Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis
For patient information, click here
To go back to the Amyloidosis landing page, click here.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]
Synonyms and keywords:
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]
Overview
In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis. There is no significant data regarding the historical perspective of amyloidosis throughout the 18th century. Rudolph Virchow and Weber are the prominent figures with substantial work on amyloidosis during the 19th century. In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis. There is no established system for the classification of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein that deposits in the different tissues and causes organ dysfunction and a wide variety of clinical syndromes. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a type of systemic amyloidosis as transthyretin (TTR) deposits can be found throughout the body. TTR results in pathologies due to misfolding, breaking apart, and deposition of the amyloid fibrils in healthy tissue. The condition mainly affects the heart. However, other organ systems, such as the nervous and musculoskeletal systems, can also be involved. There are no genes implicated in the causality of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Aging is very strongly associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is caused by the folding and/breaking apart of a normal occurring protein, transthyretin (TTR). Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be differentiated from other conditions that present with heart failure, polyneuropathy, and organomegaly. The incidence of amyloidosis is approximately 1.2 per 100,000 individuals per year worldwide. The actual incidence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis in particular is unknown. The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries. Patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis are almost always elderly (65 years of age or older). There is no racial predilection to wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Men are traditionally more commonly affected by wild-type (senile) amyloidosis than women. Aging has been implicated to be a risk factor for the development of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis, as the name suggests, is a disease of the elderly. The clinical picture of the disease corresponds to the type of organ or organ system involved. It most commonly affects the heart and hence, clinical features pertaining to cardiac pathologies, dominate the clinical course of the disease. If left untreated, wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can lead to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and eventually death. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is most commonly complicated by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The median duration of survival after diagnosis is 75 months. The diagnostic study of choice in amyloidosis is tissue biopsy of the affected organ. Congo Red staining will show apple green birefringence of the tissue sample under polarized light, and subtyping of light chains (for light chain amyloidosis) can be done via mass spectrometry. Bone marrow biopsy and organ-specific laboratory measurements are also important ancillary tests. The clinical features of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis depend on the type of organ or organ system involved. Cardiac and peripheral nerves involvement can result in clinically evident pathology. The most commonly involved organ is the heart and majority of the patients present with signs and symptoms of heart failure. Less common symptoms correspond to the involvement of organs or organ systems other than the heart. Physical examination of patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be significant for the condition in question and can also translate the variety of pathologies as a part of aging and age-related comorbidities. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a diagnosis of exclusion. Laboratory tests are conducted to evaluate for the presence or absence AL amyloid protein deposition. The absence of AL amyloid provides a strong clue towards the provisional diagnosis of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Cardiac biomarkers are the most important predictors of outcome in amyloidosis. EKG findings encountered during the evaluation of a patient with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis include pseudoinfarct pattern, poor R wave progression, atrial fibrillation, first degree AV block, and nonspecific ST-T wave abnormalities. Voltage-to-mass ratio, calculated by the sum of S wave in lead V1 plus R wave in lead V5 or V6 (SV1 + RV5 or V6) divided by the echocardiographic muscle cross-sectional area, has been implicated to have high sensitivity and specificity for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. There are no x-ray findings associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. The most commonly encountered pathology on 2D echocardiography is increased left ventricular thickness (secondary to amyloid fibrils deposition in the extracellular matrix). Advanced echocardiographic techniques (strain and strain rate imaging) can differentiate cardiomyopathy secondary to amyloidosis from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy. In regards to the evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis, EFSR has approximately 90% and 92% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. There are no CT scan findings associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. T1 sequence of CMR with the use of gadolinium can differentiate extracellular tissue thickening due to myocardial hypertrophy vs. extracellular deposition. Using pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV) can be calculated, which is a direct measurement of the cardiac interstitium. ECV expansion is a quantitative marker of the amyloid burden and can detect amyloid fibrils infiltration earlier than conventional testing. One of the benefits of T1 mapping is the fact that it does not require contrast, which is favorable in the setting of kidney disease. Bone-avid tracers, such as 99mTc-DPD (technetium-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicar-boxylic acid), 99mTc-PYP (technetium-pyrophosphate), and 99mTc-HMDP [technetium-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (Tc-HMDP)] have been implicated to have high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis and differentiating it from other cardiomyopathies with HFpEF. Combination of grade 2 or 3 cardiac uptake on a bone-avid tracer scan in the setting of absent monoclonal protein by serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), urine IFE, and serum free light chain assay is diagnostic of wild-type (senile) cardiac amyloidosis. Other diagnostic studies that help in diagnosing wild-type (senile) amyloidosis include histopathological analysis and genetic testing. There is no treatment for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis; the mainstay of therapy is supportive treatment aimed at symptoms of the disease. Supportive treatment is with diuretics, antiarrhythmics or pacemaker implantation, anticoagulation where supraventricular arrhythmias are present, and an avoidance of digoxin and calcium channel blockers. Antihypertensives are usually poorly tolerated as these patients can be profoundly hypotensive. Pharmacologic therapies aimed at stabilizing the transthyretin molecule and thus preventing amyloid formation are being actively investigated. Surgery is not the mainstay of therapy for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) implantation can be considered but a review of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) database is necessary to better evaluate the outcomes of LVAD implantation in these patients. Despite the the deteriorating cardiac function of such patients, they are rarely considered for heart transplantation due to their advanced disease presentation, age, and associated comorbidities. There are no established measures for the primary prevention of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Historical Perspective
In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis. There is no significant data regarding the historical perspective of amyloidosis throughout the 18th century. Rudolph Virchow and Weber are the prominent figures with substantial work on amyloidosis during the 19th century. In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis.
Classification
There is no established system for the classification of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Pathophysiology
Amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein that deposits in the different tissues and causes organ dysfunction and a wide variety of clinical syndromes. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a type of systemic amyloidosis as transthyretin (TTR) deposits can be found throughout the body. TTR results in pathologies due to misfolding, breaking apart, and deposition of the amyloid fibrils in healthy tissue. The condition mainly affects the heart. However, other organ systems, such as the nervous and musculoskeletal systems, can also be involved. There are no genes implicated in the causality of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Aging is very strongly associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Causes
Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is caused by the folding and/breaking apart of a normal occurring protein, transthyretin (TTR).
Differentiating Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis from Other Diseases
Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be differentiated from other conditions that present with heart failure, polyneuropathy, and organomegaly.
Epidemiology and Demographics
The incidence of amyloidosis is approximately 1.2 per 100,000 individuals per year worldwide. The actual incidence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis in particular is unknown. The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries. Patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis are almost always elderly (65 years of age or older). There is no racial predilection to wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Men are traditionally more commonly affected by wild-type (senile) amyloidosis than women.
Risk Factors
Aging has been implicated to be a risk factor for the development of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis, as the name suggests, is a disease of the elderly. The clinical picture of the disease corresponds to the type of organ or organ system involved. It most commonly affects the heart and hence, clinical features pertaining to cardiac pathologies, dominate the clinical course of the disease. If left untreated, wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can lead to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and eventually death. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is most commonly complicated by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The median duration of survival after diagnosis is 75 months.
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice
The diagnostic study of choice in amyloidosis is tissue biopsy of the affected organ. Congo Red staining will show apple green birefringence of the tissue sample under polarized light, and subtyping of light chains (for light chain amyloidosis) can be done via mass spectrometry. Bone marrow biopsy and organ-specific laboratory measurements are also important ancillary tests.
History and Symptoms
The clinical features of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis depend on the type of organ or organ system involved. Cardiac and peripheral nerves involvement can result in clinically evident pathology. The most commonly involved organ is the heart and majority of the patients present with signs and symptoms of heart failure. Less common symptoms correspond to the involvement of organs or organ systems other than the heart.
Physical Examination
Physical examination of patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be significant for the condition in question and can also translate the variety of pathologies as a part of aging and age-related comorbidities.
Laboratory Findings
Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a diagnosis of exclusion. Laboratory tests are conducted to evaluate for the presence or absence AL amyloid protein deposition. The absence of AL amyloid provides a strong clue towards the provisional diagnosis of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Cardiac biomarkers are the most important predictors of outcome in amyloidosis.
Electrocardiogram
EKG findings encountered during the evaluation of a patient with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis include pseudoinfarct pattern, poor R wave progression, atrial fibrillation, first degree AV block, and nonspecific ST-T wave abnormalities. Voltage-to-mass ratio, calculated by the sum of S wave in lead V1 plus R wave in lead V5 or V6 (SV1 + RV5 or V6) divided by the echocardiographic muscle cross-sectional area, has been implicated to have high sensitivity and specificity for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
X-ray
There are no x-ray findings associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Echocardiography and Ultrasound
The most commonly encountered pathology on 2D echocardiography is increased left ventricular thickness (secondary to amyloid fibrils deposition in the extracellular matrix). Advanced echocardiographic techniques (strain and strain rate imaging) can differentiate cardiomyopathy secondary to amyloidosis from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy. In regards to the evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis, EFSR has approximately 90% and 92% sensitivity and specificity, respectively.
CT scan
There are no CT scan findings associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
MRI
T1 sequence of CMR with the use of gadolinium can differentiate extracellular tissue thickening due to myocardial hypertrophy vs. extracellular deposition. Using pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV) can be calculated, which is a direct measurement of the cardiac interstitium. ECV expansion is a quantitative marker of the amyloid burden and can detect amyloid fibrils infiltration earlier than conventional testing. One of the benefits of T1 mapping is the fact that it does not require contrast, which is favorable in the setting of kidney disease.
Other Imaging Findings
Bone-avid tracers, such as 99mTc-DPD (technetium-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicar-boxylic acid), 99mTc-PYP (technetium-pyrophosphate), and 99mTc-HMDP [technetium-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (Tc-HMDP)] have been implicated to have high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis and differentiating it from other cardiomyopathies with HFpEF. Combination of grade 2 or 3 cardiac uptake on a bone-avid tracer scan in the setting of absent monoclonal protein by serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), urine IFE, and serum free light chain assay is diagnostic of wild-type (senile) cardiac amyloidosis.
Other Diagnostic Studies
Other diagnostic studies that help in diagnosing wild-type (senile) amyloidosis include histopathological analysis and genetic testing.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
There is no treatment for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis; the mainstay of therapy is supportive treatment aimed at symptoms of the disease. Supportive treatment is with diuretics, antiarrhythmics or pacemaker implantation, anticoagulation where supraventricular arrhythmias are present, and an avoidance of digoxin and calcium channel blockers. Antihypertensives are usually poorly tolerated as these patients can be profoundly hypotensive. Pharmacologic therapies aimed at stabilizing the transthyretin molecule and thus preventing amyloid formation are being actively investigated.
Surgery
Surgery is not the mainstay of therapy for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) implantation can be considered but a review of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) database is necessary to better evaluate the outcomes of LVAD implantation in these patients. Despite the the deteriorating cardiac function of such patients, they are rarely considered for heart transplantation due to their advanced disease presentation, age, and associated comorbidities.
Primary Prevention
There are no established measures for the primary prevention of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Secondary Prevention
There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
References
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shaghayegh Habibi, M.D.[2]
Overview
In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis. There is no significant data regarding the historical perspective of amyloidosis throughout the 18th century. Rudolph Virchow and Weber are the prominent figures with substantial work on amyloidosis during the 19th century. In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis.
Historical Perspective
- In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis.[1]
- In 1854, Rudolph Virchow introduced the term “amyloid” as a macroscopic abnormality in some tissues.[2]
- In 1867, Weber reported the first case of amyloidosis associated with multiple myeloma.[1]
- In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis.[3]
- In 1959, Cohen and Calkins used ultrathin sections of amyloidotic tissues and assessed by electron microscopy, explained the presence of non-branching fibrils with indeterminate length and variable width.[2][1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Kyle RA (June 2011). “Amyloidosis: a brief history”. Amyloid. 18 Suppl 1: 6–7. doi:10.3109/13506129.2011.574354001. PMID 21838413.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Sipe JD, Cohen AS (June 2000). “Review: history of the amyloid fibril”. J. Struct. Biol. 130 (2–3): 88–98. doi:10.1006/jsbi.2000.4221. PMID 10940217.
- ↑ Khan MF, Falk RH (November 2001). “Amyloidosis”. Postgrad Med J. 77 (913): 686–93. PMC 1742163. PMID 11677276.
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
There is no established system for the classification of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Classification
There is no established system for the classification of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
References
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]
Overview
Amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein that deposits in the different tissues and causes organ dysfunction and a wide variety of clinical syndromes. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a type of systemic amyloidosis as transthyretin (TTR) deposits can be found throughout the body. TTR results in pathologies due to misfolding, breaking apart, and deposition of the amyloid fibrils in healthy tissue. The condition mainly affects the heart. However, other organ systems, such as the nervous and musculoskeletal systems, can also be involved. There are no genes implicated in the causality of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Aging is very strongly associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Pathophysiology
- Amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein that deposits in the different tissues and causes organ dysfunction and a wide variety of clinical syndromes.[1]
- These abnormal amyloids are derived from misfolding and aggregation of normally soluble proteins.
- Amyloid deposition can disrupt tissue structure of involved organ and consequently leads to organ failure.[2]
Systemic Amyloidosis
- In systemic amyloidosis, amyloid gradually accumulates and amyloid deposition is widespread in the viscera, blood vessel walls, and different connective tissues.[3][4]
Pathogenesis
- Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is a type of systemic amyloidosis as transthyretin (TTR) deposits can be found throughout the body.[5]
- The culprit protein responsible for the disease is TTR and it is deposited in the non-mutated form, hence the name “wild-type”.
- TTR results in pathologies due to misfolding, breaking apart, and deposition of the amyloid fibrils in healthy tissue.
- The normal TTR protein, compared with the mutated form, is less likely to get deposited and cause pathology.
- This is believed to be the reason as to why this condition almost always affects the elderly (65 years of age or older).
- The condition mainly affects the heart. However, other organ systems, such as the nervous and musculoskeletal systems, can also be involved.
Genetics
- There are no genes implicated in the causality of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Associated Conditions
- Aging is very strongly associated with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Gross Pathology
Cardiac amyloid deposits are most commonly seen in the myocardium, but can also be seen in the atria, pericardium, endocardium and microvasculature.
- On gross examination, the myocardium is thicker, firm and rubbery in consistency. More than half of myocardium involvement is common in the AL type of cardiac amyloidosis.
- The size of the ventricular cavity remains unchanged, however filling of the ventricles is restricted (causing restrictive cardiomyopathy) because of stiffening of the ventricular wall as a result of deposition of amyloid material.
- Pericardial effusion and valvular dysfunction is common from pericardial and endocardial involvement. Intracardiac thrombus formation is frequently seen and may result in fatal thromboembolism.[6][7][8]
Images
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Microscopic Pathology
- Under light microscope, extracellular deposits of hyaline like amyloid material are evident. Resultant myocardial fibrosis restricts the movement of the ventricle, compromising complete filling of the ventricle during diastole.
- Amyloid deposits are also seen in the vasculature, particularly the microvasculature thereby sparing the large epicardial vessels. This leads to myocardial ischemia and tissue infarction.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
References
- ↑ Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN (June 2016). “Systemic amyloidosis”. Lancet. 387 (10038): 2641–2654. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01274-X. PMID 26719234.
- ↑ Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN (June 2016). “Systemic amyloidosis”. Lancet. 387 (10038): 2641–2654. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01274-X. PMID 26719234.
- ↑ Baker KR, Rice L (2012). “The amyloidoses: clinical features, diagnosis and treatment”. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 8 (3): 3–7. PMC 3487569. PMID 23227278.
- ↑ Pepys MB (2006). “Amyloidosis”. Annu. Rev. Med. 57: 223–41. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131243. PMID 16409147.
- ↑ Ilia G. Halatchev, Jingsheng Zheng & Jiafu Ou (2018). “Wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTRwt-CA), previously known as senile cardiac amyloidosis: clinical presentation, diagnosis, management and emerging therapies”. Journal of thoracic disease. 10 (3): 2034–2045. doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.03.134. PMID 29707360. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Nakagawa M, Tojo K, Sekijima Y, Yamazaki KH, Ikeda S (2012). “Arterial thromboembolism in senile systemic amyloidosis: report of two cases”. Amyloid : the International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Investigation : the Official Journal of the International Society of Amyloidosis. 19 (2): 118–21. doi:10.3109/13506129.2012.685131. PMID 22583098. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Van de Veire NR, Dierick J, De Sutter J (2012). “Intracardiac emboli as first presentation of cardiac AL amyloidosis”. European Heart Journal. 33 (7): 818. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr330. PMC 3345559. PMID 21893485. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Feng D, Edwards WD, Oh JK; et al. (2007). “Intracardiac thrombosis and embolism in patients with cardiac amyloidosis”. Circulation. 116 (21): 2420–6. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.697763. PMID 17984380. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is caused by the folding and/breaking apart of a normal occurring protein, transthyretin (TTR).
Causes
- Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is caused by the folding and/breaking apart of a normal occurring protein, transthyretin (TTR).[1]
References
- ↑ Ilia G. Halatchev, Jingsheng Zheng & Jiafu Ou (2018). “Wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTRwt-CA), previously known as senile cardiac amyloidosis: clinical presentation, diagnosis, management and emerging therapies”. Journal of thoracic disease. 10 (3): 2034–2045. doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.03.134. PMID 29707360. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)
Differentiating Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [3]
Overview
Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can be differentiated from other conditions that present with heart failure, polyneuropathy, and organomegaly.
Differentiating Wild-type (Senile) Amyloidosis from other Diseases
Differentials Based on Cardiac Involvement (Heart Failure)
Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis should be differentiated from other causes of heart failure:
| Differential Diagnosis | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Imaging Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Periorbital purpura: Often occurs with sneezing, coughing or with minor trauma. Indicates capillary involvement of AL type amyloidosis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differentials Based on Presentation As a Multi-Organ System Dysfunction Disorder
| Organ System Involvement | Differential Diagnosis | Causes | Clinical Features | Laboratory Findings | Gold Standard Test | Therapy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyneuropathy | ||||||
| POEMS syndrome (Demyelinating) |
|
|
||||
| Metabolic Syndrome (Axonal pathology) |
|
|
|
|||
| Vitamin Deficiencies (Axonal Pathology) |
|
|
|
| ||
| Guillain-Barre Syndrome (Demyelinating) |
|
|
|
|||
| Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) (Mixed axonal and demyelinatiing) |
|
|
|
|
||
| Multifocal Motor Neuropathy |
|
|||||
| Organ System Involvement | Differential Diagnosis | Causes | Features | Laboratory Findings | Gold Standard Test | Therapy |
| Organomegaly (Hepatosplenomegaly and Lymphadenopathy) | Malaria |
|
|
| ||
| Kala-azar |
|
|
|
|||
| Infective Hepatitis |
|
|
||||
| Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) |
|
|
||||
| Lymphoma |
|
|
||||
| Primary (AL) Amyloidosis |
|
|
|
| ||
| Gaucher’s Disease |
|
|
|
|
||
| Organ System Involvement | Differential Diagnosis | Causes | Features | Laboratory Findings | Gold Standard Test | Therapy |
| Cardiac Failure | Cardiac amyloidosis (AL and ATTRwt) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cardiac sarcoidosis |
|
|
Serum markers that have been reported as markers of sarcoidosis in general are:
|
|
| |
| Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy |
|
|
|
|
||
| Alcoholic cardiomyopathy |
|
|
|
| ||
| ST-elevation myocardial infarction |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Pericarditis |
|
|
|
|
References
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]
Overview
The incidence of amyloidosis is approximately 1.2 per 100,000 individuals per year worldwide. The actual incidence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis in particular is unknown. The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries. Patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis are almost always elderly (65 years of age or older). There is no racial predilection to wild-type (senile) amyloidosis. Men are traditionally more commonly affected by wild-type (senile) amyloidosis than women.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Incidence
- The incidence of amyloidosis is approximately 1.2 per 100,000 individuals per year worldwide.[1]
- The actual incidence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis in particular is unknown.
Prevalence
- The prevalence of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis has not been determined.
- It is estimated that approximately 25% of the people beyond the age of 80 have cardiac TTR deposition.[2]
Mortality rate
- The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries.[3]
Age
- Patients with wild-type (senile) amyloidosis are almost always elderly (65 years of age or older).
Race
- There is no racial predilection to wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Gender
- Men are traditionally more commonly affected by wild-type (senile) amyloidosis than women.[4]
References
- ↑ Khan MF, Falk RH (November 2001). “Amyloidosis”. Postgrad Med J. 77 (913): 686–93. PMC 1742163. PMID 11677276.
- ↑ G. G. 3rd Cornwell, W. L. Murdoch, R. A. Kyle, P. Westermark & P. Pitkanen (1983). “Frequency and distribution of senile cardiovascular amyloid. A clinicopathologic correlation”. The American journal of medicine. 75 (4): 618–623. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(83)90443-6. PMID 6624768. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Pepys MB (2006). “Amyloidosis”. Annu. Rev. Med. 57: 223–41. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131243. PMID 16409147.
- ↑ Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]
Overview
Aging has been implicated to be a risk factor for the development of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Risk Factors
Aging has been implicated to be a risk factor for the development of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
References
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]
Overview
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
Screening
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
References
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]
Overview
Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis, as the name suggests, is a disease of the elderly. The clinical picture of the disease corresponds to the type of organ or organ system involved. It most commonly affects the heart and hence, clinical features pertaining to cardiac pathologies, dominate the clinical course of the disease. If left untreated, wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can lead to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and eventually death. Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is most commonly complicated by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The median duration of survival after diagnosis is 75 months.
Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis
Natural History
- In amyloidosis, insoluble fibrils of amyloid are deposited in the organs, causing organ dysfunction and eventually death.[1]
- Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis, as the name suggests, is a disease of the elderly.
- The clinical picture of the disease corresponds to the type of organ or organ system involved.
- It most commonly affects the heart and hence, clinical features pertaining to cardiac pathologies, dominate the clinical course of the disease.
- The deposition of transthyretin (TTR) in the heart causes it to start functionally failing.[2]
- The constellation of signs and symptoms of a TTR affected heart can mimic heart failure due to old age, and can thus mask the systemic involvement of wild-type (senile) amyloidosis.
- If left untreated, wild-type (senile) amyloidosis can lead to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and eventually death.[3]
Complications
- Wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is most commonly complicated by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).[3]
- Other complications include:
Prognosis
- In comparison with AL amyloidosis, the severity of heart failure in wild-type (senile) amyloidosis is less.[5]
- The median duration of survival after diagnosis is 75 months.[6]
References
- ↑ Baker KR, Rice L (2012). “The amyloidoses: clinical features, diagnosis and treatment”. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 8 (3): 3–7. PMC 3487569. PMID 23227278.
- ↑ Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ 3.0 3.1 Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Claudio Rapezzi, Giampaolo Merlini, Candida C. Quarta, Letizia Riva, Simone Longhi, Ornella Leone, Fabrizio Salvi, Paolo Ciliberti, Francesca Pastorelli, Elena Biagini, Fabio Coccolo, Robin M. T. Cooke, Letizia Bacchi-Reggiani, Diego Sangiorgi, Alessandra Ferlini, Michele Cavo, Elena Zamagni, Maria Luisa Fonte, Giovanni Palladini, Francesco Salinaro, Francesco Musca, Laura Obici, Angelo Branzi & Stefano Perlini (2009). “Systemic cardiac amyloidoses: disease profiles and clinical courses of the 3 main types”. Circulation. 120 (13): 1203–1212. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843334. PMID 19752327. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Belinda Ng, Lawreen H. Connors, Ravin Davidoff, Martha Skinner & Rodney H. Falk (2005). “Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis”. Archives of internal medicine. 165 (12): 1425–1429. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. PMID 15983293. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic study of choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X-Ray Findings | Echocardiography and Ultrasound | CT-Scan Findings | MRI Findings | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH








