Health Dictionary Find a Doctor

Secondary amyloidosis

For patient information, click here
To go back to the Amyloidosis landing page, click here.

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2]

Synonyms and keywords:Reactive amyloidosis, AA amyloidosis

Overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2]

Overview

Secondary amyloidosis, also known as reactive amyloidosis is the condition of amyloid deposition particularly in the kidneys secondary to an underlying disorder, most commonly a chronic inflammatory disorder. In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis. There is no significant data regarding the historical perspective of amyloidosis throughout the 18th century. Rudolph Virchow and Weber are the prominent figures with substantial work on amyloidosis during the 19th century. In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis. AA amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein derived from the spontaneous aggregation of fibrils composed of misfolded proteins, called amyloid precursors. In secondary amyloidosis, the amyloid precursor is SAA, an acute phase reactant, encoded by SAA 1&2 genes. In secondary amyloidosis, intermediate products of SAA metabolism tend to aggregate and form protofilaments that accumulate within extracellular space and form the insoluble amyloid deposits. Secondary amyloidosis is associated with chronic inflammation (such as tuberculosis or rheumatoid arthritis). Causes of secondary amyloidosis can include any persistent inflammatory process such as rheumatologic, autoinflammatory, chronic infectious, and other disorders. Echocardiography is critical in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Secondary amyloidosis needs to be differentiated from other conditions causing nephrotic syndrome, hepatosplenomegaly, and peripheral neuropathy. The incidence of AA amyloidosis is approximately 0.16 per 100,000 individuals in 2008 in the united kingdom. The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries. Secondary amyloidosis more commonly affects children. Men are more commonly affected by amyloidosis than women. In amyloidosis, insoluble fibrils of amyloid are deposited in organs, causing organ dysfunction and eventually death. Patients with amyloidosis may eventually suffer from heart failure, nephrotic syndrome, hepatomegaly and peripheral neuropathy. Prognosis is poor and 5-years survival rate is 51.3%.Infection and renal failure are the most common cause of death. The diagnostic study of choice in amyloidosis is tissue biopsy of the affected organ. Urinary protein measurement followed by renal biopsy is the gold standard of the diagnosis. Common physical examination findings of secondary amyloidosis include periorbital edema, pitting edema of the lower extremity, and signs of the underlying inflammatory disorder. An elevated urinary protein is suggestive of secondary amyloidosis. Elevated level of acute phase reactant, abnormal liver function test, and other findings may also be observed. An ECG may be helpful in the diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis. Possible ECG findings associated with the diagnosis of cardiac involvement include low voltage QRS complexes, Left ventricular hypertrophy, Right ventricular hypertrophy, and atrioventricular block. An x-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis. Findings suggestive of amyloid deposition may include nodular densities. CT scan can be done to assess for amyloid deposition in particular organs. It can also be done to rule out other causes of organ dysfunction. However, MRI is more sensitive than CT in the diagnosis of amyloidosis. MRI is commonly done to assess for amyloid deposition in particular organs. It can also be done to rule out other causes of organ dysfunction. A cardiac MRI is used when an echocardiogram fails to differentiate amyloidosis from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Echocardiogram should be done at diagnosis and routinely thereafter to monitor response to therapy. Total body SAP component scintigraphy may be used in the workup and follow-up of patients with amyloid deposition. This method has been observed to have high sensitivity (90%) and requires a low radioactive dose which makes it a safe and effective method. The radiolabeled SAP binds to aa amyloid and localizes its deposition semiquantitatively. Medical or surgical treatment of the underlying chronic infection or inflammatory disease is recommended among all patients who develop AA amyloidosis.

Historical Perspective

In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis. There is no significant data regarding the historical perspective of amyloidosis throughout the 18th century. Rudolph Virchow and Weber are the prominent figures with substantial work on amyloidosis during the 19th century. In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis.

Classification

Amyloidosis can also be classified based on the extent of organ system involvement

Pathophysiology

AA amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein derived from the spontaneous aggregation of fibrils composed of misfolded proteins, called amyloid precursors. In secondary amyloidosis, the amyloid precursor is SAA, an acute phase reactant, encoded by SAA 1&2 genes. In secondary amyloidosis, intermediate products of SAA metabolism tend to aggregate and form protofilaments that accumulate within extracellular space and form the insoluble amyloid deposits. Secondary amyloidosis is associated with chronic inflammation (such as tuberculosis or rheumatoid arthritis).

Causes

Causes of secondary amyloidosis can include any persistent inflammatory process such as rheumatologic, autoinflammatory, chronic infectious, and other disorders.

Differentiating Amyloidosis from other Diseases

Secondary amyloidosis needs to be differentiated from other conditions causing nephrotic syndrome, hepatosplenomegaly, and peripheral neuropathy.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The incidence of AA amyloidosis is approximately 0.16 per 100,000 individuals in 2008 in the united kingdom. The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries. Secondary amyloidosis more commonly affects children. Men are more commonly affected by amyloidosis than women.

Risk Factors

The most potent risk factor in the development of secondary amyloidosis is a persistent inflammatory disorders. Chronic infections and inflammatory arthritis are among the most common risk factors.

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for amyloidosis.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

In amyloidosis, insoluble fibrils of amyloid are deposited in organs, causing organ dysfunction and eventually death. Patients with amyloidosis may eventually suffer from heart failure, nephrotic syndrome, hepatomegaly and peripheral neuropathy. Prognosis is poor and 5-years survival rate is 51.3%.Infection and renal failure are the most common cause of death.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

The diagnostic study of choice in amyloidosis is tissue biopsy of the affected organ. Urinary protein measurement followed by renal biopsy is the gold standard of the diagnosis.

History and Symptoms

Symptoms of secondary amyloidosis may vary depending on the primary disorder and the affected organs. Secondary amyloidosis most commonly presents with kidney involvement and patients usually have a positive history of periorbital edema and frothy urine.

Physical Examination

Common physical examination findings of secondary amyloidosis include periorbital edema, pitting edema of the lower extremity, and signs of the underlying inflammatory disorder.

Laboratory Findings

An elevated urinary protein is suggestive of secondary amyloidosis. Elevated level of acute phase reactant, abnormal liver function test, and other findings may also be observed.

Electrocardiogram

An ECG may be helpful in the diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis. Possible ECG findings associated with the diagnosis of cardiac involvement include low voltage QRS complexes, Left ventricular hypertrophy, Right ventricular hypertrophy, and atrioventricular block.

X-Ray

An x-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis. Findings suggestive of amyloid deposition may include nodular densities.

CT Scan

CT scan can be done to assess for amyloid deposition in particular organs. It can also be done to rule out other causes of organ dysfunction. However, MRI is more sensitive than CT in the diagnosis of amyloidosis.

MRI

MRI is commonly done to assess for amyloid deposition in particular organs. It can also be done to rule out other causes of organ dysfunction. A cardiac MRI is used when an echocardiogram fails to differentiate amyloidosis from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Echocardiography

Echocardiography is critical in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Echocardiogram should be done at diagnosis and routinely thereafter to monitor response to therapy.

Other Imaging Findings

Total body SAP component scintigraphy may be used in the workup and follow-up of patients with amyloid deposition. This method has been observed to have high sensitivity (90%) and requires a low radioactive dose which makes it a safe and effective method. The radiolabeled SAP binds to aa amyloid and localizes its deposition semiquantitatively.

Other Diagnostic Studies

A tissue biopsy or fat aspirate should be done to confirm the presence or type of amyloid protein which is involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Medical or surgical treatment of the underlying chronic infection or inflammatory disease is recommended among all patients who develop AA amyloidosis.

Surgery

Organ-specific transplant may need to be done, depending on the organ involved. However, surgery is not commonly done in patients with amyloidosis, since it is usually a systemic disease that requires treatment of the underlying cause.

Prevention

Primary Prevention

There is no role for primary prevention in amyloidosis.

Secondary Prevention

There is no role for secondary prevention in amyloidosis.

References

Historical Perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shaghayegh Habibi, M.D.[2]

Overview

In 1639, Nicolaus Fontanus autopsied a young man who had ascites, jaundice, liver abscess, and splenomegaly and his report has been the first description of amyloidosis. There is no significant data regarding the historical perspective of amyloidosis throughout the 18th century. Rudolph Virchow and Weber are the prominent figures with substantial work on amyloidosis during the 19th century. In 1922, Bennhold introduced Congo Red staining of amyloid that remains the gold standard for diagnosis.

Historical Perspective

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Kyle RA (June 2011). “Amyloidosis: a brief history”. Amyloid. 18 Suppl 1: 6–7. doi:10.3109/13506129.2011.574354001. PMID 21838413.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Sipe JD, Cohen AS (June 2000). “Review: history of the amyloid fibril”. J. Struct. Biol. 130 (2–3): 88–98. doi:10.1006/jsbi.2000.4221. PMID 10940217.
  3. Khan MF, Falk RH (November 2001). “Amyloidosis”. Postgrad Med J. 77 (913): 686–93. PMC 1742163. PMID 11677276.

Template:WH Template:WS

Classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

There is no established system for the classification of secondary amyloidosis.

Classification

There is no established system for the classification of secondary amyloidosis.

References

Pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Shaghayegh Habibi, M.D.[3] Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[4]

Overview

AA amyloid is an abnormal insoluble extracellular protein derived from the spontaneous aggregation of fibrils composed of misfolded proteins, called amyloid precursors. In secondary amyloidosis, the amyloid precursor is SAA, an acute phase reactant, encoded by SAA 1&2 genes. In secondary amyloidosis, intermediate products of SAA metabolism tend to aggregate and form protofilaments that accumulate within extracellular space and form the insoluble amyloid deposits. Secondary amyloidosis is associated with chronic inflammation (such as tuberculosis or rheumatoid arthritis).

Pathophysiology


 
 
 
 
Infection/Inflammation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Increased production of IL-1/IL-6/TNF-α
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Upregulation of hepatic serum amyloid A production
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SAA production uptake by macrophages
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
C-terminal cleavage of SAA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
β-sheet configuration of SAA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fibril deposition in extracellular space
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Binding of glycosaminoglycan, serum amyloid P, and lipid components
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Resistant to proteolysis
 
 
 
 
The above algorithm is adopted from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease[4]

Associated Conditions

Associated Conditions
Conditions Examples
Chronic infections
Monogenic periodic fever syndromes
Conditions predisposing to recurrent infections
Neoplasia
Inflammatory Arthritis
Systemic Vasculitis
Others

Gross Pathology

On gross pathology, the organs affected by amyloidosis can be characterized by the following features:

  • Porcelain like or waxy appearance
  • Enlargement

Images

Nodular deposits of amyloid on the pleural surfaces.[8]
Cut section of an inguinal lymph node showing firm and waxy consistency.[9]
A slice of the affected node (left) has turned black after treatment with Lugol’s solution. A piece of normal myometrium (right) treated similarly with no reaction is also shown.[10]


Microscopic Pathology

On microscopic histopathological analysis, aa amyloidosis is characterized by:[11][12]

  • Green birefringence under polarized light after Congo red staining (appears red under normal light)
  • Linear non-branching fibrils (indefinite length with an approximately same diameter)
  • Distinct X-ray diffraction pattern consistent with Pauling’s model of a cross-beta fibril

On electron microscopy, amyloid fibrils have the following characteristics:[13]

  • 10 to 15 nm diameter
  • Straight, rigid, and nonbranching
  • Composed of twisted protofilaments

Images

Small bowel duodenum with amyloid deposition Congo red.[14]
Amyloidosis (black arrows) in a lymph node after staining with Congo Red.[15]
Green birefringence under polarized light.[16]


References

  1. Jayaraman, Shobini; Gantz, Donald L.; Haupt, Christian; Gursky, Olga (2017). “Serum amyloid A forms stable oligomers that disrupt vesicles at lysosomal pH and contribute to the pathogenesis of reactive amyloidosis”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114 (32): E6507–E6515. doi:10.1073/pnas.1707120114. ISSN 0027-8424.
  2. Kisilevsky, Robert; Raimondi, Sara; Bellotti, Vittorio (2016). “Historical and Current Concepts of Fibrillogenesis and In vivo Amyloidogenesis: Implications of Amyloid Tissue Targeting”. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 3. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2016.00017. ISSN 2296-889X.
  3. Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN (June 2016). “Systemic amyloidosis”. Lancet. 387 (10038): 2641–2654. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01274-X. PMID 26719234.
  4. Rumjon A, Coats T, Javaid MM (2012). “Review of eprodisate for the treatment of renal disease in AA amyloidosis”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 5: 37–43. doi:10.2147/IJNRD.S19165. PMC 3304340. PMID 22427728.
  5. Blank, Norbert; Hegenbart, Ute; Dietrich, Sascha; Brune, Maik; Beimler, Jörg; Röcken, Christoph; Müller-Tidow, Carsten; Lorenz, Hanns-Martin; Schönland, Stefan O. (2018). “Obesity is a significant susceptibility factor for idiopathic AA amyloidosis”. Amyloid. 25 (1): 37–45. doi:10.1080/13506129.2018.1429391. ISSN 1350-6129.
  6. van der Hilst, J. C. H.; Yamada, T.; Op den Camp, H. J. M.; van der Meer, J. W. M.; Drenth, J. P. H.; Simon, A. (2008). “Increased susceptibility of serum amyloid A 1.1 to degradation by MMP-1: potential explanation for higher risk of type AA amyloidosis”. Rheumatology. 47 (11): 1651–1654. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken371. ISSN 1462-0324.
  7. Papa, Riccardo; Doglio, Matteo; Lachmann, Helen J.; Ozen, Seza; Frenkel, Joost; Simon, Anna; Neven, Bénédicte; Kuemmerle-Deschner, Jasmin; Ozgodan, Huri; Caorsi, Roberta; Federici, Silvia; Finetti, Martina; Trachana, Maria; Brunner, Jurgen; Bezrodnik, Liliana; Pinedo Gago, Mari Carmen; Maggio, Maria Cristina; Tsitsami, Elena; Al Suwairi, Wafaa; Espada, Graciela; Shcherbina, Anna; Aksu, Guzide; Ruperto, Nicolino; Martini, Alberto; Ceccherini, Isabella; Gattorno, Marco (2017). “A web-based collection of genotype-phenotype associations in hereditary recurrent fevers from the Eurofever registry”. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 12 (1). doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0720-3. ISSN 1750-1172.
  8. By Yale Rosen from USA – Amyloidosis, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=31127928
  9. By Ed Uthman, MD – https://www.flickr.com/photos/euthman/377537238/, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1629764
  10. By Ed Uthman, MD – https://www.flickr.com/photos/euthman/377538012/, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1629740
  11. Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named pmid116772762
  12. Röcken C, Shakespeare A (February 2002). “Pathology, diagnosis and pathogenesis of AA amyloidosis”. Virchows Arch. 440 (2): 111–122. doi:10.1007/s00428-001-0582-9. PMID 11964039.
  13. Close, William; Neumann, Matthias; Schmidt, Andreas; Hora, Manuel; Annamalai, Karthikeyan; Schmidt, Matthias; Reif, Bernd; Schmidt, Volker; Grigorieff, Nikolaus; Fändrich, Marcus (2018). “Physical basis of amyloid fibril polymorphism”. Nature Communications. 9 (1). doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03164-5. ISSN 2041-1723.
  14. By Michael Feldman, MD, PhDUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine – http://www.healcentral.org/healapp/showMetadata?metadataId=38717, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=870218
  15. By Ed Uthman, MD – https://www.flickr.com/photos/euthman/377559787/, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1629716
  16. By Ed Uthman, MD – https://www.flickr.com/photos/euthman/377559955/, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1629705

Template:WH Template:WS

Causes

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shaghayegh Habibi, M.D.[2]

Overview

Causes of secondary amyloidosis can include any persistent inflammatory process such as rheumatologic, autoinflammatory, chronic infectious, and other disorders.

Causes

  • Most common causes of secondary amyloidosis include:[1]
  • Less common causes of acquired amyloidosis include:[2][3][4]

References

  1. Shin YM (March 2011). “Hepatic amyloidosis”. Korean J Hepatol. 17 (1): 80–3. doi:10.3350/kjhep.2011.17.1.80. PMC 3304630. PMID 21494083.
  2. Meira T, Sousa R, Cordeiro A, Ilgenfritz R, Borralho P (2015). “Intestinal Amyloidosis in Common Variable Immunodeficiency and Rheumatoid Arthritis”. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2015: 405695. doi:10.1155/2015/405695. PMC 4553190. PMID 26351592.
  3. Kadiroğlu AK, Yıldırım Y, Yılmaz Z, Kayabaşı H, Avcı Y, Yıldırım MS, Yılmaz ME (2012). “A rare cause of secondary amyloidosis: common variable immunodeficiency disease”. Case Rep Nephrol. 2012: 860208. doi:10.1155/2012/860208. PMC 3914192. PMID 24558615.
  4. Lim AY, Lee JH, Jung KS, Gwag HB, Kim DH, Kim SJ, Lee GY, Kim JS, Kim HJ, Lee SY, Lee JE, Jeon ES, Kim K (July 2015). “Clinical features and outcomes of systemic amyloidosis with gastrointestinal involvement: a single-center experience”. Korean J. Intern. Med. 30 (4): 496–505. doi:10.3904/kjim.2015.30.4.496. PMC 4497337. PMID 26161016.

Template:WH Template:WS

Differentiating Secondary amyloidosis from other Diseases

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2] Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[3]

Overview

Secondary amyloidosis needs to be differentiated from other conditions causing nephrotic syndrome, hepatosplenomegaly, and peripheral neuropathy.

Differentiating Amyloidosis from other Diseases

Amyloisosis subtype Protein Organ involvement (%)
Kidney Liver Heart
Primary Monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains 50-100 10-25 50-100
Secondary Serum amyloid A 50-100 <10 _
Hereditary Transthyretin (mutated) <10 _ 25-50
DRA (dialysis related amyloidosis) Beta‐2 microglobulin _ _ _
Senile systemic (cardiac) amyloidosis Transthyretin (wild type) _ _ 50-100
Meretoja syndrome Gelsolin _ _ _
  • Tables below provide information on the differential diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis.
Differential diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis
Nephrotic syndrome causes[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
            Hepatosplenomegaly causes[10][11]
            • Metabolic disorders
              • Chronic liver disease and portal hypertension
              • Infectoins
              • Hematologic disorders
              • Rare disorders
              Peripheral neuropathy causes[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]
              • Neurologic disorders
              • Inflammatory disorders
              • Toxins
              • Vitamin deficiencies
              • Metabolic disorders
              • Genetic disorders
              Organ System Involvement Differential Diagnosis Causes Clinical Features Laboratory Findings Gold Standard Test Therapy
              Nephrotic Syndrome and Renal Failure[3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Secondary (AA) Amyloidosis
              • Biopsy and congo-red staining of the sample
              • Treatment of the undelying inflammatory disorder
              Primary (AL) Amyloidosis


              Diabetic Nephropathy
              Minimal Change Disease
              Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis
              • Biopsy:
                • Podocyte foot process effacement
                • Capillary lumen abolished by the segmental increase in matrix
              Fabry’s Disease
              • Deficient alpha galactosidase A
              Light Chain Deposition Disease
              • Biopsy:
                • Non-amyloid granules
              Membranous Glomerulonephritis
              Fibrillary-Immunotactoid Glomerulopathy
              • Biopsy:
                • Polycloncal IgG deposits
                • Infiltration of glomerular structures by amorphous acellular material (nonbranching fibrils 12-24nm in diameter)
                • Ig heavy-chain and one light-chain subclass
              Organ System Involvement Differential Diagnosis Causes Clinical Features Laboratory Findings Gold Standard Test Therapy
              Polyneuropathy[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] POEMS syndrome (Demyelinating)
              Metabolic Syndrome (Axonal pathology)
              Vitamin Deficiencies (Axonal Pathology)



              Guillain-Barre Syndrome (Demyelinating)
              • Delayed F waves
              • Clinical diagnostic criteria (progressive weakness of more than two limbs, areflexia, and progression for no more than four weeks)
              Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) (Mixed axonal and demyelinatiing)


              • EFNS/PNS criteria
              • Koski criteria
              Multifocal Motor Neuropathy
              • Progressive, asymmetric, distal and upper limb predominant weakness
              • No significant sensory abnormalities
              • Areflexia
              • Clinical criteria (EFNS/PNS):
                • Slowly progressive or step-wise progressive, focal, asymmetric limb weakness; i.e., motor involvement in the motor nerve distribution of at least two nerves for > 1 month.
                • No objective sensory abnormalities except for minor vibration sense abnormalities in the lower limbs


              Organ System Involvement Differential Diagnosis Causes Features Laboratory Findings Gold Standard Test Therapy
              Organomegaly (Hepatosplenomegaly and Lymphadenopathy)[23][24] Malaria[25]
              Kala-azar[26]


              Infective Hepatitis
              Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML)[27][28]
              Lymphoma
              Primary (AL) Amyloidosis
              • Typical green birefringence under polarized light after Congo red staining (appears in red under normal light)
              • Congo red staining
              • Melphalan-prednisone/dexamethasone
              • Dexamethasone plus Cyclophosphamide-thalidomide
              • Stem cell transplantation
              Gaucher’s Disease

              References

              1. Real de Asua, Diego; Galvan, Jose Maria; Filigghedu, Maria Teresa; Trujillo, Davinia; Costa, Ramon; Cadinanos, Julen (2014). “Systemic AA amyloidosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management”. Clinical Epidemiology: 369. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S39981. ISSN 1179-1349.
              2. Mollee, P.; Renaut, P.; Gottlieb, D.; Goodman, H. (2014). “How to diagnose amyloidosis”. Internal Medicine Journal. 44 (1): 7–17. doi:10.1111/imj.12288. ISSN 1444-0903.
              3. 3.0 3.1 Rivera F, López-Gómez JM, Pérez-García R (September 2004). “Clinicopathologic correlations of renal pathology in Spain”. Kidney Int. 66 (3): 898–904. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00833.x. PMID 15327378.
              4. 4.0 4.1 Haas M, Meehan SM, Karrison TG, Spargo BH (November 1997). “Changing etiologies of unexplained adult nephrotic syndrome: a comparison of renal biopsy findings from 1976-1979 and 1995-1997”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 30 (5): 621–31. PMID 9370176.
              5. 5.0 5.1 Simon P, Ramee MP, Boulahrouz R, Stanescu C, Charasse C, Ang KS, Leonetti F, Cam G, Laruelle E, Autuly V, Rioux N (September 2004). “Epidemiologic data of primary glomerular diseases in western France”. Kidney Int. 66 (3): 905–8. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00834.x. PMID 15327379.
              6. 6.0 6.1 Braden GL, Mulhern JG, O’Shea MH, Nash SV, Ucci AA, Germain MJ (May 2000). “Changing incidence of glomerular diseases in adults”. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 35 (5): 878–83. PMID 10793022.
              7. 7.0 7.1 Malafronte P, Mastroianni-Kirsztajn G, Betônico GN, Romão JE, Alves MA, Carvalho MF, Viera Neto OM, Cadaval RA, Bérgamo RR, Woronik V, Sens YA, Marrocos MS, Barros RT (November 2006). “Paulista Registry of glomerulonephritis: 5-year data report”. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 21 (11): 3098–105. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl237. PMID 16968733.
              8. 8.0 8.1 Bahiense-Oliveira M, Saldanha LB, Mota EL, Penna DO, Barros RT, Romão-Junior JE (February 2004). “Primary glomerular diseases in Brazil (1979-1999): is the frequency of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis increasing?”. Clin. Nephrol. 61 (2): 90–7. PMID 14989627.
              9. 9.0 9.1 Gesualdo L, Di Palma AM, Morrone LF, Strippoli GF, Schena FP (September 2004). “The Italian experience of the national registry of renal biopsies”. Kidney Int. 66 (3): 890–4. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00831.x. PMID 15327376.
              10. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:77 ISBN 1591032016
              11. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:68 ISBN 140510368X
              12. 12.0 12.1 Marchettini P, Lacerenza M, Mauri E, Marangoni C (2006). “Painful peripheral neuropathies”. Curr Neuropharmacol. 4 (3): 175–81. PMC 2430688. PMID 18615140.
              13. 13.0 13.1 Watson JC, Dyck PJ (2015). “Peripheral Neuropathy: A Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Symptom Management”. Mayo Clin Proc. 90 (7): 940–51. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.05.004. PMID 26141332.
              14. 14.0 14.1 Hughes RA (2002). “Peripheral neuropathy”. BMJ. 324 (7335): 466–9. PMC 1122393. PMID 11859051.
              15. 15.0 15.1 Colloca L, Ludman T, Bouhassira D, Baron R, Dickenson AH, Yarnitsky D; et al. (2017). “Neuropathic pain”. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 3: 17002. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.2. PMC 5371025. PMID 28205574.
              16. 16.0 16.1 Juster-Switlyk K, Smith AG (2016). “Updates in diabetic peripheral neuropathy”. F1000Res. 5. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7898.1. PMC 4847561. PMID 27158461.
              17. 17.0 17.1 Bansal V, Kalita J, Misra UK (2006). “Diabetic neuropathy”. Postgrad Med J. 82 (964): 95–100. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.036137. PMC 2596705. PMID 16461471.
              18. 18.0 18.1 Hanewinckel R, Ikram MA, Van Doorn PA (2016). “Peripheral neuropathies”. Handb Clin Neurol. 138: 263–82. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-802973-2.00015-X. PMID 27637963.
              19. 19.0 19.1 Argov Z, Mastaglia FL (1979). “Drug-induced peripheral neuropathies”. Br Med J. 1 (6164): 663–6. PMC 1598252. PMID 219931.
              20. 20.0 20.1 Remiche G, Kadhim H, Maris C, Mavroudakis N (2013). “[Peripheral neuropathies, from diagnosis to treatment, review of the literature and lessons from the local experience]”. Rev Med Brux. 34 (4): 211–20. PMID 24195230.
              21. 21.0 21.1 Phan T, McLeod JG, Pollard JD, Peiris O, Rohan A, Halpern JP (1995). “Peripheral neuropathy associated with simvastatin”. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 58 (5): 625–8. PMC 1073498. PMID 7745415.
              22. 22.0 22.1 Cohen JA, Gross KF (1990). “Peripheral neuropathy: causes and management in the elderly”. Geriatrics. 45 (2): 21–6, 31–4. PMID 2153610.
              23. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:77 ISBN 1591032016
              24. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:68 ISBN 140510368X
              25. Malaria life cycle & pathogenesis. Malaria in Armenia. Accessed October 31, 2006.
              26. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In a page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:157
              27. Savage DG, Szydlo RM, Goldman JM (January 1997). “Clinical features at diagnosis in 430 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia seen at a referral centre over a 16-year period”. Br. J. Haematol. 96 (1): 111–6. PMID 9012696.
              28. Thompson PA, Kantarjian HM, Cortes JE (October 2015). “Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2015”. Mayo Clin. Proc. 90 (10): 1440–54. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.010. PMC 5656269. PMID 26434969.
              Epidemiology and Demographics

              Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shaghayegh Habibi, M.D.[2] Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[3]

              Overview

              The incidence of AA amyloidosis is approximately 0.16 per 100,000 individuals in 2008 in the United kingdom. The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries. Secondary amyloidosis more commonly affects children. Men are more commonly affected by amyloidosis than women.

              Epidemiology and Demographics

              Incidence

              • The incidence of AA amyloidosis is approximately 0.16 per 100,000 individuals in 2008 in the United kingdom.[1]

              Prevalence

              • The prevalence of AA amyloidosis is 5,000 to 10,000 per 100,000 individuals with chronic inflammatory process per year worldwide.[2]

              Mortality rate

              • The mortality rate of systemic amyloidosis is approximately 100 per 100,000 deaths in developed countries.[3]

              Age

              • Secondary amyloidosis more commonly affects children.[4]

              Race

              • There is no racial predilection to secondary amyloidosis.

              Gender

              • Men are more commonly affected by amyloidosis than women.[5]

              References

              1. Lane T, Pinney JH, Gilbertson JA, Hutt DF, Rowczenio DM, Mahmood S, Sachchithanantham S, Fontana M, Youngstein T, Quarta CC, Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN, Lachmann HJ (September 2017). “Changing epidemiology of AA amyloidosis: clinical observations over 25 years at a single national referral centre”. Amyloid. 24 (3): 162–166. doi:10.1080/13506129.2017.1342235. PMID 28686088.
              2. Koivuniemi, Riitta; Paimela, Leena; Suomalainen, Risto; Törnroth, Tom; Leirisalo-Repo, Marjatta (2009). “Amyloidosis is frequently undetected in patients with rheumatoid arthritis”. Amyloid. 15 (4): 262–268. doi:10.1080/13506120802524676. ISSN 1350-6129.
              3. Pepys MB (2006). “Amyloidosis”. Annu. Rev. Med. 57: 223–41. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131243. PMID 16409147.
              4. Bilginer, Yelda; Akpolat, Tekin; Ozen, Seza (2011). “Renal amyloidosis in children”. Pediatric Nephrology. 26 (8): 1215–1227. doi:10.1007/s00467-011-1797-x. ISSN 0931-041X.
              5. Shin YM (March 2011). “Hepatic amyloidosis”. Korean J Hepatol. 17 (1): 80–3. doi:10.3350/kjhep.2011.17.1.80. PMC 3304630. PMID 21494083.

              Template:WH Template:WS

              Risk Factors

              Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2]

              Overview

              The most potent risk factor in the development of secondary amyloidosis is a persistent inflammatory disorders. Chronic infections and inflammatory arthritis are among the most common risk factors.

              Risk Factors

              References

              1. Koivuniemi, Riitta; Paimela, Leena; Suomalainen, Risto; Törnroth, Tom; Leirisalo-Repo, Marjatta (2009). “Amyloidosis is frequently undetected in patients with rheumatoid arthritis”. Amyloid. 15 (4): 262–268. doi:10.1080/13506120802524676. ISSN 1350-6129.
              2. Blank, Norbert; Hegenbart, Ute; Dietrich, Sascha; Brune, Maik; Beimler, Jörg; Röcken, Christoph; Müller-Tidow, Carsten; Lorenz, Hanns-Martin; Schönland, Stefan O. (2018). “Obesity is a significant susceptibility factor for idiopathic AA amyloidosis”. Amyloid. 25 (1): 37–45. doi:10.1080/13506129.2018.1429391. ISSN 1350-6129.
              3. van der Hilst, J. C. H.; Yamada, T.; Op den Camp, H. J. M.; van der Meer, J. W. M.; Drenth, J. P. H.; Simon, A. (2008). “Increased susceptibility of serum amyloid A 1.1 to degradation by MMP-1: potential explanation for higher risk of type AA amyloidosis”. Rheumatology. 47 (11): 1651–1654. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken371. ISSN 1462-0324.
              4. Papa, Riccardo; Doglio, Matteo; Lachmann, Helen J.; Ozen, Seza; Frenkel, Joost; Simon, Anna; Neven, Bénédicte; Kuemmerle-Deschner, Jasmin; Ozgodan, Huri; Caorsi, Roberta; Federici, Silvia; Finetti, Martina; Trachana, Maria; Brunner, Jurgen; Bezrodnik, Liliana; Pinedo Gago, Mari Carmen; Maggio, Maria Cristina; Tsitsami, Elena; Al Suwairi, Wafaa; Espada, Graciela; Shcherbina, Anna; Aksu, Guzide; Ruperto, Nicolino; Martini, Alberto; Ceccherini, Isabella; Gattorno, Marco (2017). “A web-based collection of genotype-phenotype associations in hereditary recurrent fevers from the Eurofever registry”. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 12 (1). doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0720-3. ISSN 1750-1172.
              Screening

              Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shaghayegh Habibi, M.D.[2]

              Overview

              There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for amyloidosis.

              Screening

              There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for amyloidosis.

              References

              Template:WS Template:WH

              Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

              Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shaghayegh Habibi, M.D.[2] Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[3]

              Overview

              In amyloidosis, insoluble fibrils of amyloid are deposited in organs, causing organ dysfunction and eventually death. Patients with amyloidosis may eventually suffer from heart failure, nephrotic syndrome, hepatomegaly and peripheral neuropathy. Prognosis is poor and 5-years survival rate is 51.3%.Infection and renal failure are the most common cause of death.

              Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

              Natural History

              Complications

              Prognosis

              References

              1. 1.0 1.1 Lachmann, Helen J.; Goodman, Hugh J.B.; Gilbertson, Janet A.; Gallimore, J. Ruth; Sabin, Caroline A.; Gillmore, Julian D.; Hawkins, Philip N. (2007). “Natural History and Outcome in Systemic AA Amyloidosis”. New England Journal of Medicine. 356 (23): 2361–2371. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070265. ISSN 0028-4793.
              2. Jerzykowska S, Cymerys M, Gil LA, Balcerzak A, Pupek-Musialik D, Komarnicki MA (2014). “Primary systemic amyloidosis as a real diagnostic challenge – case study”. Cent Eur J Immunol. 39 (1): 61–6. doi:10.5114/ceji.2014.42126. PMC 4439975. PMID 26155101.
              3. Ahbap E, Kara E, Sahutoglu T, Basturk T, Koc Y, Sakaci T, Sevinc M, Akgol C, Ucar ZA, Kayalar AO, Bayraktar F, Ozagari AA, Unsal A (July 2014). “Outcome of 121 patients with renal amyloid a amyloidosis”. J Res Med Sci. 19 (7): 644–9. PMC 4214024. PMID 25364365.
              4. Ayar Y, Ersoy A, Oksuz MF, Ocakoglu G, Vuruskan BA, Yildiz A, Isiktas E, Oruc A, Celikci S, Arslan I, Sahin AB, Güllülü M (2017). “Clinical outcomes and survival in AA amyloidosis patients”. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed. 57 (6): 535–544. doi:10.1016/j.rbre.2017.02.002. PMID 29173691.


              Template:WH Template:WS

              Diagnosis

              Diagnosis

              Diagnostic study of choice | History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Findings | Electrocardiogram | X-Ray Findings | Echocardiography and Ultrasound | CT-Scan Findings | MRI Findings | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies

              Treatment

              Treatment

              Medical Therapy | Interventions | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

              Case Studies

              Case Studies

              Case #1

              Looking for the patient version?

              Back to the patient-friendly article

              © 2026 MyEClinic – IFTM Institut für Telematik in der Medizin GmbH