Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis

For patient information, click here
To go back to the Amyloidosis landing page, click here.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]

Synonyms and keywords:

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]

Overview

In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis. There is no significant data regarding the historical perspective of amyloidosis throughout the 18th century. Rudolph Virchow and Weber are the prominent figures with substantial work on amyloidosis during the 19th century. In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis. There is no established system for the classification of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein that deposits in the different tissues and causes organ dysfunction and a wide variety of clinical syndromes. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a type of systemic amyloidosis as transthyretin (TTR) deposits can be found throughout the body. TTR results in pathologies due to misfolding, breaking apart, and deposition of the amyloid fibrils in healthy tissue. The condition mainly affects the heart. However, other organ systems, such as the nervous and musculoskeletal systems, can also be involved. There are no genes implicated in the causality of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Aging is very strongly associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is caused by the folding and/breaking apart of a normal occurring protein, transthyretin (TTR). Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be differentiated from other conditions that present with heart failure, polyneuropathy, and organomegaly. The incidence of amyloidosis is approximately 1.2 per 100,000 individuals per year worldwide. The actual incidence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis in particular is unknown. The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries. Patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis are almost always elderly (65 years of age or older). There is no racial predilection to wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Men are traditionally more commonly affected by wild-type (senile) amyloidosis than women. Aging has been implicated to be a risk factor for the development of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis, as the name suggests, is a disease of the elderly. The clinical picture of the disease corresponds to the type of organ or organ system involved. It most commonly affects the heart and hence, clinical features pertaining to cardiac pathologies, dominate the clinical course of the disease. If left untreated, wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can lead to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and eventually death. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is most commonly complicated by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The median duration of survival after diagnosis is 75 months. The diagnostic study of choice in amyloidosis is tissue biopsy of the affected organ. Congo Red staining will show apple green birefringence of the tissue sample under polarized light, and subtyping of light chains (for light chain amyloidosis) can be done via mass spectrometry. Bone marrow biopsy and organ-specific laboratory measurements are also important ancillary tests. The clinical features of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis depend on the type of organ or organ system involved. Cardiac and peripheral nerves involvement can result in clinically evident pathology. The most commonly involved organ is the heart and majority of the patients present with signs and symptoms of heart failure. Less common symptoms correspond to the involvement of organs or organ systems other than the heart. Physical examination of patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be significant for the condition in question and can also translate the variety of pathologies as a part of aging and age-related comorbidities. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a diagnosis of exclusion. Laboratory tests are conducted to evaluate for the presence or absence AL amyloid protein deposition. The absence of AL amyloid provides a strong clue towards the provisional diagnosis of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Cardiac biomarkers are the most important predictors of outcome in amyloidosis. EKG findings encountered during the evaluation of a patient with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis include pseudoinfarct pattern, poor R wave progression, atrial fibrillation, first degree AV block, and nonspecific ST-T wave abnormalities. Voltage-to-mass ratio, calculated by the sum of S wave in lead V1 plus R wave in lead V5 or V6 (SV1 + RV5 or V6) divided by the echocardiographic muscle cross-sectional area, has been implicated to have high sensitivity and specificity for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. There are no x-ray findings associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. The most commonly encountered pathology on 2D echocardiography is increased left ventricular thickness (secondary to amyloid fibrils deposition in the extracellular matrix). Advanced echocardiographic techniques (strain and strain rate imaging) can differentiate cardiomyopathy secondary to amyloidosis from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy. In regards to the evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis, EFSR has approximately 90% and 92% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. There are no CT scan findings associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. T1 sequence of CMR with the use of gadolinium can differentiate extracellular tissue thickening due to myocardial hypertrophy vs. extracellular deposition. Using pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV) can be calculated, which is a direct measurement of the cardiac interstitium. ECV expansion is a quantitative marker of the amyloid burden and can detect amyloid fibrils infiltration earlier than conventional testing. One of the benefits of T1 mapping is the fact that it does not require contrast, which is favorable in the setting of kidney disease. Bone-avid tracers, such as 99mTc-DPD (technetium-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicar-boxylic acid), 99mTc-PYP (technetium-pyrophosphate), and 99mTc-HMDP [technetium-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (Tc-HMDP)] have been implicated to have high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis and differentiating it from other cardiomyopathies with HFpEF. Combination of grade 2 or 3 cardiac uptake on a bone-avid tracer scan in the setting of absent monoclonal protein by serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), urine IFE, and serum free light chain assay is diagnostic of wild-type (senile) cardiac amyloidosis. Other diagnostic studies that help in diagnosing wild-type (senile) amyloidosis include histopathological analysis and genetic testing. There is no treatment for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis; the mainstay of therapy is supportive treatment aimed at symptoms of the disease. Supportive treatment is with diuretics, antiarrhythmics or pacemaker implantation, anticoagulation where supraventricular arrhythmias are present, and an avoidance of digoxin and calcium channel blockers. Antihypertensives are usually poorly tolerated as these patients can be profoundly hypotensive. Pharmacologic therapies aimed at stabilizing the transthyretin molecule and thus preventing amyloid formation are being actively investigated. Surgery is not the mainstay of therapy for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) implantation can be considered but a review of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) database is necessary to better evaluate the outcomes of LVAD implantation in these patients. Despite the the deteriorating cardiac function of such patients, they are rarely considered for heart transplantation due to their advanced disease presentation, age, and associated comorbidities. There are no established measures for the primary prevention of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Historical Perspective

In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis. There is no significant data regarding the historical perspective of amyloidosis throughout the 18th century. Rudolph Virchow and Weber are the prominent figures with substantial work on amyloidosis during the 19th century. In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis.

Classification

There is no established system for the classification of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Pathophysiology

Amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein that deposits in the different tissues and causes organ dysfunction and a wide variety of clinical syndromes. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a type of systemic amyloidosis as transthyretin (TTR) deposits can be found throughout the body. TTR results in pathologies due to misfolding, breaking apart, and deposition of the amyloid fibrils in healthy tissue. The condition mainly affects the heart. However, other organ systems, such as the nervous and musculoskeletal systems, can also be involved. There are no genes implicated in the causality of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Aging is very strongly associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Causes

Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is caused by the folding and/breaking apart of a normal occurring protein, transthyretin (TTR).

Differentiating Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis from Other Diseases

Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be differentiated from other conditions that present with heart failure, polyneuropathy, and organomegaly.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence of amyloidosis is approximately 1.2 per 100,000 individuals per year worldwide. The actual incidence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis in particular is unknown. The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries. Patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis are almost always elderly (65 years of age or older). There is no racial predilection to wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Men are traditionally more commonly affected by wild-type (senile) amyloidosis than women.

Risk Factors

Aging has been implicated to be a risk factor for the development of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis, as the name suggests, is a disease of the elderly. The clinical picture of the disease corresponds to the type of organ or organ system involved. It most commonly affects the heart and hence, clinical features pertaining to cardiac pathologies, dominate the clinical course of the disease. If left untreated, wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can lead to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and eventually death. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is most commonly complicated by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The median duration of survival after diagnosis is 75 months.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

The diagnostic study of choice in amyloidosis is tissue biopsy of the affected organ. Congo Red staining will show apple green birefringence of the tissue sample under polarized light, and subtyping of light chains (for light chain amyloidosis) can be done via mass spectrometry. Bone marrow biopsy and organ-specific laboratory measurements are also important ancillary tests.

History and Symptoms

The clinical features of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis depend on the type of organ or organ system involved. Cardiac and peripheral nerves involvement can result in clinically evident pathology. The most commonly involved organ is the heart and majority of the patients present with signs and symptoms of heart failure. Less common symptoms correspond to the involvement of organs or organ systems other than the heart.

Physical Examination

Physical examination of patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be significant for the condition in question and can also translate the variety of pathologies as a part of aging and age-related comorbidities.

Laboratory Findings

Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a diagnosis of exclusion. Laboratory tests are conducted to evaluate for the presence or absence AL amyloid protein deposition. The absence of AL amyloid provides a strong clue towards the provisional diagnosis of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Cardiac biomarkers are the most important predictors of outcome in amyloidosis.

Electrocardiogram

EKG findings encountered during the evaluation of a patient with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis include pseudoinfarct pattern, poor R wave progression, atrial fibrillation, first degree AV block, and nonspecific ST-T wave abnormalities. Voltage-to-mass ratio, calculated by the sum of S wave in lead V1 plus R wave in lead V5 or V6 (SV1 + RV5 or V6) divided by the echocardiographic muscle cross-sectional area, has been implicated to have high sensitivity and specificity for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

X-ray

There are no x-ray findings associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

The most commonly encountered pathology on 2D echocardiography is increased left ventricular thickness (secondary to amyloid fibrils deposition in the extracellular matrix). Advanced echocardiographic techniques (strain and strain rate imaging) can differentiate cardiomyopathy secondary to amyloidosis from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy. In regards to the evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis, EFSR has approximately 90% and 92% sensitivity and specificity, respectively.

CT scan

There are no CT scan findings associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

MRI

T1 sequence of CMR with the use of gadolinium can differentiate extracellular tissue thickening due to myocardial hypertrophy vs. extracellular deposition. Using pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV) can be calculated, which is a direct measurement of the cardiac interstitium. ECV expansion is a quantitative marker of the amyloid burden and can detect amyloid fibrils infiltration earlier than conventional testing. One of the benefits of T1 mapping is the fact that it does not require contrast, which is favorable in the setting of kidney disease.

Other Imaging Findings

Bone-avid tracers, such as 99mTc-DPD (technetium-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicar-boxylic acid), 99mTc-PYP (technetium-pyrophosphate), and 99mTc-HMDP [technetium-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (Tc-HMDP)] have been implicated to have high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis and differentiating it from other cardiomyopathies with HFpEF. Combination of grade 2 or 3 cardiac uptake on a bone-avid tracer scan in the setting of absent monoclonal protein by serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), urine IFE, and serum free light chain assay is diagnostic of wild-type (senile) cardiac amyloidosis.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic studies that help in diagnosing wild-type (senile) amyloidosis include histopathological analysis and genetic testing.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

There is no treatment for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis; the mainstay of therapy is supportive treatment aimed at symptoms of the disease. Supportive treatment is with diuretics, antiarrhythmics or pacemaker implantation, anticoagulation where supraventricular arrhythmias are present, and an avoidance of digoxin and calcium channel blockers. Antihypertensives are usually poorly tolerated as these patients can be profoundly hypotensive. Pharmacologic therapies aimed at stabilizing the transthyretin molecule and thus preventing amyloid formation are being actively investigated.

Surgery

Surgery is not the mainstay of therapy for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) implantation can be considered but a review of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) database is necessary to better evaluate the outcomes of LVAD implantation in these patients. Despite the the deteriorating cardiac function of such patients, they are rarely considered for heart transplantation due to their advanced disease presentation, age, and associated comorbidities.

Primary Prevention

There are no established measures for the primary prevention of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shaghayegh Habibi, M.D.[2]

Overview

In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis. There is no significant data regarding the historical perspective of amyloidosis throughout the 18th century. Rudolph Virchow and Weber are the prominent figures with substantial work on amyloidosis during the 19th century. In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis.

Historical Perspective

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Kyle RA (June 2011). “Amyloidosis: a brief history”. Amyloid. 18 Suppl 1: 6–7. doi:10.3109/13506129.2011.574354001. PMID 21838413.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Sipe JD, Cohen AS (June 2000). “Review: history of the amyloid fibril”. J. Struct. Biol. 130 (2–3): 88–98. doi:10.1006/jsbi.2000.4221. PMID 10940217.
  3. Khan MF, Falk RH (November 2001). “Amyloidosis”. Postgrad Med J. 77 (913): 686–93. PMC 1742163. PMID 11677276.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

There is no established system for the classification of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Classification

There is no established system for the classification of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

References

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]

Overview

Amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein that deposits in the different tissues and causes organ dysfunction and a wide variety of clinical syndromes. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a type of systemic amyloidosis as transthyretin (TTR) deposits can be found throughout the body. TTR results in pathologies due to misfolding, breaking apart, and deposition of the amyloid fibrils in healthy tissue. The condition mainly affects the heart. However, other organ systems, such as the nervous and musculoskeletal systems, can also be involved. There are no genes implicated in the causality of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Aging is very strongly associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Pathophysiology

Systemic Amyloidosis

Pathogenesis

Genetics

  • There are no genes implicated in the causality of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Associated Conditions

  • Aging is very strongly associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

Gross Pathology

Cardiac amyloid deposits are most commonly seen in the myocardium, but can also be seen in the atria, pericardium, endocardium and microvasculature.

  • On gross examination, the myocardium is thicker, firm and rubbery in consistency. More than half of myocardium involvement is common in the AL type of cardiac amyloidosis.
  • The size of the ventricular cavity remains unchanged, however filling of the ventricles is restricted (causing restrictive cardiomyopathy) because of stiffening of the ventricular wall as a result of deposition of amyloid material.
  • Pericardial effusion and valvular dysfunction is common from pericardial and endocardial involvement. Intracardiac thrombus formation is frequently seen and may result in fatal thromboembolism.[6][7][8]

Images

Images shown below are courtesy of Professor Peter Anderson and published with permission. © PEIR, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Pathology

Amyloidosis Lesion In Left Atrium: Gross natural color view of a diagnostic lesion
Amyloidosis Lesion In Left Atrium: Gross natural color close-up
Amyloidosis, left atrium, endocardial nodules
Amyloidosis, left atrium, endocardial nodules
Amyloidosis and left ventricular hypertrophy


Microscopic Pathology

  • Under light microscope, extracellular deposits of hyaline like amyloid material are evident. Resultant myocardial fibrosis restricts the movement of the ventricle, compromising complete filling of the ventricle during diastole.
  • Amyloid deposits are also seen in the vasculature, particularly the microvasculature thereby sparing the large epicardial vessels. This leads to myocardial ischemia and tissue infarction.
Heart: Perivascular amyloid, amyloidosis, congo red showing birefringence
Heart: Perivascular amyloid, amyloidosis (Hematoxylin and eosin staining)
Heart: Amyloidosis, aldehyde fuchsin stain


References

  1. Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN (June 2016). “Systemic amyloidosis”. Lancet. 387 (10038): 2641–2654. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01274-X. PMID 26719234.
  2. Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN (June 2016). “Systemic amyloidosis”. Lancet. 387 (10038): 2641–2654. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01274-X. PMID 26719234.
  3. Baker KR, Rice L (2012). “The amyloidoses: clinical features, diagnosis and treatment”. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 8 (3): 3–7. PMC 3487569. PMID 23227278.
  4. Pepys MB (2006). “Amyloidosis”. Annu. Rev. Med. 57: 223–41. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131243. PMID 16409147.
  5. Ilia G. Halatchev, Jingsheng Zheng & Jiafu Ou (2018). “Wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTRwt-CA), previously known as senile cardiac amyloidosis: clinical presentation, diagnosis, management and emerging therapies”. Journal of thoracic disease. 10 (3): 2034–2045. doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.03.134. PMID 29707360. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  6. Nakagawa M, Tojo K, Sekijima Y, Yamazaki KH, Ikeda S (2012). “Arterial thromboembolism in senile systemic amyloidosis: report of two cases”. Amyloid : the International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Investigation : the Official Journal of the International Society of Amyloidosis. 19 (2): 118–21. doi:10.3109/13506129.2012.685131. PMID 22583098. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  7. Van de Veire NR, Dierick J, De Sutter J (2012). “Intracardiac emboli as first presentation of cardiac AL amyloidosis”. European Heart Journal. 33 (7): 818. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr330. PMC 3345559. PMID 21893485. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  8. Feng D, Edwards WD, Oh JK; et al. (2007). “Intracardiac thrombosis and embolism in patients with cardiac amyloidosis”. Circulation. 116 (21): 2420–6. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.697763. PMID 17984380. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is caused by the folding and/breaking apart of a normal occurring protein, transthyretin (TTR).

Causes

  • Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is caused by the folding and/breaking apart of a normal occurring protein, transthyretin (TTR).[1]

References

  1. Ilia G. Halatchev, Jingsheng Zheng & Jiafu Ou (2018). “Wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTRwt-CA), previously known as senile cardiac amyloidosis: clinical presentation, diagnosis, management and emerging therapies”. Journal of thoracic disease. 10 (3): 2034–2045. doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.03.134. PMID 29707360. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Differentiating Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [3]

Overview

Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be differentiated from other conditions that present with heart failure, polyneuropathy, and organomegaly.

Differentiating Wild-type (Senile) Amyloidosis from other Diseases

Differentials Based on Cardiac Involvement (Heart Failure)

Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis should be differentiated from other causes of heart failure:

Differential Diagnosis History and Symptoms Physical Examination Laboratory Findings Imaging Findings
Cardiac amyloidosis
  • Elevated jugular pressure

Periorbital purpura: Often occurs with sneezing, coughing or with minor trauma. Indicates capillary involvement of AL type amyloidosis.

  • Macroglossia
  • Abnormal phonation
  • Hepatomegaly
  • Ascites may be present in the setting of heart failure
  • Valvular involvement murmurs of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (systolic).


  • Normocytic mormochromic anemia
  • Serum free-light-chain assay positive
  • Increased BNP, ANP and β2 microglobulin
  • Voltage-to-mass ratio is more sensitive than EKG, 2D Echo and nuclear scanning alone
Cardiac sarcoidosis
  • Asymptomatic conduction abnormalities
  • Chest pain
  • Congestive heart failure symptoms:
    • Fatigue
    • Syncope
    • Dyspnea
    • Chest pain.
    • Irregular heartbeats
    • Palpitations
    • edema
  • Ventricular tachyarrhythmia
  • Heart block
  • Valvular regurgitation
  • Pericardial effusion
  • Constrictive pericarditis or temponade
  • Serum markers that have been reported as markers of sarcoidosis in general are:
    • Serum amyloid A (SAA)
    • Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R)
    • Lysozyme
    • Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)
    • Gycoprotein KL-6
    • Hypercalcemia
    • Hypercalciuria
    • (noncaseating granulomas secrete 1,25 vitamin D)
  • Radionuclide examinations
    • Thallium‐201 scintigraphy
    • Gallium‐67 scintigraphy
    • Positron emission tomography
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Samples of myocardium with sarcoidosis shows the following:
  • Non‐caseating, multinucleated giant cell granuloma in the subendocardium
  • Trichrome stain can show a dense band of collagen fibers, encasing aggregate of granulomas and inflammatory cells
ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • Chest pain with possible radiation to left arm and lower jaw
  • Squeezing, crushing chest pain
  • Sweating
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Anxious patient in pain with diaphoresis
  • Signs of heart failure may be present
  • Arrhythmia
  • ST elevation, new left bundle branch block, and Q wave on EKG
  • Elevated cardiac biomarkers
  • Either complete or subtotal occlusion of an epicardial coronary artery on coronary angiography
  • Confluent hyperenhancement extending from the endocardium
Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • Crushing, left-sided substernal chest pain or pressure that radiates to the neck or left arm
  • Same as ST-elevation MI
  • ST-segment depression or T-wave inversion on EKG
  • Elevated cardiac biomarkers
Pericarditis
  • Chest pain relieved by sitting up and leaning forward and worsened by lying down
  • Fever, anxiety, difficulty breathing
  • Pericardial friction rub
  • Signs of cardiac tamponade may be present
  • PR segment depression and electrical alternans on EKG
  • A flask-shaped, enlarged cardiac silhouette on CXR
  • Pericardial thickness of more than 4 mm on MRI
  • Pericardial effusion and cardiac chamber indentation or collapse on echo when cardiac tamponade is present
Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy
  • History of alcohol abuse
  • Fatigue, weakness, anorexia, palpitations, and shortness of breath on activity
  • Leg swelling and pedal edema
  • Signs of heart failure such as presence of S3 and S4 heart sounds, pedal edema, and jugular venous distension
  • Signs of alcoholic liver disease may be present
  • Elevated MCV and MCHC on CBC
  • Elevated LDH, AST, ALT, creatine kinase, gammaglutamyl transpeptidase, malic dehydrogenase, and alpha-hydroxybutyric dehydrogenase
  • Q waves and non specific ST and T wave changes on EKG
  • Cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion, and pleural effusions on CXR
  • Left ventricular dilatation on echo


Differentials Based on Presentation As a Multi-Organ System Dysfunction Disorder


Organ System Involvement Differential Diagnosis Causes Clinical Features Laboratory Findings Gold Standard Test Therapy
Polyneuropathy
POEMS syndrome (Demyelinating)
Metabolic Syndrome (Axonal pathology)
Vitamin Deficiencies (Axonal Pathology)
      Guillain-Barre Syndrome (Demyelinating)
      • Delayed F waves
      • Clinical diagnostic criteria (progressive weakness of more than two limbs, areflexia, and progression for no more than four weeks)
      Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) (Mixed axonal and demyelinatiing)
        • EFNS/PNS criteria
        • Koski criteria
        Multifocal Motor Neuropathy
        • Progressive, asymmetric, distal and upper limb predominant weakness
        • No significant sensory abnormalities
        • Areflexia
        • Clinical criteria (EFNS/PNS):
          • Slowly progressive or step-wise progressive, focal, asymmetric limb weakness; i.e., motor involvement in the motor nerve distribution of at least two nerves for > 1 month.
          • No objective sensory abnormalities except for minor vibration sense abnormalities in the lower limbs
          Organ System Involvement Differential Diagnosis Causes Features Laboratory Findings Gold Standard Test Therapy
          Organomegaly (Hepatosplenomegaly and Lymphadenopathy) Malaria
          Kala-azar
            Infective Hepatitis
            Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML)
            Lymphoma
            Primary (AL) Amyloidosis
            • Typical green birefringence under polarized light after Congo red staining (appears in red under normal light)
            • Congo red staining
            • Melphalan-prednisone/dexamethasone
            • Dexamethasone plus Cyclophosphamide-thalidomide
            • Stem cell transplantation
            Gaucher’s Disease
            Organ System Involvement Differential Diagnosis Causes Features Laboratory Findings Gold Standard Test Therapy
            Cardiac Failure Cardiac amyloidosis (AL and ATTRwt)
            • Monoclonal plasma cell proliferation
            • Extracellular amyloid fibril deposition
              • Fatigue
              • Dyspnea
              • Dizziness
              • Orthopnea
              • Peripheral edema
              • Weight loss due to cardiac cachexia
              • Ascites
              • Syncope on exertion
              • Transthyretin (ATTRwt) associated more common in African-Americans during sixth to seventh decade of life
                • Normocytic mormochromic anemia
                • Serum free-light-chain assay positive
                • Increased BNP, ANP and β2 microglobulin
                • Voltage-to-mass ratio is more sensitive than EKG, 2D Echo and nuclear scanning alone
                  • Biopsy:
                  • Diffuse deposition of amorphous hyaline material (nodular pattern – 8 to15 nm in diameter), in mesangium (weakly staining with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)


                    • Supportive care
                    • Tafamidis
                    • Melphalan-prednisone/dexamethasone
                    • Dexamethasone plus Cyclophosphamide-thalidomide
                    Cardiac sarcoidosis
                    • The causes are not fully known.
                    • Over-reaction of the immune system after exposure to an infectious agent (bacteria or viruses), chemical, or allergen.
                    • Excessive inflammation and the clustering of white blood cells.
                      • Asymptomatic conduction abnormalities
                      • Chest pain
                      • Congestive heart failure symptoms:
                        • Fatigue
                        • Syncope
                        • Dyspnea
                        • Chest pain.
                        • Irregular heartbeats
                        • Palpitations
                        • edema

                      Serum markers that have been reported as markers of sarcoidosis in general are:

                      • Serum amyloid A (SAA)
                      • Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R)
                      • Lysozyme
                      • Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)
                      • Gycoprotein KL-6
                      • Hypercalcemia
                      • Hypercalciuria
                      • (noncaseating granulomas secrete 1,25 vitamin D)
                      • Biopsy: samples of myocardium with sarcoidosis shows the following:
                      • Non‐caseating, multinucleated giant cell granuloma in the subendocardium
                      • Trichrome stain can show a dense band of collagen fibers, encasing aggregate of granulomas and inflammatory cells
                      • Corticosteroid treatment
                      • Antiarrhythmic treatment
                      • Pacemakers and defibrillators
                      • Cardiac transplantation
                      Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy


                      • Echocardiography:
                        • Left ventricular asymmetric hypertrophy
                        • Parasternal long axis shows relationship of the septal hypertrophy and the outflow tract
                        • Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction
                        • SAM (systolic anterior motion) of the mitral leaflet
                        • Mid-systolic closure of the aortic valve
                        • Late peaking, high velocity flow in the outflow tract
                        • Variability of obstruction with maneuvers (exercise, amyl nitrate inhalation, and post-PVC beats)
                      Alcoholic cardiomyopathy
                      • Alcohol consumption


                            ST-elevation myocardial infarction
                              Pericarditis



                                References

                                Epidemiology and Demographics

                                Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]

                                Overview

                                The incidence of amyloidosis is approximately 1.2 per 100,000 individuals per year worldwide. The actual incidence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis in particular is unknown. The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries. Patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis are almost always elderly (65 years of age or older). There is no racial predilection to wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Men are traditionally more commonly affected by wild-type (senile) amyloidosis than women.

                                Epidemiology and Demographics

                                Incidence

                                • The incidence of amyloidosis is approximately 1.2 per 100,000 individuals per year worldwide.[1]
                                • The actual incidence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis in particular is unknown.

                                Prevalence

                                • The prevalence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis has not been determined.
                                • It is estimated that approximately 25% of the people beyond the age of 80 have cardiac TTR deposition.[2]

                                Mortality rate

                                • The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries.[3]

                                Age

                                • Patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis are almost always elderly (65 years of age or older).

                                Race

                                • There is no racial predilection to wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

                                Gender

                                • Men are traditionally more commonly affected by wild-type (senile) amyloidosis than women.[4]

                                References

                                1. Khan MF, Falk RH (November 2001). “Amyloidosis”. Postgrad Med J. 77 (913): 686–93. PMC 1742163. PMID 11677276.
                                2. G. G. 3rd Cornwell, W. L. Murdoch, R. A. Kyle, P. Westermark & P. Pitkanen (1983). “Frequency and distribution of senile cardiovascular amyloid. A clinicopathologic correlation”. The American journal of medicine. 75 (4): 618–623. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(83)90443-6. PMID 6624768. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
                                3. Pepys MB (2006). “Amyloidosis”. Annu. Rev. Med. 57: 223–41. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131243. PMID 16409147.
                                4. Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
                                Risk Factors

                                Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]

                                Overview

                                Aging has been implicated to be a risk factor for the development of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

                                Risk Factors

                                Aging has been implicated to be a risk factor for the development of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

                                References

                                Screening

                                Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]

                                Overview

                                There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

                                Screening

                                There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.

                                References

                                Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

                                Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]

                                Overview

                                Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis, as the name suggests, is a disease of the elderly. The clinical picture of the disease corresponds to the type of organ or organ system involved. It most commonly affects the heart and hence, clinical features pertaining to cardiac pathologies, dominate the clinical course of the disease. If left untreated, wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can lead to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and eventually death. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is most commonly complicated by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The median duration of survival after diagnosis is 75 months.

                                Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

                                Natural History

                                Complications

                                Prognosis

                                References

                                1. Baker KR, Rice L (2012). “The amyloidoses: clinical features, diagnosis and treatment”. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 8 (3): 3–7. PMC 3487569. PMID 23227278.
                                2. Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
                                3. 3.0 3.1 Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
                                4. Claudio Rapezzi, Giampaolo Merlini, Candida C. Quarta, Letizia Riva, Simone Longhi, Ornella Leone, Fabrizio Salvi, Paolo Ciliberti, Francesca Pastorelli, Elena Biagini, Fabio Coccolo, Robin M. T. Cooke, Letizia Bacchi-Reggiani, Diego Sangiorgi, Alessandra Ferlini, Michele Cavo, Elena Zamagni, Maria Luisa Fonte, Giovanni Palladini, Francesco Salinaro, Francesco Musca, Laura Obici, Angelo Branzi & Stefano Perlini (2009). “Systemic cardiac amyloidoses: disease profiles and clinical courses of the 3 main types”. Circulation. 120 (13): 1203–1212. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843334. PMID 19752327. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
                                5. Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
                                6. Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
                                Diagnosis

                                Diagnosis

                                Diagnostic study of choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X-Ray Findings | Echocardiography and Ultrasound | CT-Scan Findings | MRI Findings | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

                                Treatment

                                Treatment

                                Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

                                Case Studies

                                Case Studies

                                Case #1

                                Looking for the patient version?

                                Back to the patient-friendly article

                                © 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH