Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Cirrhosis

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sudarshana Datta, MD [2]

Synonyms and keywords: Cirrhosis of liver; hepatic fibrosis; hepatic sclerosis

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sudarshana Datta, MD [2]

Overview

Cirrhosis is a consequence of chronic liver disease characterized by the replacement of liver tissue by fibrotic scar tissue as well as regenerative nodules, leading to progressive loss of liver function. The first description of the clinical picture and pathologic appearance of cirrhosis, was published in 1761. René Laennec coined the term “cirrhosis” in 1819. The word “cirrhosis” was derived from the Greek term kirrhos, meaning “tawny” (to describe the orange-yellow or tan color of the diseased liver). The pathological hallmark of cirrhosis is the development of scar tissue which leads to replacement of normal liver parenchyma, leading to blockade of portal blood flow and disturbance of normal liver function. When fibrosis of the liver reaches an advanced stage where distortion of the hepatic vasculature also occurs, it is termed as cirrhosis of the liver. The pathogenesis of cirrhosis involves inflammation, hepatic stellate cell activation, angiogenesis and fibrogenesis. Fibrosis eventually leads to formation of septae that grossly distort the liver architecture which includes both the liver parenchyma and the vasculature, accompanied by regenerative nodule formation.The most common cause of cirrhosis in the United States is Hepatitis C and chronic, heavy alcohol use, while the most common cause of cirrhosis worldwide and in Asian countries is the hepatitis virus. The devastating complications include complete liver failure or the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Other complications include portal hypertension, ascites, jaundice, itching, esophageal varices, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and cardiomyopathy. Prognosis depends on the causes, existing complications and a variety of factors which make the prediction of life expectancy questionable. Liver cirrhosis may present with non specific constitutional symptoms such as fever, anorexia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, menstrual irregularities and testicular atrophy. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis may develop complications and present with jaundice, increase in abdominal girth due to ascites, pruritus, hematochezia, melena and confusion due to hepatic encephalopathy. Patients with cirrhosis usually present with signs of jaundice, palmar erythema, spider angiomata, gynaecomastia and alteration of mental status arising due to complications of cirrhosis. Abdominal examination may show signs of abdominal distension, caput medusae, splenomegaly and flank dullness on percussion. On ultrasonography, changes in the liver contour and increased nodularity may be evident. The echo texture may appear coarse along with an increase in echogenecity from focal fatty changes and irregular appearing areas. USG may also be used to screen for hepatocellular carcinoma, portal hypertension and Budd-Chiari syndrome. The gold standard diagnostic test for cirrhosis in developing countries is liver biopsy, although it is rarely necessary for diagnosis or treatment. In developed countries, Fibroscan is fast replacing liver biopsy as the gold standard diagnostic modality. The change that cirrhosis causes to the liver is irreversible, therefore treatment is mostly centered on ameliorating the complications of cirrhosis such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, esophageal varices and hepatorenal syndrome. Chronic constitutional symptoms such as pruritus, hypogonadism, osteoporosis and anorexia must be treated in patients. Maintenance of adequate nutrition (especially protein intake) is extremely important in cirrhosis patients. The underlying cause of cirrhosis needs to be managed and the treatment varies depending upon the cause of cirrhosis. Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis are usually candidates for liver transplantation. Liver transplantation may be carried out based on MELD score and assessment of the patient’s quality of life, absence of contraindications and disease severity. In cases where transplantation is contraindicated, a patient may undergo the TIPS procedure. A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, also TIPS, is an artificial channel in the liver from the portal vein to a hepatic vein, created via the jugular vein. The main purpose of the TIPS procedure is to decompress the portal vein which would in turn help to prevent rebleeding from varices, and also prevent ascites formation. TIPS is used to treat portal hypertension which is often due to cirrhosis.

Historical Perspective

The first description of the clinical picture and pathologic appearance of cirrhosis, was published in 1761. René Laennec coined the term “cirrhosis” in 1819. The word “cirrhosis” was derived from the Greek term kirrhos, meaning “tawny” (to describe the orange-yellow or tan color of the diseased liver). In 1930, the first theory explaining the pathogenesis of cirrhosis was advanced by Roessle and terms such as parenchymal degeneration, regeneration and scarring were mentioned.

Classification

Cirrhosis of the liver may be classified using two methods: classification based on etiology, and classification based on morphology. Currently, classifying cirrhosis based on morphology is not used, as it requires an invasive procedure to examine the gross appearance of the liver, and it provides little diagnostic value. Classifying cirrhosis according to etiology is a more acceptable form of classification, as it may be attained through non-invasive laboratory testing, and has a higher diagnostic value.

Pathophysiology

Cirrhosis occurs due to long term liver injury which causes an imbalance between matrix production and degradation. The pathological hallmark of cirrhosis is the development of scar tissue which leads to replacement of normal liver parenchyma, leading to blockade of portal blood flow and disturbance of normal liver function. When fibrosis of the liver reaches an advanced stage where distortion of the hepatic vasculature also occurs, it is termed as cirrhosis of the liver. The pathogenesis of cirrhosis involves inflammation, hepatic stellate cell activation, angiogenesis and fibrogenesis. Kupffer cells are hepatic macrophages responsible for hepatic stellate cell activation during injury. Hepatic stellate cells (HSC) which are located in the subendothelial space of Disse, become activated in areas of liver injury and secrete TGF-β1, which leads to a fibrotic response and proliferation of connective tissue. Cirrhosis may also lead to hepatic microvascular changes including the formation of intra hepatic shunts (due to angiogenesis and loss of parenchymal cells) and endothelial dysfunction. Fibrosis eventually leads to formation of septae that grossly distort the liver architecture which includes both the liver parenchyma and the vasculature, accompanied by regenerative nodule formation.

Causes

There are a wide range of causes for cirrhosis, including alcohol abuse, genetic diseases, cardiac causes, toxins, viruses, and malnutrition. The consequence to the liver is the same in all cases with the functional liver tissue being replaced by fibrous scar tissue and regenerative nodules.

Differentiating Cirrhosis from other Diseases

Cirrhosis may present in a similar way to some other diseases. History, physical examination, and diagnostic testing may help to differentiate cirrhosis from other diseases such as malignancy, constrictive pericarditis, Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis and splenic vein thrombosis.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The most common cause of cirrhosis in the United States is Hepatitis C and chronic, heavy alcohol use, while the most common cause of cirrhosis worldwide and in Asian countries is the hepatitis virus. The gender that is most commonly affected by cirrhosis varies, depending on the underlying etiology. The incidence of cirrhosis increases with age; the median age of diagnosis of cirrhosis due to alcoholic liver disease is 52 years. The median age of diagnosis of cryptogenic/NAFLD/NASH cirrhosis is 60 years.

Risk Factors

Lifestyle and genetic risk factors play an important role in the development of cirrhosis in patients. Chronic alcohol use, chronic hepatitis B and C infection and genetic diseases such as cystic fibrosis are also significant risk factors for the development of cirrhosis.

Screening

Screening for HCC must be done in every cirrhotic patient. It is performed at a frequency of 6-12 months. Screening endoscopy for detection of esophageal varices must be performed at regular intervals in all patients.

Natural History, Prognosis and Complications

Cirrhosis is an irreversible process, the course of which is highly variable in patients. The natural history progresses in such a way that there is a lengthy stage of compensation, followed by the development of complications and sequelae as a result of the cirrhosis. The devastating complications include complete liver failure or the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Other complications include portal hypertension, ascites, jaundice, itching, esophageal varices, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and cardiomyopathy. Prognosis depends on the causes, existing complications and a variety of factors which make the prediction of life expectancy questionable. There are scores which classify disease severity and to determine suitability for liver transplantation in patients.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Liver biopsy is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of cirrhosis. The presence of bridging fibrous septa, parenchymal nodules bearing a mixture of replicating and sensecent hepatocytes and involvement of most or all of the liver are confirmatory of cirrhosis. Liver biopsy helps in confirmation of the diagnosis, determination of prognosis, underlying etiology, management of rejection subsequent to liver transplantation and evaluation of abnormal hepatic investigations. Sample of the liver may be obtained by Percutaneous, transjugular and laparoscopic radiographically- guided fine-needle approach. However, percutaneous liver biopsy is considered as the cornerstone of diagnosis.

History and Symptoms

Liver cirrhosis may present with non specific constitutional symptoms such as fever, anorexia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, menstrual irregularities and testicular atrophy. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis may develop complications and present with jaundice, increase in abdominal girth due to ascites, pruritus, hematochezia, melena and confusion due to hepatic encephalopathy. Symptoms may also vary depending upon the underlying cause of cirrhosis. A detailed history of alcohol use, blood transfusions, history of viral hepatitis and family history of liver disease must be taken in all patients.

Physical Examination

Patients with cirrhosis usually present with signs of jaundice, palmar erythema, spider angiomata, gynaecomastia and alteration of mental status arising due to complications of cirrhosis. Abdominal examination may show signs of abdominal distension, caput medusae, splenomegaly and flank dullness on percussion. Other findings on examination include nail changes, presence of Clubbing, dupuytren’s contracture(flexion deformities of the fingers) and Asterixis in cases with hepatic encephalopathy.

Laboratory Findings

A range of laboratory values may be obtained in the evaluation of cirrhosis, in order to determine disease severity and causation. Liver function tests, complete blood count, basic metabolic panel and coagulation factors are standard in the evaluation of cirrhosis. More specific testing for markers and serum enzymes may be performed when certain etiologies are suspected.

Imaging Findings

Electrocardiogram

In a few patients with cirrhosis, circulating toxins may cause the ECG to show prolongation of the QT interval. Low voltage complexes in the precordial leads may also be noticed in patients with fluid overload.

Chest X Ray

Chest x ray has a limited role in the diagnosis and management of cirrhosis, but can be helpful in identifying certain complications that can occur as a result of cirrhosis.

CT

Although CT scans are not routinely used in evaluation and diagnosis of cirrhosis, it may show the presence of lobar atrophic and hypertrophic changes in the liver, as well as ascites and varices in advanced disease. CT can also visualize the presence of tumors and blocked bile ducts, as well as evaluate the size of the liver.

MRI

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic test for cirrhosis is uncertain. MRI differentiates regenerating or dysplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma. MRI is best used as a follow-up study to determine whether lesions have changed in appearance and size. MRI may accurately diagnose cirrhosis and determines disease severity. Decreased signal intensity on MRI may also reveal an iron overload and provides an estimate of the hepatic iron concentration. MR angiography is more sensitive than ultrasonography in diagnosing complications of cirrhosis such as portal vein thrombosis.

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

On ultrasonography, changes in the liver contour and increased nodularity may be evident. The echo texture may appear coarse along with an increase in echogenecity from focal fatty changes and irregular appearing areas. USG may also be used to screen for hepatocellular carcinoma, portal hypertension and Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Other Imaging Findings

Tc-99m labeled sulfur may be used in nuclear imaging to provide some indication of hepatic function in cirrhotic patients. In candidates for liver transplant, CTA is used to asses the drainage of the liver. All patients with cirrhosis must undergo a diagnostic endoscopy for the evaluation of varices. Gastric endoscopy is an option if gastric varices are suspected, and endoscopic ultrasound may also help in the visualization of varices. ERCP is performed if a biliary pathology such as primary sclerosing cholangitis is suspected as the underlying cause of cirrhosis.

Other Diagnostic Studies

The gold standard diagnostic test for cirrhosis in developing countries is liver biopsy, although it is rarely necessary for diagnosis or treatment. In developed countries, Fibroscan is fast replacing liver biopsy as the gold standard diagnostic modality. NT-proBNP may be used to evaluate the complications of cirrhosis.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The change that cirrhosis causes to the liver is irreversible, therefore treatment is mostly centered on ameliorating the complications of cirrhosis such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, esophageal varices and hepatorenal syndrome. Chronic constitutional symptoms such as pruritus, hypogonadism, osteoporosis and anorexia must be treated in patients. Maintenance of adequate nutrition (especially protein intake) is extremely important in cirrhosis patients. The underlying cause of cirrhosis needs to be managed and the treatment varies depending upon the cause of cirrhosis.

Surgery

Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis are usually candidates for liver transplantation. Liver transplantation may be carried out based on MELD score and assessment of the patient’s quality of life, absence of contraindications and disease severity. In cases where transplantation is contraindicated, a patient may undergo the TIPS procedure. A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, also TIPS, is an artificial channel in the liver from the portal vein to a hepatic vein, created via the jugular vein. The main purpose of the TIPS procedure is to decompress the portal vein which would in turn help to prevent rebleeding from varices, and also prevent ascites formation. TIPS is used to treat portal hypertension which is often due to cirrhosis.

Prevention

Primary prevention of cirrhosis includes avoidance of causative agents such as alcohol, high doses of certain supplements (vitamin A, copper and iron) and vaccination against hepatitis. Adequate caloric intake, physical activity, prevention of high risk behaviors, screening of blood products and vaccination for Hepatitis B play an important role in primary prevention. Secondary prevention in patients with cirrhosis is aimed at preventing further damage to the liver. Avoidance of alcohol and other hepatotoxins, treatment of underlying chronic liver disease and immunization against viral hepatitis for susceptible patients are key measures of secondary prevention of cirrhosis.

References

Template:WH Template:WS

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sudarshana Datta, MD [2]

Overview

The first description of the clinical picture and pathologic appearance of cirrhosis, was published in 1761. René Laennec coined the term “cirrhosis” in 1819. The word “cirrhosis” was derived from the Greek term kirrhos, meaning “tawny” (to describe the orange-yellow or tan color of the diseased liver). In 1930, the first theory explaining the pathogenesis of cirrhosis was presented by Roessle and terms such as parenchymal degeneration, regeneration and scarring were mentioned.

Historical Perspective

Discovery

  • In 1761, the transformation of the liver in cirrhotic patients was identified by the first anatomic pathologist, Gianbattista Morgagni after conducting 500 autopsies.[1]
  • In 1819, René Laennec coined the term “cirrhosis“.[2]
  • The word “cirrhosis” was derived from the Greek term kirrhos, meaning “tawny” (to describe the orange-yellow or tan color of the diseased liver).[1]
  • In 1851, primary biliary cirrhosis was described by Addison and Gull at Guy’s Hospital Report, the title of the study being, “On a certain affectation of skin-vitiligoiedea-alpha plana-beta tuberosa”.

Landmark Events

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 “Liver Cirrhosis”.
  2. Roguin A. Rene Theophile Hyacinthe Laennec (1781-1826): the man behind the stethoscope. Clin Med Res 2006;4:230-5. PMID 17048358.
  3. Heathcote EJ (2003). “Primary biliary cirrhosis: historical perspective”. Clin Liver Dis. 7 (4): 735–40. PMID 14594128.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Charmaine Patel, M.D. [2]Sudarshana Datta, MD [3]

Overview

Cirrhosis of the liver may be classified using two classification methods based on etiology and morphology. Currently, classifying cirrhosis based on morphology is not recommended, as it requires an invasive procedure to examine the gross appearance of the liver, and provides little diagnostic value. Classifying cirrhosis according to etiology is a more acceptable form of classification, as it may be attained through non-invasive laboratory testing, and has a higher diagnostic value.

Classification Based On Etiology

Cirrhosis may be classified on the basis of etiology. This is the most widely accepted method of classification.

(a) Alcoholic cirrhosis

  • Most common cause of cirrhosis
  • Caused by continuous and prolonged alcohol abuse
  • According to American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), approximately 60-70 percent of all cases of cirrhosis are due to alcohol abuse

(b) Post-necrotic cirrhosis

(c) Biliary cirrhosis

(d) Cardiac cirrhosis

(e) Cirrhosis due to genetic disorders

(f) Cirrhosis due to malnutrition

Classification Based On Morphology

Cirrhosis has historically been classified based upon the nodular morphology that is seen on upon the gross appearance of the liver. Accurate assessment of the liver morphology can only be obtained through surgery, biopsy, or autopsy, therefore more recently, more non-invasive means of classifying and determining the causes of cirrhosis are used.

Micronodular Macronodular Mixed
Micronodular cirrhosis is characterized by nodules that are less than 3mm in diameter Macronodular cirrhosis is characterized by nodules that are more than 3mm in diameter Micronodular cirrhosis can often progress into macronodular cirrhosis. During this transformation, a mixed form of cirrhosis may be seen.[1]
Causes:

 Causes:

Mixed nodular cirrhosis is also seen in Indian childhood cirrhosis. [2]

Classification Based On Severity

  • Child-Pugh scoring system is used for predicting the risk of complications and severity of cirrhosis.
  • The Child-Pugh score employs five clinical measures of liver disease. Each measure is scored 1-3, with 3 indicating most severe derangement.
Measure 1 point 2 points 3 points units
Bilirubin (total) <34.2 (<2) 34.2-51.3 (2-3) >51.3 (>3) μmol/l (mg/dL)
Serum albumin >35 28-35 <28 g/L
INR <1.7 1.71-2.3 > 2.3 no unit
Ascites None Suppressed with medication Refractory no unit
Hepatic encephalopathy None Grade I-II (or suppressed with medication) Grade III-IV (or refractory) no unit
  • It should be noted that different textbooks and publications use different measures. Some older reference works substitute PT prolongation for INR.
  • If the PT is <4 seconds than control, it is assigned 1 point.
  • If the PT is 4-6 seconds over control, then it scores 2 points and if PT is >6 seconds over control, it scores 3 points.
  • In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), the bilirubin references are changed to reflect the fact that these diseases feature high conjugated bilirubin levels:
    • The upper limit for 1 point is 68 μmol/l (4 mg/dL) and the upper limit for 2 points is 170 μmol/l (10 mg/dL).

Interpretation

  • Chronic liver disease is classified into Child-Pugh class A to C:
Points Class One year survival Two year survival
5-6 A (Compensated cirrhosis) 100% 85%
7-9 B (Failing) 80% 60%
10-15 C (Decompensated cirrhosis) 45% 35%

References

  1. Fauerholdt L, Schlichting P, Christensen E, Poulsen H, Tygstrup N, Juhl E (1983). “Conversion of micronodular cirrhosis into macronodular cirrhosis”. Hepatology. 3 (6): 928–31. PMID 6629323.
  2. Nayak NC, Ramalingaswami V (1975). “Indian childhood cirrhosis”. Clin Gastroenterol. 4 (2): 333–49. PMID 47794.
  3. de Franchis R, Primignani M (1992). “Why do varices bleed?”. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America. 21 (1): 85–101. PMID 1568779. |access-date= requires |url= (help)

Template:WS Template:WH

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sudarshana Datta, MD [2] Alberto Castro Molina, M.D.

Overview

Cirrhosis occurs due to long term liver injury which causes an imbalance between matrix production and degradation. The pathological hallmark of cirrhosis is the development of scar tissue which leads to replacement of normal liver parenchyma, leading to blockade of portal blood flow and disturbance of normal liver function. When fibrosis of the liver reaches an advanced stage where distortion of the hepatic vasculature also occurs, it is termed as cirrhosis of the liver. The pathogenesis of cirrhosis involves inflammation, hepatic stellate cell activation, angiogenesis, and fibrogenesis. Kupffer cells are hepatic macrophages responsible for hepatic stellate cell activation during injury. Hepatic stellate cells (HSC) which are located in the subendothelial space of Disse, become activated in areas of liver injury and secrete transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), which leads to a fibrotic response and proliferation of connective tissue. Cirrhosis may also lead to hepatic microvascular changes including the formation of intra-hepatic shunts (due to angiogenesis and loss of parenchymal cells) and endothelial dysfunction. Fibrosis eventually leads to formation of septae that grossly distort the liver architecture which includes both the liver parenchyma and the vasculature, accompanied by regenerative nodule formation. HAYOP

Pathophysiology

The pathogenesis of cirrhosis is as follows:[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Hepatic stellate cell activation

The role of hepatic stellate cells in the pathogenesis of cirrhosis is described below:

Microvascular changes

Cirrhosis leads to hepatic microvascular changes characterised by:[9]

Angiogenesis

Fibrosis

The role of fibrosis in the pathogenesis of cirrhosis is described below:

Pathogenesis of cirrhosis according to cause

Pathogenesis of cirrhosis based upon the underlying cause is as follows:

Pathophysiology of Cirrhosis due to Alcohol

Mechanisms of alcohol-induced liver damage include:[18][19][20][21]

Pathophysiology of Portal Hypertension due to Cirrhosis

Increased resistance

Hyperdynamic circulation in portal hypertension

Acute kidney injury in cirrhosis

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of decompensated cirrhosis and is strongly associated with short term morbidity and mortality.[38][39]

Definitions and classification

  • The International Club of Ascites (ICA) defines AKI in cirrhosis as an increase in serum creatinine of at least 0.3 mg per deciliter within 48 hours, or an increase of at least 50 percent from baseline within 7 days.[40]
  • ICA AKI staging is commonly used to risk stratify patients (stage 1, 2, and 3), and progression in stage is associated with worse outcomes.[40]
  • The major etiologies of AKI in cirrhosis include hypovolemia related (including overdiuresis or gastrointestinal bleeding), infection associated AKI, Acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and Hepatorenal syndrome AKI (HRS AKI); postrenal obstruction is uncommon but should be excluded when clinically suspected.[38][41]

Hepatorenal syndrome AKI

  • HRS reflects functional kidney failure related to advanced cirrhosis and severe circulatory dysfunction, traditionally explained by marked splanchnic vasodilation with neurohormonal activation and renal vasoconstriction.[42][43]
  • ICA diagnostic criteria for HRS AKI include cirrhosis with ascites and AKI, no response after 2 consecutive days of diuretic withdrawal plus plasma volume expansion with albumin (1 g per kg per day, up to 100 g per day), absence of shock, no current or recent nephrotoxic drugs, and no evidence of structural kidney disease (for example, significant proteinuria, marked hematuria, or abnormal kidney ultrasonography).[40][43]
  • AKI in cirrhosis frequently has mixed mechanisms, and careful reassessment for infection, hypovolemia, and ATN is essential even when HRS AKI is suspected.[38]

Common precipitants and triggers

Common precipitants include bacterial infections (including spontaneous bacterial peritonitis), large volume paracentesis without adequate albumin replacement, gastrointestinal bleeding, excessive diuresis, diarrhea or poor oral intake, and exposure to nephrotoxic agents such as NSAIDs or iodinated contrast.[38][44]

Diagnostic approach

  • Initial evaluation focuses on identifying reversible causes, assessing intravascular volume, ruling out shock, and promptly diagnosing and treating infection.[38][40]
  • Suggested tests include serum chemistries, urinalysis and urine sediment microscopy, urine protein quantification when indicated, and kidney ultrasonography if obstruction or intrinsic renal disease is a concern.[38][45]
  • Traditional urine indices such as urine sodium and fractional excretion of sodium may have limited discriminatory value in cirrhosis, particularly with diuretic exposure; urine sediment and clinical context remain important.[38]
  • Urinary biomarkers (for example NGAL) may help distinguish ATN from functional causes of AKI and provide prognostic information, but availability and standardized thresholds vary across settings.[46][47][48]

Management

  • Management begins with rapid identification and treatment of precipitants (especially infection), stopping nephrotoxins, holding or reducing diuretics when appropriate, and assessing volume status.[38][40]
  • Plasma volume expansion with intravenous albumin is commonly used early (including for suspected hypovolemia and as part of the diagnostic algorithm for HRS AKI). A common approach is albumin 1 g per kg per day (up to 100 g per day) for 2 days, with reassessment of creatinine and hemodynamics.[40][43]
  • If AKI persists or progresses and HRS AKI is diagnosed, vasoconstrictor therapy plus albumin is recommended to improve kidney function and bridge eligible patients to liver transplantation.[38][43]

Vasoconstrictor therapy for HRS AKI

  • Terlipressin plus albumin is a commonly recommended first line regimen where available; randomized trials have shown higher rates of HRS reversal compared with placebo, though careful monitoring is required due to adverse events including ischemic complications and respiratory failure in higher risk patients.[49][50]
  • Norepinephrine plus albumin is an alternative option, typically used in an ICU setting, with trials and meta analyses suggesting similar efficacy to terlipressin in some settings.[51][52]
  • Midodrine plus octreotide with albumin has been used in some centers, particularly outside the ICU, but may be less effective than terlipressin or norepinephrine based on comparative studies.[53]

Kidney replacement therapy and transplantation

  • Dialysis may be needed for standard indications (refractory hyperkalemia, severe acidosis, volume overload, uremic complications) and is often used as a bridge to transplantation in selected patients.[38][45]
  • Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for HRS AKI; the likelihood of renal recovery after transplant depends on the duration and severity of kidney dysfunction and the presence of structural kidney injury such as ATN.[38][54]
  • Guidance documents provide criteria for considering simultaneous liver kidney transplantation in carefully selected patients with sustained and severe renal dysfunction.[55]

Prevention

  • Prevention strategies include avoiding nephrotoxins (especially NSAIDs), careful titration of diuretics, prompt treatment of infections, and albumin administration after large volume paracentesis to reduce circulatory dysfunction and AKI risk.[38][56]
  • In spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, adjunctive albumin reduces the risk of renal failure and improves survival in selected patients, and prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for high risk populations per guideline based approaches.[57][55]
  • Patients with cirrhosis and AKI benefit from early nephrology and hepatology involvement, and early transplant evaluation should be considered when appropriate.[38]

Genetics

Gross Pathology

On gross examination, the liver may initially be enlarged, but with progression of the disease, it becomes smaller. Its surface is irregular, the consistency is firm, and the color is often yellow (if associates steatosis). Depending on the size of the nodules there are three macroscopic types: micronodular, macronodular and mixed cirrhosis.

  • In the micronodular form (Laennec‘s cirrhosis or portal cirrhosis) regenerating nodules are under 3 mm.
  • In macronodular cirrhosis (post-necrotic cirrhosis), the nodules are larger than 3 mm.
  • The mixed cirrhosis consists of a variety of nodules with different sizes.

On gross pathology, cirrhotic liver, splenomegaly, and esophageal varices are characteristic findings in portal hypertension.

Cirrhosis

On gross pathology there are two types of cirrhosis:

Micronodular cirrhosis – By Amadalvarez (Own work), via Wikimedia Commons[61]
Macronodular cirrhosis[62]

Splenomegaly

On gross pathology, diffuse enlargement and congestion of the spleen are characteristic findings of splenomegaly.

Splenomegaly – By Amadalvarez (Own work), via Wikimedia Commons[63]

Esophageal Varices

On gross pathology, prominent, congested, and tortoise veins in the lower parts of esophagus are characteristic findings of esophageal varices.

Esophageal varices[64]

Images of gross pathology of cirrhosis

Images courtesy of Professor Peter Anderson DVM PhD and published with permission © PEIR, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Pathology

Microscopic Pathology

  • Microscopic pathology reveals the four stages of cirrhosis as it progresses:
    • Chronic nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis: inflammation and necrosis of portal tracts with lymphocyte infiltration leads to the destruction of the bile ducts
    • Development of biliary stasis and fibrosis
    • Periportal fibrosis progresses to bridging fibrosis
    • Increased proliferation of smaller bile ductules leads to regenerative nodule formation
  • Microscopically, cirrhosis is characterized by regeneration nodules surrounded by fibrous septa.
  • In these nodules, regenerating hepatocytes are present.
  • Portal tracts, central veins and the radial pattern of hepatocytes are absent.
  • Fibrous septa are present and inflammatory infiltrate composed of lymphocytes and macrophages) are also visible.
  • If the underlying cause is secondary biliary cirrhosis, biliary ducts are damaged, proliferated or distended leading to bile stasis.
  • Dilated ducts contain inspissated bile which appears as bile casts or bile thrombi (brown-green, amorphous).
  • Bile retention may be found also in the parenchyma and are referred to as “bile lakes”.[65]

Microscopic pathology

The main microscopic histopathological findings in portal hypertension are related to cirrhosis, esophageal varices, hepatic amyloidosis, and congestive hepatopathy due to heart failure or Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Cirrhosis

Robbins definition of microscopic histopathological findings in cirrhosis includes (all three is needed for diagnosis):[66]

Cirrhosis with bridging fibrosis (yellow arrow) and nodule (black arrow) – By Nephron, via Librepathology.org[67]

Esophageal varices

The main microscopic histopathological findings in esophageal varices are:

Esophageal varices with submucosal vein (black arrow), via Librepathology.org[68]

Hepatic amyloidosis

The main microscopic histopathological findings in hepatic amyloidosis is amorphous extracellular pink stuff on H&E staining.

Hepatic amyloidosis with amorphous amyloids (black arrow) and normal hepatocytes (blue arrow), via Librepathology.org[69]

Congestive hepatopathy

The main microscopic histopathological findings in congestive hepatopathy (due to heart failure or Budd-Chiari syndrome) are:

Congestive hepatopathy with central vein (yellow arrowhead), inflammatory cells, Councilman body (green arrowhead), and hepatocyte with mitotic figure (red arrowhead), via Librepathology.org[70]

Videos

{{#ev:youtube|CzKGvWZrUpU}}

{{#ev:youtube|CV8OYeIUXko}}

{{#ev:youtube|Jj8ozr_IttM}}

References

  1. Arthur MJ, Iredale JP (1994). “Hepatic lipocytes, TIMP-1 and liver fibrosis”. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 28 (3): 200–8. PMID 7932316.
  2. Friedman SL (1993). “Seminars in medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. The cellular basis of hepatic fibrosis. Mechanisms and treatment strategies”. N. Engl. J. Med. 328 (25): 1828–35. doi:10.1056/NEJM199306243282508. PMID 8502273.
  3. Iredale JP (1996). “Matrix turnover in fibrogenesis”. Hepatogastroenterology. 43 (7): 56–71. PMID 8682489.
  4. Gressner AM (1994). “Perisinusoidal lipocytes and fibrogenesis”. Gut. 35 (10): 1331–3. PMC 1374996. PMID 7959178.
  5. Iredale JP (2007). “Models of liver fibrosis: exploring the dynamic nature of inflammation and repair in a solid organ”. J. Clin. Invest. 117 (3): 539–48. doi:10.1172/JCI30542. PMC 1804370. PMID 17332881.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Arthur MJ (2002). “Reversibility of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis following treatment for hepatitis C”. Gastroenterology. 122 (5): 1525–8. PMID 11984538.
  7. Wanless IR, Wong F, Blendis LM, Greig P, Heathcote EJ, Levy G (1995). “Hepatic and portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: possible role in development of parenchymal extinction and portal hypertension”. Hepatology. 21 (5): 1238–47. PMID 7737629.
  8. Iredale JP. Cirrhosis: new research provides a basis for rational and targeted treatments. BMJ 2003;327:143-7.Fulltext. PMID 12869458.
  9. Fernández M, Semela D, Bruix J, Colle I, Pinzani M, Bosch J (2009). “Angiogenesis in liver disease”. J. Hepatol. 50 (3): 604–20. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.12.011. PMID 19157625.
  10. Maher JJ, McGuire RF (1990). “Extracellular matrix gene expression increases preferentially in rat lipocytes and sinusoidal endothelial cells during hepatic fibrosis in vivo”. J. Clin. Invest. 86 (5): 1641–8. doi:10.1172/JCI114886. PMC 296914. PMID 2243137. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  11. Herbst H, Frey A, Heinrichs O; et al. (1997). “Heterogeneity of liver cells expressing procollagen types I and IV in vivo”. Histochem. Cell Biol. 107 (5): 399–409. PMID 9208331. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. García-Pagán JC, Gracia-Sancho J, Bosch J (2012). “Functional aspects on the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in cirrhosis”. J. Hepatol. 57 (2): 458–61. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2012.03.007. PMID 22504334.
  13. Lee JS, Semela D, Iredale J, Shah VH (2007). “Sinusoidal remodeling and angiogenesis: a new function for the liver-specific pericyte?”. Hepatology. 45 (3): 817–25. doi:10.1002/hep.21564. PMID 17326208. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  14. Rosmorduc O, Housset C (2010). “Hypoxia: a link between fibrogenesis, angiogenesis, and carcinogenesis in liver disease”. Semin. Liver Dis. 30 (3): 258–70. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1255355. PMID 20665378. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  15. Schuppan D, Afdhal NH (2008). “Liver cirrhosis”. Lancet. 371 (9615): 838–51. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60383-9. PMC 2271178. PMID 18328931.
  16. Desmet VJ, Roskams T (2004). “Cirrhosis reversal: a duel between dogma and myth”. J. Hepatol. 40 (5): 860–7. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2004.03.007. PMID 15094237.
  17. Wanless IR, Nakashima E, Sherman M (2000). “Regression of human cirrhosis. Morphologic features and the genesis of incomplete septal cirrhosis”. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 124 (11): 1599–607. doi:10.1043/0003-9985(2000)124<1599:ROHC>2.0.CO;2. PMID 11079009.
  18. Ceni E, Mello T, Galli A (2014). “Pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease: role of oxidative metabolism”. World J. Gastroenterol. 20 (47): 17756–72. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17756. PMC 4273126. PMID 25548474.
  19. You M, Crabb DW (2004). “Recent advances in alcoholic liver disease II. Minireview: molecular mechanisms of alcoholic fatty liver”. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 287 (1): G1–6. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00056.2004. PMID 15194557.
  20. Freeman TL, Tuma DJ, Thiele GM, Klassen LW, Worrall S, Niemelä O, Parkkila S, Emery PW, Preedy VR (2005). “Recent advances in alcohol-induced adduct formation”. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 29 (7): 1310–6. PMID 16088993.
  21. Niemelä O (2007). “Acetaldehyde adducts in circulation”. Novartis Found. Symp. 285: 183–92, discussion 193–7. PMID 17590995.
  22. Fischer M, You M, Matsumoto M, Crabb DW (2003). “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) agonist treatment reverses PPARalpha dysfunction and abnormalities in hepatic lipid metabolism in ethanol-fed mice”. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (30): 27997–8004. doi:10.1074/jbc.M302140200. PMID 12791698.
  23. You M, Matsumoto M, Pacold CM, Cho WK, Crabb DW (2004). “The role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the action of ethanol in the liver”. Gastroenterology. 127 (6): 1798–808. PMID 15578517.
  24. Ji C, Chan C, Kaplowitz N (2006). “Predominant role of sterol response element binding proteins (SREBP) lipogenic pathways in hepatic steatosis in the murine intragastric ethanol feeding model”. J. Hepatol. 45 (5): 717–24. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2006.05.009. PMID 16879892.
  25. Greenway CV, Stark RD (1971). “Hepatic vascular bed”. Physiol. Rev. 51 (1): 23–65. PMID 5543903.
  26. Schiff, Eugene (2012). Schiff’s diseases of the liver. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780470654682.
  27. SCHAFFNER F, POPER H (1963). “Capillarization of hepatic sinusoids in man”. Gastroenterology. 44: 239–42. PMID 13976646.
  28. Reynolds TB, Hidemura R, Michel H, Peters R (1969). “Portal hypertension without cirrhosis in alcoholic liver disease”. Ann. Intern. Med. 70 (3): 497–506. PMID 5775031.
  29. Rubanyi GM (1991). “Endothelium-derived relaxing and contracting factors”. J. Cell. Biochem. 46 (1): 27–36. doi:10.1002/jcb.240460106. PMID 1874796.
  30. Epstein, Franklin H.; Vane, John R.; Änggård, Erik E.; Botting, Regina M. (1990). “Regulatory Functions of the Vascular Endothelium”. New England Journal of Medicine. 323 (1): 27–36. doi:10.1056/NEJM199007053230106. ISSN 0028-4793.
  31. Rockey DC, Weisiger RA (1996). “Endothelin induced contractility of stellate cells from normal and cirrhotic rat liver: implications for regulation of portal pressure and resistance”. Hepatology. 24 (1): 233–40. doi:10.1002/hep.510240137. PMID 8707268.
  32. Mosca P, Lee FY, Kaumann AJ, Groszmann RJ (1992). “Pharmacology of portal-systemic collaterals in portal hypertensive rats: role of endothelium”. Am. J. Physiol. 263 (4 Pt 1): G544–50. PMID 1415713.
  33. Colombato LA, Albillos A, Groszmann RJ (1992). “Temporal relationship of peripheral vasodilatation, plasma volume expansion and the hyperdynamic circulatory state in portal-hypertensive rats”. Hepatology. 15 (2): 323–8. PMID 1735537.
  34. Genecin P, Polio J, Colombato LA, Ferraioli G, Reuben A, Groszmann RJ (1990). “Bile acids do not mediate the hyperdynamic circulation in portal hypertensive rats”. Am. J. Physiol. 259 (1 Pt 1): G21–5. PMID 2372062.
  35. Casadevall, María; Panés, Julián; Piqué, Josep M.; Marroni, Norma; Bosch, Jaume; Whittle, Brendan J. R. (1993). “Involvement of nitric oxide and prostaglandins in gastric mucosal hyperemia of portal-hypertensive anesthetized rats”. Hepatology. 18 (3): 628–634. doi:10.1002/hep.1840180323. ISSN 0270-9139.
  36. Sieber CC, Groszmann RJ (1992). “In vitro hyporeactivity to methoxamine in portal hypertensive rats: reversal by nitric oxide blockade”. Am. J. Physiol. 262 (6 Pt 1): G996–1001. PMID 1616049.
  37. Albillos A, Colombato LA, Lee FY, Groszmann RJ (1993). “Octreotide ameliorates vasodilatation and Na+ retention in portal hypertensive rats”. Gastroenterology. 104 (2): 575–9. PMID 8425700.
  38. 38.00 38.01 38.02 38.03 38.04 38.05 38.06 38.07 38.08 38.09 38.10 38.11 38.12 Nadim MK, Garcia-Tsao G (2023). “Acute Kidney Injury in Cirrhosis”. N Engl J Med. 388: 733–745. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2215289.
  39. Belcher JM, Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, et al. (2013). “Association of AKI with mortality and complications in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis”. Hepatology. 57: 753–762.
  40. 40.0 40.1 40.2 40.3 40.4 40.5 Angeli P, Ginès P, Wong F, et al. (2015). “Diagnosis and management of acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: revised consensus recommendations of the International Club of Ascites”. J Hepatol. 62: 968–974.
  41. Piano S, Rosi S, Maresio G, et al. (2013). “Evaluation of the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites”. J Hepatol. 59: 482–489.
  42. Schrier RW, Arroyo V, Bernardi M, Epstein M, Henriksen JH, Rodés J (1988). “Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: a proposal for the initiation of renal sodium and water retention in cirrhosis”. Hepatology. 8: 1151–1157.
  43. 43.0 43.1 43.2 43.3 Angeli P, Gines P, Wong F, et al. (2019). “Hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis: updated definition and management recommendations”. J Hepatol. 71: 811–822.
  44. Salerno F, Gerbes A, Ginès P, Wong F, Arroyo V (2007). “Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis”. Gut. 56: 1310–1318.
  45. 45.0 45.1 Francoz C, Durand F, Kahn JA, Genyk YS, Nadim MK (2019). “Hepatorenal syndrome”. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 14: 774–781.
  46. Belcher JM, Sanyal AJ, Peixoto AJ, et al. (2014). “Kidney biomarkers and differential diagnosis of patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury”. Hepatology. 60: 622–632.
  47. Allegretti AS, Parada XV, Endres P, et al. (2021). “Urinary NGAL as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for acute kidney injury in cirrhosis: a prospective study”. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 12 (5).
  48. Francoz C, Nadim MK, Durand F (2016). “Kidney biomarkers in cirrhosis”. J Hepatol. 65: 809–824.
  49. Wong F, Pappas SC, Curry MP, et al. (2021). “Terlipressin plus albumin for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome”. N Engl J Med. 384: 818–828.
  50. Solà E, et al. (2022). “Factors associated with respiratory failure during terlipressin therapy in hepatorenal syndrome”. Hepatology.
  51. Sharma P, et al. (2008). “Norepinephrine vs terlipressin in hepatorenal syndrome: randomized study”. J Hepatol.
  52. Nassar Junior AP, Farias AQ, d’ Albuquerque LA, Carrilho FJ, Malbouisson LM (2014). “Terlipressin versus norepinephrine in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. PLoS One. 9 (9).
  53. Cavallin M, Kamath PS, Merli M, et al. (2015). “Terlipressin plus albumin versus midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: a randomized trial”. Hepatology. 62: 567–574.
  54. Nadim MK, Sung RS, Davis CL, et al. (2012). “Impact of the etiology of acute kidney injury on outcomes following liver transplantation: acute tubular necrosis vs hepatorenal syndrome”. Liver Transpl. 18: 539–548.
  55. 55.0 55.1 Biggins SW, Angeli P, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. (2021). “Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome”. Hepatology. 74: 1014–1048.
  56. Bernardi M, Caraceni P, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM (2012). “Albumin infusion in patients undergoing large-volume paracentesis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials”. Hepatology. 55: 1172–1181.
  57. Sort P, Navasa M, Arroyo V, et al. (1999). “Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis”. N Engl J Med. 341: 403–409.
  58. Calado RT, Brudno J, Mehta P; et al. (2011). “Constitutional telomerase mutations are genetic risk factors for cirrhosis”. Hepatology. 53 (5): 1600–7. doi:10.1002/hep.24173. PMC 3082730. PMID 21520173. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  59. Freed EF, Prieto JL, McCann KL, McStay B, Baserga SJ (2012). “NOL11, Implicated in the Pathogenesis of North American Indian Childhood Cirrhosis, Is Required for Pre-rRNA Transcription and Processing”. PLoS Genet. 8 (8): e1002892. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002892. PMC 3420923. PMID 22916032. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  60. Freed EF, Baserga SJ (2010). “The C-terminus of Utp4, mutated in childhood cirrhosis, is essential for ribosome biogenesis”. Nucleic Acids Res. 38 (14): 4798–806. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq185. PMC 2919705. PMID 20385600. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  61. <CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)>
  62. “www.meddean.luc.edu”.
  63. Amadalvarez – Own work, <“https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0” title=”Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0″>CC BY-SA 4.0, <“https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=49669333“>Link
  64. <http://wellcomeimages.org/indexplus/obf_images/29/b4/13f38971164f946a97f9d32ddd93.jpg>Gallery: <“http://wellcomeimages.org/indexplus/image/L0074357.html“><“http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0> CC BY 4.0, <“https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=36297209“>
  65. Pathology atlas, “cirrhosis”.
  66. Mitchell, Richard (2012). Pocket companion to Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 978-1416054542.
  67. “File:Cirrhosis high mag.jpg – Libre Pathology”.
  68. “Esophageal varices – Libre Pathology”.
  69. “File:Hepatic amyloidosis – high mag.jpg – Libre Pathology”.
  70. “File:2 CEN NEC 1 680x512px.tif – Libre Pathology”.
Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Sudarshana Datta, MD [3]

Overview

There are a wide range of causes for cirrhosis, including alcohol abuse, genetic diseases, cardiac causes, toxins, viruses, and malnutrition. The consequence is the same in all cases with the functional liver tissue being replaced by fibrous scar tissue and regenerative nodules.

Causes

Common causes

Cirrhosis has many possible causes; sometimes more than one cause is present in the same patient. In the Western World, chronic alcoholism and hepatitis C are the most common causes. Hepatitis B is more common in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.

Causes by Organ System

Cardiovascular Cardiac cirrhosis, Right sided cardiac failure, Constrictive pericarditis, Cor Pulmonale, Tricuspid insufficiency
Chemical / poisoning Aflatoxin
Dermatologic Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome, Addison-Gull syndrome , Reynolds syndrome , Tricho-hepato-enteric syndrome
Drug Side Effect Amiodarone, Ethanol, interferon alfacon-1, Isoniazid, Methotrexate, Methyldopa, Sulfasalazine
Ear Nose Throat No underlying causes
Endocrine No underlying causes
Environmental No underlying causes
Gastroenterologic Addison-Gull syndrome , Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency , Alström syndrome, Autoimmune cholangiopathy, Autoimmune hepatitis, Bearn-Kunkel syndrome , Bile duct stricture, Biliary atresia, Budd-Chiari Syndrome, Caroli disease, Cerebrohepatorenal syndrome, Ceroid storage disease, Cholestasis-oedema syndrome, Norwegian type, Cruveilhier-Baumgarten syndrome, Congenital hepatic fibrosis, Cystic fibrosis, Granulomatous cirrhosis, Hemochromatosis, Hepatic vein thrombosis, Hereditary fructose intolerance, Indian familial childhood cirrhosis, Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis , Primary biliary cirrhosis, Primary sclerosing cholangitis, Reynolds syndrome , Tricho-hepato-enteric syndrome , Wilson disease
Genetic Abetalipoproteinemia, Alagille syndrome, Alpers disease, Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency , Alström syndrome, Berardinelli lipodystrophy syndrome, Carbohydrate deficient glycoprotein syndrome type 1a, Carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type 1b, Caroli disease, Ceroid storage disease , Cholestasis-oedema syndrome, Norwegian type, Congenital hepatic fibrosis, Cystic fibrosis, Fanconi disease, Fructose-1-phosphate aldolase deficiency, Galactosemia, Glycogen storage disease type IV, Haemosiderosis, Hemochromatosis, Hereditary fructose intolerance, Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome, autosomal recessive, Polycystic kidney disease, autosomal recessive, Porphyria cutanea tarda type 2 (familial), Sickle cell disease, Tyrosinaemia type 1, Wilson disease
Hematologic Budd-Chiari Syndrome, Erythropoietic protoporphyria, Fanconi disease, Haemosiderosis, Hepatic vein thrombosis, Porphyria cutanea tarda type 2 (familial), Sickle cell disease, Thalassemia, Tyrosinaemia type 1
Iatrogenic Bile duct stricture, Graft versus host disease, Parenteral nutrition
Infectious Disease Fasciola hepatica, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Schistosoma haematobium, Schistosoma japonicum, Schistosoma mansoni, Visceral leishmaniasis
Musculoskeletal / Ortho No underlying causes
Neurologic Alpers disease, Cerebrohepatorenal syndrome, Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome, autosomal recessive
Nutritional / Metabolic Abetalipoproteinemia, Carbohydrate deficient glycoprotein syndrome type 1a, Carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type 1b, Ceroid storage disease , Cholesterol ester storage disease, Fructose-1-phosphate aldolase deficiency, Galactosemia, Glycogen storage disease type IV, Hypervitaminosis A, Parenteral nutrition
Obstetric/Gynecologic No underlying causes
Oncologic No underlying causes
Opthalmologic Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome, autosomal recessive
Overdose / Toxicity Acetaminophen overdose
Psychiatric No underlying causes
Pulmonary No underlying causes
Renal / Electrolyte Cerebrohepatorenal syndrome, Fanconi disease, Polycystic kidney disease, autosomal recessive
Rheum / Immune / Allergy Autoimmune cholangiopathy, Autoimmune hepatitis, Graft versus host disease, Primary biliary cirrhosis, Primary sclerosing cholangitis, Reynolds syndrome , Sarcoidosis
Sexual No underlying causes
Trauma No underlying causes
Urologic No underlying causes
Dental No underlying causes
Miscellaneous Alcoholic liver disease

Causes in Alphabetical Order [1] [2]

Differentiating Different Causes of Cirrhosis

Differential Diagnosis Useful Findings
Alcoholic cirrhosis History EtOH, AST/ALT > 2
Chronic Hepatits C Virus (HCV) HCV AB
Primary Biliary Cirrhosis (PBC) Elevated alk phos, AMA+
Primary sclerosing cholangitis History inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ANA or ASMA or P-ANCA+
Autoimmune hepatitis Hypergammaglobulinemia, ANA/ASMA +
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus HBsAg+, HBeAg may be +
Hemochromatosis Family history+, Fe/TIBC and ferritin elevated
Wilson’s disease Family history+, young age, low ceruloplasmin
Alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency Family history+, young age, low serum AAT

References

  1. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:77 ISBN 1591032016
  2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:68 ISBN 140510368X
  3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1813854/#reference-sec
  4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2165837/
  5. http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/hereditary-fructose-intolerance
  6. http://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/GARD/Condition/4697/Reynolds_syndrome.aspx
  7. http://www.checkorphan.org/disease/tricho-hepato-enteric-syndrome

Template:WS Template:WH

Differentiating Cirrhosis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sudarshana Datta, MD [2]

Overview

Cirrhosis may present in a similar way to some other diseases. History, physical examination, and diagnostic testing may help in differentiating cirrhosis from other diseases such as malignancy, constrictive pericarditis, Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis and splenic vein thrombosis.

Differentiating Cirrhosis From Other Diseases

Differential diagnosis of jaundice

Differential diagnosis of jaundice are enlisted in the table below:[1][2][3][4][5]

Classification of jaundice based on etiology Disease History and clinical manifestations Diagnosis
Lab Findings Other blood tests Other diagnostic
Family history Fever Right upper quadrant (RUQ) Pain Pruritis Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ALK Bilirubin (Indirect) Bilirubin (Direct) Viral serology
Jaundice Hepatocellular Jaundice Liver infiltration: Hemochromatosis, amyloidosis + -/+ ↑/N ↑/N N Ferritin ↑ in hemochromatosis Liver biopsy
Wilson’s disease + -/+ N ↑/N N Serum ceruloplasmin Liver biopsy
Viral hepatitis -/+ N ↑/N N + Specific viral antibody for each type
Alcoholic hepatitis -/+ -/+ ↑↑ N ↑/N N
Drug induced hepatitis -/+ N ↑/N N
Autoimmune hepatitis -/+ -/+ N ↑/N N Anti-LKM antibody Liver biopsy
Cirrhosis -/+ -/+ -/+ ↑/N ↑/N ↑/N -/+ Low platelet count Small liver on ultrasound
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis -/+ N ↑/N N High lipids Liver biopsy
Ischemic hepatopathy -/+ -/+ N ↑/N N Cardiovascular risk factors Clinical setting
Cholestatic Jaundice Common bile duct stone -/+ + + N N N Dilated ducts on sonography CT scan/ERCP
Hepatitis A (cholestatic type) -/+ + + N N N + Anti-HAV antibody Abdominal ultrasound
EBV / CMV hepatitis -/+ + + N N N + Positive serology
Primary biliary cirrhosis -/+ -/+ + N/↑ N/↑ N Antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) positive Liver biopsy
Primary sclerosing cholangitis -/+ -/+ + N/↑ N/↑ N Positive autoantibodies (p-ANCA) Beading on MRCP,

Liver biopsy

Sickle cell disease + +/- N/↑ N/↑ N Genetic testing
Pancreatic carcinoma + -/+ -/+ N/↑ N/↑ N CT scan for diagnosis
AIDS cholangiopathy -/+ -/+ N/↑ N/↑ N Positive HIV Sonography or ERCP for diagnosis
Parasite induces cholestasis -/+ -/+ N/↑ N/↑ N Antibodies or parasite serology Sonography or ERCP for diagnosis
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy -/+ -/+ + N Low platelets, Negative viral serology Diagnosed clinically
Isolated Jaundice Crigler-Najjar type 2 + N N N Genetic testing
Gilbert syndrome + N N N Genetic testing
Rotor syndrome + N N N N Genetic testing Liver biopsy
Dubin-Johnson syndrome + N N N N Genetic testing Liver biopsy
Hereditary spherocytosis + -/+ N N N N Genetic testing Osmotic fragility
Glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency + N N N N Genetic testing
Thalassemia + N N N N Genetic testing
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) N N N N Flow cytometery
Immune hemolysis -/+ N N N N Autoantibodies
Hematoma -/+ N N N N Anemia Trauma or surgery in history

Differentiating cirrhosis from other diseases based on serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG)

Cirrhosis must be differentiated from other causes of abnormal liver function tests, altered liver architecture and size:

Condition Differentiating signs and symptoms Differentiating Tests
Cirrhosis

Ultrasound findings in cirrhosis are as follows:[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]

Abdominal MRI may also be helpful in the diagnosis of portal hypertension. Findings on MRI suggestive of cirrhosis with portal hypertension include:[14][15][16][17]

Transient elastography and the Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) technique are well-established methods for the staging of fibrosis in various liver diseases: [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] 

  • The FibroScan (transient elastography) uses elastic waves to determine liver stiffness which theoretically may be converted into a liver score.
  • The FibroScan produces an ultrasound image of the liver (from 20-80mm) along with a pressure reading (in kPa).
  • Transient elastography is much faster than a biopsy (usually lasts 2.5-5 minutes) and is completely painless.
  • Findings on transient elastography may show reasonable correlation with the severity of cirrhosis:[29][30]
Constrictive pericarditis
Budd-Chiari Syndrome
Splenic vein thrombosis Signs and symptoms of:
Portal vein thrombosis
Schistosomiasis
Sarcoidosis
Inferior vena cava obstruction
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia None
Idiopathic portal hypertension (hepatoportal sclerosis) None
Vitamin A intoxication, arsenic, and vinyl chloride toxicity None
  • History generally reveals exposure

Differentiating Cirrhosis from other causes of jaundice and abdominal pain

Cirrhosis must be differentiated from other diseases that cause jaundice, abdominal pain, weight loss, and fever such as Gallbladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, cholecystitis, choledochitis and liver fluke infections.


Abbreviations: RUQ= Right upper quadrant of the abdomen, LUQ= Left upper quadrant, LLQ= Left lower quadrant, RLQ= Right lower quadrant, LFT= Liver function test, SIRS= Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ERCP= Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, IV= Intravenous, N= Normal, AMA= Anti mitochondrial antibodies, LDH= Lactate dehydrogenase, GI= Gastrointestinal, CXR= Chest X ray, IgA= Immunoglobulin A, IgG= Immunoglobulin G, IgM= Immunoglobulin M, CT= Computed tomography, PMN= Polymorphonuclear cells, ESR= Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP= C-reactive protein, TS= Transferrin saturation, SF= Serum Ferritin, SMA= Superior mesenteric artery, SMV= Superior mesenteric vein, ECG= Electrocardiogram

Disease Clinical manifestations Diagnosis Comments
Symptoms Signs
Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging
Cholangiocarcinoma RUQ + + + + + Normal
  • Predisposes to pancreatic cancer
Hepatocellular carcinoma/Metastasis RUQ + + + + + + + + +
  • Normal
  • Hyperactive if obstruction present

Other symptoms:

Pancreatic carcinoma MidEpigastric + + + + + Normal

Skin manifestations may include:

Focal nodular hyperplasia Diffuse ± ± + + Normal
  • Open biopsy if diagnosis can not be established
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Gallbladder cancer Midepigastric + + + + Normal
Liver hemangioma Intermittent RUQ + + Normal
  • Abnormal LFTs
Liver abscess RUQ + + + + Normal
  • US
  • CT
Cirrhosis RUQ+Bloating + + + + Normal US
  • Stigmata of liver disease
  • Cruveilhier- Baumgarten murmur
Inflammatory lesions RUQ ± + + Normal US
  • Nodular,shrunken or coarse liver
  • Stigmata of liver disease

References

  1. Fargo MV, Grogan SP, Saguil A (2017). “Evaluation of Jaundice in Adults”. Am Fam Physician. 95 (3): 164–168. PMID 28145671.
  2. Leevy CB, Koneru B, Klein KM (1997). “Recurrent familial prolonged intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy associated with chronic liver disease”. Gastroenterology. 113 (3): 966–72. PMID 9287990.
  3. Hov JR, Boberg KM, Karlsen TH (2008). “Autoantibodies in primary sclerosing cholangitis”. World J. Gastroenterol. 14 (24): 3781–91. PMC 2721433. PMID 18609700.
  4. Bond LR, Hatty SR, Horn ME, Dick M, Meire HB, Bellingham AJ (1987). “Gall stones in sickle cell disease in the United Kingdom”. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 295 (6592): 234–6. PMC 1247079. PMID 3115390.
  5. Malakouti M, Kataria A, Ali SK, Schenker S (2017). “Elevated Liver Enzymes in Asymptomatic Patients – What Should I Do?”. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 5 (4): 394–403. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2017.00027. PMC 5719197. PMID 29226106.
  6. Udell JA, Wang CS, Tinmouth J, FitzGerald JM, Ayas NT, Simel DL, Schulzer M, Mak E, Yoshida EM (2012). “Does this patient with liver disease have cirrhosis?”. JAMA. 307 (8): 832–42. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.186. PMID 22357834.
  7. Becker CD, Scheidegger J, Marincek B (1986). “Hepatic vein occlusion: morphologic features on computed tomography and ultrasonography”. Gastrointest Radiol. 11 (4): 305–11. PMID 3533689.
  8. Di Lelio A, Cestari C, Lomazzi A, Beretta L (1989). “Cirrhosis: diagnosis with sonographic study of the liver surface”. Radiology. 172 (2): 389–92. doi:10.1148/radiology.172.2.2526349. PMID 2526349.
  9. Sanford NL, Walsh P, Matis C, Baddeley H, Powell LW (1985). “Is ultrasonography useful in the assessment of diffuse parenchymal liver disease?”. Gastroenterology. 89 (1): 186–91. PMID 3891495.
  10. Giorgio A, Amoroso P, Lettieri G, Fico P, de Stefano G, Finelli L, Scala V, Tarantino L, Pierri P, Pesce G (1986). “Cirrhosis: value of caudate to right lobe ratio in diagnosis with US”. Radiology. 161 (2): 443–5. doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3532188. PMID 3532188.
  11. Simonovský V (1999). “The diagnosis of cirrhosis by high resolution ultrasound of the liver surface”. Br J Radiol. 72 (853): 29–34. doi:10.1259/bjr.72.853.10341686. PMID 10341686.
  12. Trinchet JC, Chaffaut C, Bourcier V, Degos F, Henrion J, Fontaine H, Roulot D, Mallat A, Hillaire S, Cales P, Ollivier I, Vinel JP, Mathurin P, Bronowicki JP, Vilgrain V, N’Kontchou G, Beaugrand M, Chevret S (2011). “Ultrasonographic surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: a randomized trial comparing 3- and 6-month periodicities”. Hepatology. 54 (6): 1987–97. doi:10.1002/hep.24545. PMID 22144108.
  13. “EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma”. J. Hepatol. 56 (4): 908–43. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001. PMID 22424438.
  14. Procopet, Bogdan; Berzigotti, Annalisa (2017). “Diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension: imaging, non-invasive markers of fibrosis and liver biopsy”. Gastroenterology Report. 5 (2): 79–89. doi:10.1093/gastro/gox012. ISSN 2052-0034.
  15. Aagaard, J; Jensen, LI; Sorensen, TI; Christensen, U; Burcharth, F (1982). “Recanalized umbilical vein in portal hypertension”. American Journal of Roentgenology. 139 (6): 1107–1110. doi:10.2214/ajr.139.6.1107. ISSN 0361-803X.
  16. Cho, K C; Patel, Y D; Wachsberg, R H; Seeff, J (1995). “Varices in portal hypertension: evaluation with CT”. RadioGraphics. 15 (3): 609–622. doi:10.1148/radiographics.15.3.7624566. ISSN 0271-5333.
  17. Bandali, Murad Feroz; Mirakhur, Anirudh; Lee, Edward Wolfgang; Ferris, Mollie Clarke; Sadler, David James; Gray, Robin Ritchie; Wong, Jason Kam (2017). “Portal hypertension: Imaging of portosystemic collateral pathways and associated image-guided therapy”. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 23 (10): 1735. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1735. ISSN 1007-9327.
  18. Castera L, Pinzani M (2010). “Biopsy and non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis: does it take two to tango?”. Gut. 59 (7): 861–6. doi:10.1136/gut.2010.214650. PMID 20581229.
  19. Friedrich-Rust M, Nierhoff J, Lupsor M, Sporea I, Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Strobel D, Takahashi H, Yoneda M, Suda T, Zeuzem S, Herrmann E (2012). “Performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a pooled meta-analysis”. J. Viral Hepat. 19 (2): e212–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01537.x. PMID 22239521.
  20. Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Martens S, Sarrazin C, Bojunga J, Zeuzem S, Herrmann E (2008). “Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis”. Gastroenterology. 134 (4): 960–74. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.034. PMID 18395077.
  21. Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A, Christidis C, Mal F, Kazemi F, de Lédinghen V, Marcellin P, Dhumeaux D, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M (2005). “Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C”. Hepatology. 41 (1): 48–54. doi:10.1002/hep.20506. PMID 15690481.
  22. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, Christidis C, Ziol M, Poulet B, Kazemi F, Beaugrand M, Palau R (2003). “Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis”. Ultrasound Med Biol. 29 (12): 1705–13. PMID 14698338.
  23. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J, Calliada F, Cantisani V, Correas JM, D’Onofrio M, Drakonaki EE, Fink M, Friedrich-Rust M, Gilja OH, Havre RF, Jenssen C, Klauser AS, Ohlinger R, Saftoiu A, Schaefer F, Sporea I, Piscaglia F (2013). “EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology”. Ultraschall Med. 34 (2): 169–84. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1335205. PMID 23558397.
  24. “EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis”. J. Hepatol. 63 (1): 237–64. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006. PMID 25911335.
  25. Castera L, Bedossa P (2011). “How to assess liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: serum markers or transient elastography vs. liver biopsy?”. Liver Int. 31 Suppl 1: 13–7. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02380.x. PMID 21205132.
  26. Chou R, Wasson N (2013). “Blood tests to diagnose fibrosis or cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review”. Ann. Intern. Med. 158 (11): 807–20. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00005. PMID 23732714.
  27. Khallafi H, Qureshi K (2015). “Imaging Based Methods of Liver Fibrosis Assessment in Viral Hepatitis: A Practical Approach”. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2015: 809289. doi:10.1155/2015/809289. PMC 4686715. PMID 26779260.
  28. Singh S, Fujii LL, Murad MH, Wang Z, Asrani SK, Ehman RL, Kamath PS, Talwalkar JA (2013). “Liver stiffness is associated with risk of decompensation, liver cancer, and death in patients with chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11 (12): 1573–84.e1–2, quiz e88–9. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.034. PMC 3900882. PMID 23954643.
  29. Foucher J, Chanteloup E, Vergniol J; et al. (2006). “Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study”. Gut. 55 (3): 403–8. doi:10.1136/gut.2005.069153. PMID 16020491.
  30. Xie L, Chen X, Guo Q, Dong Y, Guang Y, Zhang X (2012). “Real-time elastography for diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B”. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine : Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 31 (7): 1053–60. PMID 22733854.

Template:WS Template:WH

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Sudarshana Datta, MD [3]

Overview

The most common cause of cirrhosis in the United States is chronic and heavy alcohol use, while the most common cause of cirrhosis worldwide and in Asian countries is the hepatitis virus. The gender that is most commonly affected by cirrhosis varies, depending upon the etiology. The incidence of cirrhosis increases with age; the median age of diagnosis of cirrhosis due to alcoholic liver disease is 52 years. The median age of diagnosis of cryptogenic/NAFLD/NASH cirrhosis is 60 years.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Prevalence

  • In 2015, the prevalence of cirrhosis was approximately 270 per 100,000 individuals in the United States.[1]
  • Currently, approximately seventy percent of cirrhotic individuals are unaware of having liver disease and go undiagnosed.
  • The prevalence of cirrhosis is higher in:
    • Non-Hispanic blacks
    • Individuals below the poverty line
    • Mexican Americans
    • Areas with high illiteracy rates
  • Chronic and heavy alcohol use is responsible for more than half of the cases of cirrhosis in the United States.[1]
  • The cost of cirrhosis in terms of human suffering, hospital costs, and lost productivity is high.
  • The rate of developing hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients is approximately 1%-4% per year.[2]

Alcoholic cirrhosis:

  • Alcoholic cirrhosis develops in 15% of individuals who drink heavily for more than a decade.
  • There is great variability in the amount of alcohol needed to cause cirrhosis (as little as 3-4 drinks a day in some men and 2-3 in some women).[3]

Chronic hepatitis B:

  • Chronic hepatitis B is the most common cause of cirrhosis worldwide, especially South-East Asia, but is less common in the United States.

Primary biliary cirrhosis:

  • In some areas of the US and UK, the prevalence is as high as 1 in 4000.

Non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): [4][5][6]

  • NAFLD has a 30 percent risk of fibrosis
  • NAFLD has a 2-15% rate of cirrhosis in less than 6 years

Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency:

  • Approximately 40 percent of adults with homozygosity of PIZZ have histologically significant liver injury and cirrhosis.[7]

Hepatopulmonary syndrome:

Portopulmonary hypertension:

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy:

  • The prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is 50% in cirrhotic patients.

Case-fatality rate/Mortality rate

  • The 10 year-mortality rate of cirrhosis is approximately 34- 66 percent, largely dependent on the cause of cirrhosis.

In 2001, cirrhosis was the tenth leading cause of death among men and the twelfth leading cause of death among women in the United States.[8]

  • In 2006, cirrhosis was the twelfth leading cause of all deaths in United States.[9]

Age

  • Cirrhosis is infrequently seen in young adults.
  • The incidence of cirrhosis increases with age; the median age at diagnosis of cirrhosis due to alcoholic liver disease is 52 years.[10]
  • The median age of diagnosis of cryptogenic/NAFLD/NASH cirrhosis is 60 years.
  • The median age of diagnosis of autoimmune cirrhosis is 43 years.

Race

Gender

  • The gender that is most commonly affected by cirrhosis varies, depending on the underlying etiology.

Primary biliary cirrhosis:

Chronic Hepatitis C:

  • The risk of cirrhosis after 20 years is estimated to be approximately 10%-15% for men and 1-5% for women.[2]

Non alcoholic fatty liver disease:

  • Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is more common among men than women in all age groups until age 60.
  • At 60 years of age, the prevalence of cirrhosis in males and females equalizes, due to absence of the protective nature of estrogen.[11]

Autoimmune hepatitis:

  • Autoimmune hepatitis usually occurs in women in seventy percent of cases between the ages of 15 and 40.

Alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency:

  • Male gender and obesity may be risk factors for progression to advanced liver disease in adulthood among patients with severe AAT deficiency.[12]

Developed Countries

  • Chronic and heavy alcohol use is responsible for more than half of the cases of cirrhosis in the United States.

Developing Countries

  • Chronic hepatitis B is the most common cause of cirrhosis worldwide, especially South-East Asia, but is less common in the United States.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Scaglione S, Kliethermes S, Cao G, Shoham D, Durazo R, Luke A, Volk ML (2015). “The Epidemiology of Cirrhosis in the United States: A Population-based Study”. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 49 (8): 690–6. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000208. PMID 25291348.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Yu ML, Chuang WL (2009). “Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Asia: when East meets West”. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 24 (3): 336–45. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05789.x. PMID 19335784.,
  3. Adams LA, Sanderson S, Lindor KD, et al. The histological course of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a longitudinal study of 103 patients with sequential liver biopsies. J Hepatol 2005;42(1):132–8.
  4. Harrison SA, Torgerson S, Hayashi PH. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease:a clinical histopathological study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98(9):2042–7.
  5. Ekstedt M, Franzén LE, Mathiesen UL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology 2006;44:865-73.
  6. Bals R (2010). “Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency”. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 24 (5): 629–33. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2010.08.006. PMID 20955965.
  7. Anderson RN, Smith BL. Deaths: leading causes for 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep2003;52:1-85. PMID 14626726.
  8. Heron MP, Hoyert DL, Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Kochanek KD, Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: Final data for 2006. National vital statistics reports; vol 57 no 14. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2009.
  9. 10.0 10.1 Sajja KC, Mohan DP, Rockey DC (2014). “Age and ethnicity in cirrhosis”. J. Investig. Med. 62 (7): 920–6. doi:10.1097/JIM.0000000000000106. PMC 4172494. PMID 25203153.
  10. Lobanova YS, Scherbakov AM, Shatskaya VA, Evteev VA, Krasil’nikov MA (2009). “NF- kappaB suppression provokes the sensitization of hormone-resistant breast cancer cells to estrogen apoptosis”. Mol Cell Biochem. 324.
  11. Bowlus CL, Willner I, Zern MA; et al. (2005). “Factors associated with advanced liver disease in adults with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency”. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 3 (4): 390–6. PMID 15822045.

Template:WS Template:WH

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Sudarshana Datta, MD [3]

Overview

Lifestyle and genetic risk factors play an important role in the development of cirrhosis in patients. Chronic alcohol use, chronic hepatitis B and C infection and genetic diseases such as cystic fibrosis are also significant risk factors for the development of cirrhosis.

Risk Factors

The risk factors of cirrhosis are as follows:

References

  1. Bellentani S, Saccoccio G, Costa G, Tiribelli C, Manenti F, Sodde M, Saveria Crocè L, Sasso F, Pozzato G, Cristianini G, Brandi G (1997). “Drinking habits as cofactors of risk for alcohol induced liver damage. The Dionysos Study Group”. Gut. 41 (6): 845–50. PMC 1891602. PMID 9462221.
  2. Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P (1997). “Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups”. Lancet. 349 (9055): 825–32. PMID 9121257.
  3. Bellentani S, Pozzato G, Saccoccio G, Crovatto M, Crocè LS, Mazzoran L, Masutti F, Cristianini G, Tiribelli C (1999). “Clinical course and risk factors of hepatitis C virus related liver disease in the general population: report from the Dionysos study”. Gut. 44 (6): 874–80. PMC 1727553. PMID 10323892.
  4. Clark JM (2006). “The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adults”. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 40 Suppl 1: S5–10. doi:10.1097/01.mcg.0000168638.84840.ff. PMID 16540768.
  5. Farrell GC, Larter CZ (2006). “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis”. Hepatology. 43 (2 Suppl 1): S99–S112. doi:10.1002/hep.20973. PMID 16447287.

Template:WH Template:WS

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sudarshana Datta, MD [2]

Overview

Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) must be done in every cirrhotic patient. It is performed at a frequency of 6-12 months. Screening endoscopy for detection of esophageal varices must be performed at regular intervals in all patients.

Screening

References

  1. “Cirrhosis: Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention – American Family Physician”.
  2. Trevisani F, Santi V, Gramenzi A, Di Nolfo MA, Del Poggio P, Benvegnù L, Rapaccini G, Farinati F, Zoli M, Borzio F, Giannini EG, Caturelli E, Bernardi M (2007). “Surveillance for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: is it effective in intermediate/advanced cirrhosis?”. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 102 (11): 2448–57, quiz 2458. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01395.x. PMID 17617210.
  3. Heidelbaugh JJ, Bruderly M (2006). “Cirrhosis and chronic liver failure: part I. Diagnosis and evaluation”. Am Fam Physician. 74 (5): 756–62. PMID 16970019.
  4. Qureshi W, Adler DG, Davila R, Egan J, Hirota W, Leighton J, Rajan E, Zuckerman MJ, Fanelli R, Wheeler-Harbaugh J, Baron TH, Faigel DO (2005). “ASGE Guideline: the role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage, updated July 2005”. Gastrointest. Endosc. 62 (5): 651–5. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2005.07.031. PMID 16246673.

Template:WS Template:WH

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sudarshana Datta, MD [2]

Overview

Cirrhosis is an irreversible process, the course of which is highly variable in patients. The natural history progresses in such a way that there is a lengthy stage of compensation, followed by the development of complications and sequelae as a result of the cirrhosis. The devastating complications include complete liver failure or the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Other complications include portal hypertension, ascites, jaundice, itching, esophageal varices, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and cardiomyopathy. Prognosis depends on the causes, existing complications and a variety of factors which make the prediction of life expectancy questionable. There are scores that classify disease severity and help to determine suitability for liver transplantation in patients.

Natural history

Decompensated cirrhosis

In patients with stable cirrhosis, decompensation may occur due to various causes:

Complications

Prognosis

Well-Compensated, no alcohol 35% mortality at 2 years
Onset of Ascites 50% mortality at 2 years
Variceal bleeding 65% mortality at 1 year (35% short-term mortality)

Poor prognostic factors

Scoring systems

Important scoring systems used are as follows:[27][28]

References

  1. Sajja KC, Mohan DP, Rockey DC (2014). “Age and ethnicity in cirrhosis”. J. Investig. Med. 62 (7): 920–6. doi:10.1097/JIM.0000000000000106. PMC 4172494. PMID 25203153.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Williams EJ, Iredale JP (1998). “Liver cirrhosis”. Postgrad Med J. 74 (870): 193–202. PMC 2360862. PMID 9683971.
  3. Schuppan D, Afdhal NH (2008). “Liver cirrhosis”. Lancet. 371 (9615): 838–51. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60383-9. PMC 2271178. PMID 18328931.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lindenmeyer CC, McCullough AJ (2018). “The Natural History of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease-An Evolving View”. Clin Liver Dis. 22 (1): 11–21. doi:10.1016/j.cld.2017.08.003. PMID 29128051.
  5. Bloom S, Kemp W, Lubel J (2015). “Portal hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management”. Intern Med J. 45 (1): 16–26. doi:10.1111/imj.12590. PMID 25230084.
  6. Arroyo V, Ginès P, Gerbes AL, Dudley FJ, Gentilini P, Laffi G, Reynolds TB, Ring-Larsen H, Schölmerich J (1996). “Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. International Ascites Club”. Hepatology. 23 (1): 164–76. doi:10.1002/hep.510230122. PMID 8550036.
  7. Wilkinson SP, Moore KP, Arroyo V (1991). “Pathogenesis of ascites and hepatorenal syndrome”. Gut. Suppl: S12–7. PMC 1405222. PMID 1833293.
  8. Epstein M (1992). “The hepatorenal syndrome–newer perspectives”. N. Engl. J. Med. 327 (25): 1810–1. doi:10.1056/NEJM199212173272509. PMID 1435935.
  9. Ginès P, Guevara M, Arroyo V, Rodés J (2003). “Hepatorenal syndrome”. Lancet. 362 (9398): 1819–27. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14903-3. PMID 14654322.
  10. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J (2003). “Hepatocellular carcinoma”. Lancet. 362 (9399): 1907–17. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14964-1. PMID 14667750.
  11. García-Criado A, Castellón D (2017). “Presentation of the series “Cirrhosis of the liver and its complications“. Radiologia. doi:10.1016/j.rx.2017.10.003. PMID 29169606.
  12. “Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis – Garcia-Tsao – 2007 – Hepatology – Wiley Online Library”.
  13. Wanless IR, Wong F, Blendis LM, Greig P, Heathcote EJ, Levy G (1995). “Hepatic and portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: possible role in development of parenchymal extinction and portal hypertension”. Hepatology. 21 (5): 1238–47. PMID 7737629.
  14. Butterworth RF (2000). “Complications of cirrhosis III. Hepatic encephalopathy”. J. Hepatol. 32 (1 Suppl): 171–80. PMID 10728803.
  15. Riordan SM, Williams R (2006). “The intestinal flora and bacterial infection in cirrhosis”. J. Hepatol. 45 (5): 744–57. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2006.08.001. PMID 16979776.
  16. Papatheodoridis GV, Patch D, Webster GJ, Brooker J, Barnes E, Burroughs AK (1999). “Infection and hemostasis in decompensated cirrhosis: a prospective study using thrombelastography”. Hepatology. 29 (4): 1085–90. doi:10.1002/hep.510290437. PMID 10094951.
  17. Fede G, D’Amico G, Arvaniti V, Tsochatzis E, Germani G, Georgiadis D, Morabito A, Burroughs AK (2012). “Renal failure and cirrhosis: a systematic review of mortality and prognosis”. J. Hepatol. 56 (4): 810–8. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.10.016. PMID 22173162.
  18. Arguedas MR, Abrams GA, Krowka MJ, Fallon MB (2003). “Prospective evaluation of outcomes and predictors of mortality in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome undergoing liver transplantation”. Hepatology. 37 (1): 192–7. doi:10.1053/jhep.2003.50023. PMID 12500204.
  19. Fallon MB (2005). “Mechanisms of pulmonary vascular complications of liver disease: hepatopulmonary syndrome”. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 39 (4 Suppl 2): S138–42. PMID 15758649.
  20. Naeije R (2003). “Hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension”. Swiss Med Wkly. 133 (11–12): 163–9. PMID 12715285.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Rodriguez-Roisin R, Krowka MJ, Herve P, Fallon MB; ERS Task Force Pulmonary-Hepatic Vascular Disorders (PHD) Scientific Committee. Pulmonary-Hepatic vascular Disorders (PHD). Eur Respir J 2004;24:861-80. PMID 15516683.
  22. Blendis L, Wong F (2003). “Portopulmonary hypertension: an increasingly important complication of cirrhosis”. Gastroenterology. 125 (2): 622–4. PMID 12891571.
  23. Gaskari SA, Honar H, Lee SS (2006). “Therapy insight: Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy”. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 3 (6): 329–37. doi:10.1038/ncpgasthep0498. PMID 16741552.
  24. Chu CM, Chang KY, Liaw YF (1995). “Prevalence and prognostic significance of bacterascites in cirrhosis with ascites”. Dig. Dis. Sci. 40 (3): 561–5. PMID 7895544.
  25. D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L (2006). “Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies”. J. Hepatol. 44 (1): 217–31. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013. PMID 16298014.
  26. Sorensen HT, Thulstrup AM, Mellemkjar L, Jepsen P, Christensen E, Olsen JH, Vilstrup H. Long-term survival and cause-specific mortality in patients with cirrhosis of the liver: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. J Clin Epidemiol2003;56:88-93. PMID 12589875.
  27. Infante-Rivard C, Esnaola S, Villeneuve JP (1987). “Clinical and statistical validity of conventional prognostic factors in predicting short-term survival among cirrhotics”. Hepatology. 7 (4): 660–4. PMID 3610046.
  28. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau TM, Kosberg CL, D’Amico G, Dickson ER, Kim WR (2001). “A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease”. Hepatology. 33 (2): 464–70. doi:10.1053/jhep.2001.22172. PMID 11172350.
  29. Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, Harper A, Kim R, Kamath P, Kremers W, Lake J, Howard T, Merion RM, Wolfe RA, Krom R (2003). “Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers”. Gastroenterology. 124 (1): 91–6. doi:10.1053/gast.2003.50016. PMID 12512033.
  30. Wiesner RH (2005). “Evidence-based evolution of the MELD/PELD liver allocation policy”. Liver Transpl. 11 (3): 261–3. doi:10.1002/lt.20362. PMID 15719393.
  31. Huo TI, Wu JC, Lin HC, Lee FY, Hou MC, Lee PC, Chang FY, Lee SD (2005). “Evaluation of the increase in model for end-stage liver disease (DeltaMELD) score over time as a prognostic predictor in patients with advanced cirrhosis: risk factor analysis and comparison with initial MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score”. J. Hepatol. 42 (6): 826–32. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2005.01.019. PMID 15885353.
  32. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the esophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973;60:646-9. PMID 4541913.

Template:WH Template:WS

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies | Clinical prediction rules

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Template:Gastroenterology

zh-min-nan:Koaⁿ-ngē-hoà da:Skrumplever de:Leberzirrhose eu:Zirrosi hr:Ciroza jetre is:Skorpulifur it:Cirrosi epatica he:שחמת הכבד la:Cirrosis iecuris ln:Bokɔnɔ bwa libale mk:Цироза nl:Levercirrose no:Skrumplever sq:Cirroza sl:Ciroza jeter fi:Kirroosi sv:Skrumplever


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH