Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome

Template:Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Synonyms and keywords: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease; Veno-occlusive disease of the liver; Obliterative endophlebitis; blue liver syndrome; toxic sinusoidal injury

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is characterized by tender hepatomegaly, ascites, and weight gain. It is most commonly a complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The incidence and severity of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome depends on the conditioning regimen used and presence of pre-existing liver disease. There is no established system for the classification of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. However, it can be classified on the basis of severity as mild, moderate and severe. It is thought that pre-existing liver disease increases the risk of developing sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) due to impairment of drug metabolism which predisposes to the endothelial injury. The deposition of fibrinogen and factor VIII within the sinusoids leads to their dilation and congestion by erythrocytes. The progressive occlusion of venules leads to widespread zonal liver disruption and centrilobular hemorrhagic necrosis. The two established criteria for the clinical diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are Baltimore criteria and modified Seattle criteria. Patients with a mild or moderate form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome require no specific therapy and can be managed with supportive care alone. If left untreated, the severe form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is characterized by high mortality and progression to multiorgan failure. The most accurate method to confirm the diagnosis and evaluate the severity of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is the measurement of the hepatic venous gradient pressure (HVGP). The patient with suspected sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) requires the following lab studies: complete blood count, liver function tests, complete metabolic profile and viral hepatitis serologies. A transjugular liver biopsy can be helpful in the diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Common findings on liver biopsy include sinusoidal dilation and congestion by erythrocytes and thrombi within the terminal hepatic venules. The management of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome depends on the severity of the disease. Supportive care is the mainstay of therapy for mild and moderate sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. The severe form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome needs defibrotide (thrombolytic agent) along with supportive care. Surgical treatment of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is reserved for patients who do not respond to supportive treatment or defibrotide. The surgical options include transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and liver transplantation. Primary preventive measures of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome include minimizing risks related to the transplant process such as the source of the graft (allogeneic greater than autologous), choice of chemotherapy and use of antimicrobials. The exposure to the hepatotoxic agents should be minimized and preexisting liver diseases should be managed. The prophylaxis for graft vs host disease should be considered.

Historical Perspective

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was first described in 1905 as endophelibitis of the terminal hepatic veins. Ionizing radiations as a cause of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was identified in the 1960’s and bone marrow transplant in the 1970’s. However, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome or hepatic veno-occlusive disease was a well-established concept by the mid-1960’s.

Classification

There is no established system for the classification of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. However, it can be classified on the basis of severity as mild, moderate and severe.

Pathophysiology

The development of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome begins with the injury to hepatic venous endothelium. It is thought that preexisting liver disease increases the risk of developing sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) due to impairment of drug metabolism which predisposes to the endothelial injury. The endothelial cells in patients with hepatitis may have abnormal expression of adhesion molecules and pro-coagulant factors. The deposition of fibrinogen and factor VIII within the sinusoids leads to their dilation and congestion by erythrocytes. The progressive occlusion of venules leads to widespread zonal liver disruption and centrilobular hemorrhagic necrosis. Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is mainly seen in patients of hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Causes

The most common cause of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is hematopoietic cell transplantation. Other less common causes include chemotherapeutic agents and pyrrolizidine alkaloids.

Differentiating Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome from Other Diseases

The differential diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome includes other causes of hepatic failure that may have abnormal liver function tests such as increased conjugated bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase or a clinical presentation as right upper quadrant abdominal pain, jaundice or ascites.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome depends on the presence of risk factors, chemotherapy regimen and the clinical criteria used for the diagnosis. The incidence after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant ranges from a low of 10,000 persons per 100,000 persons to a high of 15,000 persons per 100,000 persons. The incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after autologous hematopoietic cell transplant is below 5,000 persons per 100,000 persons.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are stem cell transplantation, preexisting liver dysfunction and high-dose conditioning regimens.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Patients with a mild or moderate form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome require no specific therapy and can be managed with supportive care alone.The mild and moderate form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome has a good prognosis. If left untreated, the severe form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is characterized by high mortality and progression to multiorgan failure.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic study of choice

The two established criteria for the clinical diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are Baltimore criteria and modified Seattle criteria. The most accurate method to confirm the diagnosis and evaluate the severity of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is the measurement of the hepatic venous gradient pressure (HVGP).

History and Symptoms

Patients with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome may have a positive history of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or pre-existing liver disease. Common symptoms of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome include tender hepatomegaly, weight gain and ascites.

Physical Examination

Common physical examination findings of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome include abdominal pain or distention, tender hepatomegaly, signs of ascites and jaundice.

Laboratory Findings

The patient with suspected sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) requires the following lab studies: complete blood count, liver function tests, complete metabolic profile and viral hepatitis serologies.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.

X-Ray

There are no x-ray findings associated with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.

CT

CT scan findings suggestive of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome include hepatomegaly, nutmeg liver, portal vein dilatation, ascites.

MRI

The MRI contrast studies for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome will show a diffuse hypointense reticular pattern.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound can be helpful in the diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Common findings on ultrasound may include: hepatomegaly, heterogeneous echotexture and abnormal portal vein waveform.

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.

Other Diagnostic Studies

A transjugular liver biopsy can be helpful in the diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Common findings on liver biopsy include sinusoidal dilation and congestion by erythrocytes and thrombi within the terminal hepatic venules.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The management of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome depends on the severity of the disease. However, supportive care is the mainstay of therapy for mild and moderate sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. The severe form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome needs defibrotide (thrombolytic agent) along with supportive care. Patients are advised to avoid supplements and medications that are linked to hepatic injury.

Surgery

Surgical treatment of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is reserved for patients who do not respond to supportive treatment or defibrotide. The surgical options include transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and liver transplantation.

Prevention

Primary preventive measures of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome include minimizing risks related to the transplant process such as the source of the graft (allogeneic greater than autologous), choice of chemotherapy and use of antimicrobials. The exposure to the hepatotoxic agents should be minimized and preexisting liver diseases should be managed. The prophylaxis for graft vs host disease should be considered.

References

Template:WS Template:WH

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was first described in 1905 as endophelibitis of the terminal hepatic veins. Ionizing radiations as a cause of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was identified in the 1960’s and bone marrow transplant in the 1970’s. However, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome or hepatic veno-occlusive disease was a well-established concept by the mid-1960’s.

Historical Perspective

References

  1. Fan CQ, Crawford JM (2014). “Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (hepatic veno-occlusive disease)”. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 4 (4): 332–46. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2014.10.002. PMC 4298625. PMID 25755580.
  2. Dormoy A, Urlacher A, Tongio MM (1990). “A nucleotide substitution in a Bg1 II site is responsible for the RFLP discrimination between DPw4 and DPa”. Tissue Antigens. 36 (3): 129–35. PMID 1980552.
  3. STIRLING GA, BRAS B, URQUHART AE (1962). “The early lesions in veno-occlusive disease of the liver”. Arch. Dis. Child. 37: 535–8. PMC 2012933. PMID 13984193.
  4. GIBSON JB (1960). “Chiari’s disease and the Budd-Chiari syndrome”. J Pathol Bacteriol. 79: 381–401. PMID 13827970.
  5. Harper G (1992). “Relief work: don’t forget Somalia. Interview by Charlotte Alderman”. Nurs Stand. 7 (1): 18–9. PMID 1419702.

Template:WS Template:WH

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

There is no established system for the classification of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. However, it can be classified on the basis of severity as mild, moderate and severe.

Classification

There is no established system for the classification of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. However, it can be classified on the basis of severity as mild, moderate and severe.[1]

Parameters Mild Moderate Severe
Serum total bilirubin
  • <5 mg/dL
  • < (5.1 to 8 mg/dL
  • >8 mg/dL
Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
  • <3 x normal
  • 3 to 8 x normal
  • >8 x normal
Weight above baseline
  • <2 percent
  • 2 to 5 percent
  • >5 percent
Serum creatinine
  • Normal
  • <2 x normal
  • >2 x normal
Rate of change Slow (over 6–7 d) (over 4–5 d) Rapid (over2–3 d)

References

  1. Chao N (2014). “How I treat sinusoidal obstruction syndrome”. Blood. 123 (26): 4023–6. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-03-551630. PMID 24833355.

Template:WS Template:WH

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

The development of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome begins with the injury to hepatic venous endothelium. It is thought that preexisting liver disease increases the risk of developing sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) due to impairment of drug metabolism which predisposes to the endothelial injury. The endothelial cells in patients with hepatitis may have abnormal expression of adhesion molecules and pro-coagulant factors. The deposition of fibrinogen and factor VIII within the sinusoids leads to their dilation and congestion by erythrocytes. The progressive occlusion of venules leads to widespread zonal liver disruption and centrilobular hemorrhagic necrosis. Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is mainly seen in patients of hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Pathogenesis

Originally by Frevert U, Engelmann S, Zougbédé S, Stange J, Ng B, et al https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hepatic_structure2.svg


Gross Pathology

  • On gross pathology, the liver has diffusely mottled appearance with areas of congestion and normal appearing hepatic parenchyma.[1]

Microscopic Pathology

The most important histopathological characteristics of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are:[2][3][4]

References

  1. Seo AN, Kim H (2014). “Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy”. Clin Mol Hepatol. 20 (1): 81–4. doi:10.3350/cmh.2014.20.1.81. PMC 3992335. PMID 24757663.
  2. McDonald GB, Sharma P, Matthews DE, Shulman HM, Thomas ED (1984). “Venocclusive disease of the liver after bone marrow transplantation: diagnosis, incidence, and predisposing factors”. Hepatology. 4 (1): 116–22. PMID 6363247.
  3. Shulman HM, Gown AM, Nugent DJ (1987). “Hepatic veno-occlusive disease after bone marrow transplantation. Immunohistochemical identification of the material within occluded central venules”. Am. J. Pathol. 127 (3): 549–58. PMC 1899766. PMID 2438942.
  4. Shulman HM, Fisher LB, Schoch HG, Henne KW, McDonald GB (1994). “Veno-occlusive disease of the liver after marrow transplantation: histological correlates of clinical signs and symptoms”. Hepatology. 19 (5): 1171–81. PMID 8175139.

Template:WS Template:WH

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

The most common cause of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is hematopoietic cell transplantation. Other less common causes include chemotherapeutic agents and pyrrolizidine alkaloids.

Causes

Common causes

Less common causes

Other less common causes include:[3]

References

  1. McDonald GB, Hinds MS, Fisher LD, Schoch HG, Wolford JL, Banaji M, Hardin BJ, Shulman HM, Clift RA (1993). “Veno-occlusive disease of the liver and multiorgan failure after bone marrow transplantation: a cohort study of 355 patients”. Ann. Intern. Med. 118 (4): 255–67. PMID 8420443.
  2. Kumar S, DeLeve LD, Kamath PS, Tefferi A (2003). “Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (sinusoidal obstruction syndrome) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation”. Mayo Clin Proc. 78 (5): 589–98. doi:10.4065/78.5.589. PMID 12744547.
  3. Valla DC, Cazals-Hatem D (2016). “Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome”. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 40 (4): 378–85. doi:10.1016/j.clinre.2016.01.006. PMID 27038846.

Template:WS Template:WH

Differentiating Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome from Other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

The differential diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome includes other causes of hepatic failure that may have abnormal liver function tests such as increased conjugated bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase or a clinical presentation as right upper quadrant abdominal pain, jaundice or ascites.

Differential Diagnosis

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome should be differentiated from other causes of hepatic failure like Budd-Chiari syndrome, viral hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, splenic vein thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis and inferior vena cava obstruction that may have a similar presentation with right upper quadrant abdominal pain and ascites. The differential diagnosis is as follows:

Condition Differentiating signs and symptoms Differentiating Tests
Budd-Chiari Syndrome
Cirrhosis

Ultrasound findings in cirrhosis are as follows:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

Abdominal MRI may also be helpful in the diagnosis of portal hypertension. Findings on MRI suggestive of cirrhosis with portal hypertension include:[9][10][11][12]

Transient elastography and the Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) technique are well-established methods for the staging of fibrosis in various liver diseases: [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] 

  • The FibroScan (transient elastography) uses elastic waves to determine liver stiffness which theoretically may be converted into a liver score.
  • The FibroScan produces an ultrasound image of the liver (from 20-80mm) along with a pressure reading (in kPa).
  • Transient elastography is much faster than a biopsy (usually lasts 2.5-5 minutes) and is completely painless.
  • Findings on transient elastography may show reasonable correlation with the severity of cirrhosis:[24][25]
Splenic vein thrombosis Signs and symptoms of:
Portal vein thrombosis
Schistosomiasis
Inferior vena cava obstruction
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia None
Idiopathic portal hypertension (hepatoportal sclerosis) None

Abbreviations: RUQ= Right upper quadrant of the abdomen, LUQ= Left upper quadrant, LLQ= Left lower quadrant, RLQ= Right lower quadrant, LFT= Liver function test, SIRS= Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ERCP= Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, IV= Intravenous, N= Normal, AMA= Anti mitochondrial antibodies, LDH= Lactate dehydrogenase, GI= Gastrointestinal, CXR= Chest X ray, IgA= Immunoglobulin A, IgG= Immunoglobulin G, IgM= Immunoglobulin M, CT= Computed tomography, PMN= Polymorphonuclear cells, ESR= Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP= C-reactive protein, TS= Transferrin saturation, SF= Serum Ferritin, SMA= Superior mesenteric artery, SMV= Superior mesenteric vein, ECG= Electrocardiogram

Disease Clinical manifestations Diagnosis Comments
Symptoms Signs
Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging
Acute suppurative cholangitis RUQ + + + + + + + N
  • Abnormal LFT
  • WBC >10,000
  • Ultrasound shows biliary dilatation/stents/tumor
  • Septic shock occurs with features of SIRS
Acute cholangitis RUQ + + N
  • Ultrasound shows biliary dilatation/stents/tumor
  • Biliary drainage (ERCP) + IV antibiotics
Acute cholecystitis RUQ + + + Hypoactive Ultrasound shows:
  • Gallstone
  • Inflammation
Acute pancreatitis Epigastric + + ± ± N
  • Ultrasound shows evidence of inflammation
  • CT scan shows severity of pancreatitis
  • Pain radiation to back
Chronic pancreatitis Epigastric ± ± + + N
  • Increased amylase / lipase
  • Increased stool fat content
  • Pancreatic function test
CT scan
  • Calcification
  • Pseudocyst
  • Dilation of main pancreatic duct
  • Predisposes to pancreatic cancer
Pancreatic carcinoma Epigastric + + + + N

Skin manifestations may include:

Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Primary biliary cirrhosis RUQ/Epigastric + N
  • Increased AMA level, abnormal LFTs
  • ERCP
  • Pruritis
Primary sclerosing cholangitis RUQ + + N ERCP and MRCP shows
  • Multiple segmental strictures
  • Mural irregularities
  • Biliary dilatation and diverticula
  • Distortion of biliary tree
  • The risk of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis is 400 times higher than the risk in the general population.
Cholelithiasis RUQ/Epigastric ± ± ± Normal to hyperactive for dislodged stone
  • Fatty food intolerance
Gastrointestinal perforation Diffuse + ± ± + + + ± Hyperactive/hypoactive
  • WBC> 10,000
Inflammatory bowel disease Diffuse ± ± + + + Normal or hyperactive

Extra intestinal findings:

Whipple’s disease Diffuse ± ± + + ± N Endoscopy is used to confirm diagnosis.

Images used to find complications

Extra intestinal findings:
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Viral hepatitis RUQ + + + Positive in Hep A and E + Positive in fulminant hepatitis Positive in acute + N
  • Abnormal LFTs
  • Viral serology
  • US
  • Hep A and E have fecal-oral route of transmission
  • Hep B and C transmits via blood transfusion and sexual contact.
Liver abscess RUQ + + + + ± + + + ± Normal or hypoactive
  • US
  • CT
Hepatocellular carcinoma/Metastasis RUQ + + +
  • Normal
  • Hyperactive if obstruction present
  • US
  • CT
  • Liver biopsy

Other symptoms:

Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Budd-Chiari syndrome RUQ ± ± Positive in liver failure leading to varices N
Findings on CT scan suggestive of Budd-Chiari syndrome include:
Ascitic fluid examination shows:
Cirrhosis RUQ + + + + N US
  • Stigmata of liver disease
  • Cruveilhier- Baumgarten murmur
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Diffuse + Positive in cirrhotic patients + ± + + Hypoactive
  • Ascitic fluid PMN>250 cells/mm³
  • Culture: Positive for single organism
  • Ultrasound for evaluation of liver cirrhosis
Biliary colic RUQ + + N
  • Ultrasound

Disease Clinical manifestations Diagnosis Comments
Symptoms Signs
Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging
Portal vein thrombosis Diffuse ± + ± + + ± N
  • Usually normal
Chronic pancreatitis Epigastric ± ± + + N
  • Increased amylase / lipase
  • Increased stool fat content
  • Pancreatic function test
CT scan
  • Predisposes to pancreatic cancer
Pancreatic carcinoma Epigastric + + + + N

Skin manifestations may include:

Dumping syndrome Lower and then diffuse + + + + Hyperactive
  • Upper GI series
  • Gastric emptying study
  • Postgastrectomy
Disease Abdominal Pain Fever Rigors and chills Nausea or vomiting Jaundice Constipation Diarrhea Weight loss GI bleeding Hypo-

tension

Guarding Rebound Tenderness Bowel sounds Lab Findings Imaging Comments
Acute appendicitis Starts in epigastrium, migrates to RLQ + Positive in pyogenic appendicitis + ± Positive in perforated appendicitis + + Hypoactive
  • Ct scan
  • Ultrasound
  • Positive Rovsing sign
  • Positive Obturator sign
  • Positive Iliopsoas sign
Acute diverticulitis LLQ + ± + + ± + Positive in perforated diverticulitis + + Hypoactive
  • CT scan
  • Ultrasound
Infective colitis Diffuse + ± + + Positive in fulminant colitis ± ± Hyperactive CT scan
  • Bowel wall thickening
  • Edema
Viral hepatitis RUQ + + + Positive in Hep A and E + Positive in fulminant hepatitis Positive in acute + N
  • Abnormal LFTs
  • Viral serology
  • US
  • Hep A and E have fecal-oral route of transmission
  • Hep B and C transmits via blood transfusion and sexual contact.
Liver abscess RUQ + + + + ± + + + ± Normal or hypoactive
  • US
  • CT
Mesenteric ischemia Periumbilical Positive if bowel becomes gangrenous + + + + Positive if bowel becomes gangrenous Positive if bowel becomes gangrenous Hyperactive to absent CT angiography
  • SMA or SMV thrombosis
  • Also known as abdominal angina that worsens with eating
Acute ischemic colitis Diffuse + ± + + + + + + + Hyperactive then absent Abdominal x-ray

CT scan

  • Double halo appearance, thumbprinting
  • Thickening of bowel
  • May lead to shock
Pneumonia RUQ/LUQ + + + ± + Normal or hypoactive
  • Shortness of breath
  • Cough

Abbreviations: RUQ= Right upper quadrant of the abdomen, LUQ= Left upper quadrant, LLQ= Left lower quadrant, RLQ= Right lower quadrant, LFT= Liver function test, SIRS= Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ERCP= Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, IV= Intravenous, N= Normal, AMA= Anti mitochondrial antibodies, LDH= Lactate dehydrogenase, GI= Gastrointestinal, CXR= Chest X ray, IgA= Immunoglobulin A, IgG= Immunoglobulin G, IgM= Immunoglobulin M, CT= Computed tomography, PMN= Polymorphonuclear cells, ESR= Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP= C-reactive protein, TS= Transferrin saturation, SF= Serum Ferritin, SMA= Superior mesenteric artery, SMV= Superior mesenteric vein, ECG= Electrocardiogram, MRA= MR angiography, CEUS=Contrast enhanced ultrasound

References

  1. Udell JA, Wang CS, Tinmouth J, FitzGerald JM, Ayas NT, Simel DL, Schulzer M, Mak E, Yoshida EM (2012). “Does this patient with liver disease have cirrhosis?”. JAMA. 307 (8): 832–42. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.186. PMID 22357834.
  2. Becker CD, Scheidegger J, Marincek B (1986). “Hepatic vein occlusion: morphologic features on computed tomography and ultrasonography”. Gastrointest Radiol. 11 (4): 305–11. PMID 3533689.
  3. Di Lelio A, Cestari C, Lomazzi A, Beretta L (1989). “Cirrhosis: diagnosis with sonographic study of the liver surface”. Radiology. 172 (2): 389–92. doi:10.1148/radiology.172.2.2526349. PMID 2526349.
  4. Sanford NL, Walsh P, Matis C, Baddeley H, Powell LW (1985). “Is ultrasonography useful in the assessment of diffuse parenchymal liver disease?”. Gastroenterology. 89 (1): 186–91. PMID 3891495.
  5. Giorgio A, Amoroso P, Lettieri G, Fico P, de Stefano G, Finelli L, Scala V, Tarantino L, Pierri P, Pesce G (1986). “Cirrhosis: value of caudate to right lobe ratio in diagnosis with US”. Radiology. 161 (2): 443–5. doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3532188. PMID 3532188.
  6. Simonovský V (1999). “The diagnosis of cirrhosis by high resolution ultrasound of the liver surface”. Br J Radiol. 72 (853): 29–34. doi:10.1259/bjr.72.853.10341686. PMID 10341686.
  7. Trinchet JC, Chaffaut C, Bourcier V, Degos F, Henrion J, Fontaine H, Roulot D, Mallat A, Hillaire S, Cales P, Ollivier I, Vinel JP, Mathurin P, Bronowicki JP, Vilgrain V, N’Kontchou G, Beaugrand M, Chevret S (2011). “Ultrasonographic surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: a randomized trial comparing 3- and 6-month periodicities”. Hepatology. 54 (6): 1987–97. doi:10.1002/hep.24545. PMID 22144108.
  8. “EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma”. J. Hepatol. 56 (4): 908–43. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001. PMID 22424438.
  9. Procopet, Bogdan; Berzigotti, Annalisa (2017). “Diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension: imaging, non-invasive markers of fibrosis and liver biopsy”. Gastroenterology Report. 5 (2): 79–89. doi:10.1093/gastro/gox012. ISSN 2052-0034.
  10. Aagaard, J; Jensen, LI; Sorensen, TI; Christensen, U; Burcharth, F (1982). “Recanalized umbilical vein in portal hypertension”. American Journal of Roentgenology. 139 (6): 1107–1110. doi:10.2214/ajr.139.6.1107. ISSN 0361-803X.
  11. Cho, K C; Patel, Y D; Wachsberg, R H; Seeff, J (1995). “Varices in portal hypertension: evaluation with CT”. RadioGraphics. 15 (3): 609–622. doi:10.1148/radiographics.15.3.7624566. ISSN 0271-5333.
  12. Bandali, Murad Feroz; Mirakhur, Anirudh; Lee, Edward Wolfgang; Ferris, Mollie Clarke; Sadler, David James; Gray, Robin Ritchie; Wong, Jason Kam (2017). “Portal hypertension: Imaging of portosystemic collateral pathways and associated image-guided therapy”. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 23 (10): 1735. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1735. ISSN 1007-9327.
  13. Castera L, Pinzani M (2010). “Biopsy and non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis: does it take two to tango?”. Gut. 59 (7): 861–6. doi:10.1136/gut.2010.214650. PMID 20581229.
  14. Friedrich-Rust M, Nierhoff J, Lupsor M, Sporea I, Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Strobel D, Takahashi H, Yoneda M, Suda T, Zeuzem S, Herrmann E (2012). “Performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a pooled meta-analysis”. J. Viral Hepat. 19 (2): e212–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01537.x. PMID 22239521.
  15. Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Martens S, Sarrazin C, Bojunga J, Zeuzem S, Herrmann E (2008). “Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis”. Gastroenterology. 134 (4): 960–74. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.034. PMID 18395077.
  16. Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A, Christidis C, Mal F, Kazemi F, de Lédinghen V, Marcellin P, Dhumeaux D, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M (2005). “Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C”. Hepatology. 41 (1): 48–54. doi:10.1002/hep.20506. PMID 15690481.
  17. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, Christidis C, Ziol M, Poulet B, Kazemi F, Beaugrand M, Palau R (2003). “Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis”. Ultrasound Med Biol. 29 (12): 1705–13. PMID 14698338.
  18. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J, Calliada F, Cantisani V, Correas JM, D’Onofrio M, Drakonaki EE, Fink M, Friedrich-Rust M, Gilja OH, Havre RF, Jenssen C, Klauser AS, Ohlinger R, Saftoiu A, Schaefer F, Sporea I, Piscaglia F (2013). “EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology”. Ultraschall Med. 34 (2): 169–84. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1335205. PMID 23558397.
  19. “EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis”. J. Hepatol. 63 (1): 237–64. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006. PMID 25911335.
  20. Castera L, Bedossa P (2011). “How to assess liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: serum markers or transient elastography vs. liver biopsy?”. Liver Int. 31 Suppl 1: 13–7. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02380.x. PMID 21205132.
  21. Chou R, Wasson N (2013). “Blood tests to diagnose fibrosis or cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review”. Ann. Intern. Med. 158 (11): 807–20. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00005. PMID 23732714.
  22. Khallafi H, Qureshi K (2015). “Imaging Based Methods of Liver Fibrosis Assessment in Viral Hepatitis: A Practical Approach”. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2015: 809289. doi:10.1155/2015/809289. PMC 4686715. PMID 26779260.
  23. Singh S, Fujii LL, Murad MH, Wang Z, Asrani SK, Ehman RL, Kamath PS, Talwalkar JA (2013). “Liver stiffness is associated with risk of decompensation, liver cancer, and death in patients with chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11 (12): 1573–84.e1–2, quiz e88–9. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.034. PMC 3900882. PMID 23954643.
  24. Foucher J, Chanteloup E, Vergniol J; et al. (2006). “Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study”. Gut. 55 (3): 403–8. doi:10.1136/gut.2005.069153. PMID 16020491.
  25. Xie L, Chen X, Guo Q, Dong Y, Guang Y, Zhang X (2012). “Real-time elastography for diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B”. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine : Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 31 (7): 1053–60. PMID 22733854.

Template:WS Template:WH

Epidemiology and Demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

The incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome depends on the presence of risk factors, chemotherapy regimen and the clinical criteria used for the diagnosis. The incidence after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant ranges from a low of 10,000 persons per 100,000 persons to a high of 15,000 persons per 100,000 persons. The incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after autologous hematopoietic cell transplant is below 5,000 persons per 100,000 persons.

Epidemiology

Incidence

  • Incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome depends on the presence of risk factors, chemotherapy regimen used and the clinical criteria used for the diagnosis.[1]
  • The incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant ranges from a low of 10,000 persons per 100,000 persons to a high of 15,000 persons per 100,000 persons.[2]
  • The incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after autologous hematopoietic cell transplant is below 5,000 persons per 100,000 persons.[3]

References

  1. Coppell JA, Richardson PG, Soiffer R, Martin PL, Kernan NA, Chen A, Guinan E, Vogelsang G, Krishnan A, Giralt S, Revta C, Carreau NA, Iacobelli M, Carreras E, Ruutu T, Barbui T, Antin JH, Niederwieser D (2010). “Hepatic veno-occlusive disease following stem cell transplantation: incidence, clinical course, and outcome”. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 16 (2): 157–68. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.08.024. PMC 3018714. PMID 19766729.
  2. McDonald GB, Hinds MS, Fisher LD, Schoch HG, Wolford JL, Banaji M, Hardin BJ, Shulman HM, Clift RA (1993). “Veno-occlusive disease of the liver and multiorgan failure after bone marrow transplantation: a cohort study of 355 patients”. Ann. Intern. Med. 118 (4): 255–67. PMID 8420443.
  3. Fan CQ, Crawford JM (2014). “Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (hepatic veno-occlusive disease)”. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 4 (4): 332–46. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2014.10.002. PMC 4298625. PMID 25755580.

Template:WS Template:WH

Risk Factors

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

Common risk factors in the development of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are stem cell transplantation, preexisting liver dysfunction and high-dose conditioning regimens.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are:[1][2][3]

References

  1. Kumar S, DeLeve LD, Kamath PS, Tefferi A (2003). “Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (sinusoidal obstruction syndrome) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation”. Mayo Clin Proc. 78 (5): 589–98. doi:10.4065/78.5.589. PMID 12744547.
  2. McDonald GB, Hinds MS, Fisher LD, Schoch HG, Wolford JL, Banaji M, Hardin BJ, Shulman HM, Clift RA (1993). “Veno-occlusive disease of the liver and multiorgan failure after bone marrow transplantation: a cohort study of 355 patients”. Ann. Intern. Med. 118 (4): 255–67. PMID 8420443.
  3. Carreras E, Bertz H, Arcese W, Vernant JP, Tomás JF, Hagglund H, Bandini G, Esperou H, Russell J, de la Rubia J, Di Girolamo G, Demuynck H, Hartmann O, Clausen J, Ruutu T, Leblond V, Iriondo A, Bosi A, Ben-Bassat I, Koza V, Gratwohl A, Apperley JF (1998). “Incidence and outcome of hepatic veno-occlusive disease after blood or marrow transplantation: a prospective cohort study of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Chronic Leukemia Working Party”. Blood. 92 (10): 3599–604. PMID 9808553.

Template:WS Template:WH

Screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.

References

Template:WS Template:WH

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2]

Overview

Patients with a mild or moderate form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome require no specific therapy and can be managed with supportive care alone.The mild and moderate form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome has a good prognosis. If left untreated, the severe form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is characterized by high mortality and progression to multiorgan failure.

Natural History

Complications

Complications that can develop as a result of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are:[2][3][4][5]

Prognosis

  • Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is considered mild, moderate or severe based on the clinical course during the first three months of hematopoietic cell transplantation.[6]
  • Patients with a mild or moderate form of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome require no specific therapy and can be managed with supportive care alone and progressively resolves over a 2- to 3-week period.[7]
  • Patients with the severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome have a high rate of mortality and can progress to multiorgan failure.[8]

Morbidity and mortality is associated with following factors:[9][10][11][12]

References

  1. Coppell JA, Richardson PG, Soiffer R, Martin PL, Kernan NA, Chen A; et al. (2010). “Hepatic veno-occlusive disease following stem cell transplantation: incidence, clinical course, and outcome”. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 16 (2): 157–68. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.08.024. PMC 3018714. PMID 19766729.
  2. Grus T, Lambert L, Grusová G, Banerjee R, Burgetová A (2017). “Budd-Chiari Syndrome”. Prague Med Rep. 118 (2–3): 69–80. doi:10.14712/23362936.2017.6. PMID 28922103.
  3. Lin M, Zhang F, Wang Y, Zhang B, Zhang W, Zou X, Zhang M, Zhuge Y (2017). “Liver cirrhosis caused by chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome”. Medicine (Baltimore). 96 (34): e7425. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000007425. PMC 5571988. PMID 28834866.
  4. Lane ER, Hsu EK, Murray KF (2015). “Management of ascites in children”. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 9 (10): 1281–92. doi:10.1586/17474124.2015.1083419. PMID 26325252.
  5. Johnson DB, Savani BN (2012). “How can we reduce hepatic veno-occlusive disease-related deaths after allogeneic stem cell transplantation?”. Exp Hematol. 40 (7): 513–7. doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2012.04.004. PMID 22542577.
  6. McDonald GB, Hinds MS, Fisher LD, Schoch HG, Wolford JL, Banaji M, Hardin BJ, Shulman HM, Clift RA (1993). “Veno-occlusive disease of the liver and multiorgan failure after bone marrow transplantation: a cohort study of 355 patients”. Ann. Intern. Med. 118 (4): 255–67. PMID 8420443.
  7. Fan CQ, Crawford JM (2014). “Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (hepatic veno-occlusive disease)”. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 4 (4): 332–46. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2014.10.002. PMC 4298625. PMID 25755580.
  8. Lopes JA, Jorge S (2011). “Acute kidney injury following HCT: incidence, risk factors and outcome”. Bone Marrow Transplant. 46 (11): 1399–408. doi:10.1038/bmt.2011.46. PMID 21383682.
  9. Tabbara IA, Ghazal CD, Ghazal HH (1996). “Early drop in protein C and antithrombin III is a predictor for the development of venoocclusive disease in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation”. J Hematother. 5 (1): 79–84. doi:10.1089/scd.1.1996.5.79. PMID 8646485.
  10. Salat C, Holler E, Kolb HJ, Reinhardt B, Pihusch R, Wilmanns W, Hiller E (1997). “Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 confirms the diagnosis of hepatic veno-occlusive disease in patients with hyperbilirubinemia after bone marrow transplantation”. Blood. 89 (6): 2184–8. PMID 9058743.
  11. Faioni EM, Krachmalnicoff A, Bearman SI, Federici AB, Decarli A, Gianni AM, McDonald GB, Mannucci PM (1993). “Naturally occurring anticoagulants and bone marrow transplantation: plasma protein C predicts the development of venocclusive disease of the liver”. Blood. 81 (12): 3458–62. PMID 8507881.
  12. Scrobohaci ML, Drouet L, Monem-Mansi A, Devergie A, Baudin B, D’Agay MF, Gluckman E (1991). “Liver veno-occlusive disease after bone marrow transplantation changes in coagulation parameters and endothelial markers”. Thromb. Res. 63 (5): 509–19. PMID 1755004.

Template:WS Template:WH

Diagnosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Diagnostic criteria | Electrocardiogram | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Template:WH Template:WS

Looking for the patient version?

Back to the patient-friendly article

© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH