Ignores non-metaplastic atrophy and can under-stage. OLGIM stage is never higher than OLGA stage.
OLGIMA (Operative Link on Gastric IM and Glandular Atrophy Assessment; 2026) The most severe single finding (glandular atrophy or IM) in each compartment, rather than an average In multicenter validation it captured all OLGIM III–IV patients and up-staged OLGIM 0–II patients with advanced glandular atrophy New; not yet in routine use

[13][14]

  • A meta-analysis of prospective cohorts confirmed substantially higher GC risk for OLGA/OLGIM III–IV than for 0–II. It also found measurable excess risk for stage II compared with 0–I, which challenges a strict cutoff at stage III.[15]
  • The Correa histopathology score incorporates IM extent and complete versus incomplete subtype. It correlates with OLGA/OLGIM and is used mainly in cohort studies of progression.[4]
  • Guidelines differ on how to use stage clinically. MAPS III recommends endoscopic surveillance (every 3 years) for advanced stages (III–IV) or extensive atrophy/IM.[6] The AGA recommends against routine surveillance for IM in general (conditional recommendation, very-low-quality evidence) and favors shared decision-making in higher-risk subgroups.[16][13]

Endoscopic classification

High-definition endoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy allows real-time classification and risk stratification. It is endorsed to guide biopsy sampling, not to replace histology.[6]

Endoscopic classification systems
System Components Interpretation
Kyoto classification (Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society) Composite score of 0–8: atrophy (0–2), IM (0–2), enlarged folds (0–1), nodularity (0–1), diffuse redness (0–2) 0: normal (uninfected) stomach
≥2: H. pylori–infected gastritis
≥4: gastritis at elevated GC risk
Kimura–Takemoto Extent and pattern of endoscopic atrophy: closed type (C1–C3) or open type (O1–O3) C3 or open type indicates extensive atrophy and higher risk
EGGIM (Endoscopic Grading of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia) IM scored 0–2 in each of five areas (total 0–10) EGGIM ≥5 indicates extensive IM

[5][17][6]

  • Individual Kyoto findings indicate infection status. Regular arrangement of collecting venules (RAC) predicts an uninfected stomach. Enlarged folds, nodularity, and diffuse redness predict current infection. Map-like redness predicts past, eradicated infection.[5][17]
  • Endoscopic and histologic findings correlate but are not interchangeable. Kyoto atrophy and IM scores track Sydney atrophy and IM grades. Enlarged folds, nodularity, and diffuse redness correlate with corpus inflammation rather than atrophy.[18]
  • A Kyoto score of ≥4 should prompt Sydney-protocol biopsies to stage GC risk.[5]

Etiologic phenotypes of chronic atrophic gastritis

H. pylori–associated atrophic gastritis (HpAG) and autoimmune gastritis (AIG) are distinguished mainly by topography and serology.[9][7]

H. pylori–associated vs autoimmune atrophic gastritis
Feature H. pylori–associated (HpAG) Autoimmune (AIG)
Legacy label Type B Type A
Topography Antral-predominant or multifocal; extends proximally Corpus-restricted; antrum spared
Mechanism Chronic H. pylori infection Immune-mediated destruction of parietal cells
Serology / biomarkers H. pylori testing positive Anti-parietal cell antibodies ± anti-intrinsic factor antibodies; elevated gastrin; low pepsinogen I/II ratio
Acid secretion Variable Hypochlorhydria or achlorhydria
Key sequelae Peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, MALT lymphoma Pernicious anemia (vitamin B12 deficiency), iron deficiency, type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors
Demographics / associations Follows H. pylori prevalence More common in women; associated with autoimmune thyroid disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Antral atrophy alongside corpus-restricted atrophy should raise suspicion of concurrent HpAG and AIG. The two frequently coexist.[7][19]
  • Current AIG phenotyping goes beyond the classic dichotomy. It now includes potential AIG (anti-parietal cell antibody–positive, normal gastrin) and seronegative AIG (antibody-negative, elevated gastrin), both of which require histologic confirmation.[19]

Structured pathology reporting

Several report elements are the strongest determinants of risk category, so the pathology report should specify:[20][21]

  • H. pylori status
  • Severity (mild, moderate, or marked) of atrophy and IM in each compartment
  • IM subtype: incomplete IM carries higher GC risk than complete IM
  • Anatomic extent: limited (antrum/incisura only) vs extensive (corpus involvement), with extensive IM carrying higher risk
  • OLGA/OLGIM stage where feasible. Such staging remains uncommon in US practice.[7]

Classification pitfalls

  • Pooling biopsies from the antrum and corpus in one container prevents topographic classification and OLGA/OLGIM staging.[7]
  • Omitting the incisura misses a common early site of atrophy, IM, and dysplasia.[7]
  • Labeling reactive gastropathy as gastritis misdirects workup toward infection or autoimmunity.[8]
  • Assuming eradication resets the stage. Established atrophy and IM persist after H. pylori eradication, and the staged risk remains.[7]
  • Relying on serology alone for AIG misses potential and seronegative phenotypes.[19]
  • Expecting symptoms to reflect histology. Gastritis is usually asymptomatic.[8]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P (1996). “Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994”. Am J Surg Pathol. 20 (10): 1161–81. PMID 8827022.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Rugge M, Savarino E, Sbaraglia M, Bricca L, Malfertheiner P (2021). “Gastritis: the clinico-pathological spectrum”. Dig Liver Dis. 53 (10): 1237–1246. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2021.03.007. PMID 33785282 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Rugge M, Meggio A, Pennelli G, Piscioli F, Giacomelli L, De Pretis G; et al. (2007). “Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system”. Gut. 56 (5): 631–6. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.106666. PMC 1942143. PMID 17142647.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Gawron AJ, Shah SC, Altayar O, Davitkov P, Morgan D, Turner K, Mustafa RA (2020). “AGA technical review on gastric intestinal metaplasia—natural history and clinical outcomes”. Gastroenterology. 158 (3): 705–731.e5. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.001. PMID 31816300.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Toyoshima O, Nishizawa T (2022). “Kyoto classification of gastritis: advances and future perspectives in endoscopic diagnosis of gastritis”. World J Gastroenterol. 28 (43): 6078–6089. doi:10.3748/wjg.v28.i43.6078. PMID 36483157 Check |pmid= value (help).
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Dinis-Ribeiro M, Libânio D, Uchima H; et al. (2025). “Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) and European Society of Pathology (ESP) guideline update 2025”. Endoscopy. 57 (5): 504–554. doi:10.1055/a-2529-5025. PMID 40112834 Check |pmid= value (help).
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 Shah SC, Piazuelo MB, Kuipers EJ, Li D (2021). “AGA clinical practice update on the diagnosis and management of atrophic gastritis: expert review”. Gastroenterology. 161 (4): 1325–1332.e7. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.078. PMID 34454714 Check |pmid= value (help).
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Washington MK, Peek RM (2022). “Gastritis and gastropathy”. Yamada’s Textbook of Gastroenterology (7th ed.).
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Lenti MV, Rugge M, Lahner E, Miceli E, Toh BH, Genta RM, De Block C, Hershko C, Di Sabatino A (2020). “Autoimmune gastritis”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 6 (1): 56. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0187-8. PMID 32647173 Check |pmid= value (help).
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Nagula S, Parasa S, Laine L, Shah SC (2024). “AGA clinical practice update on high-quality upper endoscopy: expert review”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 22 (5): 933–943. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.034. PMID 38385942 Check |pmid= value (help).
  11. ↑ Rugge M, Correa P, Di Mario F, El-Omar E, Fiocca R, Geboes K; et al. (2008). “OLGA staging for gastritis: a tutorial”. Dig Liver Dis. 40 (8): 650–8. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2008.02.030. PMID 18424244.
  12. ↑ Rugge M, Genta RM, Malfertheiner P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, El-Serag H, Graham DY; et al. (2024). “RE.GA.IN.: the Real-world Gastritis Initiative—updating the updates”. Gut. 73 (3): 407–441. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331164. PMID 38383142 Check |pmid= value (help).
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Matysiak-Budnik T, Camargo MC, Piazuelo MB, Leja M (2020). “Recent guidelines on the management of patients with gastric atrophy: common points and controversies”. Dig Dis Sci. 65 (7): 1899–1903.
  14. ↑ Delgado Guillena PG, Cuatrecasas M, Montori S; et al. (2026). “The OLGIMA system for gastric cancer risk assessment. A useful method based on the histological Sydney consensus”. Histopathology. 88 (4): 911–921. PMID 41293900 Check |pmid= value (help).
  15. ↑ Benites-Goñi H, Cabrera-Hinojosa D, Latorre G, Hernandez AV, Uchima H, Riquelme A (2025). “OLGA and OLGIM staging systems on the risk assessment of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts”. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 18. doi:10.1177/17562848251325461.
  16. ↑ Gupta S, Li D, El Serag HB, Davitkov P, Altayar O, Sultan S, Falck-Ytter Y, Mustafa RA (2020). “AGA clinical practice guidelines on management of gastric intestinal metaplasia”. Gastroenterology. 158 (3): 693–702. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.003.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Toyoshima O, Nishizawa T, Koike K (2020). “Endoscopic Kyoto classification of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer risk diagnosis”. World J Gastroenterol. 26 (5). doi:10.3748/wjg.v26.i5.466. PMID 32089624 Check |pmid= value (help).
  18. ↑ Toyoshima O, Nishizawa T, Yoshida S; et al. (2022). “Consistency between the endoscopic Kyoto classification and pathological updated Sydney System for gastritis”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 37 (2). PMID 34569096 Check |pmid= value (help).
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Lenti MV, Miceli E, Vanoli A, Di Sabatino A (2026). “Autoimmune gastritis: emerging insights and clinical management”. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. doi:10.1038/s41575-026-01200-0. PMID 41975068 Check |pmid= value (help).
  20. ↑ Shah SC, Wang AY, Wallace MB, Hwang JH (2025). “AGA clinical practice update on screening and surveillance in individuals at increased risk for gastric cancer in the United States: expert review”. Gastroenterology. 168 (2): 405–416.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.001.
  21. ↑ Sugano K, Moss SF, Kuipers EJ (2023). “Gastric intestinal metaplasia: real culprit or innocent bystander as a precancerous condition for gastric cancer?”. Gastroenterology. 165 (6): 1352–1366.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.028.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahad Hasan, M.D.[2] Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3]

Pathophysiology

Overview

Most clinically important gastritis arises from three mechanisms: Helicobacter pylori–associated gastritis, autoimmune gastritis (AIG), and reactive (chemical) gastropathy. H. pylori is the most common cause worldwide and the main driver of the inflammation-to-cancer sequence. AIG is T cell–mediated destruction of corpus parietal cells, producing atrophy confined to the corpus. Reactive gastropathy is non-immune epithelial injury from NSAIDs, bile reflux, and alcohol, usually with little true inflammation. Clinical outcome depends mainly on where the inflammation sits in the stomach and how it changes gastric acid secretion, not simply on whether the organism is present.[1] Chronic inflammation involving the corpus drives the Correa cascade: atrophy, then intestinal metaplasia, then dysplasia, then intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma. Histologic staging of this cascade with OLGA/OLGIM identifies patients at high cancer risk.[2][3]

Pathophysiology

Helicobacter pylori–associated gastritis

Colonization and topographic phenotypes

  • H. pylori crosses the mucus layer using flagellar motility and local alkalinization generated by urease.
  • It then adheres to epithelial cells through adhesins (BabA, SabA, OipA) that bind Lewis blood-group antigens.[1]
  • Almost everyone with persistent colonization develops chronic gastritis. The topographic pattern determines the phenotype and its consequences:[4][1]
Topographic phenotypes of chronic H. pylori gastritis
Phenotype Approximate frequency Acid secretion Mechanism Clinical consequence
Mild non-atrophic pangastritis Most infected persons Normal Low-grade inflammation without atrophy Usually asymptomatic; no major sequelae
Antral-predominant gastritis ~10–15% Increased Corpus is relatively spared, so parietal-cell mass is preserved. Antral inflammation impairs inhibitory control by somatostatin-secreting D cells, raising gastrin and acid output. Duodenal ulcer phenotype
Corpus-predominant / multifocal atrophic gastritis ~1% Decreased (hypochlorhydria or achlorhydria) Inflammation of the oxyntic corpus leads to oxyntic atrophy. Low pepsinogen I and a low pepsinogen I/II ratio are physiologic markers. Gastric ulcer and gastric cancer phenotype
  • Acute infection causes transient hypochlorhydria, which helps the organism colonize.
  • Chronic infection then diverges into one of two patterns:[5][6]
    • the acid-hypersecretory antral pattern, or
    • the acid-hyposecretory corpus pattern, driven partly by IL-1β suppression of the parietal-cell proton pump.

Virulence factors

  • cag pathogenicity island and CagA
    • cag-positive strains assemble a type IV secretion system (T4SS) that injects CagA into epithelial cells.
    • Phosphorylated CagA activates SHP2–ERK signaling and also activates AKT and WNT signaling.
    • CagA inhibits PAR1b, which disrupts cell polarity and tight junctions. It also promotes genomic instability and epithelial–mesenchymal transition.
    • Downstream mutations can become self-sustaining. CagA can therefore act by a “hit-and-run” mechanism, in which malignant transformation no longer requires the organism.[7]
    • cag-positive strains cause more severe gastritis, atrophy, ulceration, and distal cancer.[7]
  • VacA
    • VacA is present in nearly all strains. Its pathogenicity depends on genotype; s1/i1/m1 alleles are the most virulent.
    • It forms membrane pores, induces vacuolation and apoptosis, supplies nutrients to the bacteria, and promotes immune evasion.[8][9]
  • ADP-heptose and peptidoglycan
    • These CagA-independent molecules are translocated through the T4SS.
    • They activate ALPK1–TIFA–NF-κB signaling, a major pathway for initial mucosal inflammation and IL-8–driven neutrophil recruitment.[7][1]

Immune response and chronicity

Autoimmune gastritis

  • AIG is a chronic, non–self-limiting, T cell–mediated disorder.
  • It is restricted to the oxyntic (corpus/fundus) mucosa and spares the antrum, the mirror image of antral-predominant H. pylori gastritis.[10]
  • Autoantigen
    • The target is the parietal-cell H⁺/K⁺-ATPase (the gastric proton pump).
    • Autoreactive CD4⁺ Th1 cells recognize the proton pump through MHC class II.
    • Parietal cells die by apoptosis through Fas–FasL and perforin–granzyme mechanisms.[11][10]
  • Autoantibodies
    • Anti-parietal cell antibodies (PCA) and intrinsic factor antibodies (IFA) are serologic hallmarks, but their accuracy is suboptimal.
    • PCA has a high false-positive rate, and IFA has low sensitivity.
    • Diagnosis therefore rests on histologic corpus-restricted atrophy together with endoscopy and serology, not on antibodies alone.[12][13]
  • Functional consequences
  • Natural history

Reactive (chemical) gastropathy

  • Reactive gastropathy is a non-immune injury pattern. It is now among the most common histologic gastric diagnoses, especially where H. pylori prevalence is low.[16]
  • Causes include:[17]
  • NSAIDs and aspirin
    • Cyclooxygenase inhibition depletes mucosal prostaglandins. This reduces mucus and bicarbonate secretion and mucosal blood flow.
    • COX-independent proinflammatory effects also contribute.
    • Luminal acid worsens the injury, which is the mechanistic rationale for acid suppression.[17]
  • Bile reflux
    • Bile salts solubilize the mucus layer and disrupt epithelial membranes, allowing acid to back-diffuse into the mucosa.[18]
  • Alcohol
    • Alcohol dissolves the mucus layer, increases mucosal permeability, and induces oxidative stress.

Histologic correlates of the three mechanisms

Feature H. pylori gastritis Autoimmune gastritis Reactive gastropathy
Distribution Antrum-predominant, pangastritis, or multifocal Corpus/fundus only; antrum spared Typically antrum
Inflammation Chronic lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with neutrophilic activity; lymphoid follicles Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate targeting oxyntic glands; progressive oxyntic atrophy Scant acute and chronic inflammatory cells
Epithelial changes Atrophy and metaplasia with chronicity Pyloric and intestinal metaplasia; ECL-cell hyperplasia Foveolar hyperplasia with corkscrew pits, mucin depletion, lamina propria smooth-muscle fibers, capillary congestion
Supporting references [1] [10] [16][18]
  • A dense surface eosinophilic band is typical of NSAID injury.[18]

The Correa cascade and precancerous progression

  • Chronic inflammation involving the corpus drives a stepwise histologic sequence:[2][19]
    1. non-atrophic gastritis
    2. atrophic gastritis
    3. intestinal metaplasia
    4. dysplasia
    5. intestinal-type adenocarcinoma
  • H. pylori is the dominant initiator, with about 75% attributable risk; it is a WHO class 1 carcinogen. AIG drives an analogous pathway restricted to the corpus.[2][19]
  • Atrophy and its subtypes
    • Atrophy is loss of native glands.
    • The glands are replaced by fibrosis (non-metaplastic atrophy), pseudopyloric/pyloric metaplasia, or intestinal metaplasia.
    • Intestinal metaplasia is therefore a subtype of atrophy, not a separate lesion.[20]
  • Pyloric metaplasia and SPEM
    • Spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia (SPEM; TFF2⁺/GIF⁺) arises when corpus chief cells are reprogrammed after oxyntic injury.
    • It can precede intestinal metaplasia or develop alongside it.
    • Single-cell data now describe region-specific, partly non-linear trajectories layered on the classic tissue-level cascade.[21][7][22]
  • Intestinal metaplasia subtype
    • Incomplete intestinal metaplasia carries a higher cancer risk than the complete type.[23]
  • Molecular changes
    • Chromosomal instability, copy-number alterations, telomere shortening, and DNA methylation accumulate across the cascade.
    • Intestinal metaplasia is often described as a relative “point of no return” that signals elevated risk.[24]
  • Gastric microbiota
    • In the achlorhydric corpus, the gastric microbiota becomes dysbiotic and genotoxic. It can perpetuate carcinogenesis even after H. pylori is lost.[1][7]
  • Progression rates
    • Non-dysplastic intestinal metaplasia progresses to cancer at a pooled rate of about 12.4 per 10,000 person-years.[19]
    • Only about 1–3% of infected people ultimately develop gastric cancer.[2]

Histologic grading and staging: updated Sydney System, OLGA, and OLGIM

  • Updated Sydney System
    • It grades chronic inflammation, activity (neutrophils), atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and H. pylori density as mild, moderate, or severe.[25]
    • It uses a defined 5-biopsy protocol: antrum ×2, corpus ×2, and incisura ×1.
    • Antral and corpus specimens go in separate jars so that atrophy can be localized.[26]
  • OLGA and OLGIM
    • OLGA (atrophy) and OLGIM (intestinal metaplasia) combine severity and topography into stages 0–IV.
    • Stages III–IV mark high cancer risk. International guidelines endorse these stages for risk stratification.[3][20]
System What it scores Strengths Limitations
Updated Sydney System Inflammation, activity, atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, H. pylori density; each graded mild/moderate/severe Standardized, topographic biopsy protocol; provides the grading that OLGA/OLGIM are built on Descriptive; does not by itself produce a cancer-risk stage
OLGA Atrophy of all subtypes (non-metaplastic, pyloric, intestinal) in antrum and corpus, combined into stages 0–IV Captures all atrophy, so OLGA stage is always at least the OLGIM stage; stages III–IV are high risk Higher interobserver variability
OLGIM Intestinal metaplasia only, in antrum and corpus, combined into stages 0–IV Lower interobserver variability; strongly elevated cancer risk at stages III–IV; measurable risk even at stage II May be less sensitive than OLGA
  • Support for the table above:[27][3]
  • Routine OLGA/OLGIM reporting remains limited in US practice.[26][28]

Clinical implications of mechanism

  • Topography predicts phenotype.
    • Antral-predominant gastritis means high acid and a tendency to duodenal ulcer.
    • Corpus-predominant atrophic gastritis means low acid and a tendency to gastric ulcer and cancer.[4]
  • Pepsinogen as a marker. Low pepsinogen I and a low pepsinogen I/II ratio signal corpus atrophy.[4]
  • Corpus-restricted atrophy with antral sparing should prompt evaluation for AIG.
    • Antral atrophy in a presumed AIG case suggests concurrent H. pylori infection.[10]
    • Corpus atrophy plus hypergastrinemia plus B12/iron deficiency suggests AIG and the risk of type 1 gastric NET.[10]
  • Reactive gastropathy is an injury pattern, not an infection. Foveolar hyperplasia with scant inflammation should prompt review of NSAIDs/aspirin, other culprit drugs, bile reflux, and alcohol.[16]
  • Timing of eradication. H. pylori eradication interrupts the cascade most effectively before atrophy or metaplasia develop. Once extensive metaplasia or dysbiosis is established, residual risk persists.[1][19]

Common pitfalls

  • Labeling endoscopic erythema “gastritis” without histology; much of it is reactive gastropathy.[16]
  • Ruling out AIG on negative PCA/IFA alone. Histology showing corpus atrophy is the anchor.[12]
  • Pooling antrum and corpus biopsies in one jar, which prevents topographic atrophy assessment and OLGA/OLGIM staging.[26]

Areas of uncertainty

  • It is debated whether intestinal metaplasia confers substantially more risk than pyloric metaplasia or atrophy alone. It is also unclear whether metaplasia without H. pylori is truly precancerous.[21]
  • Single-cell and lineage data are reframing the linear Correa cascade as a regionally stratified, partly parallel process. Diffuse-type cancer may bypass intestinal metaplasia altogether.[29][22]
  • A role for H. pylori in initiating AIG through molecular mimicry remains unproven.[10]
  • It is unsettled whether OLGA or OLGIM is the better predictor, and whether OLGIM stage II warrants surveillance.[28][27]

References

  1. ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 Malfertheiner P, Camargo MC, El-Omar E; et al. (2023). “Helicobacter pylori infection”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 9 (1): 19. doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00431-8. PMID 37081005 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Sundar R, Nakayama I, Markar SR, Shitara K, van Laarhoven HWM; et al. (2025). “Gastric cancer”. Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00052-2.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Rugge M, Sugano K, Scarpignato C; et al. (2019). “Gastric cancer prevention targeted on risk assessment: Gastritis OLGA staging”. Helicobacter. 24 (2): e12571. doi:10.1111/hel.12571. PMID 30773732.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Amieva MR, El-Omar EM (2008). “Host-bacterial interactions in Helicobacter pylori infection”. Gastroenterology. 134 (1): 306–23. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.11.009. PMID 18166359.
  5. ↑ Yao X, Smolka AJ (2019). “Gastric parietal cell physiology and Helicobacter pylori-induced disease”. Gastroenterology. 156 (8): 2158–2173. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.036. PMID 30831083.
  6. ↑ Waldum HL, Kleveland PM, Sørdal ØF (2016). “Helicobacter pylori and gastric acid: an intimate and reciprocal relationship”. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 9 (6): 836–844. doi:10.1177/1756283X16663395. PMID 27803738.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 Wizenty J, Sigal M (2025). “Helicobacter pylori, microbiota and gastric cancer – principles of microorganism-driven carcinogenesis”. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 22 (5): 296–313.
  8. ↑ Song et al. [VacA genotypes and pathogenicity]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2026.
  9. ↑ De Falco M, et al. [Helicobacter pylori pathogenesis / VacA]. J Cell Physiol. 2015.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 Lenti MV, Rugge M, Lahner E; et al. (2020). “Autoimmune gastritis”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 6 (1): 56. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0187-8. PMID 32647173 Check |pmid= value (help).
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Toh BH (2017). “Pathophysiology and laboratory diagnosis of pernicious anemia”. Immunol Res. 65 (1): 326–330. doi:10.1007/s12026-016-8841-7. PMID 27538411.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Lenti MV, Miceli E, Vanoli A, Di Sabatino A. Autoimmune gastritis: emerging insights and clinical management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026.
  13. ↑ Kishikawa H, Nakamura K, Ojiro K; et al. (2022). “Relevance of pepsinogen, gastrin, and endoscopic atrophy in the diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis”. Sci Rep. 12 (1). doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07947-1.
  14. ↑ Green R, Allen LH, Bjørke-Monsen AL; et al. (2017). “Vitamin B12 deficiency”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 3: 17040. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.40. PMID 28660890.
  15. ↑ Bergamaschi G, Di Sabatino A, Corazza GR (2018). “Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of anaemia in immune-mediated gastrointestinal disorders”. Br J Haematol. 182 (3): 319–329.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 El-Zimaity H, Riddell RH (2021). “Beyond Helicobacter: dealing with other variants of gastritis—an algorithmic approach”. Histopathology. 78 (1).
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Washington MK, Peek RM. Gastritis and gastropathy. In: Yamada’s Textbook of Gastroenterology. 7th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2022.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 Srivastava A, Lauwers GY (2007). “Pathology of non-infective gastritis”. Histopathology. 50 (1): 15–29. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02553.x. PMID 17204018.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 Gawron AJ, Shah SC, Altayar O; et al. (2020). “AGA Technical Review on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia—Natural History and Clinical Outcomes”. Gastroenterology. 158 (3): 705–731. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.001. PMID 31816300.
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 Matysiak-Budnik T, Camargo MC, Piazuelo MB, Leja M (2020). “Recent guidelines on the management of patients with gastric atrophy: common points and controversies”. Dig Dis Sci. 65 (7): 1899–1903.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 Cornish SK, Choi E, Mills JC, Goldenring JR (2026). “The origins and progression of pyloric metaplasia following gastric mucosal injury”. Physiol Rev. 106 (4): 2441–2471. doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2025.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Zhang et al. [Single-cell/lineage trajectories in gastric precancerous progression]. Pharmacol Res. 2026.
  23. ↑ Shah SC, Gawron AJ, Mustafa RA, Piazuelo MB (2020). “Histologic subtyping of gastric intestinal metaplasia: overview and considerations for clinical practice”. Gastroenterology. 158 (3): 745–750. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.004. PMID 31887261.
  24. ↑ Yeoh KG, Tan P (2022). “Mapping the genomic diaspora of gastric cancer”. Nat Rev Cancer. 22 (2): 71–84. doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00412-7. PMID 34702982 Check |pmid= value (help).
  25. ↑ Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P (1996). “Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994”. Am J Surg Pathol. 20 (10): 1161–81. doi:10.1097/00000478-199610000-00001. PMID 8827022.
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Shah SC, Piazuelo MB, Kuipers EJ, Li D (2021). “AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Atrophic Gastritis: Expert Review”. Gastroenterology. 161 (4): 1325–1332.e7. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.078. PMID 34454714 Check |pmid= value (help).
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 Benites-Goñi H, Cabrera-Hinojosa D, Latorre G; et al. (2024). “OLGA and OLGIM staging systems on the risk assessment of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts”. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. PMID 40104323 Check |pmid= value (help).
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Huang RJ, Laszkowska M, In H, Hwang JH, Epplein M (2023). “Controlling gastric cancer in a world of heterogeneous risk”. Gastroenterology. 164 (5): 736–751. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.01.018. PMID 36706842 Check |pmid= value (help).
  29. ↑ Chen et al. [Gastric carcinogenesis pathways]. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2026.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahad Hasan, M.D.[2] Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3]

Causes

Overview

Gastritis is gastric mucosal injury accompanied by a significant inflammatory infiltrate. Gastropathy is epithelial or mucosal injury with little or no inflammation, as seen in chemical (reactive) injury from NSAIDs or bile.[1] Current classification is based on cause, as set out in the Kyoto Global Consensus and the Real-World Gastritis Initiative (RE.GA.IN.).[2][3]

  • Helicobacter pylori infection is the leading cause of chronic gastritis worldwide.
  • Autoimmune gastritis is the main non-infectious cause of corpus-restricted atrophic gastritis.
  • Reactive (chemical) gastropathy from NSAIDs, aspirin, or bile reflux is the most frequent diagnosis where H. pylori is uncommon.

Less common causes include:

  • Lymphocytic, eosinophilic, granulomatous, and collagenous gastritis
  • Non–H. pylori infections, mainly in immunocompromised hosts
  • Radiation, caustic, and ischemic injury

Causes

Life-Threatening Causes

Life-threatening causes are conditions that can lead to death or permanent disability within 24 hours if left untreated.

  • Phlegmonous gastritis and its gas-forming variant, emphysematous gastritis: bacterial infection of the gastric wall with mortality of approximately 40%.[4]
  • Caustic or corrosive ingestion (acids, alkalis)[1]
  • Stress-related mucosal disease in critical illness, major surgery, burns, or trauma. This is an erosive, ischemia- and acid-mediated gastropathy, not true inflammatory gastritis.
  • Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and other opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients, which can present as ulceration with bleeding[4]

Common Causes

  • H. pylori infection[5]
  • Autoimmune gastritis[6]
  • NSAIDs and aspirin, which cause reactive gastropathy[1]
  • Bile (duodenogastric) reflux[7]

Causes by Etiologic Category

Helicobacter pylori Infection

  • H. pylori is the most common cause of chronic gastritis worldwide and is a WHO/IARC group 1 carcinogen.[5]
    • It colonizes approximately 43% of the world population.
    • Infection is usually acquired in childhood and persists for life if untreated.
  • It produces chronic active gastritis, which stays asymptomatic for decades in most carriers.[5]
  • Phenotype depends on topography:[5][8]
  • Bacterial virulence factors are the main determinants of inflammatory intensity and cancer risk. These are a functional cag pathogenicity island (CagA) and the vacuolating cytotoxin VacA.[5]
  • Long-standing infection drives the Correa cascade:[9]
    • Non-atrophic gastritis → multifocal atrophic gastritis → intestinal metaplasia → dysplasia → adenocarcinoma.
    • The rate ratio for atrophic gastritis in infected versus uninfected persons is approximately 5.0.
    • Atrophy incidence in uninfected persons is below 1% per year.
  • Helicobacter heilmannii is a less common cause of Helicobacter gastritis.[4]

Autoimmune Gastritis

  • Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is immune-mediated destruction of parietal (oxyntic) cells.[6][10]
    • It is restricted to the corpus and fundus and spares the antrum, which is the reverse of most H. pylori gastritis.
    • It is not self-limiting.
  • Mechanism:[6]
    • The gastric H+/K+ ATPase (proton pump) is the major autoantigen.
    • Autoreactive T cells drive parietal cell loss.
    • Anti-parietal cell antibodies (PCA) and anti-intrinsic factor antibodies (IFA) are produced.
  • Consequences are hypo- or achlorhydria, loss of intrinsic factor, and hypergastrinemia. These lead to malabsorption of:[11][12]
  • AIG accounts for approximately 20–27% of obscure or refractory iron-deficiency anemia.[12]
  • Pernicious anemia is a late complication of AIG, not a synonym for it.[10]
  • Other complications are type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors and increased gastric adenocarcinoma risk.[6][13]
  • Epidemiology:[9]
    • Estimated prevalence is approximately 0.5–2% and rises with age.
    • Women are more often affected.
    • AIG is strongly associated with autoimmune thyroid disease (up to about one-third of these patients have AIG) and type 1 diabetes mellitus.
    • Racial and ethnic variation is less prominent than in H. pylori-associated atrophic gastritis.
  • Potential and seronegative AIG are now recognized variants.[10]
  • H. pylori may trigger AIG through molecular mimicry, but this has not been proven.[6][14]

Reactive (Chemical) Gastropathy

Histologic features are:[15][1]

  • Foveolar hyperplasia (“corkscrew” glands)
  • Lamina propria edema
  • Smooth muscle fibers extending into the lamina propria
  • Vascular ectasia
  • Minimal inflammation

It is the most common histopathologic gastric change in large US biopsy cohorts, and its prevalence rises with age.[16]

Causes:

Other Non-Infectious Gastritides

Non–H. pylori Infectious Gastritis

These infections occur mostly in immunocompromised hosts: HIV, transplant, chemotherapy, high-dose corticosteroids, diabetes mellitus, and malnutrition.[7][4]

Physical, Caustic, and Ischemic Injury

  • Radiation therapy to the upper abdomen causes radiation gastropathy.[1]
  • Ingestion of caustic or corrosive agents (acids, alkalis) or other chemical irritants causes direct injury.[1]
  • Gastric hypoperfusion and stress-related mucosal disease are erosive gastropathies, not inflammatory gastritis.

Etiologic Cofactors

These factors modify disease rather than cause it on their own.

  • Tobacco and high-salt diet are cofactors for non-autoimmune atrophic gastritis and accelerate H. pylori-associated atrophy.[9][21]
  • Alcohol contributes to reactive gastropathy.[19]
  • Coffee, acidic beverages, and spicy or fatty foods may provoke dyspeptic symptoms. They are not established causes of histologic gastritis in current classifications.[3]

Summary of Etiologic Categories

Category Principal causes Typical pattern Key association
H. pylori H. pylori; rarely H. heilmannii Chronic active gastritis; antral-predominant or multifocal atrophy Peptic ulcer; gastric adenocarcinoma; MALT lymphoma
Autoimmune Anti-parietal cell immunity (H+/K+ ATPase) Corpus-restricted atrophy with antral sparing Iron or B12 deficiency; type 1 gastric NET; thyroid disease and type 1 diabetes
Reactive gastropathy NSAIDs/aspirin, bile reflux, bisphosphonates, iron, doxycycline, alcohol Foveolar hyperplasia with minimal inflammation Remove the offending agent; not an infection
Other non-infectious Celiac disease, allergy, Crohn’s disease, sarcoidosis Lymphocytic, eosinophilic, granulomatous, or collagenous patterns Systemic disease outside the stomach
Non–H. pylori infectious CMV, HSV, phlegmonous bacteria, fungi, parasites Ulcers or erosions; mural infection Immunocompromise; phlegmonous form carries ~40% mortality
Physical/caustic/ischemic Radiation, caustic ingestion, hypoperfusion, critical illness Erosive gastropathy Emergency presentations

[2][14]

References

  1. ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 Washington MK, Peek RM (2022). “Gastritis and gastropathy”. Yamada’s Textbook of Gastroenterology (7th ed.).
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Sugano K, Tack J, Kuipers EJ; et al. (2015). “Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis”. Gut. 64 (9): 1353–67. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309252. PMID 26187502.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Rugge M, Genta RM, Malfertheiner P; et al. (2024). “RE.GA.IN.: the Real-world Gastritis Initiative—updating the updates”. Gut. 73 (3): 407–441. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331164. PMID 38383142 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Panarelli NC (2021). “Infectious diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract”. Histopathology. 78 (1). PMID 33382485 Check |pmid= value (help).
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Malfertheiner P, Camargo MC, El-Omar E, Liou JM, Peek R, Schulz C, Smith SI, Suerbaum S (2023). “Helicobacter pylori infection”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 9 (1): 19. doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00431-8. PMID 37081005 Check |pmid= value (help).
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Lenti MV, Rugge M, Lahner E, Miceli E, Toh BH, Genta RM, De Block C, Hershko C, Di Sabatino A (2020). “Autoimmune gastritis”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 6 (1): 56. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0187-8. PMID 32647173 Check |pmid= value (help).
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 El-Zimaity H, Choi WT, Lauwers GY, Riddell R (2018). “The differential diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori negative gastritis”. Virchows Arch. 473 (5): 533–550. doi:10.1007/s00428-018-2454-8. PMID 30229307.
  8. ↑ Suerbaum S, Michetti P (2002). “Helicobacter pylori infection”. N Engl J Med. 347 (15): 1175–86. doi:10.1056/NEJMra020542. PMID 12374879.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Shah SC, Piazuelo MB, Kuipers EJ, Li D (2021). “AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Atrophic Gastritis: Expert Review”. Gastroenterology. 161 (4): 1325–1332.e7. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.078. PMID 34454714 Check |pmid= value (help).
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 Lenti MV, Miceli E, Vanoli A, Di Sabatino A (2026). “Autoimmune gastritis: emerging insights and clinical management”. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol.
  11. ↑ Toh BH (2017). “Pathophysiology and laboratory diagnosis of pernicious anemia”. Immunol Res. 65 (1): 326–330. doi:10.1007/s12026-016-8841-7. PMID 27538411.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Bergamaschi G, Di Sabatino A, Corazza GR (2018). “Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of anaemia in immune-mediated gastrointestinal disorders”. Br J Haematol. 182 (3): 319–329. doi:10.1111/bjh.15254.
  13. ↑ Kishikawa H, Nakamura K, Ojiro K, Katayama T, Arahata K, Takarabe S; et al. (2022). “Relevance of pepsinogen, gastrin, and endoscopic atrophy in the diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis”. Sci Rep. 12 (1): 4202. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07947-1. PMID 35273265 Check |pmid= value (help).
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Rugge M, Savarino E, Sbaraglia M, Bricca L, Malfertheiner P (2021). “Gastritis: the clinico-pathological spectrum”. Dig Liver Dis. 53 (10): 1237–1246. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2021.03.007. PMID 33785282 Check |pmid= value (help).
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 El-Zimaity H, Riddell RH (2021). “Beyond Helicobacter: dealing with other variants of gastritis—an algorithmic approach”. Histopathology.
  16. ↑ Maguilnik I, Neumann WL, Sonnenberg A, Genta RM (2012). “Reactive gastropathy is associated with inflammatory conditions throughout the gastrointestinal tract”. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 36 (8): 736–43. doi:10.1111/apt.12031. PMID 22928604.
  17. ↑ Laine L (1996). “Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy”. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 6 (3): 489–504. PMID 8803564.
  18. ↑ Nakamura M, Haruma K, Kamada T, Mihara M, Yoshihara M, Imagawa M; et al. (2001). “Duodenogastric reflux is associated with antral metaplastic gastritis”. Gastrointest Endosc. 53 (1): 53–9. doi:10.1067/mge.2001.111385. PMID 11154489.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 Franke A, Teyssen S, Singer MV (2005). “Alcohol-related diseases of the esophagus and stomach”. Dig Dis. 23 (3–4): 204–13. doi:10.1159/000090167. PMID 16508284.
  20. ↑ Varbanova M, Frauenschläger K, Malfertheiner P (2014). “Chronic gastritis—an update”. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 28 (6): 1031–42. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2014.10.005. PMID 25439069.
  21. ↑ Nakamura M, Haruma K, Kamada T, Mihara M, Yoshihara M, Sumioka M; et al. (2002). “Cigarette smoking promotes atrophic gastritis in Helicobacter pylori-positive subjects”. Dig Dis Sci. 47 (3): 675–81. PMID 11911358.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahad Hasan, M.D.[2] Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3]

Differentiating Gastritis from other Diseases

Overview

Gastritis must be differentiated from peptic ulcer disease, gastric cancer, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastroenteritis, crohn’s disease, gastrinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma and primary gastric lymphoma.

Differentiating Gastritis from other Diseases

Differentiating gastritis from other Diseases:

Differential Diagnosis
Disease Cause Symptoms Diagnosis Other findings
Pain Nausea & Vomiting Heartburn Belching or Bloating Weight loss Loss of Appetite Stools Endoscopy findings
Location Aggravating Factors Alleviating Factors
Acute gastritis Food Antacids ✔ ✔ ✔ – ✔ Black stools –
Chronic gastritis Food Antacids ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ – H. pylori gastritis

Lymphocytic gastritis

  • Enlarged folds
  • Aphthoid erosions
–
Atrophic gastritis – – ✔ – ✔ ✔ – H. pylori

Autoimmune

Crohn’s disease – – – – – ✔ ✔
  • Mucosal nodularity with cobblestoning
  • Multiple aphthous ulcers
  • Linier or serpiginous ulcerations
  • Thickened antral folds
  • Antral narrowing
  • Hypoperistalsis
  • Duodenal strictures
GERD
  • Spicy food
  • Tight fitting clothing
✔

(Suspect delayed gastric emptying)

✔ – – – – Other symptoms:

Complications

Peptic ulcer disease

Duodenal ulcer

  • Pain aggravates with empty stomach

Gastric ulcer

  • Pain aggravates with food
  • Pain alleviates with food
✔ ✔ – – – Gastric ulcers
  • Discrete mucosal lesions with a punched-out smooth ulcer base with whitish fibrinoid base
  • Most ulcers are at the junction of fundus and antrum
  • 0.5-2.5cm

Duodenal ulcers

Other diagnostic tests
Gastrinoma – – ✔

(suspect gastric outlet obstruction)

✔ – – – Useful in collecting the tissue for biopsy

Diagnostic tests

Gastric Adenocarcinoma – – ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
  • Multiple biopsies are taken to establish the diagnosis
Other symptoms
Primary gastric lymphoma – – – – – ✔ – – Useful in collecting the tissue for biopsy Other symptoms

References

  1. ↑ Sugimachi K, Inokuchi K, Kuwano H, Ooiwa T (1984). “Acute gastritis clinically classified in accordance with data from both upper GI series and endoscopy”. Scand J Gastroenterol. 19 (1): 31–7. PMID 6710074.
  2. ↑ Sipponen P, Maaroos HI (2015). “Chronic gastritis”. Scand J Gastroenterol. 50 (6): 657–67. doi:10.3109/00365521.2015.1019918. PMC 4673514. PMID 25901896.
  3. ↑ Sartor RB (2006). “Mechanisms of disease: pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis”. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 3 (7): 390–407. doi:10.1038/ncpgasthep0528. PMID 16819502.
  4. ↑ Sipponen P (1989). “Atrophic gastritis as a premalignant condition”. Ann Med. 21 (4): 287–90. PMID 2789799.
  5. ↑ Badillo R, Francis D (2014). “Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease”. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 5 (3): 105–12. doi:10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i3.105. PMC 4133436. PMID 25133039.
  6. ↑ Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC (2007). “Peptic ulcer disease”. Am Fam Physician. 76 (7): 1005–12. PMID 17956071.
  7. ↑ Banasch M, Schmitz F (2007). “Diagnosis and treatment of gastrinoma in the era of proton pump inhibitors”. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 119 (19–20): 573–8. doi:10.1007/s00508-007-0884-2. PMID 17985090.
  8. ↑ Dicken BJ, Bigam DL, Cass C, Mackey JR, Joy AA, Hamilton SM (2005). “Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions”. Ann Surg. 241 (1): 27–39. PMC 1356843. PMID 15621988.
  9. ↑ Ghimire P, Wu GY, Zhu L (2011). “Primary gastrointestinal lymphoma”. World J Gastroenterol. 17 (6): 697–707. doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i6.697. PMC 3042647. PMID 21390139.

​​

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[2]

Epidemiology and Demographics

Overview

The epidemiology of gastritis is best described by etiologic subtype rather than by the older acute vs chronic division, which does not track with cause, demographics, or cancer risk. Helicobacter pylori–associated gastritis is the dominant entity worldwide. Nearly all chronically infected individuals have histologic chronic active gastritis.[1] Global adult H. pylori prevalence fell from 52.6% before 1990 to 43.9% in 2015–2022, but prevalence in children and adolescents (~35%) has not declined in any WHO region.[2] In the United States, H. pylori positivity is falling overall, but it remains disproportionately high in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic individuals, and the racial gap has widened.[3]

Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is the shared pre-neoplastic phenotype of long-standing H. pylori infection and autoimmune gastritis (AIG). Its prevalence ranges from ~5% in low–gastric-cancer-incidence populations to ~50% in high-incidence populations.[4] AIG has a pooled global prevalence of ~3.9%, with a female predominance and strong overlap with other autoimmune diseases.[5] Eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) is rare, at ~6.3 per 100,000 in the US. It is more common in females and young children and is frequently underdiagnosed.[6]

Epidemiology and Demographics

Helicobacter pylori–associated Gastritis

H. pylori is the most common cause of gastritis worldwide and the most common chronic bacterial infection in humans.[1]

  • The crude global prevalence of H. pylori in adults fell from 52.6% (before 1990) to 43.9% (2015–2022). A systematic review of 1,748 studies from 111 countries estimated a ~15.9% decline in adults over three decades.[2]
  • An independent meta-analysis of 224 studies from 71 countries found a parallel decline, from 58.2% (1980–1990) to 43.1% (2011–2022). Prevalence was relatively static from 1991 to 2010, then fell sharply from 2011 to 2022, with the largest drop in the WHO African region.[7]
  • The decline is confined to adults. Prevalence in children and adolescents remained ~35.1% in 2015–2022, with no significant reduction in any WHO region. This reflects ongoing early-life transmission.[2]
  • Prevalence is inversely associated with income level, Human Development Index, and universal health coverage. Some low-resource settings still exceed 60–70%.[1][7]
  • Studies using serologic testing consistently report higher prevalence than studies using non-serologic (active-infection) testing.[7]
Adult H. pylori prevalence by WHO region, 2010–2022[2]
WHO region Adult prevalence
African 52.7%
Eastern Mediterranean 52.6%
Southeast Asian 46.7%
Western Pacific 43.2%
Americas 42.5%
European 39.6%

United States

  • Historical North American prevalence estimates are 30–40%. Contemporary non-serologic testing gives lower figures.[1]
  • In a nationwide Veterans Health Administration cohort of 913,328 adults tested for H. pylori between 1999 and 2018, 25.8% tested positive. Positivity fell from 35.9% (1999–2006) to 18.4% (2013–2018).[3]
  • Positivity by race and ethnicity in this cohort:[3]
    • Non-Hispanic Black: 40.2%
    • Hispanic: 36.7%
    • Non-Hispanic other: 27.7%
    • Non-Hispanic White: 20.1%
  • The highest state-level rates were among non-Hispanic Black individuals in Mississippi (54%) and Alabama (50.9%).[3]
  • The disparity is widening. The gap between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White individuals was largest in the most recent period, 2013–2018 (32.1% vs 13.3%; ~2.4-fold).[3]
  • A reference-laboratory study of 624,444 samples (2005–2014) found 24.8% seroprevalence. Rates exceeded 30% in the southern US (e.g., Texas, New Mexico) and the Southeast.[1]

Age and Birth-cohort Effect

  • Higher prevalence in older adults reflects a birth cohort effect, not increased acquisition in later life.[8]
  • About 90% of infections are acquired in childhood, typically before age 10, and persist lifelong unless treated.[8]
  • In a longitudinal cohort, overall incidence was ~1.4%/year. Incidence peaked at ages 4–5 (2.1%/year) and fell to 0.3%/year by ages 21–23.[8]
  • Spontaneous clearance is uncommon but occurs, notably in advanced atrophic gastritis.[8]

Sex

  • Globally, H. pylori prevalence is modestly higher in men (OR ~1.12; 95% CI 1.09–1.15).[1]

Immigration

  • First-generation immigrants from high-prevalence regions (e.g., Mexico, Central America) have higher prevalence than the destination population. This difference attenuates with longer residence and in subsequent generations.[1]
  • In a Houston cohort, first-generation immigrant status and Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity were the individual risk factors with the best predictive performance for H. pylori infection.[9]

Chronic Atrophic Gastritis

CAG is the convergent pre-neoplastic phenotype of long-standing H. pylori infection and of AIG, and an early step in the Correa cascade.[4]

  • Prevalence:
    • ~10–15% in the US[4]
    • ~5% in populations with low gastric-cancer incidence[4]
    • Up to ~50% in populations with high gastric-cancer incidence[4]
    • ~25% (95% CI 18–32%) pooled worldwide (2010–2020 studies)[10]
  • H. pylori as the main driver: the incidence rate ratio for atrophic gastritis in infected vs uninfected individuals is 5.0 (95% CI 3.1–8.3). Annual incidence in uninfected persons is <1%.[4]
  • Other risk factors for non-autoimmune CAG: older age, tobacco use, high-salt diet, and possibly chronic bile reflux.[4]
  • Gastric cancer risk:
    • Progression from CAG to gastric adenocarcinoma is estimated at ~0.1–0.3%/year. Risk rises with atrophy severity and extent and with concomitant intestinal metaplasia.[4]
    • A meta-analysis of 23 studies found a 4.12-fold increased risk of incident gastric cancer with CAG (OR 4.12; 95% CI 3.20–5.30). Risk estimates were higher when CAG was diagnosed histologically rather than serologically.[11]
    • A meta-analysis reported a pooled standardized incidence ratio for gastric cancer of 20.7 (95% CI 14.0–30.2), substantially higher with extensive than with antral-predominant atrophy.[12]
    • In a US commercially insured cohort aged 18–64 with CAG (107,835 individuals), the crude incidence of non-cardia gastric cancer was 98 per 100,000 person-years.[13] Risk was higher in men, in those aged 50–64, and in patients with anemia, smoking, or a family history of digestive neoplasms.[13]

Autoimmune Gastritis

AIG is a corpus-restricted, antral-sparing chronic atrophic gastritis mediated by anti-parietal cell and anti-intrinsic factor autoimmunity. It is substantially less common than H. pylori–associated CAG.[4]

  • Prevalence depends heavily on the diagnostic method:
    • Histology/endoscopy-based estimates: ~0.5–2%[4]
    • Pooled global prevalence (47 studies; 15,817 individuals): 3.85% (95% CI 2.94–5.04%)[5]
    • Pooled estimates by method: 5.4% by serology alone, 2.71% by histology, and 1.81% by combined serology and histology[5]
    • Individual serology-only population studies report figures as high as ~19.5%, which overestimates true disease[14]
  • Geography: AIG was historically considered a Western disease but is now recognized globally.[15] Pooled prevalence by region:[5]
    • Africa: 8.46%
    • Australia: 8.08%
    • Europe: 4.94%
    • Americas: 2.82%
    • Asia: 2.23%
  • Age and sex: prevalence increases with age and is rare before age 30. There is a consistent female predominance.[14]
  • Race/ethnicity: marked racial or ethnic variation is not considered characteristic of AIG.[4] However, a Houston safety-net cohort identified non-White race, female sex, older age, non-tobacco use, and absence of H. pylori as factors associated with AIG.[16]
  • High-risk populations:[4][15]
  • Pernicious anemia (late-stage AIG) has an estimated prevalence of ~0.15–1% in the general population and ~2% in people older than 60.[4][14]
  • Neoplastic risk:
    • Type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors are consistently increased, with an estimated incidence of ~0.4–0.7%/year in chronic atrophic gastritis.[4]
    • In a US cohort, gastric malignancy risk (mainly neuroendocrine tumors) was 2.7-fold higher in AIG than in non-autoimmune atrophic gastritis.[16]
    • Whether AIG independently increases gastric adenocarcinoma risk, after accounting for H. pylori, remains debated (see below).[16]

Eosinophilic Gastritis

EoG is a rare type-2 (Th2) immune–mediated eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder. It is defined histologically by gastric eosinophilia (≥30 eosinophils/HPF in ≥5 HPFs) in the appropriate clinical context, after secondary causes are excluded.[17]

  • Prevalence: ~6.3 per 100,000 in US administrative-database estimates.[6]
  • Trend: prevalence appears to be rising. Evolving case definitions and likely underdiagnosis limit precise estimates.[17][18]
  • Demographics: there is a female predominance (~7.9 vs 5.4 per 100,000). EoG is diagnosed more often in children than adults, with the highest prevalence in children younger than 5. It is associated with atopic comorbidities.[6][17]
  • Underdiagnosis:

Areas of Uncertainty

  • True AIG prevalence is unknown. Estimates diverge several-fold between serology-based and histology-based studies. No Western population-based, histologically confirmed prevalence study exists.[14][5]
  • Independent adenocarcinoma risk in AIG is contested. Many studies suggesting elevated risk did not exclude concomitant or prior H. pylori infection. Neuroendocrine tumor risk, by contrast, is consistently elevated.[16]
  • US H. pylori testing targets differ by guidance.
    • The Houston Consensus Conference and ACG identify partially different high-risk groups.[9]
    • In external validation, only Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity (AUROC 0.57) and first-generation immigrant status (AUROC 0.59) showed meaningful predictive value as individual risk factors.[9]
    • A combined model improved performance only modestly (AUROC 0.64).[9]
  • Western CAG cancer-risk data are methodologically limited. Studies separate atrophy from intestinal metaplasia, and autoimmune from H. pylori etiology, inconsistently.[12]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Chey WD, Howden CW, Moss SF, Morgan DR, Greer KB, Grover S, Shah SC (2024). “ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection”. Am J Gastroenterol. 119 (9): 1730–1753. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002968. PMID 39626064 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Chen YC, Malfertheiner P, Yu HT, Kuo CL, Chang YY, Meng FT, Wu YX, Hsiao JL, Chen MJ, Lin KP, Wu CY, Lin JT, O’Morain C, Megraud F, Lee WC, El-Omar EM, Wu MS, Liou JM (2024). “Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and incidence of gastric cancer between 1980 and 2022”. Gastroenterology. 166 (4): 605–619. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.12.022. PMID 38176660 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Shah SC, Halvorson AE, Lee D, Bustamante R, McBay B, Gupta R, Denton J, Dorn C, Wilson O, Peek R Jr, Gupta S, Liu L, Hung A, Greevy R, Roumie CL (2024). “Helicobacter pylori burden in the United States according to individual demographics and geography: a nationwide analysis of the Veterans Healthcare System”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.016. PMID 37245717 Check |pmid= value (help).
  4. ↑ 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 Shah SC, Piazuelo MB, Kuipers EJ, Li D (2021). “AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Atrophic Gastritis: Expert Review”. Gastroenterology. 161 (4): 1325–1332.e7. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.078. PMID 34454714 Check |pmid= value (help).
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Li M, Huang Y, Liang X, Lu H. Prevalence of autoimmune gastritis worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Helicobacter. 2025.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Jensen ET, Martin CF, Kappelman MD, Dellon ES (2016). “Prevalence of eosinophilic gastritis, gastroenteritis, and colitis: estimates from a national administrative database”. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 62 (1): 36–42. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000000865. PMC 4654708. PMID 25988554.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Li Y, Choi H, Leung K, Jiang F, Graham DY, Leung WK (2023). “Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection between 1980 and 2022: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 8 (6): 553–564. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00070-5. PMID 37086739 Check |pmid= value (help).
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Malfertheiner P, Camargo MC, El-Omar E, et al. (2023). “Helicobacter pylori infection”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 9 (1): 19. doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00431-8. PMID 37081005 Check |pmid= value (help).
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Nguyen Wenker T, Peng FB, Emelogu I, Mallepally N, Kanwal F, El-Serag HB, Tan MC (2023). “The predictive performance of contemporary guideline recommendations for Helicobacter pylori testing in a United States population”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 21 (7): 1771–1780.
  10. ↑ Yin Y, Liang H, Wei N, Zheng Z (2022). “Prevalence of chronic atrophic gastritis worldwide from 2010 to 2020: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis”. Ann Palliat Med. 11 (12).
  11. ↑ Li J, Pan J, Xiao D, Shen N, Wang R, Miao H, Pu P, Zhang H, Yv X, Xing L (2024). “Chronic atrophic gastritis and risk of incident upper gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. J Transl Med. 22. doi:10.1186/s12967-023-04736-w. PMID 38711123 Check |pmid= value (help).
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Burke E, Harkins P, Arumugasamy M. Gastric atrophy and gastric cancer: a meta-analytical assessment of risk and the influence of topographical distribution. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Huang RJ, Balasubramanian V, Shum MV, Ji HP, Hwang JH (2025). “Incidence of non-cardia gastric cancer among commercially-insured individuals aged 18–64 with chronic atrophic gastritis”. PLoS One. 20: e0315833. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315833.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 Lenti MV, Rugge M, Lahner E, Miceli E, Toh BH, Genta RM, De Block C, Hershko C, Di Sabatino A (2020). “Autoimmune gastritis”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 6 (1): 56. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0187-8. PMID 32647173 Check |pmid= value (help).
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Lenti MV, Miceli E, Vanoli A, Di Sabatino A. Autoimmune gastritis: emerging insights and clinical management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 Tan MC, Caskey KN, Lee IJ, et al. (2026). “Characteristics and incidence of gastric cancer among patients with autoimmune and non-autoimmune atrophic gastritis in a U.S. population”. Dig Dis Sci. doi:10.1007/s10620-026-09800-1. PMID 41781724 Check |pmid= value (help).
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 Lenti MV, Rossi CM, Dellon ES, et al. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2026.
  18. ↑ Rothenberg ME, Chehade M, Dellon ES, et al. Eosinophilic gastritis: burden of disease, diagnostic challenges and unmet needs. Gut. 2026.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Chehade M, Kamboj AP, Atkins D, Gehman LT (2021). “Diagnostic delay in patients with eosinophilic gastritis and/or duodenitis: a population-based study”. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 9 (5): 2050–2059.e20.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahad Hasan, M.D.[2] Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3]

Risk Factors

Overview

Gastritis is best stratified by etiology rather than by symptom-based lists, because etiology determines cancer risk, surveillance, and treatment.[1] The two dominant, clinically decisive risk factors are chronic Helicobacter pylori infection and autoimmunity.[2] NSAIDs and aspirin, critical illness, bile reflux, and heavy alcohol use mainly produce reactive (chemical) or erosive gastropathy, an epithelial injury pattern with minimal inflammation.[3][4] Cigarette smoking, high-salt diet, increasing age, male sex, and family history of gastric cancer act mainly as cofactors that promote progression of chronic gastritis toward atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and cancer.[5][6]

Risk Factors

  • Risk factors differ by histologic entity:
    • Inflammatory gastritis (immune-cell infiltrate): H. pylori infection and autoimmunity.[2]
    • Reactive/chemical gastropathy (epithelial injury, minimal inflammation): NSAIDs/aspirin, bile reflux, alcohol, and stress-related mucosal disease of critical illness.[3][4]
  • Distinguishing these entities matters because only inflammatory gastritis (particularly corpus-predominant or atrophic forms) carries meaningful long-term neoplastic risk.[1]

Established Risk Factors

Helicobacter pylori Infection

  • Single most important and most prevalent cause of chronic gastritis worldwide; classified as a WHO class I carcinogen.[7]
  • Estimated to infect ~43% of adults globally and ~18% of US adults.[8]
  • Usually acquired in childhood and persists for life if untreated; most infected hosts have chronic–active gastritis that remains asymptomatic for decades.[7]
  • Acquisition risk is higher with lower socioeconomic status, household crowding, and birth in or immigration from high-prevalence regions.[4]
  • Gastritis phenotype determines downstream disease:[7][9]
    • Antral-predominant gastritis → acid hypersecretion → duodenal ulcer risk
    • Corpus-predominant gastritis or pangastritis → atrophy, hypochlorhydria, and gastric cancer risk
  • Infection strongly drives atrophic gastritis: incidence rate ratio 5.0 (95% CI 3.1–8.3) in infected versus uninfected individuals, with <1% annual incidence in uninfected persons.[2]
  • Strain virulence factors (functional cag pathogenicity island, CagA, VacA) modulate the severity of inflammation and oncogenic potential.[7]

Autoimmunity (Autoimmune Gastritis)

  • Corpus-restricted atrophic gastritis driven by autoreactive CD4+ T cells targeting the parietal-cell H+/K+ ATPase, causing oxyntic gland loss, hypo-/achlorhydria, and intrinsic factor deficiency; pernicious anemia is a late-stage manifestation.[10][11]
  • Risk factors and associations:
  • Estimated prevalence ~0.5–2% (higher in serology-based studies); unlike H. pylori-associated atrophy, it lacks marked racial/ethnic variation.[2][12]
  • Now recognized as a global disorder with a broad clinical spectrum and its own risk of gastric adenocarcinoma and type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors.[13]

NSAIDs and Aspirin

  • With H. pylori, one of the two leading causes of gastroduodenal mucosal injury.[9]
  • Mechanism: COX-1 inhibition with loss of mucosal prostaglandin protection, plus COX-independent topical injury; antral histology in H. pylori-negative users is typically reactive/chemical gastropathy.[3]
  • 15–30% of long-term NSAID users develop endoscopic ulcers, and serious GI complications occur in 1–4% of users annually.[14]
  • Risk is dose- and duration-dependent; aspirin carries risk comparable to other NSAIDs, and dual antiplatelet therapy raises it further.[15]
  • Risk amplifiers:[14][15]
    • Prior ulcer or GI complication (strongest; OR up to ~13.5)
    • Advancing age
    • Concomitant corticosteroids, anticoagulants, SSRIs, or combined NSAID/aspirin use
    • Concurrent H. pylori infection (synergistic)
  • GI toxicity varies by agent: lower with ibuprofen, etodolac, nabumetone, and COX-2–selective inhibitors; higher with piroxicam, indomethacin, and ketorolac.[14]
  • Acute, multifactorial mucosal injury driven by splanchnic hypoperfusion, reduced mucosal defenses, and acid back-diffusion; it is distinct from the poorly defined “stress” of outpatient dyspepsia.[16]
  • Upper GI mucosal lesions are found in 75–100% of ICU patients, but clinically important bleeding is uncommon (1.5% in a 2,252-patient prospective cohort).[16][17]
  • Major independent risk factors:[17]
  • Bleeding occurred in 3.7% of patients with one or both major factors versus 0.1% of those without.[17]
  • Additional risk factors: severe head or spinal cord injury, multiple trauma, extensive burns, hepatic failure, shock, sepsis, acute kidney injury, prolonged ICU stay, and high-dose corticosteroids.[16]
  • Early enteral nutrition appears protective.[16]

Probable Risk Factors and Cofactors

  • Bile (duodenogastric) reflux produces reactive gastropathy and is associated with antral metaplastic change; it may contribute to nonautoimmune atrophic gastritis, particularly after gastric surgery.[2][18]
  • Heavy alcohol use causes acute hemorrhagic/erosive gastropathy;[19] heavy drinking independently predicts upper GI symptoms (OR ~2.4),[20] and high intake (≥4 drinks/day) is associated with gastric cancer (pooled OR 1.37).[8]
  • Cigarette smoking promotes atrophic gastritis in H. pylori-positive individuals and progression along the Correa cascade; current smokers have ~25–50% higher gastric cancer risk, with dose- and duration-dependence and normalization ~10 years after cessation.[21][5]
  • High-salt diet damages the mucosa, promotes H. pylori colonization, and interacts more than multiplicatively with H. pylori for gastric cancer risk (interaction OR 2.62).[8][22]
  • Increasing age is associated with greater prevalence and severity of atrophic gastritis and independently predicts progression to cancer.[2][6]
  • Male sex (HR 1.86) and family history of digestive neoplasm (HR 1.45) independently predict progression of chronic atrophic gastritis to non-cardia gastric cancer.[6]

Controversial or Weakly Supported Factors

  • Whether H. pylori triggers autoimmune gastritis (e.g., via molecular mimicry with H+/K+ ATPase) remains unresolved; H. pylori-dependent and -independent pathways are both proposed.[10][13]
  • Whether H. pylori adds to short-term NSAID injury is contested; the interaction is likely additive rather than causal.[3]
  • Sepsis as an independent risk factor for stress-related mucosal disease is inconsistently supported.[16]
  • Everyday psychological stress is a weak, poorly validated contributor.[23]
  • Evidence that moderate alcohol, caffeine, or acidic beverages cause histologic chronic gastritis is weak and confounded.[19]

Summary of Risk Factors

Risk factor Predominant lesion
H. pylori infection Chronic–active gastritis → atrophy, metaplasia
Autoimmunity Corpus-restricted atrophic gastritis
NSAIDs/aspirin Reactive gastropathy, erosions, ulcers
Critical illness (ventilation >48 h, coagulopathy) Stress-related mucosal disease
Bile reflux Reactive gastropathy
Heavy alcohol use Acute erosive/hemorrhagic gastropathy
Cigarette smoking Progression of atrophic gastritis
High-salt diet Progression of H. pylori gastritis
Age, male sex, family history of gastric cancer Progression of atrophic gastritis
Psychological stress, caffeine, moderate alcohol —

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Rugge M, Genta RM, Malfertheiner P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, El-Serag H, Graham DY, Kuipers EJ, Leung WK, Park JY, Rokkas T, Schulz C, El-Omar EM (2024). “RE.GA.IN.: the Real-world Gastritis Initiative-updating the updates”. Gut. 73 (3): 407–441. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331164. PMID 38383142 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Shah SC, Piazuelo MB, Kuipers EJ, Li D (2021). “AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Atrophic Gastritis: Expert Review”. Gastroenterology. 161 (4): 1325–1332.e7. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.078. PMID 34454714 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Bjarnason I, Scarpignato C, Holmgren E, Olszewski M, Rainsford KD, Lanas A (2018). “Mechanisms of Damage to the Gastrointestinal Tract From Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs”. Gastroenterology. 154 (3): 500–514. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.049. PMID 29221664.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Washington MK, Peek RM Jr. Gastritis and gastropathy. In: Yamada’s Textbook of Gastroenterology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2022.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Thrift AP, Wenker TN, El-Serag HB (2023). “Global burden of gastric cancer: epidemiological trends, risk factors, screening and prevention”. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 20: 338–349.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Huang RJ, Balasubramanian V, Shum MV, Ji HP, Hwang JH. Incidence of non-cardia gastric cancer among commercially-insured individuals aged 18-64 with chronic atrophic gastritis. PLoS One. 2024.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Malfertheiner P, Camargo MC, El-Omar E, Liou JM, Peek R, Schulz C, Smith SI, Suerbaum S (2023). “Helicobacter pylori infection”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 9 (1): 19. doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00431-8. PMID 37081005 Check |pmid= value (help).
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Patel et al. Gastric cancer: a review. JAMA. 2026.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Vakil N (2024). “Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review”. JAMA. 332 (21): 1832–1842. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.19094. PMID 39466269 Check |pmid= value (help).
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Lenti MV, Rugge M, Lahner E, Miceli E, Toh BH, Genta RM, De Block C, Hershko C, Di Sabatino A (2020). “Autoimmune gastritis”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 6 (1): 56. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0187-8. PMID 32647173 Check |pmid= value (help).
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Rustgi SD, Bijlani P, Shah SC (2021). “Autoimmune gastritis, with or without pernicious anemia: epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical management”. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 14: 17562848211038771. doi:10.1177/17562848211038771. PMID 34484423 Check |pmid= value (help).
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Li et al. Helicobacter. 2025.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Lenti MV, et al. Autoimmune gastritis: emerging insights and clinical management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 Wilcox CM, Allison J, Benzuly K, Borum M, Cryer B, Grosser T, Hunt R, Ladabaum U, Lanas A, Paulus H, Regueiro C, Sandler RS, Simon L (2006). “Consensus development conference on the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, including cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme inhibitors and aspirin”. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 4 (9): 1082–9. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2006.04.010. PMID 16877048.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 McConaghy JR, Decker A, Nair S (2023). “Peptic Ulcer Disease and Helicobacter pylori Infection”. Am Fam Physician. 107 (2): 165–172.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 Bardou M, Quenot JP, Barkun A (2015). “Stress-related mucosal disease in the critically ill patient”. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 12 (2): 98–107. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.235. PMID 25560847.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH, Marshall JC, Leasa D, Hall R, Winton TL, Rutledge F, Todd T, Roy P (1994). “Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients”. N Engl J Med. 330 (6): 377–81. doi:10.1056/NEJM199402103300601. PMID 8272140.
  18. ↑ Nakamura M, Haruma K, Kamada T, Mihara M, Yoshihara M, Imagawa M; et al. (2001). “Duodenogastric reflux is associated with antral metaplastic gastritis”. Gastrointest Endosc. 53 (1): 53–9. doi:10.1067/mge.2001.111385. PMID 11154489.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 Franke A, Teyssen S, Singer MV (2005). “Alcohol-related diseases of the esophagus and stomach”. Dig Dis. 23 (3–4): 204–13. doi:10.1159/000090167. PMID 16508284.
  20. ↑ Lee et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2017.
  21. ↑ Nakamura M, Haruma K, Kamada T, Mihara M, Yoshihara M, Sumioka M; et al. (2002). “Cigarette smoking promotes atrophic gastritis in Helicobacter pylori-positive subjects”. Dig Dis Sci. 47 (3): 675–81. PMID 11911358.
  22. ↑ “Exploring the interactions between Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection and other risk factors of gastric cancer: a pooled analysis in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project”. Int J Cancer. 149 (6): 1228–1238. 2021. doi:10.1002/ijc.33678. PMID 33990950 Check |pmid= value (help).
  23. ↑ Feyisa ZT, Woldeamanuel BT. PLoS One. 2021.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahad Hasan, M.D.[2] Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3]

Screening

Overview

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for gastritis

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for gastritis.

References

​​​​

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[2]

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Overview

Gastritis may be seen as a commonly occurring inflammatory disease in many individuals. Gastritis usually persists throughout life and the chance of spontaneous healing is rare. Gastritis is mostl associated with the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection. The gastric mucosa undergoes inflammation and may lead to atrophic gastritis. Chronic gastritis is a condition which is commonly observed as a manifestation of pathogenesis of many gastric disease conditions. Gastric secretory functions are usually impaired due to the gastric mucosa undergoing inflammation and atrophy. Increase in the prevalence of gastritis is attributed to the increasing age and the onset varies among different ethnicities. The increased risk of developing duodenal and peptic ulcers have been observed in individuals with persistent gastritis. Biopsies and routine evaluations may help predict the progression of gastritis to further conditions such as the peptic ulcer disease. Complications of Gastritis may include, peptic ulcers, gastrointestinal perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric polyp, anemia due to erosive gastritis, vitamin B12 deficiency, pernicious anemia, gastric outlet obstruction, increased risk of developing benign or malignant growths in the lining of the stomach which may lead to stomach cancer. Prognosis for gastritis is majorly dependent upon the type of gastritis and etiological factors. In Acute gastirtis, the condition improves upon refraining from risk factors such as NSAIDs, alcohol, cigarette smoking, acidic food, and beverages. In Autoimmune gastirtis, prognosis is usually good for vitamin B12 deficiency when treated with cyanocobalamin therapy. Although in Autoimmune gastritis, there is an increased risk for carcinoid tumors and gastric adenocarcinoma. In Chronic gastirtis associated with Helicobacter pylori infection, the prognosis is good. The triple therapy regimen may not be effective when compared to quadruple bismuth-based regimen is has proven to be very effective comparatively. In individuals with Helicobacter pylori infection associated chronic gastritis, if left untreated may progress to develop peptic ulcer disease, adenocarcinoma and MALT lymphoma.

Natural History

Gastritis is a common inflammatory disease. Gastritis usually persists throughout life and the chance of spontaneous healing is rare. Gastritis is most commonly associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. The gastric mucosa undergoes inflammatory changes which may finally lead to atrophic gastritis. Chronic gastritis is commonly observed as a manifestation of progression of many gastric conditions. Gastric secretory functions are usually impaired due to inflammation and atrophy of the gastric mucosa. Increase in the prevalence of gastritis is attributed to the increasing age and the onset varies among different ethnicities. The increased risk of developing duodenal and peptic ulcers have been observed in individuals with persistent gastritis. Biopsies and routine evaluations may help predict the progression of gastritis to the conditions such as the peptic ulcer disease. [1][2][3]

Complications

  • Stress Induced gastritis Complications:
    • Rarely, stress-induced gastritis may lead to severe bleeding that can prove fatal and leads to a life-threatening situation.

Prognosis

  • Prognosis for gastritis is majorly dependent upon the type of gastritis and etiological factors:
    • In Acute gastritis, the condition improves upon refraining from risk factors such as NSAIDs, alcohol, cigarette smoking, acidic food, and beverages. [4]
    • In Autoimmune gastritis, prognosis is usually good for vitamin B12 deficiency when treated with cyanocobalamin therapy. Although in autoimmune gastritis, there is an increased risk for carcinoid tumors and gastric adenocarcinoma. [5] [6]
    • In Chronic gastirtis associated with Helicobacter pylori infection, the prognosis is good.
      • The triple therapy regimen may not be effective when compared to quadruple bismuth-based regimen is has proven to be very effective comparatively. [7]
      • In individuals with Helicobacter pylori infection associated chronic gastritis, if left untreated may progress to develop peptic ulcer disease, adenocarcinoma and MALT lymphoma.

References

  1. ↑ Redéen S, Petersson F, Kechagias S, Mårdh E, Borch K (2010). “Natural history of chronic gastritis in a population-based cohort”. Scand J Gastroenterol. 45 (5): 540–9. doi:10.3109/00365521003624151. PMID 20180646.
  2. ↑ Sipponen P, Kekki M, Siurala M (1991). “The Sydney System: epidemiology and natural history of chronic gastritis”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 6 (3): 244–51. PMID 1912435.
  3. ↑ Sipponen P (1992). “Natural history of gastritis and its relationship to peptic ulcer disease”. Digestion. 51 Suppl 1: 70–5. PMID 1397747.
  4. ↑ Laine L, Curtis SP, Cryer B, Kaur A, Cannon CP (2010). “Risk factors for NSAID-associated upper GI clinical events in a long-term prospective study of 34 701 arthritis patients”. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 32 (10): 1240–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04465.x. PMID 20955443.
  5. ↑ Burkitt MD, Pritchard DM (2006). “Review article: Pathogenesis and management of gastric carcinoid tumours”. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 24 (9): 1305–20. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03130.x. PMID 17059512.
  6. ↑ Hsing AW, Hansson LE, McLaughlin JK, Nyren O, Blot WJ, Ekbom A; et al. (1993). “Pernicious anemia and subsequent cancer. A population-based cohort study”. Cancer. 71 (3): 745–50. PMID 8431855.
  7. ↑ Chey WD, Wong BC, Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2007). “American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection”. Am J Gastroenterol. 102 (8): 1808–25. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01393.x. PMID 17608775.

​

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[2]

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X Ray | CT | Endoscopy | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case#1

Related Chapters

Template:Gastroenterology

​​Home ​​​

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahad Hasan, M.D.[2] Aravind Reddy Kothagadi M.B.B.S[3]