Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor
For patient information, click here
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]; Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]
Synonyms and keywords: Malignant neurolemmoma, Neurofibrosarcoma, Neurosarcoma, Malignant schwannoma
Overview
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a form of cancer of the connective tissue surrounding nerves. On gross pathology, a large firm mass with necrosis and hemorrhage is the characteristic finding of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. On microscopic histopathological analysis, spindle cells, nuclear atypia, mitoses, and herring bone pattern are characteristic findings of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.[1] Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) gene is involved in the pathogenesis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.[2] Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor must be differentiated from neurofibroma and schwannoma.[3] The incidence of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.[4] The incidence of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor increases with age.[4] Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor affects men and women equally.[3] Common risk factors in the development of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor are pre-existing plexiform neurofibromas, pre-existing perineuriomas, radiation therapy, and neurofibromatosis type 1.[5][6][7] Symptoms of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor include peripheral edema, difficulty in moving the extremity, pain, and numbness.[8] MRI may be diagnostic of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Findings on MRI suggestive of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor include isointense on T1 weighted image and low signal on T2 weighted image.[3] The predominant therapy for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is surgical resection. Adjunctive chemotherapy and radiation therapy may be required. Common complication of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is metastasis. Prognosis is generally poor.[9]
Classification
There is no classification system established for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Pathophysiology
On gross pathology, a large firm mass with necrosis and hemorrhage is the characteristic finding of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. On microscopic histopathological analysis, spindle cells, nuclear atypia, mitoses, and herring bone pattern are characteristic findings of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.[1] Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) gene is involved in the pathogenesis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.[2]
Causes
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor may be caused by a mutation on neurofibromatosis type I gene.[10][2]
Differential Diagnosis
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor must be differentiated from neurofibroma and schwannoma.[3]
Epidemiology and Demographics
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors comprise ∼2% of all sarcomas whichare a small fraction of a group of cancers that affect 5 people per million per year. The incidence of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals worldwide. The incidence of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor increases with age. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor affects men and women equally.
Risk Factors
Common risk factors in the development of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor are pre-existing plexiform neurofibromas, pre-existing perineuriomas, radiation therapy, and neurofibromatosis type 1.[5][6][7]
Screening
According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.[11]
Complication and prognosis
In general Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is known to have high metastatic potential and poor prognosis.[1] long-term outcomes vary widely across multiple series, with 5-year survival ranging between 15% and 50%. Large tumor size at presentation (typically >5 cm) has been the most consistently determined adverse prognostic factor. Other reported factors include tumor grade, truncal location, surgical margin status, local recurrence, and heterologous rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. The true prognostic impact of NF1 syndrome in MPNST remains somewhat in flux. Several large series report significantly worse outcomes for MPNST arising in the setting of NF1 compared with sporadic disease, with inferior responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy and 5-year survivals that are up to 50% worse.
Diagnosis
Staging
There is no established system for the staging of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Symptoms
Symptoms of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor include peripheral edema, difficulty in moving the extremity, pain, and numbness.[8]
Physical Examination
Common physical examination findings of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor include edema, paresthesia, and weakness.
Laboratory Findings
There are no laboratory findings associated with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
X Ray
There are no X-ray findings associated with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
CT
CT scan may be diagnostic of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Finding on CT scan suggestive of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is a rapid growth mass with irrefular border.[3]
MRI
MRI may be diagnostic of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Findings on MRI suggestive of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor include isointense on T1 weighted image and low signal on T2 weighted image.[3]
Ultrasound
There are no ultrasound findings associated with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Other Imaging Findings
Scintigraphy may be diagnostic of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Finding on Gallium67 scintigraphy suggestive of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is higher uptake.[3]
Other Diagnostic Studies
There are no other diagnostic study findings associated with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Biopsy
Biopsy is helpful in the diagnosis of schwannoma.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
In the setting of localized disease, as is the case with all soft tissue sarcomas, complete surgical extirpation with clear margins is the treatment of choice.The predominant therapy for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is surgical resection.In the setting of advanced or metastatic MPNST, outcomes are generally poor. Doxorubicin and ifosfamide are the most active agents in unselected soft tissue sarcomas, with a Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response rate of approximately 25% for the combination. Adjunctive chemotherapy and radiation therapy may be required.Multiple retrospective datasets have shown the negative prognostic impact of involved margins and local recurrence. As in the case with most large (>5 cm) high-grade limb sarcomas, adjuvant radiation is advocated to reduce local recurrence. The risk-benefit profile of adjuvant radiation in patients with NF1 must be carefully discussed with all patients in view of the heightened risk of radiation-induced sarcomas.
Surgery
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. For patients suffering from neurofibrosarcomas in an extremity, if the tumor is vascularized and has many nerves going through it and/or around it, amputation of the extremity may be necessary. Some surgeons argue that amputation should be the procedure of choice when possible, due to the increased chance of a better quality of life. Otherwise, surgeons may opt for a limb-saving treatment, by removing less of the surrounding tissue or part of the bone, which is replaced by a metal rod or grafts.
Primary Prevention
There is no established method for prevention of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Secondary Prevention
There are no secondary preventive measures available for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Librepathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Malignant_peripheral_nerve_sheath_tumour
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Ferrari, Andrea; Gianni Bisogno; Modesto Carli (2007). “Management Of Childhood Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor”. Pediatric Drugs. 9 (4): 239–48. doi:10.2165/00148581-200709040-00005. PMID 17705563.
|access-date=requires|url=(help) - ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/malignant-peripheral-nerve-sheath-tumour
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Bates JE, Peterson CR, Dhakal S, Giampoli EJ, Constine LS (2014). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST): a SEER analysis of incidence across the age spectrum and therapeutic interventions in the pediatric population”. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 61 (11): 1955–60. doi:10.1002/pbc.25149. PMID 25130403.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Perrin RG, Guha A (2004). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors”. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 15 (2): 203–16. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2004.02.004. PMID 15177319.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Baehring JM, Betensky RA, Batchelor TT (2003). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: the clinical spectrum and outcome of treatment”. Neurology. 61 (5): 696–8. PMID 12963767.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel RL, Moes G, Kline DG (2005). “A series of 397 peripheral neural sheath tumors: 30-year experience at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center”. J Neurosurg. 102 (2): 246–55. doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0246. PMID 15739552.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Valeyrie-Allanore L, Ismaïli N, Bastuji-Garin S, Zeller J, Wechsler J, Revuz J; et al. (2005). “Symptoms associated with malignancy of peripheral nerve sheath tumours: a retrospective study of 69 patients with neurofibromatosis 1”. Br J Dermatol. 153 (1): 79–82. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06558.x. PMID 16029330.
- ↑ Neville H, Corpron C, Blakely ML, Andrassy R (2003). “Pediatric neurofibrosarcoma”. J. Pediatr. Surg. 38 (3): 343–6, discussion 343–6. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2003.50105. PMID 12632346.
- ↑ Albright, A (2008). Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery. New York: Thieme. ISBN 1588903958.
- ↑ Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) 2015. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Search?s=Malignant+peripheral+nerve+sheath+tumor
Historical Perspective
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
NF1-like cutaneous tumor syndromes appeared in the literature in 1880s, when Friedrich von Recklinghausen published seminal observations detailing cutaneous tumors comprised of both neuronal and fibroblastic tissue finally termed as neurofibromas. In 2006, Yang et al demonstrated a critical neurofibroma microenvironment interaction that includes SCF-stimulated Nf1+/− mast cells potentiating Nf1+/− fibroblast functions.
Historical Perspective
- In 18th century, NF1-like cutaneous tumor syndromes appeared in the literature. [1]
- In 1880s, Friedrich von Recklinghausen published seminal observations detailing cutaneous tumors comprised of both neuronal and fibroblastic tissue finally termed as neurofibromas.
- In 2006, Yang et al demonstrated a critical neurofibroma microenvironment interaction that includes SCF-stimulated Nf1+/− mast cells potentiating Nf1+/− fibroblast functions. [2]
References
- ↑ Morse RP (1999). “Neurofibromatosis type 1”. Arch Neurol. 56 (3): 364–5. PMID 10190829.
- ↑ http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/116/2/157?sso-checked=true
Classification
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overivew
There is no classification system established for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Classification
There is no classification system established for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
References
Pathophysiology
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
On gross pathology, a large firm mass with necrosis and hemorrhage is the characteristic finding of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. On microscopic histopathological analysis, spindle cells, nuclear atypia, mitoses, and a herring bone pattern are characteristic findings of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.[1] The neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) gene is involved in the pathogenesis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.[2]
Pathogenesis
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are a rare type of cancer that arise from the soft tissue that surrounds nerves. They are a type of sarcoma. Most malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors arise from the nerve plexuses that distribute nerves into the limbs—the brachial and lumbar plexuses—or from nerves as they arise from the trunk.[3]
Genetics
- The genotypic hallmark of NF1 involves mutations to or other loss of the 350 kilobase gene NF1 on the long arm of chromosome 17, which encodes the tumor suppressor protein neurofibromin.
- NF1 inactivation leads to ras hyperactivity and consequent activation of multiple downstream survival and proliferative pathways, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and AKT (Mouse breed AK thymoma, also termed protein kinase B, or PKB) pathways.
- Molecular pathways from neurofibroma to MPNST in NF1 syndrome remains uncertain, although NF1 deficiency in and of itself is clearly insufficient, given that only approximately 10% of all NF1 patients eventually develop MPNST.
- About half of the cases of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) occur along with NF1. The lifetime risk of having both of these conditions is at 8–13% while those with only MPNST have a 0.001% in the general population.[4]
- A recent study in a genetically engineered mouse model showed that EGFR overexpression was sufficient to transform neurofibroma into MPNST via Janus kinase 2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activation.
- Recent studies have demonstrated that there is an overall downregulation of genes in MPNST as compared with neurofibromas
- The NF1 gene locus is on chromosome 17q11.2 and the gene product is neurofibromin, acts as a tumour suppressor; inactivation of the gene thus predisposes to tumour development.Closing
</ref>missing for<ref>tag - Necrosis
- Hemorrhage
Microscopic Pathology
- Histologic features of MPNST are rather nonspecific.
- tumors are composed of monotonous spindle cells arranged in intersecting fascicles.
- Hypercellular and hypocellular areas may be present often with hypercellular areas localized in close proximity to blood vessels.
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors demonstrate a marked increase in tumor cellularity, pleomorphism, and mitotic activity and show a more organized cellular growth pattern, with less extracellular matrix material when compared with benign neurofibromas.
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors demonstrating skeletal muscle differentiation are particularly aggressive and associated with poor prognosis.
- There is no pathognomonic molecular or immunohistochemical study for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.
- S100 protein is weakly and patchily present in <50% of cases.
- The most reliable method of diagnosis remains electron microscopy, which can identify ultrastructural features of Schwann cells.
-
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Librepathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Malignant_peripheral_nerve_sheath_tumour
- ↑ Ferrari, Andrea; Gianni Bisogno; Modesto Carli (2007). “Management Of Childhood Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor”. Pediatric Drugs. 9 (4): 239–48. doi:10.2165/00148581-200709040-00005. PMID 17705563.
|access-date=requires|url=(help) - ↑ Panigrahi, S.; Mishra, S.; Das, S.; Dhir, M. (2013). “Primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor at unusual location”. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 4 (5): 83. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.116480. PMC 3808069. PMID 24174807.
- ↑ Ferrari, Andrea; Gianni Bisogno; Modesto Carli (2007). “Management Of Childhood Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor”. Pediatric Drugs. 9 (4): 239–48. doi:10.2165/00148581-200709040-00005. PMID 17705563.
|access-date=requires|url=(help)
Causes
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor may be caused by a mutation in the neurofibromatosis type I gene.[1][2]
Causes
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor may be caused by a mutation in the neurofibromatosis type I gene.[1][2]
- About half of the cases of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) occur along with NF1. The lifetime risk of having both of these conditions is at 8–13% while those with only MPNST have a 0.001% in the general population.[2]
- The NF1 gene locus is on chromosome 17q11.2 and the gene product is neurofibromin, which acts as a tumor suppressor. Inactivation of the gene predisposes to tumor development.[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Albright, A (2008). Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery. New York: Thieme. ISBN 1588903958.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Ferrari, Andrea; Gianni Bisogno; Modesto Carli (2007). “Management Of Childhood Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor”. Pediatric Drugs. 9 (4): 239–48. doi:10.2165/00148581-200709040-00005. PMID 17705563.
|access-date=requires|url=(help)
Differentiating Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor must be differentiated from neurofibroma and schwannoma.
Differential Diagnosis
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor Neurofibroma must be differentiated from:[1][2][3]
- Schwannoma
- Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP)
- Ganglioneuroma
- Dermal neurotized melanocytic nevus
- Myxoid liposarcoma
- Solitary circumscribed neuroma/palisaded encapsulated neuroma
- Traumatic neuroma
- Superficial angiomyxoma
- Nerve sheath myxoma
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST)/malignant schwannoma
- Spindle cell lipoma
- Leiomyoma
- Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor
- Fibroepithelial polyp/acrochordon (aka skin tag or soft fibroma)
References
- ↑ Neurofibroma. Libre Pathology 2015. http://librepathology.org/wiki/index.php/Neurofibroma#cite_note-pmid15486243-2 Accessed on November 17, 2015
- ↑ http://surgpathcriteria.stanford.edu/peripheral-nerve/neurofibroma/
- ↑ http://surgpathcriteria.stanford.edu/peripheral-nerve/neurofibroma/
- ↑ Rodriguez, Fausto J.; Folpe, Andrew L.; Giannini, Caterina; Perry, Arie (2012). “Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems”. Acta Neuropathologica. 123 (3): 295–319. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-0954-z. ISSN 0001-6322.
- ↑ Choi, Kwangmin; Komurov, Kakajan; Fletcher, Jonathan S.; Jousma, Edwin; Cancelas, Jose A.; Wu, Jianqiang; Ratner, Nancy (2017). “An inflammatory gene signature distinguishes neurofibroma Schwann cells and macrophages from cells in the normal peripheral nervous system”. Scientific Reports. 7 (1). doi:10.1038/srep43315. ISSN 2045-2322.
- ↑ Liao, Chung-Ping; Booker, Reid C.; Brosseau, Jean-Philippe; Chen, Zhiguo; Mo, Juan; Tchegnon, Edem; Wang, Yong; Clapp, D. Wade; Le, Lu Q. (2018). “Contributions of inflammation and tumor microenvironment to neurofibroma tumorigenesis”. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 128 (7): 2848–2861. doi:10.1172/JCI99424. ISSN 0021-9738.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Staser, K.; Yang, F.-C.; Clapp, D. W. (2010). “Mast cells and the neurofibroma microenvironment”. Blood. 116 (2): 157–164. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-242875. ISSN 0006-4971.
- ↑ Muir, David; Neubauer, Debbie; Lim, Ingrid T.; Yachnis, Anthony T.; Wallace, Margaret R. (2001). “Tumorigenic Properties of Neurofibromin-Deficient Neurofibroma Schwann Cells”. The American Journal of Pathology. 158 (2): 501–513. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63992-2. ISSN 0002-9440.
- ↑ Wilkinson, Lana M.; Manson, David; Smith, Charles R. (2004). “Best Cases from the AFIP”. RadioGraphics. 24 (suppl_1): S237–S242. doi:10.1148/rg.24si035170. ISSN 0271-5333.
- ↑ Bernthal, Nicholas; Jones, Kevin; Monument, Michael; Liu, Ting; Viskochil, David; Randall, R. (2013). “Lost in Translation: Ambiguity in Nerve Sheath Tumor Nomenclature and Its Resultant Treatment Effect”. Cancers. 5 (4): 519–528. doi:10.3390/cancers5020519. ISSN 2072-6694.
- ↑ Mautner, V. F.; Friedrich, R. E.; von Deimling, A.; Hagel, C.; Korf, B.; Knöfel, M. T.; Wenzel, R.; Fünsterer, C. (2003). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: MRI supports the diagnosis of malignant plexiform neurofibroma”. Neuroradiology. 45 (9): 618–625. doi:10.1007/s00234-003-0964-6. ISSN 0028-3940.
- ↑ Shen, M H; Harper, P S; Upadhyaya, M (1996). “Molecular genetics of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)”. Journal of Medical Genetics. 33 (1): 2–17. doi:10.1136/jmg.33.1.2. ISSN 1468-6244.
- ↑ Rubin, Joshua B.; Gutmann, David H. (2005). “Neurofibromatosis type 1 — a model for nervous system tumour formation?”. Nature Reviews Cancer. 5 (7): 557–564. doi:10.1038/nrc1653. ISSN 1474-175X.
- ↑ Gray, Mark H. (1990). “Immunohistochemical Demonstration of Factor XIIIa Expression in Neurofibromas”. Archives of Dermatology. 126 (4): 472. doi:10.1001/archderm.1990.01670280056009. ISSN 0003-987X.
- ↑ Schwannoma. Dr Tim Luijkx and Dr Sara Wein et al. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/schwannoma
- ↑ Vestibular Schwannoma. Wikipedia(2015) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestibular_schwannoma Accessed on October 2 2015
- ↑ Giordano J, Rogers LV (1989). “Peripherally administered serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists reduce inflammatory pain in rats”. European Journal of Pharmacology. 170 (1–2): 83–6. PMID 2612565.
|access-date=requires|url=(help) - ↑ Kolvenbach H, Lauven PM, Schneider B, Kunath U (1989). “Repetitive intercostal nerve block via catheter for postoperative pain relief after thoracotomy”. The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon. 37 (5): 273–6. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1020331. PMID 2588243. Retrieved 2015-11-20.
- ↑ Opaleva-Stegantseva VA, Ivanov AG, Gavrilina IA, Khar’kov EI, Ratovskaia VI (1986). “[Incidence of sudden death cases in acute coronary insufficiency and acute myocardial infarction at the pre-hospital stage in Krasnoyarsk]”. Kardiologiia (in Russian). 26 (5): 23–6. PMID 3735913.
|access-date=requires|url=(help) - ↑ Misago N, Inoue T, Narisawa Y (2007). “Unusual benign myxoid nerve sheath lesion: myxoid palisaded encapsulated neuroma (PEN) or nerve sheath myxoma with PEN/PEN-like features?”. Am J Dermatopathol. 29 (2): 160–4. doi:10.1097/01.dad.0000256688.91974.09. PMID 17414438.
- ↑ Lee EJ, Calcaterra TC, Zuckerbraun L (1998). “Traumatic neuromas of the head and neck”. Ear Nose Throat J. 77 (8): 670–4, 676. PMID 9745184.
- ↑ Hanna SA, Catapano J, Borschel GH (2016). “Painful pediatric traumatic neuroma: surgical management and clinical outcomes”. Childs Nerv Syst. 32 (7): 1191–4. doi:10.1007/s00381-016-3109-z. PMID 27179535.
- ↑ Foltán R, Klíma K, Spacková J, Sedý J (2008). “Mechanism of traumatic neuroma development”. Med Hypotheses. 71 (4): 572–6. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.05.010. PMID 18599222.
- ↑ Yao C, Zhou X, Zhao B, Sun C, Poonit K, Yan H (2017). “Treatments of traumatic neuropathic pain: a systematic review”. Oncotarget. 8 (34): 57670–57679. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16917. PMC 5593675. PMID 28915703.
- ↑ Gray MH, Smoller BR, McNutt NS, Hsu A (1990). “Neurofibromas and neurotized melanocytic nevi are immunohistochemically distinct neoplasms”. Am J Dermatopathol. 12 (3): 234–41. PMID 1693815.
- ↑ Chen Y, Klonowski PW, Lind AC, Lu D (2012). “Differentiating neurotized melanocytic nevi from neurofibromas using Melan-A (MART-1) immunohistochemical stain”. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 136 (7): 810–5. doi:10.5858/arpa.2011-0335-OA. PMID 22742554.
- ↑ Singh N, Chandrashekar L, Kar R, Sylvia MT, Thappa DM (2015). “Neurotized congenital melanocytic nevus resembling a pigmented neurofibroma”. Indian J Dermatol. 60 (1): 46–50. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.147789. PMC 4318062. PMID 25657396.
- ↑ Gray MH, Smoller BR, McNutt NS, Hsu A (1990). “Immunohistochemical demonstration of factor XIIIa expression in neurofibromas. A practical means of differentiating these tumors from neurotized melanocytic nevi and schwannomas”. Arch Dermatol. 126 (4): 472–6. PMID 1690969.
- ↑ https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/cutaneous-myxoma
- ↑ Alaiti, Samer; Nelson, Fern P.; Ryoo, Jei W. (2000). “Solitary cutaneous myxoma”. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 43 (2): 377–379. doi:10.1067/mjd.2000.101878. ISSN 0190-9622.
- ↑ Carney, J. Aidan (1986). “Cutaneous Myxomas”. Archives of Dermatology. 122 (7): 790. doi:10.1001/archderm.1986.01660190068018. ISSN 0003-987X.
- ↑ Iida, Ken; Egi, Takeshi; Shigi, Masato; Sogabe, Yusuke; Ohashi, Hirotsugu (2019). “Cutaneous Myxoma of Multiple Lesions”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open. 7 (2): e2040. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002040. ISSN 2169-7574.
- ↑ Fetsch JF, Laskin WB, Miettinen M (2005). “Nerve sheath myxoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 57 morphologically distinctive, S-100 protein- and GFAP-positive, myxoid peripheral nerve sheath tumors with a predilection for the extremities and a high local recurrence rate”. Am J Surg Pathol. 29 (12): 1615–24. PMID 16327434.
- ↑ Yadav SK, Singh S, Sarin N, Naeem R, Pruthi SK (2019). “Nerve Sheath Myxoma of Scalp: A Rare Site of Presentation”. Int J Trichology. 11 (1): 34–37. doi:10.4103/ijt.ijt_45_18. PMC 6385516. PMID 30820132.
- ↑ Bhat A, Narasimha A, C V, Vk S (2015). “Nerve sheath myxoma: report of a rare case”. J Clin Diagn Res. 9 (4): ED07–9. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/10911.5810. PMC 4437072. PMID 26023558.
- ↑ Avninder S, Ramesh V, Vermani S (2007). “Benign nerve sheath myxoma (myxoid neurothekeoma) in the leg”. Dermatol Online J. 13 (2): 14. PMID 17498433.
- ↑ Kim BW, Won CH, Chang SE, Lee MW (2014). “A case of nerve sheath myxoma on finger”. Indian J Dermatol. 59 (1): 99–101. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.123526. PMC 3884944. PMID 24470676.
- ↑ Pulitzer DR, Reed RJ (1985). “Nerve-sheath myxoma (perineurial myxoma)”. Am J Dermatopathol. 7 (5): 409–21. PMID 4091218.
- ↑ Valeyrie-Allanore, L.; Ismaili, N.; Bastuji-Garin, S.; Zeller, J.; Wechsler, J.; Revuz, J.; Wolkenstein, P. (2005). “Symptoms associated with malignancy of peripheral nerve sheath tumours: a retrospective study of 69 patients with neurofibromatosis 1”. British Journal of Dermatology. 153 (1): 79–82. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06558.x. ISSN 0007-0963.
- ↑ Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, Sharif S, Howard E, Moran A (2002). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1”. J Med Genet. 39 (5): 311–4. PMC 1735122. PMID 12011145.
- ↑ Panigrahi S, Mishra SS, Das S, Dhir MK (2013). “Primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor at unusual location”. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 4 (Suppl 1): S83–6. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.116480. PMC 3808069. PMID 24174807.
- ↑ Ferrari A, Bisogno G, Carli M (2007). “Management of childhood malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor”. Paediatr Drugs. 9 (4): 239–48. doi:10.2165/00148581-200709040-00005. PMID 17705563.
- ↑ Neville H, Corpron C, Blakely ML, Andrassy R (2003). “Pediatric neurofibrosarcoma”. J Pediatr Surg. 38 (3): 343–6, discussion 343-6. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2003.50105. PMID 12632346.
- ↑ Zehou, Ouidad; Fabre, Elizabeth; Zelek, Laurent; Sbidian, Emilie; Ortonne, Nicolas; Banu, Eugeniu; Wolkenstein, Pierre; Valeyrie-Allanore, Laurence (2013). “Chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis 1: a 10-year institutional review”. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 8 (1): 127. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-8-127. ISSN 1750-1172.
- ↑ Vasiliadis, K.; Papavasiliou, C.; Fachiridis, D.; Pervana, S.; Michaelides, M.; Kiranou, M.; Makridis, C. (2012). “Retroperitoneal extra-adrenal ganglioneuroma involving the infrahepatic inferior vena cava, celiac axis and superior mesenteric artery: A case report”. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 3 (11): 541–543. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2012.07.008. ISSN 2210-2612.
- ↑ https://radiopaedia.org/articles/ganglioneuroma
- ↑ Khin Thway, Rashpal Flora, Chirag Shah, David Olmos & Cyril Fisher (2012). “Diagnostic utility of p16, CDK4, and MDM2 as an immunohistochemical panel in distinguishing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas from other adipocytic tumors”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 36 (3): 462–469. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182417330. PMID 22301498. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ J. Rosai, M. Akerman, P. Dal Cin, I. DeWever, C. D. Fletcher, N. Mandahl, F. Mertens, F. Mitelman, A. Rydholm, R. Sciot, G. Tallini, H. Van den Berghe, W. Van de Ven, R. Vanni & H. Willen (1996). “Combined morphologic and karyotypic study of 59 atypical lipomatous tumors. Evaluation of their relationship and differential diagnosis with other adipose tissue tumors (a report of the CHAMP Study Group)”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 20 (10): 1182–1189. PMID 8827023. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Dal Cin, Paola; Kools, Patrick; Sciot, Raf; De Wever, Ivo; Van Damme, Boudewijn; Van de Ven, Wim; Van Den Berghe, Herman (1993). “Cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization investigation of ring chromosomes characterizing a specific pathologic subgroup of adipose tissue tumors”. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 68 (2): 85–90. doi:10.1016/0165-4608(93)90001-3. ISSN 0165-4608.
- ↑ Dei Tos, Angelo P.; Doglioni, Claudio; Piccinin, Sara; Sciot, Raf; Furlanetto, Alberto; Boiocchi, Mauro; Dal Cin, Paola; Maestro, Roberta; Fletcher, Christopher D. M.; Tallini, Giovanni (2000). “Coordinated expression and amplification of theMDM2,CDK4, andHMGI-C genes in atypical lipomatous tumours”. The Journal of Pathology. 190 (5): 531–536. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200004)190:5<531::AID-PATH579>3.0.CO;2-W. ISSN 0022-3417.
- ↑ Dei Tos, A (2000). “Liposarcoma: New entities and evolving concepts”. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. 4 (4): 252–266. doi:10.1053/adpa.2000.8133. ISSN 1092-9134.
- ↑ M. D. Kraus, L. Guillou & C. D. Fletcher (1997). “Well-differentiated inflammatory liposarcoma: an uncommon and easily overlooked variant of a common sarcoma”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 21 (5): 518–527. PMID 9158675. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ P. Argani, F. Facchetti, G. Inghirami & J. Rosai (1997). “Lymphocyte-rich well-differentiated liposarcoma: report of nine cases”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 21 (8): 884–895. PMID 9255251. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ H. L. Evans (1979). “Liposarcoma: a study of 55 cases with a reassessment of its classification”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 3 (6): 507–523. PMID 534388. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ A. P. Dei Tos, T. Mentzel, P. L. Newman & C. D. Fletcher (1994). “Spindle cell liposarcoma, a hitherto unrecognized variant of liposarcoma. Analysis of six cases”. The American journal of surgical pathology. 18 (9): 913–921. PMID 8067512. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ D. C. Dahlin, K. K. Unni & T. Matsuno (1977). “Malignant (fibrous) histiocytoma of bone–fact or fancy?”. Cancer. 39 (4): 1508–1516. PMID 192432. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ 57.0 57.1 Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP (1995). “Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases”. Am J Surg Pathol. 19 (8): 859–72. PMID 7611533.
- ↑ 58.0 58.1 58.2 58.3 Wenig BM, Devaney K, Bisceglia M (1995). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study of eight cases simulating a malignant spindle cell neoplasm”. Cancer. 76 (11): 2217–29. PMID 8635024.
- ↑ 59.0 59.1 Ramachandra S, Hollowood K, Bisceglia M, Fletcher CD (1995). “Inflammatory pseudotumour of soft tissues: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 18 cases”. Histopathology. 27 (4): 313–23. PMID 8847061.
- ↑ 60.0 60.1 Häusler M, Schaade L, Ramaekers VT, Doenges M, Heimann G, Sellhaus B (2003). “Inflammatory pseudotumors of the central nervous system: report of 3 cases and a literature review”. Hum Pathol. 34 (3): 253–62. doi:10.1053/hupa.2003.35. PMID 12673560.
- ↑ 61.0 61.1 61.2 61.3 Rabban JT, Zaloudek CJ, Shekitka KM, Tavassoli FA (2005). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the uterus: a clinicopathologic study of 6 cases emphasizing distinction from aggressive mesenchymal tumors”. Am J Surg Pathol. 29 (10): 1348–55. PMID 16160478.
- ↑ 62.0 62.1 Kovach SJ, Fischer AC, Katzman PJ, Salloum RM, Ettinghausen SE, Madeb R; et al. (2006). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors”. J Surg Oncol. 94 (5): 385–91. doi:10.1002/jso.20516. PMID 16967468.
- ↑ 63.0 63.1 Coffin CM, Dehner LP, Meis-Kindblom JM (1998). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, inflammatory fibrosarcoma, and related lesions: an historical review with differential diagnostic considerations”. Semin Diagn Pathol. 15 (2): 102–10. PMID 9606802.
- ↑ 64.0 64.1 Berardi RS, Lee SS, Chen HP, Stines GJ (1983). “Inflammatory pseudotumors of the lung”. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 156 (1): 89–96. PMID 6336632.
- ↑ 65.0 65.1 Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Fletcher CD (2007). “Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: comparison of clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features including ALK expression in atypical and aggressive cases”. Am J Surg Pathol. 31 (4): 509–20. doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000213393.57322.c7. PMID 17414097.
- ↑ Cukic O, Jovanovic MB (2019). “Large Fibroepithelial Polyp of the Palatine Tonsil”. Ear Nose Throat J: 145561319841203. doi:10.1177/0145561319841203. PMID 30997841.
- ↑ Vatansever M, Dinç E, Dursun Ö, Oktay ÖÖ, Arpaci R (2019). “Atypical presentation of fibroepithelial polyp: a report of two cases”. Arq Bras Oftalmol. doi:10.5935/0004-2749.20190050. PMID 30916216.
- ↑ Rexhepi M, Trajkovska E, Besimi F, Rufati N (2018). “Giant Fibroepithelial Polyp of Vulva: A Case Report and Review of Literature”. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 39 (2–3): 127–130. doi:10.2478/prilozi-2018-0051. PMID 30864355.
- ↑ Jabbour J, Chappell JR, Busby M, McCubbery NW, Brown DF, Park SJK; et al. (2019). “Glottic Obstruction from Fibroepithelial Polyp”. Am J Case Rep. 20: 219–223. doi:10.12659/AJCR.914907. PMC 6388646. PMID 30778021.
- ↑ Hong P, Cai Y, Li Z, Fan S, Yang K, Hao H; et al. (2019). “Modified Laparoscopic Partial Ureterectomy for Adult Ureteral Fibroepithelial Polyp: Technique and Initial Experience”. Urol Int. 102 (1): 13–19. doi:10.1159/000494804. PMID 30448831.
- ↑ Uçar M, Baş E, Akkoç A, Topçuoğlu M (2018). “Fibroepithelial Polyp of the Ureter: A Rare Cause of Hydronephrosis”. J Endourol Case Rep. 4 (1): 166–168. doi:10.1089/cren.2018.0031. PMC 6225073. PMID 30426076.
- ↑ Chaker K, Rhouma SB, Daly KM, Zehani A, Bibi M, Chehida MAB; et al. (2019). “Benign fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter: A case report”. Urol Case Rep. 22: 52–53. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2018.10.019. PMC 6226574. PMID 30425926.
- ↑ Hajji F, Moufid K, Ghoundale O, Touiti D (2019). “A rare case of successful endoscopic management of a fibroepithelial polyp with intussusception of the ureter and periodic prolapse into bladder”. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 101 (2): e66–e70. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2018.0198. PMC 6351868. PMID 30421620.
- ↑ Lee H, Sade I, Gilani S, Zhong M, Lombardo G (2018). “A Giant Fibroepithelial Polyp of the Small Bowel Associated with High-Grade Obstruction”. Am Surg. 84 (7): e210–e211. PMID 30401014.
- ↑ Chaker K (2019). “Benign fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter: A case report”. Urol Case Rep. 22: 15–16. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2018.09.021. PMC 6180234. PMID 30319938.
- ↑ Lozano-Peña AK, Lamadrid-Zertuche AC, Ocampo-Candiani J (2019). “Giant fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva”. Australas J Dermatol. 60 (1): 70–71. doi:10.1111/ajd.12886. PMID 30009441.
- ↑ Eckstein M, Agaimy A, Woenckhaus J, Winter A, Bittmann I, Janzen J; et al. (2019). “DICER1 mutation-positive giant botryoid fibroepithelial polyp of the urinary bladder mimicking embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma”. Hum Pathol. 84: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2018.05.015. PMID 29883781.
- ↑ Akdere H, Çevik G (2018). “Rare Fibroepithelial Polyp Extending Along the Ureter: A Case Report”. Balkan Med J. 35 (3): 275–277. doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.1537. PMC 5981127. PMID 29843497.
- ↑ Ballard DH, Rove KO, Coplen DE, Chen TY, Hulett Bowling RL (2018). “Fibroepithelial polyp causing urethral obstruction: Diagnosis by cystourethrogram”. Clin Imaging. 51: 164–167. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.009. PMC 6404776. PMID 29800931.
- ↑ Amin A, Amin Z, Al Farsi AR (2018). “Septic presentation of a giant fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva”. BMJ Case Rep. 2018. doi:10.1136/bcr-2017-222789. PMID 29574427.
- ↑ Gupta R, Smita S, Sinha R, Sinha N, Sinha L (2018). “Giant fibroepithelial polyp of the thigh and retroperitoneal fibromatosis in a young woman: a rare case”. Skeletal Radiol. 47 (9): 1299–1304. doi:10.1007/s00256-018-2904-x. PMID 29487969.
- ↑ Rajeesh Mohammed PK, Choudhury BK, Dalai RP, Rana V (2017). “Fibroepithelial Polyp with Sebaceous Hyperplasia: A Case Report”. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 38 (3): 404–406. doi:10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_124_17. PMC 5686997. PMID 29200704.
- ↑ Lee MH, Hwang JY, Lee JH, Kim DH, Song SH (2017). “Fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva accompanied by lymphangioma circumscriptum”. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 60 (4): 401–404. doi:10.5468/ogs.2017.60.4.401. PMC 5547092. PMID 28791276.
- ↑ Ten Donkelaar CS, Houwert AC, Ten Kate FJW, Lock MTWT (2017). “Polypoid arteriovenous malformation of the ureter mimicking a fibroepithelial polyp, a case report”. BMC Urol. 17 (1): 55. doi:10.1186/s12894-017-0237-z. PMC 5504856. PMID 28693464.
- ↑ Saito N, Yamasaki M, Daido W, Ishiyama S, Deguchi N, Taniwaki M (2017). “A bronchial fibroepithelial polyp with abnormal findings on auto-fluorescence imaging”. Respirol Case Rep. 5 (5): e00244. doi:10.1002/rcr2.244. PMC 5465754. PMID 28603622.
Epidemiology and Demographics
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors comprise ∼2% of all sarcomas whichare a small fraction of a group of cancers that affect 5 people per million per year. The incidence of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.[1] The incidence of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor increases with age.[1] Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor affects men and women equally.[2]
Incidence
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors comprise ∼2% of all sarcomas whichare a small fraction of a group of cancers that affect 5 people per million per year.
- The incidence of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is approximately 0.1 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.[1]
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor may arise at any age with no gender predilection.
- Half of MPNSTs are associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), the autosomal dominant condition that, affecting 1 in 3000 live births, represents the most common human cancer genetic predisposition syndrome.
Age
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor may arise at any age with no gender predilection and affects men and women equally .[1]
Gender
- Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor may arise at any age with no gender predilection and affects men and women equally.[2]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Bates JE, Peterson CR, Dhakal S, Giampoli EJ, Constine LS (2014). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST): a SEER analysis of incidence across the age spectrum and therapeutic interventions in the pediatric population”. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 61 (11): 1955–60. doi:10.1002/pbc.25149. PMID 25130403.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Radiopaedia 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/malignant-peripheral-nerve-sheath-tumour
Risk Factors
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
Common risk factors in the development of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor are pre-existing plexiform neurofibromas, pre-existing perineuriomas, radiation therapy, and neurofibromatosis type 1.[1][2][3]
Risk Factors
Common risk factors in the development of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor include:[1][2][3]
- Pre-existing plexiform neurofibromas
- Pre-existing perineuriomas
- Radiation therapy
- Neurofibromatosis type 1
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Perrin RG, Guha A (2004). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors”. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 15 (2): 203–16. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2004.02.004. PMID 15177319.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Baehring JM, Betensky RA, Batchelor TT (2003). “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: the clinical spectrum and outcome of treatment”. Neurology. 61 (5): 696–8. PMID 12963767.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel RL, Moes G, Kline DG (2005). “A series of 397 peripheral neural sheath tumors: 30-year experience at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center”. J Neurosurg. 102 (2): 246–55. doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0246. PMID 15739552.
Screening
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Screening
According to the the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.[1]
References
- ↑ malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) 2015. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Search?s=malignant+peripheral+nerve+sheath+tumor
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
In general Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is known to have high metastatic potential and poor prognosis.[1] long-term outcomes vary widely across multiple series, with 5-year survival ranging between 15% and 50%. Large tumor size at presentation (typically >5 cm) has been the most consistently determined adverse prognostic factor. Other reported factors include tumor grade, truncal location, surgical margin status, local recurrence, and heterologous rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. The true prognostic impact of NF1 syndrome in MPNST remains somewhat in flux. Several large series report significantly worse outcomes for MPNST arising in the setting of NF1 compared with sporadic disease, with inferior responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy and 5-year survivals that are up to 50% worse.
Complications
- A common complication of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is metastasis.
- Metastasis occurs in about 39% of patients, most commonly to the lung.[2]
Prognosis
- In general Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is known to have high metastatic potential and poor prognosis.[1]
- long-term outcomes vary widely across multiple series, with 5-year survival ranging between 15% and 50%.
- Large tumor size at presentation (typically >5 cm) has been the most consistently determined adverse prognostic factor.
- Other reported factors include tumor grade, truncal location, surgical margin status, local recurrence, and heterologous rhabdomyoblastic differentiation.
- The true prognostic impact of NF1 syndrome in MPNST remains somewhat in flux.
- Several large series report significantly worse outcomes for MPNST arising in the setting of NF1 compared with sporadic disease, with inferior responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy and 5-year survivals that are up to 50% worse.
References
- ↑ Neville H, Corpron C, Blakely ML, Andrassy R (2003). “Pediatric neurofibrosarcoma”. J. Pediatr. Surg. 38 (3): 343–6, discussion 343–6. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2003.50105. PMID 12632346.
- ↑ Panigrahi S, Mishra SS, Das S, Dhir MK (2013). “Primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor at unusual location”. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 4 (Suppl 1): S83–6. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.116480. PMC 3808069. PMID 24174807.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Staging | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | X-Ray | CT | MRI | Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies | Biopsy
Treatment
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therappies
Looking for the patient version?
© 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH

![Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor[1]](https://www.wikidoc.org/images/f/fa/Malignant_peripheral_nerve_sheath_tumour.jpg)